The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1986 10 06 Workshop -, " .' e CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708 Telephone (305) 327-1800 CITY MANAGER RICHARD ROZANSKY MEMORANDUM: DATE: OCTOBER 13, 1986 TO: CITY COMMISSION/MAYOR FRml: CITY MANAGER ~ SUBJECT: CADD SYSTEM 1. Boyle Engineering Corporation by our instruction has prepared a brochure explaining the four options the engineer and I reviewed in our review of the CADD program for Winter Springs. The cost of each alternative is included. . 2. A brief summary of the four options follows. (a) OPTION I 1: This option while the lowest in cost provides DO contours. We consider the inclusion of contours essential to a successful C-ADD mapping project. Cost: $53,509.00. -/ (b) OPTION I 2: This option provides for contours now. While this option costs more initually, in the long run, it is the cheapest. It saves on duplication of effort and thus cost. Cost: $77,691.00 (c) OPTION I 3: This option is flown at low altitude as is option # 2 with the main difference being contours would be added later in the project as would $29,888.00. in additional costs. Total Cost ~ $91,834.00 (d) OPTION I 4: This option offers DO contours now, contours later with reflying. The initial cost of this option is $53,509.00 the same as option # 1. However when contours are desired reflying the project (low altitude) along with the required additional work would add $45,837.00. Cost: $99,346.00. 3. After taking the above into consideration as well as meeting with the consultant on numerous occasions we are recommending option # 2 as it is the most cost effective and meets our needs present and future. 4. This years' budget has $20,000.00 set aside for the CADD System in our Capital improvement/Capital Equipment account. There is another $64,348.00 in reserves. Additionally, since this program will address road and drainage it is possible we may utilize some of the $185,830.00 we have in our Transportation Improvement Fund. - 5. Members of Boyle Engineering Corporation will be at the October 13, 1986 Commission meeting to discuss the matter with the Commission. jds \ . .;~\~""> k~., ~u . ~ ~ '~~.. : ~ . . ~ 't~ ~,~ ~.\,. ''''tv """"~...'/ "'~"';~ I Y . C; /7/ L ,f-( '/ . CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 1126 STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708 Telephone (305) 327.1800 MEMO: September 18, 1986 TO: City Manager, Mayor, and Commissioners FROM: Land Development Coordinator ~ RE: Mt. Greenwood, Tract 7, Final Engineering Approval e Staff Review of Final Engineering of Tract 7 for Nt. Greenwood was held September 16, 1986. No significant changes, alterations, or modifications from Preliminary Plans previously approved by the Planning and Zoning Board were noted. Resolution of all engineering concerns was satisfied per the City Engineers letter of August 18, 1986. Commissions approval of Final Engineering of Tract 7 is required. .\ Attachments BP/mh e .. e -~~TER->', (it)\ .,.. . , + , {..,r,."", ..... "--~...., ~'--- ~-j,"$~~..' . CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 1126 STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708 Telephone (305) 327-1800 August 18, 1986 Mr. C. R. Burdick, P.E. Boyer, Singleton Associates, Inc. 520 South Magnolia Ave. Orlando, FL 32801 RE: Mt. Greenwood, Tract 7 Dear Mr. Burdick: The documentation you submitted for Mt. Greenwood, Tract 7, via your letter of August 13, 1986, was reviewed and was found to be in accordance with my letter of August 1, 1986. Therefore, the engineering for Tract 7 has been determined to ~ be satisfactory. Sincerely, ....,.;---~ ~~ ~. ,.' 6'///7 ,/ L.T. Kozlovy P.E. City -Engi/:l.~r LTK/mmh cc: City Manager Land Development Coordinator Building Department e .,,"""'~, It' '" ~ \ ~~~~ ~ ~I ~. \1\111\1 \,'\ \1\1\1\\ .'\ I I I I \ \ \ .' \ I \ \ \ I \ \ \ " tl.;,,, 'l, I ~ \ \ ~ \ \ I()\ \\j~ '~ ~ \ I \~ \~' ,t\t.: \ 8, ,\\\..\ '\, ~\ I\\I.I.'\C''!>\ \V' " ". ~, ~ I ~ 1'1 I ~I I ~:I ~:: " ~;, \'\. : I \.: II I.~~:I : ~: It ' "'; I I \:l: I ~: i s:: . I ~ ~~ : ,,\:::: I ~~i : I [\\1 ~: ! '\(~: \ I I . I ! ~1 :1: , ~ I' I . I, 1 / / ,III I : !II / : 1/ I / : 1/ t/ I. I I ./ /q/. .....~' I { I / / ~~,./r. II /..,~// : / / I I S ~I ;' /:/ ~ :~.),.,.'''''~' .," " ~ ~ ~ ~; . Charter Review Board: Leanne Grove, 626 Alton Road - 327-1607 Lawrence Cerra, 1383 Blue Spruce Court - 365-2314 George Hogan, 228 Mockingbird Lane - 327-2029 Buck Adkins, 753 Bear Creek Circle - 365-6582 John Nystrom, 758 Gretna Court - 695-4435 Elaine Jones, 560 Dunmar Circle - 695-1680 Ed MacGennis, 710 Gretna Court - 695-4375 (e e .~f e Mr. Lee Miller Department of Environmental Regulation October 13, 1986 Page 2 Mr. Darwin's letter was not specific as to where the undiscovered wells were located and since there are several effluent disposal facilities located within the areas which encompasses the Ranchlands of Winter Springs, we cannot determine if Mr. Darwin's comments apply to this project. Once again, to the best of our knowledge, there are no water supply wells of any kind within 5~~ feet of the above-referenced facili ty. A meeting was held with the Director of Utilities for the City of Winter Springs. The purpose of the meeting was to insure that we had not overlooked any water services. The Utility Director confirmed that houses we assumed were serviced by the City, were in fact connected to the City water supplies. There are several other factors concerning the Ranchlands and the project that should be noted. The project is located adjacent to the north boundary of the area considered the Ranchlands. The regional groundwater movement is to the north and northwest. The movement is directly away from wells which supply water to the "frightened homeowners". Additionally, the well depth of 85 ft as given in Mr. Darwin's letter would make the source of water the Floridan Aquifer; therefore, the wells should not be considered shallow water supply wells. The deep well separation distance, as stated in "The Land Application Manual", is 1~~ ft. . As for the other comments made by Mr. Darwin, we question his use of the term "defect" with regard to the facility design. The nomenclature aside, the pond design is undergoing remedial action for both design and operational fine tuning. WMen these actions are complete and the construction is certified complete, we will again start to gather operational data required to obtain the operating permit as required by Florida Administrative Code. AmeriFirst Development Corporation, Commonwealth Engineering Associates, Inc., and the City of Winter Springs Utility Department has cooperated to provide a facility to the area residents which will not be a detriment to the area. Everyone has attempted to comply fully with the wishes as well as the whims of the area residents. We know of nothing else that can be done to make the residents in the area more rec~ptive to th~ facility. We hope this letter answers your concerns prompted by the Ranchlands Homeowners' Association, if not, please feel free to contact this office so we can supply additional information. !it.. Very truly yours, Commonwealth Engineering Associates, Inc. ~ . ..~~6~---6~ . Stephen E. Bailey, P. E. cr- 4It Senior Project Engineer cc: Dennis Quinn. RIchard Razansky. Doug Taylor LJD~ \]D~ ~ e COMMONWEALTH ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. IN C . CONSULTING ENGINEERS Prt'sident John D. Froscht'r. P.E.. CO. Vice Presidents James C Boyd. P.E. Michael S. Craig. P.E. Associatt's Stepht'n E. Bailt'y. P. E. Eric l. Secord David E. Allen. P.E. Cht'ryl A. Onersen Ellen R. Haver! October 13, 1986 &1 s~ C(};UMjfk#ltllZ L6c, ~, Pl~ C 'T'r ~ I tUG-l.. . ~~.:;j"rflI~.~rnV]l[~~f! 'Of~.~ :/ t ~I ~ l.a LJ (',;~ I lv$ wS ..1. ~ ~J .v t1ttLAL OCT 13 19a5 3~,g~ PM. CITY of WINTER SPRINGS CITY MANAGER Mr. Lee Miller Department of Environmental Regulation 3319 Maguire Blvd., Suite 232 Orlando, FL 328~3 Re: Mount Greenwood Effluent Disposal Facility CEA Project No. 1~8-~1-3~2 Dear Mr. Miller: . Commonwealth Engineering Associates, Inc. had assumed the concern over the wells at the above-referenced site had been resolved. We are submitting the enclosed information so that we can finally put this matter to rest. In an effort to clarify the well location question, the methodology was used to determine the location of wells in following the area: The first step was obtaining a computer search for wells registered with the USGS. The second step was the use of aerial photographics to determine areas adjacent to the project which would require an additional investigation. Next a site inspection of those areas identified in the previous step was conducted, and finally a survey was conducted to verify distances from the wells to the effluent application area. Based on the above methodology, several wells were discovered to be within 5e~ ft of the effluent disposal facilities. The discovered wells, those within the 5ee ft limit, were properly abandoned and those houses were connected to city potable water supplies. The cost associated with this work was paid for by the applicant. e With the receipt of your letter and Mr. Mike Darwin's letter, we have reviewed our previous work done to determine the locations of all wells. Also, we have inspected the site including properties on Bahama and Hayes Road. As a result of this work, we can not find any water supply wells, shallow or deep, potable or non-potable, within 5~~ ft of the effluent disposal facilities. -860 S.R. 434 NORTH. SUITE A - AlTAMONTE SPRINGS. Fl 32714 -(305) 788-8111-