HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982 11 09 Regular
bl LAST N.AME _ FIRS~~~.~~ID~E N~EEMORA N DU M AG~~ i~~~l ND~E ~~~ !:~~ ~!URRED
! \ \")i< I i,J So ~l; (Zt W 6-E j\".' PO' I a . :;2..
f MAILING ADDRESS STATE NAME OF PERSON RECORDING MINUTES
It"3~ 'yt-I{I\S./.t,,--:--r cere DCOUNTY mfll' i()OIiTO)J
. ZIP COUNTY TITLE OF PERSON R. ECORDING MINUTES
\l~."t'"C.(SP~lf.-'-.s 3.,)708 SEwH/'-t\ ~UNICIPALITY Ci7'f Cc-(-rt
NAME OF AGENCY SPECIFY
Llf
6 ~ \.A.-' I ~\(. ~'t ~ PIZ tlV (,-.J
DOTHER
MEMORANDUM OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN A VOTING SITUATION [Required by Florida Statutes @112.3143 (1979) ]
If you have voted in your official capacity upon any measure in which you had a personal, private, or professional interest which inures to
your special private gain or the special private gain of any principal by whom you are retained, please disclose the nature of your interest
below.
1. Description of the matter upon which you voted in your official capacity:
Rf Z f) k,.' 0- () (:- C. ~ ~\ 1-\\t--:' L- A w\JD
--p U l') ~ (2 C (V\ ~ PAR (L '''\C)
\) c2l/' A (:. K ~-
{.)A12 ( e L-
C ,r-.,v {ye
,,..; 1L-\:~C.q<.A..,.J(,.la.
l <>- () 0-' n:s
2. Description of the personal, private, or professional interest you have in the above matter which inures to your special private gain or
the special private gain of any principal by whom you are retained:
e
l-ttiJ.'f\ E::- () u.: ^-)t (2. c:(
fti) vfS I IU 'iH~
~c L ~r~~e
s A H/\ (.-
(j .C .S IV"- (ri (~
.p\.~ D
?Vf+i'lA L L{
3. Person or principal to whom the special gain described above will inure:
va
G-,qlli/
I p-" (;1 () <- L e ()
^...-~-'---......_'"-...~~-
.~,._------:;;>
a.D Yourself b.D
Principal by whom you are retained:
(NAME)
SIGNATURE
----r3
~~
DATE ON WHICH FORM 4 WAS FILED WITH THE PERSON
RESPONSIBLE FOR RECORDING MINUTES OF THE MEETING AT
WHICH THE VOlE OCJ:URRED:
II !..)lll r ~
FILING INSTRUCTIONS
This memorandum must be filed within fifteen (15) days following the meeting during which the voting conflict occurred with the person
responsible for recording the minutes of tj1e meeting, who shall incorporate the memorandum in the meeting minutes. This form need not be
filed merely to indicate the absence of a voting conflict. Florida law permits but does not require you to abstain from voting when a conflict
~i'''''' "i",; if you ,ole, how..." Ihe ,onmet mu,' h, di"lo"d pm"u,n' to Ih, requirem,n" d",tih,d ,hove.
I ,
I
NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES S 112.317 (1979), A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES
GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE 1
OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NO~ TO EXC~ED $5,000. __J
CE FORM 4 - REV. 12-79
I FORfu1 4 1\!1Er1fiORANDUM OF VOTH\'G CONFL~CT -------
'I LAST N,AME - FIRST r-:~E - ~lIDDLE NM.iE
l\~i<' tJs. ~(;2L ~ C~_I~IP
, MAILING ADDRESS
Lu ~ ~ "Pi-I (; -As A- l,-:-r C (Ie
I C.l ~ \:"C\lS f:> R.l jl..\-S ZIP ".3 .JIDD cO~:nll.""
i NAME OF AGENCY
! c.. t r'f 6 j: vL." i ~\( K s. f\( (Iv<.;-j
)
OSTATE
DATE 07 WHZI H VOTE OCCURRED
J l Co CJ-
_ f ~__________________
NAME OF PERSO;-l Rr:CORDlNG MINUTES
In fltL I"\.-1(kT(;J ,I
TITLE OF PERSON RE60RDING Ml':-;UTES --- --1
. , ,~ I
C' /"7 'i C <-(-,i:!1t' I
----~ '
SPECIFY I
AGENCY is unit of:
DCOUNTY
I!I~U':-;ICIPALITY
OOTHER
I
.--.J
MEMO RANDUM 0 F CO N F LI CT OF I NT E R EST I N A VOT I NG S ITUA TION [R'qui"d b,' F/o,ido St, tot" S 112.3143 (J 979) I J
If you have voted in your official capacity upon any measure in which you had a personal, private, or professional interest which i~ures to I
I you, 'pociaJ p,'vate gain "' the 'pecial p,'vate gain of any principal by whom you ",e "talned, please di"lo" the natu" of yom mt""t I
, below. ' I
1. Description of the matter upon which you voted in your official capacity: I
Rf If) L'&-- D t=- C. ~ ~\ 1-\\~_: L- A ~"D ()A12 ( ~ L. , t--J " ,_::~ r. "l.."v I.. (. 4-
- ,...." -r I'L. 0~J .:T5
-.::> I' r-- -, l' v \. ~ fA) tr( (:' Ff-l tiI, "'( '\() C G\lL.- P 0 H
r 0 \-J r K.0 I ' . - Y CK.. A C (,,, ""<
e
Description of the personal, private, or professional interest you have in the above matter which inures to your special private gain or
the special private gain of any principal by whom you are retained:
H-{/Y\.~ <=- ULL k..'t~~ 2( ~0 L '-\~A,(
fJ-i1 ).t- of..5 I IU 'T H (:-
S f\ r~ ^\ (~
('~
lJ~
.pI.-' D
'S rv,- 6-( (-:-
plt-t-,/l, L l.(
2.
3. Person or principal to whom the special gain described above will inure:
Ivt;
G"-11It-
'/ ;i/(;./() c.. t.et::)
.-.---.------...,;>
a.D Yourself b.D
Principal by whom you are retained:
(N AME)
~u-
DATE ON WHICH FORM 4
RESPONSIBLE FOR RECORDING
WHICH THE VOlE OC;URRED:
II l~'lll r- .).
W AS FILED WITH THE PERSON I
""L'TES OF THE "EE:]
I
FILING INSTRUCTIONS ,
This m~morandum must be filed within fifteen (15) days following the meeting during which the voting conflict occurred with the person 'I
responsible for recording the minutes of t/1e meeting, who shall incorporate the memorandum in the meeting minutes. This form need not be
! filed merely to indicate the absence of a voting cOllfIict. Florida law permits but does not require you to abstain from voting when a confIict
i of interest arises; if you vote. however, the confIict must be disclosed pursuant to the requirements described above.
~. '
j NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES g112.317 (1979), A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES I
l GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: I:\IPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FRO~1 OFFICE I
~R EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED S5.000. ...__oJ
CE FORM 4 .. REV. 12-79" .
I . FORM 4 MEMORANDUM..Ofyo-nNG C()\\lF~!CT..____
. LAST NAME - FIRST NAME - MIDDLE NAME . AGENCY is unit of: DATE 07 \;I'f,H VOTE OCCURRED
I i\\~l< \ ~)3. '~(;;2.L 0i (;~ ,,-,p OSl'ATE /l C',,-l.YJ-
! MAILING ADDRESS NAME OF PERSON RECORDlNGr.llNUTES-----
j t \ "34 yt-I { -As. J.\ ':....1""" (( Ie OCOUNTY I)'} t1ft 'lx.1( TC l,j
ro'" ZIP --COUNTY TITLEOF PER-SO~; R-ECORDING!-.li~"'UTES
lIt",,'I.l-\..-C-C\( Spel"-\-S '3.JlD'i5 ,::X-nl/""'- lB'GUNICIPALITY c;,~'/-7Y (,-.{Ii'1(
NAME OF AGENCY SPECIFY
6 f=. vl.' II'-'\{ ~'1- S t> i( I 10 c...,j OOTHER
-j
i
I
I
I
\
If you have voted in your official capacity upon any measure in which you had a personal, private, or professional interest which inures to i
your special private gain or the special private gain of any principal by whom you are retained, please disclose the nature of your interest I
below.
MEMORANDUM OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN A VOTING SITUATION [Required by Florida Statutes 9112.3143 (1979) ]
1. Description of the matter upon which you voted in your official capacity:
Qf Z l> i....' 6- 0 r:: C ~ t::\ 1-\\1'-...: L.-- A ~vD I)A," ( e I..
'-c>A~ ~
-p U ~) ~ t~ C (\- \ Sc .f-l () t; ~ '\c) T .
,1J
-, Li :~ r: #..{......,: t.. L a.
2.
Description of the personal, private, or professional interest you have in the above matter which inures to your special private gain or
the special private gain of any principal by whom you are retained:
I-t'{;i, \;'"\ e- U L~ k..,'-t ~ c{ ~C L ,-\\(;e
ft-' ) V t s
r~
'"'. ~
lot
.S ; v'-- (j ( (;.
pv/}Viii L L (
e
I JU
'T tJ c--
S II ~.\-\ (~
f>\.' D
3. Person or principal to whom the special gain described above will inure:
Ivd
Gi1llt,
l P.d;,! () L L~;~)
,..-------..,.
a.D Yourself b.D
Principal by whom you are retained:
---3
~Z-
DATE ON WHICH FORM 4 WAS FILED WITH THE PERSON I
RESPONSIBLE FOR RECORmNG MINUTES OF THE MEET<NG AT I
WIlICH TH;/VZ:;li-jRED: I
(NAME)
SIGNATURE
I
I
FILING INSTRUCTIONS I
I
This memorandum must be filed within fifteen (15) days following the meeting during which the voting conflict occurred with the person !
responsible for recording the minutes of tile meeting, who shall incorporate the memorandum in the meeting minutes. This form need not be I
filed merely to indicate the absence of a voting conflict. Florida law permits but does not require you to abstain from voting when a conflict i
i of interest arises; if you vote, however, the conflict must be disclosed pursuant to the requirements described above. i
rl I
!
~I i
I
NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES s112.317 (1979), A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE COSSTITUTES :
GROUNDS FOR AND ~fAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: I~IPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FRO:'-! OFFICE'
OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $:;,000. I
. I
CE FORM 4 _ REV. 12..79 - ____I
.1 LAST NAME _ FlRS:~~~~~ID~E N~~EEMORANDU M AG~~Y ;~;g!Il\~~E ~-?~~~;E~JURRED-~~-._.-
! !\\'):< \l\Js' ~0i2-L ~ G--<: f~IP DSTATE Il ({ J-_______.___~__~_
i MAILING ADDRESS NA~lE OF PERSO~ RECORDING MINUTES
LJ \ "3~ yt-l ( -As 1\ I\..-:-r- C (Ie DCOUNTY Ii} 1-1 I: '-I 't,({(JJ2~____
I c... - . ZIP. COUNTY TITLE OF PERSON RECORDING !\IlNUTES
. 'I.""\;"C\'~ SPR-lli-\-s "3:}70D -S"61l/1"'t., S",UNICIPALITY C/7'j CL-(tdC
II NAME OF AGENCY SPECIFY
C l r 6 f:. I.A.' I ~\( ~t. <;;. P ,Z I ,v <.:;:J DOTHER
l
I
If you have voted in your official capacity upon any measure in which you had a personal, private, or professional interest which inures to i
your spreiaI private gain or the special private gain of any principal by whom you are retained, please disclose the nature of your interest
b~tow.
MEMORANDUM OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN A VOTING.SITUATION [Required by Florida Statutes 9112.3143 (1979) ]
1. Description of the matter upon which you voted in your official capacity:
l(€ Ie) 1-'€;- 0 r: C. ~ ~\ ~\\t__' '- A ~\..;\)
-p (,) D }=' (2 C fv \ Coy\) \ \t-ett:c I 1\ l '1C
'? <2 ,~ :A C b<" €-
j)Atc? ( ~' I..
,i-Y
., L :~ c "-l"'~ '- L 4
(i'v. ":" ....... '"T l F A V\,\. \ L ('
{J...~ 0 "v 1.~Ly
2.
Description otthe personal, private, or professional interest you have in the above matter which inures to your special private gain or
the special private gain of any principal by whom you are retained:
b f'
\-;)0 L \. \ ~(?i,(
[ttiJ ~ t- .D u..:: i..; t~ c(
frt ) ).(. t- .S I IU " tJ (:-
S Ii t~ \ f-
p
(j .L-
f>,,-' D
,~lit...... (7((.~
rvj}i'j/" L l{
e
3. Person or principal to whom the special gain described above will inure:
A/~
G~(lt.
I Ii. (;I () <.. L.€ ()
---..;>
a.D Yourself b.D
Principal by whom you are retained:
(NAME)
-6,
/) ,
L~c.-
DATE ON WHICH FORM 4 WAS FILED WITH THE PERSON
RESPONSIBLE FOR RECORDING MINUTES OF THE MEETING AT I
WHICH TH;/VZ:;1i-:;ED: I
SIGNATURE
FILING INSTRUCTIONS I
This memorandum must be filed within fifteen (15) days following the meeting during which the voting conflict occurred with the person I
responsible for recording the minutes of t/1e meeting, who shall incorporate the memorandum in the meeting minutes. This form need not be I
filed merely to indicate the absence of a voting conflict. Florida law permits but does not require you to abstain from voting when a conflict
~.'''l ad"" 'f you ,ot., how"",, tho conflict must h. d,.,ln"d pu<suant to tho Iequi"m.nls describod above. !
, NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLOIl.IDA STATUTES S 112.317 (1979). A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES I
GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: P..!l'EACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FRO~l OFFICE I
OIl. EMPLOYMENT. DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $5,000. J
CE FORM 4 - REV. 12-79
, ----:.
i.BROAD AND CASSEL
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
,~ ~ \:-1 ~\,:=:qSI-i(,J li'.,::L'j':)I'iG ?RO~ES3;:JNA,- ,..It.3.30CI.ATION'3;
.
OF" COUNSEL
SHEPARD BROAD
LEWIS HORWITZ
ALVIN CASSEL
NORMAN BROAD, R A.
MURRAY D. SHEAR, P.A.
PHILIP M. SEGAL
CRAIG B. SHERMAN
.JE....REY A. DEUTCH
PATRICIA LEBOW
E. RICHARD ALHADE"F
C. KEN BISHOP
IRVING SHIMO....
ALEX C. KUROS .
ROBERT D. GATTON
H. .JACK KLINGENSMITH
RICHARD B. M",e~ARL.AND
.. VERNON BENNETT
PAUL A. LESTER
BRUCE D. FISCHMAN
DAVID SHEAR
C. DAVID BROWN, 1/
DAVID .J. BERGER
MARSHALL .J. EMAS
.JOHN BARIC
RICHARD H. BREIT
IRA R. GORDON
CHARLES D. WILDER
SUSAN LEVINE
PATRICIA E. KAHN
DENNIS L. STEWART
MARK L. R'VLIN
.JOHN S. FREUD
WILLlA'" H. "'LBORNOZ AND
WIL...REOO .... RODRIGUEZ, PoA.
BARNETT BANK BUILDING
1106 KANE CONCOURSE
BAY HARBOR ISLANDS, "LORIDA 33154
(3051 868 -1000
BROWARD 763-2070
TELEX: 51-4736 HALA
1155 HAMMOND DRIVE, N. E.
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30326
(4041393-2100
CITY NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
25 WEST F"LAGLER STREET
MIAMI, F"LORIDA 33130
(3051371-9100
2699 LEE ROAD
WINTER PARK, FLORIDA 32769
13051 645 -1434
INTERSTATE PLAZA
1499 WEST PALMETTO PARK ROAD
BOCA RATON, F"LORIDA 33432
(3051 368-4433
. NOT ADMITTED IN F"L.ORIOA
PLEASE REPLY TO: ~'linter Park
November 10, 1982
The Honorable John V. Torcaso
Mayor of the City of Winter Springs
400 North Edgemon Avenue
Winter Springs, Florida 32708
e
Re: Winter Springs Development Corp., Request
for rezoning of certain parcels of property
in the Tuscawilla P.U.D. heard Tuesday,
November 9, 1982.
Dear Mayor Torcaso:
I would like to personally thank you and the other Commiss-
ioners for the manner in which the City Council Meeting was conducted
on November 9, 1982. Also, since several matters were brought up at
the meeting concerning the request before the Commission, and also
future requests which may be made by Winter Springs Development Corp.
as the Developer of Tuscawilla P.U.D., I believe a clarification of
certain items would be in order. Also, the purpose of this letter is
to give you and the Commission assurances that Winter Springs Develop-
ment Corp. will,'indeed, abide by its agreements.
As part of the approval of Request "A", I would like to make
the following commitments on behalf of Winter Springs Development Corp.
~hese are as follows:
1. Winter Springs Development Corp. will designate a five-acre
passive Park. The Park will be located west of the old Bear Creek Park.
A rough drawing of the location was submitted to the City Planner and a
final version will be forwarded immediately. In conjunction with the
designation of this Park, the Developer has agreed to hand-clear the
area and place park benches on the site.
.
'"
:.
.
The Honorable John V. Torcaso
Mayor of the City of Winter Springs
Re: winter Springs Development Corp.
November 10, 1982
Page two.
.,0') .t'')
0t\ j,
. '-'1 p_ '"\
~ ~:')/
~!, 2. As part of the rezoning of the old school site to a Park ~~. \
1, , site, the Developer has agreed to add "Phase 7" to the amenities.,;) /\ V .,-.c.
, , package previously committed to the City. At such time as three C }~",~\
thousand lots have been developed, then the Developer has agreed to ~ ,u
add one baseball field and two soccer fields to the Park (old school
site) location.
3. As part of Request "A" certain properties have now been
zoned for Multi-Family Housing Development. It is agreed that, in
accordance with prior understandings, the Developer will limit the
development of the newly zoned property to no more than twelve Units
per acre.
As to Request "B", which was granted by the Commission,. the
Developer has agreed as follows:
e
.:.-.,....,.
1. The newly rezoned property will be limited to six Units
per acre and shall be designated as "patio homes". The Developer has
agreed to provide detailed site buffering plans for the perimeter of
the property, which will include a visual barrier which is at least
fifty percent obscure when the first living unit gets a certificate
of Occupancy and should be designed to be seventy-five percent obscure
and at least five-feet high, two years l~ter.... '.. ~.~ .... .~JeUL-t.A.
7 -; ~~ ~s ,(' v_"::-C:::: \~ (t \.:-.::sy- 1'u M'" i c~, \..,)\,..t...Jt'-I~(' ~ - ~
2. The Developer has agreed that pr10r to su~mittinq its final
development plan to the Planning and Zoning Board for approval, it
'shall inform the Homeowners Association of its plans so that the home-
owners can adequately present their views to the Planning and Zoning
Board prior to the approval of the final development plan. All sub-
missions will be in accordance with the existing Planned Unit Develop-
ment ordinance for the City of Winter Springs. f-:VS k ""3 t\( ~.( ~ '
As you are aware, the Developer had made the commitment that in
,_ the event all three requests were approved by the Commission,..J::.hen the
Developer would not seek any further redesignation of additional single-
family property to Condominium within the P.U.D. Inasmuch as Request
"c" was denied, then the Developer has reserved its right to apply for
future rezoning of property within the P.U.D. if it becomes necessary
or desirable by the Developer.
.
BROAD AXD CASSEL
1
,.
.
The Honorable John V. Trocaso
Mayor of the City of Winter Springs
Re: Winter Springs Development Corp.
November 10, 1982
Page three.
Again, I would like to thank you for the courtesies extended
by the Commission at the meeting, and if you require any additional
information, please contact me at your convenience.
CKB:ml
cc:, To Commissioners:
Mr. Jim Hartman
V' Mr. Buck Adkins
Mr. Martin Trencher
Ms. Maureen Boyd
Ms. Leanne Grove
.
cc: Mr. Roy T. Dye
Mr. Jay Alpert
Ms. Jacqueline Koch,
City Planner
Ms. Mary Norton,
City Clerk
.
BROAD AND CASSEL
BROAD AND CASSEL
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
ePARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS}
OF" COUNSEL
SHEPARD BROAD
LEWIS HORWITZ
ALVIN CASSEL
NORMAN BROAD, P. A.
MURRAY D. SHEAR, P.A.
PHILIP M. SEGAL
CRAIG B. SHERMAN
.JEFFREY A. DEUTCH
PATRICIA LEBOW
E. RICHARD ALHADEFF
C. KEN BISHOP
IRVING SHIMOFT
ALEX C. KUROS .
ROBERT D. GATTON
H. ..JACK KLINGENSMITH
RICHARD B. MACFARLAND
F. VERNON BENNETT
PAUL A. LESTER
BRUCE D. FISCHMAN
. NOT ADMITTED IN FLORIDA
DAVID SHEAR
C. DAVID BROWN, 1/
DAVID .J. BERGER
MARSHALL .J. EMAS
.JOHN BARIC
RICHARD H. BREIT
IRA R. GORDON
CHARLES D. WILDER
SUSAN LEVINE
PATRICIA E. KAHN
DENNIS L. STEWART
MARK L. RIVLIN
.JOHN S. FREUD
WILLIAM H. ALBORNOZ AND
WILFREDO A. RODRIGUEZ, P.A.
BARNETT BANK BUILDING
1108 KANE CONCOURSE
BAY HARBOR ISLANDS, FLORIDA 33154
(305) 868 -1000
BROWARD 763-2070
TELEX: 51-4736 HALA
1/55 HAMMOND DRIVE, N. E.
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30328
(404) 393-2100
CITY NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
25 WEST FLAGLER STREET
MIAMI, FLORIDA 33130
(305) 371-9100
2699 LEE ROAD
WINTER PARK, FLORIDA 32789
(305) 645 -1434
INTERSTATE PLAZA
1499 WEST PALMETTO PARK ROAD
BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33432
(305) 368-4433
PLEASE REPLY TO: Winter Park
November 10, 1982
The Honorable John V. Torcaso
Mayor of the City of Winter Springs
400 North Edgemon Avenue
Winter Springs, Florida 32708
Re:
e
Winter Springs Development Corp., Request
for rezoning of certain parcels of property
in the Tuscawilla P.U.D. heard Tuesday,
November 9, 1982.
Dear Mayor Torcaso:
I would like to personally thank you and the other Commiss-
ioners for the manner in which the City Council Meeting was conducted
on November 9, 1982. Also, since several matters were brought up at
the meeting concerning the request before the Commission, and also
future requests which may be made by Winter Springs Development Corp.
as the Developer of Tuscawilla P.U.D., I believe a clarification of
certain items would be in order. Also, the purpose of this letter is
to give you and the Commission assurances that Winter Springs Develop-
ment Corp. will, . indeed, abide by its agreements.
As part of the approval of Request "A", I would like to make
the following commitments on behalf of Winter Springs Development Corp.
These are as follows:
1. Winter Springs Development Corp. will designate a five-acre
passive Park. The Park will be located west of the old Bear Creek Park.
A rough drawing of the location was submitted to the City Planner and a
final version will be forwarded immediately. In conjunction with the
designation of this Park, the Developer has agreed to hand-clear the
area and place park benches on the site.
e
:..
e
The Honorable John V. Torcaso
Mayor of the City of Winter Springs
Re: Winter Springs Development Corp.
November 10, 1982
Page two.
2. As part of the rezoning of the old school site to a Park
site, the Developer has agreed to add "Phase 7" to the amenities
package previously committed to the City. At such time as three
thousand lots have been developed, then the Developer has agreed to
add one baseball field and two soccer fields to the Park (old school
site) location.
3. As part of Request "A" certain properties have now been
zoned for Multi-Family Housing Development. It is agreed that, in
accordance with prior understandings, the Developer will limit the
development of the newly zoned property to no more than twelve Units
per acre.
As to Request "B", which was granted by the Commission, the
Developer has agreed as follows:
~ 1. The newly rezoned property will be limited to six Units
per acre and shall be designated as "patio homes". The Developer has
agreed to provide detailed site buffering plans for the perimeter of
the property, which will include a visual barrier which is at least
fifty percent obscure when the first living unit gets a Certificate
of Occupancy and should be designed to be seventy-five percent obscure
and at least five-feet high, two years later.
2. The Developer has agreed that prior to submitting its final
development plan to the Planning and Zoning Board for approval, it
shall inform the Homeowners Association of its plans so that the home-
owners can adequately present their views to the Planning and Zoning
Board prior to the approval of the final development plan. All sub-
missions will be in accordance with the existing Planned Unit Develop-
ment ordinance for the City of Winter Springs.
As you are aware, the Developer had made the commitment that in
the event all three requests were approved by the Commission, then the
Developer would not seek any further redesignation of additional single-
family property to Condominium within the P.U.D. Inasmuch as Request
"c" was denied, then the Developer has reserved its right to apply for
future rezoning of property within the P.U.D. if it becomes necessary
or desirable by the Developer.
~
BROAD AND CASSEL
"
.
e
The Honorable John V. Trocaso
Mayor of the City of Winter Springs
Re: Winter Springs Development Corp.
November 10, 1982
Page three.
Again, I would like to thank you for the courtesies extended
by the Commission at the meeting, and if you require any additional
information, please contact me at your convenience.
s~~er~y yours,
C1
C. Ken Bisho ,;7
CKB:ml
cc:
To Commissioners:
Mr. Jim Hartman
Mr. Buck Adkins
Mr. Martin Trencher
Ms. Maureen Boyd
Ms. Leanne Grove
e
cc: Mr. Roy T. Dye
Mr. Jay Alpert
Ms. Jacqueline Koch,
City Planner
~s. Mary Norton,
City Clerk
e
BROAD AND CASSEL
-
.
e
~
.<
, ..
.~
,,' ~\NTER' "
.\ cfr=',~"
'I;'I !~"''''' .. 't- .'
'0,. '" ~. ',,?',
,U D . ,,''''.,
" ~. '
" .\ l.;
<~~ ~(i!s-'
. ~ ,-to ~,~~':..~. :::
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
400 NORTH EDGEMON AVENUE
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708
Telephone (305) 327,1800
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE is hereby given by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs,
Florida, that said Commission will hold a public hearing to consider a request
of Winter Springs Development Corp. for amendment to the approved preliminary
development plan of the Tuscawilla Planned Unit Development: (A) to redesignate
16 acre Park site east of Howell Creek to condominium and 14 acre school site on
Trotwood to park; (B) to redesignate 44 acres of the commercial site between
Northern Way and Winter Springs Boulevard to condominium; (C) to redesignate a
43 acre single family site to condominium, south of Bear Creek, north of Winter
Springs Boulevard, and west of the eastern end of Northern Way.
The Public Hearing will be held at 7:30 p. m. on November 9, 1982, or as soon
thereafter as possible in the Commission Chamber, City Hall, 400 N. ~dgemon Ave.,
Winter Springs, Fl.
Interested parties may appear at this hearing and be heard.
Please be advised that, under State Law, if you decide to appeal a decision
made with respect to this matter, you will need a record of the proceedings and
may need to ensure that a verbatim record,is made.
Dated this 13th day of October, 1982.
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
~;.~
Ma ry T. Norton,
City Clerk
.....
e
i~
~111~~il\,'illil
November 4. 1982
WINTER SPRINGS DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION
1 ~OO Winter Springs Bouleva,d
Winter Springs. Florida 32708
(305) 365-3252
Art Harris. President
Tuscawilla Homeowner's Association
Re: Planning Committee Meeting
7:00 PH. November 3. 1982
Dear Art:
e
At last night's Homeowner's Association pl~ning committee meeting.
Winter Springs Development Corporation ~reed to amend and further
elaborate on its requests to modify th~Tuscawilla preliminary deve10p-
rrent plan, in the fOllowing ways: /
~~ A five +/- acre tract along Bear Breek to be redesignated
park and added to request "A" (the parks proposal) for a
passive picnic park.
2. On the North commercial site. request liB", Winter Springs
Development Corporation agreed to accept a redesignation
to patio homes with a maximum density of 6 units per acre
in lieu of the requested condominium redesignation with
a maximum density of 12 units per acre.
.
3. On tract "C". request IIC", east of Howell Creek and bounded
by Northern Way and Winter Springs Boulevard, Winter Springs
Development Corporation agreed to accept a redesignation to
townhouses with a maximum density of 8 units per acre in
lieu of the requested condomini urn redesi gnation wi th a
maximum density of 12 units per acre.
4. As a further clarification of its position Winter Springs
Development Corporation stated that the present requests for
modifications to the preliminary development plan were intended
to be comprehensive,in nature; that is to say, Winter Springs
Development Corporation has no future plans to ask for the
redesignation of additional single family property to condominium.
S "ncere 1y,
;)
Ja B. Alpe
Vice President - Operations
WINTER SPRINGS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
JBA/sd
.
-
.
.
~ :",
November 9t 1982
WINTER SPRINGS DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION
1500 Winter Springs Boulevard
Win1e' Springs. Florida 32708
(305) 365-3252
B.G. Adkins
Commissioner
City of Winter Springs
400 North Edgemon Avenue
Winter Springst F1 32708
Re: Architectural Control of Proposed Patio Homes
Across from Lots 1-8 Unit 9A - Tuscawi1la
Dear Buck:
Winter Springs Development Corporation shares your concern
that the proposed patio homes be designed in such a way that
they don't intrude on the privacy of the single family homes
on Lots 1-8t Unit 9A. Winter Springs Development Corporation
commits to control the design of these patio homes so that
they are as unobtrusive as possible.
S; cerelYt
(/1
J~7B~p~r~~J
Vice preside~ - Operations
WINTER SPRINGS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
JBA/sd
. .
- To:' Winter Springs Ci ty Commission
November 13, 1982
e
We, the undersigned, formally request a reconsideration of the
decision made by the Winter Springs City Commission on November 9, 1982,
to allow the rezoning of the North Commercial area between Northern
Way and Winter Springs Boulevard, to multi-family at 6/acre. This
appeal is based on the fact that the above referenced rezontng devi-
ates from the original PUD plan, to have isolated areas of multi-family
separated by open space, and other lowinl:ensity development. Further-
more, the Winter Springs City Co~~ission chose to ignorethe following.
1. The Winter Springs Town Planner, Jackie Koch, advised the City Coun-
cil that the above change would be inconsistent with the original PUD
concept of Tuscawi11a, since it would group 137 acres of multi-family
dwellings.
2. In October, 1982, the Winter Springs Zoning Board ~~animous1y rejec-
ted a very similar proposal for multi-family at 12/acre. They were
never given the opportunity to comment on the 6/acre proposal.
~ The Tuscawi11a Homeowners Association and residents held a meeting
on November 1+, 1982, where a straw vote was taken on the six/acre pro-
posal. It was rejected by a nearly unanimous vote.
u. A second straw vote was taken at the November 9, 1982, TOH~ Coun-
cil meeting, and the results were the same. A nearly unanimous rejec-
tion of the proposal was ignored.
~ One and a half years ago, Winter Springs Development Company was
allowed to rezone a large single family area on the far east end of
Winter Springs Boulevard, where it will join Rte. 426. At that time,
the board would not allow the rezoning of the North Commercial area
to multi-family, because they were displacing a single family area.
It seems that this is still a valid argument.
6. It appears that at least one of the three board members who proposed
and voted for multi-family in the previously zoned commercial area,
may have had a conflict of interest. Burley Adkins, who is one of the
fourteen Tuscawi11a builders, should have abstained. Martine Trencher
voted approval as a lame duck commissioner. The third vote came from
Jim Hartman, also a builder.
We respectfully request that the Winter Springs City Commission
reconsider their vote, and do everything possible to reverse the damage
done to the Tuscawi11a homeowners. That area should be rezoned to sin-
gle family. Without your help, the integrity;of the original PUD is
compromised. We appreciate the time and effort that you have given
this decision, and we hope that you will consider this plea favovab1y.
Thank you for your time and your consideration.
WtY-n~ 177 tLll Sl~~ ~tn-J ~ Mt 6...cL
dfl)7~: ~~4, 4~-l ,I/Ye, .vii. . Qt. Respectfully, n...
-::;::1?~~~' /<!/z7~o)tai-.t;li~s~
- < /' /G . lJf+~e..55
e
./
~ t. l~hf~ \44~ ~+, L(LLV'-QJ~.~.
a /Ll4~ ,'M. ot~ a.
7~ " 6?,.'~ }#}'1fii,~ /)1,
~Pl/~ t:.9'7 ~~ &
· :Vj.~ 017 ~CG
.,Jfo~ ~J3 C~0t
,-\v\~ l-'. iliQr.- (, q 5 c~ ur.
/~: /~:!: 1~3B ~r. (~:q:~~~Ofl c+
F J~ [, r<~ 1<t3?)n:{~ ~
~~ 113(, 'm~~9A,
'. ~~~~~~ \~'\o ~.~~~ ".D.-
I?~ rf3. W /141. U~/t6L -VI(. ..
~;f,' . 14Z3 I-Ur; 4u~t:...P/L e
EI~ /f32- /J1C ~~ ~
~.uu...r V~ /'13: /YJ7: L"IlAu<,- [)~.
Noc.... r eY\rA.. t:1 h", (" lh &"'-0 f'l Co ......r .
~/1t; /W3 ~.;:/~;),.
~ ~ r ~~ /Y'Cf) //7LT: ~ A ~
7J1~ ~~ l<<dM ~At.
fM( ~ N'f]H{~(}."
~ / · 1'1-:;'/ /1,i/~ & ~1 ~
~ ~ I '~~_
~, ({j3t fYLb. ~M, ~ S22:~
f~~ L0C;I~C/; ~ ~ i~;'
~ 01/ "I f/"/r @//. ~\ z ~
j~e.Q' . 14lD'1 ML,L~~ (C~~
. - I
. . to' frio
e
e
.
",
To~ Winter Springs City Commission
November 13, 1982
vJe, the undersigned, formally request a reconsideration of the
decision made by the Winter Springs City Commission on November 9, 1982,
to allow the rezoning of the North Commercial area between Northern
Way and Winter Springs Boulevard, to multi-family at 6/acre. This
appeal is based on the fact that the above referenced rezontng devi-
ates from the original PUD plan, to have isolated areas of multi-family
separated by open space, and other lowintensity development. Further-
more, the Winter Springs City Commission chose to ignorethe fo~lowing.
1. The Winter Springs Town Planner, Jackie Koch, advised the City Coun-
cil that the above change would be inconsistent with the original PUD
concept of Tuscawilla, since it would group 137 acres of "multi-family
dwellings.
2. In October, 1982, the Winter Springs Zoning Board unanimously rejec-
ted a very similar proposal for multi-family at 12/acre. They were
never given the opportunity to comment on the 6/acre proposal.
~ The Tuscawilla Homeowners Association and residents held a meeting
on November 4, 1982, where a straw vote was taken on the six/acre pro-
posal. It was rejected by a nearly unanimous vote. ~
u. A second straw vote was taken at the November 9, 1982, Town Coun-
cil meeting, and the results were the same. A nearly unanimous rejec-
tion of the proposal was ignored.
~ One and a half years ago, Winter Springs Development Company was
allowed to rezone a large single family area on the far east end of
Winter Springs Boulevard, where it will join Rte. 426. At that time,
the board would not allow the rezoning of the North Commercial area
to multi-family, because they were displacing a single family area.
It seems that this is still a valid argument.
~ It appears that at least one of the three board members who proposed
and voted for multi-family in the previously zoned commercial area,
may have had a conflict of interest. Burley Adkins, who is one of the
fourteen Tuscawilla builders, should have abstained. Martine Trencher
voted approval as a lame duck commissioner. The third vote came from
Jim Hartman, also a builder.
We respectfully request that the Winter Springs City Commission
reconsider their vote, and do everything possible to reverse the damage
done to the Tuscawilla homeowners. That area should be rezoned to sin-
gle family. Without your help, the integrity.' of the original PUD is
compromised. We appreciate the time and effort that you have given
this decision, and we hope that you will consider this plea favobably~ .
,T;jkj you ~Or,Y:i~ .~(i~~, an~~~'f-:~i~>e,r~/tion.
'j Y-.. --r..).A' "C 1,J.,/~ C /-t" /i. 1/ ~, . -I:..L_ I.. ) R tf 11
- .7 .- /' / .,' '.- ',-' espec u y,
/~;,. ;/"'/1("" . -;,--c/, (?:~"'c:..;'./?~.-~)--<: 1./, Z;" ~-L.-' Your Constituents
;.' / 1/ y[/ I' I, ';/,'-; "
J ./ ~~" .....--f. I, .')
1'\ 1~...r-1," -' t0t-.y~,
~~. ,J' ;
,'~&u .~.:.uY~>-)/
, \
/] 1 ' - .-'7 -? ,
(<1 _ /".-<-v.~
Iii
. .
: \-; f' f', "
Lv . L.X...'4-'~;-'-j'l.l ~
II
. " j). If
7[,L' ";; ( ~t{,L((/"-(-""
.
page 1
.
"
. ....
. To:. Winter Springs City Commission
November 13, 1982
-
We, the undersigned, formally request a reconsideration of the
decision made by the Winter Springs City Commission on November 9, 1982,
to allow the rezoning of the North Commercial area between Northern
Way and Winter Springs Boulevard, to multi-family at 6/acre. This
appeal is based on the fact that the above referenced rezontng devi-
ates from the original PUD plan, to have isolated areas of multi-family
separated by open space, and other lowlmensity development. Further-
more, the Winter Springs City Co~~ission chose to ignorethe following.
1. The Winter Springs Town Planner, Jackie Koch, advised the City Coun-
cil that the above change would be inconsistent with the original PUD
concept of Tuscawilla, since it would group 137 acres of multi-family
dwellings.
2. In October, 1982, the Winter Springs Zoning Board unanimously rejec-
ted a very similar proposal for multi-family at 12/acre. They were
never given the opportunity to comment on the 6/acre proposal.
~ The Tuscawilla Homeowners Association and residents held a meeting
on November 4, 1982, where a straw vote was taken on the six/acre pro-
Dosal. It was rejected by a nearly unanimous vote.
Ii. A second straw vote was taken at the November 9, 1982, Town Coun-
cil meeting, and the ~esults were the same. A nearly unanimous rejec-
tion of the proposal was ignored.
~ One and a half years ago, Winter Springs Development Company was
allowed to rezone a large single family area on the far east end of
Winter Springs Boulevard, where it will join Rte. 426. At that time,
the board would not allow the rezoning of the North Commercial area
to multi-family, because they were displacing a single family area.
It seems that this is still a valid argument.
6. It appears that at least one of the three board members who proposed
and voted for multi-family in the previously zoned commercial area,
may have had a conflict of interest. Burley Adkins, who is one of the
fourteen Tuscawilla builders, should have abstained. Martine Trencher
voted approval as a lame duck commissioner. The third vote came from
Jim Hartman, also a builder.
We respectfully request that the Winter Springs City Commission
reconsider their vote, and do everything possible to reverse the damage
done to the Tuscawilla homeowners. That area should be rezoned to sin-
gle family. Without your help, the integri ty~' of the original PUD is
compromised. We appreciate the time and effort that you have given
this decision, and we hope that you will consider this plea favovably.
Thank you for your time and your consideration.
e
Respectfully,
Your Constituents
tu /H'~<PV'" fov/V (" 3;;Z?o~
w<< f ~J;tl t-izt!J>
.. .-
. . toft.~€ .
5),1 ~ J.1 ~--J- 1!>7L ~ ~ ~-t
-Jlmss ~tt:J3;;.~~' := ..'
. (, ',: -. (j{'j' ." hn ~Lpth-<P q~
U>-U/Ufl5S O~~/? r'2.-rJ \ r'\ ~ <1.- l
_. ~~7 L -PU ..111 ~ . ~,/_~__\.cLI.." '-'- L~.. l . Y --'. - . - --
_4u "-'-. 1YI'!L.t5 & 77 ~./ /9'1..
U-J-Ctv.::>S /) 12 / - ,~ (\ ~ --~- n
'/12//1-/ ~_ Y,U(jA. i-. /\j L. ""J4.~ ~. .-=-...,.. L.LtLL..-
O~ b~tJ- l4.1CoR...~ j)~.
R 0[",0,1- "S 12~~ 1:3 t'''1 ~ S'~ ~,
-=- ~ I 10 5', U...
/YV~ /vIt-j~ ~
--
.
--
/
page2
To~ Winter Springs City Commission
November 13, 1982
We, the undersigned, formally request a reconsideration of the
decision made by the Winter Springs City Commission on November 9, 1982,
4It to allow the rezoning of the North Commercial area between Northern
Way and Winter Springs Boulevard, to multi-family at 6/acre. This
appeal is based on the fact that the above referenced rezontng devi-
ates from the original PUD plan, to have isolated areas of multi-family
separated by open space, and other lowlntensity development. Further-
more, the Winter Springs City Commission chose to ignorethe following.
~ The Winter Springs Town Planner, Jackie Koch, advised the City Coun-
cil that the above change would be inconsistent with the original PUD
concept of Tuscawilla, since it would group 137 acres of multi-family
dwellings.
2. In October, 1982, the Winter Springs Zoning Board unanimously rejec-
ted a very similar proposal for multi-family at 12/acre. They were
never given the opportunity to comment on the 6/acre proposal.
~ The Tuscawilla Homeowners Association and residents held a meeting
on November 4, 1982, where a straw vote was taken on the six/acre pro-
posal. It was rejected by a nearly unanimous vote.
h. A second straw vote was taken at the November 9, 1982, Tow'1 Coun-
cil meeting, and the ::>esults were the same. A nearly unanimous rejec-
tion of the proposal was ignored.
~ One and a half years ago, Winter Springs Development Company was
allowed to rezone a large single family area on the far east end of
Winter Springs Boulevard, where it will join Rte. 426. At that time,
the board would not allow the rezoning of the North Commercial area
to multi-flli~ily, because they were displacing a single family area.
It seems that this is still a valid argument.
tit ~ It appears that at least one of the three board members who proposed
and voted for multi-family in the previously zoned commercial area,
may have had a conflict of interest. Burley Adkins, who is one of the
fourteen Tuscawilla builders, should have abstained. Martine Trencher
voted approval as a lame duck commissioner. The third vote came from
Jim Hartman, also a builder.
We respectfully request that the Winter Springs City Commission
reconsider their vote, and do everything possible to reverse the damage
done to the Tuscawilla homeowners. That area should be rezoned to sin-
gle family. Without your help, the integrit~'of the original PUD is
compromised. We appreciate the time and effort that you have given
this decision, and we hope that you will consider this plea favovably.
Thank you for your time and your consideration.
w'1"(v~'7'>'7j) ~(1?m"u M. ~ Is,~~~_ ~!?
IJ
/
Respectfully,
Your Constituents
/
.~
!,/ C
L-N' ...._/ ~
W',~
~).
tv,~
W.S.
o
to,S.
. .
'. To-: 'V-Jinter Springs Ci ty Commission
November 13, 1982
e
We, the undersigned, formally request a reconsideration of the
decision made by the \tiinter Springs City Commission on November 9, 1982,
to allow the rezoning of the North Commercial area between Northern
Way and Winter Springs Boulevard, to multi-family at 6/acre. This
appeal is based on the fact that the above referenced rezontng devi-
ates from the original PUD plan, to have isolated areas of multi-family
separated by open space, and other lowintensity development. Further-
more, the Winter Springs City Commission chose to ignorethe following.
1. The Winter Springs Town Planner, Jackie Koch, advised the City Coun-
cil that the above change would be inconsistent with the original PUD
concept of Tuscawilla, since it would group 137 acres of multi-family
dwellings.
2. In October, 1982, the Winter Springs Zoning Board unanimously rejec-
ted a very similar proposal for multi-family at 12/acre. They were
never given the opportunity to comment on the 6/acre proposal.
~ The Tuscawilla Homeowners Association and residents held a meeting
on November 4, 1982, where a straw vote was taken on the six/acre pro-
posal. It was rejected by a nearly unanimous vote.
u.. A second straw vote was taken at the November 9, 1982, Tow'1 Coun-
cil meeting, and the results were the same. A nearly unanimous rejec-
tion of the proposal was ignored.
~ One and a half years ago, Winter Springs Development Company was
allowed to rezone a large single family area on the far east end of
Winter Springs Boulevard, where it will join Rte. 426. At that time,
the board would not allow the rezoning of the North Commercial area
to multi-family, because they were displacing a single family area.
It seems that this is still a valid argument.
6. It appears that at least one of the three board members who proposed
and voted for multi-family in the previously zoned commercial area,
may have had a conflict of interest. Burley Adkins, who is one of the
fourteen Tuscawilla builders, should have abstained. Martine Trencher
voted approval as a lame duck commissioner. The third vote came from
Jim Hartman, also a builder.
We respectfully request that the Winter Springs City Commission
reconsider their vote, and do everything possible to reverse the damage
done to the Tuscawilla homeowners. That area should be rezoned to sin-
gle family. Without your help, the integrity~of the original PUD is
compromised. We appreciate the time and effort that you have given
this decision, and we hope that you will consider this plea favobably.
Thank you for your time and your consideration.
..
Respectfully,
Your Constituents
"
::l)iV I ~
11 r- '< G"-l.l"-1:iftf-L. ~, -r~\l2'~
. .......- -.... '1 _~'-.f"-,,_, . c,(., 9 --;....J <>C'_~~Jl
/':'t-L'i)jA,) ";1 8cV/sj ~,
. '1 A' . ./
. ~ ~'- .... .......
,,'
\]J"~
.~~
J~
page 1
e
.
", .
. .... ,
'.'To-: -Winter Springs City Commission
November 13, 1982
We, the undersigned, formally request a reconsideration of the
decision made by the Winter Springs City Co~~ission on November 9, 1982,
to allow the rezoning of the North Commercial area between Northern
Way and Winter Springs Boulevard, to multi-fa~ily at 6/acre. This
appeal is based on the fact that the above referenced rezontng devi-
ates from the original PUD plan, to have isolated areas of multi-family
separated by open space, and other lOwtntensity development. Further-
more, the Winter Springs City Commission chose to ignorethe following.
1. The Winter Springs Town Planner, Jackie Koch, advised the City Coun-
cil that the above change would be inconsistent with the original PUD
concept of Tuscawilla, since it would group 137 acres of multi-family
dwellings.
2. In October, 1982, the Winter Springs Zoning Board unanimously rejec-
ted a very similar proposal for multi-family at 12/acre. They were
never given the opportunity to comment on the 6/acre proposal.
~ The Tuscawilla Homeowners Association and residents held a meeting
on November 4, 1982, where a straw vote was taken on the six/acre pro-
posal. It was rejected by a nearly unanimous vote.
u. A second straw vote was taken at the November 9, 1982, Tow~ COW1-
cil meeting, and the results were the same. A nearly unanimous rejec-
tion of the proposal was ignored.
~ One and a half years ago, Winter Springs Development Company was
allowed to rezone a large single family area on the far east end of
Winter Springs Boulevard, where it will join Rte. 426. At that time,
the board would not allow the rezoning of the North Commercial area
to multi-family, because they were displacing a single family area.
It seems that this is still a valid argument.
6. It appears that at least one of the three board members who proposed
and voted for multi-family in the previously zoned commercial area,
may have had a conflict of interest. Burley Adkins, who is one of the
fourteen Tuscawilla builders, should have abstained. Martine Trencher
voted approval as a lame duck commissioner. The third vote came from
Jim Hartman, also a builder.
We respectfully request that the Winter Springs City Commission
reconsider their vote, and do everything possible to reverse the damage
done to the Tuscawilla homeowners. That area should be rezoned to sin-
gle family. Without your help, the integrity~of the original PUD is
compromised. We appreciate the time and effort that you have given
this decision, and we hope that you will consider this plea favobably.
Thank you for your time and your consideration.
Respectfully,
Your Constituents
.
-
page 1
SENTINEL STAR
Publi~h{>d Daih-
-\Itamontf' Sprin~s~ Sf'minole Count~.. Florida
~tatc of .1Florioa (
,ell',.T\" OF ORA:\'GE \
ss
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared_______".
Naomi C. Parks
_. ________, who on oath says that
ADVERTISING CHARGE~2. 30
CITY OF ,~~$!!~.ER, ..A.SPRINGS,
NOTICE OF iliiGc HEARING
NOTICE ,s her~ii.~ by the City
CommIssIon "of'1:ti'e;i.':"Clty of Winter
Springs, Florida.,t,*"said C'1y Com-
mIssion will hdfd - 'S ''Public heating to
consider 'a req~ ~of Winter Springs
Development.Corp. for~ amendment to
the approved preliminary developm,ent
plan of the Tuscawilla Planned.~
Development (A) to redesignate 16
acre Park site east of Howell Creek to
condommium and 14 acre SChool site
on Trotwood to park; (B) to redes!g-
nate 44 acres of the commercial site
between Northern Way and Winter
Springs Boulevard to condominium;
(e) to redeSignate a 43 acre single
family site to condominium, south of
Bear Creek, north of Winter Springs
Boulevard, and west of the eastern
end of Northern way
The Public Hearing will be held at 7:30
p m on November 9, 1982, or as
soor~ thereafter as possible in the
CommISSion Chamber, City Hall, 400
N. Edgemon Ave., Winter Springs. FI
Illterested parties may appear at thiS
hearing and be heard
P~ease be advised that. under State
Law, if you decide to apP\~al a decI-
sion made with respect to thiS matter,
you will need a record of the proceed-
ings and may need to ensure that a
verbatim record is made
Dated thiS 13th day of Octolter,
1982
CiTY OF WINTER SPRINGS.
FLORIDA
15/ Mary T Norton
MalY T. Norton,
City Clerk
'3-66(68) Oct 19.1082
she is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Sentinel Star, a Daily newspaper
published at AItamonte Springs, in Seminole County, Florida; that the attached copy of ad-
vertisement,beinga Noti(~p of P1lblicl:learing in the matter of
Re: RC<..j1l.e.st of Wint_cr Springs Development C:orp~~_
was published in said newspaper in the issues of..
OCt. 1~.LJ982 ________
~n the____.. ____._ Court,
Affiant further says that the said Sentinel Star is a newspaper published at Al-
tamonte Springs, in said Seminole County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has
heretofore been continuously published in said Seminole County, Florida, each Week
Day and has been entered as second-class mail matter at the post office in Altamonte
Springs, in said Seminole County, Florida for a period of one year next preceding the
first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant fu;,ther says that
he/she has neither paid nor promised any person, fiml or corporation any discount,
rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for pub-
lication in the said newsp;M5er2,.'.1Id
/ ;i!i .
/ j
, //", ./: . .,'
':t ,f.~2CL
.r '__
Sworn to and subscribed before me this
day of
October
,/..-\
\ J:.."
'1 ~--'
~~7~-
'.--"(
Id'-'-:.-W
~
(!' l:~;~~
21st
---A, D" 19...82..
'J"'......,
D
,
Nly CornlT1iSSiOn Expires Jan.
St0t'2
'(
, ~:::;'-;~~~
at L3rge
Zl, 190Q
FORM 291 C