HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990 12 10 Regular
! :./ ~y ;r}
e
December 5, 1990
FROM:
City Manager
Land Development coordinato~
TO:
RE:
Agenda Item, P & Z Board Recommendation
The above referenced concerns the Shepard Road Extension which
Florida Land Company has requested to delete from the Highlands PUD
Preliminary Development Plan (Master Plan).
e
The P & Z Board found this inconsistent with the plan and forwarded
it to the City Commission for action. Section 20-358(b) of the Code
requires that the Commission hold a Public Hearing on the matter.
This is the purpose of the meeting on this date.
A public hearing may be held on January 14, 1991 if the Commission
is in agreement on this date.
Attached is the package submitted to the P & Z Board.
ffg
attach.
cc: Mayor
Commission
City Attorney
City Clerk
.
/-
,1"..-......
e
October 30. 1990
TO:
FROM:
P & Z Board
Land Development coordinato~
RE:
Request of Florida Land Company for Alteration to the
Preliminary Development Plan of the Highlands PUD
as per Section 20-358 of the Code
e
The above referenced is to delete that portion of Shepard Road
extending from the present terminus (as shown in red on the
attached aerial map) to some junction on Edgemon Avenue.
Florida Land Company's project is highlighted in yellow on the
aerial.
The Shepard Road Connection was approved by the City Council on
August 29. 1977 and the connection is to be made as development
occurs.
Please see attached Staff comments on this request.
The P & Z Board will hear this request at 7:30 p.m. on
November 7. 1990.
ffg
attach.
cc: City Manager
.
e
October 4, 1990
TO:
Land
FROM:
City Engineer
SUBJECT:
Shepard Road Extension
As per your request, in a meeting held on October 2, 1990,
the following comments are made regarding the Shepard Road Extension.
e
From an engineering standpoint, the Engineering Department
is concerned with the engineering conformance to the City Code and
standard engineering practices. The Engineering Department takes a
neutral position as to whether the road should be constructed or not.
Please note that the engineering drawings with paving and
drainage, sanitary sewer and water distribution, was submitted to the
City for approval on September 11, 1973. Briskey Engineering Company
was the Engineering Consultant for the project.
ffg
e
e
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708
Telephone (407) 327-1800
TO: Land Development Coordinator
FROM: G. E. Artman&~
DATE: October 4. 1990
SUBJECT: Shepherd Road Extension
*********************************************************************
The extension of Shepherd Road to Edgemon or lack of extension would
have no adverse effect on Public Works activities now or in the future.
e
e
FIRE DEPARTMENT
102 NORTH MOSS ROAD
WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708
TELEPHONE (407) 327-2332
FIRE AND
RESCUE
SERVICES
October 4, 1990
TO: Don LeBlanc,
Land Development Coordinator
FROM: Fire Chief~
SUBJECT: Deletion of Shepard Road - Highlands PUD
e
The following is offered in defense of Shepard Road being left on the
Plan for development of the Highlands PUD.
I personally measured certain distances of travel between significant
points in the Highlands from Fire Station One or. Moss Road. There is a signif-
icant difference in distances of up to a full mile between points depending on
whether or not Shepard Road is allowed to go through. Examples of differences
are as follows:
FROM TO VIA DISTANCE
Fire Sta. One Intersection of Sheoah Blvd. SR 434/Sheoah Blvd. 1.9 Miles
and Shepard Road
Fire Sta. One Intersection of Sheoah Blvd. 419/Shepard Road 1.6 Miles
and Shepard Road Extension
Fire Sta. One Proposed New Project SR 434/Sheoah Blvd. 1.4 Miles
MacGregor Road
Fire Sta. One Proposed New Project 419/Shepard Road .8 Mil e
Fire Sta. One End of Existing Shepard Rd. 434/Sheoah Blvd. 2.5 Mil es
Fire Sta. One End of Existing Shepard Rd. 419/Shepard Road 1.0 Mile
Extension
e
North End of End of Existing Shepard Rd. Sheoah Blvd. 2.0 Miles
MacGregor
North End of End of Existing Shepard Rd. Proposed New Project .1 Mile
MacGregor
In addition to the above, the fire department response area includes Wild-
wood and other locations in that vicinity which includes the intersection of
Shepard Road and US Highways 17 and 92. Travel distances range from 2.7 miles
via SR 434 and US 17 and 92 to 2.4 miles via Sheoah Boulevard as opposed to 2.1
miles by way of the proposed Shepard Road route.
e
e
e
Land Development Coordinator
Deletion of Shepard Road - Highlands PUD
Page Two
While the differences in distances may not seem to be great it must be
considered that heavy equipment, i.e., fire trucks and rescue units will be
making these trips and do not travel as fast nor are as maneuverable as a
sedan or other lighter and smaller vehicles. The measurable distances are
extremely valuable for two reasons: Travel time and alternate routes.
Presently there is only one route for emergency vehicles to reach the
interior of the Highlands. The response time to the far reaches of the
Highlands PUD is as much as seven (7) minutes while the average response time
city wide is three and one half (3.5) minutes.
To permanently delete Shepard Road from the Highlands PUD is detrimental
to the safety and well being of the current and future citizens of that commun-
ity. Such deletion will create another IIdeep pocketll in the city that isolates
citizens from each other and creates delays in responding to emergency situations.
As the Chief of a department which is responsible to provide fire suppress-
ion and emergency medical services to citizens, the deletion of Shepard Road from
the Highlands PUD is considered to jeopardize those citizens.
CLH/pjs
e
e
e
October 30, 1990
TO: Planning and Zoning Board
SUBJECT: Shepard Road in the Highlands
Shepard Road is an important link in the limited collector road system of the
western area of Winter Springs. As one of ~ collector roads planned to
support a 641-acre developnent, it functions to carry traffic from the local
streets in the Highlands to and from arterial highways that form a triangle
around the PUD and allow easy access for residents to travel in all four
directions of the metropolitan area. It is a well-conceived design.
Winter Springs needs to complete all planned collector roads and construct
additional ones to ensure adequate traffic circulation for its citizens in the
future. To eliminate one would be a self-defeating action.
If Shepard Road were not completed through to Edgemon Avenue as a full-fledged
collector road with no residential driveways, this would repeat the mistakes
made south of S.R. 434 where three collector roads deadend short of any direct
connection to other collector or arterial roads to the south. The City plans
to correct this situation by completing two or more paved connections down to
Seminola Boulevard and Lake Drive so that those residents may have a convenient
alternative to always using S.R. 434. The people who live in the Highlands at
large deserve the same efficient traffic circulation options.
The City's transportation consultant, in his study of our existing traffic
circulation (1989), forewarns us that as growth continues we are facing serious
traffic congestion problems due to our minimal collector road system. To
consider deleting Shepard Road then would be detrimental to the residents and
beneficial only to the developer, whose construction costs would be reduced.
Further, if the Shepard Road right-of-way were diverted to connect only to
MacGregor Road to the south, an unsound traffic design would result. This
connection would direct collector road traffic down a local street with 72
residential driveway cuts. And even beyond that hazard, traffic moving between
MacGregor Road and S. R. 434 would necessar 11 y use either Sheoah Boulevard or
one of the local streets in the North Orlando area, neither of which routes
should be impacted by additional traffic: the Sheoah - S.R. 434 intersection at
the Elementary School is not a proper place to dump traffic designed to travel
eastward to Edgemon Avenue; neither would it be acceptable to load Banbay
Avenue with that traffic.
Shepard Road is designed and so far has been bull t to proper collector road
standards, with no residential driveway cuts, and should be completed as such.
e
e
e
Planning and Zoning Board
October 30, 1990
Page 2
To redirect Shepard Road to avoid connection with its intended outlet arrl
instead create hazardous situations on local residential streets arrl at a
school crossing is not a valid option.
Besides traffic efficiency and safety, the planned Shepard Road connection to
Edgemon Avenue serves two civic functions. By this route, young people and
seniors will benefit fran a shorter trip to Sunshine Park arrl City emergency
vehicles will have a faster response time to the northern area of the
Highlands.
As to the conjecture that the Edgemon Avenue connection will draw additional
outside traffic through the Highlands, study of the map of this area of Winter
Springs demonstrates this concern is not valid. Arrione wishing to leave S.R.
434 and drive through the Highlands to U.S. 17-92 can do so now, via North
Edgemon, North TItird Street, Sheoah Boulevard, and Shepard Road.
~
Jacqueline Koch
Director of Administrative Services/
Comprehensive Planning
e
TO:
DON LEBLANC, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR
FROM:
John Govoruhk, Chief of Police
DATE:
October 8, 1990
SUBJ:
YOUR LETTER OF SEPTEMBER 25, 1990 (Alteration to the
Preliminary Development Plan for the Highlands PUD)
32-90
e
Presently the Highlands is isolated from other sections in the City.
In the event an Officer is on 17-92 and receives emergency (burglar-
prowler-fire-rescue) 9-1-1 calls on the North section of 434 thru 419,
then there is a long delay for response, which has and will happen more
frequently due to population, and traffic growth.
This alternate route, will decrease response considerably which can
mean saving a life, be it a citizen or Officer in need of help and/or
may result in the apprehension of criminals. The extension would also
mean more effective patroling of the area.
Concern of traffic problems that this could cause would be monitored by
the Traffic Division of Winter Springs Police Department and a few well
placed speed limit stop signs. Regular enforcement by the Traffic Officer
would help detour thru traffic.
/ ~/J& 4':/' 7
( :::?-: ,/
/Iv-' ' , ' .,~..I...-
/j7'Jon ~k
, Chief of Police
JG/eds
e
,
,
.
December 5, 1990
TO:
City Manager ~
Land Development Coordinator . .
FROM:
RE:
Agenda Item, Easement Vacation
e
This is a request of L. Gastley, through his attorney, to vacate a
portion of a utility easement located at the rear of the property
at 112 Murphy Road.
Please see attached letters from the various utility companies
offering no objection and a plat depicting that portion of the
easement to be vacated.
ffg
attach.
cc: Mayor
Commission
City Attorney
City Clerk
e
.
AI A. Cheneler, P .A.
Attorney At Law
Reply To:
P.O. Box 680642
Orlando. Florida 32868-0642
(407) 628-2804
2180 Park Avenue. North
Suite 110
Winter Park. Florida 32789
November 29, 1990
Mr. Don LeBlanc
Land Development Coordinator
City of Winter Springs
1126 E. S.R. 434
Winter Springs, Florida 32708
VIA HAND DELIVERY
Dear Mr. LeBlanc:
On hehalf of my client, Lawrence R. Gastley, I request that the following
easement be vacated:
e
COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 2, BLOCK H, NORTH ORLANDO
TERRACE SECTION ONE OF UNIT ONE, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 16, PAGE 63,
PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, RUN THENCE N69'53'00"E ALONG
THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 2 A DISTANCE OF 19.00 FEET TO A POINT OF
BEGINNING; CONTINUE THENCE N69'53 'OO"E ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE A DISTANCE
OF 50.00 FEET; THENCE S20'07'00"E A DISTANCE OF 7.50 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY
LINE OF A 7.5 FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT; THENCE S69'53'00"W ALONG SAID
SOUTHERLY LINE A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET; THENCE N20'07'00"W A DISTANCE OF
7.50 FEET TO SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT 2 AT THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINS 375 SQUARE FEET.
Unfortunately, a built-in swimming pool and cool deck lie directly on the
utility easement. As a result, potential buyers will not purchase the property
unless the easement is vacated. It is critical that this 7.5 foot easement be
vacated as quickly as possible in order for Mr. Gastley to be able to sell his
property.
This easement is a utility easement and, for your convenience, 1S
highlighted on the enclosed survey. Assuming the request for vacation is
granted, no other property owners will be denied access to or from their
property.
All parties having any interest in the easement have confirmed in wr1tlng
that they have no interest in the utility easement and have no objection to your
granting our request for vacation. In support of our application, enclosed
please find:
1.
Letter from CableVision of Central Florida;
Ilt~ttllwrt~
NOV 3 0 1990
C1T.Y. OE WINTER SPRINGS
rand Development CoordinatOl.:
e
2.
Letter from Florida Power Corporation;
.
Mr. Don LeBlanc
Land Development Coordinator
November 29, 1990
3. Letter from Southern Bell;
4. Letter from United Telephone System;
5. Letter from Enron Gas Pipeline Operating Company;
6. Letter from Peoples Gas System, Inc.; and
7. Letter from South Seminole & North Orange County Wastewater
Transmission Authority.
As you instructed, I have enclosed our firm's check 1n the amount of
$200.00 to process this application.
It is essential that this easement be vacated as quickly as possible. If
you need any additional information or have any questions, please do not hesitate
to contact me.
Sine?? t:L
~heneler
e
AAC:crr
Enclosures
e
.-
.
SOUTH SEMINOLE & NORTH ORANGE COUNTY
WASTEWATER TRANSMISSION AUTHORITY
410 LAKE HOWELL ROAD
P.O. BOX 941837
MAITLAND. FLORIDA 32794-1837
TELEPHONE (407) 628-3419
OCr ()
9 {~4?
October 2, 1990
.
Al A. Cheneler, P.A.
Attorney at Law
PO Box 680642
Orlando, FL 32868-0642
RE: VACATION OF EASEMENT
Dear Mr. Cheneler:
We are in receipt of your September 14, 1990 letter regarding
your representation of Mr. Lawrence R. Gastley in his desire to
have an easement vacated.
e
We do not have any facilities in or around the area described
in the survey.
Yours very truly,
._ I /)
~~:!::l:. ~r.
Executive Director
gd
cc: Lowry Rockett
WTA-90-274
e
~
Peoples
GAS SYSTJE~ . Ino.
.
DIVISION OFFICES
600 W. ROBINSON STREET . P.O. BOX 2433
ORLANDO. FLORIDA 32802
TELEPHONE (407) 425-4661
October 2,
1990
Al A. Cheneler, P.A.
P. O. Box 680642
Orlando, FL 32868-0642
e
RE:
Lawrence R. Gastley concerning a seven and one-
half foot utility easement
Dear Mr. Cheneler:
The area of concern is not Peoples Gas System, Inc.,
natural gas area. It may be Florida Public Utility out
of Sanford.
If I can be of further assistance, please call me at
(407)425-4661, extension 240.
Very truly yours,
PEOPLES GAS SYSTEM, INC.
!6~. t':::. '1aJr4JV\
Division Engineer
LlrlM/dm
cc
e
.
e
e
l:"-"
~
ENR~N
Gas Pipeline Operating Company
Operator for Florida Gas Transmission Company
Steer lake Road P. O. Box 616898 Orlando, Florida 32861.6898 (407) 295.4341
OCTOBER 3. 19'10
AL A. CHENELER
ATTORNEY AT LAW
P. O. BOX 68064:2
ORLANDO. FL 32868-0642
DEAR MR. CHENELER:
RE: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 2.
BLOCK H. NORTH ORLANDO TERRACE SECTION ONE OF UNIT
ONE. AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 16. PAGE 63. PUBLIC
RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY. FLORIDA. RUN THENCE N69
53'OO"E ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 2 A
DISTANCE OF 19.00 FEET TO A POINT OF BEGINNING:
CONT I NUE THENCE [\J69 53' 00" E ALONG SA I D NORTHERLY
LINE A DISTA[\JCE OF 50.00 FEET: THENCE S20 07'00" E
A DISTANCE 7.50 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF A 7.5
i-="OOT UT I L I TY EASEI1ENT: THENCE S69 53' 00" W ALONG
SAID SOUTHERLY LINE A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET:
fHENCE N20 07' 00" v.J A D I STANCE OF 7.50 FEET TO SA I D
NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT 2 AT THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINS 375 FEET.
ENRON GAS PIPELINE OPERATING COMPANY/FLORIDA GAS HAS NO
OBJECTIONS AT THE PROPOSED VACATION REFERENCED ABOVE.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CALL ME AT
(407/295-4341). THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION.
SINCERELY.
~~E~
DISTRICT 11ANAGER
RE8,lkb
attachment
Part of the Enron Group of Energy Companies
.
e
e
-'-
~-
... United
... Telephone
..." System
United Telephone Company of Florida
Box 3000 · Altamonte Springs, Florida 32715.3000
OCT 11 1990
October 5, 1990
Al A. Cheneler
862 West Morse Blvd., Suite 225
Winter Park, Florida 32789
RE: ABANDONMENT OF 15 FOOT REAR UTILITY EASEMENT
Dear Mr. Cheneler:
United Telephone Company of Florida has no objection to the abandon-
ment of the fifteen (15) foot wide utility easement on the north side
of the lot located at 112 Murphy Road, Winter Springs, Florida. This
lot is in the Southern Bell territory and not in the United Telephone
serving area. You need to refer to Southern Bell and use this number
327-7824, which works at that location as a reference.
Should you require further assistance, please contact me at 830-3151.
Sincerely,
~:::. aL
Engineer-Distribution
JCOfnw(1.8l)
e
e
.
~
@
Southern Bell
M. B. Bryan
Manager - Engineering
225 E. Robinson Street, Suite 300
P. O. Box 2949
Orlando, Florida 32802-2949
(407) 237-3478
October 9, 1990
Mr. Lawrence R. GastIey
c/o Al A. ChemeIer, P.A.
P.O. Box 680642
Orlando, FL 32868-0642
RE: Vacation of a 7 1/2 foot utility easement at the rear of
Lot 2, Block H, North Orlando Terrace, Section one of unit
One according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book
16 at page 63 of the public records of Seminole County,
Florida.
Dear Mr. Gastley:
Our Engineering Department has reviewed the vacation request
stated above and has no objection to its being granted, due to
the lot in question being in United Telephone Territory. It is
our suggestion you contact United Telephone with your request.
If we can be of further assistance, please contact Mary Forrest
at (407) 237-3501.
Yours truly, ~
.~~
anager-Engineering
KAR:laa
attachment
A ~L.c:;n JT~ C'.nmnAmJ
.
~......
....e....
:. .ft. .,.
...0...
~. -.0 -:
.........
.......
Florida
Power
CORPORATION
November 29, 1990
Al A. Cheneler
P. O. Box 680642
Orlando, FL 32868-0642
RE: Lot 2, North Orlando Terrace Section One, Unit One
Dear Mr. Cheneler:
Florida Power Corporation has no objection to the abandonment
of the 7.5 foot wide easement as described in the attached Sketch
of Description.
~~ C;;;~~~,-~/~
e
Rosemary Z. Gruenbaum
Easement Specialist
cc: R. D. Bowman
1. E. Raihl
J. S. Hendrix
.
JAMESTOWN ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
STATE ROAD 426 · POST OFFICE BOX 417 · WINTER PARK, FLORIDA 32790-0417
A Florida Proaress Comoanv
.
CableVision of Central Florida
A Division of American Television and Communications Corporation
A TIME WARNER INC. COMPANY
November 29, 1990
Al A. Cheneler, P.A.
P.O. Box 680642
Orlando, FL 32868
Dear Mr. Cheneler:
Cablevision of Central Florida has no objection to vacating
the following utility easement described below:
It
COMMEN:E AT THE NORI'HWESTERLY CORNER OF lOT 2, BU:X::K H, NORl'H ORLANDO
TERRACE SECTION ONE OF UNIT ONE, AS RflX)RDED IN PLAT BOOK 16, PAGE 63,
PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FlORIDA, RUN THEN:E N69053'00"E AWN:;
THE IDRTHERLY LINE OF SAID I.DT 2 A DISTANCE OF 19.00 FEET TO A POINI' OF
BEGINNIN3; CONTINUE THENCE N69053' OO'E AWN:; SAID IDRTHERLY LINE A DISTANCE
OF 50.00 FEET; THEN:E S20007'00''E A DISTANCE OF 7.50 FEET TO THE SOOTHERLY
LINE OF A 7.5 FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT; THEN:E S69 0 53' OO"W AWN:; SAID
SOUTHERLY LINE A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET; THEN:E N20007'00''W A DISTANCE
OF 7.50 FEET TO SAID IDRTHERLY LINE OF I.DT 2 AT THE FOINI' OF BEGINNIN:;.
CONTAINS 375 SQUARE FEET.
If you have any questions or need additional information,
please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
afZi)~
Construction
cc: file
e
PROVIDING ENTERTAINMENT AND INFORMATION SERVICES 10 CENTRAL FLORIDA FROM COAST 10 COAST
3767 All American Boulevard. Orlando, FL 32810 . (407) 295-9119 . Fax (407) 578-0979
.
WINTER SPRINGS WATER & SEWER WEST
1 NORTH FAIRFAX AVENUE
WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708
Telephone (407) 327-1641
November 30, 1990
Al A. Cheneler, P.A.
P.O. Box 680642
Orlando, FL 32868-0642
Dear Mr. Cheneler:
Winter Springs Water & Sewer West has no objection to
vacating the easement described as follows:
e
COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 2,BLOCK H,
NORTH ORLANDO TERRACE SECTION ONE OF UNIT~ ONE, AS RE-
CORDED IN PLAT BOOK 16, PAGE 63, PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE
COUNTY, FLORIDA, RUN THENCE N69053'00"E ALONG THE NORTHERLY
LINE OF SAID LOT 2 A DISTANCE OF 19.00 FEET TO A POINT OF
BEGINNING: CONTINUE THENCE N69053' OO"E ALONG SAID NORTHERLY
LINE A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET: THENCE S20007'00''E A DISTANCE
OF 7.50 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF A 7.5 FOOT UTILITY
EASEMENT: THENCE S69053'00"W ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE A
DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET; THENCE N20007'00''W A DISTANCE OF
7.50 FEET TO SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT 2 AT THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
If I can be of any further assistance, please do not
hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
J~~
Doug Taylor
Utility Manager
DT/ble
e
SKE:~~H OF DES CR I ~-'r I ON
DESCRIPTION
PROPOSED VACATED UTILITY EASEMENT
COMMENCE at the Northwesterly corner of Lot 2, Block H, NORTH ORLANDO
TERRACE SECTION ONE OF UNIT ONE, as recorded in Plat Book 16, Page 63,
Public Records of Seminole County, Florida, run thence N69053'00"E along
the Northerly line of said Lot 2 a distance of 19.00 feet to a POINT OF
BEGINNING; continue thence N690 53' OO"E along said Northerly line a
distance of 50.00 feet; thence S20007'00"E a distance of 7.50 feet to the
Southerly line of a 7.5-Foot Utility Easement; thence S69053'00"W along
said Southerly line a distance of 50.00 feet; thence N200 07'OO"W a
distance of 7.50 feet to said Northerl~r line of Lot 2 and the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
Contains 375
Lqf/
N.
St:.i s/d. IR.
LR 4-475
MINT OF CPMEI'KENh"df.
NW1- c.,.,. I~
\,J
~
"
~ ,}
~~
~
~~
~,
\4:~
.
IV'I
"
~
~
~
,
~
~
.~
'"
Lot3
..:c
l1.
l..
Q)
~
Q)
c
Q) -
.c -
u
..:c
....
..:c
o1l
:>.
0)
r-I
oW
rn
"'
~
:>.
"'
tt:
Q)
U
c::
0),
l..
~
"'
...J
..
0
.jJ
oW
U
Q)
l..
l..
0
U
~
0)
.~
~
.~
.j.J
s..
Q)
{.)
3.~'
WO;J[;)
DEe. K
""
""
,
u..
~
....,
\......3."
f,
a ~ CtM./c.e.~re BLoCK
HOU.$E
A OCIE't!'"JJ ... 112
ZO'
-1.45 .
~
<!\
~h)
...
I'...
~~
o
~
<:
~.8Z'
, 7.87'
1/\
" 'I:)C~
"J 'to 'II'
N ,
i"'l
, l)
20.1 ' ,
....
. C.P. (J)' C\/
~ '"
7' M
~ 20.0ft . ....
\J {(P , 2
,
" ili,(/~ .
D(W
L ~ <::: /,5
^"'l
........
()
tSc r $/8 '. IN. '-J
L& 44-7.5
'..i
~
2/.07'
e
CIl . c.....", _" UIIff. I... PI,.
,. . h.. 1M t;Lr . e.....' L'.k ,....
w · "'* re.... :r-. '.: a~:;o~;:::...,
:", . ":~:i.:i ~:r-...-' .... . .....,.r..
,.. . rvu41 c* , Dr h...,
C.... . C....,." cr . CoM...... ,..
. . I.'t.. " . An ..."',..
A.D..... T" . T"l..'
PC , ,.,.\.ot-a.,...,,,,.. " . ,...'.0'.'.....,
..It hl.,..O'..I.w,...".. IV . ."__,,
'*1. . 1Ir.1_ .... ,\1 II" ......, .
.sr;r.s:t.~"u.. '
L1 = /.3 (12 {J 1147" __J...8....4. 7 s, ~
R;::. 1- Z If. 13 ' I \..:
L :: {;/. F4-' - e. tf;1.7~
"Sw. CO .
LOr'
~!C..
..s/6" I;'(p
(J1,j; 1J,5' ~
16'
-- --.---..-----..-~ ~f) ',.f'/wJ
__---t.-----;W; R'p1! r RtJlIIJ
THIS SKETCH IS NOT A SURVEY.
I HEtEBY CEtTIFY THIIT THII 'KETCH II flU( ftNO
CORtf:CT TO THE tEST 01 "' ICMOlIlEDCE. ftNO TM"T
THI' '"TCH 1Irt1'. TIC '"INI"Un TICMllICIII.
ITftNOlItO., III lfeulHO tv CIWTra tI 1lH-t
n.OllIOft toIIIO 01 LIIIlD fUlllno.. 'UltIHlllT TO
8ECTlOlI nt.o21 fLOIIOI ""TU1'.
j ttf/!!/ C//! Jf/!!fj'fJ'
~...,. '2'0'N' .t~. .IR.~n..t i ~ }~n:.: S ';:.....,
I \ 0,. I and 0 , F I 0 ,. '1 d CI 32 903
( ~e7) 89~-631 ~
PREPARED FOR
LAWRE~CE RAr C-AS.TLEY I
,4L A. CNENEL/:L, P,4.
,I
FRANK A.1A~"7LS 'fo'01
/'.: ;!t:1'
. 6-,1Z
REVIIlO"81
H "
.
e
e
, .
. ,
December 6, 1990
TO:
City Manager
FROM:
Land Development
coordinato~
RE: Agenda Item, Woodstream Addition
This is for Commission action on the Final Engineering for
Woodstream Addition. Please see attached Staff Review and
plat.
ffg
attach.
cc: Mayor
Commission
City Attorney
City Clerk
e
December 6, 1990
TO:
City Manager
coordinatolf!)
FROM:
Land Development
RE: Staff Review, Woodstream Addition
e
The above referenced was held on December 4, 1990. S. Blaney and
R. White represented the project. Staff members present were
Artman, DeWitt, Govoruhk, Holzman, Koch, Kozlov, LeBlanc and
McKinney.
Please see attached Staff comments.
/fg
attach.
cc: Staff
e
e
e
e
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708
Telephone (407) 327-1800
November 9, 1990
Mr. Robert Y. White, P.E.
1502 Fabian Avenue
Orlando, FL 32807
Re: Woodstream Addition Revised Final Engineering Review
Dear Mr. White:
The revised final engineering and documentation for the Woodstream
Addition was received on November 9, 1990. After review of this
submittal, it was found to be satisfactory.
Upon completion of the project, you will have to submit a "Letter
of Certification", three (3) sets of "as-built" engineering and three
hundred dollars ($300.00) for an "as-built" inspection fee.
If you have any questions, please contact this office.
Sincerely,
mj/fg
cc: City Manager
Land Development Coordinator
Building Official
e
November 21, 1990
TO: Land Development Coordinator
FROM: Building Official ~~
RE: Staff Review, Woodstream Addition
e
The Building Department has no record of the Letter of Transmittal
to Florida Power for the lighting plan.
ffg
e
e
e
e
WINTER SPRINGS WATER & SEWER EAST
890 NORTHERN WAY, C-1
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708
Telephone (407) 365-3025
DECEMBER 4, 1990
TO:
LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR
MIKE DEW I TT fY'Ihr
WOODSTREAM ADDITION, REVISION
FROM:
RE:
1) Block E, Lot 8, no sewer
2) Lot 14, no water service
3) Block D, Lot 2 has two water services
4) Unnecessary valves on Blaney Court, Nackasha Court, and
Woburn Court
5) Service connections ( curb stops) shall be a minimum of 2'
above finish grade and all curb stops shall be Ford locking
wing type
III
e
e
e
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708
Telephone (407) 327-1800
TO: Land Development Coordinator
FROM: G. E. Artman <4.1' ~t)
DATE: December 4, 1990
SUBJECT: Woodstream Addition
*********************************************************************
In accordance with Code of Ordinances, Section 9-203, all street signs
will be installed by Public Works and the developer will pay for the cost
of these signs.
Arbor requirements have been satisfied.
e
TO:
DON LEBLANC, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR
FROM:
JOHN GOVORUHK, CHIEF OF POLICE
DATE:
4 December 1990
SUBJ:
WOOD STREAM ADDITION
44-90
House Numbers will be posted, per City Ordinance Sec. 9-374.
ALL STREET NAME(S) (with STREET NUMBER and ARROW), and any other
approved signs are to be installed by Public Works (Sec. 9-203, 9-204).
e
Only mailboxes as approved by the U.S. Post Office standards are to
be in the RIGHT-OF-WAY, BREAK-A-WAY "NO CONCRETE".
Golf Cart sign(s) to be installed and Road Markings to be painted.
All markings on road-ways are to be THERMOPLASTIC and conforms with
Roadway and Design Standard specification issued by F.D.O.T..
A~%
~~clJ~1f<:
/ Chief of Police
I /
'./
:fZ-? . 'J
/,'/
./'/
/l.-. .
~
JG/eds
.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
102 NORTH MOSS ROAD
WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708
TELEPHONE (407) 327-2332
FIRE AND
RESCUE
SERVICES
December 5, 1990
MEMORANDUM
TO: Land Planning Coordinator
Don LeBlanc ~/
FROM: Fire Chief ~
SUBJECT: Woodstream Addition
e
There are no particular problems with Woodstream addition since this
was previously approved with the single entrance/egress point. However,
the memo to me from the Fire Marshal is attached to reflect his views of
the continuation of single point entrance/egress projects, particularly
larger density ones that isolate a significant number of residents.
CLH/pjs
~ Attachment/
.0
- .
(DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE)
Chief C. L. Holzman
DEP'T
Fire
FROM
SUBJEC~oodstream Subdi~ision plans
Capt. R. E. Dallas
e
e
Once again with this project,
with but one entrance/egress
density than Eagle Ridge for
the single exit route should
necessity.
DEP'T
Fire
DATE 12/05/90
we are creating a solitary little kingdom,
point. Although it is much smaller insize and
instance, a similar problem could arise with
an emergency evacuation of the area become a
This problem should be addressed to keep this same thing from coming up
TIME and TIME again. I would hope it does not take a catastrophe to bring
the importance of this issue to its proper place.
Other than this we have no problem with the plans as submitted.
cc/ land development coordinator
Capt. R. E. Dallas
Fire Marshal, W.S.F.D.
e
December 6, 1990
TO: Land Development Coordinator
FROM: Director of Administrative Services/Comprehensive Planningr7~
;?2.-
SUBJECT: Woodstream Addition Final Engineering
e
The construction plans for this completion of Woodstream incorporate all
the planning aspects discussed with the preliminary review. One minor
additional point to be noted is the double frontage of Lots 13 and 14;
it was agreed to preclude access to one of the cul-de-sacs these lots abut,
so that the homes will be oriented consistently with adjacent homes.
The plat for this development as presented does not yet show all required
drainage, conservation, and utility easements. This needs to be examined
again when corrected.
/cm
.
.
December 6, 1990
TO:
City Manager
/})
coordinatorW
FROM:
Land Development
RE: Agenda Item, Eagle Ridge (Project 434)
e
This is for Commission Action on the Final Engineering for the
project. Please see attached Staff comments.
Also attached are the Commission Meeting Minutes of December 12, 1988
approving the Preliminary Engineering and pages 3 and 4 of the
Developer's Agreement which address Trotwood Boulevard and Alton Road.
The developer has requested a waiver for sidewalks (Section 9-221 of
the Code) between lots 298 and 299. Please see McIntosh letter
dated November 9, 1990.
ffg
attach.
cc: Mayor
Commission
City Attorney
City Clerk
e
.
December 6, 1990
TO:
FROM:
City Manager ~
Land Development Coordinato~
RE:
Staff Review, Eagle Ridge (Project 434)
e
The above referenced was held on November 27, 1990. C. True
and B. Porter represented the project. Staff members present
were Govoruhk, Holzman, Koch, Kozlov, LeBlanc, McKinney and
Taylor.
The developer is re.questing a waiver to the sidewalk requirements
between lots 298 and 299 on Dendron Avenue. This will be presented
to the Commission.
The commercial section of the property, entryway to S.R. 434,
requires sidewalks to be five (5) feet in width.
See attached Staff comments.
ffg
attach.
.
.
e
.
I_I DONALD W. McINTOSH As~cl.".. Inc. =~~-,~,~,.-,"-~,,"_.,---
November 9, 1990
~lt~t\lWltij
NOV 0 q 1990
Mr. Donald LeBlanc
Land Development Coordinator
City of Winter Springs
1126 State Road 434
Winter Springs, Florida 32708
Re: Eagle Ridge
Dear Mr. LeBlanc:
CITY. OF WINTER SPRI.NGS.
l:and Development Coordinator
On behalf of Gulfstream Housing Corp. (Bel-Aire Homes), owner and developer of the
Eagle Ridge Subdivision, we hereby respectfully request a variance from Sec. 9-221 of the
Land Development Code in the area adjacent to the conselVation area between lots 298 and
299 on Dendron Avenue.
In order to return to natural ground at the right-of-way line and avoid encroachment into the
FDER and SJRWMD jurisdictional area, it is necessary to grade off the back of curb at a
5:1 slope. A sidewalk would not be effective under these conditions, and as there are no
lots in this area, would serve no major purpose.
We presume this matter wi]] be addressed at the same City Council meeting as the fmal
engineering approval.
Your assistance in guiding and expediting this letter will be greatly appreciated
Sincerely,
DONALD W. McINTOSH ASSOCIATES, INC.
gUI;.
Betty po~er, E.!.
Project Engineer
Charles H. True, P.E.
Senior Vice President
c: Leonard T. Kozlov, P.E.
Roy T. Dye
Donald W. McIntosh, Jr.
Irlf
EC48S2
CIVIL ENGINEERS
LAND PLANNERS. SURVEYORS
.........
\ ,.
'<--'-:
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708
Telephone (407) 327-1800
.
November 12, 1990
Mr. Charles H. True, P.E.
Donald W. McIntosh & Associates
2200 Park Avenue North
Winter Park, FL 32789
Re: Eagle Ridge (a.k.a. 434 Partnership), Revised Final Engineering Review
Dear Charles:
Your revised final engineering for the subject project, received on
November 9, 1990, was found to be satisfactory.
Upon completion of each phase of the project, you will have to submit
a "Letter of Certification", three (3) sets of "as-built" engineering and
three hundred dollars ($300.00) for an "as-built" inspection fee.
e
If you have any questions, please contact this office.
mj/fg
cc: City Manager
..Land.-Development .,Coord1natQJ;.
Building Official
e
. ",
. ......
. . . ,
\~
.
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
'126 EAST STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708
Telephone (407) 327-' 800
October 31, 1990
Mr. Charles H. True, P.E.
Donald W. McIntosh and Assoc.
2200 Park Avenue North
Winter Park, FL 32789
Re: Eagle Ridge (a/k/a 434 Partnership, Revised Engineering Review - Bridge)
Dear Charlie:
Your revised final engineering for the subject project, received
on October 18, 1990, was found to be satisfactory.
e
Upon completion of Unit II of the Eagle Ridge project, you will
have to submit a "Letter of Certification", three (3) sets of
"as-built" engineering and three hundred dollars ($300.00) for an
"as-built" inspection fee.
If you have any questions, please contact this office.
Sincerely,
./ \V 'o./2/...v ~ VJ
/ -vwe; \^~ \.
/\ \1-V' .f)Y."\.' ,-'7 .J- '(,.. 0'0
\O~\~Q; \\
\~V- L,f/'yc~j' o@.iJ
~~ if~~;Y ! \\\9 (!7
Q-~~~ / \'tl
~~
(
mj/fg
cc: City Manager
Land Development Coordinator
Building Official
.
.
e
.
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708
Telephone (407) 327-1800
TO:
Land Development Coordinator
G. E. Artman -~~t?
DATE: November 20, 1990
FROM:
SUBJECT: Eagle Ridge (Project 434 Partnership)
*********************************************************************
In accordance with Code of Ordinances, Section 9-203, all
street signs will be installed by Public Works and the developer
will pay for the cost of these signs.
In accordance with Section 5-3, an Arbor Permit must be
obtained prior to any land clearing for this development.
._00-
.
November 27, 1990
TO:
Land Development Coordinator
Building Official ~
RE: Eagle Ridge (Project 434 Partnership)
FROM:
This department has not received the Letter of Transmittal for the
lighting plan.
e
ffg
.
-- I
.
TO:
DON LEBLANC, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR
FROM:
JOHN GOVORUHK, CHIEF OF POLICE
DATE:
NOVEMBER 27, 1990
SUBJ:
EAGLE RIDGE (PROJECT 434)
43-90
House Numbers will be posted, per City Ordinance Sec 9-374.
All STREET NAME(S) (with STREET NUMBER and ARROW), and any other approved
signs are to be installed by Public Works (Sec. 9-203, 9-204).
All BARRICADE(S) - To conform with F.D.O.T. construction and design.
e
Sidewalks - N of Project - COMMERCIAL 5' required.
Only mailboxes as approved by the U.S. Post Office standards are to be in
the RIGHT-OF-WAY, BREAK-A-WAY "NO CONCRETE".
All markings on road-ways are to be THERMOPLASTIC and conforms with Roadway
and Design Standard specification issued by F.D.O.T..
SPEED LIMIT (25 MPH) on Eagle Ridge Boulevard.
(20 MPH on all other streets.
;;:I,~ :;!/J ../1
~~// ,/"
~~/0/l/7~,~--'// -
/ 5-6hn ovoruhk / /t,
i// (Chief of PJl-l--ice
!/ ~
JG/eds
e
.
TO:
DON LEBLANC, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR
FROM:
JOHN GOVORUHK, CHIEF OF POLICE
DATE:
DECEMBER 6, 1990
SUBJ:
ADDENDUM TO MY MEMORANDUM DATED NOVEMBER 27, 1990 -
EAGLE RIDGE (PROJECT 434)
45-90
Accessibility requirements were inadvertently omitted from the above
referenced. For reasons of public safety, I am in complete agreement
with the Fire Chief's memorandum dated December 5, 1990. Each of these
should be addressed by the Commission before construction commences in
each of the concerned phases.
Also, the dirt road on the western side of the property is to be used only
for the infrastructure, construction portion of the project. subject to all
regulatory requirements.
e
JG/eds
.
.
e
.
WINTER SPRINGS WATER & SEWER WEST
1 NORTH FAIRFAX AVENUE
WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708
Telephone (407) 327-1641
December 3, 1990
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Don LeBlanc
Land Development Coordinator
Doug Taylor t91
Utility Manager W.S.W.S. West
Easement Agreement With Eagle Ridge Developer
The City of Winter Springs plans to install a reuse water line to
the super park sometime in the future. The most economical route
is from site #16 to the power esaement and follow it to the Cities
utility up to Highway 434.
We would like to have the Developer grant the City an easement to
the power line and any other agreements necessary to accomplish
this task.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
102 NORTH MOSS ROAD
WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708
TELEPHONE (407) 327-2332
FIRE AND
RESCUE
SERVICES
December 5, 1990
MEMORANDUM
TO: Land Planning Coordinator
FROM: Fire Chief ~
SUBJECT: Eagle Ridge
e
The particular layout and other factors in the Eagle Ridge Project are
acceptable except the limited access points to the entire project.
Because of the density of this project it is imperative in the interest
of public safety thut all four access points be open, i.e., S.R. 434, Alton
Road, Sailfish Road, and Trotwood Boulevard for entry and egress.
The current and foreseeable future of the excess traffic flow, tie ups,
and frequent blockage of S.R. 434 will cause residents as well as public
safety and service units to be blocked from entry or egress from the project.
This City is already plagued with too many IIdeep pocketll communities
with limited access points. Eagle Ridge is entirely too large for such limit-
ed access. I cannot, in good conscience vote in favor of this project until
all available access points, as indicated, are open.
The Fire Marshal IS comments are also attached for your information.
CLH/pjs
Attachment/
.
.0
\,
"\,
(DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE)
Chiel C. L. Holzman
DEP'T
Fir!>
FROM CaD t. R. E. D a 11 a s
DEP'T
Fire
SUBJECT Final construction plans. Eagle Ridge
e
.
DATE 12/0')/90
The fire department wishes to make quite clear that this construction area,
being as large and with the density of the project, MUST have more than one
entrance/egress point.
It is our recommendation that the following streets be through streets into
and out of the project;
Trotwood Boulevard
Sailfish Road
Alton Road
State Road 434
With only one entrance/egress route in the project, a great many people
could become trapped therein should a major incident take place which blocked
the one escape route.
Not only does the possibility exist of people being trapped within the project,
but the fire department apparatus could also be blocked from entrance.
There appear to be no other problems with the project, however, this major
stumbling block MUST be overcome.
~
Capt. R. E. Dallas
Fire Marshal, W.S.F.D.
cc/ land development coordinator
.
December 6, 1990
TO: Land Development Coordinator
FROM: Director of Administrative Services/Comprehensive Plannin~
SUBJECT: Final Engineering for Eagle Ridge
Thennal engineering for Eagle Ridge includes all the requirements noted on
the approval of the preliminary plan regarding road configuration and open
space.
e
The fact that the developer is presenting the engineering for the entire
subdivision, rather than Phase I alone, raises some issues at this time:
(1) The plans and plats presented include all of the park and conservation
land to be dedicated to the public. When asked whether these areas could be
dedicated at one time rather than piecemeal as each phase is platted, the
representative committed to dedication of all public lands concurrent with
platting of Phase I. However, no timetable for actual development is certain,
so when the City will acquire the property (especially the 20 acres at Alton
Road for an active park) is unknown. It was stated that prededication now
is impossible because of the complicated status of ownership of the land.
(2). The developer's agreement, paragraphs (h) and (i), stipulate that
decisions on the potential Trotwood and Alton Road connections will be made
"at such time as that particular phase....is presented to the City". Since
final engineering approval constitutes a development permit, these roads
should be discussed now, not at platting.
(3) Approval of all the final engineering at this time would vest the
development with respect to concurrency as long as construction proceeds in
accordance with the time limitation prescribed in the land development code.
If no construction occurs prior to expiration of the engineering approval,
which would fall after the effective date of the concurrency management
program in the new comprehensive plan, any authorization of an extension
would have to be in compliance with concurrency requirements.
.
/crn
---
.
Regular Meeting, City Commission, Dec. 12, 1988
Page 2
88-89-6
Commission was in agreement to have a vested rights hearing and it was set for
the first Monday in February, Feb. 6, 1989.
Moti Khemlani, President of the Tuscawilla Homeowners Association, Bob Lombard,
resident of Tuscawilla, David Brown of Broad & Cassel, Tim Johnson, Gator Lane, and
John Ferring, president of the Oak Forest Homeowners Association all spoke in
discussion.
PlanninR & Zonin2 Board Recommendations of Nov. 23. lqRR.
434 Partnership-Preliminary Engineering:
The Land Development Coordinator, Don LeBlanc, explained the Planning & Zoning Board
recommended approval with the stipulation that the Trotwood Boulevard connection be
deleted from the City's Comprehensive Plan and _recommended that only lots 394 thru
400 be granted outlets onto Trotwood Boulevard.
Mr. Donald McIntosh, of Donald W. McIntosh & Associates, a professional engineering
planning and surveying firm gave a brief overview of the project. The project is
presently proposed for 400 lots on the less than 400 acres with over 200 dedicated
to conservation and parks with a collector road proposed through the center of the
property north south consistent with Staff's direction and recommendation for
provision of access to the site with external road connections provided for in
addition to which right of way has been dedicated either in the form of parks,
conservation areas or right of way dedication, specifically at the Alton Road,
Trotwood Boulevard, Shore, Bahama and Alton areas. The environmental issues
regarding the project have been dealt with extensively in conjunction with all the
agencies having jurisdiction over this site for almost two years.
e
Mr. McIntosh said consistent with the Settlement Agreement, the Developer has provided
for the dedication of at least a 20 acre park site, as was mentioned earlier, there are
almost 55 acres of land set aside for park, in addition to which there are an additional
150 acres set aside for conservation. There are 400 units planned consistent with
R-lA zoning category classifications. Provision has bee~ made for the dedication of
the Bahama Road right of way which is in the extreme south end of the property.
Additionally the Developer will voluntarily contribute $25,000 to the improvements of
the site's park facilities in addition to dedicating the site itself. Entrance
improvements will be made during the first phase of the project to allow minimum of
two outbound and one inbound entry movement, accel and decel lanes along SR 434 and
west bound turning movement at the project entry as shown on the entry detail in the
report that has been presented. A voluntary contribution of $35,000 to signalize the
project entry to SR 434 - the actual commitment is to fund the signalization issue,
and to fund and promote the reports necessary to support the warrant and request the
warrant from Florida Dept. of Transportation.
A voluntary contribution will be made of $500 per unit to'be paid at the time building
permits are issued to be used toward the area school systems need. Mr. McIntosh said
they have voluntarily incorporated all the Staff's requests for provisions of the
north/south collector road through the property connection to the Oak Forest sub-
division to the south and to the development to the west.
,
'"
'"
~,........... ~
...
'/
,/
~
-
"'0
/'
;1
'--'
.....---
.'~"
Regular Meeting, City Commission, Dec. 12, 1988
Page 3
88-89-6
John Ferring, president of Oak Forest Homeowners Association, Ann Schneider,
Morton Lane, Spencer Harris, Baltic Lane all spoke in discussion.
Motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs for the approval of the preliminary engineering
plan on 434 Partnership subject to the building out of Alton and Trotwood extensions to
be determined at that phase in development. Seconded by Commissioner Ku1bes. Discussion.
In discussion, Commissioner Kaehler asked that if it is found that Alton Road and
Trotwood need to be extended for fire and police protection that they not be opened to
general traffic.
Motion was amended by Commissioner Kaehler to make sure that is taken care of and in
the developer's agreement, that Alton Road and Trotwood Boulevard not be opened to
general traffic, that they have breakaway gates and that we pursue other alternatives
and that these roads not be used for regular traffic only for police and fire.
Seconded by Commissioner Ku1bes. Discussion. Vote on the motion: Commissioner Hoffmann,
ayei Commissioner Ku1bes, aye; Commissioner Jacobs, aye; Commissioner Partyka, nay;
Commissioner Kaehler, aye; motion carried.
Mayor Grove called a recess at 10:55 p. m. and called the meeting back to order at
11:05 p. m.
Second Public Hearing on Fall 1988 Amendments to Comprehensive Plan-Adopted Land Use
Map:
1. Pt. Lots 26 and 27, Entz. Farms, Add. NO. 2/Rec1assify Land Use from Rural
Residential to Commercial (Zone C-1)/6.4 acres south of SR 434 east of SR 419
Intersection-Spears.
2. Pt. Lot 9, B1k.D, Mitchell Survey of Levy Grant/Add to Winter Springs Land Use
Map as Commercial (Zone R-U) (Reclassification from Seminole County General Rural)
/6.3 Acres south of SR 434 east of SR 419-Pa1mer and Van Bibber.
3. Lots 1-4. Pt. Lots 5-6, P.K. Yonge Grant; and Lots 3-7, Pt. Lot 8, B1k.A,Mitche11
Survey of Levy Grant/Reclassify Land Use from Rural Residential to Commercial
(Zone C-1)414 Acres east of Brantley Ave., north of SR 434-Schrimsher.
Mayor Grove recessed the Commission Meeting and opened the public hearing on the Fall
Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. Miss Koch, the City Planner, explained this is
the second public hearing on the fall set of amendments to our Comprehensive Plan.
These amendments were reviewed by the Local Planning Agency in public hearing in August.
The Commission reviewed them in September. The information was sent to the State and
the letter from the Department of Community Affairs has been received by the City.
There were no comments from the audience. A letter was received from George T. Hyde
and Gretchen H. Hyde, 1166 Orange Ave., Winter Springs. FL 32708 as follows: We
respectfully request that the zoning change 13 from rural residential to commercial
be denied. We have been residents of Florida and Seminole County for 16 years, and
after looking for a long time, purchased a home on Lake Jessup at 1166 Orange Ave.
We made the decision based on the location and rural setting. With a purchase price
of $170,000. We are concerned about the potential negative effect on our property
value, however our major concern is the change in land usage. Signed George T. Hyde and
Gretchen H. Hyde. Re: Lots 1-4 Pt. Lots 5-6,P.K.Yonge Grant; and Lots 3-7, Pt. Lot 8,
B1k. A, Mitchell Survey of Levy Grant.
Mayor Grove closed the public hearing and reconvened the Commission Meeting.
..1
-.;,f.
.
two (2) outbound and one (1) inbound entry movements, accelera-
tion and deceleration lanes, along State Road 434, and a west-
bound left-turn movement at the project entry, as shown in that
certain State Road 434 map prepared by Donald W. McIntosh Associ-
ates, Inc., attached hereto as Exhibit "E" and made a part
hereof, subject to all applicable governmental agency approvals.
(e) 434 agrees to pay FIVE HUNDRED ($500.00) per unit
to the CITY, at the time each individual house building permit is
issued, to be used toward public school system needs, within the
CITY.
(f) 434 agrees to make application to FOOT when
requested by the CITY and to pay for the cost of the installation
and cost of a traffic signal at the intersection of the northern
e
project entry and State Road 434, subject to the FOOT approval
and other applicable governmental agency approvals.
(g) 434 agrees to incorporate within the Preliminary
Plan, the CITY staff's request for the provision of a north/
south collector road through the Property (Street A), and shall
have the obligation to construct said collector road from SR 434
to a distance approximately 1,400 feet north of the property's
south boundary, as shown on the approved Preliminary Plan dated
November 10, 1988.
(h) 434 agrees to incorporate within the Preliminary
Plan, the CITY's request for a connection through the Oak Forest
subdivision/Trotwood Boulevard stubout located near the
Property's southeastern boundary. The decision as to how this
~ connection shall be made will be determined and decided upon by
the City Commission at such time as that particular phase of the
development which abuts the proposed Trotwood Boulevard
connection is presented to the CITY. At such time the CITY
shall, in its discretion, determine whether such connection shall
.
be (1) a connection for police and fire protection with no public
access, and in that event 434 shall install breakaway gates as
approved by the CITY or (2) no connection whatsoever. 434 agrees
to construct the connection based upon the CITY's determination
at such time.
3
C/FPF
5255AGTa
2/15/89.1
J
, ',~
I
!
,/'
In the event that neither option is selected by the CITY or a
partial connection is required pursuant to item (1) above, and
the CITY decides to construct an alternative connection within
./
the Right of Ways or other property dedicated to the CITY on the
attached Preliminary Plan, and only in the event of such con-
struction, 434 agrees to provide the cost of road improvements
(less credit for any partial connection as referenced in item (1)
above) which shall be calculated and determined as follows:
Donald W. McIntosh Associates, Inc., 2200 Park Avenue North,
Winter Park, Florida 32789 and/or another State of Florida
Licensed Engineer shall submit to the CITY a certified statement
of the construction costs for the Trotwood connection. Said
costs shall be subject to review and approval by the City
.
Engineer. Said payment shall be due forty five (45) days after
the CITY has determined that the Trotwood connection will not be
made, and the receipt of all applicable permits by the CITY for
the construction of the southern connection.
(i) 434 agrees to incorporate within the Preliminary
Plan, the CITY'S request for a connection to the Alton Road stub-
out located near the Property's northwestern boundary. The deci-
sion as to how this connection shall be made will be determined
and decided upon by the City Commission at such time as that
particular phase of the development which abuts the proposed
Alton connection is presented to the CITY. At such time the CITY
shall, in its discretion, determine whether such connection shall
be (1) a connection for police and fire protection with no public
~ access, and in that event 434 shall install breakaway gates as
approved by the CITY or (2) no connection whatsoever. 434 agrees
to construct the connection based upon the CITY'S determination
at such time.
(j) 434 will underdrain all streets within the
Property, as required by the City Engineer.
(k) 434 agrees to mandate, develop, and implement as a
~ part of the proposed project the formation of a mandatory Home-
owner's Association ("Association"). The Association shall be
4
C/FFF
5255AGTa
2/15/89.1
.
e
.
BABE RUTH YOUTH BASEBALL - A PROPOSAL
WHO: Babe Ruth Youth Baseball is a not for profit, all
volunteer, community effort, to provide structure and
approved recreation for the boys and girls of our community.
WHY: To provide supervised recreation with a goal of
insuring that each child feel good about themselves and their
ability to succeed and work with others.
WHERE: Babe Ruth needs fields to provide these services to a
growing number of children in our fast growing community.
WHEN:
March thru June 1991
PRESIDENT: Dr. Robert Scott
(407) 646-4305 Work
(407) 365-8456 Home
(407) 365-4040 Home
COMMISSIONER: Mickey Norton
."
e
Me/V\6
. '0 ~ rn~l(oz Dr-..>~ fY\€MBee.S CJ~ ~ CC(j'( C6MML~~((,;\)
. f-/Otlf' : '\Zr~ N ~ ~rLli?~t-.lb{\( ~ J C I.~ ~ ~4:J-
J>i\(f~ '. \;) \ \ 0 \~ (J
{2Q.', MdnckQ s.eM'- 6X@l~/\dzrz~ ~
Z tue(~ ~ (\~(~ \e.kfec
~cQf\~ ~,~ ~ t~(<2SQf,JClI\(S)(.,() d- V-lfl<;:
. ~ ""~ &u 1\\\ \ l:, <;. V".u JJ'-\.. (' e<; I. &C'~, ~
~d\l~~ {w -s.\.uu\D c;;eo S(\~~ ((s<;:{(se,
~\.& ~ ~~ I\~a ~1J<"'-""'~()vs.J
C?le(\.~
5e.Q ~
,
.
I-
I
, I
Dear NeishbO~j Doo. I, 1990
On Monday, Nov. 26, 1990, the Winte~ Sp~ingB CO=m1oe1one~! voted to
I
Qatar a ~.o1a1on on Aocepting the developer'o engineering design to
j
,
open up Vistawilla Road. The opening would give aoceaa to through
t~att'io', frOlll 1434(419) to NOl'thol'n Wa,., and then on through the rut
ot TUso o.W1119..)
,
Originally, t~e P.U.D. ealled tor both TUsQora Or1ve and Vistawtlla
I
ROad to be opened in the fiture to offer aoce.. to a po..1ble 2000
I
apartments, Var10us QQmmereial cOncerns (Qa=mero1al is not def1nod),
I
and other unknown.. or COur8B, that ~ake8 sense. Prope~ty ~hich 1&
a part of our !pre$t1s10U1 o~unity ia oe~tainly worth more than
property that oaa no d1reot looeSB.
In oettling tJe "law.ult" oon.el'ning the oOlllmeroial lIrea in the ho/U't
or Tu.o owill a,l OUr a clllllli ..ionol'o "irtl1all:r g a"o aw..,. tho 0 toro ,
Untll that tuJo tho BOard .oo.,od to bo in ogreoment that the two roo.ci.
I ,
should not go jthrOugh. But they allow~d the developer to ad~ "Item D"
to the final ag~ee~ent, with the threat that it be inoluded or there
I
. woulel be no aajtthllltlnt. Ham D saya that the C-odoners would agree
to open the tw.o roads when the Develope~ wanted. Now the Commissioners
. I
roel that thOle i. nO ot~er ohoioe. I beg to disagres. C~o Januar,. 1,
1991, th$re will be a new Borud. With a d1trerent lawyer, a dirferent
Judge (0.. Arbi!tr dol' ) , and .. d1t'teren t po:ln t or' at t aok . "hy 0 an 't wo
appeal th1& P,,~v10u. &grDoment? A4d guoo. what? We now real1.. th..t
the DevelOper ~OUld h..ve ~e~ly oared leao abo~t the originall:r planned
cOJmuO%'oiaJ. are1a in the he:u-t of TUBoawilla. He vary adrOitly used. it
I .
aa a lever to get what h. r8ally wanted all 4longJ To open up ~l the
I
area beyond the railroad traoka to development with two AC0083 roads
I. "_"
into oW' bedroO:Zl oommunit1.
I
We need to oen~ a meoe..ge to the W1nter Springe Commi&aionere. En o ugh l
EnoUgh giVing thia ~v.lope~ eve~ything he wanta. He'a in buaineaa to
' .
make monet, an~ he'l vs~7 gOOd at it. Eve~y ~eo1!1on that he ha~ mQde
I ..
regar~ing tho development at' Tuscawl11a h..s been b....d on the oaHam line _
I
p~ofit. He will be lea"ing .oon, and WAnte to wring every laat pooe1ile
.ent o~t or thr propo~t,. he h....'l.i'~:
Our C~i8s1ont~8 ~U8t oontinue to 4.te~. to
take, in o~~e~~to protoct itl oonat1tuenta.
I
,
e
I
. 11 : 3C:; FRor.,.t
. DEC-ll..--1990 _
BF:OAD CASSEL r'lTL
TO
EAt: 11 ':.,:. F' . 02
, ....C.-...t::'-~~ l~i 4~~f"i ;
";:>73t;;oel421<;;-;.
41e7 (;,02) Oe47;1:; 2
table, to do what~ver it
Open up that oan c~ wormsl
\:0. d .~t:HOl
.
.
,.
I
I
e I
Don't bo intimidatod br threats from the Devoloper and his.paid ex.
porea. There rl e always alternativ8a. Nothing is such that it oan't
be ohangod.
Opening up o1t,er ~uloora D~1ve or V1etawilla Road goes against the
inhBrent oharaQt8~ of our neighborhood. it goeD against tho wi~he. ot
the ~oople WhO\11ve thore, and it gQe~ against what is moral11 right
for the rami11I~ ot Tuaoawilla.
Call your Comm IBione~'. Call today, out please call before it's too
late. The Win~er Springs City commissioners Are:
I
P~11 Kulces (Mayor) 6q9~4730
I
TTri Donnelly 327-0$97
Don JonaB 366-1760
I
Cind1 Kaehler 699-4076
Jbhn Langellptti 36S.~,Sl
4t Ptul partyka 365-9233
I
I
t
1
I
I
i
!-
I
l
i
I
Let them know hat you want the Develope~ ~topped,'evon it 1t means a
lawau1t. Tie he Devoloper's hanas. If 1QU care about the oatety ot
your t~ille8, if you eare about ino~ea!cd noise, litter. and pollution,
If 1Qu,aare abrut the increaoe in orime and vanQali~ that will aure~y
ocme. if you oare about falling property values. Call Nowl Please.
I
Thank you ror TOur t~~ effort and con8id~~at1on in thia ~att.r. I
love living inlTuseawilla. I'd hate to see our lir~style radically
ohanged for the worse.
I
I
,
. I
P. S. Any ideas. plan! etc..'fO~ alte~native8, should b~ 8ubmittoQ
1
in writing to the Board ~etore Deoemoer 31. 1990. A wo~k$ho~ will ~e
I .
held on January 7. 1991 to go over all viable options or alternativcl.
I
etc.. Viatawilla Road design will ce back before the Board at the
_^. . i , ~
HapPY' Holidays.
I~~
Peggy Baker
~~_~ _J_~~ ~. ~~ ~~~A~~.~in~ one to attond.
.
e
.
CITY OF OVIEDO FLORIDA
400 ALEXANDRIA BOULEVARD. OVIEDO. FLORIDA 32765 · (407) 366-7000
~~~~.'~~IT\ll'~~~. ~.n.. ..
' ~_..... t:! ''-- I ~ 11
" ,'.1 'i I::
. '-J ~
,;
DE C:1 1990
v. EUGENE WilLIFORD. III
CITY MANAGER
November 30, 1990
CITY OF WilHER SP~INGS
CITY HALL
The Honorable Philip Kulbes
Mayor, city of Winter Springs
1126 E. S. R. 434
Winter Springs, FL 32708
Re: Proposed Planning Study for S.R. 434/
Expressway Interchange Area
Dear Mayor Kulbes:
The City of Oviedo and Seminole County have each committed $15,000 to
fund a joint planning study of the proposed S.R. 434/Expressway
Interchange area. This future interchange will significantly impact
land use and traffic patterns in the City of Winter Springs,
unincorporated Seminole County, and the City of Oviedo. I believe that
a specific study of the area and analysis of potential land uses could
benefit all of our jurisdiction equally.
Certainly, if we can jointly adopt a specific land use plan for the
impact area we can accommodate, support, and protect our various
concerns and interests. We are therefore asking the City of Winter
Springs to also participate in the planning effort and commit an equal
$15,000.
The City of Oviedo will be pleased to coordinate and administer the
$45,000 study, but all jurisdictions will jointly review and approve the
scope of services and all work products.
We have a unique opportunity to
truly benefit all our citizens.
there is the potential that
ineffecti ve.
make intergovernmental coordination
Without a united plan for this area,
our individual plans will become
.
e
.
Mayor Philip Kulbes
November 30, 1990
Page 2 -
Thank you for your consideration and we look forward to a prompt
response. Please feel free to call if you have any questions or need
additional information.
Sincerely,
CITY OF OVIEDO
~~M
V. Eugene Williford, I
City Manager
C: Tony Vanderworp
Oviedo City Council
Commissioner Pat Warren
ce-~
~.1f."&-16r>-
~
?~_L
.
e
.
...
ADVANTAGES OF S.R. 434/EXPRESSWAY INTERCHANGE STUDY
1 )
The interchange area includes land within the City llmit~ of Winter
Springs, the City of Oviedo, and unincorporated Seminole County.
The Expressway is ,) Coun ty bcili ty and S. R. 4~~1 is a state
facility.
Historically, expres~way interchanges have generated a wide range
of impacts and developmrnt pressurrs nn surroundinq bnd lwes.
Because ~)o llIany illri~)niction~j are involved, it" is criticJI to have
common goals, objectives ann policie~) for this area. All
jurisdictions would share equally in developing a scope of
services, and also in reviewing and approving work products. The
Consultant will be incorporating Winter Springs' plans - no one
intends to tell your City what you can and cannot do. We simply
want to evaluate the area as a whole, and support and maintain
designated land uses in each jurisdiction.
If we can agree on land uses, required improvements, necessary
services, and jurisdictional boundaries, we will all benefit.
2)
If we have a common plan \~e will be in a better bargaining position
with FOOT for the nature and timing of improvements to S.R. 414.
3) The City of Oviedo and Seminole County will be doing a plan for the
area within their jurisdictions whether or not the City of Winter
Springs participates. It seems that it would he in the bc~~:t
interest ot Winter Spring to be an equal partner in the study. Thc'
land uses and dcvc'lopment stJndard~j in Oviedo and Seminole County
will also impact Winter Springs.
4) If you cannot commit funds this year, we Ci1n phase the :1tudy ~o
that Winter Springs' contribution can be included in the '91-'92
budget. With a commitment now that the funds will be included in
your next year's budget, we can start the study i~nediately and
then span the fiscal year for completion.
5) The City of Oviedo has taken the lead in this project because we
have a transportation planning firm (G]atting, Lopez, Kercher &
Anglin) under a continuing services contract. By agreeing to use
our consultant, we will save the expense of advertisement
selection.
6) The study will include a plan for financing necessary improvements.
A tax increment financing district or Municipal Service Taxing Unit
will be more effective if it is done as soon as possible and at one
time. The County will also be more cooperative jf they have been
involved in its development.
.
e
.
-
S.R. 434/EXPRESSWAY INTERCHANGE STUDY
December 10, 1990
7) A jointly funded plan will be less expensive than if we each do our
own individual plans.
8) If we have a unified plan, then all properties and developers will
share equally in funding necessary improvements through one or more
tax increnlent financing districts or MSTU's.
DLK/mw