Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985 10 28 Regular ----- - ~ Conkin, ~ort... ..... Holme. @ [P) ==:"'-:-ffi~fl I ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32801 TEL 305 425-0452 , - _. / September 27, 1985 Mr. Peter Cowell City Planner City of Winter Springs 400 North Edgemon Ave Winter Springs, Fla 32708 REI Oak Forest Unit b CPH Job Number W0402.00 Dear Peter: We have completed the review of the final plan and data submission on Oak Forest, Unit b. We hereby recommend approval based on the following conditions: 1. That underdrains are installed .s recommended by the Soils Consultant. A preliminary location ~or the underdrains has been shown on the plans and in thp. soil report. These locations will be r~evaluated in the field during construction with a report given to the City for review and follow-up. ~ 2. This recommendation is also subject to the standard provisions and requirements in the Cities Subdivision Code, and the permits issued by Florida Department of Environmental Regulations ad the st. John River, Management District for water, sewer and storm drainange. 3. Lots requiring demucking and fill as indicated in the soils report shown on the plans should be inspected by a Soils Consultant during the filling operation to allow certification that the unsuitable soils have been removed and that free draining fill has been properly placed and compacted in the house pad area. 4. The rear lot storm water retention treatment areas shall remain accessable after home construction and sales. Restriction shall be placed on the drainage/access easements to each retention area to insure continued access for maintenance. 5. The gabion basket dewatering system for the retention areas is experimental in application with only limited success in the Central Florida Area. Maintenance of the upstream filter face may be impossible and replacement would be very expensive. We, therefore, recommend that a valved (normally closed) pipe be placed at the bottom of each retention basin to allow emergency drawdown of the stored water for maintenance or as a back up system should the primary system fail. ..- A) The City should consider not taking over the retention area system for maintenance at the end of the normal maintenance bond period, but require an additional 5 year bond for that part of the .y.tem to allow it to prove it.el~ and to develop a functional maintenance record. It it do.sn't work as designed, then it should be replaced with an Corporate Office: 500 W. Fulton St.. P. O. Box 1976. Sanford. FL 32772-1976 ~'~'" "., ,," '~.,;.~~~' Port... ..... Holm.. ~ <;. " , ' ~ fR) ENGINEERS. INC. ~,.;,. ~~.'"". ~~ .oj "~~~~;~~n.~. .Y.~... ti ", ,,4 :; "~':~'i' ~', . ~.j) Ally defective con.truction Dr' damaging deterioration of the S,<.;t~, .. gabien ba.ket-filt.... fabric d....atering system in the '.J"." retention .reas shall be corrected by repair or repl acement ~' , with. suitable substitute prior to the final project ~ acceptance or expiration and release of the maintenance l' band whichever occurs first. If you have any questions, please call us. Si NC:erel y, CONKLIN, PORTER, ~ HOLMES, ENS., INC. WRH/lj ~" Willi.m R. Holmes, P.E. cell .nCll FAM Associates Plans (1) City of Winter Springs (1 City ~ 1 Developer) Soils Report - , r ",Y"'" .. - .;'~. \; 'r' .; ~\:." ',. ....,,-., ., "'. . ~ :t .;- t';.r' . (f. "G. YurcJ..i:Jon ..A:J:Jociate:J REG ,. T ERE D ARC H" E C T r:t11rf'Jf' E R' - NEW YORK OFFICE: SUITE 400 HIRAM SIBLEY BUILDING. EAST AVENUE AND ALEXANDER STREET. ROCHESTER. NEW YORK 14601/ -~. ,.....n~ lIi.325-6565 ~i~~wq.'''~ 'LACE · """"D 'DOCD'NG · W'N". 'AR.. ""'" DA ,,,,,. ..,. COD' ... "..,goo OCT 16 1985 CITY of WINTER SPRINGS an IlAllAGER October IS, 1985 ~!I~'1~ Mr. ~ichard Rozansky City Manager Winter Springs City Hall 1126 E. State Road 434 Winter Springs, FL 32708 ~~@~. \1'~, ...,T'!t~,',fi,~,'~',; " . '", ,', !" . v.. .' ~ l~ Q:~' ~ ' - rt..... arrv J'~' \, \. ' " Re: Coventry Place, Site Plan Review Dear Mr. Rozansky, ..- In accordance with the dates of the, site plan review for the above project, please be advised that our reengineering is nearing completion and resubmtssion will ~e forthcoming this week. It is our intent, per the review reKords to accomodate the review board in all aspects but one. As voiced the~, and conffrmed herein, we intend to appeal the request of your Fire Chief that the structure be fully sprinklered. We will base this appeal on our knowledge that no such requirements exist legally whether federal, state, or local. As per current design we have taken extended steps to afford safe and effective fire safety protection considered more than adequate. In the regard to the time element, although the board has said that all other items should be addressed prior to any appeal, we request to be placed on the agenda for the October 28th meeting inasmuch as we expected that, by that time, these items will have been dealt with. Accordingly we would appreciate your placement on the agenda of our request for appeal. Thank you very much. cc: Peter Cowell o~ C't. '', Gt~ ~'t'~ ew,,,,,., (JMI) f~( C(JI#~ J C4Tt el.c.'l.1G - ~M IglUt8r- - --- ~' ., - -- - CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 1126 STATE ROAD 4J.4 WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 3270lJ Telephone (305) 327-1800 MEH) : October .17, 1985 'ID: City Manager, Richard RozanskY. FRCM: City Plamer, Peter Cowell@; RE: Coventry Place - Attached is a letter received today fran Mr. G. E. Yurchi.son in regard to a sprinkler system for Coventry Place. Also attached are the Site Plan Review Board Minutes of June 25: 1985, discussing the fact that Mr. Yurchison ~d have to go b8ck before the (;onni'ssion. Fran the date of the meeting Mr. Yurchison had 30 days in which to make the request for his appeal to the Site Plan Review Board's decision. lb1 do you wish to have this matter handled? Also, please note) that as of right rDN, we do not have the amended PC/lfJI1 Attachment G) Gi~~ ~~ ~~~m:a\Y~~ . ~~~ OCT 18 1985 ------ site plan. Q)~ ~ ~8n. 8> ~ 'k CITY of WINTER SPRiNGS CITY IlAJIWiiEIl ~ ~ j&.t tt4 Q\, \M..( · l SITE PLAN REVIEW BOARD .. MINUTES TUESDAY. JUNE-25. 1985 " The Site Plan Review Board meetinl w~s called to order at 9:00 a. a. Present: Fire Chief. Charles Holzman; Buildinl Official Sam Smith; Utilities Director Barry Martin; City Planner Peter Cowell and Police Officer Charles Sexton. REVIEW OF COVENTRY PLACE The reason this is cominl back before the Site Plan Review Board is the fact that the review was here over a year alo and therefore is null and void. Further. there are some discrepancies in the plan that need to be reevaluated in the review because they were not clarified or corrected at the time of the orilinal review. - Corrections need to be made to the sidewalks in the rear. The three foot distance will need to be removed allowinl the whole distance of the sidewalk to be even insurinl that there will be no three foot sidewalks. The 9 x 20 parkinl spaces will be brought back to Code at 10 x 20. with handicapped spaces at 12 x 20 with signs. It will be necessary to curb around the areas that are not protected with wheel stops. Dumpsters will be screened and enclosed. Buffering will be along the entire front of the parking lot at the rear of the front setback from the street. In the side yard setbacks a buffered area on the northside of the project is approximately 25 feet in width and an area on the souths ide 15 feet in width is to be left natural. A five foot sidewalk will run the full width of property along the front property line. The sidewalk will be put on the right of way. The developer has provided an adequate parking light plan. Street lights are being reviewed by Florida Power Corporat~on. There will be an internal mail system for the development. The developer has also agreed to help with the traffic signal control device for Moss Road. The retention swales are to be sodded. A new manhole will not be permitted on North Moss Road and any additional watet and sewer problem will have to be worked out with Winter Springs Water and Sewer prior to the issuance of a building permit. The developer will furnish the engineering calculations as to how many apartments can be sufficiently run off the four inch water line to Winter Springs Water and Sewer. Additionally: 1. Drainage and retention engineerinl is to be reviewed by Conklin. Porter & Holmes. Enlineers. 2. The direction and flow of stormwater must be corrected to meet the engineer's specifications for drainage. 3. Sprinkler system will be developed throulhout the buildinl per the recommendation of the fire chief. 4. PVC will be standardized to Winter Springs Wat~r & Sewer specifications. The meter will be moved to the front easement. an~ if necessary additional ease- ment will be Iranted. - Sit a Plan Review Board Heeting, Tuesday, June 25, 1985 Paga 2 5. There will be calculatioD8 t8 ensure that the pressure is adequate for a four inch line. . . 6. Tha hydrant will ba relocated 10 feet away fro. the water force main. 7. There will be buffering across th~ front, also a sidewalk across the front, and curbing around the planted and noncurbed areas that are not protected wheel stops. 8. All parking spaces per code will be 10 x 20, handicapped spaces 12 x 20 with signs, all sidewalks will be the width of the sidewalk either 5 or 6 feet; no 3 foot sidewalks. 9. The rear sidewalk designed in asphalt will be changed to concrete; however, development is a separate issue to be dealt with. It will be left optional. The back sidewalk to be lighted if it is put in. 10. The stripping will be white per DOT Standards. 11. Dumpsters will be enclosed and fenced across the front. 12. Street lights will go before Florida Power Corporation for review of both parking and street lights. 13. The Developer will pickup a copy of the traffic signal agreement so that that can be filled out and returned. The Fire Chief has requested fire sprinkler system throughout the building. ~ .a...h'JL i I [ litH In.. J-U L t - A1Jjl)- ~;1tiftI""~'_r un'" ~.....:... wi... Three members of the Sit,.e Plan Review Board are in favor of the request. Motion was made by Sam Smith and seconded by Peter Cowell to approve with all modifications. All aye. Respectfully submitted, 1f]~, '(J~n~ Mary W lso , \\.......- Record ~ Secretary ~ FI LE ''l:.l/-C/'';60ft A61Oc"'4t.6',.~-: ' .\.~EG"TE"ED AIIICHITECT. AND PL.ANN.E". , YORK o,,~: 1U1T~_Y IUILDING. EAIT AVENUE AND ALEXANDER mEET . "OCHEnER.. NEW YORK 14104 . ARI;A CODE 1'. ~:;... '~!-Il17 I$, lIB "'U'U'UIOI .......U...~ '_TEA ..... '''''''DA ~.......... ... 61'-''''' &---0 ocr 10 - - ~~ Octoh.r 7. 19ft_ em fI WlITER SPRlltGS ~ .~l7JM"16JJ AI cinllW" .r /~S ~'~~, '/j'/~" /I~_.) 'r. ~.te~ Covell. Cityr1anner . "'1', ~~ City R.l1 ~ 1126 B. St.te aoa4 434 -Willter SpriIlS.. l'L 32708 - ~ fa w !1P- ..: Coventry Place, Conlrelate Care Paci1ity for the Elderly, 208 B. Hoaa t.a4, Wint.r S,rin.a~ P10rlda I De.r Hr. Covell, - With reference to your co..ent aeetinl of 1aat Friday wherein Hr. Webb aubattted hia a11el.tory letter witb the subsequent news- paper arttc1e lollovtns the next d.y, lt 1. proper and expected that 1 too should coaaent, and I wl11 herein. To beSin with, ~r. Webb,w.a hired aa the enlineer to desisn the .ite Irades and stera water .aRaleaent. Thi. was accomplished by in.ertion ef hia de.iln upon our orilina1 aite utility plan prepared by our office beartng .y aea1 and aignature. Upon p1aceaent of the I .ite drainase inforaatt~n Hr. Wehb placed hi. seal and signature as well. Thia particular drawing wa. indeed revised at the request of (.1) the office of R.U.D. who raised the elevation of the bui1dinl and aurroundinl sidewalks, and (2) the reque.t of the City of Winter Sprin.. to incorporate the new 4 lane Moa. aoad paving plan, which included a atora water inlet at the front of the aite to acco.odate our forward .tora vater. Actually i.provln. the aite drainale. Hr. V.bb h.d knov1edle of thl. .nd p.rticipated in thia correction. Vhat la leraaine t. that, upon .ub.isaion to the City for. nev aite p1.n review, your con.u1tant., Conk1ia, Porte~ 6 Bo1aea, di.covered a deaign deficiency in the ba1an~. of the dr~inage design inc1udin. a qu.atloninl of the de.iln .yatea '.p10yed. At ao tiae vaa thia office .w.r. of thia, nor had auch dr.lnale ~yat.a be.n chan.ed~ .iace there ..a ao aeed C.t th.t tiae) to qu..tioa ..... la Hr. Vebh'. r( 'ona. to thi. r.iaed queation h. do.a not .ddre.. .thl. ..fici.acy, .eek.41 r.ther to .h.o1v. bi.a.1f of .11 r..pon.ibi1ity inaa.uch .a the oriliaa1 .ravlal ..d h..a r.vl.... Tbi. i. .n atteapt hy .r. V.bh to evade the point 1. qu.atioa. i.... th.t the draiaa,. de.ilni. lacoapetent. laa..uch.. this v.. the .r.a lor vhich Hr. V.hb:... hired, our ia.latence th.t h. cor~.ct the ...t,a .a. aet with hi. ~.'u..1 to .ate aay correctioa.. . Slu_arl1y. . ae. eallne.rlal ..rvlc. la.. heea ..p10y.. an. Hr. Webb terata.te. .. eite enllne.r. ,J t 1r'{' ~~,'" "7f?',- L~< :~":i~~7~ ' . 'Jl:..p.,- rud.j,~JllI"~;-'1;,.,,'" J"'~~"~,.'~.,,~'-':..'~---~:""~' ~~- i.." .. -4.. ......... ,~-':;"..:.. ~ .-.:-. 1"', _,' 1..!4-"'~f:' ~.. .' ..,~l'<.-. '~r . " "'. t< -~~f...'. ~'~. ~..~~. :'f~ ....'~.;;:,;.... I i'~: ~r~ ~ 'q;. .".'" 'r'{" _. C...ll, ;~. . .~ . .ale 2 . /.,. , . , I,"if.,,;:",',:. ' ""', - -~ ." . ,~,.,~...~,l- ,~'. ID conclu.ioD, hi. alles.tion. h..e cr..t.el ..rlou. ,roble.. of a prof...t...l ItC.D.tDI ....ur.'.Del r..ult iD hl.'azpo.ur. aael li.billtJ t. litiS.tl.D, .uch .t.p. w. .re DO. unel.r~'k~.S. . I' r.l~et tht. Ch.t.DOf .'V.Dt.~ .Del apololl.. .ceorellallJ. V, .111 ..k. the correction. n.c....rJ to upholel the el."~1D IDtesrlf) .f tht. wo1'thwhil. proj.ct. j , , 4 .. .' I . '" cc: ttchard tozaaaty Conklin, Porter & Wel... P. Piak~etn.r, Ea.. / - .. I h. tl., , , ~ ; '04 .It .. if~ ' "f; \ ., ... :", . ..: l' ~ 'i' 'l." '-'. ",' :~.:;;. f:- ,. t\..t~ ~; ~. ";': f ;; ~- \;. t :i.. "-' ,-: . ...,~ \~ .e1: i .:::;. \ "._,*7: . , . . ': ~: ~.' ,~, () 'l' ........ <t. ." At'lo,,11H'..r ., .t q.l;.".~1i' ~ tt~ i ~ ....\ .t~--fi' '*', . ~- ~-'\ :! -lI- '~"~ I- ',,.....111' :-, 1M -4,\ -I$. 4 ,";/ r': I, , ..." .....r;' '" :.:,. f,i-:' ~ . ~ A 1 ":- ,"r. -;;r. ",. It ~ ".'~ . ,'~ 1".1 t:'~' t : ~ il r.,:,+() " "" }.' .'1It.' ~ .. "$.1 ~,:'~'.' ~" h.'~ \ '" C .' ~'," ;'~ .. (~ .. ,~". j t'l . .1. .., tt~.);;:! I -e', l ~"... t , 'Jt f~,~ "", ,,~to, ... ff .. iI;" "~i ti.., ,." If":) t" '~fl t ~ 'l~",,: .,'. nj '4,.~ 'i.,' ~.I! ~'.;. -.' Ii " ;.,,~ .io;.: ); ~~. fa' ,'. ',f\U'~' , .. ''t.-~At ~~: ~\ t. :!'.. .a ,'1.' , t.. ,," ;, .;;.. f" '~ ~' -.1; ,. t ,; r " ill ,1:' .at< hit ,. '", :a ~~; <, t' ~ .~~ ~l ,._--L.,k, '~' (DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE) FROM DEP'T City Manager ~, DEP'T Fire Chief SUBJECT Coventry Place - Site Plan Review DATE October 21, 1985 Following are my thoughts and reasoning concerning my suggestions for a total sprinkler system throughout the Coventry Place structure which is referred in Mr. Yurchison's attached letter. Although Mr. Yurchison is correct in stating that no federal, state, or local requirements exist for fully sprinkling the structure I main- tain that the very nature of the type of occupancy and it's inhabitants should be cause for additional personal life safety precautions for those occupants. The fact that the building is a home for the elderly, some will be living alone, some will suffer from failing eyesight, hearing losses, _ and some may-will beborderingon-senili ty, anyone of them still smoking, or for other reasons, lacking their full abilities and facilities, is reason enough to provide the maximum protection for their safety. / Meeting all fire codes, as well as the NFPA Life Safety Code may, in Mr. Yurchison's opinion, be more than adequate, however, meeting those standards merely means that the requirements have been met, not exceeded. Deaths from fire are rarely attributed to burns, rather the result of asphyxiation due to the inhalation of toxic gases-even from small fires, i.e., a smoldering mattress or a chair. I base my suggestion of a total sprinkled building of this nature on the fact that it has been reported that there have been no reported deaths in structures that contained a fully sprinklered system that was in working condition at the time the fire occurred. '~~tllWltij OCT 23 1985 CllY of WINTER SPRINGS , em MANAGER .- CI~~fiENGS' FL!~t1T( 1126 STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708 Telephone (305) 327.1800 MFM): October 23, 1985 10: City Manager~ and Camlission F'RCM: City PlBIUler. Peter Cowell RE: Mt. Greenwood PUD. Tracts 1 and 2 Final Engineering Attached is a copy of the City Engineer's report to accept the final engineering for Tracts 1 and 2 of Mt. Greenwood PUD. The type of housing is canparable to R-lM housing directly ,- across fran Hayes Road to the entrance. These provisos have not been received for acceptance: 1. The design and engineering for the right turn lane onto Hayes Road and S.R. 434. 2. The sidewalk along Hacienda Village down Hayes Road to the project entrance. 3. Engineering and design and site plan for the amenities package for Tract 6. 4. The wall dividing Hacienda Village fran Tracts 1 and 3 of Mt. Greenwood . Further. the developer will not be able to plat or pull any building pennits until the issue of the perculation ponds has been resolved. PC/IIIN Attaclmmt - ,-" .. ,... t: ~' ' - "'9ctoberl. 1985- ~4: \~ , Conklin, ~ort.r and Holmes ~ ~ ENGINEERS, INC. a 500 w. FULTON STREET POST OFFICE BOX 11176 SANFORD, FlORIDA 32771 TEl305322-6841 TEL30513Hi717 J' < ' Mr. ,.Pete Cowell ti ty of, Wi nter Spri ngs ,1.126 EastS.,R. :434, 'Vi nter Springs ~ FL 32708 ~ountGreenwood Phases I and II CPH Project No. W0402.00 Dear Mr. Cowell: Re: We have completed the review of the engineering supplied by Boyer Singleton & Associates for the Mount Greenwood PUD Tracts 1 and 2. The following comments are based on this review. 1. Lots 29, 30, 31, and 32 are graded as -BM lots to the back of the property lines. A potential problem is created in this area should the lots on 36, 37, and 38 be constructed improperly or if swimming pools are added at a later date, thereby cutting off the swale drainage thru these .roperties. To eliminate this problem, easements would have to be provided ~etween lots 36, 37, 38 and 39 or the grading plan for1.ots 29, 30, 31, and 32 should be changed to Type A ~ ots. ;2~ ""'ow.trows should be added to indicate the direction of '; ,'flow along the rear retention swale behind lots 10,11,12 .nd 13 of Tract 1. 3. . Tract no~ 2 has no sewer service to Lot no. 12. The spacing of the fire hydrants in Tract no. 2 did not meet the City ~Code of 350' to the lot line. No additional hydrants should 'be" .requi ~ed as hydrants shown can be relocated to meet the . code~, ','.;$: 'l~,.. ,. ('-j .i !,' .~', ,;' . ;'We reco..end that additio-na1 so11s information be provided .' ..~ 'to f ndfcat'e whether underdra1 n~s wi 11 be needed on these '~;:f;:'streets . 1"~~.? ", . , ,';J : '.' ".", -,":,,:,.,,~~pproval '1),fthese draw1ngs1s contingent on the resolution of .;;:,Hithe above 1 te.s. -4'~' :.-(.. 4-',',"/ ':' ' " . ; .' , . " . . :1;- (",.j t,': ,:~'~: ',I~' t,,,),,:~'''f.YOU haveanyquest1ons, please call our offices. .. .';"l,~. S1nc&relY4 ...::\{~~~:~ES TMZ:alv 10 a -.ENGINEERS" I NC.