HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986 02 24 Regular
- - -,~\NTEA
, ~"' ;...':::~~':-':-.<:\
., - .
~ '- :
",
,'~
;;.f ~t I kb
CITY <w WIXTER SPRIN<JS, FLORIDA
1126 STAn: ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708
Telephone (305) 327 -1800
February 20, 1986
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jackie Koch
/
FROM: City Engineer
I
( /
L...
SUBJECT: Mt. Greenwood/Tract 3 & 4
All appropriate engineering has been received
and reviewed and found to be satisfactory. It is
recommended that the final engineering be approved
by the City Commission.
cc: City Manager
Building Department
--'
-...-
Staff leview J.Eeting
Tuesday, February 4, 1986
'll1e rceeting was called to order by Ieanard Kozlov, City Engineer.
PRESENT :
PRESENT srAFF:
ley M:ilane, Bowyer-Singleton
Larry Hughes, Bowyer-Singleton
Rick Lenbrick, ArreriFirst Developnent Cm:p.
Phil Wallis, ArreriFirst Developnent Corp.
Dennis R. Quinn, ArreriFirst Developrrent Co:rp.
Dave Snead, Bowyer-Singleton
Phil Bishop, Bowyer-Singleton
Leonard Kozlov, City Engineer
John Govoruhk, Police Clief
roug Taylor, Superintendent WSWS
Chuck Holzman, Fire Chief
Gil Art:m3n, Director of Public WJrks
MI'. GREEM\OJD TRACKS 3 & 4:
The City Engineer's letter dated January 22, 1986 was reviewed.
1. Depa.rt::Irent of Envirorurental legulations penni ts. Rey M:ilane stated that the DER
pennit applications will be submitted today. Ien Kozlov said that he would like to
get a <X>py of the approved signed pennit once it has been issued. He also asked that
Bowyer-Singleton respond to his letter in writing.
2. Len Kozlov stated that he was oonfused because sone things were put on the drawing
saying there were existing and sane were not existing yet there is nothing there. Dave
- Snead stated that he added a note saying that the features showing as existing are in-
tended to be existing by the tine Tracks 3 & 4 get started; and the infrastructure will
be in place at that tirre.
3. Dave Snead stated that they will fumish seven (7) sets of signed, sealed, and dated
plans.
4. Concerns about calculations for post-peak storrrwater discharges. ReyM:ilane stated
that this will probably answer #6 & #7 also. He stated that there is a rraster lake
system which was built under the infrastructure. ~st of the baseball field is a natural
depression wlrich will be left in its existing oondition and used for storrnNater detention,
and it will be oonsidered the naster lake system. ley Malane said that these are retention
detention ponds. They have been approved by St. Johns Water Managerrent District for
oonstruction and operation. In the design of the lake systems the CN that was used for
post developrent land uses. When the naster lake system is built it is already designed
to take into oonsideration that there will be patio hones on Tract 7. So, all they need
to do in the developnent for each parcel will be just to connect into the lake system.
7. Cbncem on the irrpacts that it nay have off site to No Narre Creek. ley Malane stated
that they have inoorporated a wall which is the oontrol structure in Tract 10. The
system has been designed to irrprove or equal the cx:nditions that occur downstream. Len
Kozlov stated that the nain ooncem is the oonoentration of a lot of water going into
the No Narre Creek not knowing ~ther all this water that is going to be carried off from
detention 10 historically went into NO Narre Creek. This is going to be a problem because
a lot of water is being funneled into one area, and there are people living in the
imrediate area, oone probably living below the 100 year flood. ley Malane stated that
they \Ere cxmoeD1ed about the house on the oomer next to the culvert. He stated that
they did not want to increase flood stages, they analyzed the 100 year stonn, and what-
ever was going to Tract 10 would be cnly the predeveloprrent base. The predeveloprrent
area is equal to the post developnent area. '!hey will increase the total runoff because
to irrprove the area. Ray Malane stated that they are 100% sure that there will be no
Staff Review M:eting
Tuesday, February 4, 19 86
Page 2
nore inpact than there are currently. And he is willing to put this staterrent in writing.
8. !en Kozlov stated that this would be a lot better to get fire engines and a little
larger vehicle in. Dave Snead stated that they have no problems with this.
9. Dave Snead stated that the di.rrensions are on the two sheets showing the two 12' lanes
to be built.
10. Dave Snead stated that the sidewalks fran the units to the parking areas will be
constructed by the builcer. The preliminary plans that was su1:mitted they proposed
bringing the sidewalks to individual tmits from the parking areas. Sidewalks will go
along the roads just on the infrastructures. Sidewalks will be provided as expected on
all the public streetsin the right-of-way. '!he snaller streets are going to be private
roads. CX1ly the infrastructure will be dedicated to the City. The streets serving
the single-family in 1 and 2 will be public, the main road is public, and tb= street
serving the patio lots. Tracts 3, 4 and 5 are private roads. Tracts 1, 2 and 7 will
have sicewalks.
11. CX1 the typical fire hydrant detail, Dave Snead stated that they added a thrust block
for the retaining gland.
12 . '!he concern over the 4' water main. Dave Snead stated that they do have calculations
to prove that it does rreet the flaw demands.
-
Len Kozlov stated that he will review the respcnses and if everything seems to be fine,
he will s1..ll:::lnit a letter to Bowyer-Singleton indicating that what he finds for 3 and 4
to be satisfacto:ry if it is. If there are any additional glEstions, he will contact
by letter.
Gil Artm3.n stated that as a result of demucking and a few other problems, there has been
SOnE thinning in SOnE of the forested areas plus the buffer zone along Hayes !bad. With
the heavy demucking there will be additional tree damage in that area and serre considera-
tion soould be put into the point system in the Al:bor Ordinance that soould be corrplied
with.
John Cbvoruhk stated that he has not seen the drawing for the striping of the lanes on
M:>ss !bad.
Len Kozlov e~1ained that the next procedure after his review of the final engineering
of Mt. Greenwood Tract 3 & 4 is the approval by the City Cbmnission.
Len Kozlov advised ley Malane that he would like to get a copy of the signed pennit fran
DER.
,-
Ibug Taylor stated that the DER pennit application needs to corre to his office and then
he will cxx:>rdinate signatures with the City Mmager.
Respectfully submitted,
rJ1n~aJZ~J J~
Mary W.ls
Secre
~
AMERIFIRsr
.
?)A\~
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
85] Trafalgar COUr1, Suite 208
Maitland, Flonda 3275]
February 24, 1986
Ms. Jacqueline Koch
City Planner
City of Winter Springs
1126 State Road 434
Winter Springs, Florida 32708
Re: Mount Greenwood
Tracts 3, 4 and 5
Dear Ms. Koch:
The referenced tracts within the Mount Greewood PUD are proposed
for development as fee simple attached townhouses. These sub-
divisions will have private streets with adjacent off street
parking facilities as shown on the engineering plans for these
tracts. These streets and parking facilities will be a part
-- of the limited common properties in these subdivisions and
will be owned and maintained by the appropriate homeowners
associations.
AmeriFirst Development Corporation, therefore, respectfully,
requests a waiver of the right-of-way requirements under the
design/construction standards per Section 14-95 (private
streets) of the City of Winter Springs, Florida Land Development
Regulations.
Should you have any questions on this matter or need additional
information, please advise.
;nA::4 WJO \
C. Philip Wall~
Senior Vice President
CPW/klb
It,jf'phont' C~(I:)) 6()O-2777
~R~''',#
Rft)';
't.. '." .,;'
~. .,-
~'~'...~""
-....~--s?-.
,
1-- ') ~ Oh F I I, _ E
~ ------"'0 r-=:---w
' ~u (~'\' I, ".
r'/; \ } ~-.~ -~../
_.' , ,'., / '
-- -.~.. .... . . - . J
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA
1126 STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708
Telephone (305) 327,1800
February 11, 1986
Mr. Lucius J. Cushman Jr. P.E.
Dyer, Riddle, Mills & Precourt Inc.
1505 East Colonial Drive
Orlando, Florida 32803
RE: St. Stephan's Catholic Church
Response on Review Comments on
Final Engineering.
Dear Mr. Cushman:
Your revised engineering drawings and comment
response was received on February 11, 1986. In a meeting
with you and Steven Marquart P.E. the engineering was
reviewed and found to be satisfactory for this project.
I am recommending to the City Commission the approval
of the final engineering.
LTK/jds
cc:
City Manager
Public Works Dept.
Building Dept.
Fire Chief
Police Chief
Staff Meetinq February 11 at 9 AM:
All departments expressed approval
of the Final Engineerinq of this
development. JK
"-'~\NTE~" ,
,cj ~',
,,~~.,.,......, '-,'.'
......... .. ~ ,YI'
.. () . \l,
" i .
:.", .', J,
of~. ~ .,/ ~ "
,'. ... '...un.O...<flI~
. : .~'<:~ t "-("J'.,~ _ -"..
.\, :1 ~_".... ~
~?~/rb
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
1126 STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708
Telephone (305) 327,1800
February 21, 1986
MEMORANDUM
TO:Jackie Koch, City Planner
FROM: City Engineer
~.-. .
L------
\,
SUBJECT: Tuscawilla Unit 14-B
The revised final engineering was received on February
20, 1986. The review of this engineering resolved all
issues except one and another item of note.
Item 14 of my letter dated January 28, 1986 to
Charles True P.E. and my second letter to Jay Alpert
Item 11 dated February 7, 1986 requested that the retention
pond have a slope of 4:1 or shallower. The revised
final engineering dated February 20, 1986 ignored this
request. The City of Winter Springs has adopted DER
rulel7-25 Florida Administrative Code by reference via
Section 14-122i Land Development Code.
The DER did issue a general permit for the stormwater
system, but due to an oversight of the permit reviewer,
allowed a 3:1 slope to remain in the design. This conversation
was confirmed by Mrs. Juanita Clem, DER office in Orlando.
The following are recommendations that can be evaluated
with regard to this issue:
1. Require the developers of Unit 14-B, Mr. Jay
Alpert, Winter Springs Development Co. to install slopes
at 4:1 or shallower.
2. Require the developer to install fences around the
ponds with the present slope design.
3. Give a variance to allow a 3:1 on all retention
ponds.
The slope issue deals with safety. The shallower
the slope, the easier it is for someone to get out of
the pond.
The other item of note is in regard to the location
of the large retention pond in the wetlands of Bear
Creek.
If the ownership of the retention ponds are going
to be transferred now or in the future to the City,
it will be necessary for the developer of Unit 14-B
to obtain a letter, dredge fill permit or other document
of approval or a statement of no jurisdiction from the
DER for installing retention pond berms in the Wetland
areas of Bear Creek so as to allievate or remove any
potential liability for the City.
cc: City Manager
Public Works Director
Building Department
, 1f .
---
,
'",
-- Regular Meeting, City Commission, April 24, 1984
Page 3
83-84-14
Recommendation of the Planning/Zoning Board:
Preliminary Plan (existing Tusc. PUD), Tuscawil1a Unit 14:
Manager Rozansky said this has been discussed at length; the Applicant is present. The
City Planner discussed the eight conditions from the Staff Report dated Feb. 24, 1984.
Commissioner Grove said she would like to clarify a statement the Mayor made. He said
of the residents of Tuscawi1la that were here, 99% were against and 1% in favor of.
She said she would give the residents of Tuscawilla that were in attendance, maybe 99%
against and 1% in favor of, but Commissioner Grove said she did not think that is
representative of the population of Tuscawilla.
Motion was made by Commissioner Linville to approve the residential portion of Tuscawi1la
Unit 14 only, and hold off again on the road going through to Oviedo. Motion failed
for lack of a second.
Mr. Jay Alpert, Winter Springs Development Corp., spoke in reference to the road and
their traffic study.
Motion was made by Commissioner Hartman to approve the preliminary plan of Tuscawilla
Unit 14 as submitted with the recommendations of Staff and the Planning & Zoning Board
with the exception of Staff Recommendation No.4, seconded by Commissioner Grove for
discussion. There was discussion of Condition No. 5 of the Staff Report, dated 2/24/84.
,.-,
Motion was amended by Commissioner Hartman, seconded by Commissioner Jacobs, that
Winter Springs Development Corp. would put in a dirt road (Vistawilla Drive) northward
to S. R. 419 within 90 days after receipt of their railroad crossing permit and pave
the road after two years of receipt of their permit. Discussion. There was discussion
of repairs to Winter Springs Boulevard. Mr. Charles True and Roy Dye of Winter
Springs Development Corp., spoke about repairs to the Boulevard and said if the
deficiency in the road was caused by the Utility Company, they would go in and repair
it. Mr. Troy Piland spoke in discussion.
1
Mr. Jay Alpert of Winter Springs Development Corp. said they had a long standing
committement that when a signal is needed at Tuscawilla Road and Winter Springs
Boulevard, that signal would be provided by the Development Company. He said they are
also certain that when they go through to SR 426 that DOT will require a signal there.
Vote on the motion as amended: Commissioner Jacobs, aye; Commissioner Grove, aye;
Commissioner Hartman, aye; Commissioner Adkins, aye; Commissioner Linville, no; motion
carried.
Rezonin /Amendment to the Land Use Plan, RC-I to Planned Unit Develo ment, ADANAC:
Motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs to set the Public Hearing for ADANAC for May
22, 1984. Seconded by Commissioner Grove. Discussion. Vote on the motion: Commissioner
Grove, aye; Commissioner Hartman, aye; Commissioner Adkins, aye; Commissioner Linville,
aye; Commissioner Jacobs, aye; motion carried.
Amendment to PUD Preliminary Plan, Winter Springs Commerce Center - Dittmer:
The City Planner explained that the Applicant is asking for approval of his concept to
amend the physical design of his development and to change the land use in one area
from duplexes to offices. The Staff finds the plans are approvable subject to five
conditions in the Staff Review of March 15, 1984 (attached to original minutes).
,I.
~ce product, a4~.~~~' JOB 'rASIS: S.rt -Of .~:*'l~D' '~4, Board..
~: LaD4. DevelopmeDt, ZoIl1Da: , ' , ' . ,
/1homa. Elwell, CI'1'Y PLAnD, CIT! or lfu..rD ~.IJG8, FLORIDA.
STA1? RIPOlfr. PLAnIla'!!!!I. '9!. OJU)IR/~: 84~2t1t2 I, 24 FD~. 84
DevelopmeDt/UAit: TUSCAWILLA/UNIT 14
Applicant/Agent: WINTER SPRINGS DEVELOPMENT CORP./J.ALPERT'
leT1ev/ActiOD l~que.te4: CITY COMMISSION REVIEW/APPROVAL
SUBDIVISION, PRELIMINARY PLAR (POO) , ,
leport Tezt, Peee 1.
A..elmeDt/
ValidatIon
To: CITY MANAGER/Rozansky t and all parties who may become identi fied relevan
to the above identified request for re~iew!actiont
Re: STAFF REVIEW-for action toward approval of the above identified develop-
ment.
.~
From: CITY PLANNER/Elwell (sign! date) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
THE PLANNING/ZONING BD. RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT (IDENTIFIED)
SUBJECT TO THE FINDINGS OF FURTHER STAFF REVIEW (REFER: MINUTES OF PLA~INGI
ZONING BD. MEETING 22 FEB. 84. IN PROGRESS), AND;
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE. THE STAFF HAS COMPLETED ITS REVIEW IN CONSULTATION WITH
THE APPLICANT (MEETING OF 24 FEB. 84) AND FINDS THE FOLLOWING REMAINING CON-
"r DITIONS FOR APPROVAL OF THE IDENTIFIED DEVELOPMENT: ?
~ -
01. THE APPLICANT SHALL DEDICATE THE ACCESS RIGHTS TO FOR THE
.....,.... . ~~Jllt6RIrA_ l18li8 ~ JJ1tM "i~ ...-....e ........'4.J. l' - .-
02. PHASED DEVELOPMENT. AS IT MAY BE PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT SHALL BE
REVIEWED FOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY PRIOR TO PLATTING. AND;
03. THE UNDES I GNAT ED TRACT FRONTING VISTAWILLA DRIVE SHALL BE DES IGNATED
"CONSERVATION. GREEN BELT." WITH OWNERSHIP RETAINED BY THE APPLICANT. AND
04. THE APPLICANT SHALt. END WINTER SPRINGS DRIVE. FOR SOME DISTANCE TO BE
DETER}lINED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, SHORT OF
THE OVIEDO CITY LIMIT t AND;
05. THE APPLICANT SHALL EXTEND VISTAWILLA DRIVE NORTHWARD TO S.R. 419, IN
'.., 'AI
- 'ACO' ""!An'SnC'f'O'RT"''l'O Tft''"''C'm' Or"UHlk
AND AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL OF THE DEVELOPMENI (IDENTIFIED). AND:
06. THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE A BUFFER AREA BETWEEN THE COMMERCIAL AND
RESIDENTIAL AREA (LOTS 1.336) OF A DESIGN AND OTHERWISE TO THE SATIS-
FACTION OF THE CITY t AND
07. THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL OTHERWISE MEET THE REQUIREMENT~ OF THE CITY CODES.
t
r-
. )
08. THE APPLICANT SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY ENGINEER
(SPECIFIED. MmI) OF 15 FEB. 84 t ATTACHED).
WTE/mn
Attachments: attached; ~
File (identified),
City Commission,
.1,"
cc:'
. - ~\NTEA' , .
..cj~~"
:t{ I',,,,~-.., ( <'\1'
. U . "I
.: ; j
'. . \ /
"" :~'~':,":~::
"
)/'21/(&
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
1126 STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708
Telephone (305) 327-1800
February 22,1986
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jackie Koch, City Planner
. ~.-//
FROM: City Engineer /1
I -
SUBJECT: Tuscawilla Unit 14-A
Revised "As Built" engineering drawings have been reviewed.
After reviewing these drawings, it has been found satisfactory.
,-
There is one issue that must be noted. The large retention
pond behind lots 129 through 133 is located in the wetlands
of Bear Creek. If it is planned for the City to take ownership
of this retention pond at this time or in the future, it
would be necessary for the developer, Winter Springs Development
Corp. to obtain from the D.E.R. a letter, dredge & fill permit
or some document giving approval or a statement of no jurisdiction
to install retention pond berms in this wetland area so as
to allievate or remove any potential liability for the City.
cc: City Manager
Public Works Director
Building Department
tile toe/(
-- ;!l~i(T)tld /J/reeiDr - {jj/"z~s, ;/7SfCme
~e 0( (j(S()I4~ AlMJ1ttlf1 ullf5e
mrkJ /;1 S Y01rs wrl/r
r?fj(J-;ofta/1; d/~rb~cI Me!
CheJ1iIC/{/!y depeJrenI adoh7eds, r
1 I11Y (~fare(1 J;lHce ~ /ksc &t~~!)
- Gaf!h tr [/ilrJf11efl oj 7(6 I/; fl5
()/!e;~ .
/Mo a alfYAll-ttn1 ~ Vte i!a!}lJ /
aee!~ J1tffJ1eJ ~ Wb; Wio OF
~ c/ktleriUn V~.
--
?-- \12 ~ I pc,
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
CITY MANAGER
RICHARD ROZANSKY
1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708
Telephone (305) 327-1800
February 24, 1986
MEMORANDUM
TO: COMMISSION/ MAYOR
FROM: CITY MANAGER ~
SUBJECT: Drainage Problems-Oak Forest Homeowner's Association
(Chokecherry/Square) - Letter/Petition dated
February 9, 1986
--
The City Engineer and Director of Public Works
have visited the area, researched the matter at the
county, and provided me with this attached letter which
I am forwarding on to you for your information.
If possible I'll have the engineer sit down with
Mr. Hartman and a representative of the homeowners association
and attempt to work out and implement a solution.
RR/jds
Attachment:
cc: City Building Dept.
City Chief of Police
City Public Works Dept.
City Engineer
Homeowners Association
,,-
.... ~.'~ .. .
~' '-.jO\NTE~' , ,
~'cj .s..;',
'F'"
-~ ~.'''- ~',
"' \ '
~ (J . );
. ,
. .~, ~ .
'... " ./ .,:'
", ~~'~;;~":~:: ~ ,,'
i-!2ff(,
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
1126 STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708
Telephone (305) 327,1800
February 14, 1986
MEMORANDUM
TO: CI'IY tJANAGLR
//
1/ _''_"--
, 0." r........------
. ,L.-- y/
(/
l
i
FROM: CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: Street Resurfacing and Paving Bids
Three bids were received for the resurfacing of certain designated
City streets that were presented and opened on February 13, 1986.
The lowest of the three bids to resurfacing certain City streets and
replace the base material on a section of Mockingbird Lane is Mac Asphalt,
a Division of APAC of Florida, Inc. with a total bid sum of $89,482.50.
I recommend that the City Commission accept that low bid of $89,482.50
from Mac Asphalt, Inc. to do the designated resurfacing road work.
All three bids are attached.
1l> '. C&UM I ~~"tdl
Pre- . - Qa- '1 fLkriL.
(Z.:=- ~)uJ",t(? ~ ~
t.t 0 '<
d C:t-, t.J T 10
Mt9c A,~~r h c. ~
~l(..
1t"
gq,4 8 2'.~O
v'
~
r
, .
"
~\s~ r&
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708
Telephone (305) 327-1800
CITY MANAGER
RICHARD ROZANSKY
February 24, 1986
MEMORANDUM
TO: COMMISSION/MAYOR
FROM: CITY MANAGER ~
SUBJECT: OAK FOREST ENTRANCE SIGN LIGHT(Petition from
homeowners)
I had the City Clerk research this matter and we
did discuss it at a City Commission meeting, however,
it was not resolved one way or another.
Generally, a City does not provide lighting of
the nature requested by the petition. Special landscape
lighting is certainly above the level of lighting normally
provided by municipalities and is handled by private
land owners and/or homeowners associations.
I do not believe that the City can install special
lighting and then place it on a tax roll (like a special
lighting district). Consequently the City would have
to pay for the lighting or the homeowners association
make some special arrangement with a near by property
owner.
RR/jds
cc: Building Department
Chief of Police
Homeowners Association
Public Works Department
:L11~/tb
~/
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
11 26 EAST STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708
Telephone (305) 327-1 800
CITY MANAGER
RICHARD ROZANSKY
February 24, 1986
MEMORANDUM
TO: COMMISSION/MAYOR
FROM: CITY MANAGER ~
~?
,,/:/
SUBJECT: Petition Ranchlands Homeowner's Association
Row Clean-up, etc.
In regards to the letter you received from Mr.
Darwin on January 22, 1986 with attached petition I
have scheduled a meeting with the homeowners and will
let you know what problems we can satisfy and cannot
satisfy as a staff.
The meeting is scheduled for February 25, 1986.
RR/jds
cc: City Police Department
City Fire Department
City Public Works Department
........
~~~\NTE~~'t z
f':tJ~~"
!'... ~.."" '-'9~>
(0 ,'I/>'
" . :
.;.. .'lt~ ~ '"
~. . ,.
't~t- + - .'. ~/
:-, "'I~co..""" -:..;"'f
~:x:s:,;,;:::",::"4"."""
?-- ?-tlt~
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
1126 STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708
Telephone (305) 327,1800
February 24, 1986
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager
FROM: City Engineer
/~'
1;~
SUBJECT: Inspection on Choke Cherry Drive-Oak Forest
II - Lot filling and drainage
An inspection was made on February 13, 1986 of
Lots 203 & 204 that have been recently filled by Hartman
and Son. Approximately two to three feet of fill material
have been placed on the properties. Standing water
was noted to exist behind these lots and the adjacent
lots.
Inspection of the area noted that there was no
relief for this water. One possible solution would
be for Mr. Hartman to install an 8" PVC pipe from the
backside of his property to the corner catch basin to
provide a relief for water, but due to the fact that
the catch basin is on about 18 to 24 " deep, a head
of water at the property backside will be able to relieve
this water. Bear in mind the rear area will not be
drained, but will provide a relief outlet.
Mr. Hartman would have to obtain permission from
the City to tap into the catch basin.
cc: Public Works Director
LTK/jds
fiLE 0
COPIES TO THE FOLLOWING:
CITY CLERK 0 COMM.
CITY PLANNER 0 MAYOR
CITY ENGINEER ~DING
CHIEF POLICE IErFINANCE
CHIEF FIRE DEPT. 0 PERS~D
PUBLIC WORKS I2r
THROW AWAY 0
RETURN ~
COM:lETED ON:c:2_ :l-f-?6
~~~~IlW~@
fEB 24 1986
au filMIER SPRIflGa
an "~R'UDrf
,"'-
1 '2~\~~
TO: CITY MANAGER
FROM: John Govoruhk, Chief of Police
DATE: February 24, 1986
SUBJ: PUBLIC INPUT
REF: CITY COMMISSION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 10, 1986
This is to adise that Mr. Tom Dougherty's statement in reference to a
violation of the fence law, that was brought before the Code Enforcement
Board ( which he was a member) was not in violation of the Code Board
instructions as he, Mr. Dougherty stated, the fence was down.
Mr. George Weigle's statement in regards to Greenbriar signs:
..-'
1. The signs are on Greenbriar's property.
,-
2. At the time, they did not have a permit from the building
department, but as of this date, have obtained one and
therefore are in compliance of City Ordinance.
/ (.;'/
, /:/
>ft:.~' , )// /,
~'" /, -, - " ',-J\,? L/
/'{fo n 6vo~uH1t /
/ Ch --Of Police
!
-ru ~ Q.(:),,-~ \ ~'A'\oL
~~ "'\\)U~ \ Y0~D
~\ ~ .:L\ ~A \ ~(p
.
"
85-86-10
,
REGULAR MEETING
CITY COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 10, 1986
\
The Regular Meeting of the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs. Florida, was
called to order by Mayor John V. Torcaso at 7:30 p. m.
Roll Call:
Mayor John V. Torcaso, present
Deputy Mayor William A. Jacobs, present
City Manager Richard Rozansky, present
City Attorney Frank Kruppenbacher, present
Commissioners:
Cindy Kaehler. present
Arthur Hoffmann, present
Philip A. Kulbes, present
Martin Trencher, present
For the invocation Deputy Mayor William A. Jacobs asked for a moment of silent prayer.
The pledge of allegiance to the flag was led by Commissioner Cindy Kaehler.
Motion was made by Commissioner Hoffmann to approve the minutes of January 27, 1986.
Seconded by Commissioner Trencher. Discussion. Vote on the motion: Commissioner
Hoffmann, aye; Commissioner Kulbes, aye; Commissioner Jacobs, aye; Commissioner'
Trencher, aye; Commissioner Kaehler, aye; motion carried.
Public Input:
Former City Commissioner Leanne Grove was presented a plaque of appreciation from the
Council of Local Governments in Seminole County by Mayor Torcaso.
Mr. Tom Dougherty, Chokecherry Drive, spoke about problems in the Oak Forest area.
He spoke about a petition that was presented to the City and to date has not received
a reply; spoke about a violation of the fence law that was brought before the Code
Enforcement Board; a dedicated park area that is under water; water that is flowing
into Little Lake Howell by a development that is outside the City; and he spoke about
a fence problem that was brought to the Code Enforcement Board. Mayor Torcaso presented
a Resolution of appreciation to Mr. Dougherty for his service on the Code Board.
Mrs. Helen Powell, Hacienda Village, spoke about the Hearing for Peter Cowell.
Jay Hamilton, Turkey Hollow Circle, spoke about the problems with the Jacobson wall.
Philip St. Laurent, Chokecherry Drive, spoke about the property directly across the
street from him that is owned by Mr. Hartman, and asked for a dead tree to be removed.
Mr. William Moore, Chokecherry Drive, spoke about drainage problems.
Jim Hartman, former City Commissioner, spoke about the property he purchased.
Bob Gray, Chokecherry Drive, presented a petition to the Commission.
George Weigle, NOrthern Way, spoke about two billboards Greenbriar has on Northern Way
and asked that Greenbriar be told to relocate them onto Greenbriar property.
Gene Dorman, Northern Way. inquired about the Imara lawsuit appeal.
General Agenda:
Public Hearing for Ord. No. 326-east 200 ft. of Lots 17 and 18. Springs Hammock
Replat, according to the plat thereof as recorded in P. B. 7. Pg. 96. P.R: of
Seminole Co.,FL etc. (Dittmer) Second Reading:
Due to changes in the law, the ordinance will be on the Agenda for the next meeting
for first reading.
.--
,.^~_...._--"~--- ^.-
SPECIAL MEETING
CITY COMMISSION
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 21, 1986
85-86-10
The Special Meeting of the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida
was called to order by Mayor John V. Torcaso.
Roll Call:
Mayor John V. Torcaso, present
Deputy Mayor William A. Jacobs, present
City Manager Richard Rozansky, present
City Attorney Frank Kruppenbacher, present
Attorney Marsha Lippincott, present
Commissioners:
Cindy Kaehler, present
Arthur Hoffmann, present
Philip A. Kulbes, present
Martin Trencher, present
Imara-Appeal:
Attorney Lippincott reported that an Appeal does not give the loser in a lawsuit
the opportunity to begin afresh and have the matter reviewed by different judges
as if the trial judge had never ruled against you. The appellate court is not
permitted to reweigh the testimony. What the appellate court does do is to
consider an appellate's legal challenge to the trial court's decision, keeping in
mind that the presumption is that the trial court ruled correctly.
Attorney Lippincott explained she had made a preliminary review, and based upon her
preliminary review her initial impression was that the City's chances of prevailing
on Appeal were not good.
Attorney Lippincott said she would review this matter, file the notice of appeal
on Monday, (Feb. 24, 1986), and come back to the Commission and give her full
opinion and advice and at that time the City could make their decision whether or
not to Appeal.
Motion was made by Commissioner Jacobs that the City proceed with the Appellant
Attorney and have her report back in one week with her response as to the City's
chances for success or not. Seconded by Commissioner Hoffmann. Discussion. Vote
on the motion: Commissioner Kulbes, aye; Commissioner Jacobs, aye; Commissioner
Trencher, aye;Commissioner Kaehler, aye; Commissioner Hoffmann, aye; motion carried.
Meeting was adjourned 6:30 p. m.
Respectfully submitted,
~r~
Mary T. Norton,
City Clerk
Approved:
y)~
,MAYOR