Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986 03 24 Regular ." ,-~\NTEA" . . -<1 .'--'" .~. '.-~(r-""~~.' e" ,) jV . r, ... " . .) '",'" j . " /'. '/ "to, .01' ;. I . ~,~~:':'~ ~":.,.' ' CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 1126 STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708 Telephone (305) 327-1800 March 24, 1986 MEMORANDUM FROM: CITY ENGINEER ~ / TO: JACKIE KOCH SUBJECT: COMMENTS ON PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR TRACTS 5 & 7, MT. GREENWOOD PUB e Generally the conceptual plan is satisfactory with the following exceptions of the drawings that were provided. 1. Tract 5, sheet 2 of 2, dated 1/2/86, there is no potable water line connection shown to the existing water line on Mt. Greenwood Blvd. This issue was brought up at a preliminary meeting. The engineer claimed that there was an updated drawing providing this information. It will be necessary to have the corrected drawing. 2. It will be necessary for the engineer to re-evaluate the direction of slope of the gravity mains in both tracts 5 and 7. It appears that the gravity sanitary mains are sloped in a direction where the topographic elevations rise. The results of such a design would be deep manholes which would create maintenance and safety problems for staff members in the utility department. 3. On the drawing typical road section, Tract 7, dated 1/2/86, the sidewalk is noted to be immediately adjacent to the edge of the right-of-way line. Section 14-126, Land Development Code requires a one (1) foot separation between the edge of the sidewalk and the right-of-way line. However, I will accept this modification. . cc: City Manager Public Works Dept. Building Department Lie (DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE) . FROM Charles L. Holzman JacxnJeline Koch DEP'T Director of Administration DEP'T Fire SUBJECT Mt. Greenwood PUD Review, Tracts 5 and 7 DATE ~..arch 19, 1986 A thorough review of Mt. Greenwood Preliminary Subdivision Plan, Final Developrrent Plan, Tract 5 and Final Developrrent Plan, Tract 7, indicates that fire hydrant positioning and distant placerrent rreets our code requirerrents. Further coordination is needed, however, to insure that utilities corrpanies do not place power/light poles, transforrrers, and/or telephone con- trol boxes wi thin the restricted limits of fire hydrants. tit ~/~~- Char les L. Horzrran Fire Chief . e e . Go -..... AMERIFIRSf H:,l 'Ii'alilgar (;oUI1, Suitt' 20B Maitland. Florida 32751 DEVELOPMENT [oRPoRATIoN February 24, 1986 Ms. Jacqueline Koch City Planner City of Winter Springs 1126 State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 Re: Mount Greenwood Tracts 3, 4 and 5 Dear Ms. Koch: The referenced tracts within the Mount Greewood PUD are proposed for development as fee simple attached townhouses. These sub- divisions will have private streets with adjacent off street parking facilities as shown on the engineering plans for these tracts. These streets and parking facilities will be a part of the limited common properties in these subdivisions and will be owned and maintained by the appropriate homeowners associations. AmeriFirst Development Corporation, therefore, respectfully, requests a waiver of the right-of-way requirements under the design/construction standards per Section 14-95 (private streets) of the City of Winter Springs, Florida Land Development Regulations. Should you have any questions on this matter or need additional information, please advise. ;N;4 Wr. ~n \ C. Philip wa11~ Senior Vice President CPW/k1b ~ Regular Meeting, City Commission Meeting Feb. 24, 1986 Page 3 85-86-11 ~ . Motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs to approve the final engineering for Tuscawilla Unit l4-B with the exception of the slopes of the ponds to be determined at a later date after consultation with the former counsel of D.E.R. in the Tallahassee office of our City Attorney, Mr. Richard Lee. Seconded by Commissioner Trencher. Discussion. In discussion Commissioner Trencher asked to amend the motion to have that clarified in writing. The City Engineer said the same concerns we have in 14-A be also carried over to 14-B. Vote on the motion: Commissioner Hoffmann, aye; Commissioner Ku1bes, aye; Commissioner Jacobs, aye; Commissioner Trencher, aye; Commissioner Kaehler, aye; motion carried. Final Engineering of Mt. Greenwood, Tracts 3 and 4: The City Planner explained that Tracts 3 and 4 are townhouse tracts of the northern section of the Mt. Greenwood P.U.D. The City Engineer and Staff are recommending approval of the final engineering. Mr. Phil Wallace from Amerifirst spoke to the Commission. Motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs for the approval of the final engineering of Mt. Greenwood, Tracts 3 and 4 and a waiver of Section 14-95 as requested in the Amerifirst letter of 'Feb. 24, 1986. Seconded by Commissioner Hoffmann for discussion. Discussion. Vote on 'the motion: Commissioner Ku1bes, aye; Commissioner Jacobs, aye; Commissioner Trencher, aye; Commissioner Kahe1er, no; Commissioner Hoffmann, aye; motion carried. . Final Engineering of St. Stephens Catholic Church in Tuscawilla: The City Planner reported that Staff has reviewed the final engineering and recommend approval. Motion was made by Commissioner Trencher to accept the recommendation. Seconded by Commissioner Jacobs. Discussion. Vote on the motion: Commissioner Jacobs, aye; Commissioner Trencher, aye; Commissioner Kaehler, aye; Commissioner Hoffmann, aye; Commissioner Ku1bes, aye; motion carried. Fee Resolution No. 533, fixing the fees to be paid by applicants with land develop- ment applications, zoning review applications, etc.: Attorney Kruppenbacher read Resolution No. 533 by title only. Motion was made by Commissioner Kulbes to adopt Resolution No. 533. Seconded by Commissioner Trencher. Discussion. Vote on the motion: Commissioner Trencher, aye; Commissioner Kaehler, aye; Commissioner Hoffmann, aye; Commissioner Kulbes, aye; Commissioner Jacobs, aye; motion carried. City Manager Richard Rozansky: Motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs to accept the bid from Macasphalt as submitted. ($89,482.50) Seconded by Commissioner Ku1bes. Discussion. Vote on the motion: Commissioner Hoffmann, aye; Commissioner Ku1bes, aye; Commissioner Jacobs, aye; Commissioner Trencher, aye; Commissioner Kaehler, aye; motion carried. 9-1-1, Street numbering ordinance and inter local agreement are to be reviewed and any comments be given to the City Manager. This will be on the agenda for the next meeting. . PIANNING AND ZCNING BOARD MINl1I'ES Wednesday, March 5, 19 86 ~ neeting was called to order by Cha.i.ntan Snedley at 7:51p.m. R)LL CALL: D. axert Srredley, 0la.iJ:nan, Present Richard DeFazio, Vioe-Olallmm, Present Gene I:brnan, Present Taru Joshi, Present Jon Hall, Present srAFF: Jacqueline Koch, Present APProvAL OF MINlJI'FS OF JANUARY 22, 1986: Richard DeFazio made the notion to approve the minutes of January 22, 1986, Seconded by Gene I:brman. vote: All Aye. M:>tion carries. Arrerifirst Developnent Cbrporation for anendnent of preliminary development plan for M::. Greenwood PUD: Applicant present: Phil Wallace, Arrerifirst DeveloJ;Ire11t Cbrporation. Ja<XJ\.Eline Koch gave her presentation. She stated that this request is to change the designation of Tract 5 from garden apartnents to t<::Ml'1h:>uses, which \tlOuld be the sane as Tracts 3 & 4. 'lhe original mmrer for the garden apart:Irents was 252 which would be decreased to 187 townh:mses. Also to increase the nurrber of patio hones in Tract 7 to 171 (up from 150). She also stated that this is an inprovenent and an up-grade to _ the area. 'Ih:! increase in patio hones \tlOuld not have a negative effect. She stated .., that the other aspect is to delete the recreation area in Tract 7 and locate all re- creation open to all residents of the PUD in Tract 6. 'lhe Staff had no negative OOIllll:llts. She raised the q\Estion of the relocation of all the recreation facilities to the central location; eliminating the one' that was to have been in the patio tares section and cx:noentrating everything in Tract 6. She stated that it would ccncentrate the nuisance e3.e:rlent being right across fran one particular residential area. Phil Wallace fran 1Iterifirst DevelcpteIlt CDrporation gave his presentation. He stated that the cnly thing they are roving is a termi.s oourt to Tract 6. He stated the re- quirerrents for Tract 6 was for a playing field, tot lot, and playgromd. He also stated that the developers want to give all residents tl'e use of the tennis oourt. He stated that the developers want to concentrate all constructed types of anenities into one location~ Gene I:bnnan asked if Tracts 1 & 2 have their own arrenity packages (recreation areas) . Phil Wallace stated no they do not, that it is cnly required in multi-family areas. G!ne D:>:cnan asked if the ln1eowners docunents have been prepared. Phil Wallace stated they have a rough draft prepared. JaCXJlEline Koch stated that Tracts 1, 2, & 7, have public streets and that the residents in Tract 7 will bela1g to the overall associaticn. e <l1ai.Iman Srredley asked what anenities will the recreaticn area part inclme. Phil Wallace stated that there will be a playing field which oould be used for foot- ball, baseball, ~r, or anything else. He stated that the total :rec:reati.cn area is 3.7 acres. 'Planning and Zoning Board Minutes . March 5, 1986 Page 2 AQlai.rmm Srredley stated that 1 tennis oourt in his point of view is not enough for - a 200 acre developrent. Richard DeFazio asked what percentage of the PUD was ~ recreation area. It was detenn:ined that 3% of tie whole PUD was the recreation area. Jon Hall asked what will be &::me with tie area in which tre tennis oourt will be noved. Phil Wallace stated that the developers will leave access to this area and tiere will be nore green area and will add park benches. Chairnen Srredley stated that this is a reqtEst for Anendrrent to the Preliminary ~velop- nent Plan. ' Richard ~Fazio made the notion that tre Master Plan of Mt. Greenwood PUD change Tract 5 from garden aparbTents to townh::mses and increase the nuni:ler of patio hones in Tract 7 and also tre termis oourt be noved to the center of the project in Tract 6. To be increased to double termis oourts due to the number of dYJelling units that will use it. Seoonded by Taru Joshi. Discussion. Gene Ibrnan stated the Board has to find that the proposed alterations is oonsistent with the previously approved ~veloprrent plan. e Richard I:eFazio withdrew his notion. 'I'an1 Joshi withdrew her second. Rid1ard I:eFazio rnade the notion to find that the Master Plan for the Mt. Greenwood PUD be oonsistent along with changes in Tract 5 to townhouses and increase the nunber of patio hones in Tract 7 to 171 and also oonsolidation of the proposed facilities in Tract 6 to inclu:le 2 tennis oourts because the total PUD wil:L be allc:Med to use the tennis oourts. M:>tion died due to lack of a seoond. Gene Ibrnan made the notion that the proposed anendrrent to the Mt. Greenwood PUD to be oonsistent with the previously approved Preliminary ~velotxrent Plan and that they approved anendrrents to change the type of housing in Tract 5 from garden apartrrents to townl'x)uses, and reduce the nunber of units from 252 to 187 and approve the addition of units in Tract 7 fran 150 to 171 units and nove the tennis court from Tract 7 to Tract 6, and with the stipulation that the tennis oourt be rnade a <DubIe oourt. Sea:>nded by Jon Hall. Vbte: All Aye. MJt:ion carries. e Jacx;I\E1ine Koch gave her presentatim. She stated that this is part of an overall nodification and renovation to the Q)lf (burse, that inclu:led a nmter of alterations that ~re awrovable 00 the Staff level. Tre one that was oonsidered by the Staff and the City Manager to be an actual addition was the creation of a lighted driving range. '!be oonstruction would CDIlSist ally of putting in ooncrete walks and rnats to tee off and installing flood lights. '!be actual c:pan area is already there, and is ..~~, e DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AMERIFIRsr 851 Trafalgar Court, Suite 208 Maitland, Florida 32751 February 20, 1986 Ms. Jacqueline Koch City Planner City of Winter Springs 1126 State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708 Re: Amendment to Mount Greenwood PUD Dear Ms. Koch: AmeriFirst Development Corporation is in the process of finalizing development plans and initiating actual construction of the Mount Greenwood PUD. Throughout this implementation phase, we are dis- covering a few areas in which modification of the original plans would be appropriate. The modifications consist of the following: 1. Overall reduction in density; 2. Transfer of density within the PUD; and, 3. Consolidation of recreational facilities plan. 4It Reduction in Density The Mount Greenwood PUD was first conceived as a 700 unit, mixed density PUD. During the initial public hearings, the City Council required a reduction in the density of Tract 5 (garden apartments/ condominiums) from 11.98 dwelling units per acre (DU/AC) to 10 DU/AC. This resulted in a total reduction of units in Tract 5 from 302 DU to 252 DU or an overall reduction in the PUD of 50 DU to a total of 650 DU. AmeriFirst Development is requesting a further re- duction in the density for Tract 5 from 252 to 187 DU. Transfer of Density With the elimination of a total of 65 DU from Tract 5, AmeriFirst Development requests a transfer of 21 units to Tract 7. Tract 7 was originally approved with 3500 sq. ft. patio home (zero lot line) lots. AmeriFirst Development proposes to create 4680 sq. ft. lots. This will result in a 33% increase in average lot size. These changes will result in an overall net decrease in dwelling units from 650 to 606. Consolidation of Recreational Facilities e AmeriFirst Development Corporation requests that the recreational facilities proposed for Tracts 6 and 7 be consolidated into one e e . Ms. Jacqueline Koch February 20, 1986 Page 2 park area located in Tract 6 per the general layout which has been submitted. The inclusion of the tennis court in Tract 6 will provide a more complete neighborhood park and allow the entire community to enjoy all the recreational amenities. Your consideration and approval of these proposed amendments is greatly appreciated. ;7C1i~ C. Philip Wallis Senior Vice President CPQ/pag AS OAINAllY S(JBM/~ED e e LAND USE TABLE LAND USE TABLE REVISED LAND USE INTENSITY LAND USE INTENSITY GROSS GROSS GROSS GROSS TRACT I ANO USE ACRES DU DUlAC ACRES I TRACT I AND USE ACRES DU DUlAC ACRES I 1 S'ngle "ami Iy (SF) 8.1 28 3.46 26.6 13.97 1 S'ngle "amily (SF) 8.1 27 3 33 26.6 13.97 2 Single Family (SF) 18.5 41 2.5~ 2 Single Family (SF) 18.5 48 2 59 3 Townhouses (TH) 10.0 16 1.60 20.5 10.71 3 Townhouses (TH) 10.0 16 1.60 20.5 10.11 4 Townhouses (TH) 10.5 91 9.24 4 Townhouses (TH) 10.5 97 9.24 5 Garden Apartmentsl 5 Garden Apartmentsl CondominIums 15.2 2lX. 10.0 25.2 13.24 CondomInIums 15.2 187 7 42 25.2 13.24 6 Park 3.1 3.7 1.94 6 Park 3.1 3.7 1.94 1 Patio Homes (PH) 31.0 150 4.05 37.0 19.43 1 Patio Homes (PH) 31.0 111 .,,,"2- 37.0 19.43 8 Lake Z.9 2.9 1.52 8 Lake Z.9 2.9 1.52 9 Conservation 34.6 9 Conservation 34.6 10 Conservation 8.8 59.3 31.15 10 Conservation 8.8 59.3 31.15 11 Conservation 15.9 11 Conserv.1tion 15.9 12 Spine Road 6.5 6.5 3.41 12 Spine Road 6.5 6.5 3.41 1] Infiltration Are~ 8./ 8.1 4.57 13 Infiltration Area 8./ 8.1 4.57 TOTAL 190.4 iISO 3.4\ 190.4 100.00 TOTAL 190.4 cDOc;. 3.\~ 190.4 100.00 NOT[; TrJct,> 3, 4, 5 ..nd 1 h~ve s('p.1r"l(! ,ICt ive rp.creation areas lot.11 in'] 2.5 NOT[; TrJcls ), 4, 5 .Ind / h"ve sPp.1ral(! "ClIve recreation areas lolal;n'] t.5 acrt~S . acr,~s . 0' I 2f' \' ~ o .. .. ca .c ... .. - ~ ~ ~ ~ .. .a scale: I": 200' INCORPORATEO IlI""6".. "~.f.~,,''''''f-~.CI .,.,.,.........-., A~ ~JA\..r ..."",-. e . ~ l ! . e " ( \ () \ / \ \ , \ ;' \ c=-=~:/ ~~~~~., -~ -------~ , . .... . - CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708 Telephone (305) 327-1800 CITY MANAGER RICHARD ROZANSKY April 12, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR/COMMISSION FROM: CITY MANAGER 0 . \J SUBJECT: MOSQUITO SPRAYING - EQUIPMENT/HOURS e I have been reviewing our mosquito program and will most likely include another spray unit in the fiscal year 86/87 budget. In the mean time, I am of the opinion that we would be more effective spraying in the evening rather than during the daylight hours. We are presently reviewing manning and salary requirements vis-a-vis the availability of funds in the present budget. I visited the areas which are insect prone during darkness on two occasions and feel that we should be trying to control them at night when they are out rather than during daylight hours. T~,.r~', :,' "~~~j:.A~:-:; ',\ ..\~.. ........... .. >>r:....." '4f~.:""~-- ....~. ...... . -. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708 Telephone (305) 327-1800 CITY MANAGER RICHARD ROZANSKY April 1, 1986 MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR/COMMISSIY FROM: CITY MANAGER '\~ SUBJECT: SUNLAKE P On March 20, 1986 I provided you with a copy of a letter dated March 11, 1986 from Mr. Sid Vihlen Jr. regarding Sunlake PUD. e I have subsequently received March 11, 1986 and March 24, 1986 wholesale water for the project. we can or cannot wholesale water two letters from Mr. Vihlen dated in which he is requesting we I can find nothing that states to another governmental agency. While the purchaser appears to want the property in the City, the sellers are obviously not interested. It's apparent what position the County has taken. Consequently, if we wholesale water to the County so that the property may be developed while in the County, one must ask what incentive is there for the owner, or future owner(s), to annex into Winter Springs? If the answer is none, then What incentive is there for Winter Springs to provide water to a development that probably will not come into the City? I'll review this again with the staff and attorney, provide you with input and ask for direction at the April 14, 1986 Commission meeting. cc: Attorney City Clerk Planner Engineer Utility Land Development Commission . . . e Sid Vih1en Jr. 670 Vihlen Rood SanfOl'd, Florida 32771 March 24, 1986 Hr. Richard Rozansky, City I>1ana.ger City of Winter Springs City Hall 1126 s. R. #434 Winter springs, FL 32708 Re: sunlake PUD Water Services Dear Dick: e Again, we have not received the blessing of the owners of record of Sunlake Pli'D to proceed with our effort to annex and zone the proposed developnent and continue to seek authority. I am sure IT\Y recent letter fully explained our position and support of annexation. I woulq request status of your effort to determine our ability to purchase water fram your city for the developrent as.. requested in my 11 1.1arch 1986 letter. Thanks for an innedi.ate reply and again, please be notified of our continued desire to negotiate full services through the annexation and zoning process. ~.~~..'.i " ~~ - ". Sid en, "Ji:~,--- - cc: Cedar Resources, Inc. Kenneth Oswald, Esquire Lundberg-Perlmcm, n~. . - ~...-. _.'@.' , " . if.... ,.~, . < \ .. ;" \. ., ' ~t....">- .. u ~ U MAR 27 1986 CITY of WINTER SPRINGS ". e e . . .~ .. ( {Ltc- EJrJIf't .!. Sid Vihten Jr. 670 Vihlen Rood Sanford, Florida 32771 March 11, 1986 c~ S (0#401 jUk'tPJt _.,- ~. c/c:/P{~' lJIr. Richard Rozansky, City 1-1anager City of Winter Springs City Hall 1126 S.R. #434 winter Springs, FL 32708 p, r;,\ r--.-~ ~-- '1 G~ r~ ~-. 100J~LLijG~ U~OJ 3~~o~~~ ~ Dear Dick: As you know, Cedar Resources, Inc. has an application on file with fees paid for annexation and PUD zoning for Sunlake PUD subject to the city having the ability to serve the developrent all required rrnmicipal services to include water and ~r services. The owners of record through Ken Oswald delivered a letter that stopped progress in negotiating such services and ultimate consideration of annexation and zoitiJ)g. Cedar Resources, Inc., its land planners, consultants and engineers all agree that Winter Springs can best provide services for the property and that this is a loc;rical extension of the rrnmicipal lirni ts. The land lies arrong Winter Springs, Casselberry and Longwood rrnmicipal limits. Seminole County has no utility service within the area and does not intend to extend services at any tine due to the fact that this land is literally an island of Seminole County land arrong these three cities. Officials within Seminole County govermnent in private rreetings have indicated that this parcel is best annexed. Please understand our desire to proceed with the intent of our applications but at this point the owners of record have not granted authority to proceed due to fear that this effort will cause adverse public relations with Seminole County officials and that the zoning status and ability to acquire utilities may be jeopardized. We do not agree because this is a loc;rical annexation to aa;IUire rrnmicipal services wherein the county has no services. This is the sole reason for the theory of city govermnent--to provide nore intense services than cOlmty governrrent which is established to govern and serve nore rural areas. Also, we feel that should we aa;IUire sewer fran your city the county will ultimately be happy because they can then give this capacity to those who really lie within areas that are best served by Seminole County qovermnent. F'urt:henrore, should e I :e - Page 2 County into a posture of maintaining a neighborhood water plant which is against all good utilities planning and operations conduct. Utilities sbJuld be regional in nature for efficient operations on behalf of the custarer--the citizen. As you know, ~ intend to request zoning which is exactly that \Yhich the county approved and details will be the sane, thus, the creditability of that which the county granted will be upheld and moored by the city and the new owner/developer. s The issue at hand is utilities for water and sewer services and who can best serve the property. Also, your police and fire services can provide quicker response t:i.ne for law, fire and rredica1 errergencies. In that ~ are held up for the m:nent I ~uld request that Winter Springs consider the wholesale of water through an inter-local govennrental agreatent with seminole County who will then serve the property and bill the custarers. we ~uld extend lines and do all necessary construction to provide facilities for this system. Again, the best approach is to armex as to all areas of human services for the retail and residential developrent but this approach provides an alternative to consider for the m:::rrent. Please consider this with your city officials and advise. Thank you for your interest in the project and continued cooperation, Dick. I \ \ \Re. SPed. fuJ..l~Y _. . \" .,.1 , ->< . ____ f--- ;-..., ~~' ,~..F_____ si~en, J~ . cc: Cedar Resources, InC. Ellen Lain, Esquire Kenneth oswald, Esquire Lundberg-Per lrnan, Inc. e e . March 30, 1986 ~to: Richard Rozansky, City Manager City of Winter springs Fran: Sid Vihlen, Jr. 670 Vihlen Road Sanford, FL 32771 Re: Sunlake PUD Sewer & Water Capacity Please note the letter fram Hugh W. Harling, Jr., P.E. of Harling, lDcklin & Associates, Inc. indicating the required sewer and water capacity for Sunlak.e PUD. The required water capacity is 202,500 f.p.d. which relates to IT!Y request that winter Springs wholesale water to the project. Please advise the results as soon as possible. Thanks . J tJ(0 r 1)1'- j> ,(,It (j~vV ~ ~ ~/ I'./.ri.,:\,~ \". T~' n.\\1}[[ ~n' t '/". ". I,.", ..' \':1 ' I' 'j ..~": I ;~...~ ..;'" 'j"-, "-'''.::-...3 ,t...... ~ ! ft" . ..1 LlJ ~ ~t:> ~ . APR 1 lS% CITY of WiNTE.R SPRINGS CITY. MANAGER I.V~ t.v ~ ~ ~r1u G Q..-I . ~ -- . . HARLING LOCKLIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS · SURVEYORS · PLANNERS .J Mat"ch 26, 1986 Sid Vihlen, Jr. Cedar Resources, Inc. 5847 San Felipe, Suite 1700 Houston, Texas RE: Sunlake P.U.D. Sewer Capacity Requirement Dear Sid: The multi-family portion of the Sunlake P. U. D. based on the apartment mix shown below will be 140,500 g.p.d. e 238 - 1 bedroom, 1 bath 106 - 2 bedroom, 2 bath 80 - 3 bedroom, 2 bath The water capacity requirement ,will be 202,500 g.p.d. The commercial portion of the P.U.D. will require 35,500 g.p.d. for a total combined sewer capacity of 176,000 g.p.d. Should you have any questions regarding this please call me at your convenience. Sincerely, Hugh W. Harling, Jr., P.E. President de . 850 COURTLAND STREET. ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32804. (305) 629-1061 e e . ~ KENNETH F. OSWALD J~~~~~lID ATTORNEY AT LAW SUITE 110,600 COURTLAND STREET ORLANDO, FLOJUDA 32804 tHY Of vtJHf.R Sp,UKGS tny \\Ml TELEPHONE (305) 647-3738 ... March 4, 1986 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Richard Rozansky City Manager City of Winter Springs 1126 E. State Road 434 Winter Springs, FL 32708 Re: Cedar Resources, Inc. Annexation and Rezoning Applications with the City of winter Springs Dear Mr. Rozansky: This is to advise that my firm represents Elizabeth L. Bush, Nancy J. Freeman, Harold R. Jackson, Jr., Kenneth M. Leffler, Mary W. Leffler and Lila L. Walling who are the owners of a 56 acre tract of real property located in Seminole County, Florida, adjacent and contiguous to the boundaries of the City of Winter Springs. Cedar Resources, Inc. has contracted to purchase my clients' property. We understand that annexation and rezoning applications have recently been filed with your office by Cedar Resources. The purpose of this letter is to advise you as City of Manager of winter Springs that such annexation and rezoning applications were filed without my clients' knowledge, consent or approval and we hereby request that such applications be withdrawn from further consideration by the City of Winter Springs. Very truly yours, ~ ~C:!/~ Kenneth F. Oswald KFO/rm cc: Kenneth M. Leffler Lundberg Perlman, Inc. , \ '! . ;. i b '..':/' t~.~ l... ;._; /.,V , .. I..;:~<J ~. b".AA..~~ C17TcUC ~ ' ") ... 1 hlC L_'" 0.\ 1..1 :U_M} IDIS AM CITY of WINTER SPRINr,~ - .,. SEMINOLE UTILITY COMPANY, INC. 1500 WINTER SPRINGS BOULEVARD WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32708 TELEPHONE: (305) 365-6073 March 21, 1986 City of Winter Springs 1126 E. SR 434 Winter Springs, FL 32708 Attention: Mr. Richard Rozansky City Manager RE: SOUTH BEAR CREEK PARK Dear Mr. Rozansky: Please accept the attached revised plan for South Bear Creek Park. The plan includes the following additions to the existing Dark facility: 1. 25-30 car parking area 2. Approximately 5 acre area cleared of underbrush, leaving all major trees, ground to be grassed or mulched 3. Volley Ball Court 4. 321X241 picnic shelter with tables 5. ,Playground designed for older children, 7-12 years old, to include large multi-activity climbing and gym apparatus, swings and slide 6. At least three picnic areas with tables and bar-b-que pits 7. Professionally designed jogging and exercise path with 12 exercise stations with appropriate equipment 8. 4.5 to 5 acre lake, maximum 20 feet deep 9. Nature path, board walk, and observation area set in nature preserve 10. New access drive to wastewater treatment plant separate from active Park area All park improvements are planned to be completed within 180 days from approval by the City Commission of Winter Springs. incerely, ;: RECEIVED Jay B. Alper SEMINOLE UTIrITY COMPANY, INC. Attachment MAR 2 1 1986 JBA/gb City of \\linter Springs Director or Al.lm;n;stration srAFF REVIEW MEETThlG MINUI'ES Tuesday, March 18, 1986 The neeting was called to order by Director of Administration, Jacqueline Koch. Present were: Jacqueline Koch, Director of Administration Gil Artman, Director of Public Works Ien Kozlov, City Engineer [bug Taylor, Superintendent of Utilities Sam Smith, Building Official Police Orief, Jolm G::>voruhk Fire Chief, O1arles Holzman Jay Alpert, Winter Springs Develop:rrent CoIpOration Tuscawilla Park Site Plan At Sewer Plant - Additions to Park Facilities and Approval of M:uunade lake Excavation to acquire soil for use in PUn Developrrent. Winter Springs Developnent CoIpOration is reqtEsting approval to dig a lake on the sewer plant recreation site, a oorrow pit operation. They are proposing to put in additional recreation facilities, in the passive park area in exchange for the approval to excavate the lake to use the fill in developrrent of the remainder of Tuscawilla. Mr. Alpert gave his presentation. Their intention is to keep a park surrounding the waste water treatnent plant as a buffer. He said what they are asking to do is based on the City Ordinance #64. Winter Springs Developrent CbIpOration needs to m:rre _ before the City Cbnmission to get approval to dig a lake on property within the City of Winter Springs. He stated that this property is owned by the Winter Springs Developrrent CoIpOration and maintained by the Utility Cbrrpany as fer City Ordinance #64; that allor.vs us to have park facilities in Tuscawilla as long as there is non- discriminatory use of all residents of Tuscawilla. They would expand the park facility that currently exists by putting in a picnic shelter of the sane size and nature as those picnic shelters nor.v that are recently placed in Lake Tuscawilla Park. They would be putting in a playground that would be sized and a type of playground for older chilCken; where right nor.v they have a playground for younger children. He stated that they haven't specifically laid out the equiprrent and location, but intend to have a large, older childrens' aparatus such as swingsets, climbing aparatus and other aparatus judged for older children. He also stated that in this aced cileY are plarming bJ put in a professional jogging trail with e:xercise stations and equip- rrent along a mulch path around the lake. South of the lake they will put nature trails and l:oardwalks and a path, and a raised walkway and also a gazebo and leave it natural for people to walk and mnmune with nature. The current entrance to the wastewater plant \\Quld be closed and a parking area created With 28 spaces, stablized with clay or linerock mvered with mulch or pine straw~ A new access into the sew:!r treatnent plant to the west of the active park area will be mnstructed so vehicles gOing into the sewer treatnent plant would not interfere with the people using the park . Koch asked whether or not the Staff finds this remrrr.endable to the O:>rrmission be- fore the developers are required to <b anyrrore elal:orate engineering since there will be plans required for the developrrent. She stated that this cbes not mnstitute an anendnent to the final developrrent plan, but it cbes need to go to ~ City Conmission. Kozlov asked if the developers were going to discharge any sto:rnwater into the lake, and if there was anything related to the sew:!r plant that is going to be associated with this lake, for the remrd. Alpert answered no, ti)at tilis park is basically unusable woods, and that this is a way for Winter Springs I:evelopnent CoIpOration and the residents both to get sorre benefit from this property. Staff :review M:eting MLmites March 18, 1986 Page 2 Kozlov asked the depth of the lake. Alpert stated it will have to be deep enough to be maintainable because shallow laJe s bec:orre slop holes. He stated that the boring that they have done, that the bottom of the lake (at the center) will vary because of the type of soils they will oone in oontact with but it should be 8' to 10' depth minimum. Kozlov asked if there will be fishing and boating. Alpert stated it WJuld just be for fishing. Koch stated that bascially what the developer is asking for is a trade-off; they need fill dirt and in exchange they are offering additional park facilities. She asked about the quality of the land, SW-aITp or a wet area. Alpert stated no, that this area is not located in a wet or SW-aIYp area, and that there are no seasonal creeks. Artman asked what kind of trees are in this area. Alpert stated nostly pine and small oak, and serre palnetto and palms. There will be a buffer of 50 feet from the wastewater treatnent plant . Kozlov asked are there spray fields anywhere near this property. Alpert stated no that the spray fields are on the golf oourse. Koch asked if there would be any odor from the treatrrent plant. Alpert stated that the plant does not produce any oCbr and the ponds do not produce any odor. He stated that within the treatnent plant there are sludge drying beds and there is always sane odor. He doesn't think that this will have any effect on the park. Koch asked about the maintenance of tffi park. Alpert stated the park facility will be owned and maintained by the utility Cbrrpany. The utility Cbrrpany is ooncemed that a buffer be maintained around its facility. Koch stated that the City WJuld like to have serrething in writing oorrmitting the utility Conpany to maintain the park facilities after Winter Springs Ieveloprrent Corporation is gone. Alpert stated that as long as the utility Cbrrpany is in operation, the developed park facilities will be maintained by the utility Cbnpany. He also stated that they WJuld be nore than happy to guarantee that any resolution made oonceming owner- ship of the other parks in Tuscawilla WJuld include this park. He also stated that the developers WJuld love to let the City have the park. Smith asked if the park will be lighted and have bathroom facilities. Alpert stated that it will be a dayti.ne park, and there are no bathroom facilities plarmed. Smith asked the acreage of the park. Alpert stated that there is approximately ~ acres in the lake area, and is about 800 feet from the street to the lake. Koch stated that it would be a good idea to have a water fountain. Alpert stated that this WJuld not be a problem and stated that they will do the best they can to make a natural park, and that the parking will fit in and around the trees. Koch asked if the Staff requires any nore information and whether they reocmrend this or reoormend against this. O1.i.ef Q:>voruhk made the notion to reoonurend to the City Manager to approve the reqlEst. Seconded by Kozlov. Vote: All Aye. M:>tion carried. .~->_~":l.-.~ 1.. . . ,..,'~\NTEi'I", ,"cf ~"~~" :;~ (..rP'"',,<, \". ;u f . tf) ~ ~, . . \ }.: . '~~~"::~:::/ " .~ CITY OF WINTf1~GS. FWRlDA 3 \?-1/l'0 1126 STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708 Telephone (305) 327-1800 March 21, 1986 To: Ci ty Manager Subject: Request of Winter Springs Development Corp. for Approval to Rerrove Soil for Use as Fill in Tuscawilla Attached is a map of the area involved in the referenced request, showing the proposed lake frem which Winter Springs Development Corp. wishes to generate soil for use in development of the remainder of Tuscawilla. In exchange they offer additional recreational facilities beyond those now required in the sewer plant park as part of the PUD Master Plan. Staff ccmnents on the proposal are attached. ~A<LL.d+~~ ~que~ne Koch Director of Administration -.-" ! ~ \ . "~""TMaNT8 .IN.La PAMILV ..p. .~J'_~ ~~'\~~ fA ~ ~ \ " ,-.. '-=''''<~:i;l' ~ ~.\ l' .'-...........4. "-1';- ',' .. ,-; l ~ ~ ..~ ;~; , , CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA I' '. so' " " i : f',~ , _, ,..-. 1126 STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708 Telephone (305) 327,1800 April 4, 1986 Mr. Jay Alpert Winter Springs Development Corporation 1500 Winter Springs Boulevard Winter Springs, Florida 32708 Dear Mr. Alpert: In reference to the request of Winter Springs Development Corporation for authorization to remove soil from a portion of the sewer plant site south of Winter Springs Boulevard, the City Commission approved the request, including recommendations from Staff, (attached) including all the amenities (as listed in your letter to City Manager Richard Rozansky dated March 21, 1986) and the comments made at the meeting which include: 1. Your guarantee to provide potable water to the site. 2. A 4-1 slope from the top of the berm down as far as it goes 20 ft. horizontally into the lake, after that it will be a 3-1 slope. 3. The dirt is to be used to expand the wastewater treatment facility and on Tuscawilla Unit 14B. 4. You will accept responsibility for the streets, and will clean up any dirt that is dropped on the streets. In addition: 1. 180 day completion time. 2. No work on Sundays. 3. No trucks on premises after 5:00 p. m. 4. Hours of work on other days will be from 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 5. Repair and clean any damage to the roads. If you agree to all the above and attachments, please sign below and return to this office. ~ // .",,- JAY ALPERT, WINTER SPRINGS ~ JOHN DEVELOPMENT CORP. ( I PERMISSION WAS GRANTED B~ Y COMMISSION MARCH 24, 1986.