Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009 04 20 EAR-Based Amendments Transportation Elementr r EAR-Based Amendments As requested, the draft elements are being distributed one-at-a-time so that you will have ample time for review, prior to the April 6 & April 20 Joint Local Planning Agency~City Commission Meetings. II. TRANSPORTATION -Staff Analysis Executive Summary Numerous revisions to the Transportation Element are being proposed to implement the EAR. The substantive changes are listed by Major Issue topic: AFFORDABLE AND WORK-FORCE HOUSING - (no new policies: no revised) ELDERLY HOUSING AND MEDICAL CARE - (no new policies: 4 revised) (Policy 1.5.6, revised from policy 1.5.5) Require new development and redevelopment to provide adequate on-site handicap accessible facilities, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and, as appropriate, transit facilities to promote safe and efficient intermodal movement options. (Policy 1.5.15, revised) Make intersections pedestrian-friendly whenever possible, by limiting the crossing width to the shortest possible distance given the characteristics of the roadway; use of adequate lighting; adequate timing for traffic signals; and the provision of facilities for the handicapped. Coordinate with FDOT and the County to implement this policy. (Policy 1.6.5, revised) Work with LYNX to improve existing bus stops, and to design new ones to include benches, bicycle parking, signage, lights, and protection from the elements. Bus stops shall also be accessible for the handicapped and elderly passenger. (Policy 1.6.6, revised) Coordinate with LYNX to accommodate riders with special needs. REDEVELOPMENT - (2 new policies: 2 revised) (Policy 1.5.3, revised) Require both new development and substantial redevelopment to provide adequate safe pedestrian facilities on-site, to adjacent sites as practical, and in adjacent right-of- way. Such facilities shall include lighted sidewalks along both sides of all internal roadways and, as appropriate, on the development side of adjacent roadways. Additionally, mitigation or elimination of existing pedestrian hazards (e.g. upgrading an intersection) may be required, as needed and dependent upon the magnitude of the development or redevelopment project. In lieu of providing these systems, the developer may contribute funds quid pro quo for use by the City for funding expansion of similar systems. (Cross Reference: See Capital Improvements Element, Policy 1.4.5) (Policy 1.5.7, revised from policy 1.5.6) Require new development and redevelopment to provide safe, well lit, and efficient on-site motorized and non-motorized traffic movements, parking, and, as applicable, connections to adjacent sites and rights-of-way. (Policy 1.5.18, new) Encourage the implementation of the S.R. 434 Crosstown bus route and linkage to the planned Central Florida Commuter Rail (SunRail). (Policy 1.6.7, new) Inventory sidewalks within one-quarter to one-half mile of the new LYNX Crosstown bus route to identify missing links in the pedestrian system. Implement new sidewalks where sidewalks do not exist or where sidewalks are in disrepair and are hazardous, as funding becomes available to provide access to transit and promote ridership. STATE ROAD 434 CORRIDOR - (b new policies; 4 revised) (Policy 1.1.8, new) Coordinate with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) regarding methods by which the pedestrian orientation of the Town Center can be achieved. This coordination may include the possible reclassification of S.R. 434 through the Town Center as a Class II or Class III arterial, the potential designation of the facility west of Vistawilla Drive as one where it would be appropriate to apply a policy constraint prohibiting future widening of the roadway, and~or examining the appropriateness of lowering the speed limit along a portion of the roadway. (Policy 1.2.2, revised) Require joint use access and cross access easements, except where they would be infeasible, to encourage interconnectivity between developments and to reduce congestion on arterials and collector roads. (Policy 1.2.3, revised) Encourage the interconnection of collector roads on the street network to provide residents with alternative routes and the potential fora reduction in vehicle miles traveled. (Policy 1.2.7, revised) Utilize appropriate access management alternative techniques to control arterial road access, reduce congestion, and preserve LOS. These techniques include but are not limited to the following: • Limit access to roads by controlling the number and location of site access driveways; ~ Cross access easements fo adjacent properties where feasible; and • Use of frontage or back-lot parallel access roads where feasible. (Policy 1.2.14, new) Coordinate with FDOT to appropriately re-classify S.R. 434 within the Winter Springs Town Center Corridor as a Class II or Class III arterial based on the increased density of traffic signals along S.R. 434. (Cross Reference: See Transportation Element, Policy 1.1.8) (Policy 1.3.3, revised) Require new development and substantial redevelopment to connect to existing adjacent roadways, bicycle facilities, and sidewalks or otherwise "stub-out" to future development sites, except when such connections would be patently inappropriate. (Policy 1.9.6, new) Work with FDOT and Seminole County to make low speed urban street design the normal, default practice for street construction, reconstruction, or modification within the Town Center. These urban street design features shall include, but not be limited to, wide, unencumbered sidewalks, narrow motor-vehicle lanes, street trees, prominent crosswalks, tight turning radii, and very limited use of turn lanes. The City shall encourage the same policy be adopted and implemented by these entities for their roadway segments within the Town Center. (Policy 1.9.8, new) Coordinate with the Florida Department of Transportation regarding a reduction in the speed limit on S.R. 434 in the Town Center, when warranted, to better reflect the pedestrian-friendly environment being created in the Town Center. (Cross Reference: See Transportation Element, Policy 1.1.8) (Policy 1.9.9, new) Discourage the widening of S.R. 434 west of Vistawilla Drive. (Cross Reference: See Transportation Element, Policy 1.1.8) (Policy 1.1 1.6, new) Consider conducting a study to determine the feasibility of implementing a Transportation concurrency Exception Area (TCEA), Multimodal Transportation District (MMTD), or similar concurrency management alternative(s) for the Town Center, Greenway Interchange District, and the developable land between the two areas, to encourage urban infill development. Such a study, following coordination with FDOT regarding the methodology, may include: • Establishing whether concurrency management alternatives are appropriate to help achieve the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan; • Investigating the implementation of similar systems in jurisdictions with similar characteristics and issues; • Establishing guidelines for granting exceptions to transportation concurrency for urban infill development, urban redevelopment, downtown revitalization, or similar purpose allowed by Florida Statutes; • Evaluating possible mobility strategies that promote the purposes for which an exception may be proposed; and • Determining specific steps that would need to be undertaken by the City. GREENEWAY INTERCHANGE EMPLOYMENT DISTRICT - (3 new policies; no revised) (Policy 1.2.15, new) Support the widening of S.R. 434 to 4-lanes from S.R. 417 to S.R. 426 in the City of Oviedo. (Cross Reference: See Intergovernmental Coordination Element, Policy 1.3.1) (Policy 1.5.17, new) Adopt a Greenway Interchange District (GID) master circulation plan prior to the issuance of any development approval in the portion of the GID west of S.R. 417. (Policy 1.5.20, new) Consider the feasibility of a transportation route along S.R. 434 connecting the Town Center and the Greenway Interchange District, with the proposed facility to be limited to transit, bicycle, and~or pedestrian access. Environmental feasibility and traffic circulation would be the primary effort of the initial consideration. If permitting issues are not found to be insurmountable, astudy may be performed to address issues such as potential routes and potential funding sources for capital and operating costs, and additional factors for a transit component such as operating agency, headways, hours of operation, projected ridership, and pricing. POPULATION, HOUSING DENSITY AND GREENSPACE - (2 new policies; 6 revised) (Policy 1.1.5, revised and simplified) Evaluate proposed development for transportation concurrency using established criteria. (Policy 1.1.7, new) Continue to use standards and guidelines for permitting the payment of proportionate fair-share contributions to mitigate locally and regionally significant transportation impacts consistent with Subsection 163.3180(16), F.S. Such standards and guidelines shall provide that the City shall not rely on transportation facilities in place or under actual construction more than three years after the issuance of a building permit, except as provided in Subsection 163.3180(16), F.S. (Policy 1.3.8, revised [previously was policy 1.3.9]) Prohibit the creation of landlocked parcels. Nonresidential parcels shall be required to have right-of-way frontage or an adequate access easement (such as in out-parcels in shopping centers). (Policy 1.5.9, revised from policy 1.5.8) Require that new development be compatible with and further the achievement of the Transportation Element. Requirements for compatibility may include, but are not limited to providing clearly delineated routes through parking lots to safely accommodate pedestrian and bicycle circulation. (Policy 1.5.12, revised from policy 1.5.1 1) Require an effective and safe pedestrian circulation system as a part of any new public or private roadway design and construction. Such a system shall be given major consideration in any substantial road improvement project. (Policy 1.8.2, revised) Allow the incursion of a roadway through natural drainage features and upland habitats only when its public benefit outweighs other concerns. (Policy 1.8.3, revised) Include in all new road and trail plans, adequate right-of-way for potential landscaping, where feasible, and provide adequate funds for maintenance in the annual budget of the City. (Policy 1.8.4, new) Maintain trees on City-controlled property according to published American National Standards Institute (ANSI) A-300 standards and Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) guidelines to preserve existing vegetation and canopy, as much as possible. (Cross Reference: See Conservation Element, Policy 1.1.5) (Policy 1.8.3, revised) Include in all new road and trail plans, adequate right-of-way for potential landscaping, where feasible, and provide adequate funds for maintenance in the annual budget of the City. ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND SUSTAINABILITY -11_ revised aoal; 2 revised objectives; 3 new policies, 6 revised policies) (Goal 1, revised) To develop a safe, convenient, efficient and coordinated system of motorized and nonmotorized transportation facilities which ensures adequate movement of people and goods through and within the City and which incorporates transportation strategies to address reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector. (Policy 1.2.8, revised) Design major roadways as complete transportation corridors to the extent appropriate, incorporating bicycle lanes, pedestrian and transit features to achieve a true multimodal system with the intent of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. As funding becomes available, retrofit existing corridors to accommodate multimodal options. (Objective 1.2, revised) Roadway Network. To provide an attractive, safe, convenient, and efficient arterial, collector and local roadway system that serves travel demands and reduces greenhouse gas emissions, through establishment of criteria to be enforced during site plan review, concurrency management and access management. (Policy 1.5.4, new) Require both new development and substantial redevelopment to provide adequate safe bicycle facilities on-site, to adjacent sites as practical, and in adjacent right-of- way. Such facilities shall include the provision of bicycle parking, as appropriate. Additionally, ,~ mitigation or elimination of existing bicycle hazards (e.g. installing bicycle detectors at signalized intersections) may be required, as needed and dependent upon the magnitude of the development or redevelopment project. In lieu of providing these systems, the developer may contribute funds quid pro quo for use by the City for funding expansion of similar systems. (Cross Reference: See Capital Improvements Element, Policy 1.4.5) (Policy 1.5.5, revised from policy 1.5.4) Promote context-sensitive parking design to encourage walking, bicycling, ridesharing, and transit use. Shared parking is encouraged where feasible. (Policy 1.5.13, revised from policy 1.5.12) Require that interconnected, unencumbered sidewalks be constructed concurrently with new development, by the developer (including sidewalks required to connect the development to schools, parks, bus stops, or other activity areas functioning as pedestrian generators). (Policy 1.5.14, revised) Implement bicycle lanes on both sides of arterial and collector streets where feasible, except in the Town Center where travel lanes are also utilized as bicycle lanes. Coordinate with METROPLAN ORLANDO, the County and the State to expand the current bicycle lane system. Implement sidewalks on both sides of all arterial and collector streets. (Policy 1.5.19, new) Establish a Trails Advisory Committee made up of residents who will work together to pursue the planning and implementation of an interconnected trail and bicycle system and make appropriate recommendations to the City Commission. (Policy 1.6.1, revised) Encourage land uses and site development that promotes public transit within designated public transit corridors, with priority given to those projects that will bring the greatest increase in transit ridership and reduction to greenhouse gas emissions, traffic congestions and air pollution. (O 'ective 1.6, revised) The City shall adopt policies to encourage the implementation and usage of public transit facilities, including LYNX and the planned Central Florida Commuter Rail (SunRail). Public transit provides many benefits, including improved mobility, safety, security, and environmental quality. Public transit also enhances economic opportunity by expanding the labor pool, improving job accessibility, and reducing traffic congestion. The environmental benefits of public transit include items such as improved air quality, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, and reduced stormwater runoff from paved surfaces. (Policy 1.6.2, revised) Require residential development with greater than 200 units or commercial developments over 50,000 square feet to incorporate a transit shelter, benches, and bicycle parking into their site plan, if located along a transit route, or if not located along a transit route, to contribute fees in lieu of these facilities to be used by the City specifically for transit related facilities. Transit ridership to and from such developments shall be encouraged and further improved by including elements, such as: • Clearly delineated, well lit walkways from the building to the transit stop; and • Commercial buildings placed closer to the street with access and windows directed to the street. (Cross Reference: See Future Land Use Element, Policy 5.2.4) (Policy 1.1 1.4, new) Require that transportation facilities needed to serve new development are in place, or under actual construction, within 3 years after the approval of a building permit, or its • functional equivalent that results in traffic generation. The only exceptions to this policy are those described in Subsection 163.3180, F.S. OTHER - j2 new policies, 6 revisedl (Policy 1.2.9, revised) Maintain LOS and projected traffic circulation system demand through the year 2030 by undertaking the projects listed in this element and future transportation studies conducted for the City as well as by encouraging the State, County, and METROPLAN ORLANDO to implement projects on the state county highway system. (Policy 1.2.13, revised) Limit individual driveway cuts to local roads or alleys. Prohibit new residential driveway cuts onto arterial or collector roadways, unless absolutely warranted. Prohibit existing lots that have access to local roads from creating new driveway cuts onto arterial and collector roads. (Policy 1.3.7, revised) When designing extensions of existing collector roads to their logical arterial connection, choose road designs that naturally slow traffic, so that improved circulation and opportunities for a reduction in vehicle miles traveled is not at the expense of peaceful habitation. (Policy 1.3.9, revised [previously was policy 1.3.10]) Require new development and redevelopment to provide adequate emergency access on-site and as necessary to adjacent properties. (Policy 1.7.4, revised) Update the traffic study portion of this Transportation Element periodically to reflect the most current population projections. (Policy 1.7.5, new) Develop standards to ensure that development in the Town Center consists of pedestrian-sized blocks. (Cross Reference: See Future Land Use Element, Policy x.xx) (Policy 1.10.1, revised) Consider adopting and~or promoting Transportation System Management (TSM) or Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies to enhance traffic capacity, movement and safety, if needed. Consider additional TSM~TDM strategies, such as staggered work hours, transit, trail, ridesharing~carpooling incentives, guaranteed ride home and other TSM~TDM measures. (Policy 1.1 1.5, new) Maintain records to determine whether any 1 10% de minimus transportation impact threshold is reached, pursuant to Subsection 163.3180(6), F.S. A summary of these records shall be submitted with the annual Capital Improvements Element update. Deleted policies that were not necessary. This includes Policy 1.2.14, Policy 1.3.8, Policy 1.5.13, Policy 1.5.17, Policy 1.8.4, Policy 1.9.6, Policy 1.10.6, City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT • 4^Ci~VpCrLVPT e7~T~~i V~Ti~l~.r ~ T~~C~i rT~i~00 Draff EAR-Based Amendments. March 2009 I Prepared For: City of Winter Springs Community Development Department 1 126 East State Road 434 Winter Springs, Florida 32708-2799 rnu ~„,,.„0 7„„ ~~ I • • Prepared B~ Plannina Communities. LLC 2510 Wild Tamarind Blvd. Orlando, FL 32828 i nn i.r,.«.~, n«i,.„a,. n.,,,„,,,, c,,;~o Inc ~I7;„•e« D„«l. Dl,...;,a„ 2774(] Y-iYilt ~c 6ii~F~ii~-~ A~~-isFc~~ 6 ~rire~-~i~rix ~~-iiiv. • CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS A. GOALS. OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES ....................................................................................1 B. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................16 C. INVENTORY ........................................................................................................................16 1. Road System .................................................................................................................17 a. Jurisdiction and Maintenance Responsibilitx .........................................................................18 b. Functional Classification ............................................................................................................18 c. Constrained Facilities .................................................................................................................19 d. Crash Locations ............................................................................................................... 193$ e. Signalized Intersections ............................................................................... 26~ f. Evacuation Routes ................................................................................................................. 26~ 2. Public Transit System ........................................................................................... 2736 3. Parkins System . 2q.~q 4. Bicycle System ......................................................................................................... 294 5. Pedestrian System. 3Q3g 6. Intermodal Facilities ................................................................................................. 3233 D. TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS ...................................................................................... 3233 1. Growth Trends ......................................................................................................... 3333 2. Roadway Current Performance ................................................................................ 3333 3. Future Roadway Performance ............................................. 363 4. Model Develoament and Validation ................................................................ 4345 a. OUATS Model Set .................................................................................. 435 b. Trig Generation ...................................................................... 43~§ c. Trip Distribution ....................................................................... ......,........................... 434§ . I d. Modal Split/Auto Occupancy ......................................... 4445 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT I e. Traffic Assianment .................................................................................................................4446 f. Trip Generation Modifications ............................................................................................4446 g. Use of OUATS 1 1 Trip Purpose Models ...........................................................................4446 5. Public Transit Performance ...................................................................................... 4446 6. Other Transportation Systems .................................................................................. 454 7. Future Transportation Planning ............................................................................... 464,E a. Future Transportation Map ..................................................................................................464$ b. Transportation Concurrency Alternatives ..........................................................................49§~ c. Future Public Transit Plan. .493 d. Pedestrian Plannina .............................................................................................................503 e. Bicycle Plannina .....................................................................................................................503 f. TSM/TDM Strateaies ............................................................................................................503~- • CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT LIST OF TABLES Table II - 1: Historic Daily Volumes and Year 2008 Roadway Link Levels of Service (LOSI....22 Table II - 2: Historic Daily Volumes and Roadway Link Levels of Service with Existina Network City Streets) ......................................................................................................................................23a-4 Table II - 3: Crash Locations with Greater than Five Crashes, 2007 .............................................26~ Table II - 4: Public Transit Characteristics ............................................................................................263 Table II - 5: Statewide Minimum Level of Service (LOS) Standards for the State Hiahway System as Determined ~ ADT (total volume) ..........................................................................................353 Table II - 6: Generalized Annual Average Daily Volumes for Florida's Urbanized Areas.......373~ Table II - 7: 2012 Projected Traffic Conditions ..................................................................................3936 Table II - 8: Programmed and Planned Highway System Improvements .......................................423 Table II - 9: Proarammed City Improvements .....................................................................................4235 LIST OF MAPS Map II- 1: Existina Roadway Classification. Jurisdiction and Number of Lanes .......................... 21 Map II- 2: Signalized Intersections and Crash Locations. 2007 ................................................... 25 Map II- 3: Public Transit System and Maior Traffic GeneratorsfAttractors ................................ 28 Map II- 4: Year 2008 Deficiencies and LOS 38 Map II- 5: Future Transportation Map (Year 2010 Transportation Plan) .................................... 47 Map II- b: Transportation Improvements ...................................................................................... 48 r -I ~~T~9 ~~18Pi ~ r ;;. 1 ~~~~~4PIT ~u,,,. ................... ~31'v ............................................................................................................................................... ,a c.,..~,.._. ..1• ~ e-~ee~e~~e~9 ...... .... .. .............................................................................. 4 e ~~~ai~ed~eterseet~e~ ..............................................................4 z~;~-~a}~S~e~ . .. ....................................................................................4 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT C~~t~~er~e~ariremt3"" ............................................................................................................................ ` ~T I~,hP~~S R9~-T#I$I~~-~P~~/4L~FS~~S .................................................................................................................6 -1~--See~e ~eene~e-Fze~-~iertQ" -~9~~~~re~~er€er~rt~e ..........................................................................................................'' t-t~re~~e~~~=~~-i?e~€er3ee ............................................................................................................ 8 ~1:-~1¢e~e~e~e~e~t~e~~ `zei~~a~~e~ .................................................................................................n b. '€~t~~ erter~~et~ ........................................................ -~~~~st-r}b~e~ ...........................................................................................................................9 €~f~--5 erters~~~~¢e~€~ea~t~e n~ .................................................... .............................................. ~ n -T~ esit~er€ere .............................................................................................................. ~ n -~J~~er-~s~er~a~e~S~s~et~ ........................................................................................................., , 7-~~~re '~'~s~s$er~e~e~ ~ie~ ..............................................................................................................?~ e~3~rre~h~e ~'~s~tTls~ .. ... .................................................................:~-3 ~ '~'~r~tzreTe~esirrt. ... ..................................................................................... ~3 e~-ke €e~~e~ei•e .................................................................................. ~ ~-~S~L4;~A¢-Seg~es ............................................................................................, z II-iv CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT • • • .. ..,. i " T ~n -z i 4 ~ n~ ~ o icz ~Tee3 - eR~~rm~ ce2C cirri~ ,.: 1."` -~ ,I •~ ,~1 ' ~ t ........................ ~ n ze Ri J 3 ~ ~ ae e~~ 3E9 .......................................... ......................................................... ~14a$-~ ~:-~~eerseetfe~ee~~e~eea~e--~ ................................... ~4s~~--~~A911 `~'~~€~~E~~is ~~~es ......................................................................................................~n ~4a~-8L~e°~ rfnnrcviv~i:9$63~#S$9~3~~&~ ..................................................................................................4c II-v CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT • CHAPTER II TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT A. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES GOAL 1: To develop a safe, convenient, efficient and coordinated system of motorized and nonmotorized transportation facilities which ensures adequate movement of people and goods through and within the City and which incorporates transportation strategies to address reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector. Objective 1.1: Level of Service. Throughout the planning period, the City shall enforce the ~~Level of -eService (LOST standard on all arterial and collector roads. (Cross Reference: See Capital Improvement Element, Policy 1.2.1.a.) Policy 1.1.1: eke-Adopt the minimum daily T --__.., ,.c c,.~_:~LOS} standard~e-lie for transportation facilities based on annual average daily trips (AADT~ as follows: • Limited Access Roads as prescribed by FDOT • Arterials D • • Collectors D Policv 1.1.2: '''~-~ ':~~- :'~~" ~`'oordinate with ~'-~~mMETROPLAN ORLANDO and LYNX to assist the County in maintaining the County's adopted LOS standard for mass transit - 1.03 revenue miles per capita per year based on the estimated functional population within the transit service area.~~. ~e~,~ , ~. ~,~ ~-, „~, rPolicv 1.1.3: Monitor the functioning system by use of the Florida Starn Structure (FSUTMS) used by forecastings'n ~ ~.Tn,, ~ ~r /L:CT r-rr Tc so that collector road according to valid priorities. of the arterial and collector road hard Urban Transportation Model FDOT for travel demand improvements may be scheduled . .Policv 1.1.4: Require a traffic study for all new development generating more than 300 daily =strips. Such study shall be conducted in accordance with written procedures provided by the City. ~~~-• ' ' ":Policv 1.1.5: valuate proposed development for transportation concurrency . sin established _ . riteria. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT . .Policy 1.1.6: ''"'-~ `-'~~- .,~-~" ~--•---~",-Annually monitor the LOS status of ar~eri~arterials. collectors, and all state roadways within the City~i~~g `~~Ts~}l~}-t~_,. z:~`' rz,.,,t~ by obtaining from the State and County their most recent traffic counts at points along all roadways that would be affected by development in the City. Policy 1.1.7: Continue to use standards and guidelines for permitting the payment of proportionate fair-share contributions to mitigate locally and regionallx significant transportation impacts consistent with Subsection 163.3180(1 f~,, F.S. Such standards and guidelines shall provide that the City shall not relX on transportation facilities in place or under actual construction more than three nears after the issuance of a building permit, except as provided in Subsection 163.3180(16), F.S. Policy 1.1.8: Coordinate with th~_ Florida Deaartment of Transportation iFDOT regarding methods by which the pedestrian orientation of the Town Center can be achieved. This coordination may include the possible reclassification of S.R. 434 through the Town Center as a Class II or Class III arterial, the potential designation of the facility west of Vistawilla Drive as one where it would be appropriate to apply a policy constraint prohibiting future widening of the roadway, and f or examining the appropriateness of lowering the speed limit along a portion of the roadway • Objective 1.2: Roadway Network. To provide an attractive, safe, convenient, and efficient arterial, collector and local roadway system that serves travel demands ----~~Q nd reduces greenhouse gas emissions. through establishment of criteria to be enforced during site plan review, concurrency management and access managements-eke a~ea~e. Policy 1.2.1: =f=i3eDesign the arterial roadway system- si3 '~~Q~ through cooperation with the FDOT and Seminole County to provide high-volume, multi-lane facilities with access controls, where appropriate, to preserve the through traffic carrying capacity of the facility. , Policy 1.2.2: _ ~ Re uire joint use access and cross access easements except where ~~ethey would be infeasible, to encourage interconnectivity between developments and to reduce congestion on arterials and collector roads. , Policy 1.2.3: f~e*~iAeEncourage the interconnection of collector roads on the street network to provide residents with alternative routes ~~--~° ~~"~~~~~ °~~a~-nd the potential for a reduction in vehicle miles traveled. Policy 1.2.4: ~kkeFund the collector road system s~~-~e~ -may T;i ~transaortation impact .fees. • II-2 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Policy 1.2.5: =~eDevelop the collector road system °'-°" `-~ a~--~'~j3ec~-according to the uture Transportation Map (Map II-H5~ and design standards derived under the auspices of the City, to coordinate the construction of segments of the system by both the public and the private sectors. Policy 1.2.6: ontinue to address; through the Future Transportation Map and periodic review, these factors: • Current and projected deficiencies of arterial roads under other jurisdictions; and I • Existing deficiencies of City collector streets. Policy 1.2.7: tilize appropriate access management alternative techniques to control arterial road access,, reduce conaestion, and preserve '~~•-~~' .~r ~~~~~-~.LOS. These techniques include but are not limited to the following: • Limit access to roads by controlling the number and location of site access driveways; , • Cross-_access ,-',...,,..,~: ~~~ ~asements to adjacent properties where feasible; and • -Use of frontage or back-lot parallel access roads where feasible. Policy 1.2.8: -~Desian major roadways sue- s complete transportation corridors to the extent appropriate, incorporating bicycle lanes, pedestrian and transit features to achieve a true ultimodal system with the intent of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. As funding becomes available. retrofit existing corridors to accommodate multimodal options. Policy 1.2.9: ~re}ee~edMaintain LOS and projected traffic circulation system demand i , ~a ~~.,, r nc ..~,....~,....~.. ~;~,..~ ,.~.~__,. .:n ~... a through the year ~~2030 by undertaking the projects listed in this element die and future transportation studies conducted for the City, as well as bx encouraging the State. County, and METROPLAN ORLANDO to implement projects on the state county highway system. Policy 1.2.10: ~'''~-- ~;~~- --~" ~~ooperate and extensively coordinate with the State, the County and the METROPLAN ORLANDO to ensure that their improvements are implemented by the dates indicated, and as the need I develops. ~ec~Monitor proposed developments within the Citye ~~~ to determine if roadway infrastructure will be adequate to service projected demand, and development approvals will be dependent upon these criteria. I Policy 1.2.11: Create intersections of the new City collector roads with arterials where they will coordinate with the functioning of arterials. II-3 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT I Policy 1.2.12: Design and engineer the collector road system to minimize traffic impact on arterial roads. Policy 1.2.13: . 3~-e5j-Limit individual driveway cuts to local roads or alleys. Prohibit new residential driveway cuts onto arterial or collector roadways unless absolutely warranted. Prohibit existina lots that have access to local roads from creating new driveway cuts onto arterial and collector roads. Policy 1.2.14: . oordinate with FDOT to appropriately re-classify S.R. 434 within the Winter Springs Town Center Corridor as a Class II or Class III arterial based on the increased density of traffic signals along S R 434 (Cross Reference• See Transportation Element, Policy 1.1.81 Policy 1.2.15: Support the widenina of S.R. 434 to 4-lanes from S R 417 to S R 426 in the City of Oviedo. (Cross Reference: See Intergovernmental Coordination Element Policy 1.3.11 I Objective 1.3: Roadway Connectivity. The City shall, through configuration of the ~eCity-wide collector road system, create the interaction and cohesiveness that have been lacking among the residential neighborhoods of Winter Springs, but do so in a manner that I oes not diminish the quality of life within each ee~neighborhood. Policy 1.3.1: tilize design cross-sections for collector and local roads-t~i~t3e that accommodate narrower rights-of-way and roadway widths within developments that meet the definition of traditional neighborhood development. , Policy 1.3.2: ~ Require that roadways be dedicated to the public when there is a compelling public interest for the roadways to connect with existing public roadways. Policy 1.3.3: ~ equire new development nd substantial redevelopment to connect to existing adjacent roadwayszl3a~e "~~-- e~rt:" °~ `'-~~~'~~--~-'~°~~~~ bicycle facilities, and sidewalks or otherwise "stub- out" to future development sites except when such connections would be patently inappropriate. I Policy 1.3.4: "1=k ~ ~ : ~~'~'~;'~Utilize access management standards~tt~ Eec~e to ensure appropriate access to the City's transportation system. Standards may include the requirement of joint-use driveways and/or cross access easements to access sites. II-4 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT I Policy 1.3.5: "' ;~ , Preserve the movement function of the major thoroughfare system by requiring development of parallel roads or cross access easements to connect developments as they are permitted along major roads. I Policy 1.3.6: ~ Review through the development review process atl proposed development for consistency with future transportation projects listed in this element, and for the implementation of the ': tanned bic cle and trail system. Policy 1.3.7: When designing extensions of existing collector roads to their logical arterial connection : , u choose oad designs that naturally slow traffic, so that improved circulation and opportunities for a reduction in vehicle miles traveled is not at the expense of peaceful habitation._ , x-10_-• ' ' °- ~''~~~~°~~Prohibit the creation of landlocked parcels Nonresidential parcels shall be required to have riaht-of-way frontaae or an adequate access easement (such as in out-parcels in shopping centers). Policy 1.3.8: Policy 1.3.9: Reauire new development and redevelopment to provide adequate emeraency access on-site and as necessary to adjacent properties. Objective 1.4: Rights-of--way. The City shall coordinate with the County and the State to protect existing rights-of-way, and to prioritize and acquire future r~keriahts-of-way in accordance with the uture Transportation Map. Policy 1.4.1: Update the Future Transportation f~r~Map when appropriate to ensure the protection of future rights-of-way. Policy 1.4.2: ~~e-~-s~a~Do not vacate rights-of-way that are ~eee~;~r-~-needed to maintain an efficient and adequate transportation system. Policy 1.4.3: .~ '. ~ Require the provision of adequate setbacks and dedications necessary to implement the Future Transportation ~Rt3Map. II-5 • CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Policy 1.4.4: ' ' ;' ontinue requiring the dedication of needed rights- of-way from new development, where applicabl . Policy 1.4.5: ',-i.,, ~,~~-- ~'~~" ~~ •-•~~' ~'~~Amend setback requirements, zoning restrictions and right-of-way protection requirements, if necessary, to make the City's land development regulations consistent with ~'~~: -~'~-•--~-~~--II elements of the Comprehensive Plan. Policy 1.4.6: "`''~-- ':~~- :'-~" -~• , - ---Require adequate ~riaht-of-way protection for intersections, interchanges and future park-and-ride sites in order to retain flexibility for future growth and expansion. Policy 1.4.7: ':':~c ''~~- ~'-~" ~~, -~ ~'~~~ ~'~~~Require development c~€in the Town Center ~~to provide the necessary right-of-way dedications for the proposed 'i"______ ~-.._~~.. n..-_,.-__..-.public street network. Policy 1.4.8: ~ ~ Maintain minimum ~r~iaht-of-way requirements ~ for new roadways. Policy 1.4.9: '~"i,e ' ~~ , ~-~-Pursue grant opportunities for median landscaping and road beautification. Policy 1.4.10: ;' ~ ~ Require the dedication of all needed rights-of-way and necessary roadway improvements for all new development, and adopt provisions to protect I dedication of roads to the City. , Policy 1.4.11: "" Acquire rights-of-w~ for future transportation needs as funds become available. , Policy 1.4.12: " esignate U.S. Highway 1792 as a mass transit corridor. Objective 1.5: ultimodal System. The City shall promote alternative modes of transportation to provide a safe and efficient ~-~-~~~ultimodal system. Policy 1.5.1: &~9~39~v~cia~--~3P9 Fkf3~ et-ite~a ee~s~stet3~ --~~'- n €erS ort safe and convenient on-site motorized and non-motorized traffic flow, adequate pedestrian ~~facilities and connections, and ~'(''"`-~"~", ~~ ---~~" ~: -ufficient e~-site-parking for both motorized and non- motorized vehicles. • Policy 1.5.2: evelop standards ~•- ~'~-- ':~~~- ~:~~-'~~ for access to public transit, ~ .. Such standards shall apply to new ~+~sdevelopment. substantial improvements of existing II-6 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT c~e)e~t~et~sdevelopment, and to road improvements. , Rslie~rl-3.3: '~'~e~~t~-s~a$--e~sere-~ ~c ~.:.,_...,.. ~a r~u~~t Policy 1.5.3• ' Require both new development and substantial redevelopment to provide adequate safe pedestrian facilities on-site. to adjacent sites as practical. and in adjacent right-of-way Such facilities shall include lighted sidewalks along both sides of all internal roadways and as appropriate on the development side of adjacent roadways Additionally mitigation or elimination of existing pedestrian hazards (e g upgrading an intersection) may be required as needed and dependent upon the magnitude of the development or redevelopment project In lieu of providing these systems the developer may contribute funds quid pro quo for use by the ity for funding expansion of similar systems. (Cross ReferencP~ Sea (-a it(~nrove•*+~~*~ Element. Policy 1.4.5) Policy 1.5.4: Reauire both new development and substantial redevelopment to provide adeauate safe bicycle facilities on-site. to adjacent sites as practical and in adiacent right-of-way. Such facilities shall include the provision of bicycle parkins, ss appropriate. Additionally mitigation or elimination of existins bicycle hazards (e.s. installing bicycle detectors at signalized intersections) may be reauired, as needed and dependent upon the magnitude of the development or redevelopment project In lieu of providing these systems, the developer may contribute funds quid pro quo for use by the City for funding expansion of similar systems (Cross Reference See Ca ital Improvements Element. Policy 1.4.5 ~el+e~r-~:~4:Policy 1.5.5: Promote context-sensitive,~arking design to encourage walking, bicycling, ridesharing, and transit use~n--s~i~~. Shared parking is encouraged where feasible. Policy 1.5.6• Tl~-r:... ..t,„ii _ ~~.,. r-:~ r- a ..aa.. c ~. ~ Re uire^ new develo ment and II-7 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT edevelopment to provide adequate on-site handicap accessible facilities bicycle and pedestrian facilities. and ~~te-~~~~e~~e~~~~ ~, as appropriate, transit facilities to promote safe and efficient intermodal ovement options. . olicy 1.5.7• rt°.. '': y ;L°„ z~-- _-- .,-.. ~':--_ ~'~ ' °aa..~.... _r~ Reauire new development and redevelopment to provide safe well lit, and ee~efficient on-sit° ~-°rr... n~___~ ___~.:..,- :__,__a_; motorized and non- motorized raffic movements arkin and as applicable. connections to adjacent sites and riahts-of-wax. • ~ Encouraae increased land use densities and mixed uses, consistent with the Future Land Use Element to enhance the feasibility of transit and promote alternative transportation modes. Policy 1.5.8: Require that new development be compatible with and further the achievement of the Transportation Element. Requirements for compatibility may include but are not limited to P~ e ~r~r}r 7 ti 1'l t'9t1t~R t}ire-}~i~i~r}ir~rr frcassi L- 1- 1 ~] .Policy 1.5.9: providing clearly delineated routes through parking lots to safely accommodate pedestrian and bicycle circulation. . .Policy 1.5.10: _ nclude landscaping and streetscaping (includina liahtina) as roadway design components, where appropriate. in order to enhance the function of the road for all users. ~t~rp~e~e~EeeL~~~--t~~~Prepare. adopt and implement a pedestrian circulation plan. Priority will be given to those walkways for which heavy recreational usage is projected, as well as those along roadways between residential areas and schools, which can be implemented concurrently with other roadway improvements. ;~`:u. ~~,.;~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~. -,.,~,-~,~ Policy 1.5.1 1 II-8 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT e~:~~t~rer~et}-,c~€ Require an ~eeffective and safe pedestrian circulation system.- Policy 1.5.12: ~ as a part of any new public or private roadway design and construction. Such a system shall e given major consideration in any substantial road improvement project n_~:_.. , , s., ~;policy 1.5.13: Require that interconnected, unencumbered sidewalks be constructed concurrently with new development, by the developer- ~~ ~includina sidewalks c~e~e~required to connect the development to schools,~parks, bus stops or other activity areas e~ers~:functionina as pedestrian aeneratorsl. R~lir --.1 'S 13~ '~ E ~ b ~ d i ~d ~ ~ ~ e e~ e~~~ e te~e~e~ 3~t~e*a~~~ ~~ Policy 1.5.14: f~.eeep~-~ ~~e '~'e~t~~e~~er~=here bi}ee9 ar~~ee~se t~ci-;~,~~ mplement bicycle lanes on both sides of arterial and collector --~ _ .:~~...:a,,.__,.n... ..~..,~,:..~.,.a ~~... treets. where feasible, except in the Town Center where travel lanes are also utilized as bicycle lanes. Coordinate with METROPLAN ORLANDO, the County and the State to expand the current bicycle lane system. {~-~~- 4~-FU--~4-H5} Implement sidewalks on both sides of all arterial and collector streets. Policy 1.5.15: ,Make intersections edestrian-friendly whenever possible, by limiting the crossing width to 45--€eetthe shortest possible distance aiven the characteristics of the roadwa,x; use of adequate lighting; adequate timing for traffic signals; and the provision of facilities for the handicapped. 'rt_.. ~,:~.. ,t_..ii ~,.....a:._,.... Coordinate with FDOT and the County to implement this policy. Policy 1.5.16: Continue to work with other jurisdictions to convert the former railroad riaht-of-way into a corridor for alternative modes of travel within the City -walking trails, bicycle paths, equestrian and recreation. Ra I i e -1- 5~~r- ~ :, Policy 1.5.17: ~ Adopt a reenwa Interchan e District (GID) master circulation plan prior to the °~~nssuance of any development approval in the C~~s-~- ortion of the GID west of S.R. 417. II-9 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT • Policy 1.5.18: Encourage the implementation of the S.R. 434 Crosstown bus route and linkage to the planned Central Florida Commuter Rail (SunRail~ Policy 1.5.19: Establish a Trails Advisory Committee made up of residents who will work Nether to pursue the planning and implementation of an interconnected trail and bicycle system and make appropriate recommendations to the City Commission. Policy 1.5.20: Consider the feasibility of a route along S.R. 434 connecting the Town Center and the Greenway Interchange District, with the proposed facility to be limited to transit, bicycle, and f or pedestrian access. Environmental feasibility and traffic circulation would be the primary effort of the initial consideration. If permitting issues are not found to be insurmountable, a study may be performed to address issues such as potential routes and potential funding sources for capital and operating costs, and additional factors for a transit component such as operating agency, headways, hours of operation, projected ridership, and pricinc,~ Objective 1.6: Public Transit. The City shall ---------- r---- ---------- ------_---, __.. __ ~__ ...~..~__ -~se~adopt policies to encou rage the implementa tion and usage of public transit facilities. including LYNX and the planned Central Florida Comm uter Rail (Su nRail) Public transit provides many benefits, including improved mobility, safety, s ecurity, and environmental quality Public transit also enhances economic opportunity by ex panding the labor pool improving job accessibility, and reducing traffic congestion. The environmental b enefits of public transit include items such as improved air aualit y, reduced greenhou se gas emiss ions, and reduced stormwater runoff from paved surfaces. Policy 1.6.1: T"~ ~''•-• ~"~" ~~~~••°~~~ encourage land uses and site developments that promotes public transit within designated public transportation corridors, with priority given to those projects that will bring the greatest increase in transit ridership and reduction to greenhouse gas emissions, traffic congestion and air pollution. Policy 1.6.2: ~+~Require residential development with greater than 200 units or commercial developments over 50,000 square feet ~ri}to incorporate :~xeea transit shelter, benches, and bicycle parking into their site clan if located along a transit route, or if not located along a transit route to contribute fees in lieu of these facilities to be used by the City specifically for c~~-transit related facilities. Transit ridership to and from such developments shall be encouraged and further improved by including elements, such as: • ~~tses; II-10 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT • • Clearly delineated, well lit walkways from the building to the transit stop; and Commercial u+~-€~+ly-buildings placed closer to the street: with access and windows directed to the street. (Cross Reference: See Future Land Use Element, Policy 5.2.41 Policy 1.6.3: 'T',.. ':~`,• ~'~~" --~~--°~`nsure that all roads serviced by public transit routes function at a'~--~' ~`~~°-~~~LOS sufficient to support the bus service. Policy 1.6.4: tifv LYNX of any proposed traffic generators/attractors submitted to the City for review. Policy 1.6.5: c~rl~Work with LYNX to improve existing bus stops, and to design new ones to include benches, bicycle parking, signage, lights, and protection from the elements. Bus stops shall also be eee~e~raccessible for the handicapped and elderly passengers. Policy 1.6.6: "~''~~ ',=`-_ ~'-°" -~~°a~--°~~''oordinate with LYNX to accommodate riders with eke--special needs Policy 1.6.7: Inventory sidewalks within one-auarter to one-half mile of the new LYNX Crosstown bus route to identify missing links in the pedestrian system. Implement new sidewalks where sidewalks do not exist or where sidewalks are in disrepair and are hazardous, as funding becomes available to provide access to transit and promote ridership Objective 1.7: Land Use Coordnation. Throughout the planning period, the City shall coordinate the transportation system needs with land use designations, and ensure that existing and proposed population densities, housing and employment patterns, and land uses are consistent with the transportation modes and services proposed for these areas. Policy 1.7.1: z i3e '~~~-• : ~-~" ~~-~~'-'~~'~~stablish standards that promote the location of affordable housing in ewe-proximity to employment opportunities and transit services. Policy 1.7.2: _ ontinue to adopt and enforce regulations and standards that require that the design and function of the roadway be adequate for the type, size, and location of the land uses they serve. Policy 1.7.3: ~at~Encourage land uses that generate high traffic counts ~'~~'~~ exeeerage~-to locate adjacent to arterial roads and mass transit corridors. Policy 1.7.4: Uadate the traffic study portion of this Transportation Element periodically to reflect the most current population projections CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ~ _. .03rd- Policy 1.7.5: Develop standards to ensure that development in the Town Center consists of pedestrian-sized blocks. (Cross Reference: See Future Land Use Element, Policy 2.2.11 Objective 1.8: Environment. The City should conserve the natural environment and augment open space ~~~~,',as functions of road development. Policy 1.8.1: hoose rights-of-way for the City's collector road system-, where valid options are available, distant enough from natural drainage features and upland habitats to ec~allow coexistence with these natural areas. Policy 1.8.2: ~e-Allow the incursion of a roadway through ~kese-natural ~°~~~ :'~~" '-~ „ii~._.,,a :r :.>,,...,.c:.` .~.~ -Drainage features and upland habitats only when its public , benefit outwei hs other concerns. Policy 1.8.3: Include in all new road and trail plans adequate right-of-way for potential landscaping, where feasible, and provide adequate funds for maintenance ; in the annual budget of the City. Policy 1.8.4: Maintain trees on City-controlled property according to published American National Standards Institute (ANSI) A-300 standards and Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) i!u~`~~~~:= guidelines to preserve xisting vegetation and canopy, as much as possible. - r R f r n Conservation Element. Policy 1.1.5) Objective 1.9: Intergovernmental Coordination. Traffic circulation planning will be coordinated with METROPLAN ORLANDO~~-"~~, FDOT, Seminole County, rJr~c neighboring jurisdictions and other transportation related agencies. Policy 1.9.1: Monitor the schedules for improvements and ongoing policies of all jurisdictions whose transportation responsibilities within the City limits affect the quality of life and the '~--~~': '-t : ~~--~~~~LOS on which Winter Springs' citizens depend. Policy 1.9.2: rev-ie~Review subsequent versions of the FDOT Five-Year Transportation Plan, in order to update or modify this element, as necessary. I Policy 1.9.3: ~ , ~ eep abreast and review updates to the Transportation Element of the Seminole County Comprehensive Plan, in order to update or modify this element, as necessary. II-12 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT • Policy 1.9.4: ' ' :~ , Promote a comprehensive transportation planning process that coordinates state, regional, and local transportation plans. Policy 1.9.5: Support the State and the County on the establishment of alternative transportation systems, including high speed-x~k~ commuters and/or light rail line systems connecting Seminole County with other areas in Florida. Policy 1.9.6: Work with FDOT and Seminole County to make low speed urban street • • design the normal, default practice for street construction, reconstruction, or modification within the Town Center. These urban street design features shall include, but not be limited to, wide, unencumbered sidewalks, narrow motor-vehicle lanes, street trees, prominent crosswalks. tight turning radii, and very limited use of turn lanes. The City shall encourage the same polic~be adopted and implemented by these entities for their roadway segments within the Town Center. Policy 1.9.7: ''''~-~ r~:~.. ,~.,.,i ... _.~.~:..,.~,. Coordinate development of all property in the City adjacent to Tuskawilla Road with County requirements for laneage and intersection improvements to lessen development impact until the road is improved. Policy 1.9.8: Coordinate with the Florida Department of Transportation regarding a reduction in the speed limit on S.R. 434 in the Town Center, when warranted, to better reflect the pedestrian-friendly environment being created in the Town Center. (Cross Reference: See Transportation Element, Policy 1.1.81 Policy 1.9.9: Discourage the widening of S.R. 434 west of Vistawilla Drive. (Cross Reference: See Transportation Element. Policy 1.1.8) Objective 1.10: Transportation#1~'e Management Systems. The City shall evaluate the need and feasibility of implementing transportation€~ management systems. .. T~a~n-{A4~P~ olicy 1.10.1: '~ ~~'.~~' ~~-.~ ';~~ ;'~~" . ~~'~°'-onsider adopting and/or promoting Transportation System Management (TSM) or Transportation II-13 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Demand Management (TDM) strategies to enhance traffic capacity, movement and safety, if needed. Consider additional TSM f TDM strategies, such as staggered work hours, transit, trail. ridesharing/carpooling incentives, guaranteed ride home and other TSM f TDM measures. Objective 1.11: Concurrency Management System. The City shall maintain a Concurrency Management System to ensure that transportation facilities and services needed to support development and redevelopment are available concurrent with the impacts of such development. Policy 1.11.1: 'i=~i-~ ~:~~,• :'~~" ~-~~~~•-•-•~''ontinue requiring that adequate transportation facilities to maintain the City's '-~---~' ~~~ ~~•~~-~~~~LOS standards be available to meet the traffic demands of all new development prior to the issuance of a final development order, in accordance with the Concurrency Management Provisions set forth in the Capital Improvements Element of this Plan. Policy 1.11.2: Require that all new developments anticipated to generate 300 or more daily trips be required to submit a Transportation Impact Study._ (~ ~ _ _ _ Cross Reference: See Transportation Element, Policy 1.1.4) Policy 1.11.3: Reauire new development. regardless of size, Ito provide operational improvements to the City' transportation system to mitigate their impacts on the system, to ensure smooth traffic flow, and to aid in the elimination of hazards. Improvements may include, but are not limited to: providing added connectivity, the addition of turn lanes, deceleration lanes, signage, signals and pavement markings, and contributions to the City~s •r-~~~~ultimodal system. _ _ Policy 1.1 1.4: Require that transportation facilities needed to serve new development are in place, or under actual construction, within 3 years after the approval of a building permit, or its functional equivalent that results in traffic generation. The only exceptions to this policy are those described in Subsection 163.3180, F.S. Policy 1.11.5: Maintain records to determine whether any 1 10% de minimus transportation impact threshold is reached pursuant to Subsection 163.3180(61. F.S.: A summary of these records shall be submitted with the annual Capital Improvements Element update. Policy 1.11.6: Consider conducting p study to determine the feasibility of implementing d Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA1, Multimodal Transportation District (MMTD), or similar concurrency management alternative(s) for the Town Center, Greenway Interchange District. and the developable land between the two areas. to encourage urban infill II-14 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT development. Such a study, following coordination with FDOT reaardinq the methodology, may include: • Establishing whether concurrency management alternatives are appropriate to help achieve the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan; • Investigating the implementation of similar systems in jurisdictions with similar characteristics and issues: • Establishing guidelines for granting exceptions to transportation concurrency for urban infill development, urban redevelopment, downtown revitalization, or similar purpose allowed by Florida Statutes; • Evaluating possible mobility strategies that promote the purposes for which do exception may be proposed; and • Determining specific steps that would need to be undertaken by the City • • II-15 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT B. INTRODUCTION The City ~~r `~~~i-~ is located within an urbanized portion of a Metropolitan Planning Organization {~4~(~j--- r~m~-~METROPLAN ORLANDO Therefore, the City is required by the State to adopt a Transportation Element, as opposed to a Traffic Circulation Element, and to coordinate the element with the long-range transportation plan of ~kr METROPLAN ORLANDO. The purpose of the Transportation Element is to plan for a m--'~~~ultimodal transportation system that emphasizes accessibility by placing emphasis on public transportation systems; encourages the development of compact, pedestrian-oriented urban areas; promotes energy efficient development patterns; and protects air quality. An essential base for planning a transportation system is the Future Land Use Element. The Future Land Use Map will determine where new or improved transportation facilities may be needed. The Transportation Element will assess the condition and capacity of the existing transportation facilities, project future needs, set Levels of Service (LOS) standards for roads and determine future system improvements. Roadway'~~--~~' '-r ~ ~~~-~~~LOS standards will be established to ensure that adequate facility capacity for future development is concurrently sufficient with the issuance of development orders and c~~~~~~-permits. These standards will be established for each roadway link consistent with the facility type, and current Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) LOS guidelines. The transportation planning process in Seminole County is a joint effort among various federal, I state, regional, county and municipal agencies working together with METROPLAN ORLANDOt-ke This agency ensures that highways, public transit, bicycle, pedestrian, and other transportation facilities are coordinated and planned consistent with planned development in the urbanized area. n September 2004. METROPLAN ORLANDO adopted the n. 2025 Lona Range Transportation Plan ~efor the Orlando Urban Area. a 20-year w-~~a~,~~ultimodal plan for guiding transportation improvements in the Orlando urban area (Orange, Osceola,, and Seminole counties). The plan is based on regional needs identified through the process of forecasting future travel demand, evaluating system alternatives, and selecting those options which best meet the mobility needs of the region. The plan recommends road, highway, beltway, rail, and transit I system improvements to be implemented by ?-2025. The plan represents the best combination of financial resources and improvements to meet the goals and objectives of the study. C. INVENTORY An efficient transportation system should provide access to various land uses through alternative transportation modes. The overview of the existing e~,~multimodal transportation system within the City-~~ ~ provides the basis for analyzing existing transportation deficiencies and needs within the City. This section will identify existing roadway and transit facilities, availability of public parking facilities, airport and rail line systems, availability of bicycle and pedestrian facilities and other ancillary services and programs. II-16 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 1. Road System . . Historically. the Citv has been an automobile detiendent. suburban community served b one major north-south County road. Tuskawilla Road, and one major east-west route, S.R. 434, which is primarily a 4-lane arterial highway. Other major roads in the City and vicinitX are S.R. 417 (Seminole Ex~resswaX), S.R. 419, U.S. 17-92, Red Bug Lake Road, and East Lake Drive. The City's roadway network is dis~]ayed on Mai II-1. • = f~R:-4~}:S.R. 417 (Seminole Expresswa,Y): ~e A north-south ~~ri~-r~~eria#our-lane divided expressway located along the eastern boundary of the City, which provides access to Sanford to the north and Orange County to the south. , • U.S. 17-92: A n~lorth-south principal arterial located along the west boundary of the City. It connects with Sanford to the north and Orange County to the south. The route passes through Orlando, Winter Park, Maitland, Casselberry, Longwood, Winter Springs, Lake Mary and Sanford. It is currently asix-lane undivided I facility l~rwhere adjacent to the City ,and four lanes north of Shepard Road. • S.R. 434: A principal arterial that runs from south of Altamonte Springs north to Longwood, then east through the center of Winter Springs to Oviedo, -then south past the University of Central Florida to ~....4 ~-~,~~:.., ,~..:__~S.R. 50 east of Orlando. S.R. 434 within the City ~` `~~~ cgs is primaril~a four-lane facility-, with a portion of the road east of S.R. 417 consisting- of a two-lane segment. S.R. 434 passes through the Town Center, the. City's concentrated mixed-use downtown urban center. Because the Town Center is apedestrian-oriented environment, the posted speed of 45 miles per hour on S.R. 434 poses safety and other issues for pedestrian crossings. • S.R. 419: A minor arterial that runs from S.R. 434 in Winter Springs to U.S. 17-92 near Lake Mary. Within the City ,, it is a two-lane undivided facility. • Tuskawilla Road: A four-lane County minor arterial that runs from S.R. 434 in Winter Springs to S.R. 426 near the Orange County line. • Red Bua Lake Road: A four-lane County principal arterial that runs from S.R. 436 I n_Casselberry east to S.R. 426 in Oviedo where it turns into Mitchell Hammock Road. II-17 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT • East Lake Drive: A realignment and widenina of this facility was completed in 2008. It presentlX functions as a four-lane County minor arterial that runs from Tuskawilla Road west to Seminola Boulevard which provides easy access to U.S. 17-92. The recent improvements to the facility arovide a convenient alternative for many trips that would otherwise utilize S.R. 434. a. Jurisdiction and Maintenance Responsibility Map II-1 shows the jurisdictional responsibility of each roadway in the City -~"~ vr-~.i ~• -r~.,.°~ ,.°~ r..--°The Citv's road svstem includes one limited access facility (S.R. 417), three state arterials~z~4~7; ~LJ.S. 17-92, S.R. 434 and S.R. 419;), and er~etwo County ar~eri~rlarterials, Tuskawilla. Road. and East Lake Drive a-i~. "I"here is also one County collector (,a portion of Shepard Road), ~~•' ~-•~--~,• •~~~~ {nineteen ,19) City collectors, and three local roads included in the classification. b. Functional Classification Table II-1. Table II-2 and Map II-1 show the functional classification of major roads in the City-o~l~~t The functional classification of public roads in this element is based on FDOT criteria, which ~er:~consider quantitative and qualitative factors such as jurisdiction, land access, route length, and trip lengths. A road hierarchy is used to identify I relative importance of roads within the system, provide guidance for'--~' ~` ~~~--~~~LOS and design standards, aid in establishing improvement priorities, identify maintenance responsibility, and assist in determining funding and financing policies. The hierarchy used in this element includes: II-18 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT (1) Limited Access Facilities: Designed to provide regional mobility via uninterrupted flow at high travel speeds for regional trips. Access spacing is generally on the order of one mile or more, and average travel speeds are above 40 miles per hour. There is no direct land access, and urban freeways are multi-lane, divided facilities. Lane access is always via ramps to major arterials or frontage roads. S.R. 417, ~ Seminole Expresswavl is part of the Florida Intrastate Highway System (FIHSj;-is and the only limited access facility within the City~~ (2) Arterials: Provide regional mobility via both uninterrupted flow and interrupted flow segments. Arterials provide mobility around and through urban and community cores, and accommodate relatively long trip lengths as opposed to providing access to adjacent properties. Arterials are sometimes further classified for performance as Class I, II, and III based on the number of signals per mile, access controls, geometric cross sections, and speed limits. (3) Collectors: Provide for movement between local streets and the arterial network. Collectors serve residential, commercial and industrial areas. (4) Local Roads: Provide direct access to abutting properties. Local roads accommodate traffic originating in or traveling to properties within a neighborhood, commercial or industrial development. Local roads are not considered part of the major thoroughfare system. c. Constrained Facilities x}.Subsection 339.155, L~'~°~~'~ ``~`--`~~~I~.S., makes governmental police powers available to preserve and protect property necessary for transportation corridors and recommends I that needed ~riglits-of-way be acquired as far in advance of construction as possible. FDOT requests that local governments identify constrained roadways in their comprehensive plans to ensure maintenance of the operating conditions, so that significant I degradation in the '•~--~' ..r : ~•---~--•~LOS does not occur. A constrained roadway is one in which adding two or more through lanes to meet current or future needs is not possible due to physical, environmental or policy barriers. With the development of the Town Center and its pedestrian orientation. the conflicts and potential conflicts between vehicles and pedestrians continue to increase. To assist in maintaining the pedestrian orientation of the Town Center, the City of Winter Springs will coordinate with the Florida Department of Transportation to see if a variance to Rule 14-94, F.~1.C. can be obtained. d. ' ~~~~Crash Locations ~~.rash analysis is critical because it provides a tool for City and state officials to recommend appropriate safety measures. Crash frequency II-19 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT • along with roadway performance can be used to prioritize future roadway needs. Table II-3 shows gash data for ?042007, compiled by Seminole County Traffic Enaineering from reports provided by the Winter Springs Police Department. It shows those road segments with 5 °~~~.n:rashes or more during that year, and Map II-2 visually depicts those areas. The road segment with the largest number of °---sncidents was S.R. 434 at Tuskawilla Road with ~4 °~--~29 crashes. II-20 • N Z OC d W t- Z V Z w J W Z ~_ H Q H DC Z Q OC H Z Q J d W 1 N Z w w a V a N d H QO°o UU Omti mmLL u_0 0000 U V mmmm U O N O °' n Q m rn N rn ao v M v rn sf ao v~ o v w m ao v cn v ~n v~ :° ~, ~°o aum a,~or~-cflr os c+ornn.rn mo~r~u~u-,u~ q ~ m UN OO OOr OO r r 0 OOOO 000000 O .L.. .~ C d0 ~ d W a } fi r rn rn ap W a0 O v O n M y CO N O C t9 JJQ rnrn rnhMVnMZ O_v ZZZZ ~AapZQNaD N v... Q (D [O V' M N O rn O n n ~ r O Q N M M N N M N r r`J f`J ~ ~~ d V G_ ~ O ~ W ~ c Orn rOMaDr NW N stv J0o °~~n(D t;vQ°D100Q N~ Qaaa mv`~iQQocrnv °' 7 a -~O rrn ~(yvrn CVO rnco ZZZZ OZZMO OOr" ~nM NNNNCJ MM NN ~U > > d _~ C W N ~ T J J_ ~ °D N M ~ N VN1 M V O o0 rn v v 0 tD M n N N_ aM0 aN0 N O ~ O R CD M n rn r n V'1 O rn V a0 M N 1n N r ~C) ~ O Q J O n M N n (D (O N rn n to CJ M O ~' v CD O rn rn ~ C Q1 O O N 'R M M N M CJ N ~- .-- .- r r r r M M N CJ r r ~ ~ ,O > N T ~ W Z N p}~ 0 0 O o 0 0 0 o a o o pp a o 0 0 0 0 0 oo H J O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O !/2 ~ urn nnnnnv vc cnmcacn nnnnnn o ~ O Q ~A M M~ M M M~ 0 0 ~~~~ M M M M M M O V c U r r r .- ,- .- r ~ N ~~ ~' ~ cc c _m a~ J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J O ~ 0 a Q a a Q a _Q Q a a Q a Q Q Q a a a Q Q Q U ~ N v QJ mod' d'd'd'd'~d' d'd' d'4'd'R' a'2'2'R'{YIY W ~ N cap pU ww wwwwww ww wwww wwwwww J m~~a ~ I- F- V- F- F F H H H F'- F- F- F H H F H H 1-- 1- J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O as aaaaaa as aaaa aaaaaa ~ pN~~ 'c a~ Ow NDc O Z CO C V Q sr Q R N N N ~ '7 ? a V~ 7 ct ~7 sf N ~ !J~ O= a zg "_ c m ,~ .n 3 ,~, O d ~ c ~ > ~ c ~ J W ~ m ~ ~ ~ O O W W Z !A 0 (,~ > u L~ ~ Z a W ~ a ¢ a 0 ~ m ~ ~ a> ~ O > JQ m O ~~~J m0~~0 °a' °~' S t~ ?y ~O ~ c N yw- M~ w~~ Z r O W M O J~ d J W O W~~ rn m L 3 ~[ ~^' T ~~ W ~~d~ W ~~ aH~~ Q-'}Z~~ ~ t O d= c cncn mcn~-rnv,0 wcn arn~r- wwo~F-rn rn ~ > J ~'o U 0 N 0 ~; ~ ~ _ _ CcC J C C Y C C C v lC N ~ .- W ~ 0 ~ tq 0 a ~ ~ ~ a ~ pp () > ~ is O ~ ~ Q Z > J a Y 0 z m v o W; m rd LL m w J ~j z Q O o ~> w~ d Q0 ~ a ~~ m r$ g NQ ~a NO -'~Z4~Q C~mdO~gy mU ~'c v 3a Z O ~ W rn a Z r ~~ Z 0 J W m W J Z w F ~ > N •W y O ~ry~v N ~M r J ]Ctn d' ~r U' ~Y W Q Ji^OF- M fn N ?.D O w~ mw~~a~ rn0 w~d~-r wQarz~ ~ ~!~ i°'~r~~+ u~~n ~mcn~-cncn ~w v~arn~ ~wwo~~- rn ~N ~~~y? ~ ,r ... ,.. ..-.. LL ~ _ ~ N ~ O a zzzz ~~~~~~ n.c a~rna ~'io o ~~~~ ggggg5 ~ ~o ~~~~~~ a N~ N N J J J J J J 0 U O~ O 7 ~ ° _ d' rnrn vvvaaa rnrn W W W W S-, ~S ~''S 7i7 ~ yv daN N r,~ MMMMMM YYYY ~~~~~~ d ~ ~~' a> ~~`+ ~~ ~ra~~~ ~~ gggg » » » i ~~ QTR."~ 0 0 U1 (n lA (Q fA (n to fA W W W W F- V- t- F- F- 4- fA « ~ 2 Z 2 W U O n r • z <W W J W Z H O d Z a CG H i• N Z Z ~ J °- a N ~ w w ~ _' N ~Z w ~w oa ~o ~~ aol U z UU UUUV vv °°°U U° U U U v v U v 0 O U N a 6f lD N Q O ti CJ f,p CD M O O d t~ t>7 O N ~ (O N CU ' h- ~ CJ Z M N N N M N `7 r I+ LL7 f~- lA O µ7 N O N M r r ) U ~ O O C] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O W } ~ cfl N ~' N N_ M O 1~ t~ O f~ N ~tl N O (Op ~y ~A pp ~ Z b'~ N oo ~ ~ R3 N v~ N ~ ~ ~ ~p ~ N ~ N ~ lC7 N D O N n i M .- t [) ~ u i r r > } ~ °~ U cn a O O O O O O O O O O O LL7 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 O O O O O O O O ~Li u7 ui c0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 Q O O O 00 Q ~ O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O ° r r r r r r r r U W O O O 0000 O O O O 00 O O 000o O O O O v O o O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O y. N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N CJ Q ~ ~ R' ~' ~' W' ~ ~ 2' ~' ~ ~ ~' Q' ~ ~' ~' R' O Q' O ~ O d' O ~ O ~' O Q~ g O H w O H w OO H H ww OOOO H H H H wwww OO H H ww OOOO H H H~ wwww O H w O ~ W H w ~ W F W H w H w H w a U J J J J JJJJ J J JJJJ J J J Q J J J J J J O Q. J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J (~ J J J J J J O O OO 0000 OO 0000 O O O O O O O O O U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U J U U U U U U LL OW ~ oQ N N CV N N C'J CJ CV N N NNN '7 CV N N N N N N N N ° J ° J ~ m m O z °o~ a ~ aJa ~~~ ~ Z ~ ~ QQ' g OJ°rr~ ~ ~~~ ° ~ m Q' ~ a ° ~ ~ ~z~ g w = wmw 2z= ~ ~ v ~ Z g ° z c ~ v ~ m°' vv w ~a,-~ F- ~~ ~cn co t-w~-N ~w~v ~ M v ~ v w a ~ `f w w ~ ,- o ~ ~ O 2 ~~ O wz ~= O O~O~ ~ ~ ~- Q z Q ~ z w z w = cn > cn ~ m u) ~ r- > cn ~ z ~ z C7 z v~ u) m = a ~ cn sS cn - ° ° J m ~ ,fir to ° O > ~ Z ° ° ° } } } } } } ° ) ZJ°J Q'Q' ~aaa a a a ~ ~ ° ~~3Q gg zzz ° ° ° ° z z z O W w W Y W W ~ Q' a ~ ~m ~ ~sy g > a Q cn 3 W ~~, a ~ ~M ~ aw ~~ ~~~~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ 2 O d~ Z~~~ » 000 Q ~ Q O O O ~ ~ cr> ~ ~ u) S F- > C7 f- F- > ~- z z z Q a a cn tLl z z z F- U °00~ = > > > > J J J J cOmmm ' Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U _ ~ ~ Z Z Z Z ~ ° `~ O ~~~ m m ° ~ ~ ~ `t ~ ~ J m ° Q °° zzzz wwww °° 00 aaaa v~cncncn ~ ~ z ~ ° ~ d J' g m o z p ~ SF = = Q S~ wwww ~ = Q w V ~ cn~n cncn r -r - ~~~~ p0 O w > n . ~ w = ~ ~- w O ~ ,~ = ~ a m o0 ~~ 0000 zzzz ~~ ~~ zzzz ~~~~ = ~ - a - S ~ ~ ua ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,- ° w _ N • i• H Z W< G W J W Z H H DC 0 N Z Q oc N _Z Z ~ J a ~ N ~ w FW- ' N Z w ~ w V V Q OI U U U U Z U Z U U U p O_ U H M N~ O Q ~ Q ~ N~ ~~ 0 0 0 O Z O Z O 0 0 W M ~ Q? N N M~ M N ~ Z N z N T r ( O N T p O T ~ ~ U ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° ° p ~ U cn-Q o o 0 o0o 0 a 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 00 04w ~ p Q o00 T T T 0 T 0 T 0 T 0 T 0 T 00 T T ~ U WI NN N N NO N NN } Q UJ 000 O O O ~Q W J U J JJ ~ J J J J J J J Q Q Q LL Owl z J N N N N N N N N N N Y Q J d O ua O) ~ Z ~ ~ ~ _ U ~ ~ g Q~ vrn ~ rn v ~ = w ~ z ~ ~ ~ z O ~ cn Q~~ ~ ~ w z ~ aN~ is cn ~ U ~ T> w p Q p m ~ p J D (7 ~ J ~ ~ z LL m ^ LaL ~ a Q H J Q p ~ (n Z Q`~Q+ ~' v ~ ~ Q-' m d' v Y fn } W Q ZZ ~ Z d (n ~ fA V) fn ~ fA H 2 } Q w ° ~ a ? a a ~ ~ J J O ~ Z Z Z UJ ~ Q p op m ~~~ ~ O z C7 Z ~~ W W W W p W Z zz t~~~ p a v o ~ ~ p W W W ~ ~ D O Q (~ ~ N .a N ~ ~ m ~ ~ 3 J p ~ y V O C o ~ ~ ~ g J N lU a 7 N k Z a C .C d C O .~` U m c .C a~ N c .Ol C W 2 U N U 0 N C~ Z w w J W Z ~_ N Q H DC a Z Q oc • Z Z oc a ~ N ~ W w ~ N Z w 2 ~ w oc ~ O V V c~ CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT I Table II - -3: Crash Locations with Greater than Five3 Crashes, 2 Number of I Crashes Intersection Fatalities Injuries I 29 S.R. 434 (p7 Tuskawilla Rd. 0 ~ I 1Q S.R. 434 ~ Fountain Tree Dr. 0 2 I 18 S.R. 434 Cad Timberlane Tr. 0 5 17 S.R. 434 ~ Parkstone Blvd. 0 8 I 17 S.R. 434 G_ Doran Dr. 0 5 I 15 S.R. 434 t'p~ Moss Rd. Q 2 13 S.R. 419 ~ Wade St. 0 5 10 S.R. 434 Cad Vistawilla Dr. Q 7 I 10 Tuskawilla Rd. Cad Trotwood Blvd. 0 5 10 S.R. 434 Cad Edaemon Ave. x, 0 3 I 10 S.R. 434 ~ S.R. 419 0 3 9 Tuskawilla Rd. CC7 Winter Sprinas Blvd. 0 0 C~ 8 S.R. 434 Cad Hayes Rd. 0 4 $ S.R. 419 Cad Edaemon Ave. 0 3 7 S.R. 434 Cal Central Winds Dr. 0 1 ~ S.R. 434 Cgs Cortez Ave. 0 ,~ 5 S.R. 434 (C7 Consolidated Service 0 4 ~ S.R. 434 t'a7 Belle Ave. 0 3 5 S.R. 434 Cad Sheoah Blvd. 0 0 ~ Winter Springs Blvd. Cal Northern Wax 0 0 Note: The crashe s listed above were crashes that the Citv's -t ``"~ter ~~r~ines Police De rJartment responded to in 2007 • SOURCE: Seminol e County Traffic Engineering, SieYer~ R A«~~~.,•o~ I I C' e. Sianalized Intersections The location of signalized intersections is shown on Map II-2. Most of the intersections in the City use stop signs rather than traffic signals. Traffic lights are located mainly along S.R. 434, S.R. 419, and Tuskawilla Road. f. Evacuation Routes The City dopted the Peace Time Emergency Plan in 1997. The plan outlines responsibilities for all departments in the City in the case of a man- made or natural disaster of local scale. For large-scale disasters, the City follows the County's Comprehensive Emergency Plan. This plan does not identify evacuation routes, as Seminole County is a "receiving area,,"; but lists the shelters available. All schools in the Citv~rt~ can serve as shelter sites. II-26 • CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 2. Public Transit System The fixed route bus transit system in Seminole County is operated by LYNX, which sc,}-~w ~'-~.~" ~~: focuses its service on Orange, Seminole, and Osceola counties, with some service to Polk Volusia and Lake Counties (see Map II-31. Table II-4 shows the public transit characteristics and ridership figures for 2003 through the first three quarters of 2008. T'l. «1_ l.. ,r,. o t !`' C \VI' c ~ d-F2n rni J a J i o z-i i~z ~i~9t33-~C~f3~R~~F~6 ~&3i~6~El- ~¢&~-~ , #6tk~ \ T 1,1 T7 2 ,.1... .1. ,. ...l.t: :~ ,.L,,, .,~ ' ' ~ :. r= -- r--- c---~ r • --v - - Table II - -4: Public Transit Characteristics Route Service Area Davs Frequency Hours 17 92 S U Mon. to Sat. 30 min. 5:02 AM to 1 1:05 PM . - . 103 Casselberr to Sanford ( X ) Sunday 60 min. 6:24 AM to 8:05 PM 4 4 .R. 4 4 Mon. to Sat. min. 5:30 AM to 9: 07 PM 47 Oviedo - UCF Mon. to Sat. 60 min. 5:00 AM to 9:54 PM SOURCE: LYNX Website. October 2008 and LYNX personnel. Year Route 39 Route 103 Route 47 2003 652,765 52,081 2004 698,917 45,786 2005 739,886 46,946 2006 736,273 52,618 2007 765.245 50,049 2008 (Jan -Sep) ** 4$$`¢23 48,178 3 5 4 • * Does not include S.R.434 Crosstown route #434, which did not become operational until Aoril 2009. ** In mid-August 2008 Route 39 was split into two The northern r2artion of the old Route 39 is now Route 103 which follows the same path from Casselberrv to Sanford. SOURCE: LYNX II-27 • • N Z CC d. N nc w H Z V Z w w J W Z O Q O d N Z Q oc Z Q J a w N Z w w a a 0 V N CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT • ~ id~- ~ j r ~J~~ T ~ r t ~~ o ~ee~ere a eerr - e , ~rxee~ere e Presently LYNX buses serve two routes adjacent to the City. Route 103 generally follows the U.S. 17-92 corridor from Sanford to Casselberry. Route 47 arimarily serves Oviedo from the University of Central Florida to Oviedo Marketplace. Neither link provides any service on S.R. 434 in the vicinity of the Town Center. A new east-west route (Link 434 also known as the S.R. 434 Crosstown, connects Routes 103 and 47. The Crosstown service begins at Oviedo Marketplace, and runs along S.R. 417 to S.R. 434 then follows the S.R. 434 corridor through Longwood and Altamonte Springs terminating at the Rosemont Superstop in northwest Orlando. This service, funded by FDOT and Seminole Count, is to be a 2-year demonstration project beginning in April 2009 It will provide the City with a much needed bus route to the City's major traffic generators. The route will be a feeder route, providing connecting service to the planned Longwood Commuter Rail (SunRaill Station. SunRail is scheduled to begin service in 2011. As public transit service is implemented, the C~ will coordinate with METROPLAN ORLANDO and LYNX to assist in maintaining the County's adouted LOS of 1.03 revenue miles per capita per year. 3. Parking System At this time, the City~f~ ' does not have any significant public parking facilities. Major events which demand additional public parking are accommodated by a coordinated and cooperative effort between the City and private landowners. 4. Bicycle System I The FDEP 's Office of Greenways and Trails owns, and has sub-leased to Seminole County, the Cross Seminole Trail, a portion of which I is located in the City ~ The Seminole County Parks and Recreation Department is in charge of maintaining the trail. An Interlocal Agreement exists between I the City~~"~ .' .and Seminole County regarding use and maintenance of the Cross Seminole Trail. The City :'s Parks and Recreation Department assisted with the design of the restroom facility located at the Black Hammock trailhead, located within the jurisdictional limits of the City, and is responsible for the maintenance and cleaning of the restroom facility. A 1.8-mile section of the trail corridor along S.R. 426 (south of Red Bua Lake Road) is owned by FDOT. The trail currently runs from Layer Elementary School in Winter Springs to the intersection of X434 and ~e-1~e~S_R. 426 in downtown Oviedo_ Other built sections of the trail include from CR 46A south to Greenway Boulevard in Lake Mary and from Mikler Road to the Orange County Line. The Cross Seminole Trail connects with the Seminole Wekiva Trail via the I-4 Pedestrian Bridge in Lake Mary. Upon completion, the Cross Seminole Trail will Abe a 34.5 mile Iona continuous trail linking Altamonte Springs. Longwood, Lake Marv. Winter Springs, and Oviedo and connecting to the Cady Way Trail and the Orange County Trail System. The trail will run from Spring Hammock Preserve in Winter Springs to Howell Branch Road at the Orange II-29 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT County Line and will connect §several parks including: Central Winds Park, Soldier's Creek I Park, Big Tree Park, Greenwood Lakes Park, Sweetwater Creek Park, Torcaso Park, Lawton House Park, and Spring Hammock. The trail will also connect seven schools: Layer Elementary, Winter Springs High School, Indian Trails Middle School, Keeth Elementary, Trinity Preparatory School, Oviedo High School, and Lawton Elementary. `~'~~~ > > ~~ The Cross Seminole Trail is currently under construction from the Oviedo Mall to S.R. 434. Design is complete on the segment from Mikler to Red Bua Lake Road and construction is scheduled to begin in late 2008. A pedestrian overpass is programmed to be constructed over Red Bua Lake Road beginning in the fall 2008. with a connection to S.R. 426 near the Oviedo Mall. The trail will also be realigned by the FDOT S.R. 426 widening project. The trail will cross at the signalized intersection of Marketplace Blvd 8~ S.R. 426 and connect with the trail corridor alonq Aulin Avenue. Existing and future portions of the Cross Seminole Trail are depicted in the Recreation and Open Space Element. The Conceptual City Trails Network Map, located in the Recreation and Open Space Element, identifies opportunities for increased bicycle and pedestrian connectivity in the City. The City has had recent success in securing funding for bicycle and pedestrian amenities through FDOT grants and the "Safe Routes to School" program. The City should continue to explore opportunities for implementing additional interconnecting bike routes and trails. As the Town Center and GID develop, there may be an opportunity to provide shorter and easier bicycle and pedestrian connectivity between these activity centers. The configuration of the Cross Seminole Trail will take the trail from the Town Center south across S.R. 434 via an overpass, then east to the Black Hammock Trailhead where a second S.R. 434 crossing would be necessary to provide access to the GID to the north. Options for a more direct bicycle f pedestrian route north of S.R. 434 linking the two centers could be considered by the City, but is should be noted that a wetland crossing would be required and undeveloped property might need to be purchased. The City could explore provision of pedestrian and,or bicycle accommodations along S.R. 434 that would provide a less direct route, but would likely minimize additional right-of-way needs. As noted above, the corridor could be shared with local transit service linking the Town Center and the GID. 5. Pedestrian System II-30 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT `I'lle analysis of existing pedestrian conditions found that the Cit~was well served by sidewalks but encouraged identification of missing links and prioritization of improvements to enhance pedestrian connectivity. The Cross Seminole Trail discussed in the Recreation and Open S,.pace Element offers alternate pedestrian and bi~cle paths into the heart of the Town Center and equestrian /hiking trails around the periphery. The City has coordinated with the FDOT regarding various issues concernin S.R. 434 and general agreement has been reached on resolving many of the issues such as access involving the pedestrian-oriented Town Center area. However, the issue of posted roadway speed limits on S R 434 through the Town Center has not yet been resolved. FDOT will require a detailed engineering study to justify the City's request for a lower speed limit, in accordance with the applicable Florida Statutes. A speed study for S.R. 434 was conducted by FDOT in 2008 which resulted in reducing the posted speed limit from 50 mph to 45 mph from Central Winds Parkway to Tuskawilla Road. Further reductions may be achievable in conjunction with development of the Town Center. Approximately 1.5 miles of S.R. 434 passes through the area designated on the Future Land Use Map as Town Center. Presently, this portion of the highway is part of a segment considered a Class I arterial with less than two signalized intersections per mile. At least one additional traffic signal within the Town Center area is planned at Michael Blake Blvd. which would result in more than two intersections per mile. As the Town Center continues to develop, it will be appropriate to readdress how the Town Center area is viewed in terms of roadway class and to work with FDOT to determine if the Town Center segment's characteristics should result in the segment being designated a Class II arterial with 2 to 4.5 signals per mile. The designation of the segment as a Class II arterial would allow for a change in the speed limit (currently 45 mph) to as low as 35 mph according to FDOT's generalized characteristics of arterial classes. A reduction of vehicle speeds on S.R. 434 through the Town Center would result in an environment much more conducive to the high levels of pedestrian activity anticipated for the Town Center at buildout. Such a reduction in vehicle speeds would be supported by FDOT's mission, the four key components of which are safety, mobility, economic prosperity, and the quality of the environment and communities. Although the Class II arterial designation would be based on an approximately 1.5 mile segment (FDOT guidelines for arterial facility analysis have a general recommended length of at least one mile). it might be appropriate to have a reduced speed limit only in the core of the downtown area. The City has identified the kev corridor as being a 0.6 mile segment from Doran Drive to the Cross Seminole Trail Bridge. It should be noted that a 35 mph speed limit is currently in effect on S.R. 434 for an approximately 0.3 mile distance in downtown Longwood. To create a central core downtown pedestrian friendly district in the Town Center, retrofits to S.R. 434 will be essential to the existing streetscape. Coordination will be necessary with the Florida Department of Transportation to address proposed hardscape and landscaping alternatives including the narrowing of vehicular travel lanes, the demarcation of bicycle lanes. the addition of landscaped medians, on-street parking, and pedestrian crosswalks. Coordination with FDOT will also be required to determine if a policy constraint to prohibit the widening of S.R. 434 in the Town Center area is appropriate. II-31 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 6. Intermodal Facilities Intermodal facilities are those transportation elements that accommodate and interconnect different modes of transportation and serve interstate, intrastate and international movement of people and goods. Some facilities considered intermodal include ports, airports, bus stations and train terminals. The Intermodal Surface Efficiency Act (ISTEA) legislation encourages the provision of efficient access to these intermodal facilities. There are no public airports within the City limits. The closest public airport is qtr Orlando- Sanford International Airport in Sanford. In late 2008, the facility was served by five airlines with regularly scheduled service along with several charter airlines. Direct flights are available to 31 destinations in the United States as well as four European cities. The City ~ ~ as only one active rail line within the City limits. It is operated by CSX and runs along S.R. 419 and terminates just east of Wade Street, within the Citv'sc~-~~-i Industrial areal~~. It is currently used for freight trains only. FDOT, in cooperation with the federal and local governments, is planning to implement a commuter rail project (SunRail) that will follow a generally north-south route alona 61 miles of existing track. The first phase. to consist of a 32.5-mile seament, will run from Orlando to DeBary and is anticipated to be operational in 2011. Twelve stations are planned for the first phase, with the nearest one to the City to be located in Lonawood. LYNX's planned 434 Crosstown route will be a feeder route, connectina the City with the SunRail system. Until very recently, Seminole County was serviced by Greyhound Transportation Services with a bus terminal in Sanford. That facility is no longer included on the list of stations shown on the company's website. The City ~~`-~~e~*~ is located along the south shore of Lake Jesup. The lake is currently used for recreational boating and fishing. Tn-fir ~r-=a~:~'~-ice ,Although it was used for steamboat transport services in the late 1 800's, the lake is no longer used for transportation purposes. D. TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS Transportation can have a major role shaping the spatial and functional organization of a community. It can determine the size, scale, status and identity of a community. However, there are other contributing factors that need to be considered, such as the personal, social, physical, environmental, economic and cultural attributes of the community. This section will analyze existing conditions of the transportation system to provide a comprehensive assessment of the various transportation facilities and services, and their relationship with existing land uses. This section will also address growth trends, travel patterns, and interactions between land use and transportation, including the compatibility between future land uses and transportation systems. I The Citv~` ~ ~ ~ is an integral part of the Orlando Urban Area. Additionally, the City is one of the larger municipalities within Seminole County and is located primarily between two II-32 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT principal arterials, S.R. 434 and Red Bug Lake Road. As such, transportation planning for Winter Springs requires close cooperation with other planning efforts within the Orlando region and Seminole County. For this reason, the transportation planning methodology used to develop the transportation plan must necessarily be compatible with transportation methodologies in adjacent jurisdictions. In order to accomplish this requirement, extensive use of data sources and planning models from the Orlando Urban Area Transportation Study (OUATS) and the Seminole County Transportation Management Program (TMP) were used in the development of the City's`v ~~ Transportation Plan. Existing deficiencies on city, county and state systems were defined and Capital Improvement Programs identified to resolve these transportation deficiencies. Forecasts of anticipated land use/socio-economic activities for 2010 were made and the validated transportation models applied against them. This allowed the definition of future capacity deficiencies so that funding sources can be developed to correct these deficiencies. 1. rowth Trends • The 2000 U. S. Census reported a City population of ~HF~i30.860, and a total of 12,296 dwelling units. ~ietr The population projections pe~ised in ~nnn :~a:,.,.~~ ~~.,.~ ~r.,. the Comprehensive Plan anticipate a population , resi~e-of 35,857 for the year 2010, x40.319 for 2020. and 44.538 for 2030. 'T'hese figures are lower than corresponding figures from the Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing ~ --a r.. ..aa:.: ..i ~ ~~n a. ou: ter.,, r: ro.. a "~ ~,.1 ._r 1 /_ A7G ._ c , .. ~le-~ ~ ,.~.~---.. ~~... a,.~~ ~__ -r e 7 ..i._a..a `'-_(36.929. 43,114, and 47 921 respectivelx~. The projections reflect somewhat slower growth than anticipated earlier which will assist the City in ensuring transportation facilities can be provided concurrent with ~'_-~ C~_:; ~~`'_---`~~ a-__ evelo~ment. 2. Roadway Current Performance The 1985 Growth Management Act established two important responsibilities for local governments. The first was to set OS} standards for public facilities within the jurisdiction as part of the comprehensive plan. The second was to ensure that the public facilities and services proposed in the Capital Improvements Element of the local comprehensive plan were available concurrent with the development. The Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) requires that adopted ;•e~ ' ~c ~~ ~~"~LOS standards be achievable and financially feasible. The standards set a minimum service level that the City must maintain for each of the public facilities, including roadways. I The roadway LOS concept is defined in the FDO'h {1~AA~~ Quality/Level of Service Standards Handbook (2002) as a qualitative assessment of the road user's perception of the quality of flow, and is measured by a scale of driver I satisfaction. The scale ranges from "A" to "F", with "A" g~-representing the most II-33 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT favorable driving conditions and "F" representing the least favorable. FDOT adopted statewide minimum'--~' ~`~ ~~---'~~LOS standards for the Mate highway system. The minimum '~~-~•~' ~` : ~~-'~•~LOS standards are used for planning applications, including the review of local government plans. The generalized maximum volume tables provided by FDOT are guidelines recommended for broad planning applications. They are I to be used as a general guide to determine highway'--~' ~` ~~°-~~~LOS and through-lane requirements. • , . , ~~ Minimum'--~' ~` -~---'-LOS standards recommended for the state system are shown arrin Table II-5. -,-..i_i,. rr ' ~~.~---~ Tables II-1 and II-2 show the ost recent traffic count results `"-and projected 2012 Levels of Service are presented in Table II- 7. The standardized descriptions of service levels used in transportation planning are as follows: • LOS A - A condition of road performance where traffic density is very low, with little or no restrictions in maneuverability. Drivers can maintain their desired speed with little or no delay. • LOS B - A condition of road performance where traffic density is low and vehicles travel with operating speeds somewhat restricted by other vehicles. Drivers still have reasonable freedom to select their speeds. • LOS C - A performance condition where operating speeds are determined by other vehicles, permitting a stable traffic flow. Drivers might have limitations to maneuver and to increase speeds. • LOS D - A condition of road performance where traffic density is high but tolerable. Fluctuations in traffic volumes may cause reductions in operating speeds. Drivers have little freedom to maneuver. In some instances, traffic flows approach unstable conditions. • LOS E -Represents traffic operation near the roadway capacity or maximum service volume. Vehicles flow at unstable conditions. Stop-and-go situations may happen. In freeways or limited access roads, speeds are near thirty (30) miles per hour and traffic density is high. • LOS F -This condition usually results from long lines of vehicles backing up because the traffic volume exceeds the roadway capacity. The vehicles are forced to operate at very low speeds. Stop-and-go situations are frequent and in extreme cases, vehicles stop for long periods of time. The 2002 FDOT Generalized Tables ere used b~~I~in 2005 to evaluate roadway performance in the Ciry~~ ' .- These tables have since been updated to 2007 FDOT Generalized Tables, which were used for more recent general analvsis (see Table II-G). A'~~-~~' ~` : ~~~~~~LOS analysis was performed to determine existing deficiencies. The capacity analysis was based on the FDOT Generalized Peak Hour Directional Maximum Service Volumes for different roadway types. II-34 • CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT U S 17-92 showed deficiencies in the 2012 forecast north of Shepard Road, where U.S. 17- 92 is a four-lane section Seminole Count~is Planning to widen this segment of U.S. 17-92 to 6 lanes• however the construction Phase of the ,Project is not funded and the schedule for construction is uncertain. Deficiencies were also identified in the 2012 forecast for S.R. 419 from U.S. 17-92 to S.R. 434, S R 434 from U.S. 17-92 to Moss Road, and from S.R. 419 to Tuskawilla Road. However. the forecast did not account for additional collector roads added within the Town Center In 2005 a traffic corridor study was Prepared to analyze the Town Center and it showed that S R 434 could accept the traffic from the Town Center at build-out for the developments. In addition to the Planned widening of U.S. 17-92. METROPLAN ORLANDO's 2025 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP~ includes widening of S.R. 426 to 4 lanes from Pine Street to S.R. 434 in 2010 and widening of Seminola Boulevard to 6 lanes from U.S. 17-92 to Lake Drive (a widening to 4 lanes was completed in 2008). The improvements within Winter Springs and the surrounding roadway network may alleviate or delay deficiencies identified in the 2012 forecast. Additionally, while use of the 2007 FDOT generalized tables may indicate that certain facilities may not be operating at an acceptable LOS, a detailed analysis of those facilities might show that they are in fact. operating at an acceptable LOS. Map II-4 shows the most recent LOS data available for the primary links in the City's network. • • Table II - 5: Statewide Minimum Level of Service (LOS) Standards for the State Highway ystem as Determined by ADT (total volume) Transifionina Roadwavs In i In ide Urbanised rbaniz Parallel fo Transoortalion TCEAs Constrained Areas. Urban d Areas Urbanized Exclusive Concurrence and ~in,~i, Areas, or n r Areas Over Tr it Management MMTDs Backlogged Communities 500,000 500,000 Facilities Areas Roadwavs INTRASTATE Limited Access Highway jFreeway) C C~DL DLE~ D E D(E1 ** Maintain Controlled Access Highway, C C D E E ** Maintain OTHER STATE ROADS Two-Lane C D D E ~ ** Maintain Multilanes C D D E * ** Maintain II-35 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT * Means the LOS standard will be set in a transportation mobility element that meets the requirements of Rule 9J- 5.0057. F.A.C. ** Means the Florida Department of Transportation must be consulted. Note LOS standards inside of r~arentheses apply to general use lanes only when exclusive through lanes exists SOURCES: FDOT 2002 Level of Service Handbook: Rule 14-94, F.A.C. 3. Future Roadway PerFormance The Florida Standard Urban Transportation Model Structure (FSUTMS) was used for all of the City's travel demand forecasting. "The traffic simulation process was accomplished as noted in Section 4 which follows. Consistency with the "ter-METROPLAN ORLANDO model (OUATS) data and traffic zone structure was maintained through the process in forecasting the city's travel demand. Table II-$7 shows the X2012 traffic conditions as projected. Deficiencies arc projected for U S 17-92 north of Shepard Road S.R. 434 from S.R. 419 to Tuskawilla Road, S.R. 434 from U.S. 17-92 to Moss Road, and S.R. 419 from U.S. 17-92 to S.R. 434. The projection does not take into consideration the additional collector roads added within the Town Center, which will help to alleviate the projected deficiency. Improvements to U.S. 17-92, S.R. 419, S.R. 434, and S.R. 417 are the responsibility of the State. T~..C:_'~_..'..,. ---""'~ C... -.. ,] .... T T C 1 7 (1'L, ~L. C C1. D A2A C ...~. . L ~~~nepa~e~er~~€>:er-~4det~~~e Fi l~es~S~r-~-~: a~~l-€~-t~-~e-C eer~e~~:~r-4161--€t=eta--~J.Ste;-~~Fe-€~lgetxe~~=e~x~tre-~3e An unfunded Count project need identified in the 2025 LRTP is the widening of Red Bug Lake Road from S.R. 436 to Eagle Circle. The City has completed numerous capacity and safetyprojects on City streets including turn lanes,~paving and drainage improvements and construction of the Town Center collector roads. • II-36 • • • CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Table II - 6: Generalized Annual Average Daily Volumes for Florida's Urbanized Areas (`til\TF.RRI'P'rt:DFLOW HIGHWAYS FREEWAYS Level of Service Interchange spacing > ~ mt apart [ands Divided A B C D E level ofServtce 2 Undtvidcd 2.200 7(><x) 15,000 21,300 27,IW Iartes A B C D f: 4 Ihvtded 21)51X) 33txji) 41,81X) 61,81:x) 70,20(} 4 23,$00 19,b00 55,200 67,100 74,6IX} h Divldcd 30,500 49.5(x) 71.(1(X) 92 700 105,4W 6 36,900 61,100 85,300 101,600 1 15,300 STATE TWO-N'Al' ARTERIALS 8 49,900 82,700 115,300 140,200 156,(}00 Class 11 X0,00 k~ 199 signalized intersections per mile) 10 63,000 104,200 145,500 l'b,90(} I96.4q) Level ofSenicc 12 75,400 125,800 E75,500 213.5£X} 227,11x) Lanes Divided A B C D E 2 Undivided •• 4,2(}0 13,800 16,400 16,900 Interchange spacing < 2 mi. apart 4 DrviJed 4,800 29,300 34,7(X1 35,700 ••• Level of Service 6 Divtded 7,300 44.700 52,100 53.5(10 •'• lanes A B C I) 1. 8 Divided 9,400 58,000 66,100 67.800 ••• 4 22,000 36,000 32,000 b7,2fx} 7h,5txi 6 34,800 56,500 81,700 105,800 120.200 Class [1(2.00 to 4.50 sigrtali~xd intersections per mile) 8 47,500 77,000 1 11.400 144,300 163,400 level of Service 10 b0,200 97,500 141,2(X) 182.600 207,6tx) lanes llrvided A B C D E 12 72,9(X1 118,100 170,900 221,1(X) 251,201) 2 [!ntintded •• 1,900 11,200 15,400 16,300 4 Divided •• 4,100 26,000 32,700 34,500 6 Divided •• 6.500 40.300 49,200 51,800 BICI'CI,E MODE 8 Divided •• 8,500 53,300 63,804 67,1Xx) (dote: Level of service for the bicycle riiode in this table a Irdatil on nvadway geometries to 4U mph posted speed and traffic conditwns. not numtx r of bicyclists Class III (more than 4.5 sigrisiizcd intrrsn~tions per mile and not using the facility.) (Multiply momnic~d vehicle volutncs shown below h) number within primary city txmral business distnct of an of directional roadway lanes to drtermute two-way maximum servicL vnlunies ) urhariized area over 750.(1(X1) Pavod Shoulder/ i.crel of Service Bicycle Lark i,evcl of Saralee I.atics Divtdcd A B C D E Coveragt .A B C ll Ei Urx[ivided •• •• 5,31X) 12,600 15,500 0-4946 " •• 3,200 13.800 ?13,8(x1 1 Divided •• •• !2.400 28,900 32,800 50.8446 •• 2,500 4,100 >4,IOU •'• 6 Divided •• •• 19,500 44,700 49,300 85-10046 3,IW 7,'+110 >7,200 ••• '•' 8 Diciikd •• •• 25,8!X1 58,700 63,800 PEDESTRIAN AfODE Class I V (more than 4 5 signalized imersectioris per mik turd within (Note: Ixvcl of service for the pedestrian made in this table >s tlrtsed on roadway primary cfi central business distnct of>H urbanised era gecmetrica au 40 mph posted spexd and traf['ic caiditions, tint nuttd+cr of pedestrians over 750,000) using the facilig~) (Multiply maorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of Level of Sm•ice directional roadway lanes to deteamine two-way maximum service volumes.) Lanes Divided A B C D E Level of Sexvice 2 Undivided '• •• 5,200 13,700 IS,000 Sidewalk Coverage A B C D E 4 Divided •• •• 12,300 30.300 31.700 p-4946 •• •• •• 6.400 15,5011 6 Drvidv~d •• •• 19,IW 45.800 $7,600 50.84•x6 •• •• •• 9.9(X} 19,(XXr R Divided •' •' 25,900 59,900 62,200 85-100°h •* 2,200 11,300 >11,3(X) ••• NOti-S'rAl'F. ROADWAYS BUS MODE (Scheduled Fixed Route) Major CityK'ounty Roadways t.evel of Service (Buses per hour) LtWel Of Stvv ICl` (Na4: awtr Da boa dawn rR nely fa the geak 1•tsr m eha •t4le+fhettl•o of Lhe hi b'h~e vanic tine I.anc-s IAvided A H C D E L.ovel of Scr~ xe Undrviekd •• •• 9,IW 14,600 15,600 Sidewalk Coverage A B C D F. 4 Divided •• •• 21,400 31,100 32,900 0.84% •• >5 >4 >3 ~2 6 Ihvided •• •• 33.400 46.800 49,300 85-ItXP/, >6 >4 >3 >2 ?1 ARTERIAL/~10;1i-STATE ROADWAI' ADJl5T1fE`.~iT'S 11<her Signalized Roadways (alter corresponding volume by the indi(~ted percent) lsignahzed intersection analysis) Level of Service lanes Median LcR Tttm Lanes Adjustrtient Factan !.apes DlcitEcd A B C D E 2 Divided Yes +SY• Utidnided •• •• 4,800 10.000 !2.600 2 Undivided No ~'OYo ~ Divided •• •• 11,100 21700 25,200 Male Llridivided Yes -545 Siwrce Florida [)apartment of Transportation OS/17K}7 Multi Uttdiv-itied No -254e S?stems Planning Office 605 Suwannee Street, MS 19 ONF.WAY FACILITIES Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450 Multiply the corresponding Mro-directional volumes in this table M 0.6 http. ~'wuw dotstate.ll.uslplanning/systemvsmJlos/detault.htm • Values dawn are parented o two-wn anrxW naragc dint. ,ol,es,•s fa In ds dsa,ia and m fa d,e asioerwDsta'use- sstodm uJess spauacdlt ti•bd Alatauat prasex•d octal.-,dome, tlK+, aettdh repsaatt p'tl knot dssayson cmdtteom with tpgltrmDle K and D faction appttee TMa uNe dos sae carotstuie • stadard sect ahoutd be ts•d awty fa geaerd plaewrsg applrcarseau The wnepxa ss,c Stir Gam wtwit tins ubk st (tensed sftestld De wed fa rnnre tpanGc pls•wng rppttca,tm The tabi• td dmving mnptna ertodds s}sotdd ad bt ,sect fa carsda a inbsa•cuaet dmign, where vise retisted acMpues raw. I.n d of ten sw IMIa ghee tlutealsotds sin pobaWy eta mn~araWe acso•t modes std, thae•fase, crest modal ewsnp+nturr dsodd he made wiat catam Fsrtltavaro, or>afbimsg lads of x•, ice of dsflami rtndea mro one o,ardl rodwfi ksd of sa.sa is sae teeasnroded Cdaula4au ue bead on pttanusg itypiscdsows of tae Hsghwr Capttah Metowt, &nYk I.UK Mudd. Padesttt+t I.US Model std Tswee Cattaeaw end Otadth of Stir isro Mam,d. raspeeu,eh fa Ste rnona6tieVUCk. biry eta p•dettnan std bus modes •'Cw,sn be acAsc,ed wu~ tattle sspW sdw defadts •••4oe applicat le ra dew !e.-d of smrce legn grade Fa autonabitsYtntcl. sspdte, .vftwna greuar titan 3asd orfatviw D Wconr f hxauaa mresxtion aap•p0a Igve bast n•thd Fa bi~~~da and pNestnsn ntodn. the Ind of sin uti Latta grade tmd,tdmg FI is not adtia,aDle, bocatsse Rsata' is sa enactta,os ralade totiutte tlredtdd tessng !able etpM vdaf dahetlie SOURCE; Florida Department of Transportation. 2007 Generalized Q/LOS Tables II-37 • N _Z Z ~ J a a N ~ W W F- N W LL W }0 < I-- O6 U U w M w J W Z H Q H DC O Z a • N Z Z ~ J a a N ~ W W 1 Z N Z 3 = W W ~O J_ a 0 O y G OI .~ D w W p w V ~ w V V V D w D V V O I O d O ~ F• ~~ N a0 CO N O N O CO O ~ O O• •O O ~O 00 O ~' O M •O O ~O ~O O I~ O M O M t\ O O ~ O P h O I~ h 0 N c0 0 a 0 W J O O ~ M ~O h •O •- ~ h M R V O U h I~ 00 M N h M N `0 h ^ O ^ ,~ N ~ y d N O N ~' M M M R M N v N N d' N N N try 00 W p1 r ~I Q~ O h O O O O O O O O O t\ O O '7 O O R O O N O O n O O h O n O O ~ O O h O O O 0 O O 0 OJ ; h M h M h M M M h M ~O •O ~O h M h M M h h (") h M h M h M O O ~ ~ K d' D Q I Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ V ~ _ ~ ~ O Q V O ~ ~ W F- Q W H ~ H ~ W H d' W H oQ` ~ W F ~ d' W F ~ DC W F ad ~ W ~ w J O w J O ~ W H ad Hq Q ~ W H oQ` UC W H oS d' F- oS O w J O LL OW O Q ~ V V' ~ Q V Q N N V V Q `O Q Q V V N NI Z ~ ~ w Z a ~ W 1 ~ ~ N z ~ N ° J m W ~ ~~ Q ~ Q ~ Q ~[ Q c7 J m ~ w H Q z O M M p -~ ~ ~ J Y w Q p ~ M ~_ m Q p Q z O N ~ N ~ ~ N H N w w ~ N ~ N ~ H w J w _Z > p ~ ~ N 1n w c G O ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 W ~ Z ~ Q N °~ w 1 ~ Z o ~ Y ~ J c~ ~ m g Q p ~ p~ > iy , ~ ~ N d N ~ N D J m _ M v ~ Q a ^ v = ~ z h ^ ~ W m ~ IA Q Y Q ~ H Z ~ ~ es ^ N Q p N ~ ~ N ~ OC In LL ~.' w F - ~ N Q 3 N ~ OC 1 ~ ~_ _ ~_ ~_ _ oc D oc Q ~ ^ ~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ M ~ M ~ O• V P ~ V' O Y W O Y Q Y ~ ~ 3 Y 3 Y d d O ~ N N N N N N w Fes- Fes- Fes- F=- Imo- N 0` W J W Z O Q DC O Z Q DC H • N Z Z ~ J a ~ cc `~ '.'-' >_ F' N 3= ~ w O 0 O y G of W u o o u v u v v u o 0 0 o v o u u ~I ~ .p I~ ~O ~O M I~ CO 00 N M O h V "I ~ p M O CV O M O V O N O V O 00 O h ~ O OD O h O P O O N O d O O O ~ O h ~ O O O 0 ~ h 0 p a D '~ O U 0 0 ~O ~O O N ~O N M M O M N M V N ~ O h h f0 P N W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~~ O O O O O O O O O O O `O O O O > O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N O O O ~ d' DC OC O.' DC OC d' ~ DC ~ DC 0_' R' O! ~ [L' y 3 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ ~ H U H U H u H u 1--- H u H Y- U /- u F u H u F- u 1- ~./ F-- u H u F u y w J J J w J w J w J w J w J w J w J w J w w J w J ~ J O O O J O J O J O J O J O J O J O J J O J O J O O J O J O u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u N N N N N N N N N N Q N N N Z N N ~ ~ > d r r r r ~ m m J ~ 3 3 J 3 3 °a o > 0 0 o ~ a ~ a d Q z z a z z a p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ w ~ O o! z v ~ ~ ~ m Z ,o ~ OC d ~ H H W H ~ 1- ~ F ~ N ~ Z Z r Z O J ~ O OC = DC O ~ O D! O O N 3 3 ~ c~ 3 z z c~ z ~ f ~ o r ~ O! Z a a q a a O N > J ~ 3 3 3 > a o O o a a ~ ~ O ~ J Z z Q ` 'I O g 3 3 ~ ~ w ~ w LL ~ 3 ~ ~ O Z Q "' ~ ? W W ~ N ~ W X ~ 0 ~ 0 O _ ~ a a > ~ 3 _ ~ c~ > ~ > ~ z c~ z z ~ a m r 0 d o_ N N J '' o a a a a J ~ o 0 3 3 3 3 3 0 ~ o o ° ~ ~ ~ z z z z z o N ~ ~ a O Q O W W W O ~ ~ ~ w w w ~ ~ ~ N N ~ O~G K ~ ~ z z z z z z w r Q m O f O ~ O z O z O z O z O z p ~ 3 3 3 3 3 ~ Q = ~- w J W Z O Q ~"~ O D_ Z Q DC I- • N _Z Z ~ J a a N ~ w W E" N >Z Z > 2 V ~V a 0 ~ of J o vl VI VI vl vl VI VI o o V o W O 6 O a " ~ ~° ~ W I _ I I QI I I M ~ P Q V O O O O O O O O O O O D O ~ ~ V OI ~O O O OI O O R O V ~O O I h O ~O ~O O V O h N W J 00 J CO ~ Q ~ OD ~ h ~ ~ ~ `O N Q Q ~ O d N O N `~ I N N Q CV ~ Q h O O O O O O O O O O O O J O O I O O O O O O O O O I ~ O O O O O O O O O O O C "~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q O O O O O O O O O O ti J Q r v 3 ~I G Q a J v w J I V O v w J V w J V w J v w J v w J V w J V w J w J w J v w J (J ~ J O J J O J O J O J O J O J O O J O J O J O °C V V V V V V V V V V V W y l N nl ~I cal cal NI ~I nl n N c~ O a Z J a o ~ Q (~ "' ° > ~ Q a V ~ v v ~- a oc O~ o O v ~ Q v v ~ ° ozc v o Q N ~ ~ N = a 3 `~ o o a = d Z N Q > d' w w > Q ° Q ~ W w g S ~ ~ o w J ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ,^^ , V z Z 0 _ g ~ d O O O O ~ O `n r N Z Z Z p ~n w O ~ °C ~ ~ ~ ,Q ~ ,- Q °a a a a > o o z z z a p O a J ~ z z O O O = a w ~ w O Q Z Z ~ O Q ~ I F "' ~ ~ u a = w N ~ ~ ~ o c _ v i ~ > p r 0 w w w • CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Table II - 8: Programmed and Planned Highway System Improvements Roadway Se ent Improvement Programmed Planned * ** t?S 17- Shepard Rd. to widen to 6 2010/2013 92 Lake Ma Blvd. lanes Mitchell widen to 4 2008/2009 S.R. 426 IIammock Rd. to lanes Pine Ave. Orange/Seminole widen to G 2008/2013 S.R. 417 County line to lanes S.R. 434 Pine Avc. to S.R. widen to 4 2U S.R. 426 434 lanes *a ' Seminola 1rS 17/92 tc~ widen to 6 2010 Y** * Contained in construction program of FDOT, Seminole County, or Florida's Turnpike Enterprise (METROPLAN ORLANDO Transportation Improvement Program 2008/09 - 2012 13 • ** 2025 Long Range Transportation Plan *** Latest data based on need from 2005 CPH Engineers transportation study) SOURCES: METROPLAN ORLANDO, CPH Engineers • Table II - 9: Programmed City mprovements Roadw Sc~ment Improvement Programme a d* S.R. at S.R. 419 traffic signal 2008/2009 434 im rovements Michae S.R. 434 to new Town Center 2008/2009 1 Blake Tuskawilla Blvd. roadway Blvd. S ine O~ Central Winds new Town Center 2012 2013 e Ave. Park to S.R. 434 roadway r Loo S_R. at Haves Rd. add deceleration lane 2008 2009 434 S.R. at Vistawilla Dr. add deceleration lane 2008/2009 II-42 • CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 434 I3aham .a '~ d. Shore Rd. to ~Ia 'es Rd. avin 2011 /2012 * Contained in the City's Five Year Schedule of Capital Improvements FY 08-~FY 13 SOURCE: City of Winter Springs. ~anuary 2009 4. Model Development and Validation To adequately forecast future traffic conditions in a rapidly urbanizing area such as the City ~ :, a set of transportation planning models must be developed and validated. In the case of the City~l~ ~ :, such models exist and these models have been previously used to develop City, regional and county wide plans. These models are contained in the model set documented for the Orlando Urban Area Transportation Study OUATS . In order to provide the more detailed analysis required for the City~r~~~, this model set was modified. These modifications include the development of a more detailed TAZ set (microzones), a more detailed highway network, and the use of the .T.,, "`TC"T °"T i`SUTMS ~~~~'~' ~` These changes require the validation of the model set used in this process even though this model set is derived from and closely resembles the OUATS model set. This model set has been modified as detailed below. • a. OUATS Model Set The transportation planning models used in the OUATSrIx-;~-~n~.~,-?~re~ have evolved from a set of models developed in the mid- sixties and based upon extensive home interviews conducted at that time. The model set is divided into four general functions and modifications to each of these functions have occurred over the last twenty-five years. b. Trip Generation The existing OUATS trip generation model is across-classification person trip production model with attractions calculated using expressions derived from regression analysis. This model currently uses 11 purposes including special generator purposed for the major tourist attractions, the various universities and colleges in the region, and Orlando International Airport. The model requires extensive data not generally available such as the forecast of the median income and car ownership by zone for the calculation of home-based productions. c. Trip Distribution The OUATS trip distribution model utilizes each of the 11 purposes for which productions and attractions are generated. Friction factors for each of these 1 1 purposes have been developed, although the special generator purposes generally borrow friction factors from other purposes. There are not K-factors utilized in the model. • II-43 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT I d. Modal Split f Auto Occupancy The OUATS model set includes amulti-nominal logit expression for calculation of splits of trips to the transit sector. Auto occupancy is calculated with simple rates I by purpose. The elrriodal split is system-sensitive in that it requires the coded description of a transit system. e. Traffic Assignment I The current OUATS traffic assignment procedure consists of a 4four-iteration equilibrium assignment with capacity restraint. This process is applied using network descriptions in accordance with the 1979 version of the Urban I Transportation Planning System (UTPS) developed by the U_S_ Department of Transportation. f. Trip Generation Modifications In order to make use of the data available from Seminole County and to avoid the necessity to forecast income and car ownership as required by the OUATS trip generation model, modifications were made to this model. The trip generation models used are based upon the OUATS models, but these models incorporate simpler rate expressions instead of the more complex cross-classification models. These models have successfully been used numerous times in Winter Springs and in the Greater Orlando area including ~:~:~~"-~°°;~ ~--a r~° Seminole County~~ ~rrede~. The models were used to forecast trip generation for the ~e-#~ar~ .City's 2005 Transportation Study and the 2007 Impact Fee Studer The models forecast vehicle trips instead of person trips so they additionally do not require a separate auto occupancy model.= n~v nxx~z g. Use of OUATS 1 1 Trip Purpose Models Since trip generation expressions were available for each of the OUATS non- special generator purposes, it was decided to use the entire 1 1 purpose models available in OUATS. This required incorporating the special generator expressions available from OUATS into the Winter Springs Model Set. This use of the full OUATS model purposes additionally permitted use of the OUATS friction factors. 5. Public Transit Performance The new LYNX route offers the potential to significantly increase the capacity of the City's transportation network: while reducing traffic congestion, pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. One average size bus at capacity can carry as many passengers (approximately 40 persons) as 10 or more private automobiles.- However, any impact in LOS for S.R. 434 will not be apparent (or documented) for several years. II-44 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Successful transit systems emphasize the land use and travel demand relationship necessary to address congestion problems. The most important factors in encouraging transit use are mixed land uses and an urban form, which provides street connectivity and access to the pedestrian, transit and bikeway systems. Transit facilities and ultimodal terminals also are important for the success of the transit system. These facilities allow for transfers among the various modes within the transportation system. Public transit '~~--~' ~~` ~~~---~~~~LOS criteria rare based on the operational and service characteristics of the transit system. Operational characteristics include the number of vehicles operated in maximum service, the amount of service supplied, the average speed, and the number of days the service is provided. Service characteristics include geographic location and service area population. These characteristics are monitored by the local transit provider, but the City could be monitoring '~~--~~': ~F : ~~-~~~LOS for transit performance based on headway standards. Headway is the time that separates vehicles moving in the same direction on the same route or track. The emphasis should be on reducing headways to encourage public transit ridership. The new LYNX :ri~Crosstown bus route snow serves all of the City's major traffic generators/attractors identified on ~- ~-Ma II- In analyzing access to transit service, elf}~~rr~~national plannina studies consider one-quarter to one-half mile on either side of the route a+i-c~eleethe maximum distance that people would be willing to walk to use transit. 6. Other Transportation Systems The City's current transportation network is based primarily on a road network serving vehicular traffic, with very little attention given to other means of transportation. The City needs to start establishing facilities that will encourage the use of alternative transportation systems. Parking is an essential component of the overall transportation system. The decision of a commuter to drive alone or to use alternative transportation modes such as ride-sharing or public transit depends to a large extent on the cost, accessibility and availability of parking. As the City grows the need for these types of facilities will increase. Bicycling is a viable mobility alternative. Bicycle networks provide a commuting alternative as well as a recreational asset. The City has made efforts to establish a bicycle system. However, the adopted five-year plan was not achieved within that timeframe. The existing bicycle plan will need to be updated to plan for the expansion of the current system. , Subsection 335.065. F.S., requires with only a few exceptions. that bicycle and pedestrian ways be established in conjunction with the construction, reconstruction, or other change of any state transportation facility. Pedestrian mobility is greatly influenced by the mix and proximity of land uses as well as the availability of adequate, unencumbered sidewalks, liahtincy and other pedestrian facilities. Adequate land uses and appropriate urban design would encourage walking for short trips and for accessing transit facilities and services. The City Code currently II-45 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT • requires developers to provide sidewalks in new subdivisions. 7. Future Transportation 1P}a~Plannins~ This section provides recommendations for creating a safe, convenient, and energy efficient ~-~;~~ultimodal transportation system, coordinated with future land uses, plans and programs of the Seminole County, METROPLAN ORLANDO~B,, and FDOT. Since World War 11, roadways have been designed primarily for automobiles. Very little attention has been given to accommodating other modes of transportation such as bicycles, pedestrians, and transit. The goal of this Transportation Element is to look at roads as ultimodal interconnected transportation corridors, and design them accordingly. Intergovernmental coordination is essential for the most cost-effective provision of transportation system improvements. Clearly, the City oes not possess the resources nor is it fiscally responsible for the entire transportation system within the City. Seminole County and FDOT have financial responsibility for county roads and state highway system roads, respectively. Therefore, it is necessary for the City to review the transportation improvement plans and programs prepared by the County and FDOT. In this way, the effort and dollars expended by the City to improve its traffic circulation system may be complemented and perhaps enhanced by the activities of the County and FDOT. • One area of coordination should include the preservation and protection of rights-of-way for identified future roadway improvements and construction. With the escalating value of land and costs entailed in right-of-way acquisition it is essential that the City protect roadway corridors in advance - f development. Increased right-of-way costs reduce the funds available for actual construction. The City needs to utilize such techniques as setback requirements, zoning restrictions, right-of-way protection regulations and official transportation maps to preserve and protect existing and future rights-of-way. Other measures are discussed in the policy section. a. Future Transportation Map The purpose of a Transportation Map is to graphically depict the location of all proposed collector and arterial roadways and any limited access facilities, airports, rail lines, and other related facilities. ~4a~-~-SMap II-5 presents the proposed Future Transportation Map for the City e€-~ - This map shows the proposed roadway functional classification and number of lanes for each roadway segment. Roadway capacity is based on the functional classification and number of lanes. The'~~--~~' ~F~-~~-~--~~LOS standard selected for each roadway was based either on its present or forecasted performance. The map shows the network as it is planned for the year 2010, with several roads at a LOS D, which is an acceptable standard. Map II-6~ shows the .~~~eeded improvements. -~l~~e~ ~H~a~e-1~ -r-~~-r-~~~~~~ • II-46 w J w Z O Q O a Z a • v c7 z_z ~ J a a N W w 1 Z ~ Z ~ w oC ~O V V w w J W Z ~_ H Q H DC a Z Q oc • v N Z Z ~ J a. n. ~ W W Z N .Z 2 ~ w V V CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Future roadway design will need to incorporate bicycle, pedestrian and transit features to achieve a true ~~•~~~~ultimodal system. In addition to incorporating roadway design standards in the City Code, the City will start requiring that new developments be interconnected to enhance the transportation network. Development design must provide connectivity and access between adjacent residential developments and nearby land uses. Traffic calming techniques can be used to protect neighborhoods~althouah street design that utilizes curving streets and on-street parkina will naturally reduce speed and the need for other traffic calming methods. b. Transportation Concurrency Alternatives Several alternatives are available to the City to assist in meetina Florida's concurrency management requirements in the Urban Central Business District (Town enter and Isewhere in the community. These alternatives are provided for in Chapter 163. F.S. and Rule 9J-5. F.A.C. The statute recognizes that planning and public policy goals may conflict with the requirement that transportation facilities and services be available concurrent with the impacts of development. and it provides for exceptions from the concurrency requirement for transportation facilities if certain criteria are met. Available alternatives include a Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA), a Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA), a Long-term Transportation Concurrency Management System (LTTCMSI, a Multimodal Transportation District (MMTD). a Transportation Concurrency Backlog Area (TCBA). and an Urban Infill and Redevelopment Area. An extensive discussion of each alternative and some of the requirements that must be met is included in the City's 2008 Evaluation and Appraisal Report. . ., ., - ., ., c. Future Public Transit Plan A transportation system that offers ~~~-~~~ultimodal opportunities has the potential to absorb a significantly higher number of person trips than a system that focuses solely on accommodating vehicle trips. Improved transit service frequencies and new routes offer a viable transportation alternative and promote transit use. eke-With the new LYNX Crosstown route, the City will need to II-49 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT • • work closely with METROPLAN ORLANDO`'-moo, LYNX, and ~~ Seminole County to coordinate its support and #iei~#eparticipation in the transit system _ The City will help achieve increased ridership by improving pedestrian access, encouraging compact development, . , nd requiring the provision of transit facilities and amenities where rieeessar~wa rra nted. d. '','~~--~---~~-Pedestrian Planning >>_.. t._r.....,.~}In order to develop a pedestrian improvement/construction program to address~City streets lacking sidewalks, a E~ecity-wide inventory of sidewalks, crosswalks and other pedestrian facilities must be completed. By identifying missing links in the pedestrian system, the inventory will allow prioritization of improvements. Implementation of these improvements will provide pedestrian connectivity to the overall transportation system. Particularly important will be an inventory of sidewalks within one-auarter to one-half mile of the new LYNX Crosstown bus route. e. ~''-Bicycle Planning An important action needed by the City in the immediate future is the planning of a ity trail system to interconnect with the LYNX Crosstown bus route and the Cross Seminole Trail.__Such a system could result in reducing vehicle miles traveled and increasing bus ridership by providing alternative transportation options. The City currently owns a substantial portion of FP8~L easement which could be the beginnings of this network. In order to accomplish this, several policies relating to trails have been added to the Recreation and Open Space Element. Bicycle lanes should be implemented on existing roadways, where right-of-wax allows. f. TSM~TDM Strategies Transportation System Management (TSM) and Transportation Demand Management (TDM) are options for communities trying to add roadway capacity without having to construct costly new facilities. The ultimate goal of the TDM program is to influence people to shift to more efficient modes of transportation and to travel during off-peak hours. TSM strategies, on the other hand, aim to affect the actual supply of transportation services. The most effective policies integrate supply and demand strategies to create a transportation network that II-50 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT I promotes efficient choices. The City fr€~` ~ .' ~ oes not currently offer any of these programs. However, they are options to consider in the future. • • II-51 w w J W Z O Q O d Z Q • v ZZ ~ J a d ~ w H ~ Z N Z W O a O V V i= ' - ~ i r ~ ~ `7, G. -r s ~ ._ ~ v ~ r s ,; T -f N y r a ~° ~ . i s -~ j ~~. "J' r ~~ O: 'G` » T `Y x JG .~a ~r Y - i ~ ~ T - ? ~ ~ r• K ~ ~ s ~1 r ~ a S - _- _; - r x r .~ _ A, ~, ~ Y ~ ~ _ l . . I & - _ Y . - LLB 5' cY, 'S` x ~ a K I~xJ :Y ~ :i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a s a a a a a x .~ " ~= s rtl I K ^t ^t c:i `~ ~;,. i+ r G r. ^ K R' v, ~-' r ~ w ,~. a' ~ ` F ~ s 7 r ~ u ~ ~ ~ x i ~ a c2 tl :n ~ ;J a. 5 -y ,~ <, r ? ~ a y ' a '~ & ? ~ K 'S 2 ~ ^ ~; + s ~ 3 = .: ~' '~ .: a r~.' . Y M T y r ; r ,? a 't~~ Sr -r 3i~. .r ~r 3 ~ ± a a v~ cn v. ;n ti n , W ~ J F- ~^ ~ ~ ~ ~r Cd i s , t Y r w ~ ^~ ':f ~. ~, ~f~ ~4 i~ :i ,\ \\ w w J W Z O Q O d Z Q • N Z Z ~ J a a N W W ~_ Z N Z Z / ~ H O U U :- - i _~ I ,,, f .. C. ~:. ,. U V G u _ G C.i hJ ~ C ~J _ + ~ ~. .~ +~ f ~ r ~ .T ~~ / ~ w^ _ •`~ 1. ^ . - := ., r w a W ~ x w ~ uGi, x ui x _ ` ~' ,r ,i , a 1 .! '" >A 4 7. x-t '? a x zw w z3 5 _ cX :: ~ ~ x p3 '-' .~ '~' ~ x .a: ~ W ~ sW a x ~ a :~. ° d .a F- .. ~ ~ ~ ,+> Z a ~ ~ r.~ 7 ~. z~ ~ ~ ~ G ~m ~' :~ ~ G ~~ N J m ,3J. ' a L G ~m ~ ~~ 3m ~ x: ~ p 5m ~ ~ r a O ~ a ~ G ~ z 4 ". C 'J -: ~~ ~ r. ~, ~ s y ;,, - ^r ~~ ~ M w w J W Z ~_ H DG Z Q • N Z CC Q a a. `~ W I~ Z N Z 3W VV i - _~ ~ ?% - r., ~ _ - _ - 'i ti '7 i - T _ r.; v ~~ .., 'v V 'J C.' G .~ .. CJ U r "' : ~ ~ ~ .~. _ G d Y ~ ~ C ~ e L =- ~ ~ .~.r _ r 'r r ~. J a t., a h• ~ 4 ~ ~. ~ 4' r 4' ~ ~ V X i r 1 1 1 : -r ~ d ~ K y, ~ ~ Pa ~ W z ,~ ~ u tk ~ Q 2., `.J j v n 5 ~~.+ v ~ .. y r ;r _ _ ~ :~c w i3 T ~ ~-3 ~ ~s -t _ ~ ~ .i rm u^ a a ~ a x aJ s~ ,,, i ~ ~ a' _~ ~ W ,~.~-, G ~ d r U z J ~; ~' W ..' W ~ ~ ~~ v: ~ ;~ i-1 i-^ W ~ !_ cW[77 W ~; .G ,~' uJ ? 1 ~ 41 ~ ~ E'{., ;n Q Q ^ a Z, F=~ Ci r oa y; td ~ G as w I «-] :;. n r ~' -~ CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT I ~vn_ T'~i~v~ic~26irswzm-vie$~,.•.ccr'cnairni'~cci circ.~rSZ~ I ~p~~+~~~+ p~ I ~orl'fol'4diTEa -lO tH-HMd~R-t- ~l / C Avr-.- Tr.-rncrTrT I • This Table Struck • a ~ 4 a 8 ~F~'r4~4-TIM€€R~!!NE T-~ °A,;;_ ~5 4 4 8 a-4 4 a 8 ~ ~ ~ a S ~- ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ 3 8 ~ ~ 4 8 8 ~ 5 8 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 8 ~ ~ 8 8 ~ ~ ~ Co AAA n r~no~r~~ ~. ~ 4 a ~ ~ 4 8 CD A4A n CL.ICDDV A\/C ~ ~ ~ a a CD A4A rnl QCI I C AVC ~` ~ '~ a a d ~ ~ a CD A']A /:.l LIAVCC CI'1 ~ ,~, ~ a G V ~ / ~ V / ~ V CD A'2A /nl C/ll IAITAIAITDCC ~ ~ ~ a a II-55 i• i• CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT i This Table Struck • II-56 w J W Z 0 Z Q • N _Z Z ~ J °~ a N w w> Z N 3= ,~ W o~ ~o ~~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ I o i o ~ j i i I i I ~ ( ~ I ~~ =~ - __' ~ i [a c~ U G o O ca C_S c o O I 44 i 1 . ' ~ ~ i 4% r , i ~ I T ~ I ( i ; , . LL c I a o ~ i a •~ ~ I 1 x ~ ~ 4 -• _ - _._ ._. ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ LL 'G r, ~_, "t '~ l~ _~ t N ~ o ~ I I ~ p ~ i ti m ~ r i . i i 1 . ._ _. _. .. ~ ...._j i ......t .__ __ _ _ __. i .._ ! A^ G ~ I ~ I 4 `n. A - ~ ~ 1 i 7. Y , 'r+ ~ ~ G 1N (^d ~t~l1 N ! I C ' ~ »n W ~ ~~ ' C ~.~ rfj O D+ ~ rl! Cd N ^ rfi ~ M 4F N ay O ~ ~ f.i .n rlii l~-,~ ~ 4:": n, y) r-.. '~^ N ~ i i ~ t C yNy _ ~ I i. __ ~ ' I ~ ~ i i i i I xi ;a ~ ! ~ .- ~ ~ ~ .L ~ m J V ~' ~ r:.. o- ~ ~ m ~ i a~ i i ' : a a ~ ... ~ ~ ~ i' d i ~ i ; ~ ~ ~~ r. ... ^I :~ ` ~ y __ ~- ~?( cNr1 9 ts ~ ~ U ~ C '~ ~--5 ~ ~ c~ O ~ w ~ r `~ ~ ~~ ~ 0 ,` ~ a LL a d.. a l~a ~~ ~ ~~ tI L ~ C ~~ ~ ~ ,, ~; if ~ ~ ~ ' ~ .n ~ ` ~ u1 cs ~~ 4) ~ R7 dl (U rXN~ aL •C -_ ~ va ~~9 t~J 4F ~ ry y tC~ W M y 41 -2 C3 .f f~~i U a ~ O ~ G_ ., C v t" 9 ~ .g +fi C1 O n ~Y; I 2+ C `-v C ~ ~ Qj I c ~ dF cn "'a 3 rJ ~ e4 ~ . `' nj Zs GJ 4d t F• C " [~ m ~ m CJ C.~ ~l? 'S r t c~ `r~i M w U z .lj U ~ U !8 Y tU Y c~ t U L i.7 7 r 7 r- ~~ Vi t'd i,- i~ L v t v L ~ m N m -. ~~ F FJ t:i a _ t) . t~ ce~ r'- ~ . ~' __ ,~ ~. - ~ r ,-_, r- r-. ,~ r N -. N r- N °-_ N r-~ N r--, (^J r N r-. M -. N r-. ^-1 - n r "1 S'J o: N _ N a.. N z, aN. :eN J nl ~l C'J .u ~V rc, fV r N s• N ,-z N __ [V a: _ J f- w w J W Z O Q 0 z Q V ZZ ~ J ~ a N ~ w H > Z N _ Z 3= ~ ,~ W o~ ~o j ~ ~ ~ Q ~ I _ ~~ j ~ j '~ 1 1 ~ i ~ - i o ~ ~ ( o O ~ I , , ~ ~,,, c~ ~., i ! Ica ,. ~ 1 1 .~,1 ~; , ~ ~~ a ~ ~ . ~- ' 1 ;;~~ 1 ,~ ii II , i ,~1 i!' ; o ~ ~ . ; ~ i '' __~T.._.t.....i ~ _ .Q. L ~' ~ - - ; • . , ~ } r ,_ _~ } ., " ~~ ' } ~ I il . ~ ~a ; ' __._ , - ~ ~ 1 , ,; ~ ~( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , j ~ ~ ~_~_ t ; W ~ N ~ - yn tTe Q~ t11 W r~J e} y ' i ~ ~ ~ ~ '? .-. `R ~n 4 61 ~ U~ M r ~ r`J ^ 1 'V r ~ P t ~~~ _ _ I ' i ~ K , fv'I ~ ~, ~ ~ ' 1 ' ! i ~ 1 ~ i i Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d n U ( ~ ~. T1 l l I ~; a~ ~ ~ ~ S ~' "~ % ~ _ ~ ti ~ ~ i L i i I . k ~ 1Q y ~ L ~ ` ~ " v, y ,- ~ y M 1. rv~ V 3 ~ t ~ ~ n ~ (~ C .~ L L ~ c ~ ~ ^~ `" > li ~ 1 F-`i .;., ~ 4 -' 'a ~., ~ y ~~ ~ 1 <' I= L I 9 ~ i i c' ! ~t^ cr" ~ s- ~'t] ~t t u _ s ` .~ .~ s' ~ r LLA - ~ I F .r~ § L ii ~<" ~ rs -~C ~ t ) ° ~ z d a " rR 4 a LL ., ~ ~ i a~,i) C~ ~ r m _ ll w ~(L G ~, Ip ~ fyi 1 ~t. ~ ~.t I r 0. ~ ~' '5 t`S I ~U .. ' e~ I -, b b ` ' ~ d ,a c a, ~', rs ~ ~ s n ~» n x i' ~ ~ n ~ c ~ E ~ r ~ ~ o, ~ t " :i ~ M r; u ~ n v ,~ s 1 ` - ~ ~ro y i ~ c su c 'v s ~ a, ~ .n M %n m x r ~ ~a V d r ~i u to T' O _ ~ rt c. sn a c i ~ ~ . Y t- ~ 4•- U `1 U1 1-- , 1- F- .-~ r~ S Q F- :~ F- F- C: {- f- Y I. , ern .~ Jl ~ '. W L1 d 0-. tf 6 ~ ~ ~- r -. ¢7 Y W U i")r`') u3 R: M P] ~ M T M R t'1 fIJ M CQ CG n1 ,YI M :G'~ n~ rG M !l~ [`") 2 .^') Q+ M m :ry i4" M ~ ~•9 .G 2 R ..}} 03 +y rX` .{ CV ~~qq K) . ~ '~ 4 2 -~ d n Cb ta') S) Il? Z to W L` V? aS ~ IXi 4 S e~ W tO CU tC' GG `t` 0.'~ CU ~ fD ttl } ~m Ri ~ D SD 4 Si w w J W Z 0 H Q H GC N Z Q H N ZZ ~ J a a ~ w ~ ~ ZN Z 3= ~ W W 0 ~~ c a I ! i 1 , ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ i .~ ~ ~ ~ I _ ~, ~ i t 1 ~ ~ 1 i 1 ~ r ; 1 ~ ~ } ~ I ~ 1 ~ ~ i !. I I I t O ~ f~ O n- tip ~ G ~ ,, ~' 1 ', I i I ~ 4-• 1 ~ Il i O :~ ~ i ~ ti^ _ _.. I ! c~ o . i i I- 1r-J v I 1 ~ I __- i 1 I a ( ~ I `' i cF, ~ I ~? ~ ~ ~ ty. n ,.o _ s - ~ . cv ~i s +~ ~ c`rt' _ o ~ o oa _ ~ '~ - ~ _ I f ~, 1 i i _ 4: ,., y I o " <` ~ _ - - cry ~ ~i m N ~ - ~~ ~ s i i N N ~ ~ ~ n. rr. ~ Q b c C ~ v . r ~ ~c6 47~ n ~ ,? w n yr `~ ~' ti ~ v a Qt t fE LK ~ f`7 lY ~ ~ U xu ~~~`.. O U c ~ ~ c n, 'c .i c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ... I ~ .. 1 ~IY ~ .. I N~ r`''7 1 ~~ N- w ~?1 L t' ~ 4i i~I 7 @ l~t 3 ~, c J) y ~ r7 ~1 C) .. ~ fa co F. G h- `f - r e ~ .~ <~ f3 f1. r LI = G ~ 4 V ~ r~ o Y ~ r G N s5 51 a ~ 3, ,'3 c'7 y ,y N o u ~ QY <5 l _ tV J !. ~ •U •fi 1 ~ ~ i ~ C y ~ ~ ai t ~ a LL. t' ~ W f i ~..J ~ .i r'cilt^I~r~ ~Q t- IC. t l~ !91 ~ I'C .. U S, tY = ~! Iii ~. ~ O QL `,:~ i~ of 1 ~ r!r c s Ir. NI ~.... J C?I~ r~ ^ c b ~~ C ~I ,i~ it .s. ~, (^ mJ io "Y ti r i`s '~ .. -; °i . Cr y v . N > C ., I 'C P C lV c O c •' m n5 x. C r; ~ m iy ~ . ~. C I'h C IC CIC ~ CIC N '~+ ,,>~ ~,• ~ C c.` o U ~a G v r' O ~J ~ ~ U c' G, c v I 1 ' c 1~.~ .:> > i c~ c~ !- v, ¢. _• z z , cn v; c. .~ i o r t7 , o !! ., zfzz zzzzzzlzcn<~.eF-rz a. r c~ r-, r.. ' tU rte.. N 0.'i n. [U t, ~:~ n ¢) > r•- f S:i `~ u, n. U! r-- .ti? f+ m n W n• OJ r Cfi ~-. a'l t~ 0.7 ~ ~ b r`~. 2` ¢, ,1', vfi CL W 07 ~ ~p ¢i CU ¢) ~> ,J:i ¢~ , '• <.P dl icn 41 ¢1 W o I O'1 CJ it c i~ i o CT o i9', i CJ i u ilia 1T .::~ 'r, l C~ I i1?I C? C:J C~, ~{) i". ~r 1_-,~~,lu ~ I " GJ I ; ~~i , iJ ~ ~n~ I C.S iz Z LL< LL • N Z DC a. N oc w Z 3 u Z C N Q H DG Q a N Z Q oe H Z Q J d w 1 N Z W w a O v i ~ ~ i I 1 I , 1 i I ~ i i l i ~ l i i ( e iii I i I J o . i ~ 1 ~ ~ j i ' I ~i I I ~ I I i ~ 1 ~ ~ . ~ ~~ ', , ~ - ~ i-- i >. r i 1 ~ ! fl i i? i j ~ ~ ! ~ ! _ _ i ~ __ ii __. ~ ~ ~ i I ~ i ~ } a ~ - i t-; ii - - i L ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ _ - ~ ..- r^~ r ~ r ~ ~- - - ,- ~ - }._. }....._~ 1. ._ s _i i I ~ I ~ ~ ii ) '1 r t~ ~ V- tU •- r{ tom. h CJ ~ LL') 'ct CG 'r.T +~ U` ~ 4ry 0.9 fV ~ y M ~~ (+~ T . ~ ':7 I c' , ~ I I 1 i ~ ~ I I ~ j M C'i U I i ~ 1 ! 'i i ~ ++~~ .0 ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ K _ .. ~ ^.J (C.1 T ») ~ V ~ ~ ? l5 w r: , O ~ Y 47 `V ~~ ~ (CAI .C C G ~ N ry y V ~i ~ ~ ~ 1 I `. ~ ~t ~ ~ ~ i I 1 i i h. i 'L I I ~ % .`~. rye N ` j T) i A ~] ~ JJ J M u tl, li ll U ` Cl 1 ~ s U v: J) i m Gf ~ ~ ~i 0 4+ to C 7 J C 'y ~'> ^.i : ~. ~ l J ~ g ¢ p ~ W U~ C c C C N s y' E Cl rG!11 C C ~ rl' C > ~ I ~ i ~I _ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~~, I r i ' ~ ~ I ~ ~t i ~ V ~J L ,~ - ' ~' C r C~ Z Q Tj (S t7 ~ H ~i 2 d H v 2 ~ F- o ~ 1 H ! Cn 2 ~V - F ~~ Z 1 - 1 Ci Z d - f ti 2 v - O ~ O C A W. }~ C fj u. L a Q E o 4 : pp O C x O r_ 7 C r 4 U L >. Y 1 'ri r' ro L ~~ O) r 1" ~ - q r1 L S py L - r I) y r -- i U) y c _+' W IS C; Ut !_) r .) Z ~ t <2 ~ ~ C? ~S y ~ i ' I ~ IY lY ~j I ' S N )~C ~V3i in (.' 1 i t m 3 to ~ ~ ~ o ] p 4 ry T} * i I ~ iZZ ~0`~.~c~~i~~..~~i^`~W ~: }S.t ~I~ ?IQ.. [ .. i ~L i i I . ~ J? ?~ r J: f T : T~ T - Ly 9? : ( , .^I 1 ~1Y ( ]Y T iJ': J5 JY : ri I I S, .:1? C~ C ri I 7? Sal tlY i N N O? SS I J A .J'. ~ ^~ (~. n4 :V C,11 ?fIQ: G. 6YI E 1,,-.~ ~ i 1 ~^•~C ,~.i,;,.1. 1~ r-~i-J in•~-~ ~n) :-i~-~ii`i ~~~'J: ~.~.. i liry ~r„~N N N :S'. i...::7>n-^. Icy. J:~v~,. I I } N ( ... `! 0 .~ Z w w J W Z ~_ H Q H a N Z Q cc zz ~ J a a ~ w w >_ Z N Z 3= ~ ,~ w 0 VV N t H Y V 7 L ~+ H .~ i• CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ~ ~ ~~: g ~ ~ 6 ~~ ;~ nom:; s a-r~ e,~ ~e;ee~ ~~ ~ k~E~ ~~ +~. ~ .. --~E {~~} -~ tom? ~ ~ ~-} E;~r3ttf~le~-~~ ~ r ~~ ~. -~ ~;; l1TL7 L`D CTAT'C DlIATC ~` ~Pf-n~i tjt ri.~r~ur~~ nr ~ ~ ~' l,'1: ,.1 ,. 4l, r Y }fie. r ,w_,.i ..F ,.,.~F~ee~a~~a~~s-~~s~~e e€~a~e~~~eees-~~~y--~e~et~e~-~°'-ase i....,... .._i ~. This Table Struck • II-62 F- . w J W Z ~_ •- Q H DC d Z Q H • N ZZ oc Q a a ~ w w ~ Z N Z 3 W 2 W W V ~V ~ ~ ~~. ~ ~N t0 ~ ~ l4 (T3 ~ ~ = v Ji v ' ~ © i Q. r3 ~C O . ~ ~ ~ U O ~ ~ O ~ O ~~ .~ ~ RS f- ~ ~ ~ o ~ .1^^r . U ~ = ~ Q N ry . t1D ~ .--. ~D O C c c G f' ~ '~ i:, " p > m ~ V) ~ = ""' EYl c ~ m ~ ~ Y ~ ~ Q ~ ~ O ..~ ~ ~1D iti ~ll .~ ~ :~ O ~ ~ `~ C~ ~ 4 a ~ io ~ ~ } o G] tU ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p C ~ ~ ~ ~ ;::. .U "d ~ N 4tf W -p ~ m m v 7~ 'O ~ ~ N ' Q ~ ~ ;~ p Cl 0 t8 ~ , N w O ~ -t: z~ C ~ tB ~ ~ fl 41 :n t4 ~~ O O its . o h CC Q O ~ N m a U y U c i > °F L ° m ~_zi ~ p ~ ~ Q+ I+ ° tl~ r.. .~ ~ E o rn zs ~ E ~ ~ ~ m ~ L f:.. ~ _ ~ ~ TJ ° ~ ~ '~ O! c N o ~D O B m r., CL ~a ro ~ t0 °' 1c w t8 o ~ ~ O ~ o t c c c a~ ~ ~ ~ t) ro ~ ~ in ~ in ~ ~ .~ ~ c~ ~ - ~ ~ ~n c v !-- :' m ~' sn a ~ ~ N ~ y a p d = '~ ~ 2 ~ = t4 c N c ~ _p ~ ~ -~ t ~ tD N W ~ N ~ ~ N ~ '~ p O Y7 V ~ ~ Z7 C ~ , C ~ ~ O en S1 a. !2 O ~ N Q- N > t4 t{S O > p t6 > p 't3 t0 'tJ II! p' CL t2 ¢~ ~ ~ tit O O a: m ~, ~ ~ ~ w ._. a_..._____~. _. J W _... _. _.-_ ... ........__~..,._. ._.. _ _-__ - ~ _ . Q ~ ~' "' ' ~' ? r , j ~ ~ e^a ,n ra s ~1 ~ !^. r~ ~,y ~ ,o ~ <s ra ~ '~ v-~ C3 t aiJ i ~i T+ 1°° pn M S ~ w _ l r,: f i ~ r .~ v, ~ -~ : `D N iti es .~ ~.` ~° "A' W ~ '~' ~ c/J ~ v 3 tl" h C3 t ~:~ C-i - Vh Ci ft f# ~ Q r•:., i{i ..: ~ i+n ^w/ ' N 'J v'i r ~. ry ••" v N ,r. r r,.a ~ .ra ,r f .,'t. ~ ~ n~ ? P r,c ry na t-~ u^~ h '^ .., ~'4 ._. '~' .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d ! _r.~. _ N ..,.._,.,...~~.a Z ~ Q ~"` ti ~i ~ O~ ..~i i ~~~ ^,.~'t Obi ~+~C~i Cam?. f'~h~~ _ _ =: "_ -' / . .r[ Z G'"' ~.y A 1 222 ~/; ~ .~'~ ~ rr rr: MME. M +.? <i' r+y M ~ V' *t ti^: .-. ..-~ .-, ~. .-. .-. -t -- -' .. ,.. .. , _ ... . ,. _ ,~: ~ w ~' r_t ~'~ " ~ _ . . .. ~~ [V ri r3 fa r-d rte: r`~ f~ rd c3 x^- , ~ L rr y i . ..-... _..._._.. .._......_. _~..._ 1 ~ L ~~ ..r ~ {era ^ _-..~_._- I~ _...... __~....,,.,...~~ s ~ ~ ~ ,~ -r ~r ,', v .r ,rte M ~i M !^~ M M ~= - _. . ; , ; -1. ` „~ ~ ~ . ".7 ~ ~ 'Y„ '.=. ~..~«...... .M.. ...~e........,. N //~~ /y~~y q W F+ H Z ~ ~I , "~' k C 'i !`., G., .G ~ .er ~ .. t/~ _-r7~ ^ _. r ~ ~ ,Z. • ~.:i ,~ ,J .-~ y ~ '~ ~ Cw `.!` ~~., ate.. ~ ~ ~ tt4if L:i '"~ ~ ~"i 'v' tw' r.` „~ LtJ ..7 W j. M ,..a ~ t,~ ::~E ^^' ' r-. fi f. E ~ i ~ _ ...,_.__ ___.. __.. _. _..,..~--~. -m.~ _ ~,..._... ~,~ ~_ ~ ~ O . _._.,,..,..~....-., ,~. .,.. U U .~ • • CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Fl.fiSi' FftGtTS6'AO'S Leve3 of S++rvice Lases Uivideil A B C D E Llndivide; 2,CtC ?,0u0 13,$UO 19,500 27;)00 4 Uividcd v:t,400 33,;00 4;,800 61,800 70,"I;0 5 D;csded 3u,S~)(F 44,5r?0 ?1,501+ 92,'70(1 !05.40! STA7F.'Tfi''O-~VAY AR1`FRIALS Class! (°x!10 to f. 99 signal ized intarsc~etienspermile) Lcsx1 of S ~ ce Lanes Divide! A I2 C A E 2 L'ndividwl •• 4,<OG 13,$00 1fi,a00 15,900 4 1)ividad 4,8GD 29,300 3x,7.!0 35SOU '•+ & Divided 7,300 44,?00 52,100 53~~00 •*« R Uividcd !1,400 58,000 45,100 57,N00 '•* Class 11(2.(0 fa 4.<0 signalized intersections permile) Lcvcl of Service Lanes Divided A Il C D E 2 [ndicided •• 2,400 17,2:h9 iS,aC«t} 15;_00 4 Uividcd x• 4,100 25,000 32,700 3a,SOf, 6 Divide.! «• 6,500 .'.Q 100 G "~0 51,8(}{i 3 Divided "* S,S00 ~3,3C!0 53,00 57,GOii Class lII (mote the; a.5 si#;Balized iatcrsec,iattspermi2e and tHJi within prinrary• city central bnsiaesa district of an ttrlsanized a.-cn oaer 7S O,OCd?) I REf;R'AY9 In:ercanxtge spacing'> 2 mi. spat level of Service Lanes A 8 t; D E 4 23,$00 39,500 55,200 57,100 74;5.34 6 35,400 52,!00 $S„3D0 IG3,500 125.3tiG 3 44,900 92,700 115„100 IA0,200 156,fi00 30 63,00) 10x,,'.00 IaS,S00 176,9(1(1 !96,400 12 35,40<'} 125,800 175.500 213,500 237,100 1nte7Clia'n$C 5a73Cing C 2 97. apart Lcve2 of <ervise La~ts:s A 13 C D E 9 22,000 36,OOP 52,r}00 5?,:OU %6 1110 5 34,$t)0 56,500 81,700 !05,800 :20,20 $ 47,500 77,000 C11,40{~ 144,306 153,401) t0 b0,20fl 97,500 141 ~Cf lb'2,500 207,5ir0 12 72,900 119,100 t'70~40 ;.21,100 251,20x) 11IC1'CT.E :~iC1DF (i`ata!: Level of serve iec f.7r tae bicycle. mode in :F: is tab#e is ba8sd tan macaw ay geomettics at ~C !rapt, posted xptxd s.nd ita:.r c cnnditiras, not number cf rtcyclisty usittg tht fauli:y.i (~laltiply mowiice3 v~rLicte rh)2unzes sfin'un laelau• by ztrmbcx of dizecaonal madwry tames w determine tuzr-µµy maximum service vo2nmes ) Yaved Shoulder! l.cvr3 of Senricr Hirycla i.ane I. eve'. of Set: ce Laces Uividcd A I3 C D E Coverage A B C U 1 2 lJndividcd •'+ " 3,3!X1 ':2,600 !5,500 0-49°; ** '* 3,200 13,8GG >13,800 4 Divided «" •* 2'2,x00 23,9(;0 32,860 ?6-$4". "* 2,500 4,100 >#,2G0 ««« b Uividcd «• +• 19,500 4x,700 49:300 fii 100°~m 3,200 7,200 >7,200 +•+ x«• $ Dividc+d ** •" 25,800 5$,7170 63„&00 P]:i71:S71tL'tu`i MODL Class TV (mere ihnr a.S signalized intersections permile and ait}tin (;dote: Level ofservi.-c f>z the pedesttia¢ mode in Otis table is baced ro madw•ay over 750A00) using rite facitity.J (Vlt:itiiily motorirod vehicle volumes s3owv helaw by number of lxvoi of Service directional roadway lar~ ti dsxermine two-way maximum service volumes.) l.ana:s t)ivid4d A B C D i; L.+el of Serviv~ Z lndiv-idcd •• •• 5,209 13,700 25,000 Sidewalk Coverage A D C U E a Divided x« «* 22,300 ?0,300 ?]?00 0-t9°e *« •• «x 6,a0G I!=00 6 Dividex2 .x «x I9,200 45,$00 47.5:'}0 50-&t;u r* xr +x 9,400 19;)01) $ Uividcd xx <• 25,tit}0 55.)00 62,200 $5-100°,~n •• 2,200 11,300 >I1,300 .«« aTl•: clew.) -. 3 , .~~. ... ~ ~ ti t>>~~t a e r u c a , _~. a Source: 1'6 , ..,.:~ c \...t':2• ~~" ~ 1" { T~-C=;A} 1.af-27.-iT[t.+, 2 t s..e: "1 :4 i ^ [i,.... ~....n. io* ~a~, dutg sro-3;rr-5aea1 ec.2~~i:;zea c =Gas tab b 3-.i";u iu httEs:l;wwwllm},:an~ia..;tay,Jar.n,ny;~}vu`rrs~smlox'alefauitLun obtain theequivaie¢tonadirection~lwlcntef~rana•wavfa~t7raies. •t.htf ads der,! nut M+tutimu a standard and should 6e use( ,anl~ tee getaat planntuH ~P11Ci:faPS. Tae Wap~sta mob W brad utricb:ls !ablau daivM sS~~i1 bz axed to m re rprcr5: F•n ddE +yy;tiata~nt.7:rs Iab~e mat der,v~, u+ixpusn nsu«;x srvdd :ur ine nsai `':r carrid.rs ur inlatecfim drerign, whse mute tefr>;e:l tech u2qut3 szht Vatuex tlmsr•n rare tw;-u~a~ aum.:i a~3rr,~e ku;y ~v;lu.:.et (t~aacd <w Nuo :tt.toul Ccr In•eta ufsuc:ce sad aan fa e:x sattanu:bi}utruci cedes unl,av stxaiLcxiip atamJ. l.evd of savke te:5er grate tLailn,i,k arepe.~:ueb'.yxs a.:ePa:aLie avos~ csade mrr, @:cr;we, emu nodal aanpaiwna shau:d t« rsaAn xen , •,vicm, },,,F,<.rraore, corohaicg lerels of semi; of ditfi:netR ¢Wav irate ens erns!! aredway level of asvicc is as rercu:am.,icd'ihe tu' ;e's i~ut vs7n.< detasu's and `n,,.<3 a7<emiu mtsssrywa ac. Ns EetEowug Pape Cdu:lationa arebas•1 rn pfamvog appucatexa of she &gkw-a7 t`i m'+h' (Nzau~, B:gcee C.aS r,ladnl. FairaLiai I.OS licdel ~d Tvuait laltciC-:ty as:d l2<atiry cf Se^,avz Maned, rrsPe~µv-„y Tuc the bff!~cb;WRUr.1 biede. ;~eJesarian an~9 bus mech. "(case! bs anrirvd nfing arable; aput va{ur akfsnits. •"eNce aFpti-ak.la ter: h~u feud ;i mrvice :Utex gsa,ie Pee avtonwbue'Kwk aolcv, vvl~„mv. gzsa;a :k~a laud d'senue t) two ¢s P insuc :atmxssoa capacities yxvn boon s¢s.3ca[. Pa baycn and pvdestrim pains, Se }r.d of :m:ce Satyr gsacc (i:w:oiisg } j s pat ackisval>,q boeaua than is as a,exnnem oeh;us mhne a<imckniA s;Mng trkb :ap•xt vatec dsfm;ee. S:!' • ~ ~ ~ II-65 w w J W Z O Q O a N Z Q • 'N V Z Z ~ J a. ~ N W W ~_ ZN Z 3W ~o ~~ r' S -- ~ ~ G u~, w u c:. i+. u, ~ V Q q a CJ v W G~ ~ C.• : J C _ x. nr, .-. .t '~. Q ~ K ~~ r ~ ~ 3 ''~'' ~ .'4, r ?'S ai .'_5 r f ~ ~ i ^t ~ -t J . " ~ ~_ r r w t= ~ ,~ r r-- ~ c ~ i r- r~- _ _ _ tc -y ~, .a .a d .a y! _t ~ ~ Q ~' .a ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~' ~ .. ~ ~ - - - - ~ t- ~ H Q ~ y`r h- kn{ t~ ~ H ~* ~. . s .~ t~ -r -r -t -t -r ri -r r . ~ ~ r ,-t ~ w a _ ? Gr7 .-7 > -t ~ a _ ~ 4 ~ Z ... 7. '.', ? ~, ~ r,1 uWW' ~ ~ 2 ~I Llt . a ~ LLi j .'l. ~ T /y ~ i ,,,,J Ly. G l U J Y; ~ ~ J ^ lY y a ~- _ ~... ~ C.. .`J., ~ ~ ~ W a ~ s. r ..~ ,~ ,3 ," i, c '~ .., Y4~ .0 `O f- w w J W Z O Q O a Z Q oc ZZ ~ J a a N ~ w Z N `\ Z ~ W F-- Q V V r A ~' ~ ~ ". ~. 7 J J yen'. ~. 1` r ' i / - r OL F J ~ F ...1 C7: H ~ Rte' F Li1 0.~ F u.l R ~ 4j ~' ~ !:.~ IX ~ W r' C(. ~ iG F- .. ~"~ c:, [a ~ O v ~, ` v r' v .~ ~i ~ ~ ~ st ~ ~ . ~ ~ Q .''a fA u ~ CA w ` ~', a :> .~ m U i ~~ 4... a -~, x ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ Y w ~ z r., ~ G ' ~ G ~-' ~ GJ Z 1 . O ~ ~ . -! x ~ ~ ~. - r. r ~; ~~ ~ cn ~ z w ~ ~ ~. x ~ ~' g~ ~ 4, r 'r .C .. a ,n ~ r. ' ' r rx ~: ~ r a cu ~ r ~ ~ i c4 yw F+ r a ~: ~ i ct yw 'r r a w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . i r ~ C` r^ n u h- ~ W ~ ''.! .'' 7 ~ ^~ U ' ' ce m ry ? W a ? 2. ~ .'' r. - '[ ,~ % ~.: YY ~t i~L ~ CY eG ~ ) . i 7_ 7 ~. ~~ =i :%. ,• i , h Y i^ ~.•.'~. ~O z W s~ W J W Z ~_ F- Q O a N Z ~Q/~/ VL • N _Z Z ~ J a a N W F- , Z N Z 3= W W 0 ~~ t ~_ ~• V V 4..' tW ;;- ~ ~ "! ~ ~ ^ 't -- C f' 1 -t rte, -t ~(,• V ... i _ ! _- _ _ _ L =.: ° ~ x x ut x x V .-1 _ Z V ~ ~J w ~ V "! ~ _ • ~ ~ ~ s P ~~ ~~ r, ., ~. ~ , I- a~ u ~ z = ~'7 K :ul .y .y. y G _^ ~ ;'~ ~ ! - a r r i i „r z -, , y k ~ _ _ si :~. v. :.J ~ :r. OC r CM1s' z ~ a a ~ ~ r f: f `; w ~ .- w w a z ui m ui ..~ w _ F:, r~ x ~ ~ ~ Chi N ~ ? ~ ~ W ~ ~ b v2k ~"riw:%. wF~ wttn~:y :: T °r ::~ 4: .« .,7 ~~~ 1 _~ :~ t~ f~ :T~ ~ x .~ CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT • • State -District Five Funded Projects 1. SR 434 from US 17-92 to SR 419 - Improve the traffic control devices.~system. (City and State Joint Project} 2. SR 426 -Four-lane from Mi#chell Hammock. Road to Pine Street. (Design} State -Metroplan 'Orlando 2025 Lang Range Transportation Plan (Source: Table 5-2; Summary Report, Technical Report No. 5) 1. SR 425 from Pine Street to S.R. 434 -Widen to 4 lanes. 2. US 17-92 from Shepard Road to Lake 1~1ary i3a~alevard -Widen to 6 lanes. 3. Aestheticltraffic improvement project on SR 434 from U.S. 17-92 to SR 419. {Under Construction) 4. Resurface U.S. 17-92 from Shepard Road to Airport 131vd. (Bids 20062007} tDoes not add capacity.) 5. Skid hazard overlay of SR 419 from SR 434 to U.S. 17-92. (Bids 200512006) (Does not add capacity.) 6. Grant i osfi Read Under ~ County - F°t L ' S 1. L~k~ ~ a County -Met ~ able 5.2; Summary Rep a e r u c Seriino Co__ only -Metroplan C3riando 2025 Long Range Transportation Pian Unfunded Critica{ Needs (Source: Table 5-2; Summary Report, Technical Report No. 5y 1. Red Bug Lake Raad from SR 435 to Eagle Circle -Widen to 6 lanes. II-69 • • • CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 2. Latest datr: basQd on need 3. 2025 Lang Ranee Transportation F'le~n Roadway Segment Improvement Programmed' Planned 3 S.R. 434 US '17-J2 to SR 41J Traffic Control 200~`200F I Lake C+rive Serninola Boulevard to Add 2 Lanes 2002-20015 Ttrskawilla Road Red Bur# Luke SR 43#3 to eagle Circle Widen to 6 2000-2005 Rd Lanes Serninola Bfvd. tJ5 '17-92 try Lake Drive 4'Viden try 0 ?0 l5' Lanes f 1.5. '17-Q2 Shepard Road to Lake Add 2 Lanes Design 2000;2007 201Q`1 P.9t~ry Baulevar-d ~ Ri~~'4'-2005-20t1~r ;~ R 4 . :, L L S R .. ^ `~R 4_;, SR 4~~ _ ~~ ~v 10` a e ruc 1. Contairrk_~_f „ II-70 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT • (:oUn improve Lake ©riwe from t~vo (2j lanes to four (4} lanes from Tuskaw~illa to Seminole. (Under designy {Bids 20{75) State" improve U.S. 17-92 from Shepard to Lake lVtary Boulevard from four {4y lanes to six (6) lanes. t;Under environmental revieti^ry • 2. Improve SR 419 front SR 434 to U.S. 17-92 from fivo {2y lanes to four {4) lanes. Nate: This project is not funded or planned by the State. NOTE: It appears that the Gity should start lobbying for improvements to SR 419 as current counts equal and/or exceed the existing roadtivay capacity. See also Table 15A for additional information. This Table Struck • ., II-71 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Mate -District Five Funded Projects 3 '=R 434 from US 17-92 to SR 419 - lrnprot=e the traffic cantro{ devices!system. (City and v ;~~' .'~h+ - ~Ci~~-{c3"~' s'"ol'1 f'JI','tC'~ell {-i3!?^i'Ylor~~ F~oad to Pine Street. (Design} State -Metroplan Orlando 2025 Lang Range Transportation Ptah (Source: Table 5.2; Sumrnat~y Report, Technical Report Na. 5j ~+ ~> fot°~~ ~iM~ ~,tt~ee~ to ~.g 4~4 -'~";~iden tc -+ laces. US 17-92 from Shepard Road to Lake hoary Boulevard -Widen to 6 lanes. u ~~estheticrtraffic improvement project on SR 434 from U.S. 17-92 to SR 419. Under C onstructionj Resurface U.S. 17-92 from Shepard Road to Airport Blvd. (Bids 2aQ6l2t}47j Does not add capacity. j _ Skid hazard r~~deria~Y of ;~R =+1~ from :~R :~~w tc~ ~.~. 1?-92. tEids LOC~a~~O~~? :;noes r.a` add capacit~~.; _ Grar:< tUr°~rer I Gounty - F°! 2 ~, f ah~ ~ ~a. aunty-Met a e ruc ~~#~ ~-~; Summary Rep Ser~iinola Bo~~ie~;~ard f~~o~~ US '17-9~ to L:~ke Ur~~~~~ -!~';.'~:deo to 6 lanes. County -Metroplan Orlando 2025 Lang Range Transportation Plan Unfunded Critical tweeds ~Saurce: Table 5-2; Summary Report, Technical Report Na. 5j Red 6L~g Lake Road fro«~ SR x;39 to ~ag(e Cxrc(e -Widen to 6 lanes. ., • II-72 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Phase I Improve Panama Road from Moss Road to Edgemon Avenue. (Completed) ~: Ir~w ~a~ies R~oac; n:~rti~ of 6al-~ar~a Road to ~xist!ng paving on Hayes. tCornpleted) Ir~~:~rrove "~~~1ra~s Ro:~d °ror ~ P~~nas-na Raac~ rrarti~ to existing paving on Moss Road. Completed) Replace Hayes Road bridge. (Completed} Replace C~."~~os~ R:~ad i.r~cige iCarnpletecf'~ Phase it i Paving and drainage improvements to Bahama Road from Shore Road to Hayes Road. 2. Paving and drainage improvements to Panama Road from Shore Road to Moss Road. iCompieted) :' Paving and drainage mpraver~ents to Fisher Raad from Panama Road to Cit}J Limits. :Ca~~~ti. ^ Phase ill i Upgrac; nes.' ~r,ta. Re~~~ire ,~,,. a ruc ,I~trM 3. Constrlsct Ta~:~~~n Center collector read to accommodate ne~,,,,, development. Roads will connect SR 43~ and T~aska~-~:~Ila Road far collection of traffic from this area. (;Completed. P,oads nc!~~de T"us~ka.~:,i!~a Road. Doran Dr!~.~e and B!~imberg 51~~d. ~e~ree~-E~;`~~:~3t~~~~ee~a~-ter-., i ..i...,....... ~r,r~~ II-73 • • CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT i __ U_ ~ ~ * ~ z w ~ f, •N~ ^ w „~ J _ tj _ 1.. - ~ ~ .K - ~ L: _~ ,: I _ ~.' 3i i Z ~ ~._i. a ruc J, ~~ ~I *~ ~, ,~ .~ _ J O 0 ~^ ~~ ~j W LL 1:1 ',. * r v ~ \' y ~a ~•~N ~ * IN 4RU <~ ~~ a~~ r. * F c~ to U41S ,a oti :~a ~~ aas~~d~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ t ~ N Y W LLI ^ ~ '` ~ ~ Y /- t J I N Q Q J ~ ~ J 1)' 11 r J~~ \N ~ \N l7 ('1 / V~ ~ IL 7 (~~ 1 ~ `~~ , st a ; ~ ~ as scow 4.. '\_, ~ Btvo \~j c, ~•~ 7 d SHE vp~ ~ /'` a ~'J 1 N ( ~ ~ . ` J~ Jl ~.. ~ ;.1 N31MM `ay~ J~ ~P~• r, ~, JJ ~'s-r, ~~f i'~ . , , _ . i s scale; NONE 2004 EXISTING ROADWAY CLASSIFICATIONS ~ ~~} i, ~~,1. ~ ,r,,,,,. ~r,l~,::i-~±-tors AND NUMBER OF LANE5 FIGURE tar ~ i r. 2 „I.htm~ng~e. ~~. Job No.: 'N64r2Q r, ., -,; r, , „ ,~, CITY OF WIN'iF.'.'R SPRINGS '' _ ;, I~,R"" t'"'~°°"~'~3,r~*''-°~"„- TRANSPORTATION STUDY -REV-SED 2-2005 ?~:T' • II-74 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT • • II-75 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT • City of Winter Springs • L~ Map 11-3: Existing and Future Public Transit System; Major Traffic Q,enerators FUTURE TRAFFIC GENERATOR PUBLIC TRANSIT ROUTE ~ N MAJOR ROADS ;ref STREETS N CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY MAJOR TRAFFIC GENERATOR ~ 4VATER FEATURES Map re for Qraphic representatlon purposes orty; ac4,at data X81 be vMf1e0 by CatY atafs. Q 1 0 - 1 Mibs ~~~~ N ' j: \:vu Ururr+ ~nno~nrtoMs ,aa cb.,<,,., rt,«w. s,,,.. ns w~..~.. Pvrx fre..re St7d" 'td! -115 1275 II-76 1 • • • CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT J ~ ~Y~f: '..j !rt ~ ~ag~ ~ 6 ,a... 3 ~ *c. } ~. ~_ ~, °( - ` ~~~ o d !~ t ~:. ;~ C ~ !"l Sc,.,rsye. r_ar,:s t~sepn rra+arar~rrs. InC ~Y a ~. h4arch 200. '~:~~ l1-4s Ekisiifti~ mid Propose '~ Ciic}~~€le ~:gc.ilitiM.g Cite :3 SrRtEN,,i.E Teti e_ I'rapase4 ~'[xigtrrp CITY 4f 4JMNfEtn SPRtt~1GS ~4Rl.N^:ICIPHI Eif?t)NO?.RY j 4`1'~iFRFEATt1R~S' / t r"~~ ` -tee _ 41,~j --•.i ~:A~,1! ~ (4Y (~.tlfrr'!~ f€e~`d'Y~(e!uU'i'iF ~~~~~~t'4r~.le:.F.t~; 3atunl ;.pia ~~~st tn' rar:t~a4 u~ i:d7 sWt!. i ~ ~ ~. .~ 1 ~a s~; v ~~,•niwan'.~t II-77 V~ City c-i Wittt+~r'.s'prin • • • CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ,> _ !_ t.:i ^ I~ a ruc ~_ ~_~_ j, I,.r f..~. ~ ~ ~- ~__ ~ ... z ~ ~ a~ ~ ,..~`' ~ a~ ~ ,~ ~ _ ~ i 11! 6 Ii0 4 CC? _ t ~ li ~ ~ ~ >~ U ~ ,, - - i ~ _~;, ~ m '~~r'"'~- _ e ~~ ~ Q e _ .`. ~ ~ r~ -_- _-~ °P W "C ' _ q L'; U ~ LL u> C? sa b t ~`. P $ ~ D = w } _ r -- ~; ~ "~~f ,~ c i r. , 5il r'. _ ` t '.'C). 3 ~~ `, Sal©; NONE ~~~~ zooa -ri~AFFic zoN~s ~-;U~R~ n~aRhiac~a+ pas: 2-19.70t1S ....~ a •„ , ~~ ,,,,.~,~,~„~ ~ h NO.; Yv`Lti3124 CITY f3F WINTER SPRINGS _, - ,,.c,.,a-r;~,,:,, TRAMS€:>C)f27A1'IC)NSTUDY-42k~VISEC)2-~X(){;5 wa~;22 II-78 i• i• CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ^ '~ a ruc _ U -4,i '- Q t7 ~ \_ i - ~ rr t s i p Z~ x < Y ~ ~ L C ... ~ 37db7 4 u s ~ ~ -. ~ ~ ~ 1. ~ !- bb7a u: > > r. bQ £7N3:12J ~ ,~ o rr l >. %~~ L i Z r , ~ \_J ~1 Q~ Lr J ¢ ,, f° tol ,.. `~ ~~ _ w aLL x oy ~~ c f ~ ~ ~ ~ ` b~~~ c rr c 5~ ~ LL a ~bNSrrl o -, ti `_: ~ \:: 'K .k ~•-~ ~, F7SN~. C12i :3yOH~~ (; ,~ } C. r_Z `rz' K C1 i ~~ ~ (Y ONS3AVH~`~ ~`~ O LL u O~ Y '~-% c c- x ~`-~ g n ¢ l0~ pl J m ~~ -~ c (~ ~ c R. 'it'd J,. G~ ~ []H S504"7 u: j L: a ~ G~ vo, ~ ~ ci -~ ~,,~~ S~ ~ SHf O~ `p: be `U~ W Ol e 3NVlTJ39VV41 -S~'6• ~ /1'~ Q p' ~~ Z ~~ s 0v ( ~1 ~Q l l ~~ Zb~lr r~ r < Scale: NONE ~;.,.v 2004 EXISTING DEFICIENCIES AND LOS FIGURE r ~ , r .n, t.,b,'r:n. Date; 6-1Fr2U0S r ...., w, r•, .: ~u~ .... r Jol; t`;;.. W; 3194 3A ;, ., , ,.. ,.•. , . ~°~„~,:. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS ' • •• TRANSPORTATION STUDY -REVISED 2-2005 ~+,~~~ 20 II-79 • i• CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT ^ I~ .~, a ru c ~, , 3. a i ~~_, ~ I ¢. jjj~~ ~* ~~ ~_ ni r rn:":"-. K ~ ' 1. ~ .~• ~" 3-} ~! ;'! ' ~K ~' K a Tai ~ ~ R ..2 std, ~ ~ ,sl ~J ~• ~ •f~i 3-e~rtl.U^ ~ ~ ~ J t) ~ tt ~ +,w r~1 ~ .~, ~ ~{' 7 ~ ~ sy ~~ ~> i ~:' ,n G.. .a~I i• c. w •°«~«* 3y1=~CtE~ IfviPROVEMEIVT~ R..dyk~ FiCk.1~.E '. as3.mmPr l.uSs:~,u ircSit.:~s.a ..137; r: t•lbL'JJ~ n.suarp7al .i .n.~, A I °, x...,, ,s t his.; 'sa~t.17 fd CITY QF'NI'11TCR uaRINCzS r ~. , ~'"' rw :`tt' ^ ~ •••u•-+:~ TRr~.V a~RTATI~3N yTU[]M - ~Fb'ISFC) : -:~.~C::S II-80 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS • • COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT .' City of Winter Springs • '~ i. ". ~;~ _ ~ i - • ~ ~ -- - '' i ~ ,,.. ~~ s+ Source: CpH Engineers, Inc. erW land, Design Innovations, Inc., SepWnDar 2001 eotual date trMAt W vwtfiad by City st~l. --- ---._ ._ . - -- e.___.._._ __ .,..._........_~ Map 11-5: Year 2010 Transportation Plan I ~ STREETS FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION: ~ ~ 0 1 Mies ((~~~ --_ CROS6 SEMINOLE TRAIL t.lmiurd Aocass N NUMBER OF LANES: ~~ I ~ j ~~,!, (~ru+. ~~tw~~:~t9u4+. N 2 --~- +~stlai i ~ ~1Jt ~~o a~.we a..,~,. s~,+. rn s N, ~ WATER FEATURES ~ ~ ns-r n ~~~ xm N6 II-81