HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999 03 22 Regular Item D
COMMISSION AGENDA
!
i
I
i
I
.ITEM
!
D
Consent
Informational
Public Hearing
Regular X
i
March 22, 1999
Meeting
Mr: ytt
Authorization
REQUEST:
,
I
The Community Ioevelopment Department - Planning Division requests the City
I
Commission hold a public hearing for the first reading of Ordinance 716 to change
I
the Future Land pse Map designation on Lots 5, 5A, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 along
Arnold Lane in the North Orlando Ranchlands, Section 1 A
I
i
PURPOSE:
I
The purpose of this Board item is to request the Commission consider approving a small scale
comprehensive plan amendmentito change the Future Land Use designation of Lots 5, 5A, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12 along Arnold Lane id the North Orlando Ranchlands, Section lA, from "Rustic
Residential" (1 DU or less per a~re) to "Lower Density Residential" (1.1 - 3.5 DU per acre) in
recognition of the fact that som~ of the lots in the North Orlando Ranchlands, Section 1A were
platted at less than one (1) acre.j
APPLICABLE LAW AND P1!JBLIC POLICY:
!
The provisions of 163.3187(1)(~) F.S. which states in part "Any local government comprehensive
plan amendments directly relate~ to proposed small scale development activities may be approved
without regard to statutory limifs on the frequency of consideration of amendments to the local
comprehensive plan. !
A local government is not required to comply with the requirements of l63.3184(15)(c) F.S.
I
concerning the holding of two (2) public hearings for adoption of a small scale amendment if the
local government complies with!the provisions of 166.041(3)(c) F.S. for a municipality [i.e. no
transmittal public hearing to sen:d the amendment to the Florida Department of Community
Affairs]. :
MARCH 22, 1999
REGULAR AGENDA ITEM D
Page 2
CONSIDERATIONS:
· North Orlando Ranches,; Section 1A Subdivision was approved and recorded in
November, 1958.
· Some of the sublots of the North Orlando Ranches, Section lA Subdivision are under 1
acre III size.
I
· The Future Land Use de:signation of the area at the time of platting and recordation of the
North Orlando Ranches, Section 1A Subdivision was "Rural Residential" (1 DU or less
per acre). ;
· The zoning of the area a~ the time of platting was R-CI (1 DU per acre maximum)
· On April 27, 1992, a net Comprehensive Plan for the City was adopted.
· Presently, the Future Land Use designation of the area of North Orlando Ranches, Section
lA Subdivision is "Rust~c Residential".
· Presently, the zoning designation of the area of North Orlando Ranches, Section 1A
Subdivision is R-CI "Sin~le Family Dwelling" District (1 DU per acre maximum).
,
· An oversight was made ~t the time of the formulation of the Future Land Use Map
(FLUM) for the adopte~ Comprehensive Plan in 1992, which should have recognized that
various lots in the Nort~ Orlando Ranchlands were platted with less than one acre lots.
i
I
· Mr. Markward had applied for a building permit to erect a storage shed in the year yard,
but was denied by staff, kince he did not meet the zoning requirements for the R-CI
District. He then applied to the Board of Adjustment to receive favorable
recommendation for a v~riance to the land development regulations so that he may erect
his proposed structure ($torage shed).
FUNDING:
No funds are required from the City.
FINDINGS:
· North Orlando Ranches, Section 1 A Subdivision was approved and recorded in
November, 1958!.
MARCH 22, 1999
REGULAR AGENDA ITEM D
Page 3
· Some of the sublots of the North Orlando Ranches, Section lA Subdivision are
I
under 1 acre in size.
!
· The Future Lan~ Use designation of the area at the time of platting and
recordation ofthie North Orlando Ranches, Section lA Subdivision was "Rural
I
Residential" (1 DU or less per acre)
I
· The zoning of the area at the time of platting was R-CI (1 DU per acre maximum)
I
I
· On April 27, 19~2, a new Comprehensive Plan for the City was adopted.
I
I
· Presently, the Fu~ure Land Use designation of the area of North Orlando Ranches,
Section 1A Subdivision is "Rustic Residential".
!
I
· Presently, the zohing designation of the area of North Orlando Ranches, Section
I
1A Subdivision i~ R-CI "Single Family Dwelling" District (1 DU per acre
maximum). i
· Due to an oversight an error was made at the time of the formulation of the Future
Land Use Map (fLUM) for the adopted Comprehensive Plan in 1992, which
I
should have reco'gnized that various lots in the North Orlando Ranchlands were
platted with less ~han one acre lots.
· The proposed future land use change from "Rustic Residential" to "Lower Density
Residential" on the subject property(s) is compatible with surrounding land use
I
designations, The proposed change will not cause any nuisance that negatively
impacts adjacentlland uses, all single-family residential, since the change merely
involves a density change not a change in the nature of the land use.
I
· The comprehens~ve plan amendment is compatible with the other elements of the
City's Comprehensive Plan
I
· . The comprehensive plan amendment is compatible with (does not conflict with) the
State Comprehensive Plan, in Chapter 187 F.S.
· The comprehensive plan amendment is compatible with (does not conflict with) the
East Central Flo~ida Comprehensive Regional Policy Plan.
!
MARCH 22,1999
REGULAR AGENDA ITE~ D
Page 4
LOCAL PLANNING AGENc!:Y RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COMMISSION:
I
I
Based oJ the Staff Report and the Findings "I move that those properties
contiguobs to Arnold Lane that are less than one acre, that we recommend
to the Ci~y Commission that they change the Future Land Use Map
designati6n to "Lower Density Residential" (1.1 - 3.5 DU per acre)-
I
specifically Lots 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12, and possibly considering 5A and 5,
if in fact ~hey are less than one acre"
MOTrON:
VOTE:
U . i
nammous
I
STAFF RECOMMENDA TIdN TO THE CITY COMMISSION:
Staff requests lhe City Commission hold a public hearing for the first reading of
Ordinance 7161to change the Future Land Use Map designation on Lots 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12 along Arnold Lane in the North Orlando Ranchlands, Section 1A from
"Rustic Residehtial" (1 DU or less per acre) to "Lower Density Residential"
(1.1- 3.5 DU Jer acre) in recognition of the fact that some of the lots in the
North OrlandolRanchlands Section 1A were platted at less than one (1) acre.
I
I
NOTE: Staff checked the acreage size of Lots 5A and 5. They are both just above one (1)
acre; l.05 acres and !l.ll acres respectively.
I
I
lMPLEMENTA TION SCHEDULE:
I
The Commission would hold a ~econd public hearing on April 12, 1999 and adopt Ordinance 716.
The ordinance "shall become effective at the expiration of thirty (30) days after adoption or at any
date specified therein" (in the ordinance) [per Section 4.15~ City Charter].
ATTACHMENTS:
I
i
I
Staff Report on (SM-CP~-1-99) Small Scale Comprehens Plan Amendment in the
Ranchlands.
Map of part of North Orlando Ranchlands Section lA, Lots 7,8,9, 10, 11, 12 proposed to
be redesignated from FLUM designation "Rustic Residential" to "Lower Density
Residential" .
Future Land Use Map oft~e area.
,
MARCH 22, 1999
REGULAR AGENDA ITEM D
Page 5
Zoning Map of the area.
Minutes of the Planning ~ Zoning Board / Local Planning Agency meeting
of March 3, 1999. I
I
Application for Variance By George Markward.
!
I
Drawing of the Markwardi property
i
I
COMMISSION ACTION:
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS. FLORIDA 32700,2799
Telephone (407) 327.1000
Community Development Dept.
Planning Division
PLANNING & ZONING !BOARD / LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
AGENDA ITEM
II. A.
SMALL SCALE.COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT IN
THE RANCHLANDS [SM-CPA-1-99]
Staff Report
REQUEST:
Staff requests the Board: recommend a change to the Future Land Use Map designation
from "Rustic Residential" ( maximum 1 DU per acre) to "Lower Density Residential"
(1.1 - 3.5 DU per acre) on the applicant's property as well as to other lots along Arnold
-Lane, to make the designation compatible with the less than one acre lot sizes on Arnold
Lane.
PURPOSE:
Because these lots cannot comply with the current Future Land Use Map designation, the
Local Planning Agency 'must consider recommending to the City Commission a change
in Future Land Use Map designation from "Rustic Residential" to "Lower Density
Residential" to make the designation compatible with the applicant's less than one acre
lot size on Arnold Lane. (There are other lots less than one acre on Arnold Lane also.)
Then, in a separate agenda item [ Item II.B. ], as the Planning & Zoning Board, consider
a rezoning of the lots to accord with the fact that they were platted at less than one acre.
APPLICABLE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY:
The provisions of 163.3187(1)(c) F.S. which states in part "Any local government
comprehensive plan amendments directly related to proposed small scale development
activities may be approved without regard to statutory limits on the frequency of
consideration of amendments to the local comprehensive plan.
A local government is not required to comply with the requirements of 163.3184(1 5)(c)
F.S. concerning the holding of two (2) public hearings for adoption of a small scale
amendment if the local government complies with the provisions of 166.041(3)(c) F.S.
for a municipality [i.e. no transmittal public hearing to send the amendment to the Florida
Department of Community Affairs].
1. SUMMARY OF APPLICATION
1. APPLICANT:
OWNER:
George Markward
255 Arnold Lane
Winter Springs, FL 32708
696-6111
George Markward
2. BACKGROUND:
Mr. Markward had applied for a building permit to erect a storage shed in the rear
yard, but was denied by staff, since he did not meet the zoning requirements for the
R-CI District. He then applied to the Board of Adjustment to receive favorable
recommendation for a variance to the land development regulations so that he may
erect his proposed structure.
A. SITE INFORMATION
1. PARCEL NUMBER
02-21-30-506-0HOO-0 120
Lot 12
George & Catherine Markward
OTHER LOTS UNDER ONE ACRE IN NEAR PROXIMITY TO APPLICANT:
02-21-30-506-0HOO-0070 Lot 7 Bobby & Mary Davis
02-21-30-506-0HOO-0080
02- 21- 30- 5 06-0HOO:'0090
02-21-30-506-0HOO-0 1 00
Lot 8
Lot 9
Lot 10
Elda G. Wehrli
(( "
(( "
02-21-30-506-0HOO-011O
Lot 11
Don Campbell
2. ACREAGE:
.59 acres (Lot 12 - applicant)
3. GENERAL LOCATION:
At the southwest corner of the intersection of Arnold Lane and Sunrise Avenue in the
North Orlando Ranches, Section I A Subdivsiion.
4. LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Lot 12, Block M, Nbrth Orlando Ranches Section lA as recorded in Plat Book 12
Page 31 - 32 in the Public Records of Seminole County, Florida.
5. CHRONOLOGY OF SUBJECT PROPERTY:
This property and the North Orlando Ranches area was part of the original Village of
North Orlando durin;g the 1950s. Most of The North Orlando Ranches Subdivision
Sections were platted during 1958-59.
6. DEVELOPMENT If RENDS:
This area has been established as a low density single family residential area since the
late 1950s. Just to the east of Fisher Road is Seville Chase, a single family residential
subdivision consisting of 110 lots on 102 acres, recorded on September 4, 1996.
7. EXISTING LAND [USE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY:
Single family reside~tial.
8. LETTERS/PHONE CALLS IN FAVOR OR IN OPPOSITION:
None at the time of~reparation of this report.
9. CITY COMMISSION DISTRICT:
District 5
B. EXISTING LAND USES ADJACENT TO SUBJECT PROPERTY:
North:
vacant, semi;'treed lot.
South:
Single-family residential structure.
East:
Single-family residential structure.
West:
Single-fa~ily residential structure.
C. FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY:
Existing:
Rustic Residential (lDU or less per acre)
Requested:
Lower Density Residential (1.1 - 3.5 DU per acre)
D. FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS ADJACENT TO SUBJECT PROPERTY:
North:
Rustic Residential
South:
Lower Density Residential
East:
Lower D~nsity Residential
West:
Rustic R~sidential
E. ZONING OF SUBJECT PROPERTY:
Existing:
R-CI Sirigle Family Dwelling District (maximum 1 DU per acre)
Requested:
R1-AA 00,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size)
F. ZONING ADJACENT TO SUBJECT PROPERTY:
North:
R-CI
South:
R-1 AA
East:
R-1AA
West:
R-CI
II. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT ANALYSIS:
The following summarizes the data and/or issues which staff analyzed in reviewing this
application.
A. PUBLIC FAClLITIES:
1. ROADS/TRAFFIC CIRCULATION:
a. Availability ofiAccess:
Access to Lot 7,8,9, 10, 11, 12 is from Arnold Lane, which in turn connects to
Fisher Road.
b. Function Classification:
Arnold Road is classified as local road. Fisher Road is a 2-lane municipal
collector road.
c. Improvements/expansions (including right-or-way acquisition) already
programmed or needed as a result of the proposed amendment.
None.
2. SANITARY SEWER, SOLID WASTE, STORMWATERMANAGEMENT,
POTABLE WATER:
POT ABLE W ATEK
a. Facilities serving the site.
None.
!
b. Improvements/expansions needed as a result of proposed amendment:
None.
SANITARY SEWER:
a. Facilities servihg the site.
None.
b. Improvements/expansions needed as a result of proposed amendment:
None.
RE-USE WATER SiYSTEM:
a. Facilities servihg the site.
None.
b. Improvements1expansions needed as a result of proposed amendment:
None.
DRAINAGE/STORMW ATER:
a. Facilities serving the site.
None. No structural drainage system. Conceptually the lots were designed to
allow runoff to flow down to the several ponds in the area.
b. Improvements/expansions needed as a result of proposed amendment:
!
None.
SOLID WASTE:
a. Facilities servihg the site.
The City has ail exclusive franchise agreement with Browning Ferris Industries
for collection.
b. Improvements/expansions needed as a result of proposed amendment:
None.
3. RECREATION ANP OPEN SPACE
a. Facilities serving the site.
None.
b. Improvements/expansions needed as a result of proposed amendment:
None.
B. LAND USE COMPATIBILITY:
1. TOPOGRAPHY:
The subject property ranges from a high of forty (65) feet (above mean sea level) at
the intersection of Arnold Lane and Sunrise Avenue to sixty (60) feet toward the
southwest to the pon'd. The area immediately surrounding Arnold Lane trending
toward the southwest to the pond exhibits a similar topographic range.
2. FLOOD PRONE AREA:
A review of the FEN,1A National Flood Insurance Program Rate Map (12117C0145-
E; April 17, 1995) indicates the northwestern portion of the subject land is partly
I
located within the 100 year flood prone area.
3. NATURAL RESOURCES, HISTORIC RESOURCES.
No natural or historic resources are known to exist on the subject land.
4. WILDLIFE AND SPECIES DESIGNATED AS ENDANGERED, THREATENED
OR SPECIAL CONCERN:
No federally listed endangered plants are known to exist in the county. It is essential
that surveys of such :species be completed prior to site development of parcels
containing native vegetation communities. The subject parcel does not have native
vegetation communities due to prior clearing and replanting with long-needle pine.
5. NUISANCE POTE~TIAL OF PROPOSED USE TO SURROUNDING LAND
USES.
The proposed future! land use change from "Rustic Residential" to "Lower Density
Residential" will not cause any nuisance that negatively impacts adjacent land uses,
all single-family residential, since the change merely involves a density change not a
change in the nature:ofthe land use.
C. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT:
N/A
D. CONSISTENCY/COMPATIBILITY WITH CITY, STATE, AND REGIONAL
COMPREHENSIVE PlJANS:
The City of Winter Springs Comprehensive Plan fully complies with the State
Comprehensive Plan adopted pursuant to Chapter 187, Florida Statutes, and the Strategic
Regional Policy Plan oftne East Central Florida Regional Planning Council pursuant to
Chapter 163 Florida Statu~es.
1. WITH THE CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
The land proposed to be placed in the new FLUM designation "Lower Density
Residential" is compatible with the Future Land Use Map "Rustic Residential" land
use designation to tIie south and east of the subject property. The comprehensive
plan amendment is compatible with and not in conflict with the other elements of the
City's Comprehensive Plan. specifically:
2. WITH THE STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
163.3177(10)(A) F.S.
The comprehensive plan amendment is compatible with and furthers goals and
policies of the State Comprehensive Plan in Chapter 187 F.S.
3. WITH THE EAST CENTRAL FLORIDA COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL
POLICY PLAN: 1:86.507 F.S.; 27-E-4 F.AC.
The comprehensive plan amendment is compatible with and furthers goals and
policies of the East Central Florida Comprehensive Regional Policy Plan.
III. FINDINGS:
. North Orlando Ranches, Section 1A Subdivision was approved and recorded in
November, 19581.
. Some of the subfots of the North Orlando Ranches, Section 1A Subdivision are
under 1 acre in size.
I
· The Future Lan~ Use designation of the area at the time of platting and
recordation ofth~ North Orlando Ranches, Section 1A Subdivision was "Rural
Residential" (1 pU or less per acre)
I
· The zoning ofthp area at the time of platting was R-CI (1 DU per acre maximum)
· On April 27, 19~2, a new Comprehensive Plan for the City was adopted.
· Presently, the Future Land Use designation of the area of North Orlando Ranches,
Section 1 A Sub~ivision is "Rustic Residential".
· Presently, the zoning designation of the area of North Orlando Ranches, Section
1A Subdivision is R-CI "Single Family Dwelling" District (1 DU per acre
maximum).
· Due to an oversight an error was made at the time of the formulation of the Future
Land Use Map (FLUM) for the adopted Comprehensive Plan in 1992, which
should have recognized that various lots in the North Orlando Ranchlands were
platted with less ~han one acre lots.
· The proposed future land use change from "Rustic Residential" to "Lower
Density Residential" on the subject property(s) is compatible with surrounding
land use designations, The proposed change will not cause any nuisance that
negatively impa~ts adjacent land uses, all single-family residential, since the
change merely iryvolves a density change not a change in the nature of the land
use.
· The comprehensive plan amendment is compatible with the other elements of the
City's Comprehensive Plan
· The comprehensive plan amendment is compatible with (does not conflict with)
the State Comprehensive Plan, in Chapter 187 F.S.
· The comprehensive plan amendment is compatible with (does not conflict with)
the East Central Florida Comprehensive Regional Policy Plan.
IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the Staff ~eport and the Findings and since there are other lots along
Arnold Lane that alsb fall below the 1 DU or less per acre requirement of the Future
Land Use Map "Rus:tic Residential" designation, staff strongly recommends the
Local Planning Age~cy make the following recommendation to the City Commission:
That the City Q:ommission approve a small scale plan amendment
changing the F~ture Land Use Map (pLUM) designation of the properties (Lot
7, 8, 9, 10, 11, \12 from "Rustic Residential" (1 DU or less per acre) to "Lower
Density Residential" (1.1 - 3.5 DU per acre) in recognition of the fact that some
of the lots in the North Orlando Ranchlands Section 1A were platted at less than
one (1) acre.
ATTACHMENTS:
Map of part of North Orl.a:ndo Ranchlands Section 1A, Lots 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 proposed to
be redesignated from FLUM designation "Rustic Residential" to "Lower Density
Residential"
Fkuture Land Use Map of the area.
Zoning Map of the area.
Application for Variance by George Marlcward
Drawing of the Marlcward property
39
o
no
1 A
--------------------
~ ~.~~.
~ .~
....Q~
" )
HUlet; t:
r...~:
(B
(JI.CJO
--
9.0
65 ~
10.A
10.0 pN'lAMA
RO :;l
~
n
-'
,
>;
1Il
W
>-
<(
1.0 :I:
I.A
8.B
3
6.A
~
6.A 6.0
BLOCK D
A
. r- ,;1
... .~
..>lIt"
10
14
x
g 15
....
'"
17
~~..),--~~:.;-~)~,--~ '::.. ',I '\,~:::0~'?~1~_:?-;;:-;;~~'~:~0~/W""~~';PiiIi' ,~'--! ;;~. ~.-.-:::;) ~'"'.,>'-.:-..''' ~-.:._-,--.\\\\'~ ~ "..\\ . ~'~~i'''''''~'
.-' ..... . "~ ' =-=:-_"'--=/ /~ '. y." ~"~", "'.... ..---- -3 ~ . " .,
\'....... Q-;:-'.:-' i,,~~":::=='::-7;=.-==-?/, /'. ^:. " {"".I," ~-'"'''''''''''''''' V""'.' ,', " ~'.
~ ....... ' -... =~-==-_._~= ~ Y7\. . =-:x::-_.... '. '> '.... '........ '" .... . , . ,. " I . ,
""',,, " ',':.J,~ '~-7j~~-E1~'---"'~ X~4\,V/f,JJiK~~'~ . "~ ..,.....,~ ,~~~.~ .'<','" \.,' .\ '.).J .....'.
2,~. ~-;:? 1-\ '. .::::,~~~k~~g7~~ ~~-,-.:'~~7!~~........ "~."...- ........ ......-<,-,...... ,\",<,.~l:~~~.:....--
~~~ -- . '" = -:. .' ......1. .--=T4~ i' "-\' ,......." "".~'C . . '., ,
T T? .. D.: ':h:l'~'I""IIC;') ("';;'~~.::x '-;.o~.~~~~{ <" '} ',,"'."<~....iV''':'' ,'. ',' ::...-:---:::i~
- ::....--.\~ _---L:\ -d.-,.-' . ':,>< ~. / y-;,:,"" -~' 1'....\' .. .. ~ Z-~ ~I .-- --6.":)~.<c,;
::-r 'A I' -_~-., ;- . ~~'-'-'O .~,. W~~ t i?:i(Y~~~>~,;./,:"" ~ '~<:M-~'~J __Y7.;~S""" ~~~\~~~'?~JC?C:~~~~~'
"T ......,."'-- f, l' r;ll~' . <X 'r-"x ,1'",. .~- ~ .',\: '-~, ~~ r- __~, r ' --r:: '. C:._'_' 0 O_I...(,J... "
I ~"" -',,~'C --I ,-" .' :;::;.-::: . . . ,I. i -.) 0 0 oJ '
. , ,I-. "'~,,~ ~. .- -- , '-.':. f-:-+--ll~ :>00{'IOCCc?C~'-
( :/\.s-: - \' :f ,)<;. "K: ~ ,1';. 1\' I l: ~ ~~."'" q I ' .,~~.~. .=.). o-a 0..0_'
..., '- , '~ .. '. . ,,,y ~ - ~ - , . r, -..' 0 (; Co \..' ::l
-'-"- ... -". '., . . L. 'r~ ,~~. ' ..' ." ',' - . C~ cor. C1 ~
",'- ......., '. ___oo..---!,. '~.,,Jl'" ~~~."'. ~.=---.. Y""I ~\r..: ,,"l:a~".~.' 'I.'i:'{'~. Ci::J()'-(;-'r,~q ,:
" ,'" ----. ":"..'. ""'~:"'J~'" .',....,....~~:..'.::~.. ro.. 'i q '.. ..,' :...':~...'.:.t.~.:/:..t:\_O.':-?rPr,.:......;
. :\\ ." ;"f '.: ~X;;'. 'r1t,,:...;;, ,. '''. ~,..,. ':.' "~i':C':, ':"'~' ---"I'.~: ;},.i.;.'-:k.-~~ "L! -OC0-'0-'=~'-: .....
~ //\.' to;.:.-.. ,1of'" ..,'.~ ;,;v, ...." ,.'lI:\:i..:"-'; i.'.\i'..!-,c....... :..... ,"" '..:....,~....\:.".C_O_C'_.....I-:
~ '-J (f' _ . - . ~ .-:: . . ..,:':' ';,"{:/. .,.'.... - ,. ...)l,H "-. ~. .... ~ ~: ii:' "'::, "~13'1~""'~:",~, ':'."f.:' "" ,:XP~c~'o\... C'
c-:::.;n"*_ ,.-,....;;.,... . 'II c'" . ',." ,'".\:...., . '-" - r. 0 C
- . =---1:' . ~ ':'J.- . . ~,,> ,,-.;.... .~." .,. ,- .~. .". "j .. ';.c.O.; I . ,... 'JCJO -. """L'
. . J7~ ...... I' . ~.. 0-,-. :f .... ....,-.<.. ,: '- ~.., ..... ,'~.".'" ~.. ....,-,..l .:. '- '0 0'-:-::(
~I-:' :~::'c~~;: ::'.~~" '.', :-...~";;- :'.' ;~'~{~':~ ;:~~1\"'1' "..:..,'fr'-"-"~'i:;::;' t:..:..: .~v~
. __- (' . . ~1'. -.' ~t....~.", 1'~"':';"~..~..!..7[r;:----ti ..~..~~,. ...~;1 ~~ '.t..r: ....,., 'I:'~. "'~.' ..,..,. ".. .
_ ......,...... ":'~.:f':"", ',. ..l}rNTC:~j i,...~'....... .-'!._,\I..'...... , . .... .~.j-.:or '::._: .: ,"
~ ..' .. " t~,q':':,,:'-; .J' i: .'. ..: '" . . "~ ~". . ,~';\.-,-~'" ~ I; "!>>"T ',. ;:';' '.: [rt[~~l .
./'/ . '1~" . ',\"\1\..,;<' (.",,'.d',..v'.~ ..... . .,.......' - '. r '..f '.r. 4;1' ',. .'t I...., -
';,u: " \ . . '\.'- : ~. ,.,...t.;. .. "" ...... -". ,.~:.'!.:!-: t: flli # , _ . ::::~:::;~'f::,-L-.:i.~_:.:::" ..! !.I ~. .j,.., :" . ". D:S"OS~:
"; ., ~'~"""""'-:.\:\.Z)\~:-"~';~: :,:-.'....a,.;-;.J-.. ".' .1..,.........." " r ~A..O"'fP~..':I. :..'~ \~:
~.. :-;.:;. ,"~V ..~.t., . . -r"" .~.!.::+;'...:.,~rt~'-t..: .~ r ..~. ~~".Jo-.1Q!..,;;<:; .:_.'c_.l
. . '.\:~.~ :'..:' ". . . ;,'.~f'~', ." i '''J.2.;.::c;~.-'. ',:; '.:.:". I '.: ~I::', I.~"!! ,;. . . '. ,_
I : \ \: -.!,-\: .).!': \ . ,: (' . . ',.' . II . I'... . . 'I-- .+.. ,'" , ': , . ;. 1 , t T .
.~"V:~~~~~c., ~'.1......t\i\.!.,~:.. :';;."-J~ ;'-.\..':.:~ :'; "',: : ;.:; ; i';7!:-:~,.:";~'~:\<''l..-:--
. :\..-...... ~ "'I '--R,"r "1' .,' ...... .,." .,. ,,', t . ,......q. ......,...,!.,
- . ~" ':X~"d \., ': : v\ --L I'f..,. .,'j:, "J..; .:: '. :.'. --+-"'\.-...... ,.; .v-' . .. -t~.,:, ....,'~ [L[C1:
" , · . '-l '. \ ~ . I" ..... / .' . ~. " .' \" , :'\-'" . . , . I :, '- ... '- _rl
~ ~ t~,'~~~'L' . ~ -j:..... ~.. X~~}: ..:;.'!::'j" '.:.''- .;t . r.;~: :,:-r. t:!. ~l "y-~. ~ 'I'.! \ ~i ( i ; ". ,L " ':I~'" &~'~. . .:. ~;~
~ .-.. ~&''''l t:.1 .-" . .1.:.")......~,.~,l.... ...... :" ~'~i.:;\':'" I "of.,'.. ", ,..~. ~
;. :~"'~,~..~~ . ,...' '.'1\ \., ..' ]'I~" "'jl.'.' " I~'~" .{,\: ~.'.I IT"':':. '.-... ~. "~"" ~:
... . /. ",-. ".i' . . -""-r' .,-:- ..~! 1-:'.."" ,. .'. .' ." ...., __ \ . ,,,. "t;')
. X:~, '.= ~I ~ '''''''''.. VI, I,,:.~r :1.".,..,::.;,.. :\I:~..:ifl~"l j:'-';",:, \. .....::-,........ ~ .~.
'- "V'\- ',~ ',.. .:-- '.' i ~ , .'1.'1 ..; ;'. ". . ',; "I.......... ~ '" '
~~ '. ~~~'\.~' .~:'f.I':':l~\V-\ ::) ': ,.r:': '~"*:"'I".~:,r{.::~,~fJ' :::,+;rJRh; ~/~~. :/.~~ ~~>.>,~,.~~': .'
. "'Y' ~\., ..",N~"Y I".:i ~~\ ::-.d.'J' j !....:8~'..:i.3YJ'::-~I~r.}. lI,j '. ~!.: ~~'~"~nri:-
*'<~'S '<. "- : : .\ ,l.\' ". 1'0..:' . .?" ~,C'" ~M' . :J ~. ;. : .:.'1'.: i' K:> >. <\1 ". '::.; ..v.4-
~"-Y'J<J;:V}j, , ........ : '.' "I\\.: .. I" ,P~SIV(~' "~ - . - '., .:. .:............<', '..':""-.J';" i
. ... ." . -~ - "':++- ' . I ; . I PAAK' . ~;:. . (\ . ~ ' . t !. l' . ""." , '" "" '. i \
":'J,,..~;<..;-1~,,,~.... \.~ J : I i ._,\1 ; I I ! ~. ~ :'. f',/-:~~,,; .' "\'" ;. ~ : ..I,:..~. ". ':l.......... "'->>''''<:''~>\ ~:!l"
,~~~..... . '; I I I ~-'.,i.:...--;-. ;'. ~ - I :-,.!. : ~ ""'" ". " ".., ..."........" ". '......... '\. '- - .__
1.- !(~.'!~"'.J.~." I I . I .~ '1 1."( t I.' . ~ ~ '\...... ~," ./"",, '" ,,~,' . -I-
~. .r,~~,.,. :; /,/ : '.- ". I" !T, i ;.......... ~~;1.~..,', ....,....,..,). <,",,"""'''-'.,-i !
'" "~""<: . ! ~// - . 1.\ I · Y'., \ ." ,/'\.!~. ,", '."" '" '.'. . :.'1 >: \
....... ,''W..: )~~....r-J . . .' ~ ~ T~ ~.~" '~-5 .: -..',,', .......l.~-"~' ..,..........." ""'~'\,I~ -
. ,,-\\. ~~,... .. no I _~I U ~ ...., ~ '\ ' , ... . ".............
". -..: =--! i . : _ . . - . ,,", K. '. ' ". . . """ '......'...... .j - ;
. . I . '. - ',' , . ' ' " ,. '. ,", :'\:: .,~' . " '. . I
') -- . . . , . '.. ..." . .. "', " ,"( ""... t-
. ~ t I.' ..;( "~.,' '.. ;..... , " "\.. '.. '.." "". ", "... ",".. ~
. .. ~ ... := " . " . .... ~ ...., ~, " ~...'~~' '.~ .,...." '.. ' .,..... ...... .. '.. \-i-'
: ~ r---. :. .. 'il ,- ..I,:;.~, . ','. .'. . .', .,.,...."
~ .' .!r ' - .. " ''''-....1'' ", '. "....,:' . ,
. .. .. , , . ' '-.;, K' '. . , ~ . ,- >.~ 1.' " . , ........, ..... ,'-:'\ I'
. .'- 'f- ,. I ~., :jl.<~" ,,, ",-.'-'. ........1 ; r
~.~ Lot 12 - Applicant's (Markward') p;:perty' .', ..,.: :~::"~ ,:.~.;~::.. <~.2~?>~"'~"~.:.~::~~~~~~! r\.~
~ . .. . "-..J ...... 'y......... '. -. '., '. .... '.', . .... \ .
. .' '. "':-l <",<...........,'......r.:-...,,'-~'..>..,......~.~:'-...................... .>.~,~",.......,', ~.
; I, ",." '" ..... ....... " '. " ........ '- __ "".' '"' '" "'.... .,0 '." '. 'J 1\;
. " )~ " ........... , ',., ' ~.......... "\ +
~.,.'- ~-.:~,~~.~'<<,.;., \ ~
.. ,,,...,.>~~ ;;;'.'''-~':t.'<~~~ ~ l' \l:
"" "'~~ ".........:> \,~).....~." ~'';:.' ~~ 'v J-l t
: ~\~z:;:..\~::--. '. ' ( ~
. . ~.' . ';.
. ,
\
\
LA.!~D..: ~~~~ LEGEND r
,
, 4--':'
~ : ~ ' . RustiC
. ;-~ ll.......;~, Residential
i. _I ,J I
, I I .
r..-. .
~"""~-:-;'.L ~
i:~~~D~~:irtY - ..
~~.~ Residentia!
.........
I .,
/
,,-
-'
.. ......_-.._~
I J.. . .'
...l.'
l""'[ :;.r;
--.
!
~ / f
I:
,
I
I
,
.
\ \ (\ . II ~l..
\\ ,,~,,~
: . . .1' A: '~..')''-.. b't,
.R- ,
.. .
, ....... ..'
lMl: OR
Lo~ 12 - Applicant's (Markward) property
:5
!
urt/o
Lot.
_I
~
:U
f.
a
:fi
...
...
l N(( OR
/1 nnn
MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LP A
MARCH 3, 1999 - REGULAR MEETING
I. CALL TO ORDER
Pledge Of Allegiance
The Planning And Zoning BoardlLPA meeting was called to order Wednesday, March 3,
1999 at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Tom Brown in the Commission Chambers of the
Municipal Building (City Hall, 1126 East State Road 434, Winter Springs, Florida
32708). The Pledge of Allegiance followed.
Roll Call
Tom Brown, Chairman, present
Carl Stephens, Jr., Vice Chairman, present
Marc Clinch, present
Bill Fernandez, present
Rosanne Karr, present
Also Present
Tom Grimms, AlCP, Comprehensive Planning/Zoning Coordinator
Approval Of The January 20,1999 Planning And Zoning BoardlLPA Special
Meeting Minutes
"I'll move that we approve these minutes as circulated, by mail". Motion by Bill
Fernandez. Seconded by Carl Stephens, Jr. Discussion. The Motion to adopt the
minutes of January 20, 1999 was approved with consensus of the Board. Motion
passed.
TI. REGULAR AGENDA
A. Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendments in the Ranchlands
Mr. Tom Grimms, AlCP, Comprehensive Planning/Zoning Coordinator presented
"Findings" and "Staff Recommendations" to the Board, as they pertain to this matter.
There was discussion about adjacent properties and notice to property owners; lot sizes;
and including other properties that would have contiguous boundaries, such as lots SA,S,
and possibly 6. Issues pertaining to the local Homeowner's Association was also
discussed, and Board Member Carl Stephens, Jr., spoke specifically on this issue and on
the actual sizes of lots.
MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LPA
MARCH 3,1999 - REGULAR MEETING
PAGE 2 OF 4
"I Move that those properties contiguous to Arnold Lane that are less than one acre,
that we recommend to the City Commission that they change the Future Land Use
Map designation to "Lower Density Residential" - specifically 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12;
and possibly considering SA and 5, if in fact they are less than one acre". Motion by
Bill Fernandez. Seconded by Carl Stephens, Jr. Discussion. Vote: Marc Clinch:
Aye; Bill Fernandez: Aye; Rosanne Karr: Aye; Tom Brown: Aye; Carl Stephens,
Jr.: Aye. Motion passed.
B. Administrative Rezonings in the Ranchlands
Mr. Grimms advised the Board of Staffs "Findings" and related "Recommendations"
regarding this matter.
"I'll make the same Motion or recommendation that the City Commission approve
changing the Zoning Map designations of those properties adjacent to Arnold Lane,
that are less than one acre in size, and specifically including lots 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and
12 and having the City check or explore the possibility of SA and 5, along Arnold
Lane, from RC-1 "Single Family Dwelling" Unit, to R-1AA "One Family Dwelling"
District, ten thousand square feet minimum lot size, and favorably recommend that
to the City Commission". Motion by Rosanne Karr. Discussion. Vote: Bill
Fernandez: Aye; Tom Brown: Aye; Carl Stephens, Jr.: Aye; Marc Clinch: Aye;
Rosanne Karr: Aye. Motion passed.
C. Proposed GreeneWay Interchange Zoning District
Mr. Grimms introduced Mr. Michel Wadley, of Wadley and Associates, Inc. who gave a
brief overview of some of the related issues. There was discussion of the proposed
district; design considerations; zoning and permitted uses; the possibility of upgrading
Springs Avenue; and Agreements.
Ms. Margaret Casscells, 907 Old New England Avenue, Winter Park, Florida: spoke on
appropriate land uses; design standards; and related documentation.
Discussion ensued on upcoming issues, along with upcoming Amendments, and Board of
Adjustments' recommendations regarding variances.
Comments were also made about the "July 20, 1998 DRAFT" notation at the bottom of
the handout for this portion qf this meeting. The Board suggested that this be updated
prior to presentation to the City Commission. Further discussion.
MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARDILPA
MARCH 3. 1999 - REGULAR MEETING
PAGE30F4
"I'll make a recommendation to the City Commission that they adopt the
GreeneWay Interchange Zoning District and add to that, that they pay attention to
or consider allowing the Board of Adjustment to consider requests for placement,
very seriously". Motion by Bill Fernandez. Seconded by Marc Clinch. Discussion.
Vote: Rosanne Karr: Aye; Carl Stephens, Jr.: Aye; Tom Brown: Aye; Bill
Fernandez: Aye; Marc Clinch: Aye. Motion passed.
Chairman Brown spoke about a different issue, and added for the record, "If a
development goes up, and I was wondering how we were going to handle this - if a new
development of homes was to go up in the City, and they happened to be across the street
from a school; there's a very strong possibility that those people that are buying that
home, their children would go to another school". Discussion.
D. Discussion of Planning And Zoning Board/LP A Topic Chart (A
Chronological Review)
Suggestions from Board members regarding this Agenda item included:
· Add all Items discussed since January
. Page numbers
· Can the same information be sorted by date
. Revise Topic Chart monthly
Board Member Rosanne Karr asked Mr. Grimms about the approval date of the Final
EngineeringlFinal Development Plan for the Lake Jessup Property (aka St. John's
Landing)?
Mr. Grimms was also asked about adding information to this Topic Chart regarding the
designation of a "County Style Road" or "Rustic Residential Road".
Tape I/Side 2
In other business, Board Member Marc Clinch said that in reviewing the Board's records,
that the Board did not receive a final draft of the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR).
Board Member Clinch also asked when the next Comprehensive Plan is due, and if it is
being re-written. Discussion.
III. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
. Discussion with Attorney Robert Guthrie on the Draft Bylaws/Rules of
Procedure for the Planning & Zoning Board/LP A.
. Presentations by Staff (from different departments) on how changes have/are
being incorporating into the Comprehensive Plan.
. Approval of the Official Zoning Map (May 1999)/Update from Staff on the
current status of the computerized maps for the Commission Chambers.
MINUTES
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD/LPA
MARCH 3, 1999 - REGULAR MEETING
PAGE 4 OF 4
IV. ADJOURNMENT
Chairman Brown adjourned the meeting at 8:16 p.m.
Minutes respectfully submitted by: Andrea Lorenzo-Luaces, Deputy City Clerk
City of Winter Springs, Florida
APPROVED:
TOM BROWN, CHAIRMAN
PLANNING and ZONING BOARDILP A
DOCSlboards/planning/al11/minutesl030399.doc
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434
WINTER SPRINGS, FL .32708-2799
(407)327-1800
FOR:
x
SPECIAL EXCEPTION
VARIANCE
'CONDITIONAL USE
ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION
1. APPLICANT: 0E012bG MARKuJA~D PHONE roq{,,-{o{f I
ADDRESS: 7- 55 A RJJOL---D LAtJE) l}JIIJTc:12.. S P RII-Jc=.. 5
2 PURPOSE OF REQUEST: ~:&U IL-r ~ S'foRA<DE SUlLO! N c,.., (r/
-fROM. Sf DE 'PROP _ LI_\_ .
3. ATTACH A COPY OF THE PARCEL SURVEY.
4. ATTACH AN 11 x 17 MAP SHOWING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND
SURROUNDING PARCELS.
5.
ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIPTION.
6.
TAX PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
100 l2-TH ORLAf..J DO RANcttE S
LOT /2- B L-ocK ff
J
7. LOCATION
st reets) :
T~ Ie; is
8. PRESENT ZONING: R C 1-
FUTURE LAND USE: f<ES/DE/IJT/AL
By Signing below I understand that city of Winter Springs Officials
may enter upon my property to inspect that portion. as relates to
this application.'
(If the applicant is not the owner of the subject property, the
applicant must attach a letter of authorization signed by the
owner)
SEE. /lTTftCI/ED
~ETTER-
PERSONS ARE ADVISED THAT, IF THEY DECIDE TO APPEAL ANY DECISIONS
MADE AT THESE MEETINGS/HEARINGS, THEY WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE
PROCEEDINGS AND FOR SUCH PURPOSE, THEY WILL NEED TO INSURE THAT A
VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS HADE, AT THEIR COST, WHICH'
INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE
BASED, PER SECTION 286.0105, FLORIDA STATUTES
255 Amold Lane
Winter Springs, FL 32708
August 28, 1998
City Of Winter Springs
City Hall
Board of Adjustment Application - Zoning Department
1126 E. S.R. 434
Winter Springs, FL 32708
Dear Sirs:
We are requesting a variance to allow the erection of a storage shed in the yard of our home at 255 Arnold
Lane. We applied for a pennit but it was denied based on zoning requirements for RCI that specify a 20'
offset from the sides of the property. We feel that a variance to allow erection of the building 10' from the
property line should be properly grcUlted because:
1) The house does not currently comply with RCI zoning. It is a comer lot and tlle house is setback only
35' from tlle roads (not 50' as required in RCI). There was no variance applied for or granted when
the house was originally built. Tlus is clearly a "non-conforming" lot (see attached parcel survey.) As
such, we also request tlmt any fees for the variance be waived. On the advice of Mr. LeBlanc,
however, the $250 fee has been included witll tJus application plus $3 for each of the neighbors witJlin
150'.
2) RC I zoning is intended for and currently applied to tJlOse lots of 1 acre or more in tJle Ranchlands.
The property in question is a .6 acre lot similar to those of one acre or less immediately to the SOUtJl of
tlle property which are zoned RIAA. It is our understanding tJmt tJle zoning for this side of Amold
was in effect before tJle lots to tJle SOUtJl of here were zoned RIAA. Consequently tJle lots on tJlis side
of this one block were zoned the same as the otJler side of tJle street even tJlOugh tlley are substantially
smaller lots. If the city had zoned tJus lot as RIAA, tJlere would be a 10' setback applied for the
erection of a storage shed. We believe that tJlis is tJle proper way to go.
3) If RCI zoning is applied to this shed for this lot, tJle property value wiII be harmed because the shed
(when erected in compliance with RCI) will tJlen block the view of tJle lake from the master bedroom
and block vehicle access to the backyard and lake because the shed will then be sitting in tJle driveway.
We also request that the lot be "defined." That is, please rule on which of the property lines on tllis
irregular shaped lot would be considered; for zoning purposes, the "front", "back" and "sides". As you
know, this is necessary in order to apply the regulations.
The neighbors of the property are listed on the attached sheet.
Thank you for your prompt consideration of this request. We hope to have a response from your office as
soon as possible.
/
George Markward
~?(,-(Pl//
/~
ARriOLD LANE
- .- --'- -'--
50' AI_ ~ At.. C;J~~ t;IP "Ulf);
: 1,1"101
"'C' ",
NB9's4'sI'E 150.00'
,
:::;~':,n. -I ! f'\"
i:,f~~J:; : ~
.. II.'
'"
~
;-t.()(
LOT II
eLOCK t-i
\
---;i?'
I \
, "'.1' '.)~._.....--,---\-
., 1
, I'
. 01\
'"
I"
",
,.
~
J ~ '(.U, ~. ~
IlfS. . l~
, ,
\lMfuill
,
1,
j:
II
UJ
en
a
en
a
a
C)
cr3; ",Vl
:;;,',:,-___ "- LOT 11
.c . ,~-.......... BLOCK H //
~D ~ \. 1.0.'" ::> 'UlCoO -.'.
~. rcw. __ '(" 10.1 'J'
~ 0:) .rl~ 'I' '\ ~:-rc..
W~' / .... <.1'''" I
.v,~ / nCT\
. c"........ , \
. \ or,): ~ L:;r,'':'.
o,~'
.-+
.~,
....
c"....~
51' E 121. 72'
----'--', '.EGEH):
.... ......:l'OllD!
..ll '1Il4","
,,.."",:,..
CIA.I'.'''''lUo4
(. aWl''''''
, . . -0''-' rs ullJe{Oolll
...: '/IO.II'l~IIC'I'Ol1(~
..-----. :....;..~~
'( ."C,w1:rt CWI'1
.,;:,.~J(lctl'IJO."'"
( " . t:(JIClII(l( -...f)l'
l .' . no.. t'_ 'utA
'0 . tlUInJ(J
.(t.'"tIIl"~O,It'ft
..,...1-"......1
... . ..lllll.ct
l'I' 'VI
1.1.............
.,.........-.
Alk . CiL"1OI''''''
, . ~ . ,.,,, .. 1I0(
V'I., . tJ111'~
I.r.:.::::.a
"L~fI'..c
," ..-- JQ;
:' -1_","
:tit . COIWJ.
(.. 'U/fIlOII, I'
CD<. .(8oOI(t{ :
:.... . CJ::/IIQIIlI( ..fa I
1..1..I'(......",ill1~.~.......~'
IIG '~'U .
........ . -,- ::!J
H:i .: Sf PI ~
(^.......-I.....
.~~"
!( ,..; . . '.~'~ '.~,
t .~:~::.....~~~:..:...~..././
\ .-,
J'~
YPI: .......
l~'.
HB9
"
....
r'ORTH 0RLArV0 RAr'.a-€:' Q::CT 1 or~ (;,
PLAT OOOK 11. PAGE, 6.1-65.
,elf(: IO€I( ..., J( .all 1lC>UI.
<W:lIRltJll><S nlll II( 100' _ Do 'HI
",-Af hUl IU.' IC 'CJ..IlC ,- II'( JI\.e.I:
14l(~S rs hn S CD.Hn
""',( litiS u,(r . aCI VAl:O I: Itl'H
H€ $11NA1\.<< U(' Ill( O'llll""'" ll.4,I!(C
StAl rs ,rl(J:IO. l~C(W5IO p"~f~
A~""'MR'
PL~,~. or. SURVEr fOlt ~f.ORGE' CA IHY NAROARO
'LEGAl 'oEseRI~li~';' loi' 1?"-iiLOC)('itiioRi~:-0iU.1iloo:.R~It:hES SE~. IA. AS
Rt:COAOtD IN PLAI BOO~ 11 PAGf 31:32, PUllLlC R[CORDS:;' Sf"'HOLf
CDUNH. fLORIDA .
.-----.-.----r----.--.-.
ALSO CERTlflEO Ie: f10EI.I'1 hA!iOHAl ;i~:, IHSu;lAHCE ec I ,.., i
_ GECllCE ~ CAIHI N.l.RO=--T_ _.--L'::i1SS:. !:.~~_,
I~IS 15 10 eERI rFI ;HAI I HAVE REV 1 [lIED IHE :
fUX'..p IJ4SulllJ4Cr n...11"" lwl...p PA,.,q H\JM8Cn C(~~I' IC.!I'N !
___lll1l'-Qli~,( oAlm 'JJJn'ft'J:J ' 'I
A~"J O(l!RwIHfO IHA' IHI~-PflN,n.lV'l"'E'S'H 1 '.(l(!' n~"F' ,"': ,"> SlJIl.-.,
.. . .. .1 .. v-"'r" I I -[I IS 0'1 I~H.M 110'( 111)11"'" .
-lOOCI lONE .J.__LJ:, ., --,,---, '(C""(". ~1t1.};.)~'" ,. ,
-,,. ,...." .-, ,,( '~OR~'f<< ,& . 'is!''''': '
.~- . ~tl~l()IlI I U.l()S .. kbul".. e:,~-'I~ i
A AENGJNEERING A/-{() ~ '''0",'''' 1 f\[)OID" "'1"'1"( (<Xl!. *~.,,: 1
SURYEYING, INC. ~'!...Q'(I'------i IOS(CI~,~I/n"')1!~. SI~,I~ n :
.D1 l uc( ikc_rll.. AO SUI rr ,OJ .Mncs a.urD QI N .,.no lll( j ~(.GLC-<,,-~~ '
/lfJ:'tA~. ILC)qlO.. J.}16J ,. Lat u....ou; II..d ...~.1I'1 -......:...................oL -;........ I
~:~';~~.~~:b.6" f ~ I.....,.,._~' ,'l"H 4 CA~~l. p... ~. )J5~ :
.. ~. \..:.-ru l IO! ~.:, .....,.. 1."::1 J4' "1.41', I
-~- --
'""11--- "'
I', "!, ..,. \
)l' ~
ct
I
: ill
, ':::J
<.>, r:
~,
0 0..:>: ill
n,
a I >
0 ~.
l.Cl ':':1 4:
"
UJ ~~ I ill
On :rc-~ UJ
0 ':'i
to " -
a ~
D c:,
0 ~;5
Vl
IlJl
- ~
j '- :l''':
!To..\
~__.. __4
;
i ~ I t'DoI
r r.
r: ", . _.J
",.
I
t"
'.
J
~
I
,.
':
~A.:..~ :N\:t1. 4[ fl[:
- .:~._..:-.:.~-...::;
'0
.1
~
.,
~
~
"-
tz) 'i-
'-
.~~
i1 <u
. "Z 'S
. ~ ~
i:: ~
~ €
~.~
'\Y '\i
'\--... \.J
'-~
V ~ (.
~~~
\1
<ll
~
\)
~
,.
1st.'.
~ - .....
....".
:'.. ~
"
"!'. :."
Fox Glen at Chelsea Parc, Tuscawilla Phase 2 pg 1
pg 2
pg 3