Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007 10 22 Regular 600 Settlements with Smiths and Camarano from Sewer System Back-Ups COMMISSION AGENDA October 22, 2007 Regular Meeting Consent Informational Public Hearin Re ular MGR. "~DEPT. Authorization x ITEM 600 REQUEST: This item was tabled at the October 8, 2007 Commission Meeting. Request Commission to remove item from the table. City Manager requesting the City Commission to consider settlements with David & Shelli Smith and Michael & Lorraine Camarano resulting from sewer system back-ups during Hurricane Charley and approve a supplemental appropriation from Utility Fund Reserves for funding of these settlements. PURPOSE: This agenda item is needed to for the City Commission to consider settlements with David & Shelli Smith and Michael & Lorraine Camarano, the final two claimants against the City, resulting from sewer system back-ups during Hurricane Charley and approve a supplemental appropriation from Utility Fund Reserves for funding of these settlements. CONSIDERATIONS: 1. On December 14, 2005 the City Commission approved settlement with seven homeowners as a result of sewer system back-ups during Hurricane Charley. Terms ofthe settlement included: 1. 10% of approved losses, plus 2. $2,500, plus 3. A pro rata share of a pool of $17,500 (Pool derived as follows: $2,500 per homeowner x 7 homeowners = $17,500). Homeowner's pro rata share based on the proportion of the individual homeowner's approved losses to the whole. On recommendation from counsel and the City's insurance company (Florida League of Cities), three remaining cases (Smith, Camarano & Walters) were not settled at that time as these parties had pending claims with their respective insurance companies. The aforementioned December 14, 2005 approved motion specified that the settlement at that time was for the seven claimants only. II. On February 27, 2006 the City Commission approved settlement with Walters, as agreed upon by Mr. Walters, as follows: 1. 10% oflosses per private carrier State Farm = $3,919.20, plus 2. $2,500. Total Settlement for Walters = $6,419.20 As required, Mr. Walters provided the Florida League of Cities with a statement from his insurance company that they were not pursuing any subrogation claim against the City. III. Mr. Smith and Mr. Camarano are requesting settlement terms commensurate with those afforded the original seven claimants as dictated per the December 14 Commission action. However, the City and Mr. Smith & Mr. Camarano do not agree with the method in which to arrive at a settlement amount that is commensurate with the original seven claimants. At issue is the calculation of the "Proportional Share." CITY POSITION In the City's opinion, settlement for Smith and Camarano, commensurate with the Commission action of December 14, 2006, would be calculated as follows: Smith Approved Losses per Claimant's Insurance Company $258,784.40 10% of Approved Losses Base Amount Proportional Share Total 25,878.44 2,500.00 2,786.49 $31,164.93 Camarano Approved Losses per Claimant's Insurance Company $205,570.54 10% of Approved Losses Base Amount Proportional Share Total 20,557.05 2,500.00 2,213.51 $25,270.56 Total Settlement = $56,435.49 All offers are contingent upon: 1. Commission approval of settlement, 2. Claimant's execution of a full release within 15 days after receipt of this settlement agreement, and 3. Each claimant providing the City with a statement from his insurance company that they will not pursue any subrogation claim against the City. This documentation has been provided to the City by both Smith and Camarano. CLAIMANT POSITION In Mr. Smith and Mr. Camarano's opinion, settlement for Smith and Camarano, commensurate with the Commission action of December 14,2006, would be calculated as follows (the difference relates specifically to the calculation of the "proportional share."): Additionally, Mr. Smith is requesting 100% reimbursement for attorney's fees he has incurred as a result if this claim. Smith Approved Losses per Claimant's Insurance Company $258,784.40 10% of Approved Losses Base Amount Proportional Share Attorney Bills * Total 25,878.44 2,500.00 13,948.48 1.365.00 $43,691.92 Camarano Approved Losses per Claimant's Insurance Company $205,570.54 10% of Approved Losses Base Amount Proportional Share Total 20,557.05 2,500.00 11.080.25 $34,137.30 Total Settlement = $77,829.22 * Includes $500 estimated cost for Smith's attorney to review settlement agreement (not yet expended). SUMMARY TABLE City Claimant Position Position Delta Smith: 10% of Approved Losses $ 25,878.44 $ 25,878.44 0 Base Amount 2,500.00 2,500.00 0 Proportional Share 2,786.49 13,948.48 $ 11,161.99 Attorney Fees 0.00 1.365.00 1.365.00 Total 31,164.93 43,691.92 12,526.99 Camarano: 10% of Approved Losses $ 20,557.05 $ 20,557.05 0 Base Amount 2,500.00 2,500.00 0 Proportional Share 2,213.51 1 1.080.25 $ 8,866.74 Total 25,270.56 34,137.30 8,866.74 Total $ 56,435.49 $ 77,829.22 $ 21,393.73 City Position vs. Claimant Position Delta = $21,393.73. ALTERNATIVE POSITION An alternative settlement option would be to recalculate the proportional share as if all 10 claimants had been settled at the same time. Following the same logic that was established by the Commission at the December 14, 2005 meeting, the ten homeowners would be offered settlement terms as follows: 1. 10% of approved losses, plus 2. $2,500, plus 3. A pro rata share of a pool of $25,000 (Pool derived as follows: $2,500 per homeowner x 10 homeowners = $25,000). Homeowner's pro rata share based on the proportion of the individual homeowner's approved losses to the whole. This settlement arrangement is depicted in Attachment 1 and would result in the following settlement offers for Smith and Camarano specifically: Smith Approved Losses per Claimant's Insurance Company $258,784.40 10% of Approved Losses Base Amount Proportional Share Total 25,878.44 2,500.00 7.394.78 $35,773.22 Camarano Approved Losses per Claimant's Insurance Company $205,570.54 10% of Approved Losses Base Amount Proportional Share Total 20,557.05 2,500.00 5.874.19 $28,931.24 Total Settlement = $64,707.46 FUNDING: Funding will be via payment by the Florida League of Cities and a supplemental appropriation from Utility Fund Reserves as follows: 10% of Approved losses (FLC to pay): Base Arnt. & Prop. Share (City to pay): Total City Position $46,435.49 10,000.00 $56,435.49 Claimant Position $46,435.49 30,028.73 $76,464.22 Alternative Position $46,435.49 18,268.97 $64,707.46 RECOMMENDATION: The City Manager recommends the Commission choose one of the following four (4) options, exclusive of attorney fees: OPTION 1 1. Approval final settlement with David & Shelli Smith and Michael & Lorraine Camarano resulting from sewer system back-ups during Hurricane Charley in the amounts of $31,164.93 and $25,270.56, respectively, contingent upon execution of a full release within 15 days after their receipt of the settlement agreement. 2. Approve a supplemental appropriation from Utility Fund Reserves in the amount of the City portion of $10,000. OPTION 2 1. Approval final settlement with David & Shelli Smith and Michael & Lorraine Camarano resulting from sewer system back-ups during Hurricane Charley in the amounts of $42,326.92 and $34,137.30, respectively, contingent upon execution of a full release within 15 days after their receipt of the settlement agreement. 2. Approve a supplemental appropriation from Utility Fund Reserves in the amount of the City portion of$30,028.73. OPTION 3 1. Approval final settlement with David & Shelli Smith and Michael & Lorraine Camarano resulting from sewer system back-ups during Hurricane Charley in the amounts of $35,773.22 and $28,931.24, respectively, contingent upon execution of a full release within 15 days after their receipt of the settlement agreement. 2. Approve a supplemental appropriation from Utility Fund Reserves in the amount of the City portion of$18,268.97. OPTION 4 1. Other action as deemed appropriate. A TT ACHMENTS: 1. Settlement Calculations assuming all ten homeowners had settled at the same time. COMMISSION ACTION: ~ I- Z w :IE :I: o <C l- I- <C >- Q) ~ ns .c o Q) c c ns (,) 'C ~ ::;, ::I: .c - ';: "C Q) .s e ,!! ~ (,) Q) o e I/) "' ~ CI) 1/)1/)- Q,C"' ::;,0" ~~Q) (,).!!i3 ns ::;, Q) III~CI) i~~ ...,....:::: I/) c "' ~Q)Q) ~ E e Q) .9:! ::s 3: t:: CI) Q) Q) CI) cncnq: .;...; c<( 0) E 0) +:: - 0) en o + III + <( - c 0) ro E <5 0) 1-:::: 0) en o O-g 0<( o . -t:: L() 0 No. ~O .... a.. III ro c o 0) t ro O.s:: g-en .... a.. 8.... ...J~ ~o 0)" o 0) C I/) ro .- .... > ::J 0) ~o:: 1"-('i)1"-"<;f"...-O')O')...-N"<;f" ...-...-...-('i)('i)...-O')...-NN ...-N I"-L()"<;f" L() 0')0') ('i)...- ...-L()('i)L()0')0')0')('i)1"-('i) NI"-I"-ONL()L()L()I"-O') CON...-CO(OL()NI"-L()CO ...-...-...- ('i)N NCO...-"<;f"(OO')N...-COcn I"-~O')(oNCONO')"""I'"' ...-CON"<;f"('i)I"-NO')~~ 0') I"-L()('i)"<;f"CON...-cn,... "<;f"NONCO(O ...-C")CO ('i)NN...- ...-"':&6 - C ::J o E <( 0) I/) ro OJ 0000000000 0000000000 0000000000 0000000000 L()L()L()L()L()L()L()L()L()L() NNNNNNNNNN '#.'#.'#.'#.'#.'#.'#.'#.'#.'#. O...-NO')~CO...-L()(OL() "<;f"O')CO"<;f"('i)NO"<;f"O')('i) ...- NN L()L()(OOL()OI"-O"<;f"L() ~(oNI"-O('i)I"-N~O O')('i)"<;f"O...-I"-I"-O')COI"- ...-I"-CONL()OI"-...-I"-L() NO')"'-('i)O')"<;f" O')COL() NI"-I"-"<;f"NN ('i)L()0 ...- NN 0) E ro z .... 0) E 0 "E E c o ro crow ns ~oc :2.... Ero::(j).c; .s::-O) 0) 0) O-~E - :0 .!:::! E ~ .... .s:: ro E ::J roO)O> ns o::m::2<(OJ0en>cno I"- co cx:i co "<;f" I"- ('i) ...- o o c::i o o L() N o o c::i o o L() N ~ o o c::i o ...- I"- co cx:i co "<;f" I"- co Date: October 22, 2007 The attached was distributed by Mr. Mike Camarano during the discussion of Regular Agenda Item "600" at the October 22, 2007 City Commission Regular Meeting. ---- -- ---- ------T im -----_~~~~___=____=_____+--------, _______ ! whaT-l--whac=___t------_ Appro,,~(jJ:~ss % of : % of : Should have . Did L % of i - Loss r-SubtotaT_r=i_fOial=-=-TH8P-pened' Happen--I---Loss $114,656.82 35.32%: 13.84%, $3,460.97 $6,180.16 __,_ ______+ m ___ $66,661.31 20.53% 8.05% $2,012.20 $3,593.14 $45,780.61 14.10%5.53%- -- -$1,381.9-1 $2,467.64 $43,207.03 13.31% 5.22%$1-,304-:-2-2l $2,328.92 $29,510.51 ' -9.09-0/0--3-.560/;$890.791 $1,590.66 $24,072.99 [ u 7.41% 2.91%$726.65[ $1,29T5Y "-- -$777.661 0.24% 0.09%-- -$23:47r-$41.92 j -- ---------------r - , $39,192.00l 4.73%: $1,183.03' $0.00: $2fjB,784.40 31.25% $2,786.49 $20fj,510.$4 -24.820/0$2,213.51 $9,8()0.22. $15,199.781 $25,000.00 : -nut ----un-nut - , ! * - Approved Loss based on the figure provided in ITEM 300 December 1 10/22/2007 Claimant Rutherford* Bibiloni* Mize* Almeida* Baker* : German* _nt---- ! Schollhammer* , i Walters :Smith -t-- ! Camarano A G OPTION 2 What we j Are asl<ir1g-fc:>r + ~/L~~S- $6,180.16 _ ------------.- $3,593.14 $2,467.64 $2,328.92 $1,590.66 $1,297.57 $41.92 -- ------------------ $0.00 c D E -- ------------------ -- OPTION 1 F !- 39.20% 60.80% 1st 7 Subtotal $324,666.99 - --------------------....-------- . 2nd 3 Subtotal $503,546.94 I ---------n-----i-- -- ,Total $828,213.931 $17,500.00 -- ----------------- -------- - $5,000.00 $22,500.00 $17,500.00 $25,028.73 -- - - - --..---..------------ ------..--- $42,528.73 2005 en CD r-+ r-+ - CD () 3 Q) CD 3 :J Q) r-+ -, 0 Q) :J --h 0 en Qo CD ~ en CD 3 .., -- ,....... 0 ::J"" ~ tu ." 3 -- :J tu Q) co - ~ CD '-""'" () - tu -- 3 -f::fi I\.) 01 ^ m I tu (') ""0 ::r ...., ... 0 ... ..c ""0 c tu 0 ;4- ;:4. CD -- ..., 0 ... ... ..., ::J CD tu "'C - ..., CD .... .... en G) CD ::J 0 t"'+ en 0 .y:) c.. I'V ... T1 CJ'1 0 tu 0 -- r-+ 0 ::T ..., ... ... ~ ""C 0 cf2. tu '< 3 CD ::J r-+ What should have happened · 1 st 7 ( 400/0 ) · $324K in damages · $10,000 distributed Remaining 3 (600/0) $503K in damages $15,000 kept for eventual settlements . . -Efl ~ ~ en ........ ~ - CJ"1 ~ 0 0 .............. 0.. ~ -. en 0 ~ ~. ";:!2.. ~ C"' C 0 ,...... ""'-"'" CD 0.. :::T Q) ,....... c.. ~ -- I\.) c.. """"- a CJ1 :::T -Efl :::0 Q) ........ CD - -C CJ"1 3 0 -C 0 Q) - CD CD -- ;::p :J -- ::J :J CO VJ .............. VJ 0 ";:!2.. 0 ""'-"'" What Option 1 proposes (Walter's "quarter" never paid) · 1 5t 7 (700/0) · 400/0 of damage ($324K) · Paid $17,500 Final 2 (200/0) 560/0 of damage ($464K) Split $5,000 Half a solution Pay final 2 what we should have without the error · 1 8t 7 Final 2 · Paid $17,500 Split $14,000 · Percentages are invalid because proportionality still not maintained What Option 2 proposes Pay the Final 2 the 5.390/0 rate established by payments to the 1 st 7 · 1 st 7 Final 2 · Paid $17,500 Split $25,000 · 400/0 of new total* 560/0 of new total* · * New total would be $44.6K if Walter's share paid Date: October 22, 2007 The attached was distributed by Mr. Dave Smith during the discussion of Regular Agenda Item "600" at the October 22, 2007 City Commission Regular Meeting. {poD ITEM Ji'W CAMARANO I SMITH SETTLEMENT PROPORTIONAL SHARE - UNDISPUTABLE FACT THE FIRST 7 RECIEVED COMPENSATION AT THE RATE OF L1;11 ~k CITY COMMISSION'S PRIOR COMMITMENT, ALL WILL BE TREATED EQUALLY. SMITH ATTORNEY BILLS - THE CITY HAS SET A PRECEDENCE BY PAYING THESES FEES TO SOME OF THE 1sT 7. THESE FEES BEING SOUGHT ARE STRICTLY FOR DEALINGS WITH THE CITY, NOT THE NATIONWIDE LAWSUIT. ACTUAL TOTAL LOSS - THE ACTUAL TOTAL LOSS IS $44,133.00 HIGHER, SMITH DID NOT INCLUDE ATTY FEES PAID BY NATIONWIDE WHICH WOULD HAVE MADE THE SMITH CLAIM $6,792.00 MORE. SMITH LAWSUIT TOOK 9 MONTHS TO SETTLE. CAMARANO AND SMITH - SAVE CITY OF WINTERSPRINGS 1/2 MILLION DOLLARS AFTER 3 YEARS OF ARDUOUS EFFORTS ON BEHALF OF THE CAMARANOS AND SMITHS PLEASE ALLOW THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT, IF ANY, TO SIDE WITH THE CLAIMANT AND PLEASE VOTE TO AUTHORIZE OPTION 2 DELLECKER "WILSON KING McKENNA & RUFFIER, LLP Robert H. Dellecker t Samuel P. King * Kenneth J. McKenna William E. Ruffier* Anthony E Sos Brian T. Wilson* · Board Certified Civil Trial Lawyer t Also Admitted to the Georgia Bar ATTORNEYS AT LAW 719 Vassar Street Orlando, Florida 32804 Telepbone (407) 244-3000 Facsimile (407) 244-3033 www.dwklaw.com Paralegals Valerie L. Bridges Darcie Carsner Denise Eberhard-Coughlin Susan Ochs-Conrad Lori A. Velazquez Sue Zupka November 10,2006 City of Winter Springs Ronald W. McLemore, City Mai1ager 1126 E. SR 434 Winter Springs, FL 32708-2799 Re: Sewer backup damage claim for 1612 White Dove Drive, Winter Springs, FL Dear Mr. McLemore: , I have not heard from you since my letter of October 23,2006. However, since that letter the Smiths have incurred more damages due to the City of Winter Springs' negligence. Specific,ally, they have been rejected for homeowners' coverage due to the loss they sustained as a result of the cities' negligence. We have enclosed a letter from Farley Insurance Services, who have been unable to place the Smith's vacation home with a traditional insurance carrier, but instead had to place them through Lloyds of London. We are enclosing the letter with the difference in insurance premiums. As you can see, but for the City of Winter Springs' negligence, the Smiths would owe an annual premium of $805.60 with Auto Owners instead of a premium of $3,130.55 from Lloyds of London, for a difference of $2,324.95 per year. When this is annualized over time, the claim becomes even more significant. Please contact me within the next twenty (20) days and let me know how the City of Winter Springs intends to deal with this issue. " WER:tl cc: David & Shelli Smith A Referral-Based Personal Injury Law Firm DEAN, RINGEllH3. MORGAN AND LAWTON A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW NOV - 9 2006 GOBLE D. DEAN [1913-2000] DALE O. MORGAN' WILLIAM E. LAWTON.. LAMAR D. OXFORD F. SCOTT PENDLEY.++ JOHN D. ROBINSON FRANK C. WESIGHAN+ JEFFRY J. BRANHAM+ JOSEPH R. FLOOD, JR. ALAN D. KALINOSKI +.. # RONALD P. GRENINGER DOUGLAS T. NOAH G. CLAY MORRIS JAMES A. WILKINSON S. RENEE STEPHENS LUNDY CAPITAL PLAZA I. SUITE 1200 201 EAST PINE STREET POST OFFICE BOX 2928 ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32B02 (407) 422-4310 FAX (407) 648-0233 JOHN M. JOYCE A. LYNNE RINGERS.. MICHAEL A. LOWE FERMAN M. FERNANDEZ JOHN T. CONNER DONNA N. MALONEY HANSEN ANDREW L. RINGERS. OF COUNSEL FLORIDA BAR BOARD CERTIFIED CIVIL TRiAL LAWYER + FLORIDA BAR BOARD CERTIFIED WORKERS' COMPENSATION LAWYER ++ ADMITTED TO THE GEORGIA BAR # ADMITTED TO THE DIST. OF COWMSIA BAR ."* ADMITTED TO THE ILUNDIS BAR November 8, 2006 Will iam E. Ruffier, Esq. Dellecker Wilson King McKenna & Ruffier, LLP 719 Vassar Street Orlando, FL 32804 Re: Your Clients Date of Loss Our Client David 8: Shelli Smith August 1 5, 2004 City of Winter Springs Dear Mr. Ruffier: I have been provided a copy of your letter dated October 23, 2006 to Ron McLemore, the City Manager for the City of Winter Springs demanding a settlement on behalf of your clients in the amount of $36,358.00. I have been asked to respond to the same. I would note that a similar demand had been made on behalf of Nationwide Insurance Company by letter dated February 28, 2006. That letter was received from counsel representing Nationwide. The City of Winter Springs has already paid well in excess of $200,000.00 for the claims which have been made against it arising from this incident. This would include claims for the damage, repair, and restoration of the properties in question as well as the payments which have been tendered and accepted for full and complete settlement of claims by certain residents. For that reason, the City is statutorily immune from the payment of any additional sums of money absent a claims bill. Page 1 of 1 DJS INC From: To: Sent: Subject: "Kevin Smith" <ksmith@winterspringsfl.org> <djs_inc@bellsouth.net> Saturday, September 08, 2007 11 :20 AM FW: Agenda Item for Monday Dave, I forgot to mention that the City Manager was not in favor of reimbursing your attorney fees. That's why it's not included in the "City's Position" number. However, I did include it in the "Claimant's position." Again, it will be the Commission's call but I wanted you to know why I didn't include it . Thanks, Kevin Kevin L. Smith General Services Director City of Winter Springs 407 -327 -6557 ksmith@winterspringsfl.org From: Kevin Smith Sent: Saturday, September 08,200711:18 AM To: 'djs_inc@bellsouth.net' Subject: Agenda Item for Monday Dave, Info attached. Call with any questions. Thanks, Kevin Kevin L. Smith General Services Director City of Winter Springs 407 -327 -6557 ksmith@winterspringsfl.org Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, and any attachment to it, contains information intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity named on the e-mail. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that reading it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately return it to the sender and delete it from your system. Thank you. 9/1 0/2007 DELLECKER "WILSON KING McKENNA & HUFFIER, LLP Robert H. Dellecker t Samuel P. King * Kenneth J. McKenna William E. Ruffier* Anthony E Sos Brian T. Wilson * ATTORNEYS AT LAW 719 Vassar Street Orlando, Florida 32804 Telephone (407) 244-3000 Facsimile (407) 244-3033 www.dwklaw.com * Board Certified Civil Trial Lawyer t Also Admitted to the Georgia Bar October 8, 2007 David Smith Re: City of Winter Springs Dear David: Paralegals Denise Eberhard-Coughlin Susan Ochs-Conrad LauraJ. Ryan Christine Winsor This letter is to confirm that we were paid by the City of Winter Springs for reviewing a release that they proposed resolving the settlement of David Mize I s issues with the City of Winter Springs over the home flooding. Please give me a call should you have any questions. Sincerely, WER/kt A Referral-Based Personal Injury LaW" Firm