HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000 04 10 Regular E Winter Springs Executive Park
^ ,
..,,-- --
I,t: ..
COMMISSION AGENDA
ITEM E
Consent
Information
Public Hearing
Regula r XX
April 10, 2000
Meeting
MGR. ru--1D,l!!-.
REQUEST: Community Development Department, Land Development Division, presents to
the City Commission, for their action, the Planning and Zoning Board
recommendation on the final engineering plans as it relates to the proposed Winter
Springs Executive Park.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this agenda item is to present to the Commission the Planning and
Zoning Board recommendation as it relates lto the final engineering plans for the
proposed Winter Springs Executive Park. The property is located on the north
side ofSR 434, approximately three thousand (3,000) feet east of the Greeneway.
APPLICABLE CODE:
Section 9-73. Form and contents of final development plan.
(a)
(b) Additional engineering/plans to accompany the final development plan/plat:
(1) Potable water including fire protection systems.
(2) Sanitary sewer.
(3) Drainage and stormwater management facilities, including
underdrains.
(4) Bulkheads.
(5) Excavation and fill.
(6) Sidewalks, bicycle paths, and bridle paths.
, -
April 10, 2000
REGULAR AGENDA ITEM E
Page 2
(7) Streets and curbs. Street grades and elevation shall be established to
minimize the need for underdrains. In soils where high groundwater is
found or suspected, cuts shall be minimized in order to reduce the need for
underdrains. Wherever along the proposed roadways projected
groundwater elevation is less than one (1) foot, six (6) inches below the
bottom of swale (or bottom of road base where curb and gutter is used),
underdrains shall be required.
(8) Soils explorations. The results of comprehensive soils explorations,
evaluation of results and recommendations by a city-approved soils
engineering and testing firm. The soils exploration work shall include as a
mlmmum:
a. Results of borings located by survey at suitable intervals along
the proposed roadways; classification and properties of soils
encountered; and groundwater elevation to Unites States
Geological Survey datum found subsequent to making the borings.
The evaluation of the results and recommendations by the soils
firm shall include as a minimum: Recommendations on the type of
base construction; projected high-water elevation to United States
Geological Survey datum along the proposed roadways, need,
design, size, location, depth and details of underdrains; and a
recommendation on the elevation of street grades, including depth
of cut. The results of the soils work, evaluation of results, and
recommendations shall be incorporated into the plans and
specifications submitted for review.
b. If during construction of improvements, the city determines in
the field that soils and/or groundwater conditions are found to be
different than shown in the data submitted with final development
and engineering plans, or there is question about adequacy of the
approved plans caused by conditions found in the field, the city
shall have the right to require the performance and submission of
additional soils work and/or to require modification of the
previously approved d.esign plans including, but not limited to
modifications of street grades and/or installation of additional
underdrains, use of soil cement base course, or other modification
,;0;: -
"
April 10, 2000
REGULAR AGENDA ITEM A
Page 3
(9) Lot grading. At the time of final engineering plans are submitted, lot
grading and drainage plans shall be submitted for review and approval.
The plans shall show minimum floor elevations for all homes, existing
topography, grading of all lots, and any drainage improvements proposed
or required on the lots. The lot grading and drainage plans shall show the
lot lines, existing topography (one-foot contour intervals), and proposed
lot filling, grading and drainage at a scale of one (1) inch is equal to one
hundred (100) feet (or larger) in general accordance with FHA standards
for lot grading. Substantiating soil borings, evaluations and studies shall
also be submitted to document soil conditions, projected high-water
groundwater elevation on the lots, and adequacy of the lot grading and
drainage plans.
(10) Street lighting plan, demonstrating power company participation.
(11) Landscaping plans. Where site is commercial, industrial, or
multifamily in nature, landscaping plans shall be presented along with the
final development plans, unless specifically waived by the staff at the time
of processing the preliminary plan.
Section 9-74. Action on final developmelllt plan; expiration of approval.
(a) .....The final development plan may be approved ifit complies with all
relevant regulations included in this chapter. Approval of the plan shall be
subject to fulfillment of all conditions specified by the city staff and sanctioned
by the city commission. Action to approve a final development plan shall be
taken by the city commission within thirty (30) days after receipt by the city of
the complete plan with all supporting data required by this chapter.
(b) If within two (2) years after approval of a final development plan of a
development not part of a PUD and for which the plat has not yet been recorded,
the development encompassed by the plan has not been completed and inspected
by the city, the final development plan shall be resubmitted for reap pro val of all
streets and areas within the scope of the plan that remain incomplete and/or
unable to function independently of completi:on of remaining undeveloped
portions of the development covered by the previously approved plan. Procedures
for reapproval of such expired final development plans shall be the same as for
the original approval.
r ,-
April 10, 2000
REGULAR AGENDA ITEM E
Page 4
S.R. 434 CORRIDOR VISION PLAN, N,~w Development Area
CHRONOLOGY:
August 17, 1999 - Pre-application Me<eting with Staff
September 1, 1999 - Conceptual Plan presented to Planning and Zoning Board
September 27, 1999 - Conceptual Plan pfiesented to Commission
October 5, 1999
- Final Engineering submitted
March 7, 2000
- Development Review Committee met on Final
Engineering
March 22, 2000
- Final Engineering presented to Planning and Zoning
Board
FINDINGS: It was determined that the final engineering for Winter Springs Executive Park
meets all code requirements.
RECOMMENDA TION:
Motion by Board Member Clinch: "I will make a motion to recommend for
approval to forward to the City Commission recommending approval, the Winter
Springs Executive Park final engineering plans, as condition the developer submit
a FDOT permit prior to pre-construction." All members present voted aye.
ATTACHMENTS:
A
- Planning and Zoning Board Minutes of March 22,2000
B
- Development Review Committee Minutes of March 7, 2000
C
- Final Engineering Plans
COMMISSION ACTION:
ATTACHMENT A
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
MlNUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARDILPA
SPECIAL MEETING
MARCH 22, 2000
I. CALL TO ORDER
The Planning And Zoning BoardlLPA Special Meeting was called to order Wednesday,
March 22, 2000, at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Carl Stephens, Jr., in the Commission
Chambers of the Municipal Building (City Hall, 1126 East State Road 434, Winter
Springs, Florida 32708). The Pledge of Allegiance followed.
Roll Call
Chairman Carl Stephens, Jr., present
Vice Chairman Marc Clinch, present
Board Member Tom Brown, absent
Board Member Bill Fernandez, present
Board Member Rosanne Karr, absent
Also Present
Mr. Thomas Grimms, AICP, Comprehensive Planning/Zoning Coordinator
Mr. Don LeBlanc, Land Development Coordinator
Approval Of The March 1, Planning And Zoning BoardlLocal Planning
Agency Regular Meeting Minutes
MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER FERNANDEZ. "1 WILL MAKE A MOTION
TO APPROVE THE MARCH 1, 2000 AS CIRCULATED BY MAIL." VICE
CHAIRMAN CLINCH SECONDED. DISCUSSION.
VOTE:
VICE CHAIRMAN MARC CLINCH: AYE
BOARD MEMBER FERNANDEZ: AYE
CHAIRMAN CARL STEPHENS, JR.: AYE
MOTION CARRIED.
Mr. Gimms, AICP, Comprehensive Planning/Zoning Coordinator informed Chairman
Stephens that Board Member Tom Brown and Board Member Rosanne Karr had
contacted him to advise him that they were unable to attend tonight's meeting.
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING/LPA
SPECIAL /I-lEETING - MARCH 22, 2000
PAGE20F4
II. REGULAR AGENDA
A. Winter Springs Executive Park - Final Engineering Plans
Mr. Don LeBlanc, Land Development Coordinator informed the Board of the site's
location; that the plans meet all of the Code requirements; that Staff recommends that the
Planning and Zoning Board favorably forward this to the City Commission; and that the
Florida Department of Transportation, (FDOT) permit be presented to the Engineering
Department prior to the pre-construction meeting.
The Board discussed the storm management system; that the Storm Engineer has
reviewed and approved the plans; commended the Cathcarts for coming before the Board
"before they had their preliminary engineering, shared their plan with us, we shared our
concerns with them and all those concerns have been met"'; that a sprinkler system is not
required because of the building height and size; the New Development Guidelines; and
which Staff personnel have reviewed the plans.
MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER CLINCH. "I WU:"L MAKE A MOTION TO
RECOMMEND FOR APPROVAL TO FORVIARD TO THE CITY
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL, THE WINTER SPRINGS
EXECUTIVE PARK FINAL ENGINEERING PLANS, AS CONDITION THE
DEVELOPER SUBMIT A FDOT PERMIT PRIOR TO PRE-CONSTRUCTION."
BOARD MEMBER FERNANDEZ SECONDED. DISCUSSION.
VOTE:
VICE CHAIRMAN MARC CLINCH: AYE
CHAIRMAN CARL STEPHENS, JR.: AYE
BOARD MEMBER FERNANDEZ: AYE
MOTION CARRIED.
Mr. LeBlanc departed at 7: 13 p.m.
B. Further Revisions to the Updated Transportation Element (Vol. 1 of 1
and 2 of 2) Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Mr. Grimms explained the history of the Amendment; tlhe pages being in the correct
sequence; and Staff's request to consider recommending to the City Commission
adoption of the Updated Transportation Element (Volume 1 of 2 and 2 of 2)
Comprehensive Plan Amendment.
Discussion ensued regarding Fisher Road being misspeUed; that on page 1II-18 the
circled items are corrections; that it seems reasonable that water lines would be installed
when drainage and paving is being done on Fisher Road; that before each phase is started,
a public hearing will be held; and if the Section 20-359 has anything to do with this
document.
CITY OF WINTER SPRlNGS
MINUTES
PLA1'lNING AND ZONING/LPA
SPECIAL MEETING - MARCH 22, 2000
PAGE30F4
Board Member Fernandez stated, "Just for the record, to clean my skirts and everybody
else's skirts - coming in the door out there, Commissioner Edward Martinez stopped me
and indicated he wanted to talk to me there or wanted to make a presentation at the public
meeting because he also has concerns about those same sections I have commented on
twice and I told him I would put it on the record so he didn't have to hang around. It will
hit his level at some point, - I assume we're going to address it and I even think Staff
agrees, you don't even know why it is in there and it shouldn't be, it's messed up and
needs to be worked on."
Mr. Gimms informed the Board that the Land Development Regulations (LDR) does
need to be revisited in the near future.
The Board continued discussing "The Transportation study being based on a ten year
plan, projecting out to the year 20] 0 and what is the mechanism to warrant a new Traffic
study"; and Chapter ] 63 of the Growth Management Act allowing the flexibility for
reVISions.
MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER FERNANDEZ. "I WOULD MOVE THEN
THAT WE RECOMMEND THAT CITY COMMISSION CALL A SECOND
ADOPTION PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPT THE PUBLIC LARGE SCALE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT, LG-CPA-I-97 UPDATING THE
TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ELEMENT IN VOLUME 1 OF 1 AND VOLUME 2 OF
2 THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INCORPORATING THE
RESPONSES TO THE ORC (OBJECTIONS, RJ~COMMENDA TIONS AND
COMMENTS) REPORT FROM THE DEP ART1VlENT OF COMMUNITY
AFFAIRS AND SUPPLEMENT NUMBER ONE O]~ THE CITY OF WINTER
SPRINGS TRANSPORTATION STUDY MADE AUGUST OF 1997." VICE
CHAIRMAN CLINCH SECONDED. DISCUSSION.
VOTE:
BOARD MEMBER FERNANDEZ: AYE
CHAIRMAN CARL STEPHENS, .f&.: AYE
VICE CHAIRMAN MARC CLINCH: AYE
MOTION CARRIED.
II. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Chairman Stephens informed the Board that he has not received an answer from the City
Manager regarding the letter dated February 81h.
Discussion followed regarding that Mr. LeBlanc be reminded to give the Board a copy of
the New Development Guidelines; that the digital map is presently being corrected and
by the first of May it should be presented to the Board; and! that they would like an update
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING/LP A
SPECIAL MEETING - MARCH 22, 2000
PAGE 4 OF 4
on the Town Center in the near future. They also inquired if reimbursements are taxable
and should be documented on the 1099 form.
III. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER FERNANDEZ. "I MOVE TO ADJOURN THE
MEETING AT 7:30."
Chairman Stephen adjourned the meeting at 7:30 p.m. with the consensus of the Board.
Minutes Respectfully Submitted by: Debbie Gillespie, City Clerk's Office
City of Winter Springs, Florida
APPROVED:
CARL STEPHENS, JR., CHAIRMAN
PLANNING and ZONING BOARDILP A
NOTE: l1\esc minutes were approved at the
, 2000 Planning And Zoning BoardlLP A Meeting.
\\CITYHALIJ _ PDCIS H ARED\City Clerk IDocs\ W ordlBOARDSIP LANNINGlalII\M IN UTES\2000IP&Z 032200.doc
ATTACHMENT B
March 8, 2000
To:
Community Development Director
Staff
Land Development Coordinator #
From:
Re:
Development Review Committee
Final Engineering, Winter Springs Executive Park
The above referenced Development Review Committee convened on March 7,2000 to consider
the final engineering for Winter Springs Executive Park. D. Cathcart represented the
development. Staff members present were Carrington, Cook, Dallas, Houck and LeBlanc.
Please see attached Staff comments.
Motion by Houck that the project be forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Board with the
recommendation for approval - seconded by Cook. All voted aye.
Memorandum
~lP,'{~< ~~~~:::.
To: Don LeBlanc, Land Development Coordinator
cc:
From: Don Houck, Building Official ~'-
Date: 03/07/00
Re: Winter Springs Executive Park Engineering Comments
No further comments
1
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
RE:
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708-2799
Telephone (407) 327-1800
Fax (407) 327-6695
Mnrch 6, 2000
Don LcBlanc, Land Dcvelopmcnt Coordinator
Jimelle Cook, Code Enfmcemen! Manager @
Winter Springs Executive Park
I have no further commcnts on the landscape plan for the above referenced project.
MEMO FOR RECORD
March 3, 2000
Land Development Coordinator #
From:
Re:
Final Engineering
Winter Springs Executive Park
I have no further comments to offer on this project.
CITY OF WINTER SPIUNGS, FLORIDA
1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS, Fl.:ORIDA 32708 - 2799
TELEPHONE (40;7) 327-1800
February 24, 2000
David Evans, P.E
Pecht, Evans, Engineering, Inc.
501 E. Jackson Street
Suite 202
Orlando, FL 32801
RE: WINTER SPRINGS EXECuTIVE PARK, PROPOSED.
Review of Engineering - Seal Date January 26, 2000
Dear Mr. Evans:
A review of the subject engineering plans finds them to be in general conformance to the
City's Land Development Code and sound engineering practices. I recommend the subject
engineering for approval by the City.
NOTE: I will need a copy of your FDOT permit prior to our Pre-construction Meeting. All
I have is "an intent to issue" the permit, from FDOT. Telephone conversation with Stan
Mann, ofFDOT, reveals they will issue the permit after the City approves the project and
your client provides them with the appropriate Performance Bond.
If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call:at (407) 327-5976. Thank you.
Sincerely,
~h~
Mark L. Jenkins, P.E. . d
City Engineer
cc: City Manager, Ron McLemore
Community Development Director, Charles Carrington
Land Development Coordinator, Don LeBlanc
David Evans, FAX # 407-246-0963
David Cathcart, FAX # 407-977-8349
Donald LeBlanc
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Kimberley Hall
Wednesday, February 09, 20004:08 PM
Donald LeBlanc
Eckerd and ws executive park
Don-
I have no comments for the Winter Springs Executive Park.
For the Eckerd Drugs site the only comment I have is that the thrust restraint shop drawing should be submitted to the
City of Winter Springs, not Seminole County (I am o.k. if they make this change by hand).
As a general question for Eckerd Drugs - on sheet 3 of 14, should there be crosswalks at the two access drives along SR
434?
-kim
"
t.
MEMORANDUM
To: Don LeBlanc, Land Development Coordinator
From: Robert E. Dallas, Fire Marshal
Date: November 5, 1999
Subject: Revised engineering plans, Winter Springs Executive Park
Fire Department personnel have reviewed the above noted project and offer the
following comments.
It appears that all previous comments presented by the fire department have
been satisfactorily addressed.
By utilizing the well and a fire pump, the water situation will be adequately
handled. The wet retention pond, if it indeed does remain wet, can be utilized as
a back-up resource, providing it is kept cleared.
All buildings, including those in the future expansion plan, are within proper
distances from the proposed location of the fire hydrant.
The building footprints now indicate they will be less than 3,500 square feet.
There are no further comments at this time.
,./.
... . . fJI
.
ATTACHMENT C