Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983 05 10 City Commission Regular Minutes ~ 82-83-18 . REGULAR MEETING CITY COMMISSION CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS ~~Y 10, 1983 The Regular Meeting of the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, was called to order by Mayor John V. Torcaso. Roll Call: Mayor John V. Torcaso, present Deputy Mayor Buck Adkins, present City Manager Richard Rozansky, present City Attorney Frank Kruppenbacher, present Commissioners: Jim Hartman, present Inez Linville, late Martin Trencher, present Leanne Grove, present Motion was made by Commissioner Trencher, seconded by Commissioner Hartman, to approve the minutes of April 26, 1983. Discussion. Vote on the motion: Commissioner Trencher, aye; Commissioner Grove, aye; Commissioner Hartman, aye; Commissioner Adkins, aye; motion carried. Public Input: Mr. Mike DePasquale, said the Association to a softball game. July 1 and the game Alton would Mayor could -~t~ Road, representing Sugar C~ Homeowners Association, like to challenge the City employees and Commissioners Torcaso said the City would be having a picnic on Friday, be held then. . General Agenda: Mr. George Yurchison, Winter Springs Elderly Update: Mr. George Yurchison, one of the partners in Winter Springs Elderly Comm~nities Ltd., who are the sponsors of Coventry Towers which is to be built on North Moss Road spoke -,out the progress of their project. Their original plan was to build 119 units-5- story building. They just recently received approval from the Federal Government for 70 units - 3-story building. Mr. Yurchison said one of the main conditions of their approval was that Moss Road must be paved. He presented Manager Rozansky with a copy of approval letter. Mr. Yurchison said they could possibly start construction in September and that Moss Road would have to be committed for paving. Preliminary Plan for Pinewood Terrace: The City Planner explained that the property is located on south Moss Road on the east side adjacent to Hacienda Village directly north of the Southern Bell facility and is zoned C-l. The applicant acquired a conditional use approval from the Board of Adjustment to build multi-family in a commercial zone. The Board placed two conditions, one that there be a fence along;~ll three sides and also that they provide on-site playground with facilities so that any children living in this area would not be tempted to use the facilities in the mobile home park. Based on that approval the preliminary plan was submitted showing eight lots, each one will be developed with a quadraplex, 4 townhouse units in one building, common driveways with two parking spaces for each unit; the Engineer recommends approval and the Planning and Zoning Board also recommended approval. The Staff and Board also recommended the waiver to providing 5% for recreation to the public. . Motion was made by Commissioner Hartman, seconded by Commissioner Grove that we approve the preliminary plan for Pinewood Terrace as presented. Discussion. Vote on the motion: Commissioner Grove, aye; Commissioner Hartman, aye; Commissioner Adkins, aye; Commissioner Linville, aye; Commissioner Trencher, aye; motion carried. II' Regular Meeting, City Commission, May 10, 1983 Page 2 82-83-18 ~ Modification of request for amendment to approved plan for Wildwood Planned Unit Development: The City Planner explained that earlier this spring Mr. Dittmer applied for a revision to the plan of Wildwood to redesignate the 30 acres of multi-family to industrial which was declined by both the Planning & Zoning Board and the Commission. Mr. Dittmer returned with a plan which was drawn with his intent of meeting the objections that everyone had had to his original plan. The Board found this plan consistent and therefore approvable, and was merely presented to the Commission as a courtesy and for their information. Extension of approval of Preliminary Plan for Foxmoor Unit 4: Motion was made by Commissioner Trencher, seconded by Commissioner Linville to grant an approval for extension of one year for the preliminary plan for Foxmoor Unit 4. Discussion. Vote on the motion: Commissioner Hartman, aye; Commissioner Adkins, aye; Commissioner Linville, aye; Commissioner Trencher aye; Commissioner Grove, aye; motion carried. Request for Lot Split, Lot 5, Block L, Ranches Sec. 6 - Van Houten: Resolution No. 415, providing for the division of Lot 5, Block L, Ranches Sec. 6, etc.: Motion was made by Commissioner Adkins, seconded by CommLssioner Trencher to approve the Lot Split on Lot 5, Block L, Ranches Sec. 6. Discussion. Vote on the motion: Commissioner Adkins, aye; Commissioner Linville, aye; Commissioner Trencher, aye; Commissioner Grove, aye; Commissioner Hartman, aye; motion carried. . Motion was made by Commissioner Linville, seconded by Commissioner Hartman to approve Resolution No. 415. Discussion. Vote on the motion: Commissioner Linville, aye; Commissioner Trencher, aye; Commissioner Grove, aye; Commissioner Hartman, aye; Commissioner Adkins, aye; motion carried. Pope vs. Winter Springs will be on the agenda for the next meeting. City Manager - Richard Rozansky: The City Manager was given authorization to shop around for a grader and come back to the Commission with prices. The City Manager discussed the memo on flood control elevations on Shore Road. Manager Rozansky asked Mr Cooper to go back to FEMA and ask them to size a culvert which would permit that elevation to be reduced. Manager Rozansky reported on the NOWSCO negotiations. There was a meeting with Cal Conklin, Bill Leedy, Buck Adkins, City }~nager and Tom Lang. It was recommended that Tom Lang be the spokesman in the negotiations. Manager Rozansky recommended that the consulting engineer and fiscal agent supply Mr. Lang with the pertinent data. Mr. Conklin was asked to give a rough estimate of the physical value of the facility and Mr. Conklin and Mr. Leedy were asked to update the net income figures. Commission Seat I - Jim Hartman: Commissioner Hartman discussed the letter from Attorney Jones to Attorney Kruppenbacher dated May 2, 1983. Motion was made by Commissioner Hartman to instruct the firm of Swann and Haddock to take over the Florida Land vs. City of Winter Springs negotiations. Seconded by . .. . Regular Meeting, City Commission, May 10, 1983 Page 3 82-83-18 Commissioner Linville. Discussion. Vote on the Commissioner Grove, aye; Commissioner Hartman, Commissioner Linville, aye; motion carried. motion: Commissioner Trencher, aye; aye; Commissioner Adkins, aye; Commissioner Hartman said he would not be at the next Commission Meeting due to a meeting in Kansas City for the National Association of Regional Planning Councils. Commission Seat II - Buck Adkins: Commissioner Adkins requested the Commission to go along with him and ask for a safety survey to be done in Tuscawilla for the new school that will be opening in the Fall. He asked that someone from the Seminole County School Board, Mr. Jack Cooper, Mr. Jay Alpert, our Chief of Police and the Director of Public Works survey the problem. In reference to the right-of-way tree program, Commissioner Adkins felt there should be some type of Code to allow people to plant trees in the right-of-ways. Commission Seat III - Inez Linville: Commissioner Linville said she would be in Tallahassee and could not attend the next Commission Meeting. She also talked about code changes and asked that copies be made of the letter from the Orlando-Winter Park Board of Realtors for the P&Z Board. . Commission Seat IV - Martin Trencher: Commissioner Trencher asked the status of the patio home project on Third Street. Manager Rozansky reported it is on hold by order of D.E.R. Commissioner Trencher said there is a potential for some danger and asked if a fence could be put around to keep children out. Commission Seat V - Leanne Grove: No report. Mayor's Office: Mayor Torcaso reported that the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners would be here on Tuesday, May 17th at 1:00 p. m. to discuss the gas tax. There will be a picnic on Friday, July 1, at 2 p.m. at Sunshine Park, for all City employees and Commissioners. Meeting adjourned 8:45 p. m. Respectfully submitted, mrw,T~ Mary T. Norton, City Clerk Approved: .. ~ ,MAYOR CASO . FORM 4 r:;; 3/07 MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT THE BOARD. COUNCIL,COMMISSION. AUTHORITY. OR COMMITTEE ON WHICH I SERVE IS A UNIT OF: ;{CITY C COUNTY C OTHER LOCAL AGENCY eSTATE NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OR STATE AGENCY WHO MUST FILE FORM 4 This form is for use by any person serving on either an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee, whether state or local, and it applies equally to members of advisory and non-advisory bodies who are faced with a voting conflict of interest. As the voting conflict requirements for public officers at the local level differ from the requirements for state officers, this form is divided into two parts: PART A is for use by persons serving on local boards (municipal, county, special tax districts, etc.), while PART B is prescribed for all other boards, i.e., those at the state level. PART C of the form contains instructions as to when and where this form must be filed. e PART A VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS [Required by Section 112.3143(3), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984).] The Code of Ethics for Public Officers and Employees PROHIBITS each municipal. county. and other local public officer FROM VOTING in an official capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting in his official capacity upon any measure which inures to the special gain of any principal (other than a government agency as defined in Section 112.312(2), Florida Statutes) by whom he is retained. In any such case a local public officer must disclose the conflict: (a) PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING T AK.EN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of his interest in the matter on which he is abstaining from voting; and (b) WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by describing the nature of his interest as a public record in this part below. NOTE: Commissioners of a Community Redevelopment Agency created or designated pursuant to Section 163.356 or Section 163.357, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984), or officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one-acre, one-vote basis are not prohibited from voting. In such cases, however, the oral and written disclosure of this part must be made. 5~J I, the undersigned local public officer, hereby disclose that on ,19~ (a) I abstained from voting on a matter which (check one): _ _ inured to my s~cial private gain; or V:red to the special gain of~e.,. fl ~d'1R 7/i1 A;o F;; 7J,. e;P , by whom I am retained. (b) The measure on which I abstained and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows: ~~-- nature ==--- --. Please see PART C for instructions on when and where to file this form. PART B VOTING CONFLICT DISCLOSURE FOR STATE OFFICERS [Required by Section 112.3143(2), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1984).] Each state public officer is permitted to vote in his official capacity on any matter. However, any state officer who votes in his official capacity upon any measure which inures to his special private gain or the special gain of any principal by whom he is retained is required to disclose the nature of his interest as a public record in Part B below within I S days after the vote occurs. I, the undersigned officer of a state agency, hereby disclose that on , 19 _: (a) I voted on a matter which (check one): _ inured to my special private gain; or _ inured to the special gain of , by whom I am retained. (b) The measure on which I voted and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows: Date Filed Signature Please see PART C below for instructions on when and where to file this form. PART C FILING INSTRUCTIONS This memorandum must be filed within fifteen (I S) days following the meeting during which the voting conflict occurred with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who shall incorporate the memorandum in the meeting minutes. This form need not be filed merely to indicate the absence of a voting conflict. -- NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES,II2.JI7(I98J). A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT. REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT. DEMOTION. REDUCTION IN SALARY. REPRIMAND. OR A CIVIL PENAL TV NOT TO EXCEED SS.OOO.