HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986 10 13 Regular
l
t'
\
CITY OF WI NTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708
Telephone (305) 327-1800
CITY MANAGER
RICHARD ROZANSKY
MEMORANDUM:
DATE: OCTOBER 13, 1986
TO: CITY COMMISSION/MAYOR
FRml: CITY MANAGER ~
SUBJECT: CADD SYSTEM
1. Boyle Engineering Corporation by our instruction has prepared a brochure
explaining the four options the engineer and I reviewed in our review of
the CADD program for Winter Springs. The cost of each alternative is included.
2. A brief summary of the four options follows.
(a) OPTION I 1: This option while the lowest in cost provides DO contours.
We consider the inclusion of contours essential to a successful CAbD
mapping project. Cost: $53,509.00.
-/
(b) OPTION I 2: This option provides for contours now. While this
option costs more initually, in the long run, it is the cheapest. It
saves on duplication of effort and thus cost. Cost: $77,691.00
(c) OPTION I 3: This option is flown at low altitude as is option
# 2 with the main difference being contours would be added later in
the project as would $29,888.00. in additional costs. Total Cost! $91,834.00
(d) OPTION I 4: This option offers DO contours now, contours later
with reflying. The initial cost of this option is $53,509.00 the same
as option # 1. However when contours are desired reflying the project
(low altitude) along with the required additional work would add $45,837.00.
Cost: $99,346.00.
3. After taking the above into consideration as well as meeting with the
consultant on numerous occasions we are recommending option # 2 as it is
the most cost effective and meets our needs present and future.
4. This years' budget has $20,000.00 set aside for the CADD System in our
Capital improvement/Capital Equipment account. There is another $64,348.00
in reserves. Additionally, since this program will address road and drainage
it is possible we may utilize some of the $185,830.00 we have in our Transportation
Improvement Fund.
5. Members of Boyle Engineering Corporation will be at the October 13, 1986
Commission meeting to discuss the matter with the Commission.
jds
~~~~
.jc; 'IlINT~. .,
&CJ'}
v... * .;
't, /'
~.'\..~"',~ _ ~_a!":~ ".-$
"'" ...... W"" ,</
"'~-;":~
/ ) ) .
9 /7"7 !{,
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
MEMO:
1126 STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708
Telephone (305) 327-1800
September 18, 1986
TO: City Manager, Mayor, and Commissioners
FROM: Land Development Coordinator ~
RE: Mt. Greenwood, Tract 7, Final Engineering Approval
Staff Review of Final Engineering of Tract 7 for Nt. Greenwood was held
September 16, 1986. No significant changes, alterations, or modifications
from Preliminary Plans previously approved by the Planning and Zoning Board
were noted. Resolution of all engineering concerns was satisfied per the
City Engineers letter of August 18, 1986. Commissions approval of Final
Engineering of Tract 7 is required.
Attachments
BP/mh
~~.x
-~'fl\NTER '.
i~r,5"",
iJ \\~
: ~ :
"" ....~.. ;
.,. . .
+ ,
.~, +- . . ~..
............ ~..,-
~,.i--.s:..-~. . ~
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
1126 STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708
Telephone (305) 327-1800
August 18, 1986
Mr. C. R. Burdick, P.E.
Boyer. Singleton Associates, Inc.
520 South Magnolia Ave.
Orlando. FL 32801
RE: Mt. Greenwood, Tract 7
Dear Mr. Burdick:
The documentation you submitted for Mt. Greenwood, Tract 7, via your letter
of August 13, 1986, was reviewed and was found to be in accordance with my letter
of August I, 1986. Therefore, the engineering for Tract 7 has been determined to
be satisfactory.
Sincerely.
.~-
\
~
~ ....1 h
~. '0 "c5//I?
,/ L.T. Kozlovy' P.E.
City -Enginyer
LTK/mmh
cc: City Manager
Land Development Coordinator
Building Department
~
".
"',
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
,
,
I
I
,
I
I
,
I
I
I
/ I
/ /
/
/
/
/
, I
'1
:1
~II
~:I
~!:I
~ "1:1
~ ~i II
,- ~~It
\,: I
, ~~ I
~; i
" : Ii
~ VI: II
~ ~. I
~~! II
~~i :1
1\\1 ~:
~ l\\i: 1
,,: 'I
. I
~; III
~I
. .-...........--....
.as
,,\
'\i
< ~
.'
I
I
I
\f;\
\~
,
I
I
,
I
I
\
\
\'"
~
~
",
L
I '\ t!J'.(~.~,';~~,:'.'~rf\<ll~~~~~lI","1
, :,
: ,
\l\.. S\
~ ~.. '\l
~ 31:lH 0 \
,
'OJ
\ . L \.\ N
. T--t\------.c; '\
f\\\\\\~\\
: ' , I \ \ c\ \ \
~ ,~I \ ~ .1\ ~\\, \~\.. <~\. ;.~~
\ '0. \ \ :~".., \ \ \ \ ;'
,___ __.'..__. "'-\-",-,+. ;... \ I \ \ , : \
\ \ \ \ \. \. \ \.
jj'III\"\'"
,,, Cb 1 ' \ ~' i\ \^
) ~ ~ i ~ '\ ! " '9~ ~\ I ~\
I! 1';' / ~/ ~ // \ :\ \
~L_, / / ~ Q/ \:,
-'~'/1d'..5'/(/) 1 .......
, .
;/I';',
I ,
,
\
,
~\
'-'\
,
,
,
~\
,
,
,
,
~\
''''".
/8 , , \
/ , \
~/ I -~ ~ ~ ' ~ I
/ " ~ \
/ , , ,
/ , \
/ , , \
, " , I
,
, , J
, , I I
~ , l\.. '~ /-t\ /
~ ',~ ~ It\/
<Xl , '- /
100 , , I
/
~
~
I ~71 I I I
/ ,Ie.: I ,I I' I \()~/
!?o/""""
I 0 : ~ I~ \ ~ 'M --~
~'..I....... I~.r 1,~J~~ '\
I Tf.. \1 \ ;f' I J,
II'..~' 'c\'
" \ t\:. II ~\ ~"', "'-_..../ ~ /'
I 't\:.. \"" .,' ~ '51
I \. \ '" ................ - ..,./
\ " eo... \. ......2'l -_/
'-
"J/'ld' ~B ,,-...-
\ N \
\21 \
~\
~\ ~
\
,
~
"
~
" "
"
,
,
'" \
,
.........L...:-......,,__
~
~
~".
...,
.--'
.
CONSULTING
ENGINEERING
ENGINEERS
ASSOCIATES.
IN C .
COMMONWEALTH
President
John D, Froscher. P,E.. CO,
Vice Presidenls
James C Boyd. P.E,
Michad S. Craig. P.E,
Associates
Stephen E, Bailey, p, E,
Eric l. Secord
David E, Allen. P,E,
Cheryl A. Onersen
Ellen R, Haver!
October 13, 1986
~ ~~ C()fUM/fk#(dlZ
Lf!.c, ~, p{~
(..CT'r ~I tUGL .
~1 ,,;I?I~.~n"i][t~ ~n 'Of~,~
,,~!~ \~/I\WOl~ LJ (0.1 I .l'"d
. f 'l.:il ~ " \.Vi) "V;:,
.~ ~ J
,\/ ~
OCT 13 mas
3~,g() PM.
CITY of WINTER SPRINGS
CITY MANAGER
Mr. Lee Miller
Department of Environmental Regulation
3319 Maguire Blvd., Suite 232
Orlando, FL 32803
Re: Mount Greenwood Effluent Disposal Facility
CEA Project No. 108-01-302
Dear Mr. Miller:
Commonwealth Engineering Associates, Inc. had assumed the concern
over the wells at the above-referenced site had been resolved. We are
submitting the enclosed information so that we can finally put this
matter to rest.
In an effort to clarify the well location question, the
methodology was used to determine the location of wells in
following
the area:
The first step was obtaining a computer search for wells
registered with the USGS. The second step was the use of aerial
photographics to determine areas adjacent to the project which would
require an additional investigation. Next a site inspection of
those areas identified in the previous step was conducted, and
finally a survey was conducted to verify distances from the wells to
the effluent application area.
Based on the above methodology, several wells were discovered to be
within 500 ft of the effluent disposal facilities.
The discovered wells, those within the 500 ft limit, were properly
abandoned and those houses were connected to city potable water
supplies. The cost associated with this work was paid for by the
applicant.
With the receipt of your letter and Mr. Mike Darwin's letter, we
have reviewed our previous work done to determine the locations of 011
wells. Also, we have inspected the site including properties on Bahama
and Hayes Road. As a result of this work, we can not find any woter
supply wells, shallow or deep, potable or non-potable, within 500 ft of
the effluent disposal facilities.
-860 S,R, 434 NORTH, SUITE A - AlTAMONTE SPRINGS, Fl 32714 - (305) 788-8111-
Mr. Lee Mi ller
Department of Environmental Regulation
October 13, 1986
Page 2
Mr. Darwin's letter was not specific as to where the undiscovered
wells were located and since there are several effluent disposal
facilities located within the areas which encompasses the Ranchlands of
Winter Springs, we cannot determine if Mr. Darwin's comments apply to
this project. Once again, to the best of our knowledge, there are no
water supply wells of any kind within 5~~ feet of the above-referenced
facility.
A meeting was held with the Director of Utilities for the City of
Winter Springs. The purpose of the meeting was to insure that we had
not overlooked any water services. The Utility Director confirmed that
houses we assumed were serviced by the City, were in foct connected to
the City water supplies.
There are several other factors concerning the Ranchlands and the
project that should be noted. The project is located adjacent to the
north boundary of the area considered the Ranchlonds. The regional
groundwater movement is to the north and northwest. The movement is
directly oway from wells which supply water to the "frightened
homeowners". Additionally, the well depth of 85 ft as given in Mr.
Dorwin's letter would make the source of water the Floridan Aquifer;
therefore, the wells should not be considered shallow water supply
wells. The deep well separation distance, as stated in "The Land
Application Manual", is 1~~ ft.
As for the other comments made by Mr. Darwin, we question his use of
the term "defect" with regard to the facility design. The nomenclature
aside, the pond design is undergoing remedial action for both design ond
operational fine tuning. WHen these actions are complete ond the
construction is certified complete, we will again start to gather
operational data required to obtain the operating permit as required by
Florida Administrative Code.
AmeriFirst Development Corporation, Commonwealth Engineering
Associates, Inc., and the City of Winter Springs Utility Department has
cooperated to provide a facility to the area residents which will not be
a detriment to the area. Everyone has attempted to comply fully with
the wishes as well as the whims of the area residents. We know of
nothing else that can be done to make the residents in the areo more
receptive to the facility.
We hope this letter answers your concerns prompted by the
Ranchlands Homeowners' Association, if not, please feel free to contact
this office so we can supply additional information.
Very truly yours,
Commonwealth Engineering Associates, Inc.
.~; e~---b;'
, Stephen E. Bailey, P.E. ~
Senior Project Engineer
cc: Dennis Quinn,Rtchard Rozansky, Doug Taylor
LJD~
QD~
Charter Review Board:
Leanne Grove, 626 Alton Road - 327-1607
Lawrence Cerra, 1383 Blue Spruce Court - 365-2314
George Hogan, 228 Mockingbird Lane - 327-2029
Buck Adkins, 753 Bear Creek Circle - 365-6582
John Nystrom, 758 Gretna Court - 695-4435
Elaine Jones, 560 Dunmar Circle - 695-1680
Ed MacGennis, 710 Gretna Court - 695-4375
_~NT~~.~,
~.}.Cj\.
HU '
Q . ,
'of'. ,~~" '"
..,.. * . ,'<
,.. ;1
'{:" ~ ,- ..,.
'<, ..~ ","",' ..,:;-
"'~~
!./
,I
4,/
/ .
~~/. ~ I r\J
Li) ( 6t)
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
1126 STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708
Telephone (305) 327-1800
MEMO: September 18, 1986
TO: City Manager, Commissioners, and Mayor
FROM: Land Development Coordinator ~
RE: Foxmoor East Request To Commission For Waiver To Subdivision Requirement
and Replat Approval.
1. The attached 8!i"x 11" drawing shows the Foxmoor East area (yellow) as
currently platted. It is zoned R-l-AA. The owners of the property
wish to align the lot layouts with the zoning. The copy of the replat
is attached.
2. Ne 10:1, Aiken & Chancellor's letter of September 17, 1986, comments
that the disposition on the remaining portions of Lot 11, Block C,
Lot 7, Block B, and Lot 5, Block A, be left in a rural character to
provide a transition into the Ranchlands. The zoning on these three
larger lots remains R-l-AA and their designation remains as platted in
1958 on Plat Book 12, Page 34. They would not be part of the subdivision,
and hence the 5% recreational fee of the accessed value would amount to $8,250.
3. The Staff finds the request for Waiver of Subdivision requirements approp-
riate and the requirements for replat per Section 14-44 are being met
prior to recording at the county.
Attachments
BP/mh
NEWLON, AIKEN & CHANCELWR
September 17, 1986
Mr. Bob Powell, Land Development Coordinator
City of Winter Springs
1126 East S.R. 434
Winter Springs, Florida 32708
Re: Foxmoor East Replat
Dear Mr. Powell:
In accordance with my letter dated August 11, 1986 to Mr. Rozansky,
attached. we have prepared a plat reflecting your comments at the staff
review August 16, 1986. Eight copies of the replat are enclosed.
We met September 10, 1986 and discussed the inclusion of the balance of
Lots 5 - Blk. A, 7 - Blk. Band 11 - Blk. C; North Orlando Ranches Section 3
as recorded in Plat Book 12, Page 33 and 34 of the Public Records of Seminole
County, Florida. Following our meeting, you sent me a letter dated
September 12, 1986, a copy of which is attached.
It is our intention that the balance of Lots 5 - Blk. A, 7 - Blk. Band
11 - Blk. C remain in a rural character to provide a transition into the
Ranches. As indicated during our conversations, we do not agree that
Section 14-61 of the Winter Spring City Code is applicable, as all of the
property in North Orlando Ranches Section 3 being replatted is placed in
lots, streets, and other useable tracts. Furthermore, the balance not
included in the replat remains platted as North Orlando Ranches, Section 3
and is not land locked.
However, we will be happy to accomodate your request that we include
the balance of Lots 5 - Blk. A, 7 - Blk. Band 11 - Blk. C in the replat so
long as the replat qualifies for waiver to subdivision requirements under
Section 14-32 of the Winter Springs City Code. Accordingly, enclosed,
please find eight copies of the replat which includes the balance of the
property.
Either plat is acceptable to us. However, we do not wish to be placed
into a Catch 22 situation regarding processing or improvement requirements.
We are also dedicating 3.169 acres of additional property as drainage
easements, Tracts A & B (1.321 AC.) and the conservation easement behind Lots
1 through 10 (1.848 AC.) in this replat. The total property involved in
the partial replat is 15.567 acres and 18.48 acres in the full replat.
ENVIRONMENTAL. UTILITY & DEVELOPMENT COUNSELORS
REAL ESTATE BROKERAGE & INVESTMENTS
Rosemonl Building. Suite 206. 5104 North Orange Blossom Trail
STAFF REVIEW MEETING
August 19, 1986
PRESENT WERE:
Doug Taylor, Utility Manager
John Govoruhk, Police Chief
Charles Holzman, Fire Chief
Sam Smith, Building Official
Len Kozlov, City Engineer
Gil Artman, Public Works Director
Bob Powell, Land Development Coordinator
Richard Rozansky, City Manager
Gerald Chancellor, Owner/Developer
FOXMOOR EAST REPLAT:
Powell stated that this project is being looked at as a waiver to subdivision since
the infrastructure is already existing. The property and lots as proposed brings
it into line with the R-lAA zoning existing for the area.
There was discussion on the drainage.
Chancellor stated that he understands the City's concerns, but stated that he feels
he is being asked to resolve drainage problems up stream.
Kozlov stated that this was not what he was trying to convey. There is not a drainage
problem now, but with what the developer is doing, this may cause a problem with the
drainage. He stated to the developer to take all the appropriate steps and measures
to review this, and if there is an impact, there may be a necessity to have a deten-
tion pond on lot next to lot 10. (South)
There was discussion on the infrastructure. It was noted that the developer should
find some history of what was done to develop the infrastructure when the Foxmoor
projects were first started.
Taylor stated that there is a need for 6 inch pipe in order to serve the lots in
the area of Sunset Drive.
Chancellor stated that the engineer proposed to put in 6 inch pipe~.
There was discussion on the use of a ditch/easement that was dug years ago. It
was determined that the developer would eliminate the easement on lots 29 & 30
and have an easement on the back half of lots 27 & 28.
There was discussion on the sidewalks. It was determined that the developer would
record on the plat that the sidewalks would be put in by the developer after construc-
tion of the homes.
There was discussion on the subdivision recreation requirement. It was determined
that the developer would donate to the City recreation fund, an amount 5% of the
accessed property value in lieu of the 5% property to be used as recreation site.