HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010 02 22 Public Hearing 501 Aesthetic Review Park Manor Academy Daycare Facility CITY COMMISSION
AGENDA
Consent
Informational
ITEM 501 Public Hearing X
Regular
February 22, 2010
Meeting
gr. / Der"
Authorization
REQUEST: The Community Development Department presents to the City Commission an
aesthetic review request for an approximately 3,500 square foot (SF) daycare facility within the
R -3 (Multiple Family Dwelling) zoning district.
SYNOPSIS: In 2008 the Park Manor Academy received a conditional use to construct and
operate a daycare facility at lot 5 of the Excelsior Business Park (135 Excelsior Parkway) and
subsequently received a building setback waiver to "fit" the facility onto the site. The 0.49 acre
site at the east end of the privately owned cul -de -sac is presently vacant. An aesthetic review of
the building, site, wall, and signage is required before building plans may be submitted or a
building permit issued. The site plan is being heard at the same meeting as this aesthetic review.
CONSIDERATIONS:
FUTURE LAND USE & ZONING DESIGNATION:
Future Land Use Designation: Medium Density Residential (3.6 — 9.0 D.U. /acre)
Zoning District: R -3 Multiple Family Dwelling District
APPLICABLE CODE:
Chapter 9 of City Code
Chapter 20 of City Code
CHRONOLOGY:
January 11, 1990 — Excelsior Business Park plat was recorded with Excelsior Parkway as a
private cul -de -sac roadway.
July 9, 2007 — Ordinance No. 2007 -20 was adopted, allowing day nurseries, kindergartens, and
daycare as a conditional use in the R -3 zoning district.
February 25, 2008 — Conditional use for daycare was approved.
September 19, 2008 — City receives site plan application package.
February 22, 2010
PH Item 501
Page 2
October 27, 2008 — Setback waiver (allows 15' front setback, in lieu of 25') was approved.
February 3, 2010 — Final engineering /site plan received recommendation for approval from P &Z.
DISCUSSION:
The 0.493 acre undeveloped site is located on the south side of the east end of the Excelsior
Parkway private right -of -way, adjacent to a storm -water pond (master planned to accommodate
Excelsior Park).
The submittal requirements for aesthetic review are set forth in Section 9 -605 and include the
following: (a) a site plan; (b) elevations illustrating all sides of structures facing public streets or
spaces; (c) illustrations of all walls, fences, and other accessory structures and the indication of
height and their associated materials; (d) elevation of proposed exterior permanent signs or other
constructed elements other than habitable space, if any; (e) illustrations of materials, texture, and
colors to be used on all buildings, accessory structures, exterior signs; and (f) other architectural
and engineering data as may be required. The procedures for review and approval are set forth
in Section 9 -603.
The City Commission may approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove the application only
after consideration of whether the following criteria have been satisfied:
(1) The plans and specifications of the proposed project indicate that the setting, landscaping,
proportions, materials, colors, textures, scale, unity, balance, rhythm, contrast, and simplicity are
coordinated in a harmonious manner relevant to the particular proposal, surrounding area and
cultural character of the community.
The proposed single story building is to be constructed of concrete block covered primarily
with stucco. It has a brown colored architectural grade asphalt shingle roof, a prominent
expression line and water table. Staff believes it will fit into the surrounding area
harmoniously.
(2) The plans for the proposed project are in harmony with any future development which has
been formally approved by the City within the surrounding area.
No other more recent site plans have been submitted in this immediate area. The proposed
project represents a very positive addition to the surrounding area.
(3) The plans for the proposed project are not excessively similar or dissimilar to any other
building, structure or sign which is either fully constructed, permitted but not fully constructed,
or included on the same permit application, and facing upon the same or intersecting street within
five hundred (500) feet of the proposed site, with respect to one or more of the following features
of exterior design and appearance:
(A)Front or side elevations,
(B)Size and arrangement of elevation facing the street, including reverse arrangement,
(C)Other significant features of design such as, but not limited to: materials, roof line,
hardscape improvements, and height or design elements.
February 22, 2010
PH Item 501
Page 3
The proposed buildings do not appear excessively similar or dissimilar to the other
structures in the immediate area.
(4) The plans for the proposed project are in harmony with, or significantly enhance, the
established character of other buildings, structures or signs in the surrounding area with respect
to architectural specifications and design features deemed significant based upon commonly
accepted architectural principles of the local community.
There are no other buildings or structures of the same type in the immediate area, although
the structure is compatible with the nearby attached and detached residential structures, as
well as the non - residential structures along Excelsior Parkway.
(5) The proposed project is consistent and compatible with the intent and purpose of this Article,
the Comprehensive Plan for Winter Springs, design criteria adopted by the city (e.g. Towne
Center guidelines, SR 434 design specifications) and other applicable federal state or local laws.
The Park Manor Academy is consistent and compatible with the intent and purpose of the
Comprehensive Plan and other applicable regulations.
(6) The proposed project has incorporated significant architectural enhancements such as
concrete masonry units with stucco, marble, termite - resistant wood, wrought iron, brick, columns
and piers, porches, arches, fountains, planting areas, display windows, and other distinctive
design detailing and promoting the character of the community.
The project has incorporated a number of these features in an appropriate and tasteful manner.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Seminole County Property Appraiser's office states that, within Seminole County, the
average building size for a daycare center is 5,528 S.F. (this facility will be approximately 3,500
S.F.) and that the average just value of these facilities is $110.70 per square foot. Therefore.
without knowing further specifics, the estimated total just value of the facility is $387,450 (3500
SF x $110.70). The applicant projects 3 full -time and 2 part-time employees. Tax revenue
projections are as follows:
3,500 square feet - assessed at $110.70 /square foot: $387,450 assessed tax value
$387,450/1000 = 387.45
387.45 (2.5814) = $1,000.16
$1,000.16 (less the 4% statutory discount) = $960.16 tax revenue
COMMUNICATION EFFORTS:
Neighboring properties within 150 feet of the site were notified in writing and signs were placed
at the site for both the conditional use and the building setback waiver. No further efforts have
been made for the aesthetic review, beyond those routinely done by the City Clerk's office.
Further notification is required if the applicant seeks a waiver from the wall requirement (to
extend the vinyl fence along the adjacent residential property).
February 22, 2010
PH Item 501
Page 4
RECOMMENDATION:
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Commission approve the aesthetic review plans.
ATTACHMENTS:
A Location Map
B Aesthetic Review Package
• ' ATTACHMENT A • '
1 0151
'
. 112 '
37
H ro v 1 kb jyha
T -0b, 4qr ' 2J, y JA
t�•!rc ri - �i_� J Aj
J 2 i: J -tvs �` .. -- �dy��.` * n 7 388
11 r ay,, »i ,: ' f: -� 2w ` a � y
J / )1rDly 4004020440 � 6408.410
,;ar . ' } si b H, & ' ?p, 4 /24 14 5 00
•
502
7 310 44 t r oy,,: 2.0 u' 2a mb r :.- /-*? ..... 1 ; ' 1
G ..i7.,-.2 50
y �22i ��yd 2 ao ti 6
9 ; : .4 Jb ro167 5
2 . 63 •. , .1 - si : Jae :mi. 233 226'. _ 82 'i —1 •
lo- - • - •2r,T r. 4 ,' 311 G Jig JJo • - - , 1 ■ 229 ' ' 230 ,
S A 1rJ.r' 2 �<��: rr Otj . 1 " . 7 231 i 224 , 127 219 214 •
0 r 2.i • - • � � � V Z .. 33/7 Roma 229
, ; ' 2 21 225 ° 228 227 212
F T . J1J s ,, !,! JIe j 227 ; 226
✓� - i• .. .:; zr ,.. A , 2 ' 223 225 22
- fi r ms r � f Q r j 32un< 215 218 221 - 224 223 218 a :4,,.;...,.
J" LI �� �� Sv Jv .mrt 223 r 11 i �a T A , it p� >si g .., 1 t 216 , J 2 19 220 121 ► y� �1 W a v � l rJa, ? 221 1 14 �T 217 u . Cog 234 1 o 4 , 219 ' - 218 v �,� ,J2J u�.22 1 212 21 212
- agp9 i o 2 iryy 117 r 215 216
N . ' ' 'Jr
f14Jas I ! 11 2 7/ 210
ass JJJ s`. J 3/ J 3/; 215 11 1
r ' /A 6.4%v " A ti�i2 J i N ^ J Jl J t 3 J{ 2 [. . 2 ., 38 207 a 21 ! 111 206
"2 _1— 1 I'r 0 � ® � r '° j2 ! J `'.t $q R9a � ; 109 lJ J 106 209 20(a
CF` 1 � ' � �`_ i O • y h � L y�'$�' � • b 1 04 , 2 203 208 ... 07 20
P° 0 n! �s'O 28 �� ; 15 .' b JrJ 4b ., 107 f `
U , , J CR 0 ' ii' s 1.-1.33'.: 310 'i n 1 201 206 10S 21'
Wt .. A y � y ' � 86 yyjyp ,i110/. . `+r �� 105 100 20 • QQq
d ; "11 130 �aJ ,i1,..0,1 ysy; ' 5. -� J ':' r 203 ` 4 ` 09 41 ; .. -' j 107 IOS 104. 3 201 : U
D w ° > ' ` 4d,d 4,44, : ts y y sl :2201 40 t - ►
202 .-
135 irdy° 41/13 1 �.� 410 , .103 428
o � ^` k'°b s>b �' ��. < � ., '408 � 8 101 S
0. e 1 / �' 1 3 9 500
,. -- ,.:_ � � S � j 114 •
0 Y} ,t . .. 426 �
��1 � � `� , = 2 y � 110 1':: 411414
A ��":, � 1 _ 106 411 418A20 , 5
^ � �`I / " . . 7 . - `% I
D ° 4 � c ` ! [ W ......3 ... W W r 100 4 057. .1' .! 412 914 4 161 � .4124426':".4'.28
416 428 385
C 01 S q . roam c ■ 9' 7-. .1.: 410 2 "-
Z 4 y 1 14 402 404 4164/8 420 - 0 1 / • ', 43
► �V� 10 4410412 ,.
6
406 .,-
�. a�� �' 2 404 O
B /so 181 . P � �R . 0 ..
110 SALES � . s„ ' X67
�`� TRAILER =" 365
186 2 ., 6 9
OAD 43
4
59 73 61 ,11'', 71 " a 71 70 * •
E STAT R - _ • p
.
74
A — 1 n�� 201 n 98� (�� -1� 3 i 207 "206. Pg 242 S8 ' 75' 86 87 88
1 • 2Continue • Pg 242 - 4 t � � - J 5 • iontinu � A 8
w. EP„Im . 1 Mi E ` NOTES:
•
4 it '. • - .,.: ;. -. _? ` L :. : i, t --... E r 1 = Municipal Address Map Book ° 20° " 4
ji 0 .. t „. \� PRINTED: REVISED Feet
�F F' 1 = J 2007 2 s
,� ' a 2415
� >. City of Winter Springs, F P age
PAGE LOCATION KEY MAP WITH 1 IL 2 MILE RADIUS RINGS Developed By. Southeastern Surveying d Mapping Corp.
V Continued P'2415 V V 1r Continued P72415C
• " `'./YS <? `O , ci , 279,27 V
4 l l
ZOJ; 1pr •v0 1 1 grJ0 ' i f 4, r,
■ 1 LI C ; 2 , 'IJ ' 311
S AT 0 ` 1r� ? 0 9 z l � rz� 1-2.e H rr
Gq , 44j,
0 : � .� r9 ' / L
► d r
r _ 1
�.1r ., 5 6'f I ', bp
d -9 ": J ∎ .2 0.c PO0 % rn TA
0 0. ti �� ' LIFT �� 3.
. STA. 1. i\ It 1
4 ' / • 7 W ia� �ii�
Q r, ) ^ N ;' ,� . 331
F <,si\'' v� .. _ ' ti ` : 325 331 . �� ti 5'4.11,1: 302 300 ' \ ,� '* b 3 27,' 329 ` ` 33
■ ti ' 1 ' 306 304
335
°°
100 4 /,/ V N. 4 l �F
q
xcF 1 3 � ��z23 1
°
/702 t9/ :288 3 11 ' 15 ,. 3 9 3 23 3333,. �3 3y
S6' 9 p
3 194 1
t] �\ 130 31 32 331 .33131
5
111 33 9,
9 3p5 33 , 14 FG
0 7 3
110. ' ' N j 3 �1 S+ 3�33
1.`b �� 3 qH N
� 135 3 a 63 3 �` M /G(� b to
C f. : , � ` ^ � �b,`,, 3 ti ' I 3 3 �
• '�, 33 0.' g
3A 3 t A b
■ gA �� g 3 Q., 5
w
Lk) � tv�wti+�ac
A '011.00, O\O �`-' --- ---
- ` r
I
Continued Pg 2415 4 • 5 • C :Pg 2415 • 8
1 • 2 • 3 •
W - EPARD RO ' . x--) NOTES:
41 t
: s; - 11T4 : ,a, 0 , • s; - -- . E R
,..,„
•
: , ?is- R 34 it Y • I` ARL R
� Municipal Address Map Book ° 100 Z0D
C NI . r'�- l : 1 _- I . PRINTED: REVI SED: Feet
• „A 1�. �'` Apr 2005 2 : 3
:� �� +�_ :� City of Winter Springs, FL 1Pa 2415A ■
PAGE LOCATION KEY MAP WITH 1 & 2 MILE RADIUS RINGS Developed By: Southeastern Surveying d: Mapping Corp.
■ ■■ ■■ ": l S11■ S111
I m Flooll Full an 2
----------
-V ....... - - R.-
- f SEE! - .1 S. - RE - RER RE'
-- -- ----- -------- ..................
31-0- RE-
1 7'-8 3/4"
40 00, 17' - 3/4" 40 00,
10' 7 1/2"
0' -7 1/2"
0' -0"
0
0
0
0
CC 0
F C 0
D FF
FF—] FT
F F
I �0
CD
0 a
000000
000000
0
a
A BUILDING ELEVATIONS
m PARK MANOR ACADEMY AMERICAN CIVIL
ENGINEERING CO.
N WIMER SPRINGS, FLORIDA xo t +%I "onou ru ivn oexsa a vm