Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008 11 10 Public Hearings 505 First Reading Ordinance 2008-26 Amending Comp. Plan and Capital Improvement ElementCITY COMMISISON ITEM 505 November 10, 2008 Meeting Consent Information Public Hearin X Re ular //` Mgr./Dept REQUEST: The Community Development Department -Planning Division requests that the City Commission hold a Public Hearing for First Reading of Ordinance 2008-26, amending the Comprehensive Plan to incorporate revisions and the annual update to the Capital Improvement Element (CIE) required by Rule 9J-5.016 FAC and Chapter 163, Part II, F.S. and amending other elements of the plan as needed to ensure internal consistency. PURPOSE: Annual update (with needed revisions) of the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) in order to maintain a financially feasible 5-year schedule of capital improvements (SCI) as required by the Florida Statutes. The previous CIE [Exhibit `A-1' to the ordinance] is being replaced in its entirety (as indicated by the page strike-out). The new CIE [Exhibit `A' to the ordinance] includes an Introduction and the Goals, Objectives and Policies and Tables. The required Supporting Data and Analysis (included in the previous CIE), will be incorporated into an appendix of material for transmittal to the State. Highlights of this material will be included in a power point presentation by Staff as part of this agenda item. APPLICABLE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY: Florida Statute 163.3174 (4). (The LPA is responsible for monitoring and overseeing the comprehensive planning program. ) Florida Statute 163.3177 (3)(a). (contents of the Capital Improvements Element) Florida Statute s. 163.3164 (32). (definition of "financial feasibility") Florida Statute s. 163.3180. (concurrency) Florida Statutes 166 041 Procedures for adoption of ordinances and resolutions. Florida Administrative Code 9J-5.016. Capital Improvements Element. The purpose of the capital improvements element is to evaluate the need for public facilities as identified in the other comprehensive plan elements and as defined in the applicable defmitions for each type of public facility, to estimate the cost of improvements for which the local government has fiscal responsibility, to analyze the fiscal capability of the local government to finance and construct improvements, to adopt financial policies to guide the funding of improvements and to schedule the funding and construction of improvements in a manner necessary to ensure that capital improvements are provided when required based on needs identified in the other comprehensive plan elements. The element shall also include the requirements to ensure that an adequate concurrency management system will be implemented by local governments pursuant to Rule 9J- 5.0055, F.A.C., of this chapter. November 10, 2008 Public Hearing Item 505 Page 2 of 3 Winter Springs Charter Section 4.15.Ordinances in General. Winter Springs Article III. Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Section 15-37. Local Plannine Aeencv Review and Recommendation: CHRONOLOGY: Oct. 23, 2008- Local Planning Agency held a public hearing and made recommendation of Adoption. Nov. 06, 2008- Public Noticing in Orlando Sentinel of Adoption Public Hearing. Nov. 10, 2008- First Reading of Ordinance 2008-26 amending the Comprehensive Plan to incorporate revisions and the annual update to the CIE. CONSIDERATIONS: In 1985, the Growth Management Act required each municipality to adopt local government Comprehensive Plans to guide future growth and development; In 2005, Senate Bi11360 amended requirements of growth management laws; and in 2007, Statutes were amended by House Bi117203. Florida Statutes require each municipality to annually update (and revise as needed) their Capital Improvements Element (CIE) in order to maintain a financially feasible 5-year schedule of capital improvements. Failure to adopt the CIE amendment will result in the State prohibiting the City from adopting future land use amendments. Failure to meet obligations identified in the CIE may result in sanctions by the Administration Commission including ineligibility for grants. The CIE amendment includes an assessment of the current operating conditions of the concurrency related facilities (sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, potable water, parks and recreation, schools, and transportation facilities) to identify current deficiencies and a projection of future operating deficiencies to identify needed capital improvements. (A deficiency is a facility or service that does not meet (i.e., is operating below) the adopted LOS Standard.) The CIE amendment also includes revisions to out of date goals, objectives and policies required by Rule 9J-5.016 FAC and Chapter 163, Part II, F.S. Because, internal consistency must be maintained within the Comprehensive Plan, amendments to other elements are included where necessary, to maintain consistency with the CIE. A major component to the CIE amendment is the Schedule of Capital Improvements (SCI). Rule 9J- 5.003(12), FAC defines "capital improvements" as physical assets "which are large scale and high in cost... generally non-recurring and may require multi-year financing." The SCI includes capital projects greater than $50,000 that are necessary to achieve and maintain LOS standards, reduce existing deficiencies, provide for necessary replacements, and meet future demand during the time period covered by the SCI. Only projects required to maintain the LOS standards identified in the Comprehensive Plan are included in the SCI. Florida Statutes require the SCI to be financially feasible. Supporting data and analysis must demonstrate that sufficient revenues are currently available or will be available from "committed funding sources" to fund the projects included in the first three (3) years ofthe SCI. Projects in years four (4) and five (5) may be funded from sources that are either "committed "or "planned". ("Committed" revenue is an existing source and amount of revenue currently available to the City; "Planned" revenue is revenue that requires a referenda or other action, such as securing a grant.) November 10, 2008 Public Hearing Item 505 Page 3 of 3 Although any project included in the SCI represents a pledge by the City to pursue its implementation, planning for projects included in the first three (3) years of the SCI must be sufficiently advanced in order to determine the year of construction and to ensure that funding from a committed source is allocated to the project. A CIE amendment is required to change the scheduled year of construction of a project (sec. 163.3177(3)(b)1, F.S.) If the annual update demonstrates that LOS standards will not be met within the 5-year schedule, then the local government must adopt either a long term concurrency management system or planning strategies in the CIE to address these deficiencies. FINDINGS: ^ The amendment demonstrates that the City's LOS standards will be maintained during the next 5-year planning period. ^ The amendment is financially feasible meaning that sufficient revenues are currently available or will be available from committed funding sources to fund the projects included in the first three (3) years; ^ Internal consistency within the Comprehensive Plan is maintained; ^ The CIE amendment is exempt from the normal biannual Comprehensive Plan Amendment Cycle. No Transmittal Hearing is required, only an Adoption Hearing [Sec. 163.3177(3)(b)2, F.S. and Sec. 163.3187(1)(f), F.S.]. ^ The adopted amendment must be submitted to DCA no later than December 1, 2008. LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY RECOMMENDATION: At a special meeting of the Local Planning Agency on October 23, 2008, the Board voted unanimously to recommend adoption of Ordinance 2008-26. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Commission hold a Public Hearing for First Reading of Ordinance 2008-26, amending the Comprehensive Plan to incorporate revisions and the annual update to the Capital Improvement Element (CIE) required by Rule 9J- 5.016 FAC and Chapter 163, Part II, F.S. and amending other elements of the plan as needed to ensure internal consistency. ANTICIPATED IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE: Nov. 24, 2008- Second Reading/Adoption Public Hearing for Ordinance 2008-26, amending the Comprehensive Plan to incorporate revisions and the annual update to the CIE. Dec. 1, 2008- Statutory deadline for submittal of adopted amendment to Florida DCA. ATTACHMENTS: A. Minutes from the Local Planning Agency Meeting B. Public Noticing in the Orlando Sentinel C. Ordinance 2008-26 with Amendment CITY COMMISSION ACTION: ATTACHMENTA CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY SPECIAL MEETING OCTOBER 23, 2008 CALL TO ORDER The Planning and Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency Special Meeting of Thursday, October 23, 2008 was called to Order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Robert L. Heatwole in the Commission Chambers of the Municipal Building (City Hall, 1126 East State Road 434,Winter Springs, Florida 32708). Roll Call: Chairman Robert L. Heatwole, present Vice Chairman Charles Lacey, absent Board Member Rosanne Karr, arrived at 7:03 p.m. Board Member Edward Martinez, present Board Member William H. Poe, present A moment of silence preceded the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC INPUT No one spoke. Board Member Rosanne Karr arrived at 7: 03 p. m. PUBLIC HEARINGS AGENDA PUBLIC HEARINGS 500. Community Development Department -Planning Division Requests That The Local Planning Agency Hold A Public Hearing For Consideration Of Ordinance 2008-26, Amending The Comprehensive Plan To Incorporate Revisions And The Annual Update To The Capital Improvement Element (CIE) Required By Rule 9J-5.016 FAC (Florida Administrative Code) And Chapter 163, Part II, F.S. (Florida Statutes) And Amending Other Elements Of The Plan As Needed To Ensure Internal Consistency. Ms. Eloise Sahlstrom, ASLA, AICP, Senior Planner, Community Development Department presented this Agenda Item and displayed a PowerPoint presentation on this Agenda Item. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY SPECIAL MEETING -OCTOBER 23, 2008 PAGE 2 OF 4 Ms. Sahlstrom stated, "If we do not update our CIE (Capital Improvements Element) the State can sanction us and make us not eligible for Grants." Continuing, Ms. Sahlstrom distributed to the Board Members information entitled "Table VIII-1 City of Winter Springs Five Year Schedule of Capital Improvements (SCI) FY 2008/09-2012/13", and also included information entitled, "Transportation Element". Discussion. Next, the Comprehensive Plan "Capital Improvements Element" was discussed. Board Member Edward Martinez asked, "Do you know -the total acreage for recreation that the City has right now?" Ms. Sahlstrom answered, "If you would like, I can bring that to the next Meeting." Board Member Martinez responded, "Okay please." Further discussion. Regarding the Tuscawilla Country Club project, Board Member Martinez asked about a Traffic Study and asked, "Do you know if that Traffic Study was done?" Ms. Sahlstrom replied, "I can guarantee to you that the City Engineer will make sure that they have to have a Traffic Study that it is done and generally it is done before it goes to Commission. The one that did not have the Traffic Study was the day care that came last time." Board Member Martinez asked, "Could you check for me?" Ms. Sahlstrom remarked, "Sure." Board Member William H. Poe noted, "Looking at the Agenda, it talks about a Public Hearing and then an Adjournment. Is there some Action that we need to take this evening, because it is not indicated on here as to what Action is required of the Planning and Zoning Board(/Local Planning Agency) in regard to this particular item?" Ms. Sahlstrom replied, "The Staff Recommendation - `And make a Recommendation'." Board Member Poe reaffirmed, "I thought so." Tape I/Side B With further discussion, Board Member Rosanne Karr asked, "What is happening with the Lynx Bus routes? Ms. Sahlstrom responded by saying, "I need to call and find out." Next, the "Transportation Element" was discussed. Chairman Heatwole called a recess at 7.•SO p.m. The Special Meeting was called back to Order at 8.•00 p. m. Further discussion ensued on Sidewalks. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA MINIJTES PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY SPECIAL MEETING -OCTOBER 23, 2008 PAGE 3 OF 4 With further discussion on public Park acreage, Ms. Sahlstrom added, "I will bring that at the next Meeting, so you have it." Chairman Heatwole opened the "Public Input "portion of this Agenda Item. No one spoke. Chairman Heatwole closed the "Public Input "portion of this Agenda Item. Regarding the acreage at the School Facilities, Ms. Sahlstrom added, "I will bring all that analysis to you to see." "I RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO INCORPORATE REVISIONS IN THE ANNUAL UPDATE TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT REQUIRED BY THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE AS PRESENTED BY STAFF." MOTION BY BOARD MEMBER POE. SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER MARTINEZ. DISCUSSION. VOTE: BOARD MEMBER KARR: AYE CHAIRMAN HEATWOLE: AYE BOARD MEMBER MARTINEZ: AYE BOARD MEMBER POE: AYE MOTION CARRIED. Ms. Sahlstrom pointed out that, "We will be having a Meeting on November 5`h, [2008]." ADJOURNMENT C[TY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA MIMJ'I'ES PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY SPECIAL MEETING -OCTOBER 23, 2008 PAGE 4 OF 4 Chairman Heatwole adjourned the Special Meeting at 8:10 p.m. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: JOAN L. BROWN DEPUTY CITY CLERK APPROVED: ROBERT L. HEATWOLE, CHAIRMAN PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY NOTE: These Minutes were approved at the , 2008 Regular Planning And Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency Meeting. a rNURSC~r oaoerat 9, zoos F3 ATTACHMENT B THIN larldovmlri~vrlfilin Me tflck~ er~Ilii fecund of Iwo ricd• You may obtain o copy or 9pp;a;,a'e_~c~.re~odi.._. JOAN ~~ ~ FTER ay t Cermrdry Owel• InYYa fM le0al pruwrtY dacrlp• prdlnoneeJResolutlon , P o n IfI, FIRST a ^eal lstrlet (The •D{ AN F TIDE p~ flop by ta)))rs ins Comp• odoPti amendment • THIS t~lct') or Ionds oenarally A G C NO tlerC1erkofO}M Boa~of WSFW~p ding and uo- w, described os rnmorlsina Tot~Ita 0 wn CommiuloMn, 107• datlna the~~lpppl Comdpre• ANDS motelviNA~ arei pOgprie ~ N 1 ~ Sout~hoRoioi,ntl Avmuoer Orovlvne9 Plonsmlttal of iM De~f~ndri ~f~~ et ol., NOT Iv located in fCoM C^y of WNNr R 0~ ourlh floor; Orlando, report to tM Department of FOR- 6erNa, Orensot a~m~eeff Ida N PIIO U1' ~ FNwida. CommunlfY AHatn. advrs n 1N E tM IanYOwMrs will M ~eld EtDE~YS1 M amt I CopNs of wid rssoluflon In M publi- ror th apurpose of electing t0 D tYMn el fM for In whl it was is three pal auperviwrs. AAANNNA6 M Yes pdoptegtnare pvac able for NOTN;E lE NAY OIYBI pures- t IYEY ~i public InspeCcfloe c~T the el• onf tp an Order a Summa Oeb: Nwerler 62001 T E I errs a Ia of tM Dlstrict, 1900 kilo- ry FIMI Judoment of tore• Tlexr 1!1 P 1 Npp M r~ ie tN Plaza Bou ev0rd, Loke cWSUre dated SeptemWr )7, Pleas: Isre ere) NtN OVID ~eaMes ewna Vista, fllorlda. 2001, and entered In Case d Ner fa AN M eysa seeA M N o. 2D01• 19 C C I UC N d ~ I1LT Infested parts may epprl 4 M N Meee, gy; Angela Rao, Clerk M700KA~~19XX~XXX of 2q r >Itree6 appear and be heard rs• Ree0v CrNk tM Clrcu t ourt In pod for M poroing s pcopy of 1M Yes e~ ~prp~e. Imaovsment Dlstrict ~ V luslo Coypt Florida' Or 6 R 21111 proDOU~•rdlnance Is tNpklp x tllt A~En~x,{~es~eeeeewl wRere(n SA~ULR kA LOAN sous Each IandoWMr may vote 0 flciWeCltvf HaII~ryPerloni etli•~ei sl tn'Oh e ~ OSCBl9P53 1011, 9, 1008 3pndRVRpgBER~ isH~NnRY In person or by written wishlnY to appeal any deci• tyr~Wrr~ kite sdxte~~ 5 HAAF; RUTH L proxy. Proxy roans ma be Ion made tlurln/ the hear Ix • SI s~tN r N AA F • U N K N O W N 62]00 obrolned upon reaues~ at InD will toed a record o/ ins Ysds eeleeld Iqe le I F le YOU WILL TAKE NOTICE ,~~NANT~ N0. 1; UN- the of ice of the I:irlct ppro4eedinps Intluding the deeeer een kkrre ~p N ~t on Nhdexde~ teNerYer K OWN TENANT NO 2; 10A6 Mona er, located at 201 tesl~Atony and evidence on px erx Mire el IWt1F et 1:20 p.r., he eedv and A L UNKNOWN East f~lne Sircet Suite 95o which 1M qppea is Dosed. Greek Improvetrunt Dls- pAR I L5 ``AIMING IN• Orlando FL ]20b1. At >al~ Persons with tl~sabllitles trlct Board of Supervisors TEReTS S @cV, TI{Rp{~ H, mee11M Lath Ipndownar a needing ossiftLance to par- Mao rrha O. Havnis, County pPprowd ae~aM readin0 pl UNOE~~R ~GAINS~ A hislher proxy shall be soli- Hclpate In Mis public M r C roller Ordinance/Resolution 101011- NAM EF N ANT TO sled to cast one vote per .In9 should canton iM CP As lark of the Board of adoptinD amendment p THIS C 10 R HAV• acre of land ownetl by hIM Clerk's Office O (q7~ 216. 4ounsr Commiseloners WSFWP orMndinO and up• I G OR CLAD ING T Mr and located wRNln the 225E of Nast 21 Myre n ad• on9e Wnry, Florida doting 1M RCID Compre• AVE pgNN1Y RI T, TITLOE ET• Dlstrict for each Person vents of the mating. henslve Plon 7001, on ap• ~O~~NTEYEEES RINNTHE elected. A Traction o+ an OLS85]9/9 11)q proving tranemltfol oft IS~CIt PERT N DEEE••. Otre shall W,treatld as OM DLSI51221 IDN report t0 tM DeparltMnf Ig ~ e anft TV aerc, Community AMaln. will 1o Met f>d on claw. 1o a/a1, at t seN~ of a mmedlately toll In the D m., the Orlando C11V CoPI 1 of ~d r fgluflon In w~soblddK cosh ja o0ww DD Council wIIt Id a Public 1M Zarm in wh~Ch It was CCooAAuu Ol to all an wners maetinj thgre Hearing In C tr Coue II ado fey) a~~vallpble fof ~orth Ia oma Av nue, most will be convened a rwu ar ~, e~ty N bPc t~l o't on at the~T m D• S 2nd ~loor, meta nD of f W Boad of Cha~ r~, pn Flr., ~~ C~~ ~ pu I Clerk a ~Pn~~rmEe_~ m, rtihi Led I Su Hall, ~ W Avers {Ire o/ • sFrkt i90D De M F 710 pervlsars. The meNlnO Is qnp~ W NM is M Ivan Mof Id a a I t Vb ~, open ro the alit and will ~1 L 7W01 to consld~ t ss of fM • Plaza Bou eva0rrd, Loke lusla bounty for 1 ~e ar he a two reQ Buena Vista, laib. ,pns• De tnndut n scardonce f°~ RDI NC • C tY o Deltono lorlaa, B~1 sue. r Yr ds- 0000• wHh iM yrovNione o, FIOrI• InGS ot• N ~ w II MId o Pu I(c H rl BEIL 1188, tM Ilowln9 de- efed ro De. OF THE CITY OF n0 By: AnONo Rao, CNrk tryb d pro erfv a set da Law r CCo mars fv Nrla, p 2E f~op8 st • p t ride, vflopmenl Dldr~cri. A copy ~Q ~ANTING YY 0 • ~p~s, a7 tM fy pf Delta. Reedy C-eelt ~h In eafd Order of Final ,the °T iM agenda for Lois meet• r~1 A FLViRI DA L M• I C Improvement Dlstrkf f In1 may w obtained from I ED LIABILI Y COM~A• to atW a~se~M L hk tm1~~. Ju Imeflt, fo-wl the the Oletrlct Man eer at 1 NY A NQ -EXCLUSIV Drciv, Det F~ar~OO, fo OORt/99SS 10/1, 9, 2001 010n7 sp~ppRSpN~ ~w ~r €ast Plr,t¢tregt4 Su/te 950, eRANC~ I ~.•Q.~.., I~~ ansTder thIlowlM re• 61p~ /UT illlAE~ ' TM mMfl may w contln. rv A v wA T pnd uP d to a ngota, time, Ond WI M M OF IM, 2101•tl •TM Clfv a ~ a LL N Iilona ~loltreceigved a EpRf C G Re• Liao ofs fnldenncedoby mo FRANOHISE BT DU 118 ram S 11 110.617.01 (f~ T8R T E Walt a bbjj f Np Cp TT onln v oton a re ue AN OR INANOE OF THE ANYIP IU OENS LNIATIFNiRE iwatec IBOard Aeri moY be ~~f~ TE~ 5 ANO1 ONDITIOH01 D tO u~low on ocassory CITY ~OM OIS 1 T F FRO TH nter T u MER y~MI HA IS,UCpH ~IdinO o siructun Orsat• H C TTTY FSA E ~i. PpMer O A r tkan 1 Go souare fN~e} In P 1N~6 E li D T slovliorha will) porlicipate bV FR NCHI~EVIDI LG FO ~loor a-ea~ ~ ~ f' ~~0~~ ~~ ~ THE PRO ERTY De telWhone. ERATE• P ttat doss rMt t- NTY ~ FL RID g~d RA5OFT E E - of SEVERAgILITY 9NND NR lowfMtarM Ion and UOPT)NG A ARO Me 1 PENpEpN3 rrs. EFFECTIVE DATE. InNr- ~° ~°l~t~~ Mf a n• S AL COMPREH SI ~ MUST FILE A CLAIM Pursuant to pravis ons of c pal Ftructure Includln0 F A TT88X A NENyp yy THIN d0 DDAYS AFFFTEER ~ tM Americans with ~isobli• esrpd parfla may apppps~Opr but nm Ilmltsd ~p strutters 0d~TO NTCO~p R TE T~E SALE. INes Act, env person requir• an be hsarO resyartllne mObrlal extsrlor flnlt`h~, E RE~ISIONS ~ND Ins spacial actommodotlon some. A <eDY of tM Pr ntl rooftop. Laotian: t29 7H ANNUAL u DA EE ATT8NT1Oq PER ON5 rrt fo rNCipptt in this mNt• Posse Ordlnana is avaH• g Ivlo Drlw, Dtlron , Fla• TO THE CAPIT L fM- WITH pIS~B•ILITIf~•.~S IF in9~ asked fo adv the able In 1M Clty Clerk's Of• i~a• AoallcQn qq: Wlll~am R. PROV ENT E`~tdENT• YO ARE A PBRSON Dlstrict Office al (~ 811- tics, Clty Nall. Persons ~pft and 71flan M. Scott MAK1 CONFOpRMpIN+Gt W tlDSOIS~ABIgLCITCypNy~ly,~-{O 'U°' 5511 at Nost flue calendar wish,ng to aDppRRaal onY deCl• (PrOjlCt No. VROy1-008). AMENMBN TST F THfE g~~1ONAINYORDER TO dpYa prior to the meeting, si0n mods durlne iM r REEL EN N T If vou,ore hearing or InOwlllneedarecadof~ Alllntesfedportlesoreln• pEl,gN 0 NSUppE IN• ARTI (PATE I HIS rote speech impoplretl please Proceedings Including fM vlied ro ~Mk fMir am- THRNAL eONSI4TF0}fCY• PROCEEDING YOU qRE conf~ct tM Florio Relpv tssfimonv and evidence on ,Mob, vsws ~oblectlo~s PROVIDING FCCCR HE NTIT EEEp /~rf NO COST 1e" Serv ce (100) 955. 770, who which The a I Is br~1pp~~ t tM D/II-ono Comm s• R PEAL OF INC NsIS• 0 YO Tb THE PROVI- ~ a! con aid you in cantactine Persons wit~i daisobll tlei soon of part of the Public T NT OR~INANC A D IONN k C RTA N ASS r~ct the Dlstrict Office. ne00ding oa Istonce to Par• Hearing. The failure o/ a R SOLUTIpNS ~/~Np ISTANCE, pELEAS~ CUN a 6 hclpote In =his PubUc De~1ar person t appear during ¢ ILIffiY INCb ORRAE• ACTTpCOURTSADMIN3IpSp• Guth aoPtenal cmnac/Ondtalensa ClirkhfuOftlcitOt(~7 216 ~Id publMCrhsOrl~pso^pa in HI NSIVTrBPLAENCA EF~ OURTNOtISEUfA~EX~ Or- these meetin s Is af~vise 11 1231, at least 21 tours n ad• Kr N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' r A H, FL pp d d vontt of the meeling.~ wr{flog ro sold case mayy se• F CTIV ATE ~ ND L 115 ORA GE AVE., !old toot person will need a rs- v lY ratrltt the ability f .G/~ L 5 A US F TH pDAY p A EE CC Ilad tad of the proceetlines pntl such o Oarwn ro crontest 9t PLAN AMENDMENTS. M111 T Jld-7S7.6096 of that accprtlingly, iM person OLSB51161 IOl9 at a later dote. WITHIN W 2 WORK- ly ma~need to ensure tttaT a n cto , a ~ T ING DAY OF YbUR RE- wr Lim record of the wo• TM opplicafrom and asaoci• IPT 0 THEN TILE for qm., the Orlando City CE oo I A ceedlnps is made, Including Council will hold o Public atetl paPerwak may be In• OF ACTIONISA E; IF VOU the teatlmonv ontl evidence M upon which such appeal Is Hearing In Clty Council soetbd by Me public at the ARF~ HEAR NG IM• to be based. Chambersy, 2nd, Flr., City Ocpartment of Develop• PAI E~D CALL 1.800.955• Hall, 100 5. Oran a Avenue, menf Servlc s 2213 Provi- 8771.1 S'OU ARE VOICE the Orlando, F ]200~ro consld~ dente Blvd.,3sf tbor, pelfo• ! S, IM~AIREtD, CALL 1. 00- ere ertheaee d s n nor, lorido. Monde FrI- 6e 933.8770 HIS I NO A Su- Georoe S. FIiM EBi ~~ F y P S far Manager Govarnmentol p D Ap ~ day, 8:00 a.m. S:DO p.m. Thor ropaaetl ortllnonce COURT INFORMATION Management Services'- For further Information may inspected by Inbr• LINE Centro) Florida, LL of S ssF1~1 1 f)f ORDIN(Ijl ontaet the CI of Deltona ested Partial between 1 rtes CORAS1161 1019, 10+16 TIiEA R NON~NNT r^ T ~svslopment ~ervlces De• o.m, and S p.m., Monday Dated of Dal2nd, Florida, • P ppoprlrmnt at (td) 078.8100. through Frlda of the on SEPTEMBER 25, 1001. of Not ce o Londownera - TM dates, timed and plocea Ctty's erk•s Of Ic•, Ipt0 T I~ L µ tl of onv continucnce of the ed at 1C16 Eost tp ~ftaod DIANE M. MATDUSEK !ii Stevem Pliantation C DNE ~~ .above scheduled Public 111. W star SprlnyiFlarl• As CI rk Clrculf Court me Commutice Ot Landowners ¢ T hearing will w announud tla. For m re infarmatlon ICIRCUI~F 1.`OURT SEAL) ~et• Meellnp Stevens Ptamarlon r A of said public hearing and call (It17 3 7.180D M217. Per• gv: M S MocDOnald uD- Community Oevelorxnent 6E C no furtMr mfltt regarding Ions wit ~hablllfles need- As DePUty Clxk in District TIR `t RE P08• sale canlinuance Is requlreE Ing aulatarue to garlic) to . to w published. In any of tMse rocead~ Po N11R: u~r Notice is haraDyy Iven to all Daub Cn nge A ~~ mt landowners wivtnPn the Ste• ~ ~ d If any person decides to aP• •se RNotlonsf Deparfm1e^f 0 ox 11~ ~ ay yens Planfaflorl Community ~ D AiiF peal on deci0lon made by Coordlnota, 10 Iqurs In od- FL Loudsrdole, pis Develoomant Dlatrlct, for Y E. Interestetl Port es may the Del~ono Clty C"mmis- ante of the m••sting of Fl ~•301p1 to Ionds eenerallY bounded on appear and be heard re• lion wltn re~pect to any 1011 ]17.1100, Extsnslon Prato (951) 561.0071 on the west Dy Canoe Creek larding same. A copy W the matter cansi rep ~f such ~. his Is o DuDllc hsor• oy Rood between 17th Sfraet ProPOaed Ordinance is Marl^0, M or sM w II need ng. If you decide to oppeel VOL/56118 ION, 10116 ei• and Deer Run Rood and on ova labN in tM City Clerk's a reard a iM praeed nOS onv recotnmendatlo ec xn iM northeast bpyy tM City of 0ftics, Cify Nall. Persona Intludlnp oN testlmonv and cclan mae• by the Lpcol c., St. Cloud londflll, contoln• wlahrlns to aPpspot onv decl• evidence, upon whicX the Plonnlnl Agenty wltD r • IN THE CIRCUIT COU T e, Ing approxlmatN 590 acres sloe made durlrr fM hwr• Appeal is 0a Ds posed IF.S, spscf b an ma» aoMltl- N UB da located In Ostao~o County, fop will need y rscad of tM 10s•01O5>• To iMf /ntl, eucA ersd al th~i mesftng you ~~UNTY FLORRDA AN~E no Florida, advi4flnp Tkat a Proceadings In~lyyding tM Q~r~a!~ will wont to smure will need o rscorQ o9 the maatlnY Of la^tloWMn will Ialim0^Y slid QVIdMtd Off 'nor, u vflhaittn flterE O} PrOaldMga, end (Or,WCh ~~N~ bpPP h•la for tt~s Pur of whlcn Ma owl Is based tM uracssdf Ism de• Tha pu-po~s, you mpg Mss b ns eNCtfng three Superv~ars. Per1one w~h dlsa~llitlsi Clty doss m~ prov~ds thla emure that a wrbotlm r~- SIDE NOEEE IOAIIt, INC. vI• ne~Cing ossi tans o par• vx m record. card of the prosedlnla s le• Dafs:NowmWr e, 2001 tIcpate n M~s wpllc r• made upon whltA tM ap• PIaIn1H1, a- 1me:6:00 P.M. I Per Qns with dlwbilltbs pool Is based. Iotars•tsd of Ploct.imm Hall,t]rtl floor, CI rk iuO(1Ia 1107) IF ^~InO,asslstanNl to par• Oaribs ors advised that w• NN ~St+ ??~l, at least 11 ry In ad• tic NI any M these Wo- 1hsV mOY p Paar Of thF ii ~t~Cloud, Fb~o vonce of fM ne. ~~e~ 1111 of d~VO~ l0 r plc~to tmlhs~ IaM• Iv Eah IandowMr may vote OL3151265 1M9 waklrq flays b ~ SL3856x06 1Dq tr in Ptr on or by wrltt n 1 aje(~j ~~pp, ,A, and ATTACHMENT C ORDINANCE N0.2008-26 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, ADOPTING A LARGE SCALE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT TO INCORPORATE THE REVISIONS AND THE ANNUAL UPDATE TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT; MAKING CONFORMING AMENDMENTS TO OTHER ELEMENTS OF THE PLAN TO ENSURE INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS, SEVERABILITY, INCORPORATION INTO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND LEGAL STATUS OF THE PLAN AMENDMENTS. WHEREAS, section 163.3161 et. seq., Florida Statutes (1987) established the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act; and WHEREAS, section 163.3167, Florida Statutes, requires each municipality in the State of Florida to prepare and adopt a Comprehensive Plan as scheduled by the Florida Department of Community Affairs; and WHEREAS, section 163.3177(3)(a),F1orida Statutes, provides that the comprehensive plan shall contain a capital improvements element, which shall include a component that outlines certain principles for construction, extensions, and increases in capacities of public facility, as well as outlines for correct public facility deficiencies, and that such component is required to cover a least a five (5) year period; and WHEREAS, section 163.3177(3)(b)1, Florida Statutes, provides that said capital improvements element shall be reviewed on an annual bases and modified as necessary in order to maintain a financially feasible five (5) year schedule of capital improvements; and WHEREAS, said statutory provisions also require an amendments to the comprehensive plan in order to update the schedule on an annual basis or to eliminate, defer, or delay the construction for any facility listed in the five (5) year schedule; and WHEREAS, section 163.3187(1)(f), Florida Statutes, exempts comprehensive plan amendments that change the schedule in a capital improvements element, or are directly related to the schedule, from the biannual comprehensive plan amendment cycle; and WHEREAS, section 163.3177(3)(b)2,F1orida Statutes, provides that capital improvements element amendments shall only require an adoption hearing before the City Commission, and that no transmittal to the Department of Community Affairs is required; and WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency of the City of Winter Springs held a duly noticed City of Winter Springs Ordinance 2008-26 Page 1 of 4 public hearing on October 23, 2008, in accordance with the procedures in Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, on the proposed comprehensive plan amendment and considered findings and advice of staff, citizens, and all interested parties submitting written and oral comments; and WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency recommended the City Commission adopt the large scale comprehensive plan text amendment; and WHEREAS, the City Commission hereby finds that this Ordinance is in the best interests of the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Winter Springs, Florida; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are fully incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. Authority. This Ordinance is adopted in compliance with, and pursuant to, the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, Sections 163.3167 and 163.3187, Florida Statutes. Section 3. Purpose and Intent. The purpose and intent of this ordinance is to adopt the large scale comprehensive plan text amendment incorporating the revisions of the annual update to the City of Winter Springs Capital Improvements Element ("CIE") as part of the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan, as required by section 163.3177, Florida Statutes. Section 4. Adoption of Large Scale Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment. The City Commission of the City of Winter Springs hereby amends the Comprehensive Plan as follows: A. Capital Improvements Element. The existing Capital Improvements Element is hereby repealed in its entirety. The repealed Capital Improvements Element is attached hereto as "Exhibit A-1," for reference purposes only. The "Capital Improvements Element, November 2008," attached hereto and fully incorporated herein by this reference as "Exhibit A," is hereby adopted into the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan. B. Transportation Element. The Transportation Element is amended as set forth in "Exhibit B," attached hereto and fully incorporated herein by this reference. (Underlined type indicates additions and strikeout type indicates deletions of text in the Comprehensive Plan). C. Infrastructure Element. The Infrastructure Element is amended as set forth in "Exhibit C," attached hereto and fully incorporated herein by this reference. (Underlined type indicates additions and strike~tt type indicates deletions of text existing in the Comprehensive Plan). D. Recreation and Open Space Element. The Recreation and Open Space Element is City of Winter Springs Ordinance 2008-26 Page 2 of 4 amended as set forth in "Exhibit D," attached hereto and fully incorporated herein by this reference. (Underlined type indicates additions and stri~eottt type indicates deletions of text existing in the Comprehensive Plan). Section 5. Repeal of Prior Inconsistent Ordinances and Resolutions. All prior inconsistent ordinances and resolutions adopted by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, or parts of ordinances and resolutions in conflict herewith, are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict. Section 6. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, word or provision of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, whether for substantive, procedural, or any other reason, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. Section 7. Incorporation Into Comprehensive Plan. Upon the effective date of the Comprehensive Plan Amendments adopted by this Ordinance, said Amendments shall be incorporated into the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan and any section or paragraph number or letter and any heading may be changed or modified as necessary to effectuate the foregoing. Section 8. Effective Date and Legal Status of the Plan Amendment. The effective date of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment adopted by this Ordinance shall be the date a final order is issued by the Florida Department of Community Affairs, or the date of the Administration Commission finding the Amendment in compliance with section 163.3184, Florida Statutes. No development orders, development permits, or land use dependent on this Amendment may be issued or commenced before it has become effective. If a final order of noncompliance is issued by the Administration Commission, the Amendment may nevertheless be made effective by adoption of a resolution affirming its effective status. After and from the effective date of this Amendment, the Comprehensive Plan Amendment set forth herein shall amend the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan and become a part of that plan and the Amendment shall have the legal status of the City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan, as amended. (ADOPTION PAGE FOLLOWS] City of Winter Springs Ordinance 2008-26 Page 3 of 4 ADOPTED by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, in a regular meeting assembled on the day of , 2008. JOHN F. BUSH, Mayor ATTEST: ANDREA LORENZO-LUACES City Clerk APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND SUFFICIENCY FOR THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS ONLY. ANTHONY A. GARGANESE City Attorney First Reading: Second Reading: Effective Date: Cite of Winter Springs Ordinance 2008-26 Page 4 of 4 EXHIBIT , I R-I CAPITAL VEMENTS ELEMENT / October 2001 Amended, July 2007 Amended, January 2008 Prepared For: City of Winter Springs Community Development Department 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708-2799 Prepared By: Land Design Innovations, Inc. 140 North Orlando Avenue, Suite 295 Winter Park, Florida 32789 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS A. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... .....1 B. INVENTORY OF NEEDS AND FUNDING SOURCES ................................. .......... ..2 1. Public Facility Needs ................................................................................. ................2 a. Public Education and Health Facilities ......................................................... ....................... ..2 b. Transportation ............................................................................................. ............................ .. 2 c. Sanitary Se~ver ........................................................................................ .................................. .. 3 d. Solid Waste ........................................................................................ ....................................... ..4 e. Drainage ....................................................................................... ............................................ ..4 £ Potable ~~'ater ......................................................................... .................................................. ..5 g. Recreation/Open Space ................................................. ....................................................... ..6 2. Funding Source Definitions .................................. .....................................................6 a. General Fund Revenue Sources .......................... .................................................................. ..7 b. Other Revenue Sources .................................. ........................................................................ ..7 C. PUBLIC FACILITY ANALYSIS ................ ....................................................................9 1. Current Practices for Funding Capit provements ..................................................9 2. Impacts of Future School Needs o nfrastructure .......................................................9 3. Timing and Location of Capita rojects ......................................................................9 4. Financial Assessment ........... ..................................................................................... 10 a. Transportation ............... .......................................................................................................... 10 b. Sever ......................... ............................................................................................................... 11 c. ~~'ater .................... ..................................................................................................................... 11 d. Solid ~X~aste ..... .......................................................................................................................... 12 e. Drainage .... ................................................................................................................................ 12 £ Recreati and Open Space ............................................ ........................................................... 12 5. Forecas ' of Revenues and Expenditures ................................................................ 13 a. D Capacity ............................................................................................................................... 13 b. erating Expenses .................................................................................................................... 13 Summary of Projected Expenses and Revenues ..................................................................... 14 D. NCURRENCY MANAGEMENT .............................................................................. 14 OBJECTIVES,AND POLICIES .............................................................................29 VIII-i CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT LIST OF TABLES Table VIII-1: Inventory of Public Schools (See Public School Facility Element, Tables I~-3) ................................................................................................................................ Table VIII-2: City of Winter Springs Capital Improvements Schedule FY 2000/01-2 Table VIII-3: Projection of Ad Valorem Tax Revenues ................................................... Table VIII-4: Projections of Non-Ad Valorem Tax Revenues ................................... Table VIII-5: Projections of Debt Service Obligations for Outstanding Bond Is s Table VIII-6: Projection of Debt Capacity .............................................................. ....... Table VIII-7: Projections of Operating Costs ..................................................... ........... IX- '-2, ...........14 O6 ..........1 ....................21 ......................22 ~~ ........................23 ........................23 Table VIII-8: Projected Total Expenditures by Fund .................................... .......................................24 Table VIII-9: Facility Program -Public School Facilities ......................... ..........................................24 Table VIII-10: School Capital Improvement Plan for Seminole Coun acilities - Additions/Remodeling .................................................................... .................................................24 Table VIII-11: School Capital Improvement Revenue Sources .... .....................................................24 Table VIII-12: Planned New Public School Facility Constructi .........................................................24 VIII-ii CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT CHAPTER VIII CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT A. INTRODUCTION The purpose of the Capital Improvements Element is to evaluate the need for pub ' facilities as identified in other Elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan. In additi the Capital Improvements Element will present an analysis of the fiscal capability of the Ci o fund needed public facilities, recommend financial policies to guide the funding those identified improvements, and to schedule the funding and construction of impro ents in a manner necessary to ensure that capital improvements are provided when required. Needed capital improvements are those that are necessary to meet adopted level of ser~rice standards identified in the Plan. 'These include: (Ord. 2007-22, 01-14-2008 • Transportation- Roadways which are under the jurisdictior~ the City, and those roadways which the City wishes to aid in funding improvements; • Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element -Sanitary sewer tre ent and effluent disposal facilities necessary to serve the existing and future ulation of the City. In addition, recommendations for capital improvements an licies to insure adequate sanitary sewer collection facilities; • Solid ~Y~aste Sub-Element -Solid waste di sal facilities to senrice the City's existing and future population, coordination with Se le County to ensure those facilities are available when needed, and recommendations fo dequate solid waste collection methods; • Drainage Sub-Element -Drainage ems necessary to meet recommended level of service standards for stormwater quality d conveyance, and coordination with Seminole County for improvements to systems ' sins which serne the City but axe outside its jurisdiction; • Potable ~Xlater Sub-Eleme -Potable water treatment facilities necessary to serve the existing and future pop don of the City. In addition, recommendations for capital improvements and poli ' to insure adequate potable water delivery facilities; • Recreation/Open ce - Recreation facilities and land azea necessary to meet the recommended lev f service standards.; and • Public School~Ccilities -School facilities which increase student capacity ensuring that the capacity of s ols is sufficient to support student growth. The Capital I vements Element will also present methods to implement and monitor Concurrency nagement as defined and required in Chapter 9J-5.003, 9J-5.016 & 9J-5.0055, Florida A strative Code (F.A.C.). VIII-1 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT B. INVENTORY OF NEEDS AND FUNDING SOURCES 1. Public Facility Needs The applicable elements have identified various capital improvements necessary to eet the recommended level of service standards. In addition, Chapter 9J-5.016, F.A.C. wires the City to assure adequate public facilities to ser~~ice public education and heal cilities. An assessment of the required public facilities is presented below. a. Public Education and Health Facilities There are no public health facilities located within the City ~ of ~Y~inter Springs. Therefore, an assessment of public facilities is not applicabl this Plan. The City's Fire Department provides Emergency Mana ent Services (EMS) and generally transports patients to South Seminole H ital in Longwood, Florida Hospital in Altamonte Springs and Winter Park Ho .EMS will transport to any hospital the patient requests, including hospitals ' owntown Orlando, Sanford and Florida Hospital in East Orange County. The Seminole County School Board operat ~ ty-seven (37) elementary schools, twel~*e (12) middle schools, and ten (10) ~ schools. These education facilities are included in the assessment of applicabl ublic school facilities (see Public School Facility Element, Table Iii-1, IX-2, an -3). (Ord. 2007-22; 01-14-2008) b. Trans~grtation All major roadways within the limits of Winter Springs are under the jurisdiction of the State of Florida, Se ole County or the City of Winter Springs. Using functional classifications es 'shed under Chapter 355, F.S., nineteen (19) roadways have been identified as 'cipal collectors, four (4) State arterials, one (1) County arterial and two (2) Co collectors. These roadways, along with all other classified roads, are listed in T II-1 in the Transportation Element Capital projects a been identified in the Transportation Element to make improvements -arious roadway segments and a schedule of these improvements is presented in le VIII-2. A general summary of e.dsting and future transportation system de ncies is as follows: VIII-2 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (1) Existing Transportation Deficiencies: State Road 419 from H~vy 17-92 to State Road 434 currently operates at LOS F a oes U.S. Hwy 17-92 from Shepard Road to State Road 419. (2) Future Transportation Deficiencies: The Transportati ement identifies several future transportation deficiencies associated corrective measures. Identified improvements are in ed for City, County and State roads. Future deficiencies includ .S. Hwy 17-92 north of Shepard Road; State Road 434 from St Road 419 to the Central Florida Greeneway (417); State Road 4 rom U.S. Hwy 17- 92 to Edgemon Avenue, and Shepard Road U.S. H~vy 17-92 to Sheoah Avenue. (3) Upgrades and Maintenance of Tran ottation System: Planned upgrades in the City's 5-Year Capital rovement Program include: S.R. 434/419 signal upgrades; Ci wide signal control and lens upgrades; stamped asphalt at inter Springs Boulevazd; and, Tuskawilla Road signal upgra .Other upgrades included various local dirt road paving. Pla maintenance includes yearly street resurfacing and maintenanc o the public works compound. c. unitary Sewer The Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element pr es an assessment of facility needs throughout the planning horizon. Also inclu in the Sub-Element is an analysis of existing deficiencies of the sanitary sewe eatment, effluent disposal, and collection systems. The determination of futures tart' sewer demand includes only those areas within the City limits of Winter gs. The City will coordinate sewer demand with surrounding cities and uni rporated Seminole County as needed. The City has a total de capacitlr of 4.237 NIGD, which includes the capacities of both the East ~~'as ater Treatment Plant (~~'irTP) and the «'est Wastewater Treatment Plant (l ). Capital projects necessary to meet demand within the first five-year capital ' rovement horizon (fiscal years ending 2005-2006) are specific to expansion of City's collection system and maintenance of existing system. A schedule of ital projects to maintain the current system and meet the projected demand i resented in Table VIII-2. A general summary of existing and future Sanitary wer System deficiencies is as follows: (1) Existing Sanitary Sewer Deficiencies: There are no existing deficiencies in the system. (2) Future Sanitary Seu~et Deficiencies: Future deficiencies are specific to the development of the proposed Town Center and associated Main Street. (3) Upgrades and Maintenance of the Sanitary Sewer System: Planned projects include the installation of a force main and lift stations to serc*e the proposed Town Center project. Other future projects include extensions of the force mains. Planned upgrades ~~III-3 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT include gas scrubber conversions to both treatment plants, autom bar screens at the East plant, installation of sand filter at the est plant, aeration upgrades, various lift station upgrades and East force main rerouting. Planned maintenance of the syste dudes installing a liner in the storage ponds, meter conversi for the reclaimed water system, pump maintenance/repla ents, roof replacements and various plant improvements. d. Solid ~fi~aste Solid AWaste is collected by a private hauler for disposal in e Seminole County landfill. Based on projections presented in the Solid Fast b Element, Seminole County has adequate landfill capacity to meet the City's ne through the year 2043. ~'~ general summary of existing and future Solid ~~'aste~ciencies is as follows: (1) Existing Solid iT7aste Defici~s: There are currently no deficiencies in the solid waste pro (2) Future Solid [haste De6cie es: Seminole County has adequate landfill capacity beyond the g period. Therefore, there are no future deficiencies for soli aste. (3) Upgrades aad Maint ance of Solid i~aste Program: The City franchises the solid to services to a private hauler. Upgrades and maintenance of franchise agreement and terms are the responsibility of General Services Director. e. Dr~a~e The City of `Winter Sp ' completed an inventory and analysis of its stormwater drainage systems thro a study that Ryas adopted as the City's Stormwater Master Plan. This plan, ~vhi addressed all aspects of the City's storm~vater system, was completed in 1992. veral prioritized capital improvements related to drainage have been identified ' e Stormwater Master Plan and axe explained in detail within the Drainage Ele Drainage s ems constructed to serve public right-of--ways are owned and maintaine y the City. Drainage systems in private subdivisions are owned and mains ~ by individual property owners or Homeowner's Associations. A s ule of capital projects to maintain the current system and meet the projected d nd is presented in Table VIII-2. A general summary of existing and future aina~e deficiencies is as follows: VIII-4 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT (1) Existing Drainage Deficiencies: Based on the 5-Year Ca Improvement Program, existing deficiencies in the drainages em includes underdrain installations, Little Lake Howell RCP vert installation and various other project listed in Capital Im vement Program. (2) Future Drainage Deficiencies: Future drainage deft ncies include the No Name Creek drainage swales and calve .Other future deficiencies map arise from private developme that are not the responsibility of the City and were installe riot to 1984 and maintained by individual homeowner's associ ns. (3) Upgrades and Maintenance of the D age System: Upgrades and maintenance of the drainage em includes inlet/outlet improvements and vehicles and equi nt necessary to maintain the systems. Potable hater The Potable Water Sub-Element states that City has adequate treatment facilities and well capacity to senrice the a ipated population and commercial establishments through the planning h on. In addition to the well capacity, the City has adequate storage capacity for ~ service area. The City has chosen to set a level senzce (LOS) for potable water delivery. This level of service will act as a quid determine the compatibility of land uses to the potable water delivery system. a basis fox determining the LOS is the ISO rating system for fire protection e City's capital improvement program includes numerous projects to mee e LOS for water delivery. A schedule of capital p cts to maintain the current system and meet the projected demand is presente Table ~~III-2. A general summary of existing and future Potable Water Syst deficiencies is as follows: (1) 'sting Potable [~atet Deficiencies: There are no existing eficiencies related to potable water consumption. However, there is a single fire flow deficiency in the system which is scheduled to be rectified. Future Potable I~aterDeficiencies: Future deficiencies are specific to the development of the proposed Town Center and associated Main Street. (3) Upgrades and Maintenance of the Potable Dater System: Planned projects include the installation of water mains to serve the project. Other future projects include extensions of the water mains and construction of a new well at water treatment plant #1 (eastern treatment plant). Upgrades to the system include chlorine conversions at water treatment plants #2 & #3, meter upgrades, electrical upgrades and S.R. 434 water main upgrade. Maintenance ~~III-5 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT includes water treatment plant #1 discharge piping and plant maintenance. g. Recreation/Open Space The City of Winter Springs has historically operated and twined a comprehensive parks and recreation program. An analysis contain within the Recreation and Open Space Element of the City's existing faciliti d projected needs revealed that most parks and recreation facilities are ade to to meet the needs of the City during the neat planning period. However, eed for additional facilities was found in some categories based upon future gxo~ projections. The City has set a standard for the location of park area elative to the type and service level of each park area. Map ~~I-2 in the R eation and Open Space Element, displays the ser<rice area for each park type. schedule of needed capital projects to implement the City's LOS standards for sand recreation is presented in Table VIII-2. A general summary of existin d future Parks and Recreation deficiencies is as follo~vs: (1) Existing Packs and Recre n Deficiencies: Currently, the City meets the adopted level of 'ce for park acreage. (2) Future Parks and Re eation Deficiencies: Future deficiencies will include park acrea for neighborhood and community parks. (3) Upgrades and intenance of the Parks and Recreation System: The ital improvement program outlines specific upgrades and tenance items fox parks and recreation, including lighting for ccer fields, park expansions, resurfacing basketball courts an aygrounds, mowers and replacement ~vork carts with 2. Funding Source The City of Wint prings has used numerous sources to fund capital projects in the past. Since ad on of the Comprehensive Plan in 1991, the City has employed methods des ed in the Capital Improvements Element in addition to its standard annual bu g procedures to allocate funds for specific purposes. An ove ew of various funding sources, which may be used for capital project fun ~ , is presented below. VIII-G CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT a. General Fund Revenue Sources (1) Ad Valorem Taxes (Property lases). Ad valorem taxes ~ ude revenue from non-exempt property taxation. The current e rate is 3.7708. (2) Franchise Fees. Franchise fees are levied upon a com yin return for pro~~iding service to ~~'inter Springs. The Ci currently has agreements covering gas and electric utilities. (3) Licenses, Permits and Fines. All businesses rating in the City obtain occupational licenses. Building pe are required for all construction. The City receives a portion o traffic citations issued in the City from Seminole County. (4) Intergovernmental Revenue. Intergov ental revenues are funds collected by the State or Coun nd shared with other local government units. Major sourc of shared revenue include the cigarette tax, State revenue sh g, beverage licenses, mobile home licenses, motor fuels tax, half- t sales tax and occupational licenses. (~) Interest Income. Interest ' come is revenue earned on funds that have been invested by ity. (6) Other Charges for S ces/User Fees. Charges for services pro~*ided by the City that aid by the users to fully or partially cover the costs to provid rvices. These fees generally include special fees placed on dev ers for processing plans and administrative fees for annexations. ther sources include miscellaneous rents, leases and sales. (7) L-utility es. Utility taxes are assessed on the users of water, electric, gas, pane and telephone. The City currently levies a utility tax of 10° or electric, gas, propane and water. The telephone utility tax is rentlp 7%. b. (1 Impact Fees. These fees are chazged concurrent with ne~v development and contribute towards payment for infrastructure needs, but not operational costs, which directly result from new development. Impact fees are currently assessed for police and fire protection, schools and transportation. (2) Special Assessments. Special assessments are levied against residents, agencies or districts that directly benefit from the new service or facility. (3) Enterprise Funds. Enterprise funds aze used to account for City services that are operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises where the intent is that the costs (expenses including VIII-7 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT depreciation) of providing goods and services to the general p c on a continuing basis be financed or recovered primarily thro ser charges. (-l) Local Option Gas Tax (LOGY). Seminole County prori the City with a portion of the gas tax in which the County es on gas consumption. The percentage is based on the City's pulation and can be used only for transportation related improve nts. (~) General Obligation Bonds. These bonds are ba d by the full faith and credit of the local government and mus approved by voter referendum. They offer low interest for c g less risk since they are secured by government taxing po .Capital improvements financed through general obligation b s should be used only for projects benefiting the whole City. (6) Revenue Bonds. Funds raised fro evenue bonds may be used for projects benefiting a specific gro since charges collected from users of the improvement are appli directly to the debt ser~rice on these bonds. In this respect th rojects are self-supporting. Revenue bonds pay higher interest d their issuance may be approved by the City Commission cvitho Toter approval. (7) Industrial Revenue ds. Though the local government issues these bonds, the debt is sumed by the companies or industries that use the revenues fo onstruction of utility plants or facilities. Because they are tax-e pt and lo~v interest, industries are attracted to this type of bo Local government can transfer the actual liability to pro~~ide ~ est while garnering employment and economic benefits for the unity. (8) Fed and State Grants and Loans. Federal funds are allocated to s agencies which administer block grants or disbursed as block nts directly to state and local agencies or other eligible rganizations. The purpose of the block grant program is to enable greater latitude by recipients in the actual use of the funds. These funds are generally anon-recurring source and cannot be accurately projected for budgeting purposes. In addition to block grants and other state grants, several federal agencies offer direct loan programs with limited ability to finance capital improvements. State loans, however, can be used to finance capital projects such as land acquisition for low-income housing. VIII-8 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT C. PUBLIC FACILITY ANALYSIS 1. Current Practices for Funding Capital Improvements Revenues have generally been used to meet mandatory or essential erating expenses in the past, with only limited amounts of monies available to d needed capital improvements. The City now utilizes improvements and projec entified in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to help guide fund allo on that will ensure the adequate provision of public facilities and infrastructure The various elements of this plan discuss and analyze c tal improvements necessary to correct existing deficiencies and provide fac' ' expansion to meet projected growth. The methods of project prioritization the identified capital improvements are explained below. To provide a means to determine the relative priority ach capital project, the City will use the following criteria to prioritize projects: • ~~Uhether the project is necessary to meet bushed levels of service. • ~Y~hether the project increases th efficiency of existing facilities or infrastructure. • Whether the project represent logical extension of facilities within the urban service area. • ~Y~hether the project is coo ated with major projects of other agencies. • \~~liether the project ' ements the policies of the Comprehensive Plan as they pertain to conc ncy requirements. • l~-'nether the proj eliminates a public hazard. • Whether the ect is financially feasible. Based on the crit noted above, capital projects identified in the various plan elements were and the estimated costs for each project were determined. Table VIII-2 display prioritized list of each capital project by element, including the conespon ' cost estimate for the period between 2001-2006. 2. Impacts~Future School Needs on Infrastructure The has included future school demands in the socio-economic data when an g the City's transportation needs. In addition, school demands on the City's w rand sewer infrastructure have been included in the level of sen~ice calculations those services. It is anticipated that there will be no major impacts of these acilities in the future, and the per capita level of service standards are adequate to anticipate future school demands. Timing and Location of Capital Projects Capital projects planned through 2006 will occur in various locations throughout the City. The timing of new infrastructure is accomplished by setting guidelines within ~~III-9 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT the various Elements of this Plan, to assess the relative strength of the C' s infrastructure to service both existing and future gro~vth. The numerous Elem of this Plan require City departments to provide an assessment of th ity's infrastructure annually at budget time. 4. Financial Assessment For purposes of assessing the City's financial capability to fund th pital projects identified in this Element, projected revenue sources and expen ' es through the year 2006 have been identified in Tables VIII-4 and VIII-8, resp vely. Specific local practices to help provide a more detailed le of analysis that will guide the provision of funding for needed improvements each public facility aze described below. a. Transportation The timing of new roads and streets, intersection ' provements, and the placing of traffic signalization have been driven by new d opment, availability of funds and public input. The location of signaling ces has been determined by the Department of Transportation on arterials is and on collector streets feeding into arterial streets. Placing of traffic signs a ther internal controls in residential and commercial areas has been determine the local traffic control authority of the Winter Springs Police Department e City's Public Works Department. Transportation projects, inclu ' provements that will increase efficiency or enhance existing facilities ar sted in Table VIII-2. Transportation related operations and projects are ently funded under the City Department of Public Works. This department is ded from general fund revenues and special revenue funds. The Seminole Co Local Option Gasoline Tax and State Motor Fuels Tax, which are a part of gen fund revenues, are resen~ed exclusively (pursuant to State Statute) for streets drainage operations and capital projects. A projection of revenues from the unty Gas Tax and State Motor Fuels Tax has been presented in Tab1eVIII-4. In 'tion, the City implemented a transportation impact fee in 1990 and amended ' 1991 to help provide funding for improvements to the City's To help d future transportation projects, the Seminole County one cent local option es tax was passed in 1990. This local option sales tax expired in yeaz 2001. On S ember 4, 2001, the County passed another voter referendum to continue the on ent local option sales tax to fund transportation projects through the year 2011. estimated that this tax will generate 12.5 million dollars for the City of Winter rings. A listing of the proposed projects to be funded by the one cent sales tax is provided in the Capital Improvements Program. Since a number of roadways within the City limits aze under the jurisdiction of Seminole County, a large amount of funding is expected from that source. Coordination with Seminole County and FDOT will be necessary to ensure the implementation of a majority of these improvements. The Intergovernmental Coordination Element recommends coordination with the County to ensure VIII-10 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT adequate funding of these projects. Funding for these projects is anticipated to c e from a variety of sources. An analysis of these sources is included later ' 's Element. b. Sewer Although the City's sanitary sewer facility capacity can meet pro' ed demand through the planning period, several projects aze planned to enha the provision of sanitary sewer sere-ices for future growth. These projects ' de rerouting of East force main, upgrades to lift stations, ~~~est Town Center gr ~ sewer extension and improvements related to the reuse system. The prioritiz rojects are listed in Table VIII-2. The major funding mechanism for sanitary sewer ca projects is the Utility Enterprise Fund. Other projects, which are related to provements in the existing system, are to be paid from renewal and replac nts funds. Sanitary sewer is funded and accounted for as a division of the City' nterprise Funds. A schedule of sanitary sewer projected user revenues, fees a expenses has been presented in Table VIII-4 & VIII-8. Effluent disposal is conducted by rapid in ation basins (RIBS) and spray irrigation. Connection to the City's reclaimed ovate stem is required for all new development located within the FDEP permitted r e service area. These connections will help to ensure adequate effluent dispos pacify for new development. Implementation of the reclaimed water program h allow the present ~~~astewater Treatment Plants to operate with increased effici *. The collection system for wastewater inside the City limits has been expande existing residences as funds have become available. Line extensions for new de opments have normally been the responsibility of the developer, with little or n onetary contribution by the City. c. ~yi~ater The City of `'inter rings currently owns, operates and maintains a central potable water distributio stem. The City's potable water system provides water for both residential and n-residential purposes, including fire-fighting demands. The City has historic been able to pro~~ide adequate potable water sen-ice to meet the demand ~ the City's boundaries. Presently, the City does not ser~rice surroun areas of unincorporated Seminole County. The central system is comp ~ d of three water treatment plants, seven public water wells, four above gro storage tanks, and several miles of distribution mains of varying sizes. The ea rn portion of the City is sen~iced by water treatment plant #1 (~UTP-1) while western portion is serviced by ~~'IP-2 and ~"I'P-3. The City's Master Utility lan depicts the details of the distribution system and future expansion, repairs and/or upgrades. The major funding mechanism for potable water capital projects is the Utility Enterprise Fund. A variety of funding sources are recommended to finance the various potable water capital projects. A schedule of potable water projected user revenues, fees and expenses has been presented in Table VIII-4 and VIII-8. VIII-11 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Numerous projects are listed in Table VIII-2 to enhance the Citp's potable systems for future growth. , d. ,solid Waste Solid waste is collected by a private hauler for disposal in Seminole Cotes landfills. The landfill site is owned and operated by Seminole County. Pursuant to Chapter 403, F.S., Seminole County is responsi for providing adequate solid waste disposal capacity throughout the planning on. The goals, objectives and policies of the Solid ~~/aste Sub-Element addres a need for the City to coordinate with Seminole County to ensure the County vidcs adequate solid waste disposal capacity for City residents and commerci stablishments. Revenue projections from solid waste collections are presented in le VIII-4. e. Drainage ~~'inter Springs lies in three primary drainage bas' .Soldiers Creek, Gee Creek and Howell Creek. A Storm ~~i'ater Master Plan was eloped and adopted by the City in 1992. This plan was created to be in co nce with St. Johns River Water IVianagement District guidelines and FD guidelines. The City implements a stormwater utility fee to pay for the ding of improvements to its current stormwater system and to provide for a stormwater treatment facilities. The City's drainage and storm~vate stems are operated under the Public ~Y~orks Department. Major funding for Division is from the Storm~vater Utility Fund. Table VIII-4 presents a sched of these revenue sources through the year 2006. The majority of these funds a been allocated for streets and drainage operating e.~penses. The Stormcvater D2aster n identified several improvements necessary to enhance the City's adopted leve service for drainage. These improvements were prioritized and are explained detail in the Drainage Sub-Element of the Infrastructure Element. Specific age projects are listed in Table VIII-2. It is recommended that future updates the City's Stormwater Master Plan continue to include a determination the amount of funding necessary to complete improvements identified in a plan and for the maintenance of existing systems. The has had land donated for various parks and some of the park facilities were do d by different Civic organizations and individuals. Some of the funding for c improvements for recreation that the City has used has been grants from the to and County. The City's Code of Ordinances currently requires parkland in neighborhoods. i~'hile no significant deficiencies were identified for parks, the City will complete several projects aimed at enhancing the City's parks and recreation infrastructure during the planning period. On September 4, 2001, the citizens of Winter Springs passed a 3.4 million dollaz general obligation bond for the purpose of acquiring 27 acres of land located on the west side of Central Winds Pazk. This land will be used VIII-12 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT to expand the Central ~~%lnds Park with the addition of baseball, football, soc , basketball, and parking facilities. The land is expected to be purchased in Ma of 2002 with construction expected to begin by July of 2002. A schedule these projects is listed in Table VIII-2. The City's parks and recreation budget is funded mostly from general d revenue and grants. Other recreation/open space needs may come from la reservations required by the City's Code of Ordinances. Forecasting of Revenues and Expenditures To determine the amount of funds available for capital prof s, both expenses and revenues were projected for the planning period. A r source of the City's general fund is derived from the City's ad valorem ta_~ e. Projected millage rates and future ad valorem revenues through 2006 are displ din Table VIII-3. Ad valorem revenue is generally used for gee existing trends, there are no funds available in Additional projected revenues for funds other for capital projects are pro~7ded in Table VI generated from the Seminole County local ti existing sales ta_v distribution formula, its aze presented in Tab1eVIII-4. eral nd purposes and based upon eneral fund for capital projects. n general revenue that can be used . Included in this table are revenues >n ~.Ol sales tax surtax. Based on the s expected revenues from the surtax Other financial considerations for c~Ltal improvements are pro~7ded for below: a. Debt Ca,.gacitT The City currently has nob ed general obligation debt. However, a referendum was passed by ~~~inter Sp ' voters in 2001 that will allow the City to incur 3.4 million dollars in gener ligation debt for an expansion of parks. The guaranteed portion of State reven acing monies has not been bonded. The first lien on City's excise taxes (utility taxes and franchise fees) has been pledged as the ce of revenue for debt service coverage. Florida Power Corporation o ates the City's electric utility through an Interlocal Agreement. Franchise fee -enue is pledged for debt senrice. Water utility revenue and the sewer utility re~> a have been pledged for debt service. Schedules of existing debt commi is are displayed in Table VIII-5. The um amount of total City debt will not exceed 15% of the City's property tax se assessed valuation, as reported yearly by the Seminole County Property raiser's office. Table VIII-6 displays the City's debt capacity based on the ~imum 15% ratio to the City's tax base. b. erating Ems, enses A schedule of the City's projected operating expenses extracted from funds that provide revenue for each of the City's capital facilities is provided in Table VIII-7. VIII-13 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT c. Summar;~ of PrcZjected Expenses and Revenues Expenses for debt capacity, operating expenses and project expenditure ere analyzed for each fund providing revenue for capital projects. A summary these projected expenses is provided in Table VIII-8. Based on analysis o e City's projected revenue sources and expenditures, ~~Uinter Springs has ade to funding for the capital projects identified in this plan. r~ summary of proje revenues is provided in Table VIII-3 and ~~III-4. D. CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT The intent of the Concurrency Management System is to ensure that pub ~ facilities and serc7ces needed to support development are available concurrent with the imp of such development. This section sets forth criteria for assessment of development impact guidelines to ensure that the adopted level of service standards established by the City's wth Management Policies required for roads, sanitary sewer, potable water, drainage, solid te, parks and recreation, and public school facilities are maintained. The concurrency ev 'on system shall measure the potential impact of any proposal for a development permit or er upon the established minimum acceptable levels of service for sanitary sever, solid waste, p ble water, parks and recreation, and transportation facilities, unless the development permi r order is exempt from the review requirements of this section. No development permit order which contains a specific plan of development, including densities and intensities of elopment, shall be issued unless adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposed elopment as determined by the concurrency evaluation set forth in this section. (Ord. ?007-22, 01 -?008) Table VIII-1: Inventory of Public Sch~(See Public School Fadlity Element Tables I~-1, IX-2, IX-3) (Ord. 2oo7-zz; oiaa-loos) VIII-14 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Table VIII- 2: City of Winter Springs Capital Improvements Schedule FY 2000/01-2005/06 i Projects Project Number FY 2001-2002 FY 2002-2003 FY 2003-2004 FY 2004- FY 2005-200G GENERALPUND I Iydcaulic Rescue Tool 03-2210-001 0 $25,000 0 _......_.. __ ~ _ __.__._._ _- 0 I'irc I;nbrine 124 04-2210-U01 0 ---_ ---- - 0 --- $280 0 ___.._ ---......_----- 0 -- Dump Truck -Public ~C/orks 04-4410-02 0 _ 0 ,000 -__ p y _ 0 Vehicles -Public Works 04-4410-03 0 p $22.000 0 $22'000 Air Cascade Compressor 03-2210-001 0 0 0 0 Rc-Surfacc'Croavood Basketball Ct. Parks &Rcc $15,000 0 0 0 0 Replacement Work Cart w/sprayer Parks &Rcc $22 0 0 0 0 Sand Pro Parks &Rcc ,000 0 0 0 0 CWP 2 Playground Resurfacing Parks &Rcc 0 $20,000 0 0 0 CWP'/Z Basketball Court Parks & 0 $15,000 0 0 0 CWP VfiD Drive for Irrigation P• •Rcc 0 $10,000 0 0 ~ 0 GO" Cut Deck Mower 'arks 8c Rec 0 $15,000 0 0 0 Replacement Parks Crew Cab Truck Parks ~~ Rcc 0 $30,000 0 0 0 Park/Vermin Brush Clipper Parks &Rcc 0 0 0 0 $25,000 2 - 52" Cut i\•fowers Parks & ltcc 0 0 0 $15,000 ._-.._- 0 Police Vehicle Replacements Police $104,000 $104,000 $104,000 $104,000 $104,000 General Fund Totals $154,000 $239,000 $481,000 $119,000 $151,000 GRANTS FUNDS 434I3cautiFication Lighting for tioe ells 02-4410-04 Parks &Rcc $138,000 $350,000 0 0 0 0 ....-_..-...-.__.------ 0 U 0 0 Torcaso P xpansion - 3.5 ac. Parks &Rcc $485,000 0 0 0 U VIII-15 CITY O(' WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Projects Project Number FY 2001-2002 FY 2002-2003 FY 2003-2004 FY 2004-2005 5-2006 Senior/Civic Ccntcr Improvements Parks &Rcc 0 $500,000 0 0 0 Neighborhood Center Parks &Rcc 0 0 0 $7 0 p CWP Esp:tnsion 8c Improvements Parks &Rcc $250+000 $200,000 $400,000 (1 p Total Grants $1,223,000 $700,000 $400, $700,000 $ p _ _____ BOND FUNDS ____ Park Land Acquisition Parks tic Rcc $2,950,000 0 0 _ 0__ _ 0 Central Winds Park Expansion and Improvement Parks &c Rcc $250,000 0 0 _ $2,500,000 Total Bonds $3,200,000 0 $ 0 $ 0 $2,500,000 POLICE IMPACT FEE FUND Police Ileadquarters Expansion Police $1G5,000 0 `_ 0 - 4 (1 - Police Totals $0 $1G5,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 FIRE IMPACT FEE FUND __.______ Station 3 02- -001 0 0 0 $1>~ Opp 0 Engine 3 _2210-002 0 0 0 $345,000 0 Fire als $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $1,345,000 0 MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION FUND _______ Rcscuc 3 02-2210-003 p 0 0 0 $19Q000 M Trans. Fund Totals $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 ,_.u . $_ 0 __. $190,000 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT F ND ____ _._ Signal Control and Lens Upgra 02-0140-OG $G0,000 0 0 - _ 0_- _ 0 --_ _ Winding I-Iollow/Parkst ignal 02-OL40-07 $40,000 0 0 0 0 S.R. 419/434 Sign gridcs 02-0140-08 $215,000 0 0 0 0 S.R. 434 Si ark/School 02-0140-09 $75,000 0 0 0 0 VIII-1(, CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Projects Project Numbec FY 2001-2002 FY 2002-2003 FY 2003-2004 FY 2004-2005 05-2006 Tuskawilla Road Signal Upgrades 02-0140-10 840,000 U U 0 0 'T'own Center Main Strcct 02-0140-1 l 8300.000 0 0 0 [~ishcr Road Improvements 02-0143-07 0 8600,000 U 0 U Bahama Road Paving 03-0140-02 0 8250,000 0 0 0 Winter Springs Blvd.'1'urnlancs 04-U14U-05 U 0 U 8250,000 U Transportation Impact Fee Fund Totals 873QOW 8850, 8 0 8250,000 8 0 LOCAL OPTION GAS TAX (TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT FUND Vehicle 00-0104-U4 0 22.000 U 822,000 0 Resurfacing/Underdrains 02-010=t-02 8125, 8150,000 8130,000 8150,000 8130,000 Public Works Compound 03-0106-01 850,000 $50,000 850,000 $50,000 George Street 02-0104-08 820,000 U 0 0 U L.O.G.T. Totals 8145,000 8222,000 $180,000 8222,000 8180,000 ONE CENT INFRASTRUCTURE SALES TAX (Seminole County Tra irculation Projects) Hickory Grove Blvd. 2-0143-08 0 8600,000 U 0 0 1\4ain titrcet 02-0143-09 0 8`)06,000 U 0 U tipine Road 03-0143-1U 0 U 8925,000 0 0 1-C ales Tax Totals 8 0 81,506,000 8925,000 8 0 8 0 STORMWATER UTILITY FUND __ ____ _ T L ittle Lake Iiowcll RCP Culvert OS-4413-02 0 0 0 830,000 ` 0 Undcrdrain installation 02/06-44"t3-08 820,000 820,000 820,000 820,000 820,000 Inlet/Outlet Lnprovem 02/OG-4413-09 820,000 820,000 820,000 820,000 82Q000 Little Lakc Ilowc .Culvert 03-4413-03 0 812G,W0 0 0 0 Gec Creek ' entation Pond 04-4413-U4 0 0 8122,000 0 U VIII-17 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Projects Project Number FY 2001-2002 FY 2002-2003 FY 2003-2004 FY 2004-2005 F 5-2006 Vehicles 03/05-4413-10 0 $25,000 U $25,000 - 0 No Name Crcck Drainage Sw:des 05-4413-05 0 0 U $9 0 No Name Crcck Swale and Culverts UG-4413-OG U 0 U 0 $92,000 Stormwater Utility Fund Totals $40,000 $191,000 $162,0 $193,000 $132,000 UTILITY RENEWAL AND REPLACEMENT FUND Roof Rcplaccmcnt - Wcst WRF 02-3600-93 $20,000 0 0 ---- 0 .- 0 Chlorination System Rcplaccmcnt 02-3600-94 $20,000 0 _ 0 0 tiewer Line Restoration/Pump Rcplaccmcnt 02-3600-102 $~~~ 0.~ $80,000 $SO,WO $80,OW Pump Replacement-Portble Water Facility 03-3600-103 0 $11,000 ;11,000 $11,000 $11,000 1-lydrant/Valve Replacement -Potable Water Facility 03-3600-104 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 Renewal And Replacement Fund Totals $120,000 $116,000 $116,000 $116,000 $ I 1 6,000 UTILITY 2000 CONSTRUCTION FUND _ West Trnvn Ccntcr Gravity Sewer Extension p2_ _ 9 $50,UW 0 0 0 0 Lift Station SE upgrade -3600-81 0 $50,000 0 0 U Well #4 at WTP #1 02-3600-12 $250,000 0 0 0 0 S.R. 434 Water 1\~Iain -Spine Road to S.R. 417 -12" 02-3600-68 $450,000 0 0 0 - 0 WTP #1 Water Main to Tuskawilla Road -1G"/12" 02-3600-73 $200,000 0 0 0 A 0 M:un Street Water Main 02-3600-77 $80,000 0 0 O 0 Force Main to'I'own Center Rc EWRF 02-3600-78 $700,000 U 0 U 0 West'1'own Center Lift Station ce Main 02-3600-80 $100,000 U 0 0 0 UtiGry C)perations FaciGt 03-3600-55 0 $1,000,000 0 0 0 Spine Road Water -12" 03-3600-G9 0 $120,000 U 0 U West Force pgrades to System 03-3600-84 0 $200,000 0 - `0 J 0 VIII-18 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Projects Project Number FY 2001-2002 FY 2002-2003 FY 2l}03-2004 FY 2004-2005 05-2006 East Force Main Rerouting/Upgrades 03-3600-85 U $300,000 0 0 0 Reclaimed Water Augmentation Pump Station 03-3600-83 0 $500,000 0 0 Utility 2000 Constntction Fund Total $1,830,000 $2,170,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 UTILITY 1997 CONSTRUCTION FUND Southern Water Main Intcrconncction 02-3600-09 $150,000 0 ~0 ~ 0 Utility 1997 Construction Fund Total $150,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 REVENUE GENERATION FUND Sewer Plant Improvcmrnts 02-3600-28 $120,000 0 0 0 0 Wesr WRIT Sludge Thickening 02-3600-89 $150, 0 0 0 0 Sand Filter at East WRf' 02-3600-100 00 0 0 0 0 Revenue Generation Fund Total $570,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 UTILITY ENTERPRISE FUND BLE WATER Chlorine Conversion WfP#3 ~ 3600-05 $20,000 0 0 0 0 I~icter Replacement & Upgrades 02/06-,3600-70 $100,000 $1OQ000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 CC Village Service Linc Replacement 02-3600-8G $28,000 0 0 0 ^ 0 Instrumentation & Electrical Upgrades 02-3600-87 $70,000 0 0 0 0 Polyphosphate Injection at WfP#2-3 02-3600-88 $18,000 0 0 0 0 Diesel Storage Tank Replacement 03-3600-96 0 $30,000 0 0 0 Electrical Upgrades 03-3000-97 U $50,000 0 0 _ ~ 0 Central Winds Park/P. ne Water Connection 04-3600-72 0 0 $511,(100 0 0 Electrical Upgra 04-3600-98 0 0 $50,000 0 _ 0 Addition. ps & Controls WTP# I OS-3600- l0 0 0 0 $125,000 0 VIII-19 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Projects Project Number FY 2001-2002 FY 2002-2003 FY 2003-2004 FY 2004-2005 5-2006 WTP#'1 Discharge Piping Imp. OG-3600-15 U 0 0 0 $150,000 Potable WatcrTotal $236,000 $180,000 $200,000 $~ 0 _ $250,000 SANITARY SEWER -_-~ - _.__.____...._.._ ~....-~__ SCAll~\ 01/04-3600-27 $90,000 $90,000 $90,0 0 0~ :leration Upgrade -Drum Thickener U2-3600-91 $65,000 0 -.__ l,.___.~_ U r\utomatic Bar Screen -E\~VRF 03-3600-2U 0 $100,000 0 ~ 0 __ 0 Scrubber for Gas CL2/Conversion GWRF 03-3600-21 0 $10 0 _ ~0 0 Dicscl Storage Tank Replacement 03-3600-24 0 0,000 0 _ 0 0 Scmbber for Gas CLZ/Conversion WWRI~ 04-3600-22 0 p $100,000 0 0 WWRF Sand Filter OG-3600-26 p 0 0 ;250,000 Sanitary Sewer Total $155,00(1 $320,000 ;190,000 _ ; 0 ~ $250,000 EQ ENT -----..__..___ Vehicles 02 600-G4 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 Other Equipment /08-3600-G5 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 Backhce/Front Loader 02-3600-G7 ;90,000 U U 0 U Eqt' entTotal ;215,000 $125,000 $125,000 $125,000 $125,000 Utility E se Fund Total $606,000 ;905,000 $1,015,000 ~ $350,000 $625,000 Source: City of Winter Springs and L,•~esign Innovations, Inc., apri12001. VIII-20 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Table VIII- 2: City of Winter Springs Capital Improvements Schedule FY 2007/2008 - 2011/2012 ' Projects Project ~ ~~/2008 FY 2008/2009 FY 2009/2010 FY 2010/2011 F 1 2012 Number UTILITY ENTERPRISE FUND RECLAIMED WATER SYSTEM Surface Water Augmentation 04-5400 $ 250,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 1,800,000 00,000 $ 1, 000,000 Reclaimed Water Total $ 250,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 1, 000,000 $ 1, 000,000 Source: City of Winter Springs, Public Works/Utility Dept., April 2W7 (Ord. 2007-11; 2007-07-23) Table VIII- 3: Projection of Ad Valorem Tax Revenues Year Projected Taxable Value (in thousands) Millage Rate rojected Revenue 2000 $972,981 3.54 $3,444,353 2001 -----__ $983,332__~___~._. X3,707,948 2002 $1,025,600 __ _._ - 3.7708 $3,867,332 2003 - "_-. ---_~ _$1,067,868 ~-- 3.7708 $4,026,717 2004 ---_----- ___-$1,110,137 ._.. . . ---....._..-. .----- ---- --. -- 3.7708 $4,186,105 2(105 . .. . . . _......- $1,15--- -- - 3.7708 $4,345,489 - 2006 4,673 ~ -_---~ - 3.7708 $4,504,873 Notes: Inclu entrally Assessed and Real Property and Tangible Personal Property. Does not include special assessments. Source:: ole County, City of Winter Springs and Laud Design Innovations, Inc. VIII-21 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Table VIII- 4: Projections of Non-Ad Valorem Tax Revenues ' Fund FY 2001-2002 FY 2002-2003 FY 2003-2004 FY 2004- 2005 005- 2006 Local Option Gas Tax (Transportation Improvement Fluid) $226,000 $233,342 $241,347 $249 $257,358 Transportation hnpact Fcc Fund (1.LF.I~ $468,500 $399,488 $392,335 $385,182 $378,029 Water & Sewer Utility Enterprise Fund (U.E.I~.) $6,353,556 $6,962,874 $7,4 4 $7,651,675 $7,881,275 Stormwater Utility Fund (S.U.I~.) $340,000 $361,542 70,943 $380,345 $389,747 Solid Waste /Recycling $1,540,000 $1,501,3 $1,511,348 $1,521,380 $1,531,412 Local Sales Tax $2,028,885 ~ $2 52 $2,335,748 $2,480,744 $2,625,739 Total Revenues $10,956,941 1,649,313 $12,273,795 $12,668,678 $13,063,560 Source: City of Winter Springs Table VIII- 5: Projections of Debt Service Obli ns for Outstanding Bond Issues Fund FY 2001- 2002 FY 2002-2003 FY 2003-2004 FY 2004- 2005 FY 2005- 2006 General Fund $1,023,010 $1,034,868 $1,042,560 $1,046,703 $1,054,145 Water c4c Sewer Debt Servic $1,976,521 $1,977,501 $1,976,114 $1,976,859 $1,979,171 Total Debt Service tty bonded debt) $2,999,531 $3,012,369 $3,018,674 $3,023,562 $3,033,31 G Source: City of Win Brings VIII-22 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Table VIII- G: Projection of Debt Capacity Year Projected Taxable Value Debt Capacity (`~ 2001 $983,332,000 $147,499,800 2002 $1,025,600,000 $153,840,000 2003 $1,0(,7,868,004 $160,180,200 2004 $1,110,137,0(x) $1 66,520,550 2005 $1,152,405,000 $172,860,750 2006 $1,194,673,000 $179,200,950 Soctree: City of Winter Springs and I.;tnd Design Innovations, Inc., Oct. 2001. Includes Cen Assessed and Real not include special assessments. Note: (1) Maximum debt will not exceed 15% of the City's property tax tease valuat' Table VIII- 7: Projections of Operating Costs Property and Tangible Personal Property. Does Fund FY 2001-02 FY FY 2003-04 FY 2004-OS FY 2005-OG Drainage $342,000 $359,100 $377,100 $395,900 $415,700 Water & Sewer $5,962,000 $6,260,000 $6,573,000 $6,901,600 $7,246,700 Transportation $5 $53,900 $56,600 $59,400 $62,400 Solid Waste 18,000 $1,278,900 $1,324,800 $1,410,000 $1,48Q500 Parks $1,334,700 $1,401,400 $1,471,500 $1,545,100 $"1,622,300 Totals $8,908,000 $9,353,300 $9,821,000 $10,312,000 $10,827,600 Source: Ci inter Springs, 2001. VIII-23 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Table VIII-8: Projected Total Expenditures by Fund Fund FY 2001-2002 FY 2002-2003 FY 2003-2004 FY 20042005 05-200E 'ransportation Improvement Fttad -Local Option Gas Tax Projects $145,000 $222,000 $180,000 $222 $180,000 Operating Expenses $51,300 $53,900 $56,600 ,400 $62,400 Total Fund Expenditures $196,300 $275,900 $236,600 $281,400 $242,400 ~ rransportatron impact rce ~ Projects $730,000 $850,000 $250,000 $0.00 Operating Expenses $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 'Coral Fund Expenditures $730,000 $850,000 $ 0 $250,000 ; 0 Water & Sewer Utility lnterprise rand Projects $606,000 05,000 ~ $(,015,000 $350,000 $625,000 Operating Expenses $5,962,000 $6,260,000 $6,573,000 $6,901,600 $7,246,700 Total Fund Expenditures $6,568 $7,165,000 ;7,588,000 $7,251,600 $7,871,700 Stormwater Utility Fund 1'cvjects $40,000 $191,000 $162,000 $193,000 $132,000 Operating Expenses $342,000 $359,100 $377,100 $395,900 ;415,700 'total Funcl Expenditures $382,000 $550,100 $539,100 $588,900 $547,700 Water & Sewer Utility R&R Projects $12Q000 $ l 16,000 $ l 16,000 $1 l 6,000 $116,000 Operating Expenses $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total Fund Expendi $120,000 $116,0(10 $116,000 $116,000 $116,000 Total All Ex lures $7,996,300 $8,957,000 $8,479,700 $8,487,900 $8,777,800 of Winter Springs. VIII-24 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Table VIII- 9: Facility Program -Public School Facilities: Summary of Policies, Programs and Capital Improvements with C Impacts Scheduled Program and Cost Impacts for 10/1/2006 - 9/30/2011 The Seminole County School Board Capital Improvement Plan includes signiEcant remodeling of existing structure ~ the building of new structures to expand student capacity over the next five years. Tota15 Year Cost: 5489,678,527 Potential Additonal Cost Impacts During/Beyond the F ear Planning Period Unknown impact of potential tax changes to be voted on in 2008 and whethe down in shident enrollment will continue, hold steady, or again start to rise. Available Funding Options- Iblajor revenue sources available a School Board are lbtillage, Sales Tax, Lnpact fees, Gasoline Tax Refund, COPS, Ran, Local Cap Improvement/Interest. Source: Seminole County School Board's rive 1'car ~o~d. zoos-2z; oi-is-2oos~ Plan,.\dopted September 11, 2007 for the fiscal year 2007-2008 through 2011-20(2. VIII-25 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENS[VE PLAN CAP[TAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Table VIII-10 School Capital Improvement Plan for Seminole County Facilities -ADDITIONS/REMODELING ' REMODELING & ADDITIONS 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 20 Greenwood Lakes Middle = = 8$ 00,000 $11,000.000 = Casselbertx = _ _ _ X1,000,000 _ Hamilton = _ = 000 $7.000,000 Idvlhvilde Admin = _ $500'000 1000 000 = Jackson Heights Round Bldg = = 50S 0.000 6 00 0 0 _ Lake Orients $10,166,G83 = _ fine Crest Addition/Remodeling = = 0 $10,Q00,000 = Seminole High $18.000.000 $5,000,000 _ _ _ Small Pr~ects $1395,000 700 0 0~7 0,000 0000 70$ 0,000 Suring_Lake = 00 $10.000,000 = _ Stenstrom = = 10~ , 00,000 x.000,000 = Wekiva = $1.000,OQ(1 $11,000.000 = - Wilson/Geneva Pods = = 80$_0,000 $6,000,000 Sales Tax Ptoaects _ _ _ _ _ Oviedo High $22,000.000 $5,000,000 = _ Red Bug = x,000.000 $7.000,000 = Sabal Point $~1 .,000,000 = _ _ _ Sterling Pack x.000.000 $11,000,000 = _ _ Source: Se e County School Board's dive Year Capital Improvement Plan, Adopted September 1'1, 2007 for the fiscal year 2007-2008 through 201 I-2012. (Ord. 2 ; O1-142008) VIII-2G CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Table VIII-11 School Capital Improvement REVENUE SOURCES / REVENUE 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-20 1 20 12 STATE Class Size Reduction $5,409,345 = = Peco New Constmction ~,929,59G $1,985,715 1 85 198 19$ , 85,715 Peco Maintenance $3,815,185 X2,050,000 $2.505,000 000 $2,050,000 CO&DS Bonds - = = = CO&DS $368,064 368 0 68 OG 36$ s,oGa 36$ 8,064 LOCAL 2 Mill $64.081,232 $67,238.758 12 3 083 $75,549,468 $80,082.436 Sales Tax $18,617,585 $14,070,410 ~9,270,G99 $9,548,820 $4,844,968 Impact Fees $3.500,000 3 50 $3.500,000 $3,500,000 $3.500,000 Gasoline Tax Refund 1$ 00,000 000 1$ 00,000 100 0 ~0~0 COPS = _ = _ RA - = = = - Local Cao Improvement/Interest 51,000,000 X1,000,000 $1.000,000 $1,000.000 Unde i~rnated 891 1 = = UB- $131.712,448 $90,312,947 $90,002,561 594,102,067 $93,931,183 Prior Ycar Carryover = X13358,021 $34.538,052 518378,797 X10.567.286 TOTAL $125 172,565 $103.670,968 5124.540.613 $112,480,864 $104,498,469 Source: Sc ~ ounty School Board's lAive Ycar Capital Improvement Plan, Adopted September 11, 2007 for the fiscal year 2007-2008 through 2011-zuta. (Ckd. 2007-2 - 4-2008) VIII-27 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREFIENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Table VIII-12 Planned NEW PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY CONSTRUCTION NEW CONSTRUCTION 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 11_2012 Land _ _ _ $¢.000,000 = New Midway Elementary 52.000,000 - = New Element~.ry School (Site TBDI _ - $1,000,000 515.000,,000 New Elemental School (Site 1 0 000 515 000 BD - - , , = New Middle School (Site TBDI _ _ = 52.000,000 533,000,000 New Higfi School (Site TBDI _ _ _ = 55.000,000 30 Modular Classrooms 53.180.000 _ _ _ - Rosenwald _ 1 515,000,000 = _ Adopted tieptember 11, ZWY for the scat year luui-touts mrougn tut t-tort. VIII-28 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES GOAL 1: Provide attainable fiscal means to ensure the timely and necessary installati and maintenance of public facilities needed to meet the demands of residents and siness establishments within the city limits of Winter Springs. Objective 1.1: Capital Improvement Schedule. To ensure that the necess acilities and infrastructure will be in place to meet Levels of Seraice (LOS) established within th omprehensive Plan, the City shall formally adopt the Capital Improvement Schedule, identifi erein as Table VIII-2. Policy 1.1.1: Capital projects shall be defined as those proj identified within the other elements of the Comprehensive Plan tare necessary to meet established LOS, increase the capacity r efficiency of existing infrastructure, replace failing infrastruc or enhance facilities and infrastructure that generally have a cos ceeding $50,000. (Ord. ?007-i l; 07 ?3-?007) Policy 1.1.2: Capital projects for the follofacilities and infrastructure shall be included and funded as part of City's Capital Improvement Schedule: • Transportation • Stormwater Ma ement (Drainage) • Sanitary Sew • Solid Wa • Yotab eater • P and Recreation Policy 1.1.3: Capit ojects shall be prioritized according to the following criteria: Whether the project is necessary to meet established LOS. • Whether the project increases the efficiency of existing facilities or infrastructure. • Whether the project represents a logical extension of facilities within the urban ser~*ice area. • Whether the project is coordinated with major projects of other agencies. • Whether the project implements the policies of the Comprehensive Plan as they pertain to concurrency requirements. • Whether the project eliminates a public hazard. VIII-29 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT • Whether the project is financially feasible. Policy 1.1.4: Capital projects for school capacity improvements included the Seminole County School Board's Five-Year Capital Improve t Plan adopted September 11, 2007 for the fiscal year 2007-2008 thr h 2011- 2012 are included herein by reference. (Ord. 2007-~?; o]-to-2oo8) Objective 1.2: Level of Service (LOS). The City shall utilize level of servt criteria defined in the various Elements of this Plan when determining the timing and funding of ital facilities. Policy 1.2.1: adopted LOS standards for facilities and inf~Eructure shall be as follows: ~ a. Tra ortation Facilities- The followin um LOS standazds for Transportation facilities based on avera aily trips are: (see Transportation Element, Policy 1.1.1) (Ord. 2005-11; 09-12-05) .2007-22; 0]-14-2008) • Limited Access Roads: asp ribed by FDOT. (ord. 2007-22; o]aa- 2008) • Arterials: LOS D • Collectors: LOS D b. ew - 100 gallons day per capita. c. Solid Waste- 7.1 unds per dap per capita. d. able ~~~a 15 gallons (m;n;rnum) per day per capita. (ord. 2007. I1; 07-23-200 ross Reference: See Ia&astructvre Element, Policy It'-B-1.1.) e. Parks- 5 es (total park acreage) per 1,000 population. £ as established by the Seminole County School Bo - 100% of the aggregate permanent Florida Inventory of S ool Houses (FISH capacity for each school type within each oncurrency Service Area, except for high schools which aze established at 110% of the aggregate permanent FISH capacity for 2008-2012 in order to financially achieve the desired LOS. (Cross Reference: See Public School Facilities Element, Policy IX-1.1.) (Ord. 2007-22; 01-14 2008) Policy 1.2.2: In coordination with other Citp departments, the Community Development Department shall evaluate land use amendments to determine the compatibility of those amendments with the adopted LOS standards and to ensure adequate funding is available when improvements are necessary pursuant to such land use amendments. 'cy 1.2.3: City capital projects shall use the following thresholds to target initiation and budgeting of construction and/or purchase of capital facilities to meet projected future needs based on adopted LOS standazds: VIII-30 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Roadways -Volumes are at 90 % of adopted LOS capacity. Sewer - 75 % of available capacity is being utilized. ~~later - 75 % of available capacity is being utilized. Recreation and Open Space -Park lands when 95 % of able land area is utilized or when 90 % of the population exists ~ eas in need of new park acreage. Objective 1.3: Funding Sources. The City shall pursue adeq construction of City capital projects identified in the Capital Improvement District retains the responsibility for financing and constructing school ?008) Policy 1.3.1: Policy 1.3.2: The following procedures shall be utilized transportation capital projects: ~ unding for the ule. The School (Ord. ?007-?~; Ot-14 adequate funding for The City shall continue to 'cipate in MetroPlan Orlando committees regarding transp lion funding to ensure funding distribution for transportatio roiects identified in Table VIII - 2. 100% of State revenue aring motor fuels tax funds shall be reserved specifically traffic related maintenance and capital improvement project 100% of net proc s, after payment of existing bond obligations, of the Seminole C tY Local Option Gasoline Tax shall be reserved specifically f affic related maintenance and capital improvement projects. 100% o e total proceeds from the Seminole County Local Option Sales shall be reserved for traffic related capital projects. F collected from the Transportation Impact Fee shall be r rued for transportation capital projects. following procedures shall be utilized to pursue adequate funding for :rnwater management (drainage) capital projects: 100% of the total proceeds from the Stormwater Utility Fund shall be reserved for storm~vater management operating needs and capital projects. Cash restricted due to bond and grant covenants will be budgeted in accordance with the terms of the covenants. 1.3.3: The following procedures shall be utilized to pursue adequate funding for sanitary sewer capital projects: Maintain a reserne account restricted for sanitary sewer related capital projects. VIII-31 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT .3 portion of funds collected from the Utility Enterprise Fund s be reserved to complete sanitary sewer capital projects. Cash restricted due to bond and grant covenants will be bu ted in accordance arith the terms of the covenants. Policy 1.3.4: The following procedures shall be utilized to pursue adequ funding for potable water capital projects: A portion of funds collected from the Utility E rprise Fund shall be reserved to complete potable water capital ects. Cash restricted due to bond and grant cov nts will be budgeted in accordance with the terms of the covens Policy 1.3.5: The following procedures shall be utilized pursue adequate funding for pazks and recreation capital projects: Grants shall be pursued and u for the completion of pazks and recreation capital projects. The Code of Ordinances s continue to contain provisions for all new developments to 'de parks and recreation lands and/or facilities and/or fees-' 'eu-of as specified in the Recreation and Open Space Elemen Objective 1.4: Capital Improvement aluation. All City capital projects shall be evaluated to determine if they meet the prio ~ tion criteria and consistency with adopted level of serv=ice standards and/or public need. Policy 1.4.1: Requests for ital projects shall be evaluated for their consistency with adopted le of ser~rice standards by utilizing the following criteria: 1 ajor capital project requests shall be submitted for prehensive plan review by the Local Planning Agency by March st of each year in order to be included in the following fiscal year capital budget. The Community Development Department shall prepare a report evaluating the timing, location, and service area for each proposed capital project and whether the project is consistent with the Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan. The City shall continue to maintain an inventory of any existing hazards within the City by using the hazards analysis and hazards mitigation criteria established arithin the Seminole County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan and shall also identify any grant sources available to mitigate the hazards listed on the hazard inventory. VIII-32 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Policy 1.4.3: Requests for capital projects shall be evaluated for their impact on e City budget and the financial feasibility of the project based o e following criteria: The Finance Department shall determine if the capital pr ct can be funded from existing cash, future revenues, or through rrowing. In addition, the Finance Department shall assign a reve a source(s) to fund the project. The Finance Department shall prepare a r rt evaluating the funding options, effect of the improvement future revenues, and the effect of the improvement on operation d maintenance costs. Policy 1.4.4: rlll capital projects shall be reviewed as to compatibility and timing in relation to capital projects being imple ted or planned by Seminole County, the Florida Department of Tr portation, the St. Johns River Water Management District, the Se ole County School Board, the Florida Department of Enviro al Protection, and/or any other government agency. The City s d use reasonable methods to track capital projects of any agency, ch may be in conflict or may enhance the City's capital projects. Policy 1.4.5: The City will update capital improvements schedule to maintain consistency with its W Supply l~TOrk Plan (Exhibit N-B-1). (Ord. 2007- 11;07-23-2007) Objective 1.5: Debt Management he City shall adopt policies and procedures which address the management and utilization o t for the purposes of capital project financing, and the City will use line of credit borrowing o and anticipation notes for specific construction projects and issue revenue pledged debt at c truction completion only if current funds do not provide adequate funding to pay for cons on. Policy 1.5.1: Th~ of revenue bonds as a debt instrument shall be evaluated based o e following criteria: A five (S) year projection of revenues from all funds shall be prepared and updated annually as a part of the City's budget process, and an analysis of historic and future trends in the revenue stream will be a part of the projection process. Revenue bonds shall be allowed to fund up to one hundred percent (100%) of the City's total debt. Debt will not be issued to finance normal repairs and maintenance. Debt can be issued to make renovations, updates, modernizations and rehabilitations provided the expenditures extend the useful life of the capital asset. The maximum ratio of total debt service (principal and interest) to total revenue shall be that % deemed most beneficial to the City as VIII-33 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT determined by the City's Financial Advisors and its Bond Cou base upon criteria set by the rating agencies and credit enhanc ent organizations. The impact of principal and interest revenue bond paym son the operation and maintenance of the affected utility and/ epartment will not require deferring current maintenanc of e_~sting infrastructure. The impact of bond covenants and restrictions the City's method of accounting for depreciation, and the impact any reserve account restrictions on the operation and mainten of the affected utility and/or department. Cash restricted due to bond and grant enants will be budgeted in accordance with the terms of the cov nts. On an annual basis, the City restrict the amount of cash equivalent to twenty-five perce (25%) of depreciation as reported on the prior year's annual fin al statement in enterprise operations to ensure adequate repair a or replacement of capital facilities. Capitalized repairs of a -' g infrastructure will be paid from funds restricted by debt cov ants and current revenues. Debt will not be issued to finance ca ed repairs. Policy 1.5.2: The use of tax reve s as a pledge for the repayment of debt shall be evaluated based o e following criteria: A five (5) r projection of revenues from all taxes shall be prepared and upd d annually as a part of the City's budget process, and an analys' f historic and future trends in the tax revenue stream will be a pa f the projection process. i e time of issuance of new debt, a review shall be conducted to sure that the marirrmum amount of general government debt shall not exceed fifreen percent (15%) of the City's property ta_~ base assessed valuation reported yearly by the Seminole County Property Appraiser's office. Policy 1.5.3• The City may use long term capital lease payments on lease purchases for capital projects identified within this Element, provided adequate debt service requirements are provided. Objective Repair and Replacement. All City departments shall prioritize capital projects t rovide for the repair and/or replacement of identified facilities. olicy 1.6.1: As part of the annual budget process, all City departments shall identify and prioritize capital facilities in need of refurbishment or replacement and submit those facilities for funding. VIII-3~ CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Objective 1.7: New Development. The City shall ensure that new developments proportionate share of the costs required to maintain adopted level of ser~rice standards, thrc assessment of impact fees or developer contributions, dedications, or construction of facilities necessary to serve ne~v development as required in other Elements of this Plan. ' Policy 1.7.1: All development order applications shall be evaluated as to a impact of the development on capital facilities and the operation maintenance of those facilities. The evaluation shall include, but no e limited to, the following: Expected capital costs, including the i required that are related to the developm~ Expected operation and maintenance facilities required by the developmen Anticipated revenues the impact fees, user fees, and fi of new facilities associated with the new will contribute, including Policy 1.7.2: When applicable, the City shall ~ e developer's agreements to ensure the timely and appropriate i ation of needed capital facilities to sercrice ne~v development. h agreements will be executed under the City's constitutional hom e power and following the procedures set forth in Chapter 163.3? Florida Statutes. Policy 1.7.3: To ensure adequat apacity allocations for all developments, the City may require any velopment to use developer's agreements and/or develop in mor an one phase. Policy 1.7.4: City shall c ~ tie to use impact fees for transportation and police and fire toe a new developments contribute their proportionate share of capital ject funding necessary to ser~rice ne~v development. Policy 1.7.5: N developments shall be responsible for installing all internal water sewer systems, traffic circulation systems, and internal creation/open space facilities within their development. In addition, connections of internal systems to the City's designated major water and sewer trunk systems and traffic circulation network shall be the financial responsibility of the developer. Objective 1.8: Concurtency Management. The City shall continue to operate a Concurrency anagement System for the review of all proposed developments within Winter Springs fo pact to public facilities a~thin the City and for impact to school capacity. As part of the City' oncurrency Management System, the City shall rely upon the School Board to deternvne and re rt to the City if school capacity is available. (ord. 3007-?~~ of-ta-zoos) concurrency evaluation system shall measure the potential impact of any proposal for a opment permit or order upon the established m;nirnum acceptable levels of service (LOS) for ~~III-3S CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT public schools, sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, potable water, parks and recreation, transportation facilities, unless the development permit or order is exempt from the r ew requirements of this section. No development permit ox order which contains a specific n of development, including densities and intensities. of development, shall be issued unless equate public facilities are available to serve the proposed development as determined by the currency evaluation set forth in this section. (ord. zoo?-z2; ot-t4-zoo8) Policy 1.8.1: Facilities Inventory and Reporting. The Commu Development Department shall maintain an inventory of the ble capacity of roads, potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, a arks and recreation public facility categories. Each year, the C unity Development Department shall prepare a report for the C' Commission containing the current capacity within each public fa ' category, including any encumbrances or deficiencies. This ann eport shall also identify any public facilities that will require improv nts to maintain adopted levels of service and recommend a sched of improvements to avoid any reduction in the approval of develo ent orders. Policy 1.8.2: Data on current water supply mand and permitted capacity shall be maintained lithe Utility artment and supplied to the Planning Division on an as-needed is for evaluation of proposed future land use map amendments. ( .2007-11; 07-23-2007) (Cross Reference: See Capital Improvement, Policy 1.8.3 uture Land Use Element, Policy 1.3.4.) Policy 1.8.3: No development o r shall be issued unless it can be detemuned that adequate waters lies and associated public facilities and services are available. (Ord. -11; 07-23-2.007) (Cross Reference: See Future Land Use Element Policy 1.3.4.) Policy 1.8.4: The City all withhold the approval of any site plan, final subdivision or functio equivalent which includes new residential units not exempted by 007 Interlocal Agreement for PuGlic School Facllit>~ Planning and School Co rrenc}~ As Amerrcled January 2008 until the School Board has reported there is school capacity available or a mitigation agreement has been eached. Cross Reference: See Public School Facility Element, Policy L1- 1.7.1) and Intergoverrunental Coordination Element, Policy 1?.8) (Ord. 2007-~?; 01-142008) ~~III-36 Exhibit `A' City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT October 2008 Prepared By: City of Winter Springs Community Development Department in conjunction with the Finance Department, Public Works Department and Parks and Recreation Department 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708-2799 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES TABLES Table VIII-1: City of Winter Springs Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements (SCI) FY 2008/09-2012/13 Table VIII-2: Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements (SCI) FY 2008/09 - 2012/13 by Fund Table VIII-3: Facility Program -Public School Facilities: Summary of Policies, Programs and Capital Improvements with Cost Impacts Table VIII-4: School Capital Improvement Plan for Seminole County Facilities -Remodeling & Additions Table VIII-5: School Capital Improvement Revenue Sources Table VIII-6: Planned New Public School Facility Construction VIII-i CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT INTRODUCTION The Capital Improvements Element (CIE) is the mechanism used to guide and implement the Comprehensive Plan through the programming of public facilities and services as identified in the other elements of the Comprehensive Plan and must demonstrate the fiscal feasibility of the Comprehensive Plan. The CIE is to be annually adopted and updated to reflect the timing and funding of capital projects to meet or maintain adopted Levels of Service (LOS) standards or implement the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The purpose of the CIE and the Schedule of Capital Improvements (SCI) is to ensure that necessary facilities and infrastructure will be in place to meet the LOS standards established within the Comprehensive Plan, by addressing them through the annual budgeting process. The SCI also acts as a monitoring system to ensure that programmed capital improvements are actually completed during the five-year planning period. The SCI includes those capital improvement projects for which the local government has fiscal responsibility, as well as some projects for which the Ciry does not have fiscal responsibility, including school facilities, certain transportation facilities, some water supply facilities, and privately funded projects necessary to ensure that adopted LOS standards are achieved and maintained. Capital improvements must be financially feasible based on sufficient revenues being currently available or available from committed funding sources for the first three years of the CIE. Financial feasibility for years 4 and 5 is to be demonstrated by ensuring that funds are committed or planned. Revenue sources that may be used to demonstrate financial feasibility include: tax revenues, bonds, state and federal funds, impact fees, service charges, and developer contributions. Expenditures or appropriations included in the City's annual operating and capital budget are to coincide with SCI as well as the City's capital improvements program. concurrency related facilities in the following areas are to be included: ^ Transportation Facilities ^ Sanitary Sewer ^ Potable Water ^ Solid Waste ^ Stormwater (drainage) ^ Parks and Recreation ^ Schools If the LOS Standards are not met, concurrency management requires a local government to deny applications for development orders and permits until the deficiency is addressed. In order to assure that facilities will be in place to maintain LOS standards in a timely manner and prevent a concurrency moratorium, the SCI must address deficiencies and be financially feasible. [Note: Land acquisition and design studies should be included, but do not satisfy concurrency- Only programmed construction phases satisfy concurrency.] VIII-1 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES GOAL 1: Provide public facilities and services which protect and promote the public health, safety and general welfare of Winter Springs' residents in a sustainable manner, while accommodating desired future growth and redevelopment at acceptable Levels of Service. Objective 1.1: Annual Review. The Ciry shall annually review and modify its Capital Improvements Element to ensure the financial feasibility and timely provision of capital facilities needed to maintain Level of Service (LOS) standards. Policy 1.1.1: A five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements (SCI) (Table VIII-1) shall identify capital projects needed to meet existing deficiencies, to accommodate desired future growth and to replace obsolete or worn-out facilities. The SCI shall identify funding sources and shall be reviewed and updated annually in order to maintain a continual five-year priority and outline of capital projects planned for implementation. Policy 1.1.2: The first year of the SCI will be included in the capital budget as part of the annual budgeting process, along with any other capital improvements that are identified in the City's Capital Improvements Program. Policy 1.1.3: Capital projects shall be defined as those projects identified within the other elements of the Comprehensive Plan that are necessary to meet established LOS, increase the capacity or efficiency of existing infrastructure, replace failing infrastructure or enhance facilities and infrastructure that generally have a cost exceeding $50,000. Policy 1.1.4: Capital projects for the following facilities and infrastructure shall be included and funded in the SCI: • Transportation • Stormwater Management (Drainage) • Sanitary Sewer • Solid Waste • Potable Water • Parks and Recreation Policy 1.1.5: The SCI will be updated to maintain consistency with the Water Supply Work Plan (Exhibit IV-B-1). Policy 1.1.6: An amendment to the comprehensive plan is required to update the SCI on an annual basis or to eliminate, defer, or delay the construction for VIII-2 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT any facility listed in the five -year SCI. The amendment shall require only a single adoption public hearing before the Ciry Commission. Policy 1.1.7: Corrections and modifications of costs and revenue sources in the SCI may be made by ordinance without an amendment. A copy of the ordinance shall be transmitted to the Florida Department of Community Affairs following adoption. Policy 1.1.8: If long term LOS deficiencies are projected, the Ciry must adopt either a long-term concurrency management system and a financially feasible long-term capital improvements schedule or other planning strategy to address these deficiencies. Policy 1.1.9: Capital projects for school capacity improvements included in the Seminole County School Board's Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan adopted September 9, 2008 for the fiscal year 2008-2009 through 2012- 2013 are included herein by reference. Objective 1.2: Level of Service (LOS). The City shall utilize Level of Service (LOS) criteria defined in the various elements of this Plan when determining the timing and funding of capital projects. The City must demonstrate that the LOS standards will be achieved and maintained by the end of the five-year planning period. A deficiency is a facility of service that does not meet (is operating below) the adopted Level of Service (LOS) standard. Policy 1.2.1: Adopted LOS standards for facilities and infrastructure shall be as follows: a. Transportation Facilities- The following minimum LOS standards for Transportation facilities based on average daily trips are: (cross reference: see 'T'ransportation Element, Policy 1.1.1) • Limited Access Roads: as prescribed by FDOT • Arterials: LOS D • Collectors: LOS D b. Sanitary Sewer- 100 gallons per person per day. (cross reference: see Infrastructure Element, Policy IV-A-1.1.) c. Solid Waste- 7.1 pounds per person per day. (cross reference: see Infrastructure Element, Policy TV-C-1.1.) d. Potable Water- 115 gallons (minimum) per person per day. (cross Keference: See Infrastructure Element, Policy IV-H-1.1.) e. Stormwater Management- (Cross Reference: See Infrastructure Element, Policy IV-ll-1.1.) a. Water Quantity -Peak post-development runoff rate shall not exceed peak pre-development runoff rate for the 25- VIII-3 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT year, 24-hour storm event. Each development shall accommodate its proportion of basin runoff rate above the downstream systems actual capacity. b. Water Quality - Stormwater treatment system which meets the requirements of the Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) and which is site-specific or serve sub-areas of the City. c. Roadway construction -All public roadways within a development shall be designed and constructed to standards which do not allow any amount of water above the roadway centerline during the following storm events for the following roadway types: i. Local Roadway - 25-year, 24-hour design storm event (5.0 inches of rainfall). ii. Collector Roadway - 25-year, 24-hour design storm event (8.6 inches of rainfall). iii. Arterial Roadway - 100-year, 24-hour design storm event (10.6 inches of rainfall). f. Parks- 5 acres (total park acreage) per 1,000 population. (cross Reference: See Recreation and Open Space Element, Policy 1.1.1) g. School Capacity as established by the Seminole County School Board- 100% of the aggregate permanent Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) capacity for each school type within each Concurrency Service Area, except for high schools which are established at 110% of the aggregate permanent FISH capacity for 2008-2012 in order to financially achieve the desired LOS. (cross Reference: See Public School Facilities Element, Policy IX-1.1.) Policy 1.2.2: In coordination with other City departments, the Community Development Department shall evaluate proposed land use amendments to determine the compatibility of those amendments with the adopted LOS standards and with available funding for implementing improvements that would be necessary pursuant to such land use amendments. Policy 1.2.3: City capital projects shall use the following thresholds to target initiation and budgeting of construction and/or purchase of capital facilities to meet projected future needs based on adopted LOS standards: Roadways -Volumes are at 90 % of adopted LOS capacity. Sewer - 75 % of available capacity is being utilized. VIII-4 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Water - 75 % of available capacity is being utilized. Stormwater -Adoption of TMDL Master Plan. Recreation and Open Space -Park lands when 95 % of available land area is utilized or when 90 % of the population exists in areas in need of new park acreage. Objective 1.3: Capital Improvement Evaluation. Capital projects shall be evaluated to determine if they meet the prioritization criteria and consistency with adopted Level of Service (LOS) standards and/or public need. Policy 1.3.1: The Community Development Department-Planning Division shall oversee the coordination of the Capital Improvements Element annual update. The annual update is a 10-month process and is required to ensure that necessary facilities and infrastructure to meet LOS standards are incorporated into the budgeting process. Policy 1.3.2: Capital Project Request Forms will be prepared by the Community Development Department-Planning Division and distributed to Ciry departments in February each year. Policy 1.3.3: Project requests shall be prepared with a description of how the project achieves or maintains LOS or how it will implement the Comprehensive Plan. Requests shall include a detailed cost analysis, including estimated costs for design, construction, land acquisition, and annual operating and maintenance costs. Policy 1.3.4: Project requests for capital projects shall be prioritized according to the following criteria: • Whether the project eliminates a public hazard; • Whether the project is necessary to meet established LOS; • Whether the project increases the efficiency of existing facilities or infrastructure; • Whether the project represents a logical extension of facilities within the urban service area to accommodate desired future growth; • Whether the project implements the policies of the Comprehensive Plan as they pertain to concurrency requirements; • Whether the project is financially feasible and its impact to the City's budget; • Whether the project is coordinated with major projects of other agencies; and • Whether the project is mandated by the State or Federal government, Policy 1.3.5: Project requests shall be evaluated by the Finance Department to determine each project's impact on the Ciry budget and the financial VIII-5 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT feasibility of the project. The Finance Department shall evaluate each project's funding options, the effect of the improvement on future revenues, and the effect of the improvement on operation and maintenance costs. Policy 1.3.6: The Community Development Department shall evaluate the timing, location, and service area for each project request and determine the project's consistency with the Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan. Policy 1.3.7: Key staff will participate in an internal Capital Improvements Element coordination workshop in March or soon thereafter, to discuss project requests and staffs findings. Policy 1.3.8: The resulting information shall be compiled into a draft Capital Improvements Program which shall be presented to the Local Planning Agency for review and recommendation prior to the Ciry Commission budget workshops. Objective 1.4: New Development to Bear a Proportionate Cost. New development shall bear a proportionate cost of public facility improvements in order to maintain adopted level of service (LOS) standards. Policy 1.4.1: All development order applications shall be evaluated as to the impact of the development on capital facilities and the operation and maintenance of those facilities. The evaluation shall include, but not be limited to, the following: Expected capital costs, including the installation of new facilities required that are related to the development. Expected operation and maintenance costs associated with the new facilities required by the development. Anticipated revenues the development will contribute, including impact fees, user fees, and future taxes. Policy 1.4.2: The timely installation of capital improvements required to meet LOS, which are to be funded by a developer, shall be guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement, interlocal agreement, or other enforceable agreement. Such agreements will be executed under the City's constitutional home rule power as authorized in Chapter 166, Florida Statutes. Policy 1.4.3: To ensure that LOS standards are maintained, the Ciry may require a development agreement and/or development to proceed in more than one phase. VIII-6 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Policy 1.4.4: The City shall continue to use impact fees to assess new development a pro rata share of the costs required to expand or acquire capital facilities or equipment made necessary by the new construction from which the fees were collected or for principal payments on debt instruments for these facilities and services. Policy 1.4.5: New developments shall be responsible for installing all internal potable and reclaimed water and sewer systems, vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems, and internal recreation/open space facilities within their development. In addition, connections of internal systems to the City's designated major potable and reclaimed water and sewer trunk systems and vehicular and pedestrian circulation network shall be the financial responsibility of the developer. In lieu of providing these systems, the developer may contribute funds quid pro quo for use by the City for funding expansion of similar systems. Objective 1.5: Funding Sources. The City shall pursue adequate funding of capital projects identified in the Schedule of Capital Improvements (SCI). The School District retains the responsibility for financing and constructing school facilities. Policy 1.5.1: The City shall demonstrate that the Capital Improvements Element is financially feasible by ensuring that sufficient revenues are currently available or will be available from committed funding sources for the first three years of the SCI (Table VIII-1). Financial feasibility for years four and five of the SCI shall be demonstrated by ensuring that funds are committed or planned. Committed revenue sources include: ad valorem taxes, approved bonds, secured grants, state and federal funds, tax revenue, impact fees, service charges and developer contributions (included within an enforceable development agreement). Policy 1.5.2: Planned revenue sources may include the City's intent to increase the level or amount of a revenue source, which is contingent on ratification by public referendum. However, if the referendum fails, the City will amend the Capital Improvements Element to either include policies which identify alternative funding sources or take other actions as needed to make the SCI financially feasibility while meeting concurrency. Policy 1.5.3: If projects are to be funded by funds generated from sources outside the City are relied upon to satisfy LOS standards then those funds shall be included as the revenue source within the SCI. Policy 1.5.4: For capital improvements that will be funded by developers, financial feasibility shall be demonstrated by being guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement or interlocal agreement or other enforceable agreement. The agreement shall be reflected in the SCI as the revenue VIII-7 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT source, if the capital improvement is necessary to serve the development within the 5-year period. Policy 1.5.5: Criteria in Selecting Sources to Finance Public Facilities: To the extent possible, the following sources (listed in order of priority and preference) are to be utilized to finance public facilities: • Grants or other intergovernmental sources • Developer contributions (inclusive of dedicated land and impact fees) • User revenues (inclusive of charges for services, local option gas tax, etc.) • Sales tax (local option infrastructure surtax) • Proceeds of Debt Instruments • Ad valorem property taxes Policy 1.5.6: The City shall continue to participate in MetroPlan Orlando to ensure funding distribution for transportation projects identified in the SCI. Policy 1.5.7: State revenue sharing motor fuels tax funds may be used for traffic related maintenance and capital improvement projects. Policy 1.5.8: Net proceeds, after payment of existing bond obligations, of the Seminole County Local Option Gasoline Tax (I.GT~ shall be reserved specifically for traffic related maintenance and capital improvement projects. Policy 1.5.9: Total proceeds from the Seminole County Local Option Sales Tax (1CT~ shall be reserved for transportation related capital projects. Policy 1.5.10: Funds collected from Impact Fees shall be reserved for growth related capital outlays. Proceeds from the Stormwater Utility Fund (SUF) shall be reserved for stormwater management operating needs and capital projects. The City shall maintain a reserve account restricted for sanitary sewer related capital projects. Policy 1.5.11: A portion of funds collected from the Utility Enterprise Fund (UEF) shall be reserved to complete sanitary sewer and potable water capital projects. Policy 1.5.12: The Code of Ordinances shall continue to contain provisions for all new developments to provide parks and recreation lands and/or facilities VIII-8 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT and/or fees-in-lieu-of as specified in the Recreation and Open Space Element. Objective 1.6: Debt Management. The City shall manage debt issuance and obligations according to sound public fiscal management principles so that the City is able to provide needed capital improvements and maintain services at adopted levels of service (LOS). Policy 1.6.1: Criteria for Managing Debt Financing: The City does not have legal debt limits or utilize specific debt ratios such as the limitation on the use of revenue bonds as a percent of total debt; the maximum ratio of total debt service to total revenue; and the maxiumum ratio of outstanding capital indebtedness to property tax base. Instead each debt issuance is evaluated on an individual basis giving consideration to the following factors: • type of facility being financed • significance of the annual debt service requirement • favorable impact to the City • economic capacity of the City • overlapping debt which depend on the same economic base • projected City growth rate. Policy 1.6.2: Debt will be managed with the goal of maintaining or enhancing the City's credit rating so as to lower total borrowing costs. Policy 1.6.3: Long-term debt will not be utilized to fund current and ongoing operations; Short-term debt may be issued to allow the City to meet its cash flow requirements or to provide increased flexibility in financing programs; Debt may be issued for renovations, updates, modernizations and rehabilitations provided the expenditures extend the useful life of the capital asset; Capital financed through the use of long-term debt shall be financed for a period not to exceed the expected useful life of the asset. Policy 1.6.4: The City will utilize external bond counsel for all debt issues and bonds issued by the City shall be competitively bid unless the City approves a negotiated sale. Policy 1.6.5: The use of revenue bonds as a debt instrument shall be further evaluated based on the following criteria: VIII-9 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT A five (5) year projection of committed and/or planned revenues related to the capital project being financed shall be prepared and updated annually as a part of the SCI update. On an annual basis, the City will restrict, for enterprise operations, the amount of cash as required by bond covenants for the purpose of ensuring adequate repair and/or replacement of capital facilities. Policy 1.6.6: The use of tax revenues as a pledge for the repayment of debt shall be further evaluated based on the following criteria: A five (5) year projection of committed and/or planned revenues related to the capital project being financed shall be prepared and updated annually as a part of the SCI update. The City may use long term capital lease payments on lease purchases for capital projects identified within this element, provided adequate debt service requirements are provided. Policy 1.6.7: The impact of principal and interest revenue bond payments on the operation and maintenance of the affected utility and/or department will not require deferring current maintenance of existing infrastructure. Policy 1.6.8: Cash restricted due to bond and grant covenants will be budgeted in accordance with the terms of the covenants. Policy 1.6.9: The City will competitively bid investment of escrow funds for advance refundings if it is expected that bids will result in a lower cost and the required securities are available in the market. Objective 1.7: concurrency Management. The City shall continue to operate a concurrency Management System for the review of all proposed developments within the City. As part of the City's concurrency Management System, the City will help facilitate school concurrency review by the School Board and shall rely upon the School Board to determine and report to the City if school capacity is available. The concurrency evaluation system shall measure the potential impact of any proposal for a development permit or order upon the established minimum acceptable levels of service (LOS) for public schools, sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, potable water, parks and recreation, and transportation facilities, unless the development permit or order is exempt from the review requirements of this section. No development permit or order which contains a specific plan of development, including densities and intensities of development, shall be issued unless adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposed development as determined by the concurrency evaluation set forth in this section. VIII-10 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Policy 1.7.1: Facilities Inventory and Reporting. An inventory of the available capacity of roads, potable water, and sanitary sewer facilities shall be maintained by the Public Works/Utility Department and supplied to the Planning Division on an as-needed basis for concurrency evaluation. Policy 1.7.2: An inventory of public parks and acreage shall be maintained within the City's Geographic Information Systems mapping software for purposes of evaluating concurrency. Policy 1.7.3: As part of the annual update to the Capital Improvements Element, the Community Development Department- Planning Division in conjunction with the Public Works/Utility Department and Parks and Recreation Department shall evaluate and report on current capacity within each public facility category, including any encumbrances or deficiencies. This annual report shall also identify any public facilities that will require improvements to maintain adopted LOS. Policy 1.7.4: Data on current water supply demand and permitted capacity shall be maintained by the Utility Department and supplied to the Planning Division on an as-needed basis for evaluation of proposed future land use map amendments. (Cross Reference: See Capital Improvement, Policy 1.8.3 and Future Land Use Element, Policy 1.3.4.) Policy 1.7.5: No development order shall be issued unless it can be determined that adequate water supplies and associated public facilities and services are available. However, public facility and service availability may be deemed sufficient if the public facilities and services for a development are phased, or the development is phased so that the public facilities and those related services which are deemed necessary by the City to operate the facilities necessitated by the development are available concurrent with the impacts of that development. (Cross Reference: See Future Land Use Element Policy 1.3.4.) Policy 1.7.6: The City shall withhold the approval of any site plan, final subdivision or functional equivalent which includes new residential units not exempted by the 2007 Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and School concurrency As Amended January 2008 until the School Board has reported that there is school capacity available or a mitigation agreement has been reached. Cross Reference: See Public School Facility Element, Policy IX- 1.7.1) and Intergovernmental Coordination Element, Policy 1.2.8) VIII-11 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSNE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Taple VIII-~: city of winter Springs Five-Year 5cneauie Ot capital improvements (5cq FY Zooaiuy-luTZns Project Name LOS Frmdlrrp Deacrip}lon / Justification Location Ra~Nq Year 1 Ywr 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 TOTALS CompnMmMe Pon Purpose Source sca. 2008109 2009110 2010111 2011112 2012113 (Years id) Rshrsrree LOS: PARKS 3 RECREATION Outdoor amphitheaUe furthers the network of pubNC green spaces that form the framework far the Town Center and promotes & expands trail ROS-1.1.1; ROS-1.4; Magnolia Park FUTURE CF-305 8 system; Improves recreatbnal opportunities Winter Springs 10 $ 1,290,950 $ 164 050 ~ ! $ $ f 1,155,000 ROS-1.5.2; FLUE-1.3.1; 1CTX consistent with the recreatbnal needs of residents; Town Center FLUE-2.1.5; FLUE- 2.2.3; Is a ataryst for private tlevebpment in the Town CIE-1.3.1 Center, Accemodates growth through additional aaeage for adive recreatbn [LOS]. Central Winds Park Pemwnent dog park expansion consistent with CWP Expansion Improvements FUTURE GRT 6 recreatbnal needs of residents; Utilizes grant Expansion near 8 $ ! $ $ 271,222 $ $ ' f ~t~ ROS-1.4; ROS-1.4.1; (~ Pant) pIMF funding; Accamodates growth throw additional SR 434 ROS-1.5.2; CIE-1.3.5 aaeage (or adive recreatbn [LOS]. _...:. Total ;; .a...:;:»>:. " '< ;:. S 1,290,950 f 164,050 f 271,222 f f t 1,728,222 <' LOS: POTABLE WATER Plant design for reuse augmentation projecb to IE IV.8.3.2; FLUE 1.3.1; Surface Water Treatmen FUTURE UCF augment and expand the use of reckaimed water Share of Lake 6 $ 207,000 $ ~' $ 'S f 207,000 HE 1.3.9; IE IV E.1 7; Plant Design for irrigation purposes, as a means ai reducing Jesup CE 1.2.6 demands of growth on the Floridan Aquifer. SR 46 Attemative Water Study of aflemative water suppy to reduce $ $ 175 000 $ $ f 250 000 IE IV.B.3; IE IV.B.3.2; Suppy FUTURE UEF demand on potable water frwn the Foridan City Wide 6 $ 75,000 , , FLUE 1.3.1 Aquifer. Electrical Improvements REPLCMT UEF M i i l l t WTP #2 6 $ 3W 000 ~ ~ • i ~ • ~ - S 300 OW CIE 1.6.1; IE IV.8.2; to WTP #2 ajw ma ntenance to e em. ectr ca sys , . , IE IV.B.2.1 NewVadableFrequency REPLCMT UEF Conirolupgrades. WTP#1 6 $' $ 75000 ~ ', $ $ S T5,000 CIE 1.6.1; IE IV.8.2; Controls WTP#1 :: . IEIV.8.2.1 Total i $ , 562000 S 75000 $ 175 000 S S S 632 000 LOS: SANITARY SEWER '''' HE139 IEIVA43 West Force Main FUTURE UEF Projed needed to meet future demarxl; Bolsters Lift Station 10 6 $ 210000 f • ; $ " $ S 210,000 FLUE 1.3.1; CIE 1.3.3; Rerouting I Design service to newgrowth; Improves effirdency. Discharge ; IE N.A.1.5; HE 1.19 HE 1.3.9; IE IVA.4.3; East Force Main FUTURE UEF Projed needed to meet future demand; Bolsters TuskavAla 6 $ 50,000 ~ $ 300,000 ~ $ : ! S 350,000 FLUE 1.3.1; CIE 1.3.3; Rerouting /Design service to new graMh; Improves efficiency. '' ;;; '; IE N.A.1.5; HE 1.19 HE 1.3.9; FLUE 1.3.1; WWRF Sand Fiber REPLACE UEF Projed needed to meet future demand; Increases yyWRF 6 ~. - $ s ' E 250,000 ;~ . f 250,000 CIE 1.3.3; IE IV.A1.5; rapacity for new growth; Improves efficiency. <>> HE 1.19 Total ` ` ;: - 210000 210000 < ::. " VIII-13 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSNE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Project Name LOS FundMg Description/JuetlBcatlon Locatlon a.nldrq Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S TOTALS ComprNwneNe Plan ~~ ~~ swn 2008109 2009110 2010!11 2011112 2012113 (Yeareld) Rehnna LOS: STORINWATER TMDL Water Quality FUTURE SUF Mandate ro meet State water quality regulations; City Wide 6 $ 55,000 $ 50 000 $ 75,000 .......................... _.... $ ............................. f $ 160 ~ ~ CIE 1.3.2; IE IV.D.1.1; Managemem Projects Improves surface water quality. , CE 1.3.2 Lombardy Canal Piping REPLACE SUF Major maintenance enabling efficient operation. Lombardy Road 6 $' $ 50,OOD " , ~ ~ $ $ ~ ~ ~ CIE 1.3.2; CIE 1.6.1; area ;.:; ;; <~ . FLUE 1.3.1; HE 1.1.9 Total $ 55,000 S 100 000 = 15 000 S - S S 230 000 LOS: TRANSPORTATION SR 434 & SR 419 Traffic EXISTING iCTX Addresses existing deficiency on SR 434 with SR 434 8 6 $ 165,ODD $ ~ ', ~ ~ $ 165,000 CIE 1.3.1; CIE 1.fi.1; Signallmprovements upgrededtreificsignals. SR 419 FLUE 1.3.1; Services future demand and addresses future Michael Blake BNd. deficiency of SR 434 by expanding interconnecting CIE 1.7; CIE 1.7.4; (Spine Road) FUTURE 1CTX colector road network in Town Center to reduce Town Center 4 $ 1,900,000 5 ;< ? ~ $ $ 1,900,000 FLUE 1.3.1; TE 1.2; demand on SR 434. TE 1.2.4; TE 1.3 Wade StreeU419 FUTURE 1CTX 8 Safety improvements; Furthers safe transportation t k t d f TE 1; TE 1.2; CIE 1.3.1; Improvements FDOT ne wor o ensure a equate movement o people SR 419 10 $ 575,000 ~ - $ ' § - ~ - $ 575,000 CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; and goods. D D i REPLCMT 1CTX Doran Drive (Blumberg to highschool)- R bi f h ll CIE 1.3.1; CIE 1.6.1; oran r ve e ur s es ol ector road so that existing LOS is Town Center 6 $ 200,000 $ ~0'~ maintained. FLUE 1.3.1; Ranchlands Paving REPLCMT 1CTX Dirt road paving provides suppoNng infrastructure Ranchlands 6 $ 700,000 $ 700 000 ~ $ ~ $ S 1,400,000 HE 1.1.9; CIE 1.3.1; to enhance existing housng stack. . FLUE 1.3.1 Residential Road REPLCMT 1CTX Rebuilds existing neighborhood streets so that Varbus 6 $ 125 000 $ 110 000 ~ $ 235,000 CIE 1.3.1; CIE 1.6.1; Reconstruction transportation network is maintained. , FLUE 1.3.1; North Moss Road REPLCMT 1CTX Major maintenance- Refurbishes collector road so th t i ti LOS i i i t d Moss Road 6 '; $ 1,300,W0 ~ $ $ 1,300,000 CIE 1.3.1; CIE 1.6.1; ex ng s ma n a s a ne . FLUE 1.3.1; H R d D l L FUTURE TIMF Addresses future deficiency of SR 434 by adding a d l SR 434 d ~ ' TE 1; TE 1.2; CIE 1.3.1; ayes oa ece ane ece eration lane to ensure adequate movement o Hayes Road 6 $ 125,000 ' $ 125'000 CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; people and goods. Vistavnta Drive Decel FUTURE TIMF Addresses future deficency of SR 434 by adding a d l l b d SR 434 & ' TE 1; TE 1.2; CIE 1.3.1; Lane n ane ro ensure a ece eret equate movement o Vistawila 6 $ 125,W0 ' $ 125'000 CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; people and goads. Services future demand and addresses future Orange Av to CIE 1.7; CIE 1.7.4, Orange Avenue Loop FUTURE TIMF deficient of SR 434 b ex ndi g Y Y pa ng intertonnectin Central Winds 6 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 FLUE 1.3.1; 7E 1.2; coNector road network in Town Center to reduce Park (SR 434) - demand on SR 434. Town Center TE 1.2.4; TE 1.3 Paves existing neighborood dirt street for use as Shore Rd to Bahama Road FUTURE TIMF a cdlactor road so that transportatbn nelwnnk is i t i d P id rti i f Hayes Rd in the 6 : $ 400,000 ' S 400+000 CIE 1.3.1; CIE t.6.1; ma rov n a ne . es suppo ng n rastructure (street paving) to enhance existing hausng stock. Ranchlands FLUE 1.3.1; ~~ Total ~ ; ` ~ `; ~ ~ ~ 9 3,915,000 ~ S 810,000 ~ S 1,3D0,000 ~ S 400,000 S 1,500,000 ~ S 7,925,000 ~ : VIII-14 CITY OF WI1~ITER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT LEGEND: Funding Sources: Funding Sources: 1CTX One Cent Sales Tax (Road Improvement Fund) -115 PIMF Park & Rec Impact Fee Fund CF-305 1999 Construction Capital Pro' ct Fund -305 R8R Utili Renewal 8 Replacement Fund FDOT Florida Dept of Transportation TLBD Assessment District Tuscawilla Li htin & Beautifictn GNF General Fund UCF Utility Construction Fund GRT Grants 8 CDBG UEF Utility Enterprise Fund Local lion Gas Tax Trans ortation Im rovement Fund VIII-15 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT ~ aole vm-t: rive-rear ~cneaule oT capjtai Improvements (5Gq FY 2008/09 - 2012113 by Fund Project Name LOS Funding Deacriptlon! JuetNication Location RaMckp Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 TOTALS C~Proheralve Pin ~~~ Sa,rce acme 20009 2009110 2010h 1 2011112 2012113 Refererfw 1CTX • ONE CENT SALES TAX (ROAD IMPROVEMENT FUND) • 115 SR 434 8 SR 419 Traffic Si l I EXISTING iCTX Addresses existing deficiency on SR 434 with SR 434 ~ 6 $ 165 000 Ix ~ $ ~ j! S 185000 CIE 1.3.1; CIE1.fi.1; gna mprovemens upgraded freffc signals. SR 419 , " . . ' FLUE 1.3.1; Services future demand and addresses future Michael 81ake BNd. FUTURE 1 CTX deficiency of SR 434 by expandirg interconnecting T C t 4 '''''"'''" ' >' ': CIE 1.7; CIE 1.7.4; FLUE (Spine Road) collector road rrelwork in Town Center to reduce awn en er $ 1,900,000 $ +~ ~ - $ ~ $ 1,900,000 1.3.1; TE 1.2; TE 1.2.4; demand an SR 434. TE 1.3 Wade StreeV419 1CTX & Safety improvements; Furthers safe transportation Improvements FUTURE FOOT network tc ensure adequate movement of people SR 419 10 S 215,000 ~ $ ~ ' ` , ' S 215,000 TE 1; TE 1.2; CIE 1.3.1; CIE 1 1; FLUE 1 6 3 1; and goods. . . . . Doran Drive (Bh~mberg to high sGroal} ' ' ' Doran Dave REPLCMT 1CTX Refurbishes cofactor road so that existing LOS is Tovm Center 6 $ 200,000 ' $ ZOO,OOp CIE 1.3.1; CIE 1.6.1; maintained. ' :.::.;'o';• ;:;;o FLUE 1.3.1; Ranchlands Pavin 9 REPLCMT 1CTX Dirt road paving provides supporting infresWCture Ranchlands 6 $ 700,000 $ 700000 ` ~ . $ ~ ' S 1 400 000 HE 1.1.9; CIE 1.3.1; to enhance exisOng housrg stock. . , , , RUE 1.3.1 Residential Road REPLCMT iCTX Rebuilds existing neighborhood streets so that Vadous 6 $ 125 000 $ 110000 ': S 235 000 CIE 1.3.1; CIE 1.6.1; ReconsUuctbn transportation network is maintained. , , FLUE 1.3.1; North Mass Road REPLCMT 1CTX Ma or maintenance- Refurbishes collector road so 1 Mass Road 6 $ 1 300 000 $ ,~ $ S 1 300 000 CIE 1.3.1; CIE 1.6.1; that existing LOS is maintained. , , , , FLUE 1.3.1; Outdoor amphitheatre furthers the network of ;:,: ,:, public green spaces that form the fremework for ,;: ;:: ::. the Town Center and promotes d expands trail ' > S..........._.. _; :;:: : ROS-1.1.1; ROS-1.4; Ma nofa Park 9 FUTURE CF-305 d system; Improves recreational opportunities Winter Spdngs 10 $ 300 000 S 164 050 ~ i $ $ , S ~0`~ ROS-1.5.2; FLUE-1.3.1; 1CTX consistent with the recrea0anal needs of residents; Town Center , . FLUE-2.1.5; FLUE- 2.2.3; Is a cefayst for private devebpmeM in the Town ;:: < :: > ::: CIE-1.3.1 Center; Accemodates growth through additonal acreage for acOve recreation ILOSj. ~ >. ,. TOTAL 1CTX EXPENSE ! $ 3855000 $ 974050 . 1300000 $ $ $ 8129050 T OTAL 1 CTX REYEN UE ` S 200000 414 14 S 1414 2 14 S 53 554 $ $ 1 8 36 982 :«::.>:::.>:::<:.>:<>»: :.>:'>.»»»»»» BND-BONDS TAL BND EXPENSE ,:,::; . ;;$ • S TOTAL 8ND REVENUE ' : CF-305 1999 CONSTRUCTION CAPITAL PROJECT FUND Outdoor amphitheatre furthers the network of ;;::::: <:. public green spaces that form Ore framework for ,:. ,:. the Town Center and promotes d expands trail ' ROS-1.1.1; ROS-1.4; Ma nofa Park 9 FUTURE CF~05 & system; Improves recreational opportunities Winter Spdrgs 10 $ 990'950 ~ " ~ ~ $ { ~ ~ '' S 990 950 ROS-1.5.2; FLUE-1.3.1; 1CTX consistent with the recreational needs of residents; Town Center . . ,.. ,, ,':; , FLUE-2.1.5; FLUE- 2.2.3; Is a catayst for private devebpmeM in the Town >: !,, ;;;;;;;;;; ,;;;;;; " ' CIE-1.3.1 Center; Accomodates growth through additional ;:.:;.:;.. :; acreage for active reaeabon (LOSj. <,:::. .. ... !a >. TOTAL CF•305 EXPENSE " 990 950 990 950 TOTAL CF•305 REVENUE S 990,950 S S S $ 990,950 :. VIII-16 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Project Name LOS Fun~rq DeacriptioN Juatlflcatlon LocaBon awrlr~ Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year S TOTALS Canprehemlw Plan ~~ Source acon 2008!09 2009!10 2010111 2011112 2012113 Rehrence FDOT -FLORIDA DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION Wade S1reeU419 iCTX 6 Safety improvements; Furthers sate transportation TE 1; TE 1.2; CIE 1.3.1; Improvements FUTURE FDOT ensure adequate movement of people d ~ SR 419 10 $ 360,000 ~ ~ ! $ $ ". S 380,000 CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; an goods. ;:, ,:.. TOTAL FDOT EXPENSE S 360000 S S S S S 360000 TOTAL FDOT REVENUE '' '' ........ ? . -.`.'' S 360,000 : S S S 380,000 l >: GRT -GRANTS 8 CDBG Central Winds Park Permanent dog park expansion consistent with CWP Expansion ImprovemeMS FUTURE GRT & recreational needs M residents; U6fzes grant Expanson near 8 $', $ $ 135,611 $ - $ ' ' S 135,811 ROS-1.4; ROS•1.4.1; (Dog Park) PIMF funding; Acwmodates growth through additional SR 434 ROS• 1.5.2 CIE• 1.3.5 acreage for active recreation [LOS]. :. ,. TOTAL GRT EXPENSE f - f f 135,811 { S S 135,811 T n T G l [: R T R F V F N I I F >^: ^i J>': i .. ............... ?: S M9 Mrl S 9M MII S 735 R11 S S S 937.877 3?: ~i~ PIMF -PARK & REC IMPACT FEE FU ND Central Winds Park Permanent dog park expansion consistent with CWP Expansion Improvements FUTURE GRT ~ recreational needs of residents; Utilizes grant Exparlsbn near 8 $ ~ ; S 135,611 ~, $ ' S 135,611 ROS•1.4; ROS-1.4.1; (Dog Park) pIMF funding; Accomodates growth through additional SR 434 '': ,; ROS-1.5.2; CIE-1.3.5 acreage for actve reaea6on [LOS]. : TOTAL PIMF EXPENSE S f f 135,811 f S S 135,671 T 0 T A L PIMF REVENUE :. $ 125,500 = 115,000 S 100,000 = 110,000 f 115,000 = 585,500 SUF - STORMWATER UTILITY (ENTERPRISE) FUND TMDL Water Quakty FUTURE SUF Mandate to meet State water quaity regulations; City Wide 6 3 55,000 $ 50,000 S 75,000 $ ~ `, ; : S 180,000.00 CIE 1.3.2; IE IV.D.1.1; Management Projects Improves surface water quality. CE 1.3.2 LombaMy Canal Piping REPLACE SUF Major maintenance enabling efficient operation. LombaMy Road 6 ~ $ ~ WO ~ ~ ~ ~ 6 ~ UW.00 CIE 1.3.2; CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1 3 1; HE 1 1 9 area . . . . Tnrei suo cY OONSC ^' >: <s.. ..:' sl s SSmn s ~mmn s Tsmn s S s ~3nnm :'':!i TIMF -TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE FUND Addresses future deficiency of SR 434 by adding a SR 434 & 125 000 TE 1; TE 1.2; CIE 1.3.1; Hayes Road Decel Lane FUTURE TIMF deceleration lane to ensure adequate movement Hayes Road 6 S 125,000 S , CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; people and goods. Yistavdlla Drive Decel Addresses future deflcierx;y of SR 434 by adding a SR 434 & 25 000 TE 1; TE 1.2; CIE 1.3.1; lane FUTURE TIMF deceleration lane to ensure adequate movement Vstawilla 6 5 125,000 S 1 , CIE 1.6.1; FLUE 1.3.1; people and goods. Services future demand and addresses future CIE 1.7; CIE 1.7.4; Orerge Avenue Loop FUTURE TIMF deficiency of SR 434 by expanding iMerconnectirg Town Center 6 $ 1,500,000 S 1,500,000 FLUE 1.3.1; TE 1.2; cdk:cta road network in Town Center to reduce ? TE 1.2.4; TE 1.3 demand on SR 434. Paves existing neghbortaod dirt street for use as _. Bahama Road FUTURE TIME a celecror road so that transportation network is Ranchlands 6 ` ! S 400,000 S 400 000 CIE 1.3.1; CIE 1.6.1; mainlairtad. Provides supporting iMrestrudure FLUE 1.3.t; (street paving) to enhance existng housng stock _ !>:. _ ;; .:: - ! ` ........ 250 000 400 000 1500 000 2150 000 TOTAL TIMF EXPENSE ` TOTAL TIMF REVENUE S 882,450 f 410,000 f 380,D00 5 390,000 S 400,000 { 2,222,450 VIII-I7 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT UCF -UTILITY CONSTRUCTION FUND Plant design for reuse augmentatbn project- to Surface Water Treatmen FUTURE UCF augment and expand the use of reclaimed water Shae of Lake 6 $ 207 000 $ $ IE IV.8.3.2; FLUE 1.3.1; ' Plant Design for inigatan purposes, as a means of reducing Jesup , ~ ~' ~ ; ~ $ 207,000 HE 1.3.9 IE IV.E.1.7; demands of growth on the Fbridan Aquifer. CE 1.2.8 TOTAL UCF EXPENSE ? S 207000 $ $ S S S 207000 TOTAL UCF REVENUE 4' S 421000 $ 2000 $ $ S S 423000 UEF -UTILITY ENTERPRISE FUND SR 46 Aftemative Water Study of akemative water supply to reduce Supply FUTURE UEF demaM on potable water from the Floridan City Wide 6 $ 75,000 $ $ 175,(100 $ $ >' • S 250,000 IE N.8.3; IE IV.B3.2; Aquifer. `^ FLUE 1.3.1 Electricel Improvements to WTP #2 REPLCMT UEF Mapr maintenance to electrical system. WTP #2 6 5 300,000 $ ~'? ~ $ $ ~ , S ~ U00 CIE 1.6.1; IE IV.8.2; IE IV.8.2.1 New Variable Frequency Controls WTP#1 REPLCMT UEF Control upgrades. WTP #1 6 $; $ 75,000 ~ ', $ $ ' S 75,000 CIE 1.6.1; IE IV.8.2; IE IV.B.2.1 West Force Main FUTURE UEF Proect needed to meet future demand; Bolsters Lifi Station 10 6 $ `' $ 210000 $ $ S 210 0 HE 1.3.9; IE IV.A.4.3; FL E Rerouting I Design service to new growth; Improves efficiency. Discharge , 00 1.3.1; CIE 1.3.3; U IE IV.A.1.5; HE 1.19 East Force Main FUTURE UEF P~ect needed to meet future demand; Bolsters Tuskawilla 8 $ 50 000 $ 300 000 HE 1.3.9; IE IV.A.4.3; Rerouting I Design service to new growth; Improves efficiency. , ~ ; $ , ~ $ $ 350,000 FLUE 1.3.1; CIE 1.3.3; IE IV.A.1.5; HE 1.19 WWRF Sand Filter REPLACE UEF Project needed to meet future demand; Increases WWRF 6 $! $ ~ ; s $ 250 000 $ ! ! i 250 OOD HE 1.3.9; FLUE 1.3.1; CIE 1 3 3 IE IV A 5 capacity for new growth; Improves efficiency. , ;: , . . ; . .1. ; _.. _.. . >: HE 1.19 TOTAL UEF EXPENSE ,', ; 425000 S Ze 000 S 475,000 $ 250 000 S $ 1435,000 '; TOTAL UEF REVENUE ; $ 8,072,150 S 8,750,000 S 8,775,000 S 6,800,000 S 8,825,000 S 43,222,150 LEGEND: Funding Sources: Funding Sources: 1 CTX One Cent Sales Tax (Road Improvement Fund) -115 PIMF Park 8 Rec Impact Fee Fund CF-305 1999 Construction Capital Pro ectFund - 305 R8R lJtili Renewal & Re lacement Fund FDOT Florida Dept of Transportation TLBD Assessment District uscavnlla Li htin 8 Beaullfictn GRT Grants & CDBG UCF UGIi Constmction Fund Local 0 lion Gas Tax Trans nation Im rovement Fund Ufili Ente rise VIII-18 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PL.~-1N C ~PIT~L IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Table VIII-5 School Capital Improvement Revenue Sources Revenue 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 20012-2013 State Class Size Reduction - - - - - Peco New Construction $1,473,990 $424,977 $624,691 $668,143 $267,882 Peco Maintenance $2,260,756 $3,049,660 $3,049,660 $3,029,957 $2,948,333 CO&DS Bonds $6,850,000 CO&DS $368,064 $368,064 $368,064 $368,064 $368,064 Local 2 Mill $65,321,653 $65,739,115 $70,102,761 $75,615,833 $81,879,555 2 Mil State Reduction ($8,165,207) ($8,217,389) ($8,762,845) ($9,451,979) ($10,234,944) COPS $21,000,000 Sales Tax $12,185,567 $7,953,238 $8,152,069 $4,126,356 Impact Fees $3,300,000 $3,300,000 $3,300,000 $3,300,000 $3,300,000 Gasoline Tax Refund $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 Interest $1,100,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Undesignated SUB-TOTAL $105,794,823 $73,717,665 $77,934,400 $78,756,374 $79,628,890 Prior Year Canyover $8,781,041 $3,738,712 $10,659,561 $7,645,383 $6,350,966 TOTAL $114,575,864 $77,456,377 $88,593,961 $86,401,757 $85,979,856 $OUrCl: Seminole County School Ek~ard's Fi~•e Ycar Capital Improvement Plan, Adopted September ), 20UA for the fiscal year 21HI8-21H19 through 2111 2-201 3. Table VIII-6 Planned New Public School Facility Construction New Construction 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 Land $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 New Midway Elementary $1,000,000 New Elementary "N" CSA E9 $1,000,000 Bus Compound Annex $3,000,000 30 Modular Classrooms Rosenwald $10,100,000 Source: Seminole County School Board's Five Year Capital Improvement Plan, Adopted September 9, 2008 for the fiscal year 2008-2009 through 2012-2013. VIII-20 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PL:~1N C.~1PTT~1L IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT Table VIII- 3: Facility Program -Public School Facilities: Summary of Policies, Programs and Capital Improvements with Cost Impacts Scheduled Program and Coat Impacts for 10/1/2008 - 9/30/2013 he Seminole County School Board Capital Improvement Plan includes significant remodeling of existing structures and the building of new structures to expand student capacity over the next five years. Total 5 Year Cost: 6412,226,62 Potential Additonal Cost Impacts During/Beyond the Five Year Planning Period COFTE Projections show a continued decline in student enrollment until 2010 with an inrease each year following. The 2005 peak ear is illustrated as not being regained until 2016. vailable Funding Options- Major revenue sources available to the School Board are Ad Valorem Taxes, State Revenue ources, Local Option Sales Tax, Impact Fees, Gasoline Tax Refund, COPS, and Interest. Sovice: Seminde County School Board's Five Year Capital Improvement Plan, Adopted September 9, 2008 Tor the fiscal year 200&2009 through 2012-2013. Table VIII-4 School Capital Improvement Plan for Seminole County Facilities - RemodeUno & Additions Remodeling 8r Addltiions 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 Casselberry Media $1,000,000 $5,000,000 Hamilton $1,000,000 $7,000,000 IdyllwildeAdmin $500,000 $1,000,000 Jackson Heights $1,000,000 $21,000,000 Lawton $700,000 $10,000,000 Lyman Bldgs. 7, 9, 10 $6,000,000 Milwee Remodeling $1,000,000 Pine Crest Addition/Remodeling $1,000,000 $8,000,000 Seminole High $13,500,000 Spring Lake $1,000,000 $8,000,000 Stenstrom $1,000,000 $7,000,000 Wekiva $1,000,000 $11,000,000 Wilson/Geneva Pods & Renovations $800,000 $4,000,000 Small Projects $700,000 $700,000 $700,000 $700,000 $700,000 Excel Relocation/Remodel $1,900,000 Sales Tax Projects Oviedo High $14,400,000 Red Bug $1,000,000 $8,000,000 Sterling Park $11,000,000 Misc. Contingency $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 Source: Seminole County School Board's Five Year Capital Improvement Plan, Adopted September 9, 2008 for the fiscal year 200&2009 through 2012-2013. VIII-19 Exhibit `B' Transportation Element Objective 1.1 Level of Setvice. Throughout the planning period, the City shall enforce the Level of Service OS standard on all arterial and collector roads. Policy 1.1.1 The minimum daily T,..-__' ~r ~_~~__ 't,OS} standard, to be adopted as part of this element and plan, Shall be aS follows (Cross Reference: See Capital Improvement Element, Policy 1.2.1- a.): • Limited Access Roads as prescribed by FDOT • Arterials D • Collectors D The LOS standards are based on ADT (average daily trips). The City shall coordinate with the MPO and LYNX to assist the County in maintaining the County's adopted'---' ,.r ~~~~-~LOS standard for mass transit -1.03 revenue miles per capita per year based on the estimated functional population within the transit service area. (Ord. 2005-11; 09-12-05) Policy 1.2.7 Land development regulations shall contain specific access management alternative techniques to control access and preserve'~--~' ~` ~~~~-~LOS. These techniques include but are not limited to the following: • Limit access to roads by controlling the number and location of site access driveways; (Ord. 2005-11; 09-12-05) • Cross-access elements of adjacent properties where feasible; and • Use of frontage or back-lot parallel access roads where feasible. Policy 1.5.12 The City shall require that sidewalks be constructed concurrently with new development, by the developer. Additional sidewalks will be constructed in existing developed areas when requested 6ETdt3eY3. (Cross Reference: See Capital Improvements Klement, Policy 1.4.5) Policy 1.6.3 The City shall ensure that all roads serviced by public transit routes function at a'~--~' ~` ~-~-~--~LO~ sufficient to support the bus service. Policy 1.9.1 The City shall keep appraised of the schedules for improvements and ongoing policies of all jurisdictions whose transportation responsibilities within the City limits affect the quality of life and the'---' ~~ ~~~-~--~LOS on which Winter Springs citizens depend. Policy 1.9.6 The Ciry shall continue to monitor the construction schedules of Department of Transportation regarding improvement of SR 434 through the City so that the level-s€ ser~ieeLOS is not degraded below the state's criteria for a principal arterial link. In applying the lenience to permit three years in advance of funded improvements, be selective so that development permitted to proceed prior to actual construction of the higher capacity road will include only those projects which further progress toward other goals. Policy 1.11.1 The Ciry shall continue requiring that adequate transportation facilities to maintain the Ciry's'~--~' ~~ ~~~-~-~LOS standards be available to meet the traffic demands of all new development prior to the issuance of a final development order, in accordance with the Concurrency Management Provisions set forth in the Capital Improvements Element of this Plan. Policy 1.11.2 The City shall require that all new developments anticipated to generate 300 or more daily trips be required to submit a Transportation Impact Study. (Oxd. 2005-11; 09-12-05) (See TE policy 1.1.3) Exhibit `C' Infrastructure Element- Sanitarv Sewer Subelement Objective IV-A-1: Existing Wastewater Treatment. The City shall correct existing deficiencies; ensure that the minimum Level of Service LO for sanitary sewer is met; and, provide a level of treatment that meets the water quality standards for effluent limitations established by the FDEP. Policy IV-A-1.1: The City's adopted level of service for sanitary sewer treatment shall be 100 gallons per rs n-eB~iEs per day. (Cross Reference: See Capital Improvements Element Policy 1.2.1-b.) Policy IV-A-1.4: The City shall implement the Schedule of Capital Improvements~SCII to correct existing deficiencies and update the se}3ec~t~le S I annually during the City's annual budget process. (Cross Reference: See Capital Improvements Element Policy 1.1.1.) Policy IV-A-1.5: All improvements and/or additions to sanitary sewer facilities shall be compatible and adequate to meet the adopted'--~' ~` ~~°-'-~ ILOS~ standards. Policy IV-A-1.6: All land use amendments shall require an analysis of the impact of such amendment on the adopted '~--~' ~` ~~---~--~ ~LOSI standard and existing sanitary sewer facilities. Policy IV-A-2.3: The City shall implement the S~ CI~,to prepare for future development and updates it annually during the City's annual budget process. Potable Watet Subelement Policy IV-B-1.1: The City's '~--~' ~` ~~-~-~ LQS for potable water supply shall be a minimum of 115 gallons per person per day. (Cross Reference: Capital Improvement Element, Policy 1.2.1-d.) Policy IV-B-2.5: All improvements and/or additions to potable water facilities to correct deficiencies shall be adequate to meet the adopted '~--~' ~` ~~°-'-~ LOS standards based upon data and analysis in the City's Water Ssrpply Plan 2007, and the SJRWMD's Dirtrrct Water Supply Plan 2005. Policy IV-B-3.1: Based upon the adopted'~--~' ~r ~~~~~~ LOS and data and analysis in the City's Water Supply Plan 2007, the City will review future demands to verify that there are no needs for future expansion of potable water facilities. Policy IV-B-3.3: If new development would result in a significant increase in population beyond current projections, the City shall reevaluate the potable water system capacity and ensure that the central water system can meet '~--~' ~`' ~~~~--~ L~ standards prior to issuance of a development order. Policy IV-B-4.2: The City shall implement the five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements Sekec~le S( CI~for potable water facilities adopted in the Capital Improvements Element. Policy IV-B-4.3: The City will review the Schedule of Capital Improvements ~,(SCI~ annually and adopt a City budget that prioritizes needed potable water improvements to meet the demands of future growth and approved developments. (Cross Reference: See Capital Improvements Element Policy 1.1.1.) Objective IV-B-7: When reviewing applications for development orders within the City limits, the City shall consider impact on the environment, including the ability to be served by the City's existing water facilities. The City shall maintain initiatives to conserve potable water resources, which ensure that existing Level of Service (LOS), standards for potable water, do not increase more than twenty (20) gallons per person per day. Policy IV-B-7.4: The City shall implement the five-year SCI for reclaimed water facilities adopted in the Capital Improvements Element, as well as the annual Capital Improvement Plan. Solid i~aste Subelement Policy IV-C-1.1: The City's minimum t,.__.., ~c,...-._:.... LOS for municipal solid waste shall be 7.1 pounds per person per day, which will be utilized to plan for future demand. (Cross Reference: See Capital Improvements Element Polity 1.2.1-c.) Policy IV-C-2.1: The City will provide adequate equipment to maintain a '°-•°' ~~ ~~-~~- LOS standard for solid waste collection of 7.1 pounds per ersonea}~ita per day. Drainage Subelement Objective IV-D-1: Flood Control. The City shall achieve and maintain the following adopted stormwater management Level of Service (LOS) standards that shall meet or exceed state and federal regulations for stormwater quality and quantity. Policy IV-D-1.1: New development and redevelopment issued a development order after June 30, 1991, shall meet the following water quality and quantity ie~el-e€ ~I.OS~ standards (Cross Reference: See Capital Improvements Element Policy 1.2.1-e.): ***+* • Roadway construction -All public roadways within a development, and required as part of the development order, shall be designed and constructed to standards which do not allow any amount of water above the roadway centerline during the following storm events for the following roadway types: ***** Policy IV-D-2.8: The City shall utilize the Stormwater Master Plan for preparation of the five (5) year SCI to correct existing deficiencies and prepare for future stormwater demands. Policy IV-D-4.1: The City shall review detailed calculations for new projects prepared by a registered professional engineer which show that retention and detention will be accomplished to meet the adopted'~--~' ~` ~~---'-~ (LOST, and that there will be no negative impacts to downstream water quality or quantity. Objective IV-D-5: Intetgovetnmental Coordination The City of Winter Springs shall educate citizens and coordinate with applicable jurisdictions to address Stormwater issues of mutual concern and to provide adequate Levels of Service (LOST . Exhibit `D' Recreation and Omen Space Element Objective 1.1: Level ofSetvice fLOS1 Standatds fot Packs. To ensure adequate lands are provided for parks, the city shall utilize Level of Service (LOS), standards for parks and other criteria specific to population, park size and location. For purposes of implementing this Objective, the City may utilize parklands under the jurisdiction of Seminole County and parks provided within residential developments. Policy 1.1.1: The T,____, _r ~_~____ 't,OSj standard for parks shall be as follows (Cross Reference: See Capital Improvements Element Policy 1.2.1-£): • Overall Parkland: Five (S) acres per 1,000 residents. This standard includes both passive and active City parks and recreational facilities, and includes Community, Neighborhood, and Mini parks. • Community and Neighborhood Parks: Five (5) acres per 1,000 residents. This standard applies to community and neighborhood park acreage combined. Objective 1.3: LOS Updates. The City shall review and, if necessary, update the Parks Level of Service ,(LOST standards every five years. Policy 1.3.1: The City Parks and Recreation Department shall provide a written report every five (5) years justifying or proposing amendments to the'~--~' ~` ~~--~-~ (LOSS standards for parks and recreation facilities. Policy 1.3.2: At the time the first written report is prepared, the City shall consider the need to adopt detailed '~--~' ~` --°-~~~ (LOSl standards for specific activity-based recreational facilities (fields and courts). Objective 1.6: Ptivate Packs and Recreation Facilities. The Ciry shall coordinate the provision of open space by both public and private interests to achieve adopted Level of Service (LOSS. standards. Policy 1.7.2: The City shall utilize the'~--~' ~` ~--~--- LOS review to recommend recreation improvements located within private development.