Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989 11 13 Regular . . . ------~ November 8, 1989 TO: City Manager ~ Land Development Coordinato~ FROM: RE: Agenda Item, Chestnut Ridge This project is located at the intersection of Northern Way and Greenbriar Lane. Two variances were granted this project before Staff reviewed the project. The first was to locate an entrance intersection less than 800 feet from a major inter- section and the second was to allow the two retention/detention ponds located on the golf course have wet bottoms. These Board of Adjustment minutes are attached. The Staff Review was held on October 10, 1989. Department Head comments are attached. It is to be noted that the comments made by the Department Heads are to be addressed on Final Engineering. The P & Z Board recommended approval at their meeting of October 18, 1989 as re- flected in the attached minutes. The Commission action is to approve or disapprove the Final Development Plan/pre- liminary Engineering. DRL/gh cc: Mayor Commission City Attorney City Clerk . PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MINUTES October 18, 1989 The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. BOARD MEMBERS: David Hopkins, Vice-Chairman, Present Gene Dorman, Chairman, Present John Torcaso, Present David McLeod, Present Joseph Ehardt, Present CITY OFFICIALS: J. Koch, Dir.Adm./Comp. Plarming D. LeBlanc, Land Dev. Coordinator L. Kozlov, Ci ty Engineer Attorney Clay Parker Torcaso asked that the approval of the minutes be postponed until the end of the meeting. All Board members agreed. Chestnut Ridqe - Final Development Plan/Preliminary Enqineerinq (Tuscawilla): LeBlanc gave his presentation. He stated that the Board has received the packet wi th Staff comments. The developer is present to answer any questions. Dorman asked that someone representing the developer explain the plan more so the residents present can become better acquainted with the development. Jim Willard, from SWann & Haddock, present on behalf of Pioneer Savings Bank, spoke on the developnent. . Willard stated that this property is part of the Tuscawilla PUD. This property was subject to litigation between the prior owner and the City of Winter Springs. The bank took the property back in July 1987. In May of 1988 the property was redesigned to a 55 lot suJ:xlivision. Willard stated that they have been working with the City Staff for over a year on the layout and he stated that the Staff comments will be addressed in the final engineering. Ehardt asked about the Building Official's comments regarding the consistency of the setbacks. LeBlanc stated that the developers are aware of the Building Official's comments and these will be addressed in final engineering. Dorman stated that this is not an advertised public hearing but there are several residents in the audience and that he feels it would be appropriate that the residents be given the opportunity to ask questions or make comments. He said the Board will hold off their questions until after the residents have a chance to speak. Richard Conniff, Alan Lindell, and Earl Roberts spoke on the request. There were questions on the fence surrounding the property, questions on the retention ponds, and the maintenance of these ponds, and the depth of the ponds . . Wes Blount, representing the developer, stated that the wall along Northern Way will be brick and the wall along Greenbriar Lane will be block. Steve Sanders, retention ponds. part owner of the Tuscawilla Country Club, spoke on the He stated that the retention ponds will not affect the ---.---.-..-.. - b . Planning and Zoning Board Minutes Regular Meeting October 18, 1989 Page 2 drainage on the golf course; he stated that the POnds will improve the drainage. Willard stated that the IIp--keep of the P<>nds will be the l'eSP<>nsibility of the Country Club. The City will have recourse if these P<>nds are not properly maintained. Blount stated that the P<>nds will be fran a depth of 3 feet to a maximum of 6 feet. The P<>nds will have a slight slope of 5 to 1 for safety PUl'poses, McLeod asked about the drainage. Blount stated that the runoff will be into a CUlvert. Blount also stated that the pipe is perforated to all"", filtration. McLeod asked about the setbacks. LeBlanc stated that there are no set setbacks in the POD. The developers check wi th the Arch! tectural Review Board for the setbacks, except where there are utili ty easements. . Eharctt asked if the setbacks will be consistent. Blount stated that the setbacks will be standardized ani sIn.n on the plat at the final engineering. Hol'kins asked about the golf cart drive being close to the retention P<>nds. Willard stated that the golf cart paths will be 1IlOVed. Hopkins asked about the covenants. submitted to the City for review. Willard stated that they have been Hopkins asked if there will be any proPOSed recreation area. Willard stated that there is not any proposed recreation area. TorCaso asked if the P<>nds Would detract fran the valUe of the homes in the area. Willard stated that they hope that the "PPosite will happen, they feel that the POnds will be an enhancement. Torcaso stated that the Board of Adjustment granted Tho variances ani they had checked into these and felt the variances ""'re satisfactory. He stated that he feels that the c<>mnents by Ci ty Staff should have been satisfied before coming to this Board. Dorman react from the Code book Section 20-3 - Purpose, and Section 20-5- Interpretation, purpose and conflict. Mel Seemoore, develoPnent consultant, answered questions on lots. . Dorman questioned the variances granted by the Board of Adjustment with the placement of the interSection. . . . Planning and Zoning Board Regular Meeting October 18, 1989 Page 3 Ken Steeves, representing the developer for the Board of Adjustment meeting on the variances, stated the reasons the variances were requested. Dorman asked about the five foot landscape easement. Blount stated that it is alongside the right-of-way to accommodate the screen walls. Attorney Parker read Section 20-381 of the City Code in regard to the Chairman's concern about the contractual agreement between the developer and the golf course. Attorney Parker reiterated that the Board at this stage can either recollUnend approval, approval with modifications, or disapproval; this is the scope of the review at this time. Section 5-20-3 states this and a public hearing is not correct at this time. Willard stated that the developer will address the Staff's concerns and these will be resolved before the final plat is recorded. Dorman stated his concern that having the retention ponds on the golf course property will be setting a precedent. Koch stated that this is not setting a precedent; there are other developments that have off-site retention. Hopkins asked about the clearing of trees. Ordinance will be enforced. LeBlanc stated that the Arbor There was discussion on the request. Ehardt moved to recollUnend approval of the Chestnut Ridge final development plan/preliminary engineering based on the condition that as many as possible of the Staff conunents be incorporated into the final engineering drawings. Seconded by Hopkins. Vote: Torcaso: aye; McLeod: aye; Ehardt: aye; Hopkins : aye; Dorman: nay. Motion carried. . . . October 12, 1989 TO: P & Z Board ~ FROM: Land Development Coordinator~ RE: Chestnut Ridge - Final Development Plan/Preliminary Engineering The Staff Review was held on October 10, 1989. Attached are the departmental comments. Also attached are the minutes of the Board of Adjustment granting two (2) variances to the project. DRL/gh cc: City Manager . October 11,1989 -- - - TO: City Manager ~ Land Development Coordinato~ ~ FROM: RE: Staff Review, Chestnut Ridge Final Development Plan/Preliminary Engineering The above referenced was held on October 10, 1989. J. Sikes, and K. Smalley represented the project. HOlzman, Koch, Kozlov, LeBlanc and Taylor. Archer their comment letters were read into the minutes. w. Blount, J. Russell, M. Seymour, Staff members present were Govoruhk, and Artman were in court, but Attached are .departmental comments. . This project will be presented to the Planning and Zoning Board on October 18, 1989. .... -= DRL/gh cc: Staff . - - - . MEMO: 10/6/89 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR BUILDING OFFICIAL ~ CHESTNUT RIDGE COMMENTS 1. Furnish street lighting plan as determined by FL Power Corp. 2. They are not consistent in setbacks. Lots 18, 19, 20, 34, 36, 37 and 38 have 20 ft. front setbacks--other lots show 25 ft. Some lots show 6 ft. side setbacks and others show 7-1/2 ft. This is very confusing. . 3. Lot 24 would only allow a very small house. 4. Lot 36 would only allow a very narrow house. 5. I do not consider Lot 35 as buildable due to drainage easement with chain link fence projecting into the front yard. 6. Lot 34 is only buildable on rear of lot due to drainage easement thru the middle. . i ~ 7. Need to show pad elevations for each lot. ! ! i I . ~ ~ !!- ~ .- !!!5 iii - !!!!!! -- Ii . - -- - - - .. II!!!!I! i III, . . . PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT To: Land Developer CoordInator G. E. Ar tman e:ff (z; From: Date: OctOber 9, 1989 '::;;ub]ect: Chestnut Ridge SubdIvisIon ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- PublIC Works will of course Install all traffIC and stre:t regulatory sIgns. Cost of materIals to be r9imbursed [0 tn9 City by the Developer. A subdivlslon Arbor InspectIon must be perrc1[med prien. land clearinq. i to any ; Fire hydrants will be painted in accordance with City standard. An additIonal Arbor InspectIon must be done on each 1r:.1t as II 18 developed. ~ ~ -== - -= . . . WINTER SPRINGS WATER & SEWER 1 N. FAIRFAX AVENUE WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708 Telephone (305) 327-1641 October 10, 1989 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Land Development Coordinator Doug Taylor RE: Water and Sewer for Chestnut Ridge The preliminary plans for Chestnut Ridge appear to meet the standards for Winter Springs Water & Sewer. Before final approval, I will need profiles on the sewer lines and a detail sheet on the water distribution materials, valves, and thrust blocking, etc. DT/bl - ~ ~ ~ ... I jj ~ '.. Gi iiiIi II!!! October 3, 1989 . TO: LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR FROM, FIRE CHI~ SUBJECT: CHESTNUT RIDGE The fifth revision of the Chestnut Ridge Pre- liminary Engineering/Final Development Plan appears to meet fire department interests regarding spacing and placement of fire hydrants. The developer should be advised that any damage or lack of water service to any hydrant during the construction phase of the development could jeopardize the safety of in- habitants. . . ~,,"'~lI!!l!'~"'I'~i'! . . . ii!~~-tt'Il'I' WIN T E R S P R I N G S -- ----- . TO: FROM: DATE: REF: POL ICE D E PAR T MEN T DON LEBLANC, LAND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR John Govoruhk, Chief of Police October 10, 1989 CHESTNUT RIDGE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING/FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 36-89 A reveiw of Chestnut Ridge plans appear to meet department requirements. The following is a reminder of previous requirements: . JG/eds . 1 . ARROWS WILL BE STOP BARS ETC. THERMOPLASTIC 2. STREET NAMES SUBMITTED TO 9-1-1 FOR APPROVAL 14///"1 . a//''/ / /./ ....'\~ r/<;// ihn/&:~~'&:'" ..---' / / th-i-ef-Of Police THE BAD G E 0 F PUB L I C F A I T H, S A F E T Y AND T R U S T II .. - - '" iiii :: :: ;;;; - = " iii I ~ !: ~ ;; - II . II II ii!; :: iii - G ~ --- = --- == ~ - """" ~ E ~ ~ . II ...------- .. October 10, 1989 TO: Land Development Coordinator SUBJECT: Chestnut Ridge The final development plan/preliminary engineering satisfactorily addresses most of the planning matters raised at the prior meetings with the developer: A second access to the development has been added on Greenbriar Lane in line with the road into the Greenbriar development on the west side of this collector road. All lots with rear boundaries on collector roads will be precluded from direct access to those roads legally by dedication of access rights to the City on the plat and physically by walls along these roads. There will be a 5 foot landscaped easement and a wood fence along the common ~ boundary of Chestnut Ridge and Fairway Oaks. In addition to these, the final engineering plans should include: Information on landscaping within the right-of-way along the perimeter walls and at the entrances. Clarification of the responsibility for Tract F outside this development on the northeast corner of Northern Way and Greenbriar Lane. Documentation of the offsite easement to connect the stormdrain from Lot 34 into the Fairway Oaks drainage system. Offsite easements and maintenance provisions for retention ponds 1 and 2 on Golf Course property. Verification that the proposed rear setback of lots along the Golf Course are vaild. All of the above need to be submitted with the final engineering. ~ Jacqueline Koch Dir. Adm./Comprehensive Planning x -~ ------ ........"'...--- .->....,.,.---- .~- - ."---..- October 11, 1989 TO: Land Development Coordinator , SUBJECT: Preliminary Engineering FROM: City Engineer The preliminary engineering for the project "Chestnut Ridge" was found to be satisfactory. . LTK/gh . ..~ ,- --------~....,....- .~.-------- '-- .y" Board of Adjustment Minutes April 6, 1989 Page 2 Greene asked about how many signs are allcwed. LeBlanc stated the applicant is asking for t~ signs. One to face 17-92 and one to face 419. Reid asked about the house on the property. Lockridge stated that the house will be taken out. Greene asked if there was anyone present to speak for or against the request. There was no one present to speak for or against the request. Reid asked about landscaping. Hartman stated that there will be bushes and trees along the side and back of the property. He also stated there are some trees on the property but because there is a four foot elevation difference , they may not be able to save the trees, if this is the case, they will replace then. '. LeBlanc stated that the landscaping will be addressed at the Site Plan Review. Reid moved to approve the request, limited to the two signs requested, and not to exceed any existing County ordinances and rules and subject to any future changes on those rules with the other signs in the area. Seconded by Nystran. DisCQssion. Vote: All aye. Motion carried. Request of American Pioneer Savings Bank for a Variance to Section 14-122 (ell of the Code (as stated in paragra~l 11 of Ordinance No. 444), to Allow Two (2) Wet-Bottom Ponds to Serve as Retention/Detention Ponds. The Ponds Will De Located on the l'uscawilla Country Club Golf Course and Will Serve as Water J:~-'-?-9:1.:.~ for l!91~_~_1~~'D9.-!.~'lJle Pr~r:.!YJs ~J)ed _V~"lI~:,ll.!@(LQni,:LDe~~~p--'.'!~_Il~:. LeBlanc gave his presentation. He stated that the Board has received the documents pertaining to this request. He also stated that he was requested by the Chainnan of the Board to checl<: wi th the City Engineer as to why these ch...-=mged to dry bottom ponds. LeJ3lanc stated that the City Engineer stated that it is possible, in the future, that the City will be IlklI1dated to take over the stonflW;:lter management system. It is much better mainteIklI1ce for a dry bottom pond. There has been some problems wi th ~t-bottom ponds in Oak Forest. LeBlanc also stated that the City Engineer saiCl that these ponds in question will be maintained by the Golf Course, the City Engineer has no problems with having these ponds be wet-botton, but the City Epgineer would have the final say as to the spacing of the ponds and the property lines. . LeBlanc stated that Mr. Seemore and Mr. Blunt are present to speclk for the request. Greene stated that the Board has received a copy of a 1etter-of-agreenent betv.een American Pioneer and the Country Club agreeing to do this and after the letter of agreement the City has }Jc;"lSsed a rule to allow only dry-bottom drainage areas. Therefore, the developer has started in action and the City has ch--:mged the rule, they are asking that they are allo~ to continue their action to construct l'.et-bottom ponds. ~--_. ......-..................' -~ .~ "'--'" ---- ~-_.,... ..--- . Board of Adjustment Minutes April 6, 1989 Page 3 . Blunt stated that the ponds ~uld be. located between holes 15 and 16. The ponds will be built as far away fran the property lines as possible, and will be heavily landscaPed. Greene asked about the depth of the ponds. Blunt stated that they will be six feet in depth. Blunt also stated that the closest point from the property lines will be fifty feet. The ponds are strictly for stormwater. Greene stated that if the slope is steeper than 4 to 1 then the ponds need to be fenced. Blunt stated that this land is a permanent easement covering the two ponds and the drainage across. It will be a natural amenity. . Greene asked if there was anyone present to speak. for or against the request. Richard Connif spoke on the request. Donnelly moved to approve the request. Seconded by Reid. Vote: All aye. Motion carried. The meeting adjourned at 7:40 P.M. Respectfully SUbmitted, ~ %;$~ Margo ~pkjns, Recording Secretary Board of Adjustment , ... . ~ ---~ .....- __ 0- '"--,' , BOARD OF ADJUS'IMENT MINUrES August 18, 1988 I j I 1 I BOARD MEMBERS: James Greene, Chairman, Absent Harry Reid, Vice-chairman, Present Terri Donnelly, Present Richard Kessler, Absent Nick Bozic, Present CITY OFFICIAL: D. LeBlanc, Land Dev. Coordinator !\pproval of Amended Minutes of June 2 , 1988: The Board agreed to defer the approval of the amended minutes until the next meeting as only two members of the Board are present from the meeting of June 2, 1988. Approval of Minutes of August 4, 1988: The Board agreed to defer the approval of the minutes until the next meeting as only two members of the Board are present from the meeting of August 4, 1988. . ; Request of American Pioneer Savings Bank for a Variance to Section 14.93 (b) to Lo<?fte an Entrance Intersection Less TI1an 800 feet From a M3.jor Street, Namely, _670- East of Greenbriar Lane Alonq Northern Way in the Tuscawilla SUb1ivision: LeBlanc gave his presentation. He stated that the developer is asking for a variance of Section 14.93 (b) of the City Code which states that an intersection is to be located at lease 800 feet from a major street. He stated that the developer is asking for a variance to locate the intersection approximately 670 feet from mid Greenbriar Lane. He also stated that the developer has stated that if they do not get the variance, they are prepared to move the street to the required 800 feet. Reid asked if the City has made a study to see if this would make a difference from 800 feet to 670 feet. LeBlanc state no, that the developer wanted to put the road at 670 feet, and the Staff had alerted the developer of the Code requir ing 800 feet. Reid asked if there was anyone present to speak for or against the request. John Gupton asked why this request has not- gone to the Planning and Zoning Board. LeBlanc stated that the developer is finalizing their plans and for cost consideration':> that they wanted to know what could be done before they submitted the final engineering plans. ~ . t Gupton also stated that this would create more traffic on Northern Way and he stated that it would seem JOOre natural for the road to be built off Greenbriar Lane. Joe Gleason also spoke on the request. He stated that as the entrance is on the proposed plans, the headlights of the cars exiting would be directly on the homes across the street. --~ "-p' . Board of Adjustment Minutes August 18, 1988 Page 2 Ken Steeves, Land Planner, representing the developer, spoke for the request, He stated that there are several reasons for the request. One was the developer felt that having the road where it is planned that it would make for better circulation of the subdivision as it is closer to the middle of the project, He also stated that if the developer rroved the entrance to the required 800 feet that there is a canal which runs through the property and there are large trees in the area which would have to cane down and the canal would need to be filled and piped across the road. He stated that the area would loose the scenic value it has. Reid asked if the developer has considered the entrance on Greenbriar, Steeves stated that marketing wise the developer felt it would not give them the exposure they would like, Steeves stated that with the 50-54 homes that are proposed that the traffic would not make a significant change. . Bozic moved to recamnend approval as stated giving the variance for not less than 670 feet. Seconded by Reid with conditions. The condition being that the road be adjusted between homes so lights would not shine on the homes and to leave the creek and vegetation surrounding it and to also look into the POSsibili ty of the road on Greenbriar Lane. Steeves stated that he would mention the possibility of moving the street to Greenbriar Lane as was mentioned, for privacy and security reasons to the developer. Vote: All aye. Motion carried. Respectfully Submitted, ~jb~~) Margo Hopkins, Recording Secretary l3oartl. of Adjustment ", . . . . . ~ November 8, 1989 TO: City Manager Land Development coordinato~ FROM: RE: Agenda Item, Parcel 51 The project is located on Winter Springs Boulevard to the immediate west of the Country Club. This was before the Commission on June 12, 1989 and was denied because the applicant was requesting two waivers. The revised plan has now been resubmitted without a request for waivers. The City Engineer has reviewed the revised plan and finds that it is satisfactory. Attached are the City Engineer's letter and the Commission Minutes of June 12, 1989. The Commission action is to approve or disapprove the Final Development Plan/Pre- liminary Engineering. DRL/gh cc: Mayor Commission City Attorney City Clerk . . . . . November 6, 1989 TO: Land Develo:pment Coordinator FRaIl: City Engineer i~ SUBJECT: Tuscawilla Parcel 51 - Preliminary Engineering The revised final engineering received on November 2, 1989, satisfies the requirements of 30 ft. right-of-way and the 50 ft. clubhouse separation from the water's edge of the retention/detention pond. /mh cc: Ci ty Manager Building Department .. .-- . 88-89-20 REGULAR MEETING CITY COMMISSION CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS JUNE 12, 1989 The Regular Meeting of the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, was called to order by Mayor Leanne M. Grove at 7:30 p. m. Roll Call: Mayor Leanne M. Grove, present Deputy Mayor Philip A. Kulbes, present City Manager Ricahrd Rozansky, present City Attorney Frank Kruppenbacher, present Commissioners: Cindy Kaehler, present Arthur Hoffmann, present William A. Jacobs, present Paul P. Partyka, present For the invocation Commissioner Partyka asked for a moment of silent prayer. The pledge of allegiance to the flag was led by Deputy Mayor Philip A. Kulbes. Motion was made by Commissioner Kulbes for approval of the minutes of May 22, 1989. Seconded by Commissioner Partyka. Discussion. Vote on the motion: Commissioner Kulbes, aye; Commissioner Jacobs, aye; Commissioner Partyka, aye; Commissioner Kaehler, aye; Commissioner Hoffmann, aye; motion carr~ed. Public Comment: Kathryn Carls, Hacienda Village, spoke about a citation she received. As this is a civil matter no action could be taken. . Cindy Gennell, Wildwood, announced that with a $5.00 membership to the Civic Association you would also get a .Winter Springs license plate. James Meade, spoke in reference to Item A, on the Agenda. He asked to withdraw his request to annex at this time. General Agenda: First Reading of Ord. No. 462, amending the Compo Plan, (Lots 1 and 2 and that part of Lots 3 and 4 east of Tuscawilla Road and 1/2 of vacated street on south, Tuskawi.lla, PB 1, PG 5, PR of Sem. Co., FL): Motion was made by Commissioner Kulbes to read Ord. No. 462 by title only on first reading. Seconded by Commissioner Hoffmann. Discussion. Vote on the motion: Commissioner Jacobs, aye; Commissioner Partyka, aye; Commissioner Kaehler, aye; Commissioner Hoffmann, aye; Commissioner Kulbes, aye; motion carried. Attorney Kruppenbacher read Ord. No. 462 by title only on first reading. Parcel 51-Commission action on Preliminary Engineering/Final Development Plan: This item was tabled at the last meeting because the applicant was not present. The applicant was present this evening. Land Development Coordinator, Don LeBlanc, said two waivers are being sought. One is to allow the club house to be possibly less than 50 feet from a body of water and secondly, the road is 20 feet paved and the Code calls [or a 30 foot right of way, (Section 9-296). Discussion followed. . Motion was made by Commissioner Kaehler [or the denial of the preliminary engineering and final development plan for Parcel 51. Seconded by Commissioner Partyka. Discussion. Vote on the motion: Commissioner Partyka, aye; Commissioner Kaehler, aye; Commissioner Hoffmann, aye; Commissioner Kulbes, aye; Commissioner Jacobs, aye; motion carried. I . . . ~ November 8, 1989 TO: City Manager ~ Land Development Coordinator FROM: RE: Agenda Item, Resolution 624 This is a request oE Land Engineering Company, on behalf of Mindich Construction, Inc., to vacate 1, feet of a drainage easement located at 320 Dornoch Court, Lot 100 of Highland Village Two. Please see attached Land Engineering Company letter dated October 31, 1989, City Engineer memo dated October 31, 1989 and plats depicting present easement and future easement. DRL/gh cc: Mayor Commission City Attorney City Clerk . c2and 0ngineering @ompany @on.lultinfl c8nflineerl 2 anJ ef urvellorl 848 COUNTY ROAD 427 SOUTH LONGWOOD, FLORIDA 32750 Tel. 407/831.3633 October. 31, 1989 City Commissioners City of Winter Springs 1126 S.R. 434 vJinter Springs, Fl. 32708 Re: Highland Village Dear Commissioners: This letter is to request a partial abandonment of a15' drainage easement in Highland Village Subdivision on lot 100. The house was inadvertently constructed 1.11 into the drainage easement. Our request is for a 1.5 foot abandonment of the easement on lot 100. . Enclosed herewith is a drawing and legal description of the 1.5' to be abandoned and a check for $256.00. We respectfully request approval of this abandonment. ~7/ 4?tk ~Lilld~ ALL/ dh . .. October 31, 1989 TO: Land DevelOpm:~(?O~ City Engineer ^ y Highland Village II, Drainage Easement Vacation, Lot 100 FROM: SUBJECT: Attached are copies of a proposed vacation of 1.5 feet of a drainage easement on Lot 100 of North Orlando Ranches Section 11. I agree to this adjustment because construction of a house on this lot began invertently on the easement. ~ Attachments /mh cc: City Manager Public Works Director Building Department ~ . PLAT OF BOUNDARY SURVI;:Y for: ,OESCRIPTION: MINDICH HOMES LOT 100 HIGHLAND VILLAGE TWO RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 40 PAGE(S) 40 B 41 PUBLIC RECORDS OF'SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA. FLOOD CERTIFICATION: HE PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON :S IN ZONE "c" ACCORDING TO E NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 120295 0005C. . 30.00' NORTH ORL A NDO _ RANcCHES / SEC. II P."r:r.-13, PGJ.22 a 23 '''. I ...., .... I." I "'. -.....:........ ""';.- / r.:~' t... :..... ;.... i...... .'0 ': "" \.; /:' ",: ....... .... S 20030'37 liE - 45.0....0' ." ~ . s ~ c.ql. "',' ' ~. I"~ ~ <0' LEGEND 100 G - J.P. WITH CAP NO. IIII o - L P. WITH CAP NO. E.O. 096 61 - REBAR NO. LO' 2100 141 - I.P. Wlnl CAP NO. 2005 111 - CONC. MON. NO. 200:i 6A"7' U) o " ~ 0 \: 0 V\ ... U) l~ 0 o o ;. '0, I"'~ ....: ..... .... ..... f-'- l. \fl 'w ! ()1 o <( o 0:: w .. rr> N Q) N " Q) w z W II Ii1 N -0) N " Q) z tr. o P) t,; cJ~; f[\V1~:: ill'~. \ f. ~l Y . -"' ~''''''''''' 'li ~ I I ~ l~ ~'-" OCT 2 G 1989 ~. ~ ~\ ~~ S2003013711E- 45_001 I I =:!!lr ~ 01 o \() (\l CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS CITY ENGINEER o o III (320 OORNOCH CT) N NOTES: .') SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY. AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. (2) BEARINGS BASED ON RECORD PLAl: S 200 30' 37 II E DORNOCH COURT CERTIFIED TO: (3) ALL DRAINAGE EASEMENTS, UTILITY EASEMENTS. AND OTHER EASEMENlS SUBJECT TO THE RECORDED DECLARATION AND RESTRICTlON~ OF RECORD. I II DARNCTT DANK Of CENTHAL FLumDA, N.A. I Z 1 COMMONWEALTH LAND a TITLE CO. I 31 WINDE;RWEI.:DLC. llAINES, WARD 0 WOODMAN. J~A. E HEREOY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY SHOWN HEREON. S CORRECT TO THE OEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE AND MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF LAND SURVEYORS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027 F. S. SCALE. I" = 20' UPDATE: FINAL: FOUNDATION: BOUNDARY: LE89-272S OCT. 4. 1900 LAND ENGINEERING CO. L.B. 5090 LAND ENGINEERING CO. 848 COUNTY ROAD 427 SOUTH LONGWOOD, FLORIDA 32750 - 5499 By: J. Howard Oliver Florida Professional Land Surveyor No. IIII NOT VALID UNLESS EMBOSSED WITH SURVEYORS SEAL TELEPHONE: (407) 83/ - 3633 . PL:AT OF BOUNDARY SURVEY for: DESCRIPTION: MINDICH HOMES LOT 100 HIGHLAND VILLAGE TWO RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 40 PAGE(S) 40 8 41 PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEM I NOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA. ~ . Sc ~. 4t.€': I~. ~ ~ <0' NORTH ORLANDO RANCHES /SEC. 1/ p.8-:- 13, PGS. 22 8< 23 E~. L.. C C 1< 1~) " '--- ,:~} / / :' .., " .... S 20030'37"E - 45.00' ." " I ~ (~ ~ m I ',0 r . I '"' I I I~ 1"1 Q I~ ,<:I I~ I~ I I. I~ I III I ,') <1 I z I. 4 I IY I 0 I -~ I' <D.!>r; L I. I I -7',-----1 ,/0' C/,T/(.,rY (;.'';j".f F'- . I 15'.ltO' LEGEND roo o - I.P. WITH CAP NO. III1 o - I.p. WITH CAP NO. E.O. 090 Gl - REBAR NO. LO'2100 o - I.P. WITH CAP NO. 2005 m - CONC. MON. NO. 200~ , 6.47 - o o If) o ::..:': (::: .... ..... FLOOD CERTIFICATION: THE PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON LIES IN ZONE "C"ACCORDING TO THE NATIONAL FLOOO INSURANCE RATE MAP COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 120295 0005C. . .30.00' W :z r() {\J (J) {\J o (J) U> Z o <t o 0:: (E'--" TI~ 'n'~'~ r). ~-,''J. I r.". ,\. '\1 '.1' ~"".'rr..'~ ." ~//..~ 1r. ")- I \r/ ..}\ !' lJ ~ :~.:-.. \. .... ""r.... I.' ,.....\ l......~.~ ." ( f.: ", --: ~ '1...,.-' '. .,......"""It I' . '\ t. ..., ....... i,~ .., i 11. "~., OCT 2 6 1989 (X: o c:> uJ ~ ~ S 200 :3 0' 37 II E - 45_00 I o o If\ (320 OORNOCH CT.) l\l CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS CITY ENGINEER (,) 0- ~ ~;~~ \\.Cf.. S 20030'3711E DORNOCH COURT NOTES: (I) SUBJECT TO ALL EASEMENTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY, AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. (2) DEARINGS BASED ON RECORD PLAT. CERTIFIED TO: ~ "2C ~o l~ j:.f. ,ill <OS v <r' JI o o If) o . .0. . ... . : ~ :.. .0': ~ w . r() {\J (J) (\J o (J) Z I I '0 'lr Q VI 01 o III N (::.) ALL DRAINAGE EASEMENTS, UTILITY EASEMENTS. AND OTHER EASEMENTS SUOJECT TO THE RECORDED DECLARATION AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. I I I DARNeTT DANK. OF CENTIlAl. FLOfllDA, N.A. I Z I COMMONWEALTH LAND a TITLE CO. I 3) WINDE;RWC(OLC. IIAINC5, WAnD 0 WOODMAN. I~A, SCALE, I" = 20' WE HEREOY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY SHOWN HEREON, IS CORRECT TO THE OEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE AND MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF LAND SURVEYORS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027 F. S. UPDATE: FINAL: FOUNDATION: BOUNDARY, LE89-272S LAND ENGINEERING CO. L.B.5090 OCT. ". 190a LAND ENGINEERING CO. 848 COUNTY ROAD 427 SOUTH LONGWOOD, FLORIDA 32750 - 5499 By: J. Howard Oliver Florida Professional Land Surveyor No. 1111 NOT VALID UNLESS EMBOSSED WITH SURVEYORS SEAL TELEPHONE: (407) 831 - 3633 DESCRIPTION FOR VACATING PART OF A 7.5 FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT . 'IBAT PART OF UJr 100 OF HIGHLI\ND VILLAGE 'lID lIS R.EX:ORDED IN PlAT EOOK 40 PAGES 40 AND 41 OF TIlE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNl'Y, FWRIDA, BEING DESCRIBED lIS FOI.l.O'i'S: c:cM>1ENCE AT THE SOllrHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID UJr 100 AND RUN N20030'37''W, ALONG 'l'HE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF DORN:X:H COURT, A DISTANCE OF 6.00. FEET TO 'llfE POINI' OF BEGINNING; '.l'HE1>K:E CONl'INUING N20030'37''W, ALONG SAID NOR'IHEASTERLY RIGHT- ,OF-WAY OF DORNOCH COURT, A DISTANCE OF 1.50 FEET; 'IHENCE N69029'23"E, PARALLEL WITH THE SOUl1IEASl'ERLY SIDE OF SAID UJr, 100, A DISTANCE OF 105.00 FEET TO AN- INI'ERSOCTION WITH 'llfE NORTHEASTERLY SIDE OF SAID UJr 100; '.l'HE1>K:E S20030'37''E, ALONG THE SAID NORTHEASTERLY SIDE OF UJr 100, A DISTANCE OF 1.50 FEE'r; THENCE S69029'23"W, PARALLEL WITH 'llfE SOUTHEASTERLY SIDE OF SAID UJr 100, A DISTANCE OF 105.00 FEE:!' TO THE POINI' OF BEGINNING; BEING THE NORTHWESTERLY 1.50 FEET OF 'llfE 7.50 FOOl' DRAINAGE EASEMENr LYING CONI'IGUOUS 'IO THE SOllTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID UJr 100 AND CONTAINING 157.50 SQUARE FEET. F": E~. "--...:.~ ,'" -.. ...~ ., ".. : "'~' ,,: r< :':":.: F~~"r r"~ () F':~ L.. :'~ ~..i C) (:= F~~ :':~\ i....~ c: ~...: r:: :':.~ .:::..:)....::-.::!. / .... .... .... .....- ,I::. "--... ,~. 45.00' ( th l I'~~,IJ ~< 1'-g I~) u) ~",I '0 If!j LO v' -=L-l'~r-- .,~,~ Iii' "'j I~}l' 11:.~ I,~,,~~,'I "t,v. h. :ttj ~ '~f'r ~ I;j:\] '0 l4J ~~ qll) lf~fl ~ ~ ~~i I w; ~ '0 !~I~l4J oll;.:,ll~~ ori *>~, Ol 'q 2~~j ~ ~ I Ift;~I:l:"l: I<J j"", Ul~ : ''j. ~ If) [&"'1 ..~ }~~ g: l~l\.:1 . It '1.: m tl~ z t'\1 11,'::( ~. 1{~.1 1",'k~1 ~i: .",L \~~ ! ,~:-: F3 L.e:: (: i< "--... i:.":" 1'S 20030'37"E (::}(~ ..... ...~~ 100 - o o 10 o ~ 0 (") G1 ::0 {11 G1 w 0 = ::0 fl) (\J -,:) en (\J 0 0 ~ en <.D z ..... ~ ~ ~ u ~ ~ ~ ~ ;;: " :v ~ ~ ~ ~ ..... ..... ~ ~ ~ ~.ll. ~::T::::::. .. S20'30'37"E -1.50' ! (~) ~ "'0.,. "'0 SC.A '"il..~ - o o 10 o U'l W U'l 0 a. 0:: ::> a. Z ...: 0 <( ...J f- a. a. 0:: . 0 u>- 0:: v)w 0 w> U 00:: W ::> 0:: U'l 0:: Z 0<( l.i.. 0 f- U'l0 0 -Z W U'l :I:U'l <! u- a:l f- WO U'l ::.:::Z V)<( (.? Z .. ~~ 0:: U1 <( :I:Z W W f-O a:l f- ~ 0 (\J Z ,,';\ ~ 10 = r...: fl) \~ (\J o en w (/) ~ /O'~T1L1T-; - EASEMENT ~ 'N20030137"W 45.00 " DORNOCH COURT S 20030' 37" E WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DESCRIPTION SHOWN HEREON IS CORRECT TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE AND MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF LAND SURVEYORS. PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027 F. S. OCTOBER 3/~ /989 LE89-294S LAND ENGINEERING CO. L.B. 5090 By: ;:::h / ~Jl~L--.j /O-?/-8;J /~ward Oliver ' V Florida Professional Land Surveyor No. II r I NOT VALID UNLESS EMBOSSED WITH SURVEYORS SEAL LAND ENGINEERING CO. 848 COUNTY ROAD 427 SOUTH LONGWOOD. FLORIDA 32750 - 5499 TELEPHONE: (407) 83/ - 3633 . . . November 8, 1989 TO: City Manager ~ Land Development coordinat~ FROM: RE: Agenda Item K. D. Edelen letter dated October 26, 1989 / Attached is the above referenced for Commission Review. This is on the Agenda under the City Manager's seat. DRL/gh cc: Mayor Commission City Attorney City Clerk . ~~~'- 'IIf[@ OCT 27 1989 (}c:tob(;~r' 2.~) '1 1909 CllY of Wh~IU( ~rJHING~ CITY liiANAGER Mr. Richard Rozansky Ci t.\/ !'lr:;'.nc:\qE!I'" City of Winter Springs 1126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, FL 32708 . i'" 1"'. F\ o;:~ .;;:\ n ~:; k V ~ I do not believe my request for a permit to park my recreation vehicle on my residential property was given adequate consideration by some Commissioners at the meeting, October 23, 1989, prior to deciding against my request. Therefore, I hereby request reconsideration of my oriqinal request for a permit. The main concerns seemed to be with the fact that my RV was visible over the top of a six foot privacy fence when looking into my back yard and that there is a restriction established in the city code of 28 feet without obtaining a permit. Due consideration was not given to the fact that my RV is contained completely in my back yard, . dOl2S n(Jt c1c!(JI'-..::\c1(? thf:? nE~i qhborhood and is not obj f.?ct i Dn.;;.\b 1 (? to my rl E~ i qhb or"~:;. It is difficult to determine why the 28 feet restriction was placed in the Code, but it can be assumed that 28 feet was the average length in 1978, when the restriction was included. Today, according to the Recreation Vehicle Industry Association, 75 percent of all Class A motor homes are 30 to 34 feet in length. The City Code should again be modified or ammended to keep current and up-to-date with today's requirements. In support of my request for reconsideration, please find attached a statement from my immediate neighbors across the street, next door to the north, and directly behind who have no objection to me parking my motor home in my back yard. (My neighbor on the south is somewhat of a recluse and has nothing to do with others in the neighborhood. He recently stated to me that he had no objection but n:::i:Uc.;E'c:1 to c.:;i qn any ~::;tc.:d:.f?mEmt s:;ay1 rig "h(~) woul d not si qn ,::mythi rlq .FCJI~ <:\n '/b Dd '/ II . ;. Additionally, I would like to reiterate that: My motor home is not readily visible from the front of the house 0(' ~;t('(:?f.::t; . Does not degrade the neighborhood or block any view down the ~:;tl'-f2et ; Does not interfere with any neighbor's view, property or privacy; . --2- Is not any larger in height and width than a motor home that is 28 feet in length and; Is contained in my back yard which is enclosed on all sides with a si}: foot privacy fence. Also, please find enclosed photographs of my house from the front with a south view, north view, and perpendicular view that looks into my back yard. The motor home is barely visible only in the perpendicular view that looks into my back yard. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. K. .. EDELEN 307 Birch Terrace Winter Springs, FL 32708 . Phone: 327-5942 . . :':~~j (Jc:t.CJbE~r- 19t3C; To Whom It May Concern; We, the undersigned, find and have no objection to K. D. Edelen parking his 32 foot Elandan recreation vehicle on his residential property at 307 Birch Terrace. The recreation vehicle is parked in the back yard, behind a privacy fence, is not obviously visible from the street and does not degrade the appearance of the neighborhood. ~-? .... \- . (\ _...__._.~----~~---_.__._._----_._-- (N,,,,mt.~ ) 'm~J~:J'i\ID-~~~-_._-_._- (f\lcilne) \l . ........~~~~ . '.. . (.......... . '_,__'~'~"""'~' 'w' _"M";'. ._ .__..__._..___.__.____._ _.___ ~ N c\(nc~ ) I" . L/2 - .-:-L~.~-..._. ~ I\IcHn<;0 . ._)~--~..~_. (Adclres~~ ) ~()ll~.--~~:~--...-.------ (?)Cldl"'E'~s;s ) _2ilis..~~-- ~~_~_________ (f~ddres:~ ) -2_~L iA~&~_ ( Add r-E~'~,; s ) -/-L....J- . ~~ e:w . . . e< e .. - ~A/l.~:/ 1 1F1 rL- ~U8LIC WORKS DE?ARTHENT i1'.:J : City hanager- t-r.-.~m : G. E. Ar.- t Ina n .,g rr:; Date: (lctOJ:;er .:../. 1-;39 .sUDJect: Ht. Greenwood Arbor Vlo1atlon ================================================================= I nave reviewed 6eCtlOn S-S Or the C1CY Arbor 0rolnance and It 18 llil' Ulcer pre tat 10n lilat re:fD.ce~;tal1Dn 1S bas,,=:don .2.~, pC.l.!HS p"=:1 ~cre. An acre is approximately 44,000 aquar,,=: reet. The area in '-1U';:S~ 101, enC()liiJ>:::i.S~es 2'::, ,401..1 squat'e rer::::l WblCh equates tc S~.)Q or an aCL'e c,r- 13 it': p(~)lnt:;;. it 1.'3 my recommendatlon t!iat SIlE;j,lLnol1Juvenlle ," c~lljJeri Le l~lanted 6.10n9 the back Ot' Lhr.:: The:;;e trees !lave a one pOlllt value eacn. trees li;:' nl':;Jll and lets 1n questlon. It' lhiS meets Wlln your approval, 1 Wlll deteLllilne the most SUit5-.!:.>le specle ,..)r tree ror- thls S011 condltH.:.n and present these r l n<:'ll ng oS l [) tilt:: ueve 1 oper . ~~~@;aw~@ OCT 27 }gas CITY of Wlii I tr< ~rRING~ CITY MANAGER . . . -"',,": ,.. f~~~nwm:@ NOV 1 1989 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY of WINTER SPRINGS CITY MANAGER 'r,:.; : elt! Commission C.l. (y Manager ~ '. e! e.- 14-, e<<cR4.. liJ//3./fry l Via: from: G. .c. Artman ~~ Date: November 1, 1989 SubJect: Mt. Greewood ArDor Vlo1atlon ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1 computed thE: pOlnl va1uatlon for rerr,)rE:stallon dF.:al.ing WltJ. He. Gr-eenwood ArDor Vl01atlon \.seE: attached). After conversation wltb U,F.: Cni l:ianager', I contCicted Hr. 0111 l~all.is Or Amer.l.rHst. Corporallen dnLl he agree:d l.Hth the r.l.nctlnqs. Amer 11: H st Cor'pora t lon W 111 plan t 1'::' sm.::d 1,. ncnJuvenl1e tr eE::S diong the Dack r2l1Ce 11110:: of lots in questlon. It was det2rmlned l.Lal trle lllo~t SUl tar:Jle tree ror th.l.s SO.l.l cond.l.t lon 'would be Laure! Oaks. These trees w111 be planted as these lots are developed, thlS w111 ensure survlval.