Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999 10 11 Regular Item E COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM E Consent Informational Public Hearing Regular X October 11, 1999 Meeting It: ,/. - ~ . , t. -~- Mgr. 1 Dept. Authorization REQUEST: Deputy Mayor Cindy Gennell requests the Commission review the attached draft of Commission policies, as discussed at the July 13, 1999 City Commission Workshop. PURPOSE: The purpose of this Agenda Item is for the City Commission to review the attached draft of Commission policies, and make any changes or corrections prior to adoption of a Resolution at the October 5, 1999 Regular Meeting. CONSIDERATIONS: On July 13, 1999, the City Commission held a Workshop to discuss City Commission Meeting procedures. A draft of the consensus of Commission has been attached so that the Commission can review and make any necessary changes or corrections. A Resolution contalmng the agreed upon City Commission Meeting procedures will be presented to the Commission at the October 25, 1999 Regular Meeting. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS REGULAR AGENDA - OCTOBER II, 1999 REGULAR AGENDA ITEM E PAGE 2 OF 2 FUNDING: None Required. ST AFF RECOMMENDATION: ATTACHMENTS: A. Memorandum from Deputy Mayor Cindy Gennell containing the results of the July 13, 1999 City Commission Workshop on Commission Meeting Procedures. B. The Minutes of the July 13, 1999 City Commission Workshop. C. The "Ranking Motions Chart" found in "Parliamentary Procedure Basics for Governmental Bodies" (Third Edition, Agenda Associates). COMMISSION ACTION: ATTACHMENT "A" MEMO October 1, 1999 TO: Andrea FROM: Commissioner Gennell Attached is a draft of Commission Policies as discussed at the ConU11ission Workshop on July 13, 1999. This needs to be presented to the Commission at the next regular meeting for their consideration and comment, then placed into resolution format for the following meeting. Would you please see that it is placed on the agenda for the October 11, 1999 Commission Meeting. Please include a copy of the minutes of that workshop with each agenda item, as well as a copy of the chat1 referenced in item number 10. Thank you very much. DIAPf RESULTS OF COMMISSION WORKSHOP ON POLICIES AND PROCEDURES JULY 13, 1999 1. The Commission shall hold Workshop Meetings, 5:00 to 6:30 PM, prior to each Commission Meeting for a trial period oftwo months, beginning to be re-evaluated at the end of that time. 2. Agenda packets shall be made available to Commissioners no later than Wednesday prior to the Commission Meeting. 3. Roberts Rules of Order shall be the "underlying foundation" for the conduct of Conunission Meetings. 4. Any Conmlissioner may request that a Consent Agenda Item be held for separate consideration. 5. No Motion shall be recognized by the Chair until all Commissioners and the City Manager have had an opportunity to address that Agenda Item. 6. Motions, once made and seconded, belong to the Commission, not the individual making the original motion. (Amendments need not be approved by maker of motion) 7. All motions shall be considered in accordance with the Ranking Order Chart in the "Parliamentary Procedure Basics for Governmental Bodies"(Third Edition, Agenda Associates) 8. There shall be no limit as to the amount of time a Commissioner may speak. 9. Motions to "Call the Question" shall require a second and a vote. 10. The Mayor shall strongly enforce the directives of the Commission relative to disruptive members of the audience and time limits on Public Input. 11. (This was touched upon during discussion) Members of the Commission may call the Mayor's attention to disruptive behavior by members of the audience, if the Mayor fails to notice the behavior. In such event, the Mayor shall issue a warning to those individuals. 12. Disruptive members of the audience shall be given I or 2 warnings (yet to be determined) by the chair. If these individuals commit further disruptions the Police Chief shall escort them out of the Commission Chamber. 13. Commission Meetings shall be adjourned by 11 :00 P. M., however, they may be extended in one-hour increments by a super majority vote. 14. Regardless of the time, Adjournment shall require a motion, second and a super majority vote. ATTACHMENT "B" CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS MINUTES CITY COMMISSION WORKSHOP JULY 13, 1999 I. CALL TO ORDER The Workshop of the City Commission was called to order by Deputy Mayor Cindy Gennell in the Commission Chambers of the Municipal Building (City Hall, 1126 East State Road 434, Winter Springs, Florida 32708). Roll Call Mayor Paul P. Partyka, absent Deputy Mayor Cindy Gennell, present Commissioner Robert S. Miller, present Commissioner Michael S. Blake, arrived at 6:31 p.m. Commissioner Edward Martinez, Jr., present Commissioner David W. McLeod, present City Manager Ronald W. McLemore, present Law Firm of Frank Kruppenbacher, P.A., Attorney Robert Guthrie, absent Interim City Clerk Andrea Lorenzo-Luaces, present Commissioner Michael S. Blake arrived at 6:31 p.m. II. AGENDA A. Commission Meeting Procedures The discussion began with each Commissioner stating what issues they were particularly concerned about. Deputy Mayor Gennell compiled all the concerns into a list to be discussed and a poll would then be taken. Those issues included: .:. Using "Robert's Rules of Order" or "Parliamentary Procedure Basics for Governmental Bodies" (Third Edition, Agenda Associates): . as the guide for the meeting procedure. . To whom the Motion "belongs" after it has been made. . In conjunction with the previous issue, does an amendment to the Motion have to be approved by the maker ofthe Motion? . Ranking order of Motions. . Limiting the time a Commissioner can speak on an Agenda Item. . Strengthening Public Input rules, specifically when many people want to speak on the same Agenda Item. . Adjournment procedures, including if the meeting can be adjourned without a motion and vote from the Commission. . Assuring each Commissioner and the City Manager have spoken before the Chair recognizes the Motion. CITY OF WINTER SPRlNGS MINUTES CITY COMMISSION WORKSHOP - JULY 13, 1999 Page 2 of 5 · How to deal with disruptive persons at a meeting. . If modifying the Agendas would be effective in shortening meetings. . How often meetings are held and the length of these meetings. .:. A poll was taken regarding whether the Commission wanted to keep "Robert's Rules of Order" as a reference tool or if they wished to adopt another parliamentary procedure tool. The consensus was to use the basics of "Robert's Rules of Order". There was continued discussion regarding "Robert's Rules of Order"; the length of time Commissioners could speak on a subject; having more Agenda Items under the Consent Agenda as opposed to the Regular Agenda; and meeting with the City Manager on an individual basis prior to the meeting to ask questions. Mr. Ronald W. McLemore, City Manager spoke to the Commission about Consent Agenda Items; Public Hearing Agenda Items taking up most of a meeting; and the numerous Public Hearing Agenda Items as a result of the City's growth. The Commission suggested that Agenda Items be listed on the Agenda In order of priority. Tape I1Side 8 There was continued discussion regarding meeting with the City Manager and Staff prior to the Regular Meetings; the Chair being responsible for limiting "Public Input" when too many people wish to say the same thing; and what other communities' meeting procedures are. Deputy Mayor Gennell called for a five (5) minute break. Deputy Mayor Gennell reconvened the meeting. .:. The Commission was asked if they would prefer to hold the Regular Meetings weekly; begin the meetings earlier; have an open "pre-meeting" prior to beginning the Regular Meeting to discuss the Agenda and ask questions; or leave the meeting schedule as it is now. They were also asked if they would like to limit the overall time of Public Input during the Regular Meeting. The majority of the Commission agreed to holding a Pre-Meeting from 5:00 p.m. to 6:30 p.m., without Public Input, for a trial period of four (4) to five (5) meetings. They also agreed not to limit the overall Public Input time, however the Chair must strongly enforce the "three (3) minute rule". .:. Manager McLemore suggested he would research several other Communities to learn how they succeeded in shortening their meetings and then return to the Commission with that information before the issue is formally decided. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS MINUTES CITY COMMISSION WORKSHOP - JULY 13. 1999 Page 3 of 5 .:. A poll was taken regarding when the Commission would like to receive their Agenda Packets and if they would accept Add-On Agenda Items. The Commission agreed that they would like to receive the Agenda Packets no later than the Wednesday prior to the meeting and that Add-On Agenda Items will be allowed, only if "critical". .:. The Commission next took a consensus about how to handle disruptive persons. Two Commissioners were in favor of the Chair issuing two warnings and then requesting that the Police Chief escort the person from the Chambers. Two other Commissioners were in favor of the above with the exception of issuing only one warnmg. Tape 2/Side A .:. Since there was not a majority agreement, Deputy Mayor Gennell concluded by saying that they hoped that their directives would be enforced "more strongly", in hopes of alleviating any problems. It was suggested that if the problem still existed, this matter could be re-addressed. .:. The Commission, by consensus, again discussed "Robert's Rules of Order" and whether the Commission wished to "set up our own rules" but retain "Robert's Rules of Order" as a "underlying foundation"; keep it in "strict form"; or to "start over". The majority of the Commission wished to retain "Robert's Rules of Order" as an underlying foundation. .:. When asked whom a Motion "belongs to" once it has been made and seconded, the Commission agreed by consensus that the Commission as a whole would "own" the Motion, as opposed to the "Maker ofthe Motion". .:. In conjunction with the previous consensus, the Commission was asked "If the Motion is owned by the body, then I'm assuming that the Maker of the Motion has no privilege over which amendments attach to the motion and which ones don't, is that correct"? The majority of the Commission agreed. .:. The Commission next took a poll as to whether there should be a time limit for a Commissioner speaking on an Agenda Item, and if so, how much time would they be allowed. The majority agreement of the Commission was that there would not be a time limit for the Commissioners to speak. The Commission briefly discussed holding another meeting to consider these procedures, and after four (4) Regular Meetings they would assess the changes. .:. On the subject of adjournment, a consensus was taken regarding should there be a specific time to adjourn meetings. The Commission unanimously agreed that there should be a specific time. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS MINUTES CITY COMMISSION WORKSHOP - JULY 13. 1999 Page 4 of 5 .:. The majority of the Commission agreed to make 11 :00 P.M. the adjournment time, however, all Commissioners agreed that the meeting may only be extended with a supermajority vote. .:. On the issue of whether or not they wish to include a specific time to extend the meeting, the Commission decided that the meeting would be extended in one (1) hour increments. The Commission further discussed procedures for adjournment, and if majority or supermajority votes should be required for Motions to extend the meeting and Motions to adjourn. .:. A poll was taken about requiring a Motion, second, and vote to adjourn a meeting, even if a vote to extend has not taken place at 11 :00 p.m. The Commission unanimously agreed. .:. The Commission was in agreement that a supermajority vote would be required for Motions to extend the meeting and Motions to adjourn the meeting. Commissioner Edward Martinez, Jr., departed. .:. The Commission discussed "calling the question" during a Motion; and the Commission was in agreement that the current procedure should remain. .:. The Commission decided to adopt the "Ranking Order Chart" in the "Parliamentary Procedure Basics for Governmental Bodies"(Third Edition, Agenda Associates). .:. It was agreed that the Chair will only recognize a Motion once all Commissioners, and the City Manger, have had the opportunity to speak on that Agenda Item. .:. The Commission decided that any individual Commissioner can separate a Consent Agenda Item to be discussed and/or voted on separately. Deputy Mayor Gennell directed the Interim City Clerk to transcribe the minutes so that the consensus that was taken will be easily identifiable. There was discussion regarding the consensus being documented in the form of a Resolution, and in such a form that amendments could also be made. Manager McLemore was directed to develop a draft Resolution and bring it back to the Commission. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS MINUTES CITY COMMISSION WORKSHOP - JULY 13, 1999 Page 5 of 5 III. ADJOURNMENT Deputy Mayor Gennell adjourned the Workshop. Minutes Respectfully Submitted by: Amy R. Lovingfoss, Interim Assistant City Clerk City of Winter Springs [lJ~ 1L - 1L ~~ r ~ .1- ~ ill 4s r iiiiiiiiIIIi r I r -. ATTACHMENT "c" - ... ............ ................. .................. ................ ........................'....... .........,..................,.. ..... .. ......... ............... .......... ....... .;.:-;.:.:.;.;.;.:.:.:.:.;-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.::::: .... .. :...::......::.:.:-;-:.;<.:.:.:.:.:.:.............. ,,}i::,!!l?i@~~:~!~~~iiii~i!j!~~~~I,......,' ......... ....... ................. .:.:.;':';':';':';':~'~':':':':-. ...........-..... ................ . ................... . ...........,.... ................. ';.iiIi Privile ed Motions 13 Fix time to which to ad'oum" Yes No Yes Yes No No Ma" No I I I Yes No Yes Ma" No No No No -*--- No No No No -*--- No 12 To ad'oum 11 To take a recess 10 9 Call for orders of the da 5 b "d" M f U Sl lary o Ions 8 Lay on Table Yes No No Maj No 7 Previous Question Yes No No 2/3 Yes 6 Limit or Extend Limits of Debate Yes No Yes 2/3 Yes 5 Postpone Definitely Yes Yes Yes Maj Yes 4 Commit or Refer Yes Yes. Yes Maj Yes. 3 Amend Yes Yes Yes Maj Yes' 2 Postpone Indefinitely Yes Yes No Maj Yes* Main Motion IGJI Main Motion I Yes I Yes I Yes I Maj I Yes II *Consult Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised for special rules. 20 _..~_._-'~-. - ~ ._.~, . ._--~..-