HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999 09 27 Regular Item G
COMMISSION AGENDA
ITEM G
Consent
Informational
Public Hearing
Regular X
September 27. 1999
Meeting
MGRLEPT
Authorization
REQUEST: The City Manager requests direction from the City Commission whether the
City should continue to object to the proposed Joint Planning Agreement
between the City of Oviedo and Seminole County.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this Board item is seek direction from the Commission as a
result of a proposed Joint Planning Agreement between Oviedo and the county
that affects the City of Winter Springs interests.
APPLICABLE LAW & PUBLIC POLICY:
The City has expressed an interest in annexation in the past (ref. 8-14-95 City
Commission meeting), [which includes areas sought by Oviedo in the proposed Joint
Planning Agreement ].
CONSIDERA nONS:
. The City of Oviedo held a Local Planning Agency meeting on September 16,
1999 to consider a proposed Joint Planning Agreement between Oviedo and the
county. In the Agreement, there is a map that shows Oviedo aligning its
annexation area to include the area east of Battle Ridge to DeLeon Street. A
review of the map clearly shows a configuration that is a clear attempt to
prevent Winter Springs for annexing eastward to DeLeon Street. Also Oviedo
has the area south of Red Bug Lake Road and west of the beltway in their
annexation area. Both the county and Oviedo have been aware for some time
SEPTEMBER 27,1999
REGULAR AGENDA ITEM 1 G
Page 2
that Winter Springs wants this area in its annexation area in a its Joint Planning
Area Agreement with the county.
. Thomas Grimms at the request of the City Manager read a letter at the Oviedo
Local Planning Agency meeting on September 16th indicating that the City
Commission of Winter Springs on numerous occasions has expressed its concern
that a Joint Planning Agreement between a municipality and the county, which
among other things provides for annexation boundaries established without the
involvement of all adjacent jurisdictions affected by the proposed boundary
violates the spirit and intent of the Intergovernmental Coordination Element
requirement of the Growth Management Act [163.3177(h) Florida Statutes]
and 9J-5.015 Florida Administrative Code.
. The City Commission of Oviedo at its September 20th meeting, voted to approve
the Joint Planning Agreement with the county.
. The Joint Planning Agreement is scheduled to be heard by the County
Commission at its September 28th meeting.
FUNDING:
N/A
RECOMMENDATION:
The staff recommends that the City Commission direct staff to file an objection with the
County Commission at its September 28th meeting based on the following:
. That the City of Oviedo has reversed itself on its claim that it had no interest in
annexation northward of S.R. 434 and eastward of Battle Ridge through the
following actions: (1) outlining an area east of Battle Ridge to be in its area offuture
annexation; (2) by the City Manager of Oviedo extending invitations to property
owners east of Battle Ridge to annex into the City of Oviedo. Two meetings were
held by Gene Williford, City Manager of Oviedo, on September 9, 1999 and
September 14, 1999.
. That the City of Oviedo has refused to adopt a similar policy statement that the City
of Winter Springs has been willing to adopt which would preclude either city from
annexing eastward ofBattl~ Ridge and northward of Florida Avenue.
. That the City of Oviedo has refused to enter into a Joint Planning Agreement
involving Winter Springs, Oviedo and the county.
SEPTEMBER 27, 1999
REGULAR AGENDA ITEM G
Page 3
ATTACHMENT:
A. Letter to Chairperson of the Board of County Commissioners, dated September 27,
1999 from Ron McLemore.
B. Letter to Chairperson of the Local Planning Agency of the City of Oviedo from Ron
McLemore, dated September 16, 1999.
C. Proposed Joint Planning Agreement between the City of Oviedo and Seminole
County.
COMMISSION ACTION:
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
Ronald W. McLemore
City Manager
1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708-2799
Telephone (407) 327-1800
September 27, 1999
Chairperson
Board of County Commissioners
Seminole County
Dear Chairperson and Members of the County Commission:
Consistent with previous policy established by the Winter Springs City Commission, the
City of Winter Springs requests to enter into the record of the proceedings of the County
Commission of Seminole County's meeting of September 28, 1999 its opposition to the
proposed Joint Planning Agreement for the following reasons:
· The City Commission on numerous occasions has expressed its concern that a
Joint Planning Agreement between a municipality and the county which among
other things provides for annexation boundaries established without the
involvement of all adjacent jurisdictions affected by the proposed boundary
violates the spirit and intent of the Intergovernmental Coordination Element
requirement of the Growth Management Act [ 163 .3177(h) Florida Statutes] and
9J-5.015 Florida Administrative Code.
· The City of Oviedo and Seminole County have chosen not to involve the City of
Winter Springs in the process of development oftms proposed Joint Planning
Agreement. Indeed, at a meeting of the City Commission of Winter Springs in
1998, The Commission and City Manager invited the City Commission of
Oviedo (the Chairman of the City Commission of Oviedo was present at the
meeting) to develop a Joint Planning Agreement involving all three (3)
jurisdictions i.e. Seminole county, Winter Springs, and Oviedo. The City
Commission of Oviedo refused to enter into a three party Joint Planning
Agreement.
· The proposed Agreement is inconsistent with the provisions of Oviedo's
Comprehensive Plan which provides the following policies relative to joint
participation and cooperation in comprehensive planning as expressed in the
following provisions of Oviedo's Comprehensive Plan:
The City of Oviedo Comprehensive Plan in Objective 7-1.3 states "To avoid
litigation and resolve conflicts with local governments and regulatory agencies
through mediation and prevention."
Policy 7-1.3.2 supports the objective in stating "The City (Oviedo) shall address
impacts and conflicts in the following manner:
a) The City Staff shall first meet with the staff of the affecting
government agency."
The City of Oviedo Comprehensive Plan in Policy 7-1.3.3 states "The city agrees
to participate in a mediation process if other governments or jurisdictions object
to Oviedo's actions."
On behalf of the City Commission of Winter Springs, I request that the Board of County
Commissioners not sign the Joint Planning Agreement until such time that all three (3)
jurisdictions affected by the Joint Planning Agreement cooperatively work toward a
process and development of a Joint Planning Agreement that considers the impacts upon
and interests of all three (3) jurisdictions. Good planning as envisioned by the Local
Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act (Chapter
163 F.S.) will be realized with the participation of all three (3) jurisdictions.
Sincerely,
Cc: Ron McLemore, City Manager
Seminole County File
Read File
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
Ronald W. McLemore
City Manager
1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708-2799
Telephone (407) 327-1800
September 16, 1999
Chairperson
Local Planning Agency
City of Oviedo
Dear Chairperson and Members of the LP A:
Consistent with previous policy established by the Winter Springs City Commission, the
City of Winter Springs requests to enter into the record of the proceedings of the City of
Oviedo Local Planning Agency's meeting of September 16, 1999 its opposition to the
proposed Joint Planning Agreement for the following reasons:
· The City Commission on numerous occasions has expressed its concern that a
Joint Planning Agreement between a municipality and the county which among
other things provides for annexation boundaries established without the
involvement of all adjacent jurisdictions affected by the proposed boundary
violates the spirit and intent of the Intergovernmental Coordination Element
requirement of the Growth Management Act [ 163.3177(h) Florida Statutes] and
9J-5.015 Florida Administrative Code.
· The City of Oviedo and Seminole County have chosen not to involve the City of
Winter Springs in the process of development of this proposed Joint Planning
Agreement. Indeed, at a meeting of the City Commission of Winter Springs in
1998, The Commission and City Manager invited the City Commission of
Oviedo (the Chairman of the City Commission of Oviedo was present at the
meeting) to develop a Joint Planning Agreement involving all three (3)
jurisdictions i.e. Seminole County, Winter Springs, and Oviedo. The City
Commission of Oviedo refused to enter into a three party Joint Planning
Agreement.
*
The proposed Agreement is inconsistent with the provisions of Oviedo's
Comprehensive Plan which provides the following policies relative to joint
participation and cooperation in comprehensive planning as expressed in the
following provisions of Oviedo's Comprehensive Plan:
The City of Oviedo Comprehensive Plan in Objective 7-1.3 states" To avoid
litigation and resolve conflicts with local governments and regulatory agencies
through mediation and prevention."
Policy 7-1.3.2 supports the objective in stating "The City (Oviedo) shall address
impacts and conflicts in the following manner:
a) The City Staff shall first meet with the staff of the affecting
government agency."
The City of Oviedo Comprehensive Plan in Policy 7-1.3.3 states "The city agrees
to participate in a mediation process if other governments or jurisdictions object
to Oviedo's actions."
On behalf of the City Commission of Winter Springs, I request that the Local Planning
Agency recommend to the City Commission of Oviedo that all three (3) jurisdiction
affected by a Joint Planning Agreement cooperatively work toward a process and
development of a Joint Planning Agreement that considers the impacts upon and interests
of all three (3) jurisdictions. Good planning as envisioned by the Local Government
Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act ( Chapter 163 F.S.) will
be realized with the participation of all three (3) jurisdictions.
Sincerely,
&L~~
City Manager I
TO:
LAND PLANNING AGENCY
. .
FROM:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
.~
DATE:
September 16, 1999
SUBJECT:
JOINT PLANNING INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
A joint planning interlocal agreement with Seminole County to provide for
intergovernment coordination in the comprehens"ive planning process.
PROCEDURE:
Quasi - Legislati ve/Quasi -Judicial Proceeding
A. Staff
B. Public Comments
For Speak
Against Speak
C. LP A Motion & Discussion
D. LPA Action
RECOMMENDATION:
Motion to recommend approval and execution of a joint planning
interlocal agreement with Seminole County.
EXPLANATION: Staff recommends approval. The Land Planning Agency is asked to
consider ajoint planning interlocal agreement with Seminole County to
enhance intergovernmental coordination and cooperation in the
comprehensive planning process.
The state mandated comprehensive planning process requires
intergovernmental coordination of local comprehensive planning processes
and allows municipalities and counties to enter into interlocal agreements
to achieve such intergovernmental coordination. Chapter 163 of Florida
Statutes provides the framework for such agreements and the requirements
for intergovernmental coordination in the comprehensive planning
process. Chapter 187 of Florida Statutes, the State Comprehensive Plan,
encourages greater cooperation between, among, and within all levels of
Florida governnlent through the use of appropriate interlocal agreements
and mutual participation for mutual benefit.
The Land Use and Intergovernmental Coordination Elements of City's
Comprehensive Plan require the adoption of a joint planning agreement
with Seminole County to define urban service areas, determine mutually
acceptable land use designations, protect natural resources, and address
matters of common impact and interest. The proposed joint planning
interlocal agreement has been developed to satisfy the requirements of the
City's Comprehensive Plan. It is consistent with the provisions of Chapter
163 and Chapter 187 of Florida Statutes and the requirements of the City's
and Seminole County's Comprehensive Plans. Therefore, Staff
recommends adoption of the proposed agreement.
Land Plalming Agency memorandum
September 16, 1999
Page 2
.~
With the advertisement published in the Orlando Sentinel on Thursday,
September 9, 1999, all notrce requirements have been satisfied.
CONCURRENCY:
N/A
PROGRAM IMP ACT:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
ALTERNATIVES:
Recommend Approval with Changes, Recommend Denial, Table
SUBMITTED BY:
ANNING & ZONING
. ~
~
EXHIBIT I
Joint Planning Interlocal Agreement with Seminole County
. - ..
CITY OF OVIEDO/SEMINOLE COUNTY
JOINT PLANNING INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
THIS
JOINT
PLANNING
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT ,
hereinafter
referred to as the "Agreement," - is made and entered into this
day of
, 1999, by and between SEMINOLE COUNTY,
a political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose address is
Seminole County Services Building,
1101 East First Street,
Sanford, Florida 32771, hereinafter referred. to as the "COUNTY,"
and the CITY OF OVIEDO, a municipal corporation whose address is
400 Alexandria Boulevard, Oviedo, Florida 32765, hereinafter
referred to as the IICITY.II
WHEREAS,
it
is
beneficial
to
the
public
for
local
governments to work together in a spirit of harmony and
cooperation; and
~ ~ ~
WHEREAS,
the
provisions
of
the
Local
Government
Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act (Part
II, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes) and the Rules of Florida
Department of Community Affairs (in particular Rule 9J-S.01S,
Florida Administrative
Code)
provide
for
intergovernmental
coordination in the comprehensive planning process; and
WHEREAS, the provisions of this Agreement are consistent
with
the
State
Comprehensive
Plan
(Chapter
187,
Florida
Statutes), the Strategic Regional Policy Plan adopted by the East
Central Florida Regional Planning Council, the comprehensive
plans of the COUNTY and CITY, the Seminole County Home Rule
Charter, the CITY 's. Charter, Chapters 125, 163, 166, and 171,
,
Florida Statutes, and other applicable laws; and
WHEREAS, the parties have the lawful right and power to
enter into this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the parties recognize that joint planning for the
growth' and development of their respective jurisdictions with
regard to all matters of common impact and interest is consistent
with State law and serves the public interest; and
WHEREAS, the COUNTY and the CITY desire to protect the
health, safety and welfare of the citizens of their respective
jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, land use matters which are the subj ect of this
lI.greement
include,
but
are
not
limited
to,
annexations,
comprehensive plan amendments, public service facility expansions
and contractions, school site land acquisitions and proposed
school construction and/or expansion on said sites, and all other
land use actions of whatsoever type or nature which may affect or
impact the parties to this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the COUNTY and the CITY agree that joint planning
agreements addressing multi-jurisdictional land use issues and
provision of public services and facilities, are a sound planning
goal that serve to further intergovernmental coordination and
that additional agreements between the parties are highly
desirable; and
2
\
WHEREAS, Chapter 171, F16'rida Statutes, provides for the
~
lawful means whereby municipal corporations may expand by
annexation or contract their munic~pal boundaries; and
WHEREAS, the COUNTY and the CITY do not desire, and believe
that it would not be in the best interests of the citizens of
Seminole County, to allow for conflicts to become manifest or
develop pertaining to the CITY's jurisdictional boundaries; and
WHEREAS, the COUNTY and the CITY have determined that it is
in the best interests of the citizens of the COUNTY and the CITY
that this Interlocal Agreement be entered into; and
WHEREAS,
the COUNTY and the CITY have reviewed their
respective future land use designations and land development
regulations for consistency with one ~another's comprehensive
plans; and
WHEREAS, the COUNTY and the CITY have adopted comprehensive
plans, pursuant to Part II, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, which
contain goals, policies and objectives that call for the creation
of interlocal agreements which deal with annexations, services
delivery, joint land use planning, and conflict resolution, among
other things;
NOW, THEREFORE, In consideration of the premises, the mutual
covenants, and agreements and promlses contained herein and other
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which lS hereby acknowledged by the parties, the parties do
hereby covenant and agree as follows:
J
SECTION 1.
RECITALS.
The foregoing recitals are true and
~
correct and form a material part of this Agreement upon which the
parties have relied.
SECTION 2. PURPOSES OF AGREEMENT/JOINT PLANNING AREA.
(a) The purposes of this Agreement are to:
(1) Provide for joint land use planning.
(2) Develop planning and land use principles and
goals, policies and objectives relative to land use planning in
areas of Seminole County that are impacted by the actions of both
the COUNTY and the CITY or which are of concern to the COUNTY
and/or the CITY.
(3) Protect the general rural character of the Rural
Areas of Seminole County as depicted i,n the Seminole County
Comprehensive Plan, as it may be amended, by establishing limits
for and conditions relating to future annexations by the CITY.
(4) Provide for mutually agreeable future land use
designations that will ensure land use compatibility between the
COUNTY and the CITY..
(5) Provide each party with a level of confidence that
their respective planning efforts will be implemented in a
harmonious manner and that the planning efforts of a party will
not detract from the planning efforts of the other party.
(6) Promote continued intergovernmental coordination
and cooperation between the COUNTY and the CITY.
(7) Reduce conflicts relative to land use matters and
resol ve any disputes that may arlse In accordance wi th agreed
upon procedures and State law.
<I
"
(8) Provide for constructive cqllaboration during the
course of each jurisdiction making land use decisions.
(9) Articulate planning principles which landowners
.'
-
can evaluate to determine the reasonable use of their properties
and, thereby, have their private property rights protected in
accordance with law..
(b) It is the intent of the parties to work together in a
spirit of collaboration, harmony and coordination in any and all
matters relating to land use actions and decisions.
(c) For the purpose of this Agreement, the "Joint Planning
Area" means the area reflected in Exhibit "A" to this Agreement
which Exhibit is incorporated herein by this reference thereto as
if fully set forth herein verbatim.
SECTION 3. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AND FUTURE LAND USES.
(a)
Future Land Use Equivalency.
Exhibit "B", attached
hereto and entitled' "Future Land Use Equivalency Chart", sets
forth equivalent future land use plan map designations with
related intensities and densities between the respective CITY and
COUNTY comprehensive plans. Said. Exhibit 1S incorporated herein
by this reference thereto as if fully set forth herein verbatim.
The Future Land Use Equivalency Chart shall provide the basis for
review by the COUNTY and the CITY of future land use element
consistency and compatibility determinations with regard to the
respective future land use plan elements of the CITY and the
COUNTY. Particular reference is made to lands adj acent to the
jurisdictional limits of the CITY and the COUNTY and to lands
that may be annexed by the CITY. Actions relating to parcels of
5
land annexed into the CITY or. developed in the unincorporated
~
area which develop to an equivalent land use designation shall
not be opposed by the CITY or COUNTY based upon the compatibility
of land use type, density or intensity. The Future Land Use
Equivalency Chart may be amended from time to time as agreed by
both parties.
(b) Future Comprehensive Plan Amendments.
Exhibit "C"/ attached hereto and incorporated herein by
this reference, and entitled "Areas for Future Comprehensive Plan
Amendments" / identifies and defines the Transition Areas within
the CITY'S future Annexation Area. Comprehensive plan amendments
proposed by the CITY relating to properties located within a
Transition Area must be consistent with the existing and
established criteria as set forth in the CITY I S Comprehensive
Plan to amend to urban/rural boundary and, at a minimum, each
such proposed amendment
shall
include,
an assessment
and
evaluation of all required planning elements including / but not
limited to:
(1) Public services and facilities (e.g., water, sewer,
roads, public safety, law enforcement, library services, etc.)
(2) The evaluation of current supply of vacant land already
designated for the proposed land use category.
(3) Fiscal impacts related to the cost of and payment for
urbanization.
(c) Intent to Cooperate. It is the intent of the parties to
work
together in a
spirit of
collaboration,
harmony
and
G
. .,
coordination in any and all matters relating to land use actions
~
and decisions.
(d)
Joint Review of Comprehensive Plan Amendments.
During
the development,
drafting and consideration phases of the
respective comprehensive plans or plan amendments of the COUNTY
and t.he CITY, the staffs of the COUNTY and CITY shall transmit
respective draft planning documents to the other party's planning
staff
as part of
the public participation processes and
intergovernmental coordination mechanisms.
Each staff shall
compare each other's plan or plan amendments to determine whether
the
proposed land uses
and policies are
consistent
and
equivalent.
(e) Land Use and Zoning Designation for Parcels Annexed
~ ~ ~
into the CITY. Upon annexation of COUNTY lands into the CITY,
said lands shall retain the zoning classification assigned to
them by the COUNTY in accordance with and by operation of State
law. The CITY shall amend its comprehensive plan to include
annexed lands during its plan amendment cycle immediately
following such annexation. Plan amendments and/or rezonings that
are not consistent or compatible shall undergo full joint
COUNTY/CITY review.
SECTION 4. WATER, SEWER AND REUSE PROVISIONS.
(a) The CITY
and COUNTY shall continue to collaborate to provide logical,
functional, and cost effective central water and sewer services
to appropriate areas as. evidenced by the following interlocal
agreements between the parties: "City of Oviedo and Seminole
7
.,
County Wholesale Water and. Wastewater Service Agreement" dated
~
June 11, 1996; and "City of Oviedo and Seminole County vlholesale
Sewer Service Agreement" dated December 11, 1990 and amended
April 29, 1992. Exhibit "E" att.ached hereto and incorporated
herein by this reference and entitled Existing and Future Water
Service Area and Exhibit "F" attached hereto and incorporated
herein by this refere~ce thereto and entitled Existing and Future
Sanitary Sewer Service Area, identify the agreed upon service
areas for existing and future water and sanitary sewer service
within the joint planning area.
Each time a parcel of property
is annexed by the CITY consistent with the Annexation Boundary
described and established in Exhibit "D", which is attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference thereto, and the
, ,
property is not being served by the COUN't'Y., the CITY may add the
anne~ed property into its water and sewer service area.
(b) The parties agree to pursue a multi-jurisdictional
approach to the use of reuse waters.
Exhibit "G", which lS
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference,
describes and established the CITY's Reuse Zone.
SECTION 5. FIRST RESPONSE AGREEMENT.
(a) The parties recognize the fact that the COUNTY, In
conjunction with. the University of Central Florida and Orange
County, is constructing Fire Station Number 65 on property owned
by the University, but located within the jurisdictional limits
of the COUNTY, and that the construction of Fire Station Number
65 will significantly enhance the public safety and related
servlces available to t.he fire protection area served by the
8
COUNTY
and
proximate
to
the
city
Limits of
~
the
CITY.
Upon
completion of the construction of Fire Station Number 65 and the
said Station having been operational for a period of s~x (6)
months, the CITY agrees to evaluate in good faith the feasibility
of entering into a first response agreement with the COUNTY and
file a copy of the report with the COUNTY which report shall be
accomplished in a reasonable period of time.
(b) In recognition of additional development within the
Chuluota area which is currently served by Station #43, the City
and County will enter into a cooperative effort to plan for
services in those areas that surround the City limits.
SECTION 6. ANNEXATION CRITERIA.
(a) For the purposes of this Agreement the "Future Oviedo
Annexation Area," means the area reflected in Exhibit "D" to this
: ~ ~
Agreement which Exhibit is incorporated herein by this reference
thereto as if fully set forth herein verbatim; provided that the
CITY and the COUNTY shall continue in its efforts to protect the
area known in the COUNTY as the "Black Hammock Area" which
efforts are indicated and have been implemented by the actions of
the CITY and the COUNTY in the implementation of planning goals,
policies and objectives which protect the integrity of this rural
area and discourage urban sprawl into the Black Hammock Area.
(b) The CITY shall amend its Comprehensive Plan at the next
available opportunity to be consistent with the annexation
criteria and boundary set forth in Exhibit "D".
(c) The parties agree that substantial contiguity will be
the primary criteria for annexation of lands within the "Future
9
\
Oviedo Annexation Area" into t.lte CITY as otherwise provided by
,
State law. wi thin this area the COUNTY agrees, to the extent
permitted by law, not to oppose the annexation of any parcel that
is contiguous.
(d) The CITY agrees that the future land use designations
assigned to properties that are annexed into the CITY must be
consistent
with
the
provisions
of
the
Seminole
County
Comprehensive Plan.
SECTION 7. CONFLICT RESOLUTION. The agreement entitled
"Intergovernmental Agreement of Mediation and Intergovernmental
Coordination," dated January 24, 1995 shall control as to any
disputes between the parties.
SECTION 8. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. The parties agree that they
will not take any action that creates or carries a conflict of
interest under the provisions of Part III, Chapter 112, Florida
Statutes.
SECTION 9. TERM. This Agreement shall be In effect for a
five (5) year period beginning the date on which it is fully
executed by the parties. This Agreement shall be automatically
renewed for a subsequent five (5) year period unless one (1) of
the parties hereto gives the other party at least ninety (90)
days advance notice, in writing I of its intention not to renew
this Agreement.
10
. .,
SECTION 10. NOTICES. Contact persons for this Agreement
"'\
shall be the City Manager and the County Manager.
FOR THE CITY OF OVIEDO
City Manager
City of Oviedo
400 Alexandria Boulevard
Oviedo, Florida 32765
.FOR THE COUNTY
County Manager
Seminole County Services Building
1101 East First Street
Sanford, Florida 32771
SECTION 11. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Interlocal agreement shall
take effect upon a certified copy being recorded in the Public
Land Records of Seminole County, Florida.
Attest:
CITY OF OVIEDO
~ !
CYNTHIA S. BONHAM, Clerk
By:
MIRIAM W. BRUCE, Mayor
Date:
ATTEST:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA
MARYANNE MORSE
Clerk to the Board of
County Commissioners of
Seminole County, Florida,
By:
CARLTON D. HENLEY, Chairman
Date:
For the use and reliance
of Seminole County only.
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency.
As authorized for execution by
the Board of County Commis-
sioners at their regular
Meeting of , 1999.
County Attorney
II
....
"\
EXHIBIT ~'B"
FUTURE LAND USE EQUIVALENCY CHART
Future Land Use I City Land Use County Land Use
LDR- T
Suburban - Single Family R-lAAA: 20,000 sq. ft. Suburban Estates
PUD: 10,500 sq. ft. I DU/Acre
Low Density Residential- LDR LDR
Single Family 3.5 DU/ Acre 4 DU/Acre
3.85 DU/Acre (PUD) 7 DU/Acre
Medium Density Residential MDR MDR
8 DU/Acre 10 DU/Acre
8.6 DU/Acre (PUD)
High Density Residential I HDR HDR
15 DU/ Acre > 10 DU/Acre
15.75 DU/Acre (PUD)
Office Office Office
.30 FAR .35 FAR
Commercial Commercial ~ Commercial
.5 FAR (includes Office)
PUD: .6 FAR (includes Office, Recreation, .35 FAR
Light Industrial, Public, or Institutional)
Industrial Industrial: <.6 FAR Industrial
PUD: IndustriaV<.6 FAR (includes Office & Commercial)
Commercial! .5 FAR .65 FAR
I Office/.3 FAR
Publici .5 FAR
High Intensity Mixed Use Planned Unit Development High Intensity Planned Development.
Pla"ned Development Residential: <5.0 20 DU/Acre - Transitional
Commercial: <.5 FAR 50 DU/Acre -Core
Office: <.3 FAR .35 FAR
Industrial: <.5 FAR
PublidRecreation I Public Public/Quasi Public
Recreation
Conservation I Conservation Conservation
Ruraf') LDR-T I Rural 10; Rural 5; Rural 3
R-CE: 40,000 sq. ft. lDUIl 0 Acres
PUD: 10,500 sq. ft. I DU/5 Acres
Rural 1 DU/3 Acres
< I DU/Acre
(1) The equivalency chart does not apply to the area between the Winter Spring~ Eastern City Limit and DeLeon Street
which is outside the "Transition Area" and is adopted as Rural-3 on the Seminole County Future Land Use Map.
II.:....~.. II 1111111...1' IlllL IlV
AREkS FOR FUTURE COMPREHE..JSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS
.' ". ~. '"u....: .
_..011.............. --"
FUTURE OVIEDO ANNEXATION AREA
~
4.
N.T.S.
,-.
n
!.. ~7
~~~.~
iY)f <-< '/ ~u
if] ::L
: JU / J'~
:f-~ ~~6= I v./
____L I
, / I
29
~/
,
~~ :!'i
r/
"% ~
(/1/ ~
'/
'/ 0,
~/ ~/
I "
28
,~
'/ ./.:
~
fA
Exhibit "E"
~
"7 ~~
~;/
~/ .'/
,J~
~
IV
.
CITY OF OVIEDO'S
POTABLE WATER SERVICE AREA MAP
DATE: 9/9/1999 I DRAWN BY: WWG I CHECKED BY: ChoS
P2Zl CITY POTABLE WATER SERVICE AREA (\I1'!HIN CITY LIMITS)
~ CITY POTABLE WATER SERVICE AREA (SEMINOLE COUNTY)
NOTE: CITY ALSO WHOLESALES POTABLE WATER TO SEMINOLE COUNTY
FOR '!HE BLACK HAMMOCK AREA
4 r'/
\\ ..;, .....,
./
-
?:
~
~
,
:-~
~
~
~
~7':i ~
~ '.// '////
'./ '/ # /A IS
~~l2
~
j'
'/ ~ '/~/
"// .,.,. .J
-,~'/'f?rf
'~~ ( I
. ~~
~ ~~ /.~
~ ~ .'/
-; ~ ~ 1'/'/
... - - "(p.
(!) '/
r ------,-
.,
~
/
A ~ -
1l?,V////,/ ./ I '/.
'/ I"//~/ '.I~ :
?~~~~-'?
~ 0 ':J.{?
Or..::) _
~~-J~
~ '/ ":~~~
v~ '/ ~ ~~.
./ %-;.:.
~ '/:. .....
'/ "1//.....
'/ "(
2
/' '/
.".
// '/
~/
//~~v
~
.~
'1".1
'/
~
~/ ~ '/
I"/~ ~rt~
,VI '/vv ~L,-O
'? ~ OC)
'/
~ L !
,
;
1 '/ - I
"/ '/ I
i
'/ !
I
I
"1
I
I
I
1..
~
. I \ \
N.T.S.
s
;.--........U ... ".,
.. ... .-. -
,.
I '. , .
i (J"P' ..
Ur~]~,r
z~ /
/
,
i
I
I
:
,
29
LI
I "
28
~ ~~ ~
../
~0
v )
Ii J
~vl
. .. ,\I'j WI ,i ~ ~ I- J
.- ~ ,{~ I [ 8.....
~~ ~Il// ~~ .1 ~
\\ .{f{{ \ trDt ~~~~ 0 0 ~__,.J 0 :
II ~U D. ~; ; ~~'y 24 ~1::7~ ~p 0 ~~ ~i
";1 ~ l rrj~~ ''r~'1 t~~J-ffi~. ~
~~. W ~~~2 ~\ ~t~
9 ~ g~ t:::J If !r ..(I\\~~. b~ C,~ SJ
_I ~ lJ~u;: ~m ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~/ 'T$;--
J L, ~ ii ~~\ ~rs~ C.;Q
<J]II :L f L.v;J M ,~c L'-b --.I b z
r--'~~ 00 ~ - I
4
~I
I~
l2:6
Exhibit "F"
CITY OF OVIEDO'S
SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AREA MAP
DA IT: 12/8/98 DRAWN BY: WNG I CHECKED BY: ChoS
e:Ei:I CITY SEWER AREA 111 (COUNTY \\1-l0LESALE SERV1CE)
~ CITY SEWER AREA 112 (V,lNITR SPRINGS \\1-l0LESALE SERVICE)
'"'l"I
a
~~~
~gs
t'
"
" 1---------
4: 4
.-,
()
C I
I lu
I
:! S)
28
I:: ,)(. H 11:1 I r ; G
CITY OF OVIEDO
CITY REUSE ZONE'.
--
... ......,
m.rr '1.'
DAn. Bln"M
DlU.1rIl IY, ..... ~ IT, c..t
l55l
~
an ~ JJ.. T1:NU. T1W . A TEll lOOC
AU.1AYA l11'1lnU r\.aJC .0..-.::. C~'IOOC
--~
IIOTU. \. 'IlK ~ OK.T .UlOf!aK' AI<aM TlU.T
UI wrrHM TIC MCO/V"'OfU. nP AM.U Of' Tl1ll
an.
t. LOCI(WOOO kYll ~o(lf'-.AT .. .-rn.
TloI c',...,' ~':J J.UJ A T A VTUT.' n<: 1'lZl)I' u-..
I
~'.'I
: ,
...... I
1
,
I
C 'IEDO
-
SEMINOLE COUNT'- JOINT PLANNING AREA
r\~- y, '-I""> r" <'''~'.'\' I" j"t'.\t
\.~~;>~ ~-1 ,l'\ ~ ~ ~:~ ~.:: \...1' \.. l l.... ~ \~ ~ {
\
\
~
EXHIBIT II
Notification
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CITY OF OVIEDO A'ND.SEMINOLE COUNTY
JOINT PLANNING INTERLOCAL AGREElVIENT
The City of Oviedo Land Planning Agency will conduct a
public hearing. on Thursday,- September 16, 1999, beginning
at..rOO PM., in the Council Chamber at City Hall, 400.
.. Alexandria Boulevard, Oviedo, Florida. The purpose of the.
public hearing is to receive public input and input from any.
local gove~ent or other agency and to consider the adop- .
tion of the City o( Oviedo and Seminole County Joint
Planning Interlocal Agreement andfqJ:Ward a recornp1enda-
tion to the:. City Council. The Interl9cal Agreement includes
sections for intergovei-nmental coordination and coopenitioh . .
. -. \.
on comprehensive plan amendments; public service facility
improvements; school' site land acquisitions, construction
and/or expansion;. and annexations.
All interested parties may appear at the public hearing and be
heard. The City of Oviedo and Seminole County Joint
Plarining Interlocal Agreement may be -reviewed on or after
Thursday, September 9, 1999 at the Plannirig Department .
located in the City Hall Al!nex, 320 Alexandria Boulevard,
: .~eekdays frorTI 8:30 A.M. TO 5:00 P.M.
. .
.: ~
'-. ;-
Persons with disabilities needing assistance to participate in
this.~proceeding should contact the ADA Coordinator at 977-
60d5~ 48.hours in advance of the meeting.
~
i
; .
'. .-.:
:..:: ADVICE TO TI-IE PUBLIC: If any person decides to appeal
"\.a decision with respect to any matter considered at the above
'.meeting or hearing, he will need a verbatim record of all pro-
ceedings including the testimony and evidence, which record
is not provided by the City of Oviedo (FS. 286.0 105).
;.?
.. I
[) rrl!J 7- J ""'Y <> ~ r ..4 s
~;;j I~ J/Plv~ k-d-
~VI)9))a/p;AI r-Y~-YI4-~
A r~?~1
67} ,)--~v~ A-4--I/E- /L-^~
-=-Yo /A/ vJ>L~ ft--5 IN
. .N~ -;;Y / A-ji } t:Pfl $ -
~N~);==Y~Y h// y;J ~pF
~7 ;rrp<7J ~ ---JPA=
A?- Y~b9~