The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2009 07 13 Public Hearings 500 Aesthetic Review Modification For The Greens At Tuskawilla COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM 500 Consent Information Public Hearin X Re ular July 13, 2009 Meeting MGR ~ /De t. REQUEST: The Community Development Department requests the Commission consider the aesthetic review modification for The Greens at Tuskawilla, a 60 unit condominium development on approximately 12.02 acres, located on the south side of Winter Springs Boulevard, adjacent to Howell Creek, and immediately adjacent to the Tuscawilla Golf and Country Club. PURPOSE: The purpose of this Agenda Item is for the Commission to consider modifying the aesthetic review for The Greens at Tuskawilla, by removing the faux-chimneys, since there aze no fireplaces in the units. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: • Chapter 163, Florida Statutes • Chapter 166, Florida Statutes • Comprehensive Plan • Chapter 9, City Code • Section 9-601. Approval prerequisite for permits. • Section 9-605. Submittal requirements. • Forth Amendment to Settlement Agreement (City of Winter Springs, React Land , LLC, and Winter Springs Golf, LLC). CHRONOLOGY: Final Order approving Settlement Agreement and amended Settlement Agreement No. 1, recorded April 14, 1994 in Official Record Book 3102, Page 1354, Public Records of Seminole County, Florida. Second Amendment to Settlement Agreement recorded October 22, -1996 in Official Record Book 3156, Page 0454, Public Records of Seminole County, Florida. Conceptual approval for 60 residential condominium units (15 buildings), with the 4 garages in each building opening onto an internal courtyazd, and on-street parking was approved by the City Commission on September 10, 2007, subject to conditions. July 13; X009 ' Regulaz Item 500 Page 2 of 3 Third Amendment to Settlement Agreement approved by the City Commission October 2, 2007 and recorded December 5, 2007 in Official Record Book 06881, pages 235-270, Public Records of Seminole County. [This amendment allows the development of the "development area" of parcel 7 into a maximum of 60 condominium units.] Combined preliminary and final engineering/site plan was received on January 30, 2008 and reviewed at the February 19, 2008 staff review. A site plan resubmittal was received on March 12, 2008 and reviewed at the April 15, 2008 Staff review. A site plan resubmittal was received on May 29, 2008 and reviewed at the July 1, 2008 staff review. At this review, staff conveyed the City Attorney's opinion that the project could proceed through the Part "A" PUD procedures. A meeting among staff, the applicant, his attorney, and the City Attorney was held on July 8, 2008 to address the development agreement, the potential for a variance or waiver, conservation easements, and removal of specimen trees. A site plan resubmittal was received on July 17, 2008 and scheduled for review at the August 5, 2008 staff review (staff comments were provided to the applicant; by mutual consent between the applicant and City, no staff review was held on August 5; the applicant provided responses to staff comments). Plans for modification of the tennis courts were received on August 1, 2008 and scheduled for the August 19, 2008 staff review. The PUD master plan, preliminary and final PUD development plan, and preliminary and final engineering/site plan all received recommendations of approval from the Planning and Zoning Board on August 21, 2008. The PUD master plan, preliminary and final PUD development plan, and preliminary and final engineering/site plan were approved by the City Commission on September 8, 2008. Aesthetic review was approved by the City Commission on January 26, 2009. CONSIDERATIONS: The applicant's representative has approached staff with the request to modify the aesthetic review to remove the non-functional chimneys (2 chimneys on each of the 15 buildings). He states that the units were not designed to have fireplaces, that the chimneys have no utilitarian purpose, and that the faux-chimneys make the roofs more prone to leaks. Staff sees no problem with the request. The buildings still appear largely the same and the proposal does not violate code. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Commission approve the aesthetic review modification for removing the faux-chimneys at The Greens at Tuskawilla. 2 • July 13, 2009 ` Regular Item 500 Page 3 of 3 ATTACHMENTS: A -Proposed Elevations without chimneys B -Approved Aesthetic Review -pertinent pages from original submittal COMMISSION ACTION: 3 s i t SHEET NOTES ELEVATION DETM.B ~ ER9tmN~TMmHIROBFRQ xolr~ L P6HITONETMMPoRWININICIpN ANIBCB c neri~roN~TeAaN RNOOOnAw nrooweamua o. oae+rRASIeIroEanwon~narAHex fir{EN1EnUlE E Po/OeNEL1nE70EC0aleNRWI ut ones wNOOwTxE A ooaa mE ro EIaB®OBBIIMBIBIMWC RIgR ~IN/YIHEN7W 71a170ElYNN, "r n^. EEBPMTIOe\COIIeYAn11nY meErwNEUea mwenElm~Er nnr,uxa vaNaoooxsmxAVE Tnel a TaP afEr. ~ wrNaE To /1YYE 11E1 ON 1Q { n0I101101LY. = ICY NOTES ELEVATION DETAILS n mAU~aAOUefEaar~NwN M/LW CIrEYEAOiE~Il00FINNli®L tMENEN/IrNNYMaA710e ENeasiEarEaawrnxa e amaEaAOCaIENENSaNwo wAUA~NN'®EANAEaNNPlaak7al. aNiEnNONrret~nAmx imeBelEarEeeAmrnNa n N~NOwAOawvENreAAe a. rowNAmeeNrmaNammEwu TxewomnTE NNOOaNN11EEeMA mm~emevww~aoN,uNa E CGxOFTEI~lnaofN'NBl E ea~Ne~arNauieAm. EAEm NgrEwn NNACIIW IeG110N1alNNONO NINE N. EIEIBEY9RPalATIICNM GYLNI BffTAi1i n N/I761i00N11Yplt ALLeOMWPWO ICGNe N 1Nfa1001Nf 70 E d1AE:IE ErCn.YleNtlOMMTeL n N1W 1®M110N Y N:elle)NMYMNLMI6 H. HEN191GpET. neamazNN AcwafounairaNanea rn: a NEmnEertHAnamNExawN nr~rAEmweNaNUa~n n almio~amNaEECanenAiNrAr IOMiNMNNEI n mamr n AVeMY WrQENeIgNEa VNN umanr, oaamNaa+weowaAaa i~e~iN~iENiuEnwiim~iNiw NuAranA~ aaeawaeNn oar. AOYI W E IeNINAE I~ Iaptl®dl NYLOa~EOFNWEETIW KFNYE70 aNErsxaENNawwra v feAYN10HENNEpINaE CEMENTPLASTBtLEGEND INfIg7N1) • nNEfMra1ANY NIA/M CPI - T 03e1rRATla! fPt . 71? LHe1rNANa1 ' ~ E~ y rNatuM^ ~ ~' . ARCHITECTURE d r iHTERwR oESioH, wc. r 11/M~Y ~ MdR6N! ~ NNN.NNM 1! .~.~ r~ ~=~:_ i " .~ ~, ~ y !1 The Greens at Tuscawills wtiNSpxo.,r~ 0. HOIIAIAN 6IOBN F e reTEwue ®11®M l NF&2{ ILNAIPRRB.TNA Frold 8 Rear f Ebvatlons A6.01 ~n ..._... ___.. ..._.. c 1/~+P~r 0 ~ 0 a - ,,.- , _ - - II II --- -- -- '~' s-~, --- - _ ~~,~ ~-~ ~~~ ~~~~ - ~ ~~ ~ ~' ~ D mm ~ ®-® ~ ~ ; m m mm ~' ~ V! ~ ! i GRAPHIC SCALE THE GREENS AT TUSCAWILLA + 0 2 < a FRONT ELEVATION ~'~ (IN fEEn Y y y Y A z H bd iii _ ~~ i,~~~ ~ '' 1 ~ ~, ~ ~ i ,' ~ ® a~; ~ , ,~ ~ - THE GREENS AT TUSCAWILLA REAR ELEVATION GRAPHIC SCALE ~ 0 2 4 g cg+~n GRAPHIC SCALE THE GREENS AT TUSCAWILLA + n z + e LEFT ELEVATION ~~' (IN FEET) ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ DD ,' THE GREENS AT TUSCAWILLA , GRAPHIC SCALE u z 4 g RIGHT ELEVATION ~ii -..~~ (IN FEEn T< :_ _ i •z ~ S *L ~. r ~ ~ 3 ~ W~r ~r Kj'~ ^^-.- ~ ~ y I r'i i 3 ~ ..-.._».. ;.~ r'•~ 5Y,W~„j~'t_f` ~..~"~w g #~-rr.,7... iF'}~trs'"'l~ ;~. }~^ It,~cw+~~~,-r ~~ ~ ~-}~ <,~ ~ ~~;`"-~~; ~.`ti' 4~ ~ ~ ~~ . 4,~ rt ~~~ a^.-> 1,~fly A' ~ ~ ~'""~~ R art S,G'<~~ x ~. 3+ '`~'l~~~ rsi ,'t^ ;, I ~~^'t 1 r'o-F1.~~µ; ~ Y w i' e ~ 'L~, - {r ~.. ~ rs ~ ~ ~ ~ ~s S r f ~ « .. ~ a - «. a yr-J th ~ ~ A i*~ ~' ~~ } ~': ~- c r K `iw tom. ~ ~ "s< [), C ~' `'k ~`' ~ ro ~ ', ~ •~:: } ~ :~ ~ ll r~: t4 yirR ~ s c ,i .`Jj, h {v .... 't wJ» ~ + < ~'~ y ~~, -yy 1 i 1~..{, ~z ~ti u s F'. t~ .d f t {,'~ ~ ~' e~ , fE ~ 4 +..• i. w, ~ L t , ~ }, _. ~_ ~., ~ ~' '~ a 3. ~ :'GAS ~" ~ ~, ;i 3 ~. ~:. <. ~ a f i t ~ t ;~ { ' ti:.• ~ ~ ~.:: 4 z. ) ~~ ~ ik. ~- ; - r .. i r V ~+ ~ _ ~ ti i+.4 s ~ C 4 \-~~ ~ v std fir,' ~ i ~. „ ~..~ '"'~ < ".... C ~ pic.~} - _ ~ ^. j ~ ~ i n 3, S ~ til y f Yr =y t \ i~'i _t - 1 .