HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998 02 09 Regular Item C-1
COMMISSION AGENDA
ITEM C-l
ADD ON
REGULAR X
CONSENT
INFORMATIONAL
February 09, 1998
Meeting
MGR
Authorizatio
REQUEST: The City Manager requesting the City Commission to approve clarifying language
of the Battle Ridge Development Agreement as decided by the City Commission.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this Agenda Item is to have the City Commission approve
inclusion of the clarifying language of the Battle Ridge Development agreement
listed herein as previously directed by the City Commission.
CONSIDERATIONS:
On January 26, 1998, the City Commission approved the Second Reading of
the Battle Ridge Development Agreement.
Relatedly, the Commission authorized the City Manager and City Attorney to
amend certain language of the agreement more properly, reflecting the desires of
the City Commission including comments offered by Seminole County and the
City of Oviedo.
FINDINGS:
None Required.
February 09, 1998
Regular Agenda Item C-l
Add On
Page 2
RECOMMENDA TIONS:
It is recommended that the City Commission approve the following clarifying
language in the Battle Ridge Development Agreement as follows:
Section 4-C (page 4) add: Following delineation of the jurisdictional
wetland lines, the parties acknowledge that the parcels in the preliminary
Development Plan are calculated in gross developable acres. . . .
Trail Language: add draft language provided by Seminole County staff
as follows: To ensure continuation of the Cross Seminole/Florida
National Scenic Trail, the developer shall coordinate with Seminole
County during the subdivision platting process to explore opportunities
that might exist to extend the trail through the Battle Ridge property,
Archaeological Study Section 7-1 (page 11): The developer shall
conduct a grid archeological survey of the developable site prior to
commencing construction of subdivision improvements.
Section G-l(a) (page 8): change 6,600 to 8,000 square feet.
Section E-4 (page 8): dedicate a ten (10) foot, rather than one (1) foot
preserve area on the eastern boundary of the Battle Ridge property to the
Battle Ridge Homeowners Association.
IMPLEMENT A TION:
These clarifying language changes will become effective upon approval by the
City Commission.
COMMISSION ACTION:
I,
)
)
)
\
FEB-09-1998 16:40
"
. TO:
FROM:
RE:
FILE 1#:
MESSAGE:
GRAY HARRIS ROBINSON PA
407 244 5690 P.01/19
GRAY, HARRIS & iOBINSON, P.A.
201 East Pine StJfeet, Suite 1200
Post Office Box 3068
.Orlando, FL 32802-3068
(407) 84\-8880
Fax: (407) 244-5690
FAX COVER SHEET
Carl Frischkorn
304-925-8725
Duncan Bowman
904-246-5002
Bob Guthrie
426-7767
Ron McLemore
327-6912
Frederick W. Leonhardt, Esquire
BATTLE RIDGE
55840-1
DATE:
3:57pm
February 9, 1998
TIME:
TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES: 18
including cover page.
NOTE:
If you do not receive all the pages. please call
Diana Kelly at extension 355 as soon as possible.
,
IMPORTANT:
THIS FACSIMILE MESSAGE CONTAINS ~EGALLY PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION IN1ENDED ONLY FOR TH~ I~DIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE. IF THE
READER OF THIS 'MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR THE AGENT
RESPONSIBLE ToiDELIVER IT TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT. YOU ARE HEREBY
NOTIFIED THAT ANY REVIEW, DISSEMINATION. DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS
COMMUNICATION IS PROHIBITED. IF THIS COMMUNICATION WAS RECEIVED IN ERROR.
pLEAS! IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY US BY TELEPHONE AND RETURN THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE
TO US AT THE ADDRESS ABOVE VIA THE: tJ. S. POS'1'AIt SERVICE . THANK YOU.
~)
)
)
FEB-09-1998 16:40
GRAY HARRIS ROBINSON PA
407 244 5690 P.02/19
ANNEXATION AND. PRE-DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this _ day of JamJury
Februarv, 1998, by and between the City of Winter Springs, Florida {herein referred to
as the "City"} and Battle Ridge Companies, Inc, (herein referred to as the "Owner").
w 1 T N E SSE T H:
WHEREAS, Owner owns property located in unincorporated Seminole County on
the east side of the State Road 417 (alkJa liThe GreeneWay") and north of State Road
434 and has filed an Application for Annexation of Owner's property into the City which
land is described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, and
WHEREAS, the City has encouraged Owner to annex into the City and
acknowledges the continuing permanent benefit which the City will receive by virtue of
annexing Owner's property and acquiring the right to provide municipal services to the
Property, and
WHEREAS, the City has determined that it is in the City's best interest to enter
into this Agreement to assure Owner of the future availability of adequate municipal
services, including sewer and water service, ~t such times and in such capacities as
may be necessary to allow Owner to develop the Property as set forth herein, and
WHEREAS, Owner's plans fo( development of the Property as ahigh-quality,
residential development have been deemed by the City to be of substantial economic
benefit to the City and its citizens. Owner's plans further include creating a conservation
area for the benefrt of preserving and protecting over two-thirds of the Property in its
natural state, which will be of substantial benefit to the City and its citizens, and
. WHEREAS, the City has determined that it is feasible and in the City's best
interest to extend into Owner's Property other municipal services, such as police
protection, fire protection, sewer and water service, trash and garbage removal, street
and storm drainage maintenance, and .
..
WHEREAS, in reasonable reliance upon the provision of water and sewer
service, municipal services, and other inducements to annex, Owner has filed said
Application for Annexation pursuant to 171.044, Florida Statutes, and
WHEREAS, Owner has filed an application with the City for a large scale
comprehensive plan amendment to change the Future. Land Use Map designation of the
. developable portion of the Owner's property designated on the Seminole County Future
Land Use Map as "Suburban Estates" (1 Dwelling. unit per acre) to the City's Future
Land Use Map designation of "Lower Density Residential" (1.1 to 3.5 Dwelling units per
acreland to change that portion ofthe Owner's property designated on the Seminole
1
FEB-09-1998 16:40
GRAY HARRIS ROBINSON PA
407 244 5690 P.03/19
" .
"J
County Future Land Use Map as "Conservation Overlay" to the City's Future Land Use
Map designation of "Conservation," and
WHEREAS, Owner has made an application to the City to rezone the
developable portion of Owner's property from Seminole County Zoning Map designation
A-1 "A9ncuttu~r" to the City's Zoning Map designation R-1A "One-Family Dwelling
District," and
WHEREAS, Owner is further willing to annex if the City agrees to cooperate in
the effort to amend its Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map to accommodate and
be consistent with the land uses pennitted for residential uses as described herein and
otherwise do what is reasonably necessary to rezone the property pursuant to these
land uses,and
)
WHEREAS, the first-reading of Ordinance 694 to annex the property was held on
January 12, 1998 and the second reading and public hearing of Ordinance 6.94 was
held on January 26, '1998, and
WHEREAS, the first reading of Ordinance 695 to adopt the large scale
comprehensive plan amendment (LG-CPA-1-95) changing the Future Land Use Map
designation of the property was held on January 12,1998 and the second reading and
public hearing of Ordinance 695 was held on JaAuary 2€) February 9, 1998, and
. WHEREAS, the first reading of Ordinance 696 changing the Zoning Map
. designation of the property was held on January 12, 1998 and the second reading and
public hearing of Ordinance 696 was held on January 26, 1998, and
WHEREAS, Owner and City believe that it is in the best interest of each party to
enable the Property to be developed substantially in accordance with the preliminary
development plan attached hereto as Exhibit "B" (the "Preliminary Development Plan")
and as further described herein, in accordance with Part II of Chapter 163, Florida
Statutes, the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development
Regulation Act (the "Act"), other appliCable Florida Law and the Charter and Code of
Ordinances of th~ City, and
WHEREAS, City and Owner hereby acknowledge and warrant to the other that
this Agreement and any future acts as required hereby are binding and enforceable on
the City and Owner in accordance with their terms, and
WHEREAS, the agreement of the City to provide inducements as set forth in this
Agreement (including land use approvals) and be bound by this Agreement, as well as
the City's assurance to the Owner that this Agreement is enforceable against the City
and that the City will not seek to thwart enforcement based on any claim of invalidity,
are all material inducements to the Owner to enter into this Agreement, and the Owner
)
2
FEB-09-1998 16:41
GRAY HARRIS ROBINSON PA
407 244 5690 P.04/19
)
would not voluntarily annex into the City or enter into this Agreement but for such
agreement and assurances by the City, and
WHEREAS, Owner has already made and will continue to make finanCial
commitments and has paid and will continue to pay substantial sums of money in
contemplation of the rezoning and. r~designation of land use to develop the Property,
and .
Accordingly, in consideration of mutual benefits, the public interest and other
good and valuable considerations, the receipt and sufficiency ,of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:
SECTION 1. RECITALS: EXHIBITS. The above recitations are true and
correct, are hereby incorporated herein by reference, and form a material part of this
Agreement. All exhibits to this Agreement are hereby deemed a pa'rt hereof. '
SECTION 2. AUTHORITY. This Agreement is entered into under the authority
of the Florida Constitution (including Article VIII, Section 2(b) thereof), the general
powers conferred upon municipalities by statute and otherwise (including Chapter 163
and 166, Florida Statutes), and the City's Charter.
SECTION 3. ANNEXATION AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT.
) A. Owner filed with the City, on August 2, 1995, an Application for
Annexation of the Property, which is conditioned upon the adoption of this Agreement.
The City initiated the process to accomplish the annexation in accordance with law.
B. Owner has filed with the City, on August 2, 1995, an Application for
Comprehensive Plan Am,endment in order to amend the City's Future Land Use Map to
include the Property and, provide for a future land use designation for the Property of
Lower Density Residential. The City initiated the process to accomplish the
Comprehensive Plan Amendment in accordance with law.
SECTION-4. DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY.,
A. The sizes, configurations and boundaries of the parcels and roadways
shown in the Preliminary Development Plan are for conceptual planning purpcses only
and shall not bind Owner to develop the Property in strict conformity with the
Preliminary Development Plan. In the event of any conflict between the terms of this
Agreement and the Preliminary Development Plan, this Agreement shall control.
B. The classification labels ahd descriptions pertaining to the parcels and the
locations of the lake/conservation/retention areas shown in the Preliminary
Development Plan are approximate. The exact location and configuration of said
)
'3
)
)
)
FEB-09-1998 16:41
GRAY HARRIS ROBINSON PA
407 244 5690 P.05/19
lake/conservationlretention areas shall be subject to change pursuant to regulations of
the appropriate county, state and federal permitting agencies. The parties acknowledge
that portions of the lake/conservation/retention areas shown in the Preliminary
Development Plan may'be identified as wetlands. Owner may use, develop or set aside,
isolated or marginal wetlands provided that the same is in compliance with all federal,
state, county, water management district and other applicable local regulations.
C. Following delineation of the jurisdictional wetland lines, the parties
acknowledge that the parcels in the Preliminary Development Plan are calculated in
gross developable acres and when developed will include, as necessary, storm water
retention and detention areas, recreation and open space, streets as well as the
lake/conservation/retention areas shown in the Preliminary Development Plan.
D. As designated in the Preliminary Development plan, the Property shall be
developed pursuant to the standards established for zoning categories consistent with
Lower Density Residential Land Use on the City's Future Land Use Map. The City will
support and approve a rezoning to R-1A One-Family Dwelling District allowing
residential use consistent with the Preliminary Development Plan, this Agreement, and
the City's Comprehensive Plan and the City's land Development Code.
E. The parties acknowledge that the Preliminary Development Plan shall be
the basis for Owner's development of the Property, subject to such modifications as
may be mutually agreed upon by the parties or are required by existing City ordinances.
The parties recognize that as the development process proceeds, it may be necessary
to amend the Preliminary Development Plan either (i) as may be mutually agreed upon
by the parties; or (ii) as permitted by Section 163.3233(2), Florida Statutes; or (Hi) as
required by currently existing City ordinances. The City shall do what is necessary and
within its power and authority to grant and allow development permits and approvals,
including, without limitation, platting, for the orderly development of the Property in
accordance with this Agreement.
F _ Owner represents to the City that Owner shall establish a homeowners'
association to ultimately own and maintain the entranceway amenities and other
commonly owne~ amenities;within the residential development on the Property.
, G. Owner or its authorized representative shall' submit to the City such
applications and other documentation and shall comply with such other procedures as
may be normally and customarily required by the City for comprehensive plan
amendments, rezoning, platting, site plans and other development approvals or permits.
Owner acknowledges and agrees that the City will not be responsible for any money
expended by Owner if the Comprehensive Plan Amendment is not approved by the
State.
4
.,)
)
)
/
FEB-09-199S 16:42
GRAY HARRIS ROBINSON PA
407 244 5690 P.06/19
" ,
H. Except as otherwise set forth herein, all development of the Property shall
be subject to compliance with current City ordinances, and with regulations of state,
local and federal agencies. .
SECTION 5. PROPERTY OWNERSHIP. Owner acknowledges and represents
to the City that Owner is the owner of the Property and that Owner is empowered to
enter into this Agreement. Owner further represents that nothing in this Agreement is
barred or prohibited by any other agreement between Owner and any governmental
agency or any third party.
SECTION 6. PROVISION OF PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES.
A. The'City represents that it has sufficient water capacity and pressure to
serve the Property. The City represents to Owner thaUhe City has a ten (10) inch water
line located approximately 1,200 feet from the western boundary of the Property at
State Road 434 and that Owner has the right to connect to such water line. All lines
and connections necessary to provide water facilities and services shall be provided
from the City's water line to the Property by Owner. Owner shall, upon completion of
construction and installation of such water line, deliver to the City a statement setting .
forth the cost of the construction and installation thereof. Subjectto approval of FDOT,
the City represents to Owner that all necessary rights-of-way to allow installation of all
lines and connections necessary to provide water facilities and services from the City's
water line to the Property as aforesaid are available.
B. The City represents that it has sufficient sewer capacity to serve the
Property. The City represents to Owner that the City has a six (6) inch sewer line
located approximately 2,200 feet from the western boundary of the. Property at State
Road 434 and that Owner has the right to connect to such sewer line. All lines and
connections to provide sanitary sewer services 'shall be provided from the City's sewer
line to the Property by Owner. Owner shall, upon completion of construction and
installation of such sewer line, deliver to the City a statement setting forth the cost of the
construction and installation thereof. Subject to approval of FOOT, the City represents
to Owner that all necessary rights-of-way to allow installation of all lines and
connections necessary to provide sewer facilities and services from the City's sewer line
to the Property as aforesaid are available. The City will take all steps necessary to
assure that sufficient capacity to serve the Property with sanitary sewer services shall
be available when needed for development by reserving for the Property sufficient
equivalent residential units C'ERU's") for the proposed project. The Owner shall be
required to pay annual guaranteed revenue charges for each ,ERU rNater and Waste
water Equivalent Residential Unit) beginning at the time of Florida Department of
Environmental Protection construction application, and continuing annually until
issuance of a construction certificate of project infrastructure by Florida Department of
Environmental Protection.
5
FEB-09-199S 16:43
GRAY HARRIS ROBINSON PA
407 244 5690 P.07/19
C. The City hereby agrees that Owner has the right to delay payment of
water and sewer connection fees until issuance of each building permit by the City for
construction of a single family residence on the Property. The City hereby represents
that the current service availability charge for sewer is $1,890.00 and the current service
availability charge for .water is $560.00. The Owner shall be required to pay the service
availability change applicable at the time ,said fees are assessed on a parcel or
property. '
')
D. The parties acknowledge and agree that it is not feasible to install
reclaimed water lines in this development; accordingly, the same shall not be required.
E. No septic tanks shall be allowed on the Property.
SECTION 7. CITY CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
It is hereby ORDERED AND RESOLVED by the City Commission of the City of
Winter Springs, Florida, that the property referred to as the BATTLE RIDGE
PROPERTY (hereinafter referred to as the "Property"), be annexed into the City,
designated on the Future Land Use Map and in the City's Comprehensive Plan as
"Lower Density Residential" and rezoned to R-1A subject to the following terms and
conditions:
)
A.
Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Effective Date.
The effective date of this Agreement shall be the date on which the
Comprehensive Plan Amendment (LG-CPA-1-95) is approved by the City.
This Agreement shall be recorded with the Recording Department of the
Clerk of Courts of Seminole County within ten (10) days after execution by .
the Mayor of the City.
B. Development of the Property.
)
1.
The Property shall be developed in accordance with
Comprehensive Plan Amendment (LG-CPA-1-95) which designates
the Property City Future Land Use Map "Lower Density Residential"
(1.1 to 3.5 Dwelling Units per acre). However, the actual net .---::::
developed density shall not exceed2.+i ~ units per acre.
2.
The property shall be developed as a residential community with
preservation of the wetlands portion of the Property in a non-
developed natural state. The uplands portion of the Property shall
be developed as a residential community in accordance with the
requirements in Chapter 20 Article III, Division 4, R-1A One Family
Dwelling District, and Chapter 9 of the Land Development .
Re'gulations, Winter Springs City Code.
6
FEB-09-1998 16:43
GRAY HARRIS ROBINSON PA
407 244 5690 P.08/19
') C. Wetlands.
1. Any eXisting wetlands or other areas which are in the jurisdiction of
the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), St.
Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD), or the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) shall be subject to the applicable
rules and regulations of those respective agencies.
2. Following final wetlands boundary determination and platting, but
within one year of this Agreement, the Owner of the Property shall
convey, at no cost to the Grantee, the wetlands portion of the
Property to a responsible public or private non-profit environmental
agency reasonably acceptable to the City. Pursuant to City Code,
all wetlands shall be delineated according to FDEP; SJRWMD, and
ACOE jurisdictional lines.
3. To further protect the adjacent wetlands, Developer agrees to
design its stoimwater runoff and retention system for the uplands
developable portion of the project in accordance with Outstanding
. Florida Water (OFW) design criteria as established by Florida
Department of Environmental Protection and the St. Johns River
Water Management District.
) 4. Property will be developed in a manner to avoid any negative
impacts on any endangered plant or animal species. Further, no
construction shall be permitted within the one hundred (100) year
flood plain line as most recently established for this property.
D. Fire and Police Public Safety Facilities Impact Fees.
Applicants for building permits within the Property shall comply with the
City Impact Fee Ordinances, as they may from time to time be amended,
imposing impact fees for fire and police pUblic safety facilities.
.0
E. Transportation,
1,
Applicants for building permits within the Property shall comply with
the City Road Impact Fee Ordinance, as it may from time to time be
amended, imposing impacts fees for transportation improvements,
2.
The costs of all street signs and traffic control signs and devices
located within the Property, shall be borne by the Owner or
Developer.
)
7
FEB-09-1998 16:43
GRAY HARRIS ROBINSON PA
407 244 5690 P.09/19
)
3.
The Owner or Developer agrees to improve the State Road 434
project entry, as part of required installations of subdivision
improvements required by the City Code on the Property, to allow
two (2) outbound and one (1) inbound entry movements,
acceleration and deceleration lanes along State Road 434,
provided these improvements are allowed by Florida Department of
Transportation.
4, The Owner will design its internal road network to preclude
connection to adjacent properties to the east. To further assure
that the road system is not connected to future developments to the
east, Developer will dedicate on the plat or by separate recorded nL.----
instrument eRe ten foot of property on the east property line of ..dQ.
Owner's developable property to the project's homeowner's
association as aA eAiJlireAFFlcAt:l1 ! preserve area. ~ .
F. Wall. .
The Owner or Developer of the Property shall install a six (6) foot masonry
wall on that portion of the Property separating any actual residential units
from proposed commercial properties along the north side of State Road
434.
)
G.
Building Restrictions.
The building restrictions shall be those found in the R-1A Single Family
Dwelling District, Chapter 20, Article III, Division 4 of the Code of
Ordinances of the City. They are:
1. Residential Areas:
Minimum lot size of residential sites within the Property shall ? ~_
be eight thousand (8,000) square feet with a minimum lot ~
width of seventy five (75) feet measured at the front building
line. The maximum number of lots shall be one hundred and
ten (11 O).
a.
b. Building setbacks shall be:
Front: 25 feet
Side: 7.5 feet
Rear: 25 feet
)
8
FEB-09-1998 16:44
GRAY HARRIS ROBINSON PA
407 244 5690 P.10/19
')
Comer lots: On comer lots, the front line setback of twenty-
five (25) feet or more must be maintained, but
a fifteen (15) foot sideline setback will be
permitted on the street sideline. provided the
comer lotfaces the same way as all other lots
in the block. If the building faces the long
dimension of the lot .or where comer lots face a .
different thoroughfare than other lots in the
block, the twenty-five (25) foot or greater
setback must be maintained from both
thoroughfares.
c. Lot coverage_
Forty (40%) percent of the lot area is the maximum which
. may be covered by the principal and accessory buildings or
structures located thereon in the R-1A One Family Dwelling
District.
)
d. Building height.
No building or structure shall exceed thirty-five (35) feet in
height.
e.
Residential floor area.
The minimum heated/air conditioned floor areas shall be
1,800 square feet.
2. Non-residential Area.
a. The non-residential area of the Property shall comprise the
w~tland areas following final boundary determination and
platting. it is the intent of the Owner of the Property that no
development occur within the wetland areas_
b. Following final boundary detennination and platting, all
wetlands shall be delineated according to FDEP. SJRWMD.
and ACOE. Wetlands shall mean those areas established
as jurisdictional by these agencies.
3. Open space.
All areas lying outside primary and ac~ssory buildings will be
counted toward open space requirements, including entranceways,
)
9
FEB-09-199S 16:44
..\
)
/
4.
)
)
GRAY HARRIS ROBINSON PA
407 244 5690 P.11/19
stormwater management areas, yards, lot landscaped areas, and
easements.
Development plans.
a.
For the duration of this agreement, except as otherwise
provided for herein, all development plans and standards
shall meet the regulations and policies of the City in effect at
the time.of execution of this Agreement.
b.
Where there may be a conflict between this Agreement and
the City development regulations, this Agreement shall
prevail.
c.
Developer acknowledges its obligation to develop/construct
all improvements on said property in accordance with all
applicable City codes modified pursuant to State of Florida
Statute 163.3233 and Feelerallaws as they may from time to
time be amended unless specifically modified herein.
d.
Parks and recreation.
No on-site park or recreation facilities will be required of this
development. The developer is required to pay a fee-in-Iieu
per Policy 1 of Objective E in the Open Space and
Recreation Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan.
The fee-in-Iieu will be established by the Parks and
Recreation Director.
e. Water and Sewer.
i.
The City sha!1 provide potable water service to the
Property. The Owner or Developer will pay for the
extension of trunk lines to the buildable portion of the
Property and pay other customary costs necessary or
required in connection with such service.
ii.
The sizing of the trunk line shall be sufficient only to
provide water service to the buildable portion of the
Property and to no other surrounding properties.
iii.
The City shall provide central sanitary sewer
collection and treatment service to the Property. The
Owner or Developer will pay for the extension of trunk
10
)
)
)
FEB-09-1998 16:44
GRAY HARRIS ROBINSON PA
407 244 5690 P.12/19
lines to the buildable portion of the Property and pay
other customary costs necessary or required in
connection with such service.
IV.
The sizing of the trunk line shall be sufficient only to
provide central sanitary sewer collection service to
the buildable portion of the Property and to no other
surrounding properties.
5. Homeowners Association.
A mandatory homeowners association will be formed to provide a
responsible entity to maintain all common areas.
6. The Developer shall make a good faith effort to have the retail
value ofthe completed homes and lots to be in the $180,000 and
higher price range. .
H. The Developer shall make a good faith effort to have the Florida Audubon
Society designate this project as environmentally responsible.
I.
The Developer shall conduct all a arid archeological survey of the / --'
~
developable site prior to commaAoame!At 9f commencina construction of
the subdivision improvements.
J.
=
To ensure continuation of the Cross SeminolelFlorida National
Scenic Trail. the Developer shall coordinate with Seminole County k
durina the subdivision plattina process to explore opportunities that
might exist to extend the trail throuqh the Property.
SECTION 8. PERIOD OF EFFECTIVENESS AND COMPLIANCE DATE.
A. This Agreement shall take effect upon City Commission approval of the
CQIllprehensive Plan Amendment (LG-CPA-1-95) and shall remain in
effect for a period of ten (10) years from the date of execution.
B. . This Development Agreement shall be binding upon all successors in
interest to the parties of the Agreement.
C. The effective date this Agreement may be extended upon request of the
Owner or Developer and City Commission approval.
SECTION 9. LAND USE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION
APPROVALS. The development of the project must comply with the conditions of the
11
~)
)
)
FEB-09-1998 16:45
GRAY HARRIS ROBINSON PA
407 244 5690 P.13/19
i.
Agreement. In the event a development requirement, permit, condition, term or
restriction is not addressed in. this Agreement, the development will comply with the
zoning ordinance, subdivision regulations, and other applicable land development codes
in effect as of the adoption of this Agreement.
SECTION 10. CONSISTENCY. The City finds this Agreement and its terms and
, conditions consistent with the City's Comprehe'nsive Plan.
SECTION 11. REMEDIES. The developer agrees that the only remedy for the
Owner in the event the Owner asserts the City has breached this agreement is an
acti9n for injunctive relief in the Circuit Court of Seminole County, Florida. Owner shall
have no right to monetary damages or attorney's fees in the event the City breached
this agreement. -
SECTION 12. DUE DILIGENCE. The City and Owner further covenant that they
shall immediately commence all reasonable actions necessary to fulfill their obligations
hereunder and shall diligently pursue the same throughout the existence of this
Agreement.
SECTION 13. ASSIGNMENT. The parties recognize and acknowledge that
Owner may engage one or more developers or builders, other than Owner, to effect the
development of the Property, including the sale of all or portions of the Property to such
developers or builders. Upon recordation of this Agreement in the Public Records of
Seminole County, Florida, as hereafter provided, successor builders or developers shall
be bound by the terms hereof.
SECTION 14. MISCELLANEOUS.
A. EntireAgreement. This Agreement sets forth all of the covenants,
agreements and conditions between the parties hereto, and supersedes all prior and
contemporaneous ' agreements, understandings, ,inducements or conditions, express or
implied, oral or written, except as herein contained.'
, B. Pronouns. All pronouns and any variations thereof shall be deemed to
refer to the masculine, feminine and neuter, singular or plural, as the identity of the party
or parties, successors or assigns may require.
C. Countercarts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall together
constitute one in the same instrument. '
D. Governina Law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with
the laws of the State of Florida.
12
FEB-09-1998 16:45
GRAY HARRIS ROBINSON PA
407 244 5690 P.14/19
')
E. Severabili~. If one or more provisions contained in this Agreement shall,
for any reason, be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect. such
invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision hereof and this
Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had
not been contained herein. '
F. Contraction. In the event the City fails 'to adopt an amendment to the
Future Land Use Map of the City's Comprehensive Plan and to the City's zoning map
designating the Property as described herein or the City fails to implement any of the
conditions set forth herein, Owner shall have the right to deliver a notice to the City
requesting a deannexation and contraction of the Property which the City shall have the
absolute obligation to implement.
G. Notice. Any notice to be given in accordance with this Agreement shall
be in writing and shall be sent by hand delivery, overnight mail, or certified mail,retum
receipt requested, to the party being noticed at the following addresses:
AS TO CITY:
City of Winter Springs. Florida
1126 East State Road 434
Winter Springs, Florida 32708-2799
A TTN: City Manager
)
COpy TO:
City of Winter Springs, Florida
1126 East State Road 434
Winter Springs. Florida 32708-2799
ATTN: City Clerk
AS TO OWNER:
Carl Frischkom, President
Battle Ridge Companies, Inc.
1000 RiVer East Drive
Belle, West Virginia 25015
COpy TO: Frederick W. Leonhardt, Esq.
Gray. Harris & Robinson, P.A.
201 East Pine Street
Suite 1200
Orlando, Florida 32802-3068
/ '
SECTION 15. DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS. Owner shall have the right to use and
develop the Property as described in this Agreement. Furthermore, Owner does not
waive any right to use or develop the Property arising under the common law or the
laws of the State of Florida.
)
13
')
)
\
j
FEB-09-1998 16:46
GRAY HARRIS ROBINSON PA
407 244 5690 P.15/19
This agreement is subject to provisi~ns of Florida Statute 163.3235, and 163.3241
providing for periodic review, and modification or revocation of a development
agreement to comply with subsequently enacted state and federal law. The
Development Agreement is also subject to Florida Statute 163.3233 regarding the local
laws and policies governing a development agreement.
ADOPTED by the City of Winter Springs this _ day of January Februarv, 1998.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Owner and the City have executed this Agreement as of
the day and year approved by the City,
B~TTLE RIDGE COMPANIES, INC.
By:
STATE OF
COUNlY OF
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of
Februarv, 1998, by who is personally known
to me or produced as identification.
Signature of Notary Public
AFFIX NOTARY STAMP
(Print Notary Name)
My Commission Expires:
Commission No.:
o Personally known. or
o Produced Identification
Type of Identification Produced
14
-)
)
)
FEB-09-1998 16:46
GRAY HRRRIS ROBINSON PA
407 244 5690 P.16/19
. .'
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
CITY CLERK
PAULP.PARTYKA,MAYOR
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF SEMINOLE
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _day of
Februarv, 1998, by who is personally known
to me or produced as identification.
Signature of Notary Public
AFFIX NOTARY STAMP
(Print Notary Name)
My Commission Expires:
Commission No.:
o Personally known, or
o Produced Identification
Type of Identification Produced
F,\USR\DKELLY\OEVS.RED
15
FEB-09-1998 16:46
GRAY HARRIS ROBINSON PA
407 244 5690 P,18/19
.....
'l'
Ii. If/ 6/ III //
LAND DESCRIPTION:
A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 21 SOUTH, RANGE 31 EAST, SEMINOLE
COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS.
BEGIN AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 21 SOUTH, RANGE 31 EAST,
SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA: THENCE RUN SOUTH 88'40'53" WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE
OF SAID SECTION 4. A DISTANCE OF 5407.95 FEET: THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTH LINE, RUN
SOU TH 00'17'58" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 898.74 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE EASTERN BELTWAY; THENCE, ALONG THE SAID NORTHEASTERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5) COURSES: RUN SOUTH 2€'08'45" EAST, A
DISTANCE OF 173,24 FEET, TO A POINT ON A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING
A RADIUS OF 5649.58 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH' 28"17'35" EAST; THENCE RUN
SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
04'17'40" FOR AN ARC DISTANCE 42.3.45 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE, LEAVING SAID CURVE
RUN SOUTH 30'26'25" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 95.07 FEET, TO A POINT ON A CURVE CONCAVE
SOUTHWESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 7737.43 FEET AND A CHORD BEJ\RING OF SOUTH
29'53'21" EAST; THENCE RUN SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH
A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03"22'34" FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 455.94 FEET, TO THE POINT OF
'):OMPOUND CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 7743.44
"FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 2S"18'27" EAST; THENCE RUN SOUTHEASTERLY
ALONG THE ARC OF' SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03"31'40" FOR AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 476.79 FEET TO A POINT: THENCE, LEAVING SAID CURVE AND SAID
NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT~OF-WAY. RUN NORTH 89'Sl'S3~ EAST, A DISTANCE OF 606,29 FEET;
THENCE RUN SOUTH 00"17'44" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH
LINE OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF SAID SECTION 4; THENCE RUN NORTH 89"S' '53" EAST, ALONG
SAID SOUTH LINE. A DISTANCE OF 3070,77 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST
1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION
4; THENCE RUN SOUTH OO"07'42M WEST, ALONG THE SAID WEST LINE. A DISTANCE OF 648.41
FEET, TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD 434: THENCE RUN
SOUTH 89"38'50" EAST, ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE. A DISTANCE OF 331.84
FEET. TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE I.JORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE
SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 4; THENCE, LEAVING SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, RUN
NORTH 00'02'02" WEST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 319.03 FEET, TO A POINT
ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF'
THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECnON 4: THENCE RUN NORTH 89'50'13" EAST, ALONG SAID
SOUTH LINE. A DISTANCE OF 661.88 FEET. TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST
1/4' OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 4; THENCE RUN NORTH
00"21'31" WEST. ALONG THE SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 306.88 FEET; THENCE, LEAVING
SAID EAST LINE, RUN SOUTH 89'51'53" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH
00"21'.31" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH
1/2 OF SAID SECTION 4: THENCE RUN NORTH 89"51'53" EAST, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE. A
DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET TO THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 4; THENCE RUN NORTH
''0'29'5'" WEST, ALONG THE EAST. LINE OF THE NORiHEAST 1/4 OF SAle SECTION 4. A
ASTANCE OF 2473.71 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID LANDS LYING IN SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND CONTAINING 296.97 ACRES MORE OR
LESS.
CT\
~
"-
CT\
~
a..
I
IS) , ~
CT\
\.0
If)
V
V
N
['-
IS)
v
II --t..
If
a:
a..
z
o
Ul
Z
.....
III
o
0:::
Ul
.....
0:::
0:::
a:
I
>-
a:
0:::
C)
Exbibit B
Total Upland Area
Isolated Wetlands
Other .Impacted Wetlands
Total Area
Density
39.39 Acres
1. 80 Acres
] .77 Acres
42.96 Acres
2.56 dulac
-Upland Area includes 2.39 Acres
in the 100 year flood plain
i?
['-
V
\.0
~
BATTLE ".RIDGE
lANUARY J6. W9ll
J'OB N\I'MIlER 1m
ro
CT\
1 I
CT\ I
IS)I Ble e L OOPlllllL'\'4H'1S. lilt.
~ .. .."... ~
ffi - --.---
LL ~.~._--...... .........._ . .......
-
..--...
o
GilAI'm: 3I:AU:
~~=.. -
.......,
I..".. ,.
""~
/-'\
CT\
~
a..
-l
a:
I-
o
I-
TO: Mayor and Commissioners
FROM: City Manager d I,AA.,
SUBJECT: Battle Ridge
DATE: February 9, 1998
On Monday February 2, 1998, Mayor Partyka and I attended a meeting with Oviedo Council
Chairman Dallari and Oviedo City Manager Gene Willifred at County Commissioner Randy Morris'
Office. County Planner Tony Matthews and County Attorney Lonnie Grout, were present. The
meeting was called by Commissioner Morris to attempt to resolve differences between the County,
Oviedo and Winter Springs over the Battle Ridge annexation. After reviewing several issues it was
agreed that a second meeting would be held at Winter Springs with Staff to include the County
Attorney and City Attorney Bob Guthrie to work out remaining issues.
The following actions are recommended in response to prior direction of the Commission and the
above referenced meetings this week with Seminole County and Oviedo Officials.
I. Agenda Item "C" - Battle Ridge Rezoning
It is the recommendation of Staff that the effective date of Ordinance 696 providing
the rezoning of Battle Ridge Properties to be consistent with the adoption of the
future Battle Ridge Plan Amendment Ordinance stipulating the jurisdictional wetlands
of the Battle Ridge property on the Future Land Use Map to be "Conservation" in
lieu of Low Density Residential R-1A.
D. Agenda Add-On Item C.t - Battle Ridge Development Agreement
This item is a result of direction provided by Staff at the prior Commission meeting.
Staff is recommending that the Commission review and approve the clarifYing
language directed by the Commission listed below.
ill. Agenda Add-On Item C.2 - Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Seminole County and Oviedo desire the City to create a "Conservation" Underlying
Land Use category in the City's Comprehensive P.lan so that the Battle Ridge
.~ ,~'... .J
to be dedicated to a public or not for profit agency will be protected by the
Comprehensive Plan.
Staff has no problem with this proposal.
IV. Agenda Add-On Item C.3 - Annexation Plan Amendment
Seminole County and Oviedo desires the City to amend its Comprehensive Plan to
acknowledge the City's annexation policy in the area of Battle Ridge and the Black
Hammock.
Staff recommends the City Commission direct Staff to prepare a Comprehensive Plan
Amendment establishing its annexation policy for all that area of land lying east of the
Battle Ridge Property and north of State Road 434 and comments referred to as the
Black Hammock area.
v. Agenda Add-On Item C.4 - Joint Planning Area Map Amendment
The Commission directed Staff to prepare an Agenda item to amend the City's Joint
Planning Area Map moving the eastern boundary north of State Road 434 from
DeLeon Street to the eastern most boundary of the Battle Ridge Property consistent
with the County's Urban Service Line.
Staff is recommending approval of Resolution No. 838 amending the map as
directed.
t:: -.:--..~ !..
TO: Mayor and Commissioners
FROM: City Manager d t,V\,
SUBJECT: Battle Ridge
DATE: February 9, 1998
On Monday February 2, 1998, Mayor Partyka and I attended a meeting with Oviedo Council
Chainnan Dallari and Oviedo City Manager Gene Willifred at County Commissioner Randy Morris'
Office. County Planner Tony Matthews and County Attorney Lonnie Grout, were present. The
meeting was called by Commissioner Morris to attempt to resolve differences between the County,
Oviedo and Winter Springs over the Battle Ridge annexation. After reviewing several issues it was
agreed that a second meeting would be held at Winter Springs with Staff to include the County
Attorney and City Attorney Bob Guthrie to work out remaining issues.
The following actions are recommended in response to prior direction of the Commission and the
above referenced meetings this week with Seminole County and Oviedo Officials.
I. Agenda Item "c" - Battle Ridge Rezoning
It is the recommendation of Staff that the effective date of Ordinance 696 providing
the rezoning of Battle Ridge Properties to be consistent with the adoption of the
future Battle Ridge Plan Amendment Ordinance stipulating the jurisdictional wetlands
of the Battle Ridge property on the Future Land Use Map to be "Conservation" in
lieu of Low Density Residential R-IA.
II. Agenda Add-On Item C.! - Battle Ridge Development Agreement
This item is a result of direction provided by Staff at the prior Commission meeting.
Staff is recommending that the Commission review and approve the clarifYing
language directed by the Commission listed below.
ID. Agenda Add-On Item C.2 - Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Seminole County and Oviedo desire the City to create a "Conservation" Underlying
Land Use category in the City's Comprehensive Plan so that the Battle Ridge
\
~'1:0~4'
to be dedicated to a public or not for profit agency will be protected by the
Comprehensive Plan.
Staff has no problem with this proposal.
IV. Agenda Add-On Item C.3 - Annexation Plan Amendment
Seminole County and Oviedo desires the City to amend its Comprehensive Plan to
acknowledge the City's annexation policy in the area of Battle Ridge and the Black
Hammock.
Staff recommends the City Commission direct Staff to prepare a Comprehensive Plan
Amendment establishing its annexation policy for all that area of land lying east of the
Battle Ridge Property and north of State Road 434 and comments referred to as the
Black Hammock area.
v. Agenda Add-On Item C.4 - Joint Planning Area Map Amendment
The Commission direc:;ted Staff to prepare an Agenda item to amend the City's Joint
Planning Area Map moving the eastern boundary north of State Road 434 from
DeLeon Street to the eastern most boundary of the Battle Ridge Property consistent
with the County's Urban Service Line.
Staff is recommending approval of Resolution No. 838 amending the map as
directed.
TO:
City Commissioners and City Manager
FROM:
City Commissioner: Robert S. Miller
DATE:
9 February 1998
SUBJ:
Updatinq the City of Winter Sprinqs Comprehensive plan
Dated Apr i 1 27. 1992
Winter Springs twenty year Comprehensive plan for the years 1990
to 2010, approved six short years ago, ;s obsolete and urgently
;n need of updating ;n the key areas of population, traffic, land
use, conservation, housing and infrastructure. While not intended
to serve as strategic plan, our comprehensive plan in many
aspects resembles one, and our city is now being confronted with
explosive growth not anticipated when our comprehensive plan was
completed.
While we have many good projects in the works, such as our town
center, rails to trails, park modernization, Police enforcement
and new schools, am very concerned about other areas where we
no longer have a clear vision. For example; our 1992 plan laid
out conservation areas which we are now developing; development
is taking place in areas formerly designated as wetlands; we are
annexing land where many never thought we would; and our planned
future road network is obsolete and in need of strategic analysis
if many of our communities are to avoid ruin by cut-through traf-
fic and unwanted road expansion.
Our population of 1,161 in 1970, grew to 22,653 by 1990, and
28,000 today. We have no clear idea what our population could or
should be within the next five years and beyond, with the for-
thcoming buildout of SR 434 and its attendant frenzied growth
pressure, our future development now threatens to become chaotic.
Orlando for too long has been a nationwide laughingstock, known
as the city without a plan. Now that ours too is no longer cur-
rent, I do not want our city to be painted with the same brush.
In order not to be remiss in our responsibilities to our city, I
am therefore making a motion tonight that our Comprehensive Plan
be reaccomplished during 1998, and that while this is being done,
that a moratorium be placed against all future commercial and
residential development not already under contract. This will
provide this Commission with the time needed to reach a consensus.
on where we are going; should be going; and can go, before we
arr somewhere no one wants to be.
.....
,.
~
TO: City Manager
FROM:
City Commissioner, Robert S. Miller
DATE:.
9 February 1998
SUBJ:
Confrontinq our CitY-Wide Cut-Throuqh Crisis
In recent years cut-through traffic across our city has gradually
worsened. And while this problem has grown, I have noticed a
reticence on the part of city government to get a handle on this
question. Cut throughs, also known as "Zip-Through," has now
reached a crisis level and is annoying large numbers of our resi-
dents, needlessly stressing our neighborhoods, endangering our
children, and contributing to the decline of our tax base. All of
this is totally unacceptable.
Safety statistics show that of the 6,000 pedestrians run down and
killed by automobiles in our country last year, that 3,500 of
them were killed along our residential streets. Furthermore,
these statistics show that those hit by a car at 18 mph or below,
usually survived, while those hit at 30 mph or above, were almost
always killed. Vehicle speeds on most of our residential streets
already approach 25mph and we all know that many are pushing 30
-the speed at which our citizens have no chance if hit.
We are not the only city confronting this problem. Across the
United States cities like ours are declaring war on "Zip Through"
traffic, and searching for ways to undue the chaos created in the
1960's. Streets once designed to move only cars in and out of our
neighborhoods as quickly as possible are being redesigned today
to be more user friendly, so they can also be shared by pedes-
trians, bicycles and pets. We always thought bigger and faster
was better. These are no longer de rigueur. Now we must strive to
undo the concept in which engineers sought to transform every
street into a mass arterial roadway without regard to residents,
their quality of life, their safety, and their community cohe-
Slon.
The "Zip Through" problem now plagues our city and we must
urgently look to the welfare of all our citizens - not only the
automobile. Of particular concern to me right now are a couple of
our city's thoroughfares like Winter Springs Boulevard, Wade
Street, Hayes Road, Shore Road, Murphy Road, and Edgemon Road.
But there are others too. I want our city to immediately begin
undertaking a pro-active leadership role. in addressing this vital
community public safety issue. We must get out in front of this
problem, and do it now.
At present,
bends,
barriers,
humps and channels are being
JIll'
..
v .
"
installed by the hundreds of thousands in other towns, cities and
communities across our country. They are being installed to slow
down traffic flows. The devices vary in type, size and shape, and
are accomplishing their mission. Among these are Chicanes -for-
cing traffic into a zig zag pattern along streets; there are
Neckouts - sidewalks and curbing extending into the roadway at
intersections forcing drivers to slow down; Bulbouts - where
sidewalks jut into the road way -constricting it enough to force
traffic to slow down; Speed Tables - rising portions of the
roadway to force traffic to slow; Traffic Islands -at residential
intersections forcing cars to slow and go around them; and of
course there is the famous Speed hump. All of the above have
proven to most effectively slow traffic to between 15 - 25 miles
per.
I would like Winter Springs to immediately join the war against
cut-throughs and begin implementing the above devices into our
roadways. I would also like our city to begin incorporating these
devices into all new development areas so others will not have to
co nt this plague in future.
Robert S. Miller
CITY OF OVIEDO FLORIDA
400 ALEXANDRIA BOULEVARD · OVIEDO, FLORIDA 32765 · (407) 977-6000
V. EUGENE WILLIFORD, III
CITY MANAGER
February 9, 1998
The Honorable Paul P. Partyka
City of Winter Springs
1126 East S.R. 434
Winter Springs, FL 32708
Dear Mayor Partyka:
The Oviedo City Council at its February 2, 1998, meeting requested that I present to
the Winter Springs City Commission our continued concerns related to the Battle
Ridge item listed for the February 9, 1998, Winter Springs Agenda.
First, I would submit for the record information which is relevant to all the current
discussions:
- Exhibit 1 shows the City of Oviedo's Annexation Line and corresponding
Policy 1-1.3,10; this has already been incorporated into our Comprehensive
Plan and has been approved by the Florida Department of Community
Affairs without any Seminole County or specifically Black Hammock
objection. I have also submitted one complete Comprehensive Plan for your
use.
- Exhibit 2 is the North-South Corridor Study, Executive Summary Tier 1
Analysis Results and the existing concerns for future North-South Corridors.
- Exhibit 3 is the Memorandum from Traffic Planning and Design, Inc. dated
February 3, 1997, where MacKinley's Mill as an "upscale subdivision with
106 dwelling units" has a daily trip rate of 12,5 trips per dwelling unit.
BattleRidge, as presently approved with contingency, would be developed
similarly yet the factor for trips per dwelling unit utilized is 9.55.
Second, our concerns tonight are clouded by confusion and a very short time to
review the Add-ons, It is not evident at first glance whether the change to the
Comprehensive Plan Amendment as proposed by Add-on C-2 is to occur before the
transmittal of the Plan Amendment approved on January 26, 1998, with the
contingency of Item C being passed, Item C dated February 9, 1998, makes no such
stipulation and, in fact, rezones the entire property to R-1A. If you read the
Development Agreement closely (again the one approved on January 26, 1998, with
the contingency of Item C being passed), it states that the Land Use for the wetlands
is to be Conservation which, according to the agreement is consistent with the Winter
Springs Comprehensive Plan Amendment. No consistency exists currently between
the Land Use approved with rezoning contingency and the Development Agreement
approved with rezoning contingency.
Third, changes have been made to the development to decrease density, However,
merely saying that there will be no demand on Oviedo services or that there will be
fire service in close proximity within four or five years does not answer a very basic
premise. It appears that municipal services can best be provided by the City of
Oviedo. The closest fire station, for example, is the City of Oviedo Station 2 at
Broadway and Central. The Oviedo Police Department already have active patrols
in this area based upon our current municipal boundaries. No recreation facilities are
being required within the development which, again, will place an added burden on
our local parks. None of these services, save for medical transport charges, have user
fees attached; these services are solely funded through ad valorem taxes and other
revenues strictly associated with our City's population.
Although the City of Oviedo does not support the annexation of the Battle Ridge
property as it is currently approved, the other aspect related to annexation is the
mechanism by which no further annexation outside the Urban Service Line is to
occur, A joint planning area agreement after-the-fact does not protect the
surrounding environmentally sensitive areas; 10 foot of property on the east property
line, for instance, adds no real assurance that the consequences of the development
will not encroach into the surrounding areas if it were not strictly enforced in the plat
as a tract.
The land use as approved still designates the entire 296.96 Battle Ridge Property as
Lower Density Residential. In order to protect all the environmentally sensitive lands
it would be more consistent with recent Florida Department of Community Affairs
recommendations to designate these as Conservation. Even with the timing for the
transfer of ownership of wetlands now reading one (1) year, a description of the
environmentally sensitive lands and a corresponding Conservation land use now, not
as another amendment, would ensure that appropriate lands are transferred. Again,
this creates a question as to .wetlands protection.
Also our experience on the east side of Oviedo has been that further restriction is
necessary as to the protection of wetlands and the surrounding rural and conservation
land uses. The options for such protection include the use of one acre lots as
described in the Small Area Study or buffers of one hundred (100) feet with quarter
acre lots as a minimum requirement for a transitional land use, Lots in MacKinley's
Mill and nearby neighborhoods in the City of Oviedo are greater than the 8,000
square foot lot size; Battle Ridge would set a precedent for the area.
Fourth, the external circulation for the future Battle Ridge Residents can only impact
Oviedo's transportation system since the commercial attractions, schools, and
medical services are well within Oviedo's incorporated areas. Within the Annexation
and Pre-Development Agreement it states what each of our cities has experienced;
any required improvements on SR 434 must be allowed by FDOT. The Agreement
does not stipulate any reduction in units or any delay in the timing of construction
without these improvements. There appears to be no alternatives to the entrance on
SR 434, and with the trips to be generated by maximum development a reduction or
delay is critical where no improvements are approved.
The City of Oviedo is currently reviewing possible improvements to its transportation
network including solutions to cut through traffic problems; with the conflicting
traffic studies by the same transportation engineers (one for the Battle Ridge property
and one for a development in Oviedo) we recognize the need to address North-South
circulation created not only by Oviedo residents but also by residents in properties
surrounding Oviedo, If the Battle Ridge project continues, we will be requesting
participation by the City of Winter Springs in developing improvements
commensurate with the associated impact.
Fifth, the legal issues as to the adoption cannot be addressed without understanding
your action tonight. Enclosure D of Seminole County's letter dated February 9, 1998
recommends Option 1. The process itself would be less likely to meet challenge if
Option 1 were followed.
In summary, our concerns still relate to the impacts of the proposed development of
Battle Ridge property on our municipal services, our residents, our transportation
network, and the environmentally sensitive lands surrounding the property. If this
development were occurring adjacent to Winter Springs' existing larger lot
neighborhoods, would you approve the density as is being recommended by your
City Staff? How do you incorporate Battle Ridge into your City Center discussions
when your consultant has been quoted as not endorsing the annexation?
Discussions were begun on February 4, 1998. These need more time for resolution
of critical issues. Further discussion should commence before any official action is
taken. On behalf of the Oviedo City Council I am requesting that you deny
Ordinance No. 696 to rezone the 296.96 acre Battle Ridge Property.
cc: Winter Springs City Commission
Mayor Miriam Bruce
Oviedo City Council
x
:l
t r/t,b( f i
generated within the Planned Unit Development. Such commercial and
office activities shall serve a market oriented to retail and service demands
and needs of the surrounding neighborhood. Any allocation above a
minimum demand to serve residential/and uses within a residential planed
unit development shall be based on regional market demand. The burden
to demonstrate regional demand is placed on the applicant of the proposed
development, demonstrated by the developer in a study prepared by
professional economists, commercial realtors, or site location planners.
1-1.3.8 The City shall not increase the land use intensity of the active agricultural areas
along W. Mitchell Hammock Road until the interior portions of the City have been
urbanized.
1-1.3.9 (CPA 95-01; Ord. No. 936; Amended 5/15/95) In order to prevent the extension
of urban development into rural areas, the City shall recognize Lake Jessup as a natural
northern boundary to further annexation.
1-1.3.10 (CPA 96-1; Ord. No, 1004; Amended 12/16/96) (CPA 94-01; Ord. No. 913;
Amended 3/21/94): The City shall not annex any additional property to the north or east
of the annexation boundary established in Map 1-1 until the City and the County have
adopted the interlocal agreement (Policy 1.7) addressing land uses and services. Prior to
annexing any land, the City shall demonstrate that public facilities and services shall be
available consistent with adopted level of service standards, or must prepare a financially
feasible plan that demonstrates how any capacity deficiency shall be eliminated through
the Capital Improvement Element. Central sewer shall not be extended to unincorporated
areas north or east of the annexation line (as delineated in Map 1-1) that are designated
Rural, Suburban Estates, or Conservation on the Seminole County Land Use Map until an
interlocal agreement is established with Seminole County.
1-1.4. OBJECTIVE: To redevelop and upgrade substandard development and blighted
areas.
Measure: By 2010, all City streets providing access to more than ten homes and/or
businesses will be paved, and non-conforming situations will be reduced by 50%.
Policies:
1-1.4.1 The City will continue to enforce the Land Development Code provision requiring
"any substantial change in land use" (as defined in the Land Development Code) to meet
current development standards.
1 - 20
-J[~
It
~~
~
l
e
-
~
\:('0
~
~
r>.
o
~
~
~
:>
o
~
o
~
~
~
u
~
~
<
~
z
~ 0
I 0
~ co
~ z
-< 0
::s e::
<
:><:
~
z
z
-<
~
z
-
"C~
~ Z
OJ 0
bDe::
OJ <
~X
~
Z
Z
<
~
~
.--l
M
I
.--l
11
City of Oviedo
North-South Corridor Study
Prepared for:
City of Oviedo, Florida
Department of Planning & Zoning
August 29, 1997
tyh,'btT d-
Executive Summary
Tier 1 Analysis Results
Prepared by:
TRA1<f5EbRE
An SAlCCooy>ony
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . I
PROBLEM STATEMENT ...................................................... 3
TIER I EVALUATION MEASURES .............................................4
SYSTEMS ANALYSIS RESULTS ......................................,........ 6
Local vs. Non-Local Traffic. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
RECOMMENDATIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
CONSISTENCY WITH PROPOSED POLICY AMENDMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
SUMMARY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Figure 1
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Table 5
Table 6
Table 7
List of Figures
Existing Plus Committed Network and Alternatives. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2
List of Tables
Tier I Alternatives. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Impact on SR 434 Traffic Volwnes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
North-South Corridor Level of Service .. . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
North-South Corridor Environmental Level of Serivce , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Cut- Through Traffic. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
East-West Traffic Volumes foir Selected Roads. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Traffic Volumes for Road Improvements by Alternative .................. 18
Oviedo North-South Corridor Study
Tier I Analysis
Executive Summary
OVIEDO NORTH-SOUTH CORRIDOR STUDY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - TIER 1 ANAL YSIS RESULTS
INTRODUCTION
This executive summary presents the findings and recommendations from the Tier 1 analysis
of the Oviedo North-South Corridor Study. As described in the scope of services, the Tier 1 analysis
of potential corridors involves an inventory of transportation and land use conditions in the study
area, the development of evaluation measures, and an assessment of which potential north-south
corridor improvements is most effective in tenns of traffic access, roadway level of serVice and
reduction in cut-through traffic volumes.
This North-South Corridor Study is associated with the City of Oviedo's proposed policy
amendment (CPA 97-1; Ordinance No. 1021), which states that for any paved extension involving
Pine Avenue, Lake Jessup Avenue, Division Avenue or Lake Charm Drive, certain conditions
relating to traffic volumes must be met. These conditions are: (I) the traffic service at the
intersection of SR 434 and SR 426 is currently operating at an unacceptable level of service, or is
anticipated to operate at an unacceptable level of service within five years; (2) the extension of one
of the four roads will result ina majority of average daily trips remaining local; and (3) daily traffic
volumes will not exceed the road's adopted level of service standard. This study is intended to
quantify those factors to assist the city in reaching a decision regarding possible transportation
improvements in the city's northwest area.
This systems level analysis perfonned for the Tier I analysis entailed the modification and
calibration of the Orlando Urban Area Transportation Study (OUA TS) regional model specifically
for Oviedo and the study area. The study area generally confonns to an area bounded by the Central
Florida Greeneway toll road on the west, SR 434 on the north, Lake Charm on the east and Mitchell
Hammock Road on the south, although traffic and land development influences from outside this
area are considered in the analysis. The study area and alternatives considered are shown in Figure
1.
Oviedo North-South Corridor Study
Tier I Analysis
Executive Summary
EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED NETWORK AND ALTERNATIVES
-j i-----
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
. .
._.__r----u.
!
i
WEST MITCHELL HAMMOCK R9
!
i
1
I
I
i
r-----1
I : j
,__u_____ (
I
,
l
I
,
i
~_...J
I
r=L__~f
Figure 1
N Existing model network as
modified for this study
I
l
I
,
(
"......~---.
A Alternative
Note: Alternatives G and H are combinations
of A and Band Band C respectively
This analysis included detailing the model network to reflect the roadway system in the study
area for a 1995 base year condition and a forecasUanalysis year of 2005. Socioeconomic data,
including population, housing and employment were developed for the base year and forecast year
and allocated to the traffic analysis zones (T AZs) in the study area, as well as the general Oviedo
area. Efforts were made to ensure that the effect of the Marketplace at Oviedo Crossing mall and
recently approved projects or pending development proposals were incorporated into this data set.
Traffic counts were taken on the collector roads in the study area to compare model results. The
analysis examined year 2005 conditions rather than 2002 (five years from now) due to the ability to
more easily develop socioeconomic data and account for build-out of several developments on the
city's eastern side.
The Tier 1 analysis was conducted to screen the potential corridors for their effectiveness
against several evaluation criteria and the city's proposed policy for more detailed evaluation in Tier
2 of the study. Two alternatives are to be advanced from Tier I into the Tier 2 analysis. Tier 2 is
designed to specifically consider information such as conceptual alignments, right-of-way
availability and cost, construction cost, environmental impacts, pedestrian and bicycle safety and
mobility issues, neighborhood access and traffic compatibility concerns for the two selected
corridors. This executive summary presents the findings from the Tier 1 analysis, and discusses the
recommendation for the two corridor alternatives that should be further evaluated in Tier 2 of the
study.
PROBLEM STATEMENT
The purpose of the Oviedo North-South Corridor Study is to investigate the need for, and the
impacts of, establishing a more effective collector road network in the northwest part of the city.
The study is to explore potential connections of four north-south collector roads to SR 434 as a
means of providing additional travel alternatives to SR 434. With the rapid pace of commercial
development in and around Oviedo, and the constrained nature of the city's arterial street system,
increasing traffic on local streets in this area is expected to continue.
Oviedo North-South Corridor Study
Tier I Analysis
3
Executive Summary
The intersection of SR 434 and SR 426 is currently operating at what traffic engineers
consider to be an acceptable level of service in the afternoon rush hour. However, this operating
condition reflects local travel patterns that have developed over time from residents who seek to
avoid long queues at this intersection by using alternate routes. A traffic forecast of2005 conditions
made for this study indicates that this critical intersection will fail to meet an acceptable level of
service, with a LOS F condition. This will likely result in additional cut-through traffic on local
streets and collector roads as motorists seek to avoid this intersection.
The following sections describe the Tier 1 analysis of potential north-south corridors in
Oviedo to address traffic problems resulting from too much cut-through traffic in the study area and
the projected level of service deficiency at the SR 426/SR 434 intersection.
TIER 1 EVALUATION MEASURES
Figure 1 shows the corridors considered for the Tier 1 analysis. There were 12 initial
alternatives incorporating these corridors individually or in some combination for the 2005 horizon
year. Table 1 lists the alternatives tested under this analysis. Of the 12, four (Alternatives A, B, C
and D) evaluated the extensions of the four north-south roads specifically identified in the city's
proposed policy and which are the focus of this study (Pine Avenue, Lake Jessup Avenue, Division
Avenue and Lake Charm Drive),
The Tier 1 evaluation was based on three main factors: (1) the future volume impacts on the
constrained portions of SR 434/Central Avenue and the level of service at the intersection of SR 434
and SR 426; (2) the conventional level of service, environmental level of service, and future volumes
on Pine Avenue, Lake Jessup Avenue, Division Avenue and Lake Charm Drive, and (3) the
effectiveness of the alternatives in reducing cut-through volumes in the MacKinley's Mill and
Bentley Woods subdivisions. Traffic volumes on key east-west roads were also monitored for each
alternative to ensure that they remained at acceptable levels.
Oviedo North-South Corridor Study
Tier 1 Analysis
Executive Summary
4
Table 1
TIER 1 AL TERNA TIVES
Alternative A - Extend Pine Avenue to Palm Drive (and SR 434) as a two lane roadway. This
improvement is specifically addressed in the city's proposed policy amendment.
Alternative B - Extend Lake Jessup Avenue to SR 434 as a two lane roadway.
Alternative C - Extend Division Avenue north to Florida Avenue (to connect with SR 434) as a two
lane roadway. This improvement is specifically addressed in the city's proposed policy amendment.
In addition, Division A venue was evaluated with a four lane extension from CR 419 to Mitchell
Hammock Road.
Alternative D - Extend Lake Charm Drive north to Florida Avenue as a two lane roadway. This
aiternative also considered a southern connection of Lake Chann Drive to CR 419. This improvement
is addressed in the city's proposed policy amendment.
Alternative E - This is the "kitchen sink" alternative, which included all improvement concepts. It was
created to facilitate network coding of alternatives and was not tested.
Alternative F - Extend Lake Jessup Avenue to SR 434 as a two lane roadway; extend Franklin Street
west to Lake Jessup A venue and east to Lockwood Boulevard.
Alternative G (combination of Alternatives A and B) - Extend Pine Avenue to Palm Drive (and SR
434) as a two lane roadway and Extend Lake Jessup Avenue to SR 434 as a two lane roadway.
Alternative H (combination of Alternatives B and C) - Extend Lake Jessup Avenue to SR 434; extend
Division Avenue north to Florida Avenue (to connect with SR 434) as a two lane roadway, and extend
Division Avenue south from CR 419 to Mitchell Hammock Road as a four lane roadway.
Alternative I - Widen SR 434 (Central Avenue) to four lanes from the Greeneway interchange to
Mitchell Hammock Road. This was tested as a "what if' scenario to determine what might be the result
of removing the two lane constraint.
Alternative J - Extend Lake Jessup Avenue to SR 434 as a two lane roadway; realign Aulin Avenue
with Oviedo Crossing Terrace at SR 426; and connect Clarke Street with SR 426.
Alternative K - Extend Pine Avenue to Palm Drive (and SR 434) as a two lane roadway and widen
SR 426 to four lanes from Mitchell Hammock Road to Pine A venue.
Alternative L - Extend Pine Avenue to Palm Drive (and SR 434) as a two lane roadway and
upgrade/extend Mission Road to Field Street.
Alternative M -Extend Lake Jessup Avenue to SR 434 as a two lane roadway and extend Magnolia
Street east to SR 426.
SYSTEMS ANALYSIS RESULTS
Tables 2 through 7 (appended to this document) summarize the findings from this analysis.
The segment volumes shown in the tables are the weighted average of the link volumes in the model
based on length. Below is a summary of the analysis in terms of each of the specified criteria.
Table 2 shows the effect of the various alternatives on the constrained portions of SR
434/Central A venue from the Greeneway interchange to Mitchell Hammock Road. Table 3 shows
the volumes under each alternative for the four north-south collector roads, and the resulting level
of service (LOS), based on Oviedo's adopted LOS standard, which is LOS D for collector roads.
Table 4 shows the environmental level of service (ELOS) analysis results on the four roads. The
environmental level of service criteria was developed by TransCore during a previous study in
Maitland. It is designed to evaluate the effect of traffic on adjacent land uses, rather than on the
capacity of the road, as is evaluated by conventional level of service standards. This is not an
adopted standard by Oviedo, but it was used for additional guidance in this study. An analysis of
the ELOS results indicates that almost all alternatives result in a decreased level of service condition
for the neighbors of the roads, suggesting that traffic calming devices may be necessary to control
speeds and mitigate volumes for adjacent property owners. Table 5 presents the findings from the
cut-through traffic analysis. Table 6 shows the projected volumes on several east-west roads in the
study area. Table 7 shows the resulting volumes on several roads that are included in some of the
alternatives.
As shown in the tables, to varying degrees, each alternative helps alleviate traffic volwne on
the SR 434 conidor. However, none of the alternatives makes a significant improvement on the SR
434/SR 426 intersection, with the exception of Alternatives C and H, which improve the 2005
condition of the intersection to LOS E (the adopted standard). These alternatives - both include the
Division Avenue extension - are most effective because they assume that Division is also connected
south to Mitchell Hammock Road (and Alexandria Boulevard), thus providing relief to the
northbound and southbound approaches to the SR 434/SR 426 intersection. It should be noted that
while most of the alternatives have little positive impact on this intersection when tested
Oviedo North-South Corridor Study
Tier 1 Analysis
Executive Summary
6
individually, providing multiple travel alternatives for traffic to bypass this intersection would likely
have a positive impact. Thus, extending all four north-south roads and providing additional east-
west connections would improve the intersection's operating condition. This is consistent with the
city's comprehensive policy plan to create additional road extensions.
The impact of the alternatives on cut-through traffic focused on the MacKinley's Mill
subdivision. A 1997 analysis of cut-through traffic performed in conjunction with the proposed
Texaco Star Mart service station on SR 434 identified about 40 percent of traffic volume in the
subdivision was non-local cut-through traffic. The forecast for 2005 anticipates that percentage
increasing to about 55 percent. The refined computer model was used to identify shifts in non-local
traffic as a result of various connections under the alternatives.
Alternatives A (pine Avenue alone), G, K and L (all involving Pine Avenue) virtually
eliminate cut-through traffic in MacKinley's Mill subdivision. Alternatives C (Division Avenue)
and H (Lake Jessup and Division Avenue) are also effective at reducing non-local traffic through
MacKinley's Mill, though they are somewhat less effective. Cut-through traffic in the Bentley
Woods subdivision is not a significant issue as the traffic is local in nature.
Local vs. Non-Local Traffic
In response to the city's proposed policy, it was necessary to determine whether non-local
traffic would increase in proportion to local traffic on the four north-south collector roads. To
estimate local and non-local traffic, the study area was split into two halves - with Central A venue
as the dividing line between the two. The methodology included adding up the traffic volume
originating from or destined to the land uses adjacent to Pine A venue and Lake Jessup A venue in
the western half, and the same summation was performed for the development adjacent to Division
Avenue and Lake Charm Drive on the eastern half. The projected volume on the two roads on each
side of Central A venue was then added. Two roads were used because land uses in each half of the
study area have access to both north-south roads, making it difficult to focus exclusively on one road
for this analysis.
Oviedo North-South Corridor Study
Tier I Analysis
Executive Summary
7
"Local" traffic is defined as the projected traffic volume directly associated with land uses
having access to either of the two roads under consideration. The proportion of local traffic in an
area is determined by dividing the amount of projected local traffic by the projected total volume on
the two roads.
For the Pine A venue extension alternative, the local traffic analysis indicates that about 64
percent of the traffic would be local in nature. In other words, almost two-thirds of the combined
volume on Pine A venue and Lake Jessup A venue is directly oriented to development adjacent to
those roads. Conversely, about 36 percent of the traffic would use either of those roads to travel
between SR 434 and SR 426. Alternative B, Lake Jessup Avenue, results in 67 percent local traffic.
The extension of Division Avenue - Alternative C - results in 61 percent of the traffic being local.
Alternative D - Lake Charm Drive - has 82 percent local traffic. As the results of this analysis
indicate, all four north-south corridors meet the criteria of the proposed policy amendment when
extended. A comparison was not drawn with the percentages under the "no-build" scenario.
RECOMMENDATIONS
This analysis indicates that Alternative C (Division Street extension) and Alternative A (Pine
A venue extension) are the preferred alternatives among those considered These two alternatives
make the most sense from both access and traffic volume perspectives. Alternative C best addresses
the entire length of the constrained sections of SR 434/Central A venue and provides improved access
to the city's traditional downtown. It also has the benefit of maintaining the existing level of service
at the intersection of SR 434/SR 426 in 2005. By itself, Alternative C also improves the cut-through
situation in MacKinley's Mill appreciably, though not as well as other alternatives. The Division
Avenue alternative improves the cut-through situation to a certain extent because it frees up
additional capacity on SR 434, thus reducing the incentive for motorists to avoid delays at the SR
434/SR 426 intersection. Because some travelers are destined to Oviedo High School and the mall,
it does not eliminate the cut-through problem in MacKinley's Mill.
Oviedo North-South Corridor Study
Tier I Analysis
Executive Summary
8
Due to the assumption about the four-lane southern extension of Division Avenue between
Broadway Street and Mitchell Hammock Road, this alternative best addresses system-wide
transportation issues in and around the city's traditional downtown area. As a result, it will have a
more beneficial long term impact on the city's traffic circulation needs by itself than will other
alternatives considered.
Alternative A (Pine Avenue) is the most effective alternative in reducing cut-through traffic
in MacKinley's Mill, and helps reduce traffic on the constrained portions ofSR 434 north ofSR 426.
However, as with Lake Jessup Avenue and Lake Charm Drive, Pine Avenue does not appear to have
much of an effect on the operating condition of the SR 434/SR 426 intersection. Under Alternative
A, that intersection continues to fail. Thus, Pine Avenue's effectiveness as a stand-alone
improvement is fairly local in nature, although it serves a valuable purpose in helping to disperse
traffic by providing an alternative route.
Extending Pine Avenue attracts significantly more traffic volume in 2005 (double the
existing counts). Some of this additional traffic diverts to Artesia Avenue before heading south on
Lake Jessup Avenue and Central Avenue. The increased traffic volumes on Pine Avenue and the
western portion of Artesia Avenue indicate that the city should consider traffic calming strategies
to control speeds and minimize the impact of increased volume. 1bis will be addressed in Tier 2 of
this study.
Lake Jessup Avenue also performed favorably across most of the criteria. However, it is not
recommended for further study in Tier 2 because it did not reduce cut-through traffic as effectively
as Alternatives A and C, and because the land development characteristics of Lake Jessup Avenue
make it less suited to accommodate increases in traffic volume.' . Although it also parallels SR
434/Central A venue, the southern portion of Lake Jessup A venue is primarily residential in character
and does not directly serve commercial and employment centers, unlike the proposed southern
extension of Division Avenue.
It should be noted that most of the other alternatives considered are beneficial in various
ways. Some, such as the widening of SR 434/Central A venue, improve operating roadway
conditions but have obvious drawbacks. However, the analysis did not reveal any serious traffic
Oviedo North-South Corridor Study
Tier I Analysis
Executive Summary
9
impacts from extending only one of the four roads, rather than all four in the same fiscal year.
Alternative A - Pine Avenue, and Alternative C - Division Avenue, performed the best against the
stated evaluation criteria.
CONSISTENCY WITH PROPOSED POLICY AMENDMENT
The city's proposed policy amendment (CPA 97-1; Ordinance No. 1021) states that for any
paved extension involving one of the four north-south roads, certain conditions relating to traffic
volumes must be met: (1) the traffic service at the intersection of SR 434 and SR 426 is currently
operating at an unacceptable level of service, or is anticipated to operate at an unacceptable level of
service within five years; (2) the extension of one of the four roads will result in a majority of
average daily trips remaining local; and (3) daily traffic volumes will occur at an acceptable level
of service.
As the results indicate, ifno north-south extensions are completed by 2005 (the "E+C" or
"no-build" alternative), the LOS at the intersection of SR 434 and SR 426 will degrade below the
acceptable level of service standard (LOS "E"). Therefore, this criterion, with respect to the
proposed policy amendment, has been met. The analysis examined year 2005 conditions rather than
2002 (five years from now) due to the ability to more easily develop socioeconomic data and account
for build-out of several developments on the city's eastern side.
On Pine A venue, the analysis indicates that about 64 percent of the traffic will be local in
nature with the extension to Palm Drive and SR 434. There is projected to be an average of2,900
vehicle trips per day on Pine Avenue in 2005 without an extension. With the extension, the
projected 2005 volume rises to an average of 5,800. As stated in the previous section, with 64
percent of the traffic being local, this criteria, with respect to the proposed policy amendment, has
also been met for this alternative.
The same is true of Division Street, which would increase in volume from about 2,700 under
the 2005 no-build scenario to an average of about 6,700 with a northern and southern connection.
This reflects the four lane section to the south and its connection to Mitchell Hammock Road and
Executive Summary
Oviedo North-South Corridor Study
Tier I Analysis
10
Alexandria Boulevard. The Division Avenue alternative results in 61 percent local trips; lower than
the other alternatives, but still within the bounds of the proposed policy.
As the results in Table 4 indicate, no alternative will result in one of the four roads degrading
below an acceptable LOS. Therefore, this criterion has been met for both recommended alternatives.
SUMMARY
Based on an extensive analysis of more than a dozen different alternatives, the two that best
meet the objective criteria are Alternative A - extending Pine A venue as a two lane collector road
to Palm Drive and SR 434, and Alternative C - extending Division Avenue as a two lane road north
to Florida Avenue to provide access to SR 434 via DeLeon Street. Alternative C also assumes a four
lane southern connection between Broadway Street and Mitchell Hammock Road. It should be noted
that the city has not officially decided whether this section should be four lanes. These two
alternatives result in lower traffic volumes on SR 434/Central Avenue, reduce or eliminate cut-
through traffic in MacKinley's Mill and maintain the level of service standard on both Pine Avenue
and Division Avenue. Of the two, only the extension of Division Avenue results in an improved
level of service at the SR 434/SR 426 intersection; however, none of the alternatives considered
(except H, which includes Division Avenue) improves that intersection's operating condition.
This recommendation means that, if accepted, the extensions of Pine A venue and Division
Avenue will undergo a more detailed assessment of cost, land use and environmental impacts and
other factors.
One way to improve the ability of the Pine Avenue extension alternative on that intersection
may be to tie Pine A venue in with Clarke Street at Aulin A venue. This would allow motorists an
additional opportunity to bypass that intersection. While not specifically evaluated in the Tier I
analysis, if Alternative A is accepted, this evaluation is proposed to take place in the second phase
of the study.
In the long run, it is our assessment that the city should seek to make as many north-south
and east-west collector street connections in the study area as possible. By providing additional
Oviedo North-South Corridor Study
Tier I Analysis
Executive Summary
II
connections, traffic will disperse over the roadway network and will equalize impacts. For example,
the city has approved the installation of speed humps on Magnoiia Drive to mitigate traffic problems.
If additional connections were made to Franklin Street or Artesia A venue, then volumes on Magnolia
Drive would likely be somewhat reduced. Providing additional connections to create more of a grid
network would minimize impacts on anyone particular street. However, this analysis indicates that
either Division A venue or Pine A venue are corridors that would result in strong initial improvements
without unduly affecting adjacent land uses.
Oviedo North-South Corridor Study
Tier I Analysis
Executive Summary
12
Table 2
IMPACT ON SR 434 TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Greeneway to DeLeon Street to SR 426 to
Alternative/ DeLeon Street SR 426 Mitchell Hammock Road
Description Volume [1] % Change [2] Volume % Change Volume % Change
E+C 2005 "No Build" 16,400 N/A 16,300 N/A 13,300 N/A
A Pine A venue 14,500 -12% 13,300 -18% 13,400 1%
B Lake Jessup Avenue 14,100 -14% 12,600 -23% 13,100 -2%
C Division A venue 16,700 2% 13,200 -19% 11,400 -15%
D Lake Charm Drive 16,600 1% 13,500 -17% 13,300 0%
F Lake Jessup & Franklin 14,100 -14% 12,400 -24% 13,200 -1%
G Pine & Lake Jessup 15,000 -8% 13,300 -19% 13,400 0%
H Lake Jessup & Division 15,000 -8% 11,600 -29% 11 ,400 -14%
I SR 434 Four Lanes 21,400 30% 22,200 36% 20,800 56%
J Lake Jessup, AuIin, & Clark 14,100 -14% 12,400 -24% 12,800 -4%
K Pine & SR 426 (Four Lanes) 14,400 -12% 13,300 -I 80/0 12,000 -10%
L Pine & Mission 14,500 -12% 13,400 -18% 13,600 2%
M Lake Jessup & Magnolia 15,300 -7% 13,000 -20% 13,700 3%
Notes:
1. Volume expressed in average daily traffic (ADT) for 2005 rounded to the nearest hundred.
2. % Change reflects difference in daily volume from the E+C network for each corresponding segment.
TransCore E:\PROJECTS\ACTIYE\50092\50092PP\AL TEV AL. WB 1
Table 3
NORTH-SOUTH CORRIDOR LEVEL OF SERVICE
Alternatlve/ Pme Avenue Lake Jessup Avenue
Description Artesia A venue to SR 426 [4] Artesia Avenue to SR 426 [41 SR 426 to Mitchell Hammock
Volume [11 1% Change [2] LOS f3] Volume % Change LOS Volume % Change I LOS
E+C 2005 "No Build" 2,900 C 2,900 C 8,600 D
A Pine Avenue 5,800 103% D 6,000 104% D 8,700 2% D
B Lake Jessup Avenue 2,900 0% C 5,600 89% D 8,700 2% D
C Division Avenue 2,800 -1% C 2,100 -29% C 6,300 -27% D
D Lake Charm Drive 1,700 -39% C 2,600 -12% C 8,700 1% D
F Lake Jessup & Franklin 2,800 -1% C 6,300 113% D 8,600 1% D
G Pine & Lake Jessup 5,200 83% C 5,800 96% D 9,000 5% D
H Lake Jessup & Division 2,800 -1% C 3,300 12% C 6,800 -21% D
I SR 434 Four Lanes 2,600 -11% C 1,700 -43% C 3,000 -65% C
J Lake Jessup, Aulin, & Clark 2,800 -2% C 5,800 96% D 8,100 -5% D
K Pine & SR 426 (Four Lanes) 6,500 126% D 5,400 82% D 5,300 -39% D
L Pine & Mission 5,900 106% D 5,900 99% D 8,400 -3% D
M Lake Jessup & Magnolia 2,900 -0% C 7,300 146% D 9,700 13% D
AlternatIve! DIVISIOn Avenue Lake Charm Dnve
Description Existing terminus to SR 426 f41 SR 426 to Mitchell Hammock Artesia Avenue to CR 426 f41
Volume % Change I LOS Volume I % Change LOS Volume I % Change LOS
E+C 2005 "No Build" 2,200 C 700 C
A Pine Avenue 2,100 -9% C 700 -2% C
B Lake Jessup Avenue 2,200 -4% C 800 4% C
C Division Avenue 6,700 197% D 6,400 N/A D 700 -11% C
D Lake Charm Drive 1,000 -55% C 4,400 485% C
F Lake Jessup & Franklin 1,900 -14% C 700 -5% C
G Pine & Lake Jessup 2,100 -5% C 700 -1% C
H Lake Jessup & Division 5,800 158% D 5,600 N/A D 700 -13% C
I SR 434 Four Lanes 2,100 -8% C 700 -5% C
J Lake Jessup, Aulin, & Clark 2,200 -3% C 700 -1% C
K Pine & SR 426 (Four Lanes) 2,100 -8% C 700 -5% C
L Pine & Mission 2,000 -11% C 700 -2% C
M Lake Jessup & Magnolia 2,800 26% C 1,800 137% C
Notes:
I. Volume expressed in average daily traffic (ADT) for 2005 rounded to the nearest hundred.
2. % Change reflects difference in daily volume from the E+C network for each corresponding segment.
3. LOS determined using FDOT LOS Standards for urbanized areas, two lane non-state, non-major signalized roadways (1995).
4. Roadway termini change depending on the alternative.
TransCon: E:\PR01ECTS\ACT1VE\S0092\S0092ePlALTEV AL. WB 1
Table 4
NORTH-SOUTH CORRIDOR ENVIRONMENTAL LEVEL OF SERVICE [3]
Alternatlve/ Pme Avenue LaKe Jessup Avenue ELOS was determined on the following scale:
Description Artesia Avenue to SR 426 [4] Artesia Avenue to SR 426 [4] I SR 426 to Mitchell Hammock
Volume [1] I ELOS [21 Volume I ELOS I Volume I ELOS ELOS Volume
A < 2,000
E+C 2005 "No Build" 2,900 C 2,900 C 8,600 F B 2,001 - 2,800
A Pine A venue 5,800 F 6,000 F 8,700 F C 2,801 - 3,600
B Lake Jessup Avenue 2,900 C 5,600 F 8,700 F D 3,601 - 4,300
C Division Avenue 2,800 B 2,100 B 6,300 F E 4,301 - 5,000
D Lake Charm Drive 1,700 A 2,600 B 8,700 F F > 5,000
F Lake Jessup & Franklin 2,800 B 6,300 F 8,600 F
G Pine & Lake Jessup 5,200 F 5,800 F 9,000 F Source:
H Lake Jessup & Division 2,800 B 3,300 C 6,800 F Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1983,
I SR 434 Four Lanes 2,600 B 1,700 A 3,000 C and JHK & Associates, 1991.
J Lake Jessup, Aulin, & Clark 2,800 B 5,800 F 8,100 F
K Pine & SR 426 (Four Lanes) 6,500 F 5,400 F 5,300 F
L Pine & Mission 5,900 F 5,900 F 8,400 F
M Lake Jessup & Magnolia 2,900 C 7,300 F 9,700 F
Alternative! U1V1Slon Avenue La.Ke Charm Dnve
Description Existing terminus to SR 426 [411 SR 426 to Mitchell Hammock Artesia A venue to CR 426 [4]
Volume ELOS Volume ELOS Volume ELOS
E+C 2005 "No Build" 2,200 B 700 A
A Pine A venue 2,100 B 700 A
B Lake Jessup Avenue 2,200 B 800 A
C Division Avenue 6,700 F 6,400 F 700 A
D Lake Charm Drive 1,000 A 4,400 E
F Lake Jessup & Franklin 1,900 A 700 A
G Pine & Lake Jessup 2,100 B 700 A
H Lake Jessup & Division 5,800 F 5,600 F 700 A
I SR 434 Four Lanes 2,100 B 700 A
J Lake Jessup, Aulin, & Clark 2,200 B 700 A
K Pine & SR 426 (Four Lanes) 2,100 B 700 A
L Pine & Mission 2,000 A 700 A
M Lake Jessup & Magnolia 2,800 B 1,800 A
Notes:
1. Volume expressed in average daily traffic (ADT) for 2005 rounded to the nearest hundred.
2. LOS determined using ELOS volume thresholds for collectors; figures in bold represent segments which are projected to be ELOS
deficient (<D) in 2005.
3. Environmental level of service measures the impact of traffic jvolume on adjacent property owners.
4. Roadway termini change depending on the alternative.
TransCore E:IPROJECTS\ACTIVE\50092\50092PPIAL TEV AL. WB I
Table 5
CUT-THROUGH TRAFFIC
Alternative! McTavandash Drive Bentley Street
Description Total Cut-through % % Change Total Cut-through % % Change
Traffic Traffic Cut-through ELOS [3] from E +C Traffic Traffic Cut-through ELOS from E+C
E+C 2005 "No Build" 2,957 1,632 55% F 240 0 0% A
A Pine A venue 1,328 3 0% A -100% 330 0 0% A 0%
B Lake Jessup Avenue 2,136 811 38% F -50% 219 0 0% A 0%
C Division Avenue 1,801 476 26% F -71% 226 0 0% A 0%
D Lake Charm Drive 2,201 876 40% F -46% 216 0 0% A 0%
F Lake Jessup & Franklin 2,166 841 39% F -48% 230 0 0% A 0%
G Pine & Lake Jessup 1,325 0 0% A -100% 329 0 0% A 0%
H Lake Jessup & Division 1,903 578 30% F -65% 212 0 0% A 0%
I SR 434 Four Lanes 2,150 825 38% F -49% 210 0 0% A 0%
J Lake Jessup, Aulin, & Clark 2,224 899 40% F -45% 198 0 0% A 0%
K Pine & SR 426 (Four Lanes) 1,325 0 0% A -100% 293 0 0% A 0%
L Pine & Mission 1,325 0 0% A -100% 312 0 0% A 0%
M Lake Jessup & Magnolia 2,227 902 41% F -45% 234 0 0% A 0%
Notes:
1. Volume expressed in average daily traffic (ADT) for 2005 rounded to the nearest hundredth.
2. LOS determined using ELOS volume thresholds for collectors; figures in bold represent segments which are projected to be ELOS
deficient (<D) in 2005.
3. Environmental level of service measures the impact of traffic volume on adjacent property owners.
Cut-through ELOS was determined on the following scale:
ELOS
A
B
C
D
E
F
% Cut-through
<2.0
2.0-3.9
4.0 - 5.9
6.0 - 7.9
8.0 to 9.9
10.0 or more
Source: Cut through thresholds from TransCore!ffiK, 1991.
TransCore E:\PROJECTS\ACTIVE\50092\5.0092PP\AL TEV AL. WB 1
Table 6
EAST-WEST TRAFFIC VOLUMES FOR SELECTED ROADS
Alternative! SR 426 Artesia Street
Description Pine Avenue to Lake Jessup Avenue to Pine A venue to Lake Jessup A venue to
Lake Jessup Avenue SR 434 Lake Jessup Avenue SR 434
Volume [1] 1% Change [2] Volume % Change Volume % Change Volume % Change
E+C 2005 "No Build" 15,200 15,400 2,000 1,600
A Pine Avenue 14,900 -2% 15,700 2% 5,400 169% 1,500 -6%
B Lake Jessup A venue 15,200 0% 16,700 9% 1,900 -4% 8,600 424%
C Division Avenue 15,200 0% 15,600 1% 1,900 -5% 1,200 -26%
D Lake Chann Drive 15,400 1% 15,900 3% 1,900 -5% 1,600 -3%
F Lake Jessup & Franklin 15,200 -0% 16,600 8% 1,900 -6% 8,400 411%
G Pine & Lake Jessup 14,600 -4% 15,600 1% 3,500 74% 7,400 352%
H Lake Jessup & Division 14,900 -2% 15,800 3% 1,800 -8% 8,000 384%
I SR 434 Four Lanes 13,700 -10% 13,400 -13% 1,500 -24% 1,400 -14%
J Lake Jessup, Aulin, & Clark 15,800 4% 16,500 7% 1,900 -5% 8,600 423%
K Pine & SR 426 (Four Lanes) 16,400 8% 16,500 7% 5,400 173% 1,600 -2%
L Pine & Mission 14,800 -3% 16,200 5% 5,500 177% 1,800 8%
M Lake Jessup & Magnolia 14,900 -2% 18,000 17% 1,900 -4% 8,200 402%
Alternative! Magnolia Street
Description Lake Jessup A venue to SR 434 to Division Street to
SR 434 Division Street CR 426
Volume % Change Volume % Change Volume I % Change
E+C 2005 "No Build" 700 3,400
A Pine Avenue 700 4% 2,800 -19%
B Lake Jessup Avenue 300 -55% 3,000 -11%
C Division Avenue 100 -90% 500 -86%
D Lake Chann Drive 100 -80% 300 -92%
F Lake Jessup & Franklin 300 -64% 2,200 -34%
G Pine & Lake Jessup 700 4% 3,000 -12%
H Lake Jessup & Division 100 -90% 600 -82%
I SR 434 Four Lanes 100 -92% 3,700 9%
J Lake Jessup, Aulin, & Clark 300 -52% 3,000 -11%
K Pine & SR 426 (Four Lanes) 700 1% 2,800 -18%
L Pine & Mission 700 2% 2,600 -24%
M Lake Jessup & Magnolia 1,000 41% 3,300 -2% 12,200 N!A
Notes:
I. Volume expressed in average daily traffic (ADT) for 2005 rounded to the nearest hundred.
2. % Change reflects difference in daily volume from the E+C network for each corresponding segment.
T"",c.m, E:\PROIECTSlACTIVE\50092\l0092PI'IAL TF.V AL.wBI
Table 7
TRAFFIC VOLUMES FOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS BY ALTERNATIVE
Volume LI J
Alternative Road (Improvement) E+C Alternative [2] I % Change [3]
F Franklin Street (West to Lake Jessup Avenue; east to Lockwood Boulevard). 200 400 100%
J Aulin Avenue (Realigned with Oviedo Crossing Terrace). 300 2,200 633%
Clark Street (Connected to SR 426). 200 800 300%
L Mission Road (Paved and extended north to Field Street). N/A 100 N/A
M Magnolia Street (Extended east to CR 426). 1,900 3,200 68%
Notes:
I. Volume expressed in average daily traffic (ADT) for 2005 rounded to the nearest hundred.
2. Volume reflects weighted average between the volumes on the existing segment plus the improved segment.
3. % Change reflects difference in daily volume from the E+C network for each corresponding segment.
TransCore E:\PROJECTS\ACTIVE\50092\50092PP\AL TEV AL. WB 1
t'lh,' b,t 3
TABLE 4
Texaco Star l\1art @ SR 434 & Palm Drive
STUDY ROAD\VA Y PARA1\lETERS
.. .' ...., ," '. '.
.. , ...
.'
.u Of. R~I~~}i. " Art&~";~iN;:;:';'.\) .' Generalized Peak Hour
rr ..
Segment' .. .. '" Lanes .' Direction Volumes
Roadway ." .' ... . Peak (2)
5R .H.t 6 !2 ~ 12 I;
Eastern Beltway to Deleon St 2L Arterial E - 660 SIO ~80 '-)()O
Deleon St to CR 419 2L Arterial E - 660 810 880 900
PROJECTED P.1\1. PEAK HOUR ROAD'V A Y LEVEL OF SERVICE
'\',';::/c:";'::'..;: "'.:. ....::>':...P~M: Jl6lkH6ur:.:tiafij'~&oi.unl'es'7> . . Ex ce"...ds
'. ..' .....". .
- .. ;' EXisting &.;.:. ;Proj~.Trip :~~t~rl~. '!:~\};:;'To~l':' ..... ..
..,..... \.,.... ..: . Adopted
. ..
.. - .. .. c~~hed (3"); :Biiliibtiti ci:ri
. Roadway. ':.Segrrient'.:",:.:.. ',",' Tra1fic Volumes :'LOS .. .' LOS
..
SR -B..t EB \VB EB \VB EB WB
8lstcm Beltw3)' Lo Dekon SL 731 556 59.0% 26 26 757 582 C No
5R 43..t SB NB SB NB SB l'.TB
Deleon 5t to CR 419 753 573 36.0% 16 16 769 589 C No
I. Adopted Level of Service. City of Oviedo Comprehensive Plan Traffic Circulation Element Policy 1.3 and 1.4.
2. 1995 FOOT Level of Service Standards and Guidelines Manual Urbanized Areas Group I a.
3. Includes existing traffic, vested and encumbered trips plus 3% background growth.
Traffic Planning and Design, Inc. ,1996
08:4) AM 01/15/97
72
01/09/98 18:20 ~407 422 3928
,
JHK & ASSOCIATES ~~~ OVIEDO
@002
Spq'l- KIL'
~....'
....
( ." ,.....~"" c orl")
Traffic Planning and Design, Inc.
535 Versailles Drive, Suite 200, Maitland, FL 32751.7305. {407) 628-9955. FAX (407) 628-8850
MEMORANDUM
To: David Moon, AICp.
From:
Joseph Roviaro, AICP ~
Pages:
1
Date:
F ebruazy 3, 1997
Job#:
1172
Subject: Traffic Counts - MacKinley's Mill Subdivision Existing Cut-Through
Estimation
The purpose of this memorandum is to estimate the number of non MacKinley's
Mill traffic utilizing MacTavandash Drive and New Castle Lane. Traffic Counts
were conducted January 27 through January 31, 1997. Table 1 and Table 2
summarize the traffic counts hourly by direction and day. A three day average
is also provided. Total daily trips entering and exiting Mackinley's Mill is 2,186.
The MacKinley's Mill subdivision is and upscale subdivision with 106 dwelling
units. Utilizing the 5th Edition ITE Trip Generation Report with February 1995
Update Land Use Code 210 Single Family trip generation rate and adjustment
factor for "vehicles owned", results in a daily trip rate of 12.5 trips per
dwelling unit. Applying this trip generation rate results in an estimated daily
trip volume of 1,325 trips for the MacKenley's Mill subdivision.
Subtracting the estimated MacKinley's Mill trips from the average daily total
volume results in 861 daily trips. This number is divided by 2 to calculate the
number of cut-through vehicles ( 861 /2 = 430.5).
Typically, P.M. peak hour traffic is 10% of the daily traffic. Based upon the
above, approximately 43 vehicles are cWTently estimated to be cutting through
MacKinley's Mill during the P.M. peak hour time period.
Time
AM 12 - 1
I . 2
2 - 3
) . 4
" - 5
5 - 6
6. 7
7. 8
8. 9
9 - 10
10.11
II . 12
PM 12. I
I. 2
2. 3
) - 4
4. 5
5. 6
6 - 7
7. 8
8.9
9. 10
10. II
II . 12
Total Trip.
Tuesday 1/28/97
South North Two-Way.
Bound Bound TOIa\
o 0 0
o 0 '0
o 0 0
o 0 0
o 0 0
o 0 0
000
o () 0
o 0 0
o 0 0
9 5 14
21 10 31
)) 16 49
20 III 38
40 ]I 7 J
26 21 47
5Q 21 71
5) 22 75
52 27 79
32 16 48
36 11 48
17 ) 20
24 9 33
~ 2 !:!
H2
216
638
r,off~ l'fanuu.. .Nl Dat,II. 1M... 1991
TABLE 1
Driveway Count Summary
~4qnley" Mill Subdivision,. Mac:Tava.nduh Drive South or SR 434
.: "<Wednesday 1I29197 Thursday 1130/97 Friday 1I3l197
'sOUtIi Nonh ~WaySouih . North ~Way SOuth . North Two-Way
.BoliM.' Bound Tol2l . Bound Bound Total Bound' Bound '. TOtal
3 2 5 9 I 10 I 2 3
2 2 4 0 0 0 4 2 6
3 2 5 4 0 4 4 I 5
I 0 I 2 0 2 I 0 1
2 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 2
I 8 9 0 8 8 1 7 8
14 37 51 15 29 ~ 19 32 51
41 70 III 41 70 117 42 68 110
25 46 71 19 30 4? 22 48 70
19 2J 42 16 28 44 30 22 52
t3 13 26 14 15 29 15 17 )2
20 17 37 20 14 )4 14 17 31
21 9 30 2J 18 4' 24 20 44
31 34 65 19 20 39 28 27 55
44 26 70 30 45 75 45 )) 78
31 25 62 3 I 21 52 25 2J 48
54 15 69 51 ) I 112 55 24 79
43 J 9 62 68 2) 91 7J 26 99
52 19 71 -<<i 20 66 51 )5 86
45 12 57 41 lJ 5Q 46 22 68
21 9 )0 37 7 44 )6 14 50
28 I) 41 26 10 36 45 10 55
17 5 22 9 2 11 26 8 34
II ! U H J D !:! J D
549
407
956
~I
404
945
623
461
I,01U
,'{
H)ay Average (Wed. Thllf, Fri)
South North TWO-Way
Bound . Bouncl TolaI
4) 1.7 6.0
2.0 I ) 3.)
3.7 1.0 4.7
IJ 0.0 U
1.3 0.0 1.3
0.7 7.7 8.3
16.0 )2.7 48.7
4)) 69.3 112.7
22.0 41.3 63,)
21.7 24.3 46.0
14.0 15.0 29.0
18.0 16.0 )4.0
22.7 15.7 38.)
26.0 27.0 53.0
39.7 )4.7 74)
) 1.0 23.0 54.0
53.3 233 76.7
61.J 22.7 84.0
49.7 24.7 74.3
44.0 14.3 58.3
)1) 10.0 oil.)
no 11.0 44.0
17.3 5.0 22.)
1lJ. 2.3 ill
o
r-
"-
o
(Q
"-
(Q
00
r-
oo
N
o
~
....
o
"
....
N
N
W
(Q
N
ce
;>:
l1<>
;:.
571.0
995.0
Vl
Vl
o
()
H4.a
;:.
-;
:r,
Vl
o
".
tr1
g
IE!;l
o
o
w
Time
AM 12. I
1. 2
2. 3
3 - 4
4. 5
5. 6
6. 7
7. 8
8. 9
9.10
/0.11
J I - 12
PM 12. 1
I . 2
2. 3
3. -l
4. 5
5 - 6
6 - 7
7 - 8
8. 9
9.10
10.11
11. 12
Tot.1 Triil'
~ lJ28197
South Nonh Two-Way
Bound Bound ToIlII
o 0 0
o 0 0
o 0 0
o 0 0
o 0 0
o 0 0
o 0 0
o 0 0
000
o 0 0
3 ~ 7
15 18 33
18 26 44
19 U 5-4
37 -l3 80
40 43 83
33 36 69
49 ~5 94
42 S8 100
25 41 ~
26 25 51
9 17 26
9 31 .w
!! !! 12
jjj
4jj
766
Traffic 11~ oIUJ~, Iftc., 1P97
TABLE 2
Driveway Count Summary
J\1jiC,Kjj!J9" Mill Subdivision - New G~tle Lane Nortb orArte.sia AVenue
,', . wednesdaY 1129197 Thursday 1130/'97 Frldlry 1i31197
~(1(' Nonh Two-Way" SoUth North Two-Way Sault! . . Nell'll! Two,Way.
. ,BOand: " 'Botind TOla1 : BOund Bound Total BoUnd" 80aDd Total. .
I 3 " 2 3 5 1 2 3
3 4 7 2 2 4 2 5 7
3 2 5 2 0 2 4 I 5
o 0 0 I 0 1 0 I I
/ 0 / 0 0 0 2 0 2
6 .5 .1/ I .5 6 4 5 9
/4 2741 18 30 48 17 28 45
70 47 117 78 58 136 74 S6 130
51 48 99 SO ~I 91 47 51 98
24 27 S I 2U 3 I 51 30 28 58
16 22 38 21 25 ~6 18 28 46
26 22 48 /7 2J ~o 2S 23 48
27 29 56 33 32 65 19 40 59
28 53 81 20 37 57 19 4/ 60
.s I 42 93 32 53 85 40 49 89
28 48 76 27 "7 74 32 46 78
29 43 72 35 H 78 51 45 %
44 49 93 43 64 107 53 64 117
47 4S 92 40 46 86 J7 63 100
24 22 46 36 ~o 76 33 46 79
20 23 43 21 N 4S 17 3J SO
17 23 40 I~ 14 28 23 24 47
10 1/ 21 .5 IU 15 17 12 29
1 1 !i :! ~ 2 2 11 II
SoU
598
1,141
521
6Jj
1,155
1.278
!l7~
70-4
3,Day A\omige.(Wcd, Thur. Fri)
. South. 'N.~ Two-Way
'. BOund' . BOuDcI Total
IJ 2.7 4.0
2,3 3.7 6.0
3.0 1.0 4.0
0.3 03 0.7
1.0 0,0 1.0
3.7 5.0 8.7
16.3 21U H 7
701.0 53.7 127.7
49.3 46.7 '/6.0
24.7 28.7 5J.3
18.3 25,0 43.3
22.7 22.7 ~.s.3
26.3 JJ. 7 60.0
22.3 4J. 7 66,0
41.0 48.0 89.0
29.0 47,0 76.0
38.3 43 7 82.0
46.7 59.0 10.s.7
41.3 51.3 92.7
31.0 36.0 67.0
19.3 26.7 ~6.0
18.0 20.3 38.3
10.7 11.0 21.7
.5.3 L.Q ill
t,l I
J .
0
....
"-
0
to
"-
(0
co
....
co
t>.>
....
~
....
0
-.)
....
N
N
W
to
N
co
c...
;;;:
~
546.3
1.19J.J
;,-
Vl
Vl
o
("l
....
;,-
-3
t:1
Vl
J.
J.
J.
o
-0::
....
t:1
o
o
645.0
~
o
o
....
r -- ~-----~ ,---- - - --11--- -- " ---~ --------- r-- - "--, c;--- --- "-1
: !I II i
I :i I: 'I
I ,!I I I, :1
! I ii I:' '.
,-LDR , ' ,Ii .1
I i J II I, ! ~,II
rCM ~i I' 3 i j,,' !I
~ ' I !, !:
~ i I 11:1 I!
"~~~~-.t1.-L---'-~--- _ "'., ".' _'_~_ __ L D ~ ;,.. "i' __Jl, c" ,,"_c-- -='=-~=l r='- -- ,-- - --"1 [==""1
I, L.1[T I I ,T 1:- --------.-. , II II' ~
.. - < AJ<~J I ! ; ! i I
Ii I I I
!i I 'I i
, I ,. I
. ',I I 1 I
~ I,! I
4';:'" I! I I I I
,i .\ ( 1\."";;' ~I!! 1 '_ - .\..- ; rn- I . I l:=_-,,=,.;-c-::=-~,_Jl_--u-_L----- _____L_ __ _J__J '__ _=_____..
~ 1" ~ ~ ~[ '......:u ,.....' -"','_ /. I' ---'--' =-, .. --. "'If..- ... 1__, "." -.......,.. i I ~ I (il ,..0 i'l ,-------------.- -- --- --- ---- \, II --- --- - -- J [:'.-:::,= --.'- 1-_________.,
\ #, '-'" , · ~ ..' ----...:=./ )\ ~ I J~' ::=:::'-'~ -::) I I I t ~~ , I _
"1/4 ;~::.::~._-III . eM "Ii \L '~, .~,~; ~=- - ;vr-i\~>/~ I,! 'I a.. ii ,,//---
\)1 , j,\\----.. '_-:--"~='Y L___ l.~1/1/-, \>_.1 J i I l.~l~~~~1 ~'U ,j L/
~!\- '~(~~-'~~-~~>~':.:~~~:=.-~]~ 1 a 1\(\;;,,1 lb' I/~illl~t Iho E~_:L- \~>, ~ ~!'! RL i ~~ ~
'\~./'el', ;1)\.. "'- 1DIT>..l'."1lll'~. 'i ~--:-JI i\P~ I III~.. Ciiaj< ~ I, -:! I r.~~
' ~ - f," ~- --~--.--:::----. C ~ I r- ! - \I~ ~~ I ('\..- / 'l'u,1 V J'. i
--'---. u--~ri!--a.-----r-'-- --------- ~ P .\1 / ~= - ~/~" L~ I ~/ ;
<!,~Tr-'\~I I'r-.---"J .~ DR l iju:---:--~~,:--j \=-:';M~~. 1 I /::? I
i?,....:::.~JJ:~~R. . 'If~.~-:::.I!ll II I(J~\ 111!- c~:)) ,~[p LA::APM'~~; 'I 0 ~C ~ // /
'.u.'MJ ~-:<'o~~ '-'ltv~<~ "~~:~.~J _!! ) .--:l' --\ II ',-, (:)13 ~L'Jl[-----';;:' c;~ ,=,' ~ :JI~.~ ilL=i'~, -Y'
~--__----->W__ -- '-. b i J I __ n
~.c-~j.-..-l.r..-_:=. '=-- .:.;;;;.==c. l.~~"1i. r"~~'= :~.. F-~~ 1~_1 J~~ v.. Ij !~- ~~~:/;;; -':~QJOfl~
i 1-::Lr~.-'~~.... '--. ll~.=-,.J: ~_._, c=-~~~! (<? ~ t:> J~;I'~- CM i i t~r; ~_t1 J J:Cl~I~'hDi~
I r <:::_:-..f.&Ol...iL l---iJI 1l..IDR' .~ _ ~fty II' A I I I~ II I~
I , -----,'-::...---= :h__~=.- MI 1[,,, L/ ~.... (-a-ui;;,i*{r. l2) ___ ~ J[J JLJ '
7 i ,11~J}H e ..-., Ii /;l[t / ~kJ [Q] ",LLJ~1 In
i ! IIII;~ r= '~", 'i // i~ ..41 ,;J;;~l' ,/~ou,\ ~ 1.' ,/.
I t ~- ;II~ OFFfm-. .'",,-r IT l! Jdl ,.~~;/ Ii -;] t LJ LIJIIV ~ I,~i ~ (LAfT) i Pill ill C /e',....
DR / 1.-- 111- ........' 1'1!' JL_ _1_ _._._____JL-.~ L-J D[:::::::;,:::::;~'.,lI~ -, ~r / ~/
L ~!E:'r-::..::::'l "f.-~",\[ t~-1..i M 'Vl[ r--~ iJr-Jnr--.----- '11--' .,-~ 11[-~1<"~ JM RL
.' q1 , :r(~ I p ~ L_ L._ LJI~ \ \ CM ::~.~:"'"'' } __ _
I'i, M.' ~J ~L I I 111ClF" , , i .-" ( '..' - .;- "
I~~t- '-!~'''l/ MD~ p i ~"I~r l1il: :, P ,/ '" I, ~'l-rlOR ..'~
I / II '~} l_" - FfUlmI=!! ._ "JLJII i'l ii ..l. i "" nr;n IN i I, ,lOR / .
; tr-;<Fiffi ;J,t:- - r 11-111 II i'C~l! LO.tt,. /,~_'n_, ,\~_n LOR 1\ L .q I..,?
j ~ \ \i~
Ii ~ \ C RL //,___n___H C
. INn .!~. C~::) " rl, ~rl_'_-11 ~';:Jllt_l.c~UJ4/~C~~'-~~---~~..:----~..'", I - !<c"--iJ: ~/lOR ..\ ~w , . ) LOR) C
1pl ~.......... ./ IJIU'..Ill........... L___ --. 'f) ~ f."~/. 1 Q.I''<<O. /J, ,\ / /f""T,.,, ',-:.:.\ ..;/ /
ULI I I /. Y ""0' <, . '\'\ \ \ ," C ri
-".-- I j-;::;==' \ Lr'\O I I <~ 1Im\ ~/, \~ \ \ ,., ,/i i II C
l,~:-.,-,._,..____~ f/_' ~ Il RL ~,-:tr.~.~ I~, "V:t!f'7 ~'-Ir-- .. _~~~:/\ \~. '/,\f ji,/: CM " j ./) I; oJ _ _ SEE INSET -e. I
...~-_. ORD. 1042
-... IA . W i' ) I ; ; ,A:' .m~c - ." )' IIlJ~__UL -~ /A~~ . i I ,~" - ~ - I ~/:J lJc:'-' 11-17-87
..'nlIC"ll'l:l..~fIDtI' I
...~; ,;:-_u_ ...uc-C-M----r--~.MI~. . (i1!f1'_ p ';:}'\~:~Jkc\~ ~~_~~ l,j DR. a:-"i:;.;--- ~\ .1_ RL p;y ~
V- .- ,__m" '////////,;i ... RL'~1lli ,.'ft.-./ ~~ '\.\~\ \\""\ W". lWIV '"lJJ. ~.-........ 7 IVer. . _.... :/-./'~ . - . J . LOR
~ RL L;;{~ =>c_:L~'" ___,__ l\__,..:...II'--~~\~ C 11'iI Ic\:: Irllrmllif- tfl~1 \F"I'J ~I ~ ~&~ ". .'
CM ! ."'.....'..b. \, .,' .... ~/;0 'n1 lr--m--''-' l~~\~~ p. lll(r:~~ ijll c- r# /1// ",-;r'..~LJ l~f)IW~'J'~ :ll~.'III! ~ '
I ~ij; i ' 1 I rf. ,--', ))~. \!l " )\ I _1 ""U\ ) JtJ Ivr \~U!J&JL / !l ~-> H </ .......................
I ,"/./;, I, 3,. \ ~~ '\' -,..... ~,>_I\ \ r I~ 'll r',. (?~. \ (.---~.-_. -"'.' './/( # ~
, __-.. '; ~.JJI 1'1 br (( /' i) ~4~ .., ~ ~ -,.\~, \~)/~, ~:r \1.... ~~~_:==-~~,,~::-,.,::::-~_:~(!~.; P
--..-..", -'- / '10- --- L ,t,e \';:/ / .....\/dr'.....-/ L I ~'( \~ ' I,' V('.....-, - \ ~ ':. C \' \\ I \ \1 J~)..
, .... ", i _". 'C' r' ___/' .', -<.1\;i\ ~::::c...~/~ ,.\/~;I ,,~:;,,~!, ~ "d;<; \ _ \, \ .')" m I! ill 11'1. 4
;'__c'C,_"'. _CC==..c"'_ "",,,w,"- . .. . -.. '''''eM'' PUD ~7J~r\!~1r:;~~~~;\v\15t)))I~(f!{ ~~ P \'~"-"":>1 :\~.\-' _ {r.!~/? ........'=:~);' ~~~.:j
JI ~ l~__;> I) (;.....--::....~ I\~~\././;I \.---- \ \~\x/ .,', '-, -" P \ '~\ '3~..;:;'L} .J._:;~~"
_ ......-- ,'/ ~ .' \\ ".4~":::\ \ \\./'/ ~ \ .---_--"'\\ \\ '.' ~ . '& i.. ~/ \ il ,,-. ~.-ar.
---L
- I,' --' '--- (- --- ,~'/' ~? ~t ~-: /~l..J 1~1-----~ /' \ ,.{,\~,~ ~ ~ --... 8
\ I \ c~ATH ') ,___,~ ~~)Jt~~~Jl II ,,\, _ i" It '\T~~~}" ~~J~
CM _ \.~AV:_ [~l-'7 '<~.::; '~~~tl ~ d "\;\~~~~~~r.~l"/I~.~ ~~'s:. ,!\\~~\i\)~~,_--
,. .-- LOR '~.?-~- ~ (::.'--_'" ~i/ /. .~' ..rr{r ~\ \ \ / ,&t:~ \ ~ l-;-.,;-;.:I \1\ .~\ (l) '~..
.=-:.:-C-::::="=,:~:.:::.:::,=:.:. . i . ~ .===_=-_-=--=--=-= ~~-;;!~~\ (I~- " D I ~;/1) ,~, ,:~ f \/~W~;j ')\ \~~~ ,:rWi~. . ~I ,,\,\~,,~:,;\~~'l - -.--) ~ <'>\,~.:.-.r'.'...J'~ ~,
- T ~ ---l r-- g'~.' _'" \ \\---- ~----.~I II \. <' '.;. ) \~ <.: ~ )r... \~"~ ~r If ,,.-pr /,
CM -r l%I - - ~"-; ~ .,~\ ! A:I 1Ir~a;; )i W ~'~~~l~':~~> \'\~--' (? ~"'~>-'.'j?;""f<<" C [1( \,<.:';:>'--"
I ,=- ..~ 1YNr'J-, J[t2' -..-.,u ? / Q. . . '![Jl /, 'i c~~ -=:J r- ---$., \ ',---.J0 /~ '\! '.-' 1 ) (r - ---
l'J.1N;bi! , ;;,-,::3\ \r-i7;j(~~I!(I~f{f~/>/~.~ .r! '1~(*I~'~f1'r:~"![\\~\Wlil ..1 \\.~:)/I)"
i ,v '(/1 ,WJ ~...._./,' I // U ../-~ i I A ~I"/ \ '.~ ~'I \
, ~;) 'j 1- ---- '-::-==; r/ /. /l~ I i ~ /,_____~ ....' \\) : -,- "'-b -) . CD-' t'~~
";';'~n r~-~-H-r' I ' ~nr ~~~ 1 '~~:I~~ r i. ~ .~\~ \ ',_ }
I\.,..! I ~ ili ;11 :.,1. ~llIlli' Lr3lrl-~ nT~~~f;;~,,,c i";~! (~)YT~/~IG-"\\~~'T' LDI ! ~~\ i\
, i ;II I. - I ~ I ,.11-- J1 '-::'::) ',I (;; ',...._ [:.; I U ?~;,-{ \\ C::" S.I \ \ \ '! / !r:>.~.::-~__..I, ) /
'~:~.:::-~: \r I! :! II i i LJI - " " . 1\ . -.-J1.r6'!1 tL jJ / / ~_. /1-
", l.J l._J L_._._n _.____JL._J .__J L.. .__ . '_n_ Krn_.. ' \ . \\ c=,. \ / ~...~ ..'" L_n..i.__._____,
i i r-----.---c-...--...;u...------.----;o;;.;, ;,"L--- J) I
"At,~f[, ! 7!/~(\'~::J IJ . , "~ ~
. I C ~~, ")\_;:.~ /!:7/" (\
.' ,~~ ~_ I
/' c../" .>"\..:c;'~-
/ ,/,;/'" /.....'
c~r_~r T,~~_" rf~~~/
\:< -I~~~ [/t~=--11
c=:;:..--- -r
~ I
-
ORD. 1031
INSET "A"
- ADOPTED AUG. 4, 1997
C Irl"
'ilA
, ./
/'
! / \
/;/
,/.- J ]
1\ c:-
/ .
) I mill"
t
-
__" _._ __ ..,.____"_______ ______________ ~_u.__u..____._.._.~______...____ __._. _ ._.....___..__.__..._______.__~...___ ._.___~_.__.__.__ _ ..__
....--.. ,,---- : -,,,... "" r- . - -. - -. ------1 ,.--'..-.---1 r--.----.---.--.
Iii : ' ; i. ii'
I~ : I ! I ~
I" , i. I
!~ ~
J 'i~ : I~
i: i
CITY OF OVIEDO
2010 FUTURE LAND USE
ADOPTED DECEMBER 15, 1997
MAP 1-2
PU,D
\ "
Equi\l1Ys Greens
Equinus Greens
'Live Oak Plantation)
~
{
Q::
~
>
~
~
~
=
U
f0-
r ~
U
9
:z
o
u
~
i
IMl
WlU)m
y/ )
/~~t,
N ~
~ ~,
20 FEET ROW
TO SEMINOLE
COUNTY
d
~
!
I
.
,
I
:i
, ,
, ,
(
)
I
i
!
~
(
C
CM
DMU
HDR
IN
LOR
LDR- T
MDR
OFF
P
PUD
RL
~
RL
r---' rrrrIl D LOW DENSITY
L___J RURAL LllllJ CONSERVATION RESIDENTIAL
,....
~
C
(' 00(
',J',
0Jm9 J
~'7...'"
,\'
..
,'"
\ ,
-
t1dUrl ~I~"""', 'PT
I
I
PUD
f ~-~..
\ --- -------
\
,
~
'; \
I
/
It1.l'I.....,.....l ~1I
~,
,-
I Ii
I
s...._."." It,
_..c T ..~ ....i.._ ___._....__..___ ~~ - - -.-
__ ___._ _' ....---i. ---r----- __f-
INSET "B"
ORD, 1042 - ADOPTED NOV. 17, 1997
~
HOR
\
---I
i
\
N.T.S.
\~ } \. . .
. . "'" J~\
') . \d ~
q ~~I:::: S:
f'~~
t- > :. ~<
1 1- l' /~. . .
" . ..1 .....J--lr~ \ 1/ ~-
, .. .J . J' I(~/..l ~
/ l:-;'. . . \'.., ~ .. ~.. ()
A~j.. . . .. I.., f'\ ~~'.. ""
/ '" .. . . "'~ - ,,~ -.. . . --- .... }. + + ~ n
,t + . . . . . . . . . .. . + . . . . . . ,;.;N +.-J ). . . r-".l
+ . . . . . . . . . 't ).. ./ '\ ..0
,...i 1"-.... . . . . . . . . . { \) {' . . ''-/ . ~fY /
~/ '\, . . . . l'~--,,~. > .-.J . . . . . . . . . '" J
(. . / ~----.. ",--'J + o. . ',/'./
~;---~l. . ~ D [)l::J (0: ~ :;~~r~~
. . . ./f ~
ji" ----~~ . . ...J \j
~ ------- . =--. - f.> .---------
~ -- ~, I
~ ~-,~..,'-~,{5!
'-..J
............
- "
)
t'---___.___~-
"--
D CONSERVATION
r
LDR-T
~ !.DR
C
ECON RIVER
PR0TEC'l10N ZONE
\
\~';-7"
-- ,
t,
~!
'. "-,,~::::,, '\
.-=>, \ \
\
RURAL
~..,.
CONSERV A TION
COMMERCIAL
DOWNTOWN MIXED-USE
HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
INDUSTRIAL
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL-TRANSITIONAL
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
OFFICE
PUBLIC
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
RURAL
N
c
'-"'- I
, ,
, ,
( ,
I
,
I
i
,
./.f E
i\.I >- ']N (
i
Ii
. II
;' I
--- II
~Q. .r-CM Ii
/~-, '\ II
............................ -, ('j ( , 1 .J I
~~~~ l
... - -.-..- - - -. ----,---- ------.-
........-........ ~ ~ .."-- -'-.--- --- -----...---.----.--
-----, .--.-- . '" :"1'-........
.....-.....,.-.
LME __
r'" .....~_
,,/ "1
I
LOR
-
t~~~L;:t~~~
(~
.....-
-~:---.
'~;::--...,
----'----..,
----:::~, (-")
l ~ -...,~. "- ..J
/ /- /,,~\ C / G-=--. ~.~\\\ CJ
---:.JI~:'- ~ \\
/ "
/ -- ~/
~' / HOP'SI ~HOE (
, -----~--- )
.~- 1.,---'
{I '~"'-""
\'
. ',,----
'-", '~
'\ "\
\ LAf[
----------,
[VA!
-- \
"
I
I
(
-', - .J
PUO
~
\
\
'~ '1
'- )
, /
',-,/
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:. Ci of Oviedo, tlorida
I
I
I
I
I
.
omre enslve
an
Adopted
. May 15, 1995
-4,
CITY OF OVIEDO FLORIDA
400 ALEXANDRIA BOULEVARD. OVIEDO, FLORIDA 32765. (407) 977-6000
v. EUGENE WILLIFORD, III
CITY MANAGER
November 21, 1997
Mr. Ray Eubanks
Florida Department of Community Affairs
Bureau of Local Planning
Plan Processing Team
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100
Re: Adoption of Comprehensive Plan Compliance Agreement Amendment
City of Oviedo
Comprehensive Plan Amendment 96-1-02 (land use amendment) and 96-1
(policy amendment)
Case No. 97-0903GM
Dear Mr. Eubanks:
The City Council of the City of Oviedo adopted comprehensive plan compliance agreement
amendment (CPA96-1-02 and 96-1 policy) at an advertised public hearing on Monday,
November 17, 1997. This amendment was adopted consistent with Section 9J-ll.0131(2)(a),
(b), and ( c), Florida Administrative Code. The advertisement for this hearing was published in
the The Orlando Sentinel on November 9,1997.
True and correct copies of Ordinances No. 1040 and 1042 are attached. These ordinances are
consistent with the Stipulated Settlemen~ Agreement (Case No. 97-0903GM) executed between
the City of Oviedo and the Florida Department of Community Affairs. Ordinance No. 1042
changes the land use of approximately 727 acres known as River Oaks. Ordinance No. 1040
amends policies within the Comprehensive Plan.
Enclosed the City has provided true and correct copies of the adoption ordinances, copies of the
public notification, and five copies of the adopted compliance agreement plan amendments.
'"'\
.,
FDCA
November 21, 1997
Page 2 -
Also, copies of this package have also been mailed to the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council, Seminole County, and all applicable agencies listed under Section 9J-11.006, F .A.C.
and all intervenors.
Sincerely,
THE CITY OF OVIEDO
IJ~ZU~L~
Miriam W. Bruce
Mayor
attachments
C: ECFRPC
SJRWMD
Intervenors
FDOT, District V
Seminole County
I hereby attest and 'certify that this is
a true and correct copy of the original
document, filed at City Hall OvIedo
Florida I :. ' ·
i
Si ed:
ORDINANCE NO. 1040
AN 0 INANCE OF THE CITY OF OVIEDO, FLORIDA,
AMENDING SECfION 2 OF ORDINANCE NO. 1004 OF THE CITY
OF OVIEDO, FLORIDA, AMENDING MAP 1-3, MAP 1-3A, AND
POLICY 1-1.1.1.b.3 AND DELETING POLICY 1-1.3.5 OF THE LAND
USE ELEMENT IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY
OF OVIEDO, FLORIDA; PROVIDING SEPARABILITY;
CONFLICfS; AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Oviedo adopted Ordinance No. 1004 on December 16,
1996; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 1004 amended the Land Use Element of the
" Comprehensive Plan of the City of Oviedo by amending Map 1-3, creating Map 1-3A and
. Policy 1-l.l.l.b.3 and deleting Policy 1-1.3.5; and
WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Community Affairs issued a "Statement of
Intent to Find a Comprehensive Plan Amendment Not In Compliance" on February 13, 1997;
and
WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Community Affairs published a "Notice of
Intent to Find a Comprehensive Plan Amendment Not In Compliance" in the Orlando
Sentinel on February 14, 1997; and
~lftU1}
WHEREAS, the City of Oviedo and the Florida Department of Community Affairs
executed a Stipulated Settlement Agreement on September 24, 1997. therein addressing
remedial actions to bring the comprehensive plan amendment into compliance with Chapter
163, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code; and
WHEREAS, within sixty (60) days after execution of the Stipulated Settlement
Agreement, the City of Oviedo shall consider for adoption all remedial actions or plan
amendments as required and identified in the Stipulated Settlement Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to be adopted by this ordinance
complies with the remedial actions set forth within the Stipulated Settlement Agreement..
WHEREAS, This ordinance is adopted in confonnity with and pursuant to Chapter
.. 163, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 9J-II, Florida Administrative Code.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ENACfED BY THE CITY OF OVIEDO,
;: FLORIDA AS FOLLOWS:
i.
Section 1: Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element Policy I -I. I. I.b.3 is hereby
amended as described in Exhibit "A" (underscore -- new language; strike-through -- deleted
language).
"
Section 2: Inset "C" of Future Land Use Map Series Map 1-3 and Inset "C" of
Future Land Use Map Series Map 1-3A are hereby amended as depicted in Exhibit "B".
Section 3:
deleted.
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element Policy 1- 1.3.5 is hereby
Section 4: This ordinance amends portions of Section 2 of Ordinance No.1 004
pursuant to Sections I, 2, and 3 herein.
'1
:1
Section 5: The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separable and jf
any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance shaH for any reason be held to be
:: invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shaH not affect the validity of the remaining
sections, sentences, clauses, and phrases of this ordinance but they shaH remain in effect, it
being the legislative intent that this ordinance shaH stand not withstanding the invalidity of
any part.
i,
Section 6: All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be and the
same are hereby repealed.
Section 7: The effective date of these plan amendments shall be the date a final
order is issued by the Department of Community Affairs or Administration Commission
finding these amendments in compliance in accordance with Section 163.3 184( I )(b), Florida
Statutes, whichever occurs earlier. No development orders, development permits, or land
" uses dependent on these amendments may be issued or commence before they have become
effective. If a final order of noncompliance is issued by the Administration Commission,
i ~ these amendments may nevertheless be made effective by adoption of a resolution affirming
:: their effective status, a copy of which resolution shall be sent to the Department of
Community Affairs, Division of Resource Planning and Management, Plan Processing
Team.
I.
;
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 17thday of November, A.D., 1997.
!I
"
i;
FIRST READING:
10/6/97
I,
"
SECOND READING:
11/17/97
"
\fu1liW
il
!!
!
I
I
,
i
i
,
"
i ~
APPROVED BY MAYOR THIS
-1.I.t.lPA Y OF Nov",mh",r , A.D.,
1997
I!
Ii
i:
i'
,
.,
'i
'j
ATTEST:
J oJ-(
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Ordinance No.
1040 was by me, on the .J.8..t..tt<lay of November , A.D., 1997, posted in three (3)
places within the City of Oviedo, Florida to wit:
City Hall
Memorial Building. 42 S. Central Avenue
Riverside Park. Lockwood Boulevard
i IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal of said City
! of Oviedo, Florida, this 18tltJayof November ,A.D., 1997.
"
(DEPUTY)
.pJ._v
i
"
l,
ji
!:
j'
'j
:!
~
"
:l
"
'!
:1
,
:1
,
.,
,.
"
,I
:,
;,
(I)
~ft!f (2)
(3)
(42)
(51)
i
(6~)
:1
i,
"
..
!
'.
"
.!
,.
EXHIBIT "A"
Ii
';
j
'I
I 3. (CPA 96-1 Remedial Amendment; Ord. No. 1040; Amended 10/20/97) Transitional
(LDR-T). A category to create a density transition between areas designated Low Density
.. Residential and rural areas designated Rural or Suburban Estates within the City of Oviedo
or Seminole County Future Land Use Maps" ana to create a tnln3ition bCh.ccn Lo n Dcn3it)'
RC3iacntial dC3ignation !lI'ld the Econlockhatchcc Ri. cr. Transitional designations shall be
identified on the official land use map. The following Compatible Zone Districts and
Minimum Lot Size m Perimeter Buffer criteria shall apply:
Adjacent Compatible
Land Use/ Zoning
Designation Classification
[conlock
1: htttehee
1:
:! Ri ler (2) RCE
pun
Rural
Designation RCE
PUD
Suburban R-lAAA
" Estates PUD
"
Designation
Minimum
Minimum Perimeter
Lot Width (1) Buffer Width (I)
Minimum
Lot Size(l)
10,000 150 550 fect (3)
20,000 100 550 feet (3)
40,000 150 (42)
10,500 85 lQQ...fi....c 5 J.)( 6 ~)
20,000 100 (42)
10,500 85 (42)
Lot sizes are in square feet; lot widths are in linear feet.
Dig Econlockbatchcc Rj-,'cr and Little Econloekhatehee River
.\3 mell:3urcd from the 3trcam'3 cdgc of the Dig Econlockhatchce Ritcr or the Little
Econlockhatehcc Rivcr
Refer to the City of Oviedo Land Development Code
As measured from the perimeter property line. The buffer may be reduced by 25 feet
if adjacent to a local street. Where wetlands or conservation areas occur in rural
areas adjacent to a property, the buffer may be reduced by not more than 75 feet.
Buffer yard shall be designed to provide an opaque, visual obstruction to a height of
at least fifteen (15) feet and to impede noise and light emanating from urban areas.
To maintain promote a rural character, use of existing vegetation and trees shall be
first evaluated in a design. Stormwater facilities are prohibited within the buffer
yards. The Land Development Code shall provide buffer design criteria and
standards. '
'f
lon
.~.__........
......(
Rl
MAP 1-3
CITY OF OVIEDO
2010 LONG RANGE LAND USE
" INSET A
I
,
I.
II
I
I
I
I
."
I
.J
~
c ~~,'--____,
t'\. 1'U\At..1"1~1
L.DIIl'-'>r'fOtlQn"'J~II.a"_1
K.lfII ~conrn~lP'''''''.~1
I1Oi'\ 1"ICl100Grn~I""'I_1
0. ~
" t<lVmw.
""""
1'\.0 t'\..QMxmllSt
--- ~""""
r<J
~
::x:
H
lJ:l
H
r-3
lJ:l
:
\,i
.~/.~
.::....
/ ..
...- I
C.
~..\
I I) OVIEDO CROSSING TERRAce
r 2) wESTGATE ROA(j
INSETS A AND B INTENTIONALLY LEFT OUT
,I
FI
!,
:;r -
~i
"-
_---5\
~~
dE'
:v.E'
~'.
LONG RANGE LAND USE MAP
MAP 1-3
INSET C
'0
0 N
r-
r-
.
.
~
~
W~
~LDR
ITIIIIIIIIJ
Exhibit "8"
8.3
CONSERVA TION
LAND USE
LDR- T
ECON RIVER
PROTECTION ZONE
RURAL
LAND USE
lon
''''~''...IIIQ....
.........r
Al
MAP 1.3A
ClTY OF OVIEDO
2010 LONG RANGE LAND USE
~
~,c.............~____,
~
'" ~
.... f'U\A4.Ccl~1
UW\ L.O'WO&GIT'r~II'.l'I......-.c1
KlI\ ~ClOtSITl~I1..""'~1
HM HOHDOcsrT"r~I"..'I_1
o.~
~
"-<>UC
t'\.Q t'\.OMCQ)LIS(
___ ><w~
['1
><
::r:
H
OJ
H
o-:l
OJ
,I
~/ - '"
;:~
"../i.._ I'
l._ .
.r ~
..~~,
( I) OVIEDO CROSSING TERRAce
(2) WESTGATE ROAC,
INSETS A AND 8 iNTENTIONALLY LEFT OUT
""
l'
_""\......< . I 1
Cb~
~.'
~:
LONG RANGE' LAND USE MAP'
MAP 1-3A
INSET C
Exhibit "8"
84
'::i-
U
4.
en
r-
W
(j)
.0
o
.-
.-
..
.
I ... ... I CONSERVATION
_ RURAL
~ ,LDR-T
I ,
~ LDR
I hereby rJ~+"'SI :" ~d certify that this is
a true and correct 90PY of the original
document. filed at' City HaJl. Oviedo,
~=:51 lULJ()1.4 ry\'tO~ I ~'NANCE NO. 10"
City Clerk AN O~Irlt'~E OF THE CITY OF OVIEDO, FLORIDA,
,",_A_..t. . \ \._ d I-_j~ AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1007 OF THE CITY OF OVIEDO,
FLORIDA, SAID AMENDMENT AMENDING THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SHORT RANGE LAND USE MAP TO
CHANGE THE LAND USE OF APPROXIMATELY SEVEN
HUNDRED AND TWENTY-SEVEN ACRES GENERALL Y
LOCATED NORTH OF COUNTY ROAD 419 AND SOUTH OF
WILLINGHAM ROAD FROM CONSERVATION, LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL-TRANSITIONAL AND LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL TO CONSERVATION, RURAL, LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL-TRANSITIONAL, AND LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL; CONFLICTS; AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Oviedo adopted Ordinance No. 1007 on December 16,
1996; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 1007 amended Ordinance No. 896, said ordinance being
'. the comprehensive land planning ordinance of the City of Oviedo, Florida, and therein
changed the land use of approximately seven hundred and twenty-seven acres from Rural
to Conservation, Low Density Residential, and Low Density Residential-Transitional; and
~tm*
WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Community Affairs issued a "Statement of
Intent to Find a Comprehensive Plan Amendment Not In Compliance" on February 13, 1997;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Oviedo and the Florida Department of Community Affairs
executed a Stipulated Settlement Agreement, on September 24, 1997 therein addressing
remedial actions to bring the comprehensive plan amendment into compliance with Chapter
, 163, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code; and
i i . WHEREAS, within sixty (60) days after execution of the Stipulated Settlement
:!
; i Agreement, the City of Oviedo shall consider for adoption all remedial actions or plan
.! amendments as required and identified in the Stipulated Settlement Agreement; and
] !. WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to be adopted by this ordinance
.. complies with the remedial actions set forth within the Stipulated Settlement Agreement.
"
"
'.
WHEREAS, This ordinance is adopted in conformity with and pursuant to Chapter
163, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 9J...II, Florida Administrative Code.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY OF OVIEDO,
FLORIDA AS FOLLOWS:
Section t: The Short Range Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan is hereby
amended, and the land use of the property described in Exhibit "A" is hereby changed and
transferred from Conservation, Low Density Residential-Transitional, and Low Density
;! Residential to Conservation, Rural, Low Density Residential-Transitional, and Low Density
Residential as depicted in Exhibit "B".
i
Section 2:
This Ordinance amends and supersedes Ordinance No. 1007.
Section 3: The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separable and if
any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance shall for any reason be held to be
invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining
sections, sentences, clauses, and phrases of this ordinance but they shall remain in effect, it
being the legislative intent that this ordinance shall stand not withstanding the invalidity of
any part.
Section 4: Ail ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be and the
same are hereby repealed.
Section 5: The effective date ofLhese plan amendments shall be the date a final
order is issued by the Department of Community Affairs or Administration Commission
finding these amendments in compliance in accordance with Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida
Statutes, whichever occurs earlier. No development orders, development permits, or land
!: uses dependent on these amendments may be issued or commence before they have become
effective. If a final order of noncompliance is issued by the Administration Commission,
these amendments may nevertheless be made effective by adoption of a resolution affirming
their effective status, a copy of which resolution shall be sent to the Department of
" Community Affairs, Division of Resource Planning and Management, Plan Processing
1; Team.
;
~ ,
; ; PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 17t~ay of November, A.D., 1997.
,I
Ii
FIRST READING:
10/6/97
11/17/97
SECOND READING:
i
\itfuJi
APPROVED BY MAYOR THIS ....!LDA Y OF November , A.D., 1997
:
:~EST'
:i 0 4LllC1 C)11 { e1f~
II Y CLERK (DEPUTY)
II
i'
I
1!
"
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Ordinance No.
t 042 was by me, on the JB.... day of Novemher , A.D., 1997, posted in three (3)
places within the City of Oviedo, Florida to wit:
j:
"
I,
City Hall
Memorial Building. 42 S. Central Avenue
Riverside Park. Lockwood Boulevard
,I
ii
"
:1
.1
,.
j
i
i
I ,
, i
,
, !
I
I !
I I
! ,
,
i ;
!
~ i :
,
I
I
I ;
i ;
i
!
; !
I ,
; I
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal of said City
of Oviedo, Florida, this 18thdayof November , A.D., 1997.
;1
(DEPUTY)
j'
il
i!
I.
I
II
;1
1:
;
;;
~ i
"
"
,.
;:
I'
i!
I
"
"
. ' "'to uc-d-l}-/0..
ty Clerk of the City of Oviedo~3 -
S XH I 8 IT" ^ "
Leg~l D~scrlpcion - SemLnole rLying Ranch
......)
en '.-:::J
r: '-:::l
The Nort.hwesl.:. 1/4 of che Norchwese 1/4 of Section 20, Township ~1 Ul
Soueh, Range 32 East, <'l.nd the North 1/2 of Section 19, Township 01
South, Range 32 East, lying North of the North right-oE-way ~f
State Road No. 419, LESS the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeasc 1/4 ~f
the Northeast 1/4 of said Seceion 19, and LESS the.West 285.87 Ee2t 0
of the said North 1/2 of the said Section 19, and the Souehwest 1~
of Seccion 17, Township 21 South, Range 32 East, LESS the Soueh IV3 ~
of the Noreh 1/2 of che Southeast 1/4 of ehe Southwest 1/4 and LESS
the Sout.h 1/2 of the Southeast. 1/~ of the Soueh~ese 1/4 and LESS
the North 25.9 feet. for road right of way; also the North 3/4 of
the West. 1/4 of ehe Soueheast 1/4 of Sec~~on 17, Township 21 South,
Range 32 East, LESS the South 1/3 of,' the North,wese 1/4 of the
Southwest. 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of ehe said Section 17, and LESS
the North 25 feet and the East 2S feet for Willingham Road right-
~f-way and LESS ehe Southeast 5 acres described as follows: From
the South 1/4 corner of Section 17, Township 21 South, Range 32
3:ast:, run North 0045'03" We..st along the center of the said Section
376 _.84 feee. to the North line of the South 1/3 of t.he Northwest: 1/4
)f the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the said Se6tion 17,
:hence North 89020' 09" East along the North line 2~S. J 2 feet co the
?oint: of Beginning; thence continue North 89020'09" East 435.6 feet
:0 the West right-oE-way of Willingham Road; thence North 0034']0"
i~~. along said right-of-way of Willingham Road, 500 feet; thence
;dl.mtm'h 89020'09" West: 135.6 feet; thence South 0034'30" East 500
:eet to ehe Point of Beginning, Also. the Soueheast 1/4 of Section
.6, Township 21 South, Range 32 East, LESS t:he North 25 feel:. for
~oad Right-of-Way, also the Southwest 1/4 of Section 18, Township
~l South, Range .32 East, LESS the Noreh 1/4 of the said Sout.hwest
./4 and LESS the South 1309.5 feet of the West 285.87 feet of ehe
:aid Southwese 1/1.
E
eEL A:
IARCEL 8:
~e W~se 285.87 feee of the North 1/2 of Section 19, Township 21
:outh, Range 32 East., lying North of the North righ"t-of-way of
,::at.e.Road 1t419, also the South 1309.50 feet of the West. 285..87
eet of the Southwesc 1/4 of Section 18, Township 21 South, Range
2 Ease, also the Soueheast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 13,
'ownship 21 South, Range 31 East, lying Southeasterly of t.he
outheast righc-oE-way af Willingham Road and the NortJ"1east. J./4. of
he S6utheast 1/4 of Section 13. Tawnship 21 South, Range 31 Cast,
ying Sout.heasterly of the Southeast right.-of-way of (o/illingham
~ad: LESS a parcel de~cribed as follaws: ~rom the Ease 1/4 corner
f ehe said Sect.ion 13 run Sout.h 89012'30" West. 60.76 feet.; thence
oue:h 43016'25" W~st..' d10ng che center line of Willingham Road
4.3.21 feet.; t.hence ~;ouch 1604)')5" East. 25.0 feet to ehe I>oint of
eginning on the SouLl1ea:;terly r:-ighc"of-way of Willingham RO-'ld;
::::JO
0"'"
0"'"
..-.. ()
>
I
:::J
r...
("')
-00
:P-:::J
00
rt1 c.n
EXHIBIT "A ..
Legal Descr~pcion
Seminole Flying 1{.J.nch conc.inued
h" :e conc.inue Souc.h 16043'35" Ease 300.0 feet.; chence SQuch
3 0 16 ' 2 5" yl est, 3 0 0 . 0 E eel; the nee No r c h 4 6 0 4. 3 . 3 5" We s c 3 0 0 . 0 fee c. ;
hence No~th 43016'25" Ease 300.0 Eeec co the Point of Beginning.
.:
.~CEL c:
com t.he Southeast corner of Seceion 13, Township 21 Souc.h, Range
1 Ease, in Seminole Councy, Florida, run Noreh 1619.2 feee, andv
~st 1041.9 feet. to Easterly righc.-of-way of Willingham Road ~d~
Jint of Beg inning ,. run e hence North 450 J 3 ' Ease along s~d'-O
lsterly righe-of-way 300 feee; thence South 44027' East 300 fe~;~
Jence Souc.h 45033' West 300 teet; thence North 44027' West lBo
~et to ehe Point of Beginning. Reserving the Northwesc.erly 8 f~t
: said descripeion for widening of Willingham Road right. -of -way ~s
!corded in Public Records of Seminole County, Florida. ? ~
\RCEL 0:
-.,
I
Ie Northwest.. 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of
,,::cion 19, Township 21 South,. Range 32 East. All lying and being
tuate in Semiriole County, Florida.
~e~)'12~ld\~d.2'O
~
c;::; 0
0---'-'
0-"
--- (J
(....)
c::>
>
r
:::::J
("T1
(J
"'U 0
>:::J
GJO
("T1 (f)
SHORT RANGE LAND USE MAP
CPA 96-1-02
MAP 1- 2
Exhibit "8
81
0 CONSERVATION
. . LAND USE
W~ LDR- T
~ LDR
'0 ECON RIVER
0 N PROTECTION ZONE
.--
.--
illIIIIIII] RURAL
LAND U?E
..
'I
.
ii',
:~
..
Exhibit "8'
82
SHORT RANGE LAND USE MAP
B CONSER VA TlON
~
0 -
4. RURAL
en
l-
W ~
Cf) LOR- T
.0
0
..- 4: W&J
..- LOR
II ECON RIVER
PROTECTION ZONE
.
......
~
JA
c:;.,
\
%
C CONSERV A nON '
CM COMMERCIAL I
DMU DOWNTOWN MlXED-USE
HDR HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
IN INDUSTRIAL
LOR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
LDR- T LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL - TRANSmONAL
MeR MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
OFF OFFICE
P PUBUC
PUD PlANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
RL RURAL
INSET "A"
OR>>. 1031 - ADOPTED AUG. .. 111117
I"
1/
")
LOR
{CM
SR434 I L[ R
\,\~c ~J. I ~ =
\ L~R @: rn-:~ =h --.
~ r4 ~' ""';"~r ~ .
, I' ~ "==0= c I\p - U ~#\.~~ I
~ ~R r~ DR ~ ~~j'iR~~
u- ~ ~l' '= {] 'LU. EDu II *; ==_
~ ~ t.;ll ~ (c.0 ~ eM m Ii
II J ~ ~ ~ . - / / ~ [Q] ^ :a
-/ lj ~ )FFloir- I Je ~~ I... ~ p /C) !/;. C -&P
LOR~"""""'~ rl;M JlaJ. \ CM~ - "' RLV~ t9J,
1 M >Il P ~ I P ~~
- &;i 1L- I / LD r1IIfIiI rUlll l/ ff
;-:~ ~ '~~ __Lb~ I ~~Q.~ F -nr UI ~~ ?~OR lli~~r5(
( puo ./. OFF II If ~~ ~OR9 ~ ; \ run c<JI I
-. = '\\ \ 1Ji"\{'\: ' a UIl
'r I C II 1::: ~. 0 ~ } r C I Ul9-T ~:--r
q~c
J ~ r D / ~ ti! . . UlII >"::' ~ I LDR-T C LOR ,.I C r
~dh lh-~_~L ~'\il i1 ___~1I :,. &( l CM' ",0 1J." ~ I ~ - -=::. 0 ~
II ~ J._ M Ii ~_ P..t1~~ ~~~ ." -7/ RL c _?\r.
jl=i J ~ RL CMr ~ RL T~ ,{(drc~ ~ ~~~. Rive~ y'- LOR;P LOR "
~ Gj - I!'ZZTuu.I CJ b=:~- :d! \ \. - ~ a >0
L- eM Ii ~ ~. I . ~ ~~ iJ ~
~ -" -- ~ ~"2)r ~ ~'" C 'P "'~i6~
· , '7/ " --,: ~D ~ ~~ ~~ P, <,. &1. J. ~~ "
- ... .' HDR CM n-'~. ~rs ,;( % ""'=;~ ~ c;j 1) \ j u:
./r-.... . CM C
" ..:~~ )i~ I ,.~ 0 ~ I
~~ i · _ ~~g J~~lI-~1 ~ ' ~
d;;) L .n~CJ 0 < ~ puo
<:/ () '( EquinuB Greens
. C) C Live Oak Plantation) II
~ l\...#" ., A .
~
R
(I
1 J I
I
ADOPTED NOVEMBER 17, 1997
MAP 1-2
i
I
CITY OF OVIEDO
SHORT RANGE LAND USE
-'"
(
~
~'O~v=
RL~"- RL
C
1IlII-1IITI-~ =-
J
rC
.......... ":"..... ..
.'
.. .. .... .. .... .. .. ..
.. .. .. .... .... ....
...
(is'' .
. .~.
.... .. ......
.. ......
E22l -
U ....
~..
---
--
I.AlCE
IIIIIIIIIII-
~~
N
C)\)
~
..
g
...
~~
I~
I
~
~
I.-
o
~
I
,
:P
L === 1
Cj> Ir-, 10 \ 0 . U \
~~ "t ~~-~~ ,_
.. = - ~ IIld (.)
~ a: a: 0 e:3
- 9 . 9 ~D .~yp~ c f -' ~
(,) ~ \ ~~~
~ II III D.. III ii:
'~~ N~J ~: .~~
~ "~ C? III :'~
~ ~.~
(,) Ii D:1' ,.:3
I 0 :
11 7 a: " Tl
~ 9 D.. ~~( ~
t;" t 7 I -p ~ ':;"> Jr ~)
9 (,) jltJ~~ _
f:)J v c.: - --
\ '-c -J ~
~ ~ '~<,Ia: C 0 ~ \ ~'1
- .r-L I --~ If\~ ::> C>
== - 0 ~~~_ -. j .-_l/1.~ .
"--:: ~ ~ ."c.) ~I.l (,) 7- ~<ll .~
~= ~ ~ -~~ ~ l~~~~~~ '~I~
:.4 ..... ~ ~~. ~':;,:;,_ f~l! b
I ~ ~ ~O~ E .r~\. illt I...... ~ ffl
I~ -J -J iI: -J ~ Q. ~~/ "'i~ ~ "L.:C
L~ a: a:, ~ If "i;;==1~ ~ ~ nc..~ d
o E3 ~: Ai ~ ~ ~ ~y? ~ ~N ~
.. ~ ~ ~ll.{~;:: ,./ ~(i&~~ '~3~~ ~~ \0
I ~ J-"Z' ' ::b,...~ .... ~'J R:~ ~ ~ l
L.~' ~:(n "~ -11~1P a''''~ ~;U~' -
r~~ ~~[Q] I!!rl ~; ~~'m r~~ ~ ~~ 61~(~
- ~~,.. ~ ~~._Il.1L~~ '. ~; ~ ~ - w ,
~ ~~~'I;~~-;- al ~~, . I ) I~j~ _'
~('lc?~r~~ il"J~mr~~ i ~[ ~~- ~~~
IjC~~ ~ '-S., / 0 ~@ \ i~1
~ ~ ~ '" - i ~[][]3 ~ I ~ ~ ~I
II -- 1- ~ ,,OJ .--' 8 ~![]~ .- 2 D..~ 0 h
~ rIl 1 LL...J.II "'L. II. "--" ==all -II ~ - I.... Co
; If' I ~~ QIII Ell. IIII>- Ildr-lll il J ~ .' II
-=- V - Q ~ i~ U: ~~ ~'ii F=" I~'i- -.J ~
-~;= II ,~tfJl*11I1 ...I ~L1 itlD! r
r--- I ~ f1 []lZ5[? i' ~~I #I L~ ~ ~
I >> p: I ~~ ~ 0
a::ll ~~F1 i~,: ~; I O~ ~ ,J. ~ ~ I
gee.. 15- 0/1' ~rll~ :llI1O ~Vl' -l [;:
L::: n -J 'T,~ ~LlI3 ..! ~
'It I~I'~ ...:0.:::-. ii: LL t~ If ~
~t:::::: E1 - ~iln~~. ~ ~
a: ~~~ (~.~ i ~
en r;r[ "'"l...... -..... ~ ~& ~ ~::
'\ ri '.
9 I] g ~ ] [~, ;i
(~ D.. 1 "~
- r !~ ~
o
~
..... DB:ln1llOG'lllllCla
~-~
:v ~-
':-'::1
""'~
..
w
(J)
::;)
00
cZ
w<
>....1
ow
u.C)
OZ
<
>-a:
t::1-
oa:
o
:I:
(J)
~
~/'
Iii
$I
...:
....
ffi
m
~~
ii
~
Q
<l(
-'-""z
- --....r
!I
~
I
~
I
III
:J
z
o
E
o
~
~:J lfi
:ii! :J~ffi :2:
~ffi ffiffi2 9
,8 88M:! ~
80 Chen UJ
z xH! H!H!~ Q
O...l:i> >>0 I:::
~c(z~...t:t:ffi ~
>O~f5<l(ffiffiQ
II~Q~QQ~~(')~...I
88~1~~~;~i~~
to-
(,)~~~2;9~~~Q.~a!
~
-a
~::
~~:
k:-~ .'"
I':' .
. .
. . .
{j
· i
.~.
. .;.r.y
'0' '\:,% -:
,.:. .~. .
.. .
I i I
[]~~
~
~
(
.--J'
lCl'fU3$ ,GCU
I
n
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
: . Ci of Oviedo, Florida
I
I
I
I
I
.
omre enslve
an
Adopted
. M<alY 1 5, 1995
;J
;1
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
I
I
ADOPTING ORDINANCES
J
,
,I
,I
I
I
l
I
I
,I
I
1\
,I
I
I;
I
,I,
I
I
ORDINANCE NO. 936
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OVIEDO,
FLORIDA, AMENDING THE LAND USE, TRAFFIC
CIRCULATION, PUBLIC FACILITIES AND CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENTS OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING
SEPARABILITY, CONFLICTS, AND EFFECTIVE
DATE
WHEREAS, Chapter 163 of the Florida Statutes requires the City of Oviedo
to prepare and adopt a Comprehensive Plan of the type and in the manner as set
forth in said Chapter; and
WHEREAS, the City of Oviedo has responded to the Objections,
Recommendations, and Comments Report submitted by the state land planning
agency: and
WHEREAS, the City of Oviedo and its Land Planning Agency have complied
with the requirements of the aforesaid Chapter in amending the Comprehensive
Plan of Oviedo, FL; and
WHEREAS, the City of Oviedo has held a public hearing subject to Section
163.3184, F.S.; and
WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan to be adopted by this ordinance
complies with the requirements of Chapter 9J-5 of the Florida Administrative Code;
and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY OF OVIEDO,
FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: This ordinance is adopted in conformity with and pursuant to
Chapter 163, Florida Statutes.
Section 2: A copy of the Comprehensive Plan ai.lendments are attached
hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference.
Section 3: The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separable
and if any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance shall for any
reason be held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining sections, sentences, clauses, and phrases of this
ordinance but they shall remain in effect, it being the legislative intent that this
ordinance shall stand not withstanding the invalidity of any part.
Section 4: All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be and
the same are hereby repealed.
Section 5: This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
adoption.
I
I
I Ii
Ii
I I
I
I
I 'I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
.1
I
.f
.1
,I
I ,I
!
,
,
I II
Ii
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS!6 day of v(l/.~ ' A.D., 1995.
FIRST READING: I 6
SECOND READING: '5
APPROVED BY MAYOR THIS 1.:5' 'J-Ic
DAY OF '-f11 dr . A.D., 1995
~~79. h~
M OR
ATTEST:
~~i 1iu:J
CI CLERK .
. I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Ordinance
No. 936 was by me, on the i.Ii!!J day of c.?t1~ ' A.D., 1995,
posted in three (3) places within the City of Oviedo, FI Ida to WIt:
Citv Hall
Memorial Buildinq, 42 S. Central
U. S. Post Office. Geneva Drive
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal of
said City of Oviedo, Florida, this IhWi day of t../';(~ ,A.D., 1995.
c~~(~
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I,
I
,I
'I
,I
I
I
I
I
i
i!
"
j'
,I
j!
il
!!
ij
1:
I'
I:
II
,
ORDINANCE NO. 937
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OVIEDO,
FLORIDA, ANNEXING WITHIN THE CORPORATE
AREA OF THE CITY OF OVIEDO, FLORIDA, UPON
ADOPTION OF SAID ORDINANCE:
APPROXIMATELY THIRTY ACRES LOCATED AT
THE NORTH END OF PINE AVENUE, 1500 FEET
SOUTH OF S.R. 434; PROVIDING SEPARABILITY,
CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
OVIEDO, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
I
I.i, WHEREAS, there has been filed with the City Clerk of the City of
. Oviedo, Florida, a petition containing the names of the property owners in the area
Ii described herein requesting annexation to the corporate area of the City of Oviedo,
;, Florida, and requesting to be included therein; and
i ~
Ii
"
:1
I'
:!
i;
I:
WHEREAS, the Property Appraiser of Seminole County, Florida,
having certified that there are six property owners and that the authorized agent
for said property owners has signed the Petition for Annexation; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the property described
I: hereinafter is reasonably compact and contiguous to the corporate area of the City
jl of Oviedo, Florida; and
I
WHEREAS, the City of Oviedo, Florida, is in a position to provide
municipal services to the property described herein, and the City Council of the City
of Oviedo, Florida, deems it in the best interest of the City to accept said Petition
to annex said property"
I
I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
II THE CITY OF OVIEDO, FLORIDA:
I
I
i
i
I
1\
II
I:
Section 1: That the following described property situated in Seminole
County, Florida, be and the same is hereby annexed to and made a part of the City
of Oviedo, Florida, pursuant to the voluntary annexation provisions of Section
171.044, Florida Statutes:
I
II
From the S.E. Corner of the S.W. 1/4 of Section 4, Township 21
South, Range 31 East, run S. 89 D. 57' 49" W. along the South
Line of Said S.W. 1/4, a Distance of 513.38 Feet for a Point of
Beginning; Thence continue running S 89 D. 57' 49" W. a
Distance of 837.04 Feet; Thence Run N. 00 D. 12' 45" W. a
Distance of 1134.34 Feet; Thence run S. 89 D. 44' 00" along the
South Line of Oak Avenue as platted in CASA-VILLA HEIGHTS
and Recorded in P.B. 10 PG. 97 of the Public Records of
Seminole County, Florida a Distance of 1356.06 Feet to a Point
on the West Boundary of McKinley's Mill Subdivision as recorded
in P. B. 40, PG 86-88; Thence Run S. 00 D. 07' 53" E. along the
West Line of Said McKinley's Mill Subdivision a Distance of
722.22 Feet to a Point at the N.E. Comer of Bentley Oaks
I
I"
II
Ii
I
,I
.1
J
II
I
I
I
,I
I
'I,
I
I
.j
'1,
I.
I
I
Subdivision as recorded in P.B. 43. PG. 81 & 82 of the Public
Records of Seminole County; Thence Run Along the North Line
of Said Subdivision S. 89 D. 57' 49" W. a Distance of 562.31 Feet;
Thence Run S. 07 D. 05' 27" E. a Distance of 409.58 Feet to the
Point of Beginning (Containg 30.1 Acres).
I,
1,
Ii Section 2: That upon this ordinance becoming effective, the
:: property owners and any residents on the property described shall be entitled to all
I i the rights and privileges and immunities as are from time to time granted to
Ii residents and property owners of the City of Oviedo, Florida, and are further
i! provided in Chapter 171, Florida Statutes, and shall further be subject to the
" responsibilities of residence or ownership as may from time to time be determined
"I,.,'
by the goveming authority of the City of Oviedo, Florida, and the provisions of said
I: Chapter 171, Florida Statutes.
'I
I
I
II
'I
I:
II
ii
Section 3: The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be
separable and if any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance shall for
any reason be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining sections, sentences, phrases, or clauses of this ordinance,
but they shall remain in effect, it being the legislative intent that this ordinance shall
stand not withstanding the invalidity of any part,
Section 4: All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith
be and the same are hereby repealed.
Section 5: This ordinance shall become effective irr.mediately upon
its passage and adoption.
A.D., 1995.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS /5 Y1t day of
tf11A~
I
I
Ii
Ii
II
II
Ii
II
I
I,
I'
,I
I
I
I
I
i
I
"
FIRSTREAOING: 1{'~~, t96
SECOND READING: - ~'/'___ 199C{
APPROVED BY MAYOR THIS J,,') ~
DAY OF c.f1IIUj~ . A.D.,
1995.
1:c~'+' ~
VOR
).
I
,I
I,
I
I
I
,I.
"
,I
.1
I'
"
I
"
:1,
I
I'
I
I
ATTEST:
I ~)/ IM-I<L{~)
II C ~LERK
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct ~ the foregoing Ordinance
No, 937 was by me, on the l.12..E.. day of ~ ,AD., 1995, posted
in three (3) places within the City of Oviedo, FL, to t:
Citv Hall
Memorial Buildina, 41 S. Central
U.S. Post Office. Geneva Drive
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal of
said City of Oviedo, Florida, this It, Wr day of L11~t-,., AD., 1995.
AfrdltUJI~
CITY'CLERK of the City of Oviedo, FL
I
I!
),
I
,I
I
I
.1
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I,
I
I
I.
'1
ORDINANCE NO. 938
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OVIEDO,
FLORIDA, ANNEXING WITHIN THE CORPORATE
AREA OF THE CITY OF OVIEDO, FLORIDA, UPON
ADOPTION OF SAID ORDINANCE:
APPROXIMATELY FORTY-FOUR ACRES LOCATED
NORTH OF C.R. 419, WEST OF LOCKWOOD ROAD
EXTENSION, AND SOUTH OF EVANS STREET;
PROVIDING SEPARABILITY, CONFLICTS AND
EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
OVIEDO, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, there has been filed with the City Clerk of the City of
Oviedo, Florida, a petition containing the name of the property owner in the area
described herein requesting annexation to the corporate area of the City of Oviedo,
Florida, and requesting to be included therein; and
I WHEREAS, the Property Appraiser of Seminole County, Florida,
I having certified that there is one property owner and the agent for said property
jjowner has signed the Petition for Annexation; and
"
,.
ii WHEREAS, it has been determined that the property described
Ii hereinafter is reasonably compact and contiguous to the corporate area of the City
lof Oviedo, Florida, and it has further been determined that the annexation of said
l/property will eliminate an existing enclave; and
Ii WHEREAS, the City of Oviedo, Florida, is in a position to provide
Ii municipal services to the property described herein, and the City Council of the City
II of Oviedo, Florida, deems it in the best interest of the City to accept said Petition
lito annex said property. .
o!
I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
I THE CITY OF OVIEDO. FLORIDA:
Section 1: That the following described property situated in Seminole
I County, Florida, be and the same is hereby annexed to and made a part of the City
I of Oviedo, Florida, pursuant to the voluntary annexation provisions of Section
171.044, Florida Statutes:
I That part of Section 13, Township 21 South, Range 31 East,
II Seminole County, Florida, lying North of County Road 419, South
of Evans Street and West of Lockwood Road Extension.
I
Ii Section 2: That upon this ordinance becoming effective, the property
,. owner and any residents on the property described shall be entitled to all the rights
and privileges and immunities as are from time to time granted to residents and
property owner of the City of Oviedo, Florida, and are further provided in Chapter
171, Florida Statutes, and shall further be subject to the responsibilities of
I residence or ownership as may from time to time be determined by 'the governing
I authority of the City of Oviedo, Florida, and the provisions of said Chapter 171,
II Florida Statutes. .
"
I'
Ii
"
I:
Ii
i!
I.
I
I
I.
I
I
'I
I
I
I
,I
I
I
I'
"
I
I
I
I
'j
I
I
I Section 3: The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be
III separable and if any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance shall for
I any reason be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the
I validity of the remaining sections, sentences, phrases, or clauses of this ordinance,
il but they shall remain in effect, it being the legislative intent that this ordinance shall
I stand not withstanding the invalidity of any part.
II
II Section 4: All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith
I be and the same are hereby repealed.
/!
II
ii
:Ii Section 5: This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
I: its passage and adoption.
Ii
ji
'.
Ii A.D., 1995.
Ii
Ii
ii
Ii
d
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS /:5Y-11 day of
~~.
FIRST READING: '1f'~ ~' ~aq;
SECOND READING:._ ,~~~ /.~ <; 5
"
i:
d
APPROVED BY MAYOR THIS /:5 ~
DAY OF l/!1&f~ ,A.D.,
1995.
(J;!~4. ~c-/
M OR
i:
I:
,I
II
I
~ !
"
i'
!:
:,
'I
!:
II
II ATTEST:
ij ftrtlwA ~J
!1 CI CLERK
"
!!
i:
iJ
'I
I!
p
I:
I i I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Ordinance
: I No. 938 was by me, on the .&ti day of vjt1~ ___ ,A. D., 1995, posted
IJ in three (3) places within the City of Oviedo, FL, to w' :
i
,
,
i
I
I
I
,I
II
II
'I
I,
City Hall
Memorial Buildina. 41 S. Central
U.S. Post Office. Geneva Drive
I.
I
J
I.
I
I
"
I
"
I.
I
I
I
'I
,I,
I
I
I
I
if
II
j;
if
"
,I.
I
I
.1
f
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
I
I
I:
!I
ORDINANCE NO. 935
"
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OVIEDO,
FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 896 OF THE
CITY OF OVIEDO, FLORIDA, SAID ORDINANCE
BEING THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND PLANNING
ORDINANCE WITHIN THE CITY OF OVIEDO,
FLORIDA, SAID AMENDMENT CHANGING THE
LAND USE OF APPROXIMATELY 30 ACRES
LOCATED AT THE NORTH END OF PINE AVENUE,
1500' SOUTH OF S.R. 434 FROM SUBURBAN
ESTATES (COUNTY) TO LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL (CITY) PROVIDING SEPARABILITY,
CONFLICTS, AND EFFECTIVE DATE.
II
!j
BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OVIEDO,
FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: That Ordinance No. 896 of the City of Oviedo, Florida, being the
Comprehensive Land Planning Ordinance of the City of Oviedo, Florida, be and the
same is hereby amended as follows:
From the S.E. Comer of the S.W. 1/4 of Section 4, Township 21
South, Range 31 East, run S. 89 D. 57' 49" W. along the South
Line of Said S.W. 1/4 a Distance of 513.38 Feet for a Point of
Beginning; Thence continue running S 89 D. 57' 49" W. a
Distance of 837.04 Feet; ,Thence Run N. 00 D. 12' 45" W. a
Distance of 1134.34 Feet; Thence run S. 89 D. 44' 00" E. along the
South Line of Oak Avenue as platted in CASA-VILLA-HEIGHTS
and recorded in P.B. 10, PG. 97 of the Public Records of
SemInole City, Florida a Distance of 1356.06 Feet to a Point on
the West Boundary of McKinley's Mill SubdivIsion as recorded in
P.B.40, PG 86-88; Thence Run S. 00 D. 07' 53" E. along the West
line of said McKinley's Mill Subdivision a Distance of 722.22 Feet
to a Point at the N.E. Corner of Bentley Oaks Subdivision as
recorded in P.B. 43, PG. 81 & 82 of the Public Records of
Seminole County; Thence Run Along the North Line of Said
Subdivision S. 89 D. 57' 49" W. a Distance of 562.31 Feet;
Thence Run S. 07 D. 05' 27" E. a Distance of 409.58 Feet to the
Point of Beginning (Containing 30.1 acres)
I
I
! be and the same is her~y changed and transferred from Suburban Estates
'I (County) to Low Density Residential (City).
I Section 2: The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separable
! and if any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance shall for any reason
II be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decisions shall not affect the validity of the
: remaining sections, sentences, phrases, or clauses of this ordinance, but they shall
remain in effect, it being the legislative intent that this ordinance shall stand
notwithstanding the invalidity of any part.
.,
Ii
I.
I
I
,I
,
,I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I.
I
I
I
I.
ij
I!
II
II
!I Section 3: All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be and
II the same are hereby repealed.
:1
!i Section 4: This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon the
'I' State Land Planning Agency's issuance of a final order determining the adopted
II amendmeht to be in compliance in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida
~; Statutes, or upon the Administration Commission's issuance of a final order
il determining the adopted amendment to be in compliance in accordance with
;; Section 163.3184, whichever occurs first.
i!
! ~
FIRST READING:
11Ut // 1C;96
vI1{~ /5. /795
"
SECOND READING:
,
'j
I,
li
ii
'I
II
I
APPROVED BY MAYOR THIS /.... ') Y1c
DAY OF vt'idr ' A.D., 1995
ft~A &..J
AYOR
ATTEST:
~ &d~11(
! C', CLERK
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct ~OregOing Ordinance
No. 935 was by me, on the /~YII day of , A.D., 1995,
posted in three (3) places within the City of Oviedo, Flonda to wit:
I
I!
II
'I
II IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal of
said City of Oviedo, Florida, this ili:!!2 day of ~ ' A.D., 1995.
!
I ~-I1
!jlj
City lerk of the City of
OViedo, FL
I
,j
Citv Hall
Memorial Buildina, 42 S. Central
U. S. Post Office. Geneva Drive
I.
I
I
I.
I
I.
'1
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
.1.
I
I
I
I
ORDINANCE NO. 941
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OVIEDO,
FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 916 OF THE
CITY OF OVIEDO, FLORIDA, SAIO ORDINANCE
BEING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WITHIN
THE CITY OF OVIEDO, FLORIDA, SAID
AMENDMENT CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFI-
CATION OF APPROXIMATELY THIRTY ACRES
LOCATED AT THE NORTH END OF PINE AVENUE,
1500 FEET SOUTH OF S.R. 434 FROM A-1,
AGRICULTURE (COUNTY) TO R-1, RESIDENTIAL
(CITY) AND TO W-1, WETLANOS (CITY);
PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS, AND
EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OVIEDO,
FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: That Ordinance No. 916 of the City of Oviedo, Florida, being
the Land Development Code of the City of Oviedo, Florida, be and the same is
hereby amended as follows:
"'
From the S.E. Comer of the S.W. 1/4 of Section 4, Township 21
South, Range 31 East, run S. 89 D. 57' 49" WI along the South
Line of Said S.W. 1/4, a Distance of 513.38 Feet for a POint of
Beginning; Thence continue running S. 89 D. 57' 49" W. a
Distance of 837.04 Feet, Thence Run N 00 D. 12'45" W. a Distance
of 1134.34 Feet; Thence run S. 890. 44'00" E. along the South
LIne of Oak Avenue as platted In CASA VILLA HEIGHTS and
Recorded in P.B. 10 PG. 97 of the Public Records of Seminole
County, Florida a Distance of 1356.06 Feet to a Point on the West
Boundary of McKinley's Mill Subdivision as recorded in P.B. 40,
PG. 86-88; Thence Run S. 00 D. 07' 53" E. along the West Line of
said McKinley's Mill Subdivision a Distance of 722.22 Feet to a
Point at the N.E. Comer of Bentley Oaks Subdivision as recorded
in P.B. 43 Pg. 81 & 82 of the Public Records of Seminole County;
Thence Run Along the North Line of Said Subdivision S. 89 D. 57'
49" W. a Distance of 562.31 Feet; Thence Run S. 07 D. 05' 27" E.
a Distance of 409.58 Feet to the Point of Beginning. (Containing
30.1 Acres).
be and the same are hereby changed and transferred from zoning classification A-1
Agriculture (County) 28.8 acres to R-1, Residential (City) and 1.3 acres to W-1,
Wetlands, as generally shown in Exhibit "A".
Section 2: The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separable
and if any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance shall for any reason
I be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining sections, sentences, phrases or clauses of this ordinance, but they shall
I.
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
remain in effect, it being the legislative intent that this ordinance shall stand
notwithstanding the invalidity of any part.
Section 3: All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict be and the same
are hereby repealed.
Section 4: This ordinance shall become effective on that date Ordinance
No. 935, Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA-95-1-01 becomes effective.
I' PASSED AND ADOPTED this /..,<{1/-4 day of vfI( ff '/ '
c41( I!{t, II ;qq, <
SECOND READING: r.--1'/!t1f' /..~, lo/ir=)
, A.D., 1995.
FIRST READING:
APPROVED BY MAYOR THIS ~ 'K
ATTEST:
CI~rf:iI &JL?({
, A.D., 1995.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Ordinance
No. 941 was by me, on the //'W:day of ~~~ ' AD., 1995,
posted in three (3) places within the City of Oviedo, lorida, to wit:
City Hall
Memorial BuildinQ. 42 S. Central
U.S. Post Office. Geneva Drive.
IJ
I-
I
I
I-
I
,-
I
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal of
the City of Oviedo, Florida, this ~ day of C.41f~j?-. , AD.,
1995.
~Ar4/iv.1~
CITY LERK of the City of Oviedo, FL
,
I,
I
I
I.
I
I.
I
I'
I
"
I
I
I
I
,I
I
I
I
I
ii
I
I
ORDINANCE NO. 942
II
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OVIEDO,
FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 896 OF THE
CITY OF OVIEDO, FLORIDA, SAID ORDINANCE
BEING THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND PLANNING
ORDINANCE WITHIN THE CITY OF OVIEDO,
FLORIDA, SAID AMENDMENT CHANGING THE
LAND USE OF APPROXIMATELY NINETY.TWO
ACRES LOCATED EAST OF C.R. 419, WEST OF
LOCKWOOD ROAD. AND SOUTH OF EVANS
STREET FROM RURAL (COUNTY) TO LOW
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (CITY) PROVIDING
SEPARABILITY, CONFLICTS, AND EFFECTIVE
DATE.
, BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OVIEDO,
,i FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: That Ordinance No. 896 of the City of Oviedo, Florida, being the
Comprehensive Land Planning Ordinance of the City of Oviedo, Florida, be and the
same is hereby amended as follows:
,I
!i
That part of Section 14 lying South of Evans Street and North of
Highway 419 and that part of the South 3/4 of Section 13 lying
West of Lockwood Road and North of Highway 419 less the
Northern 50' thereof, aU lying within Township 21 S, Range 31 E
in Seminole County, Florida, containing approximately ninety-
two (92) acres
I'. be and the same is hereby changed and transferred from Rural (County) to Low
I Density Residential (City)
Section 2: The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separable
and if any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance shall for any reason
be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decisions shall not affect the validity of the
remaining sections, sentences, phrases, or clauses of this ordinance, but they shall
II remain in effect, it being the legislative intent that this ordinance shall stand
notwithstanding the invalidity of any part. .
I
!I
Section 3: All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be and
the same are hereby repealed.
Section 4: This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon the
State Land Planning Agency's issuance of a final order determining the adopted
amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida
Statutes, or upon the Administration Commission's issuance of a final order
determining the adopted amendment to be in compliance in accordance with
Section 163.3184, whichever occurs first.
I
I
I
I
I
,I,
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I.
I
.1,
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
II
I
I
,I
I'
I
FIRST READING: ~ 1/ /0;96
SECOND READING: vf'{ ~ /5, /995
APPROVED BY MAYOR THIS. /S '!--Iv
,
DAY OF r.41~ . A.D., 1995
;~A.~
OR
A~l~J
CI~ CLERK
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Ordinance 5
No, 942 was by me, on the i.fJ::!!day of C111~ ' A.D., 199;,
posted in three (3) places within the City of Oviedo, Flo Ida to wit: c.e.
Citv Hall
Memorial Buildina, 42 S, Central
U. S, Post Office, Geneva Drive
I
I
II
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal of
said City of Oviedo, Florida, this l!i!fJday of vII1.~ ' A.D., 1995.
~-A/~dw~
City Clerk of the City of
Oviedo, FL
i
I!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:1
I
I
I
I
ORDINANCE NO. 943
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OVIEDO,
FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 896 OF THE
CITY OF OVIEDO, FLORIDA, SAIO ORDINANCE
BEING THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND PLANNING
ORDINANCE WITHIN THE CITY OF OVIEDO,
FLORIDA, SAID AMENDMENT CHANGING THE
LAND USE OF APPROXIMATELY FOURTEEN
ACRES LOCATED SOUTH OF WEST MITCHELL
HAMMOCK ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1,300 FEET
WEST OF S.R. 434, .FROM RURAL TO COMMERCIAL
PROVIDING SEPARABILITY, CONFLICTS, AND
EFFECTIVE DATE.
"
BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OVIEDO,
II FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Ii
il
I,
':
I
Section 1: That Ordinance No. 896 of the City of Oviedo, Florida, being the
Comprehensive Land Planning Ordinance of the City of Oviedo, Florida, be and the
same is hereby amended as follows:
I,
;:
II
The East 541.22 feet of the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 21,
Township 21 South, Range 31 East, Seminole County, Florida
lying South of WEST MITCHELL HAMMOCK ROAD LESS the
North 400.00 feet of the East 200.00 feet thereof AND SUBJECT
to that part of the following described DRAINAGE AND RIGHT OF
WAY EASEMENT crossing said property; From the northeast
corner of Section 21 TownshIp 21 South, Range 31 East,
Seminole County, Florida, run N. 89 degrees 39' 54" W., along
the North line of the NE 1/4 of said Section 21, 200.00 feet, run
thence S. 00 degrees 24' 00" W. 75.00 feet to the Southerly Right
of Way of WEST MITCHELL HAMMOCK ROAD and the POINT OF
BEGINNING, run thence S. 00 degrees 24' 00" W. 16.93 feet, run
thence S. 81 degrees 43' 29" W. 185.91 feet, thence S. 78 degrees
25" 31" W. 113.80 feet, thence S. 11 degrees 34" 29" E. 149.21
feet, thence N. 89 degrees 39' 54" W. 386.46 feet, thence N. 03
degrees 57' 12" W. 95.98 feet to said Southerly right of way line
of WEST MITCHELL HAMMOCK ROAD, thence run along said
right of way line the following courses, Northeasterly 181.68 feet
along the arc of a curve concave Northwesterly having a radius
of 1775.00 feet, a central angle of 05 degrees 51' 52" and a chord
of 181.60 feet that bears N. 83 degrees 06' 50" E., thence N. 00
degrees 20' 06" E. 34.92 feet, thence N. 78 degrees 25' 31" E.
294.56 feet, thence run S. 89 degrees 39' 54" E. 189.65 feet to the
POINT OF BEGINNING.
;!
i:
':
be and the same is hereby changed and transferred from Rural to Commercial.
I
I
I
I
I i'
II
II
Ii
I, Ii
II
:!
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I
I
I
Section 2: The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separable
and if any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance shall for any reason
, be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decisions shall not affect the validity of the
remaining sections, sentences, phrases, or clauses of this ordinance, but they shall
remain in effect, it being the legislative intent that this ordinance shall stand
notwithstanding the invalidity of any part.
Section 3: All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be and
the same are hereby repealed.
Section 4: This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon the
State land Planning Agency's issuance of a final order determining the adopted
amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida
Statutes, or upon the Administration Commission's issuance of a final order
determining the adopted amendment to be in compliance in accordance with
Section 163.3184, whichever occurs first.
FIRST READING:
'-1Z( ~ () / CJ 7 6
vtltrJJf 1-5, /9Cfo
SECOND READING:
APPROVED BY MAYOR THIS / \.) 'f1\.-
DAY OF ~ . A.D., 1995
{J~/l ~
ATTEST:
c~f!;:/ ~
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct co y of the foregoing Ordinance
No. 943 was by me, on the I..i.R.!!i day of . , A.D., 1995,
posted in three (3) places within the City of Oviedo, FI rid a to wit:
Citv Hall
Memorial.Buildina. 42 S. Central
U. S. Post Office. Geneva Drive
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~ :
,;
Ii
p
:j
!!
~ :
ORDINANCE NO. 944
ii
i:
"
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OVIEDO,
FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 896 OF THE
CITY OF OVIEDO, FLORIDA, SAID ORDINANCE
BEING THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND PLANNING
ORDINANCE WITHIN THE CITY OF OVIEDO,
FLORIDA, SAID AMENDMENT CHANGING THE
LAND USE OF APPROXIMATELY FORTY-THREE
ACRES LOCATED EAST OF GREENEWAY, WEST
OF W. BROADWAY STREET, OFF SUGAR MILLS
ROAD FROM OF (COUNTY) TO OF (CITY);
APPROXIMATELY TWENTY-SEVEN ACRES
LOCATED EAST OF GREENEWAY, WEST OF W.
BROADWAY STREET, AND NORTH OF RED BUG
LAKE ROAD FROM HIP-PO (COUNTY) TO PUD
(CITY) AND APPROXIMATELY SIXTEEN AND ONE-
HALF ACRES LOCATED EAST OF GREENEWAY,
WEST OF W. BROADWAY STREET, AND NORTH OF
RED BUG LAKE ROAD FROM OF (COUNTY) TO OF
(CITY) , AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY
METES AND BOUNDS AND DEPICTED HEREIN;
PROVIDING SEPARABILITY, CONFLICTS, AND
EFFECTIVE DATE.
p
!!
:!
;j
Ii
.. 42.84 acres located east of Greeneway, west of W. Broadway Street, off Sugar Mill
Road from OF (County) to OF (City); and
:, 27.17 acres located east of Greeneway, west of W. Broadway Street, and north of
Red Bug Lake Road from HIP-PO (County) to PUO (City); and
16.46 acres located east of Greeneway, west of W. Broadway Street, and north of
Red Bug lake Road from OF (County) to OF (City)
.. more particularly described by metes and pounds in Schedule "A" and depicted in
Schedule "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 2: The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separable
and if any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance shall for any reason
be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decisions shall not affect the validity of the
Ii remaining sections, sentences, phrases, or clauses of this ordinance, but they shall
,i remain in effect, it being the legislative intent that this ordinance shall stand
notwithstanding the invalidity of any part.
Section 3: All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith be and
the same are hereby repealed.
II
il
i
I
I Section 4: This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon the
,I State Land Planning Agency's issuance of a final order determining the adopted
" amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida
I,: Statutes, or upon the Administration Commission's issuance of a final order
determining the adopted amendment to be in compliance in accordance with
II Section 163.3184, whichever occurs first.
II
/.
II
,I
l'
~ I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FIRST READING:
SECOND READING:
I,
'I
Ii
j:
!:
,
I'
ii
Ii
,I
"
,
,.
Ii
Ii
Ii
II
I:
II
I
I ATTEST:
Ic~j~
l{J(CUj I) 1~75
Lf'.{ cur I~, /995
APPROVED BY MAYOR THIS /_t) '1-1,
DAY OF r./lfofJ' ,A.D., 1995
~~.4-. h,~
OR
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and cerrec.t ~ of the foregoing Ordinance
No. 944 was by me, on the /~'fI1 day of ~ . AD., 1995,
posted in three (3) places within the City of Oviedo, Flo Ida to wit:
Citv Hall
Memorial Buildina. 42 S. Central
U. S. Post Office. Geneva Drive
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal of
said City of Oviedo, Florida, this Jil!!:day of '111 ~ ,AD., 1995.
fJ~
Cit Clerk of the City of
Oviedo, FL
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
U/lC/~','; '- 'i . .0' /;
/.:, 'I
SCHEDULE "A"
42_84 acres located east of Greeneway. west of W. Broadway Street, off Sugar MiU
Road from OF (County) to OF (City)
Tax Parcel No. 16-21-31-300-0270-0000-0-7
seCtion 16, Township 21 South. Range 31 East, Northwest 1/4 of Southwest 1/4 of Northwest
1/4 (Less Expressway)
Tax Parcel No. 16-21-31-300-0280-0000-0-5
Section 16, Township 21 South, Range 31 East, South 474.13 Feet of West 478.12 Feet
of Northeast 1/4 of Southwest 1/4 of Northwest 1/4 (5.20 Acres)
Tax Parcel No. 16-21-31-3oo-028A-OOOO-O-4
Section 16, Township 21 South, Range 31 East, Northeast 1/4 of Southwest 1/4 of Northwest
1/4 (Less South 474.13 Feet of West 478.12 Feet)
Tax Parcel No. 16-21-31-300-0320-0000-0-7
Section 16, T~wnship 21 South, Range 31 East, North 1/2 of Southeast 1/4 of Southwest 1/4 of
Northwest 1/4
Tax Parcel No. 16-21-31-300-032A-OOOO-0-6
Section 16, Township 21 South, Range 31 East, North 1/2 of Southwest 1/4 of Southwest
1/4 of Northwest 1/4 (Less Expressway)
Tax Parcel No. 16-21-31-300-032B-0000-O-5
Section 16, Township 21 South, Range 31 East, South 1/2 of Southeast 1/4 of Southwest 1/4 of
Northwest 1/4
Tax Parcel No. 16-21-31-300-032C-OOOO-0-4
Section 16, Township 21 South, Range 31 East, South 1/2 of Southwest 1/4 of Southwest 1/4 of
Northwest 1/4 (Less Expressway)
Tax Parcel No. 16-21-31-SCA-OOOO-1180":0-S
North IlL of Lot 118 (Less Expn::'~:)way) Slavia Colony CO.s Subdivision, Plat Book 2, Page 71
Page 1 of 4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Tax Parcel No. 16-21-31-5CA-OOOO-118A-O-4
South 1/2 of Lot 118 and Begin at the Southwest Comer of Lot 119 Run Est 248.65 Feet North
649 Feet West 260.24 Feet South 649 Feet to Beginning Slavia -Colony Co.s Subdivision, Plat
Book 2. Page 71 (Less Expressway)
Tax Parcel No. 16-21-31-5CA-OOOO-1190-O-3
Part of Lot 119 Described as Beginning 611 Feet North of Southeast Comer Run West 107.76
Feet South 250 Feet West 300 Feet North to North Line Lot 119 East to a Point North of
Beginning South to Beginning Slavia Colony Co.s Subdivision., Plat Book 2, Page 71
27.17 acres located east of Greeneway, west of W. Broadway Street, and north of
Red Bug Lake Road from HIP.PO (County) to PUD (City)
Tax Parcel No. 16-21-31-5CA-OOOO-OO 1 A-O-2
North 460 Feet of Lot 1 West of Railway Slavia Colony Co.s Subdivision., Plat Book 2, Page 71
Tax Parcel No. 16-21-31-5CA-OOOO-OO2A-O-l
Lots 2 and 3 (Less Begin Southeast Comer Lot 2 Run North 380 (M) Feet West 281.764 South
73 Degrees 35 Minutes 11 Seconds West 428.875 Feet South 227 Feet West to Northerly Line
Canal Southerly Ak>ng Northerly Line Canal to a Point West of Beginning East to Beginning
and Roads) Slavia Colony Co.s Subdivision, Plat Book 2, Page 71
Tax Parcel No. 16-21-31-5CA-0000-0060-O-2
Lots 6 and 7 East of Expressway Slavia Colony Co"s Subdivision., Plat Book 2, Page 71
Tax Parcel No. 16-21-3 1-5CA-OOOO-O 1 90-0-5
Lot 19 South of North Line ofCana! and North ofNonh Right-of-Way Red Bug Lake Road and
West 70 Feet of Lot 20 south of North Line ofCana! and North of North Right-ofWay Red Bug
Lake Road (Less West 200 Feet and Begin 200 Feet East of Northwest Comer Lot Run East
303.82 Feet South 52 Degrees 15 Minutes 53 Seconds East 99.19 Feet South 51 Degrees 41
Minutes 30 Seconds East 100 Feet South 52 Degrees 45 Minutes 46 Seconds East 79.88 Feet
South 158.10 Feet North /0 Degrees 26 Minutes 25 Seconds West 196.99 Feet North 82
Degrees 53 Minutes 52 Seconds West 202.96 Feet North 62 Degrees 10 Minutes 10 Seconds
West to a Point South 1 Degree 38 Minutes East of Beginning North 1 Degree 38 Minutes West
to Beginning and R.oad) Slavia Colony Co.s Subdivision, Plat Book 2, Page 71
Page 2 of 4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Tax Parcel No. ]6-21-3 ]-SCA-OOOO-O1 9A-0-4
West 200 Feet of Lot 19 (Less Road) Slavia Colony CO.s Subdivision, Plat Book 2, Page 71
Tax Parcel No. 16-21-3 I -SCA-OOOO-O I 98-0-3
Part of Lots 19 and 20 Described as Beginning 200 Feet East of Northwest Comer Lot Run East
303.82 Feet South 52 Degrees 15 Minutes 53 Seconds East 99 .19 Feet South 5 I Degrees 41
Minutes 30 Seconds East 100 Feet South 52 Degrees 45 Minutes 46 Seconds East 79.88 Feet
South 158.10 Feet North 76 Degrees 26 Minutes 25 Seconds West 196.99 Feet North 82
Degrees 53 Minutes 52 Seconds West 202.96 Feet North 62 Degrees 10 Minutes 10 Seconds
West to a Point South 1 Degree 38 Minutes East of Beginning North 1 Degree 38 Minutes West
to Beginning Slavia Colony Co.s Subdivision, Plat Book 2. Page 71
16.46 acres located east of Greene way. west ofW. Broadway Street, and north of
Red Bug Lake Road from OF (County) to OF (City)
Tax Parcel No. ]6-21-31-5CA-OOOO-OOIB-O-l
Begin i04.792 Feet East of Southwest Corner of No 460 Feet of Lot 1 Run East 300 Feet South
23 Degrees 48 Minutes 16 Seconds West 870.532 Feet North 61 Degrees 38 Minutes 55 Seconds
West 179.863 Feet North 55 Degrees 43 Minutes 20 Seconds West 96.154 Feet North 23
Degrees 45 Minutes East 717.829 Feet to Beginning (Less Part in Expressway and Red Bug
Lake Road) Slavia Colony Co.s Subdivision, Plat Book 2, Page 71
Tax Parcel No. 16-21-31-5CA-OOOO-OO20-O-I
Begin Southwest Comer of North 460 Feet of Lot 1 Run East 104.792 Feet South 23 Degrees
45 Minutes West 165 Feet West 731.306 Feet North 227 Feet North 73 Degrees 35 Minutes 11
Seconds East 428.875 Feet East 281.764 Feet South 197.31 Feet to Beginning Slavia Colony
Co.s Subdivision, Plat Book 2, Page 71
Tax Parcel No. 16-21-31-5CA-OOOO-020C-O-O
Begin 104..792 Feet East and South 23 Degrees 45 Minutes West 165 Feet of Southwest Comer
of North 490 Feet of Lot 1 Run South 23 Degrees 45 Minutes 0 Seconds West 552.829 Feet
North 51 Degrees 6 Minutes 7 Seconds West 240.581 Feet North 53 Degrees 5 Minutes 19
Seconds West 223..627 Feet North 51 Degrees 52 Minutes 11 Seconds West 357..941 Feet East
870.25 Feet to Beginning Slavia Colony Co.s Subdivision, Plat Book 2, Page 71
Page 3 of 4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Tax Parcel No. H5-21-31-5CA-OOOO"'()20E"'()-8
Part of Lot 20 Described as Beginning 117.41 Feet South of Northwest Comer Run South 52
Degrees 13 Minutes 49 Seconds East 153.74 Feet South 53 Degrees 26 Minutes 57 Seconds East
223.63 Feet South 51 Degrees 27 Minutes 45 Seconds East 51.84 Feet South I Degree 4 Minutes
East 33.75 Feet Nonh 50 Degrees 10 Minutes 40 Seconds West 19.36 Feet North 54 Degrees 11
Minutes 28 Seconds West 99.87 Feet Nonh 49 Degrees 58 Minutes 26 Seconds West 100..08
Feet Nonh 55 Degrees 37 Minutes 52 Seconds West 85.15 Feet North 52 Degrees 45 Minutes 46
Seconds West 115 Feet Nonh 51 DegreeS 41 Minutes 30 Seconds West 9.38 Feet North 34.72
Feet to Beginning (Less West 70 Feet) Slavia Colony CO.s Subdivision, Plat Book 2. Page 71
Tax Parcel No. 16-2J-31-5CA-OOOO"'()20F"'()-7
West 1/2 of Lot 20 South of A Line Described as Beginning 152.13 Feet South of Northwest
Comer Run South 51 Degrees 41 Minutes 31 Seconds East 9.38 Feet South 52 Degrees 45
Minutes 46 Seconds East 115 Feet South 55 Degrees 37 Minutes 52 Seconds East 85.15 Feet
South 49 Degrees 58 Minutes 26 Seconds East 100.08 Feet South 54 Degrees 1 J Minutes 28
Seconds East 99.87 Feet South 50 Degrees 10 Minutes 40 Seconds East 19.36 Feet (Less West
70 Feet and Part South of Red Bug Lake Road) Slavia Colony Co.s Subdivision, Plat Book 2.
Page 71
Page 4 of 4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
FOR
CITY OF OVIEDO, FLORIDA
Prepared by the LAND PLANNING AGENCY
On behalf of THE OVIEDO CITY COUNCIL
MAY, 1995
"Preparation of portions of this document was aided through financial assistance received
from the State of Florida under the Local Government Comprehensive Planning Assistance
Program authorized by Chapter 88-555, Laws of Florida and administered by the Florida
Department of Comunity Affairs."
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF OVIEDO, FLORIDA
CITY OFFICIALS
MAY, 1995
MAYOR: Judith A. Green
OVIEDO CITY COUNCIL:
Thomas A. Hagood, Jr., Chairman
John Benson, Vice-Chairman
Phillip E. Hampton
Michael S. Craig
Michael Ragsdale
LAND PLANNING AGENCY:
Clifford Collins, Chairman
John Airiale
Michael Brozzo
Robert Dallari
Robert Herrmann
Larry Vaughn
Cay Westerfield
CITY MANAGER: V. Eugene Williford, III
CITY CLERK: Cynthia Bonham
CITY ATTORNEY: William L. Colbert, Esq.
POLICE CHIEF: Dennis Peterson
FIRE CHIEF: Wayne Martin
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS: Charles Smith
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE: Charles Hamill, III
DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & ZONING: David B. Moon
2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION NUMBER & TITLE
PAGE
List of Maps . . . . . . . 5
List of Figures. . . . . .6
List of Tables. . . . . .7
Purpose ..........8
Definitions. . . . . . . .
(not included; all definitions shall comply with FS
Chapter 163 and Administrative Rule 9J-5)
General
A) The Support Documents are separate, and will not be
adopted as part of the Comprehensive Plan.
B) Implementation. . . . . . . . . . . . . .16
C) Monitoring and Evaluation ... .25
(The last Evaluation & Appraisal Report was
submitted in December, 1988 and is not included
herein.)
D) Population Projections. . . . . . . 28
Concurrency Management. . . .17
Future Land Use Element . . . .Chapter 1
Traffic Circulation. . . . . . . . . . . .Chapter 2
Mass Transit
(Not required; population is less than 50,000)
Ports, Aviation, and Related Facilites
(Not required; populatiom is less than 50,000)
Housing Element. . . . . . . , . . . . .Chapter 3
-4-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SECTION NUMBER & TITLE
PUBLIC UTILITIES: . . . . . . . . . .Chapter 4
Wastewater
Solid Waste
Drainage and Natural Groundwater
Aquifer Recharge
Potable Water
Coastal Management (Not Required)
Conservation Element. ..... .Chapter 5
Recreation & Open Space .., .Chapter 6
Intergovernmental Coordination
Element. . . . . . . . . . . . .. Chapter 7
Capital Improvements Element .Chapter 8
Optional Elements
(No Optional Elements included)
Consistency with State Comprehensive Plan
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MAPS
ELEMENT TITLE
PAGE
LAND USE
1-1 Annexation Boundary 1-19
1-2 1996 Future land Use Map 1-29
1-3 2010 long Range land Use Map 1-30
1-4 Environmental Overlay 1-31
1-5 Traffic Circulation 1-32
1-6 Floodplain 1-33
1-7 Soils 1-34
1-8 Wetlands 1-35
1-9 Recreation 1-36
2-1 Year 2010 Traffic Circulation
2-2 Future Routing of Thru Traffic
2-3 Traffic Circulation Improvement
Program
4-1 Sewer Service Area
4-2 Water Distribution System
5-1 Econ River Basin
-5-
2-12
2-13
2-16
4-7
4-8
5-15
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LIST OF FIGURES
Population Projections
1. Historical Population Estimates. .
2. 1996 Population Projections. . . . .
3. 2010 Population Projections. . . . .
-6-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLES
TABLE # PAGE
2-1 Summary of Improvements Program 2-17
2-2 Summary of 1996 Traffic Conditions 2-20
2-3 Summary of 2010 Conditions 2-22
With Planned Improvements
4-1 5 Year Capital Improvement Plan - Drainage 4-6
K-1
5 Year Capital Improvements Program
8-9
-7-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF OVIEDO
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PURPOSE: This Comprehensive Plan has been developed in response to the
requirements of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land
Development Regulation Act (Chapter 163, Florida Statutes) and Administrative Rule
9J-5. The plan is consistent with the State, Regional and County plans and will serve
as the basis for all land development decisions within the City of Oviedo.
In addition to fulfilling legislative requirements, the City is adopting a Comprehensive
Plan in order to protect and maintain its natural resources, to preserve its community
character, and to direct growth and development to those areas best suited for
various land uses. The City recognizes individual property rights, but is pro-actively
planning so that the locations and intensities will benefit the City as a whole.
HISTORY: This document is the first major revision and update of the City's
Comprehensive Plan since City Council first adopted a plan in 1977. In 1977 the
population of the City of Oviedo was estimated to be almost 3,000, and the City
covered almost 4,000 acres. During the past 12 years, however, the City has grown
from a rural farm community to an urban center developing at a pace far beyond what
was anticipated. The 1977 Comprehensive Plan projected a 1990 population of
6,000. As of April 1 , 1990, the City's population exceeded 11,000 and the land area
totaled 8,635 acres. Although the City does not expect to maintain this growth rate
forever, it does recognize that change is inevitable. After a decade of responding to
development requests, the City is ready to take the responsibility of managing and
directing its own services and growth patterns.
SUMMARY: The Comprehensive Plan for the City of Oviedo is a dynamic
document, not a static blueprint for the future. All land development will be required
to be consistent with the Short Range Land Use Plan and all the other policies
adopted as part of the Comprehensive Plan.
The use of a short time frame for land use consistency allows the City to schedule
major development and direct the current market needs to the locations best suited
for those land uses. This management plan should help prevent leap frog
development and urban sprawl. The plan will also be evaluated and updated
annually to adjust for new information and varying growth rates.
-8-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The Comprehensive Plan projects a 1996 population of 23,396 and a 2010
population of 29,153. These estimates have been approved by DCA and are
consistent with Seminole County projections. Understanding that the City has 4,683
committed residential units, it becomes obvious that the City's growth management
strategies should concentrate on future services for those committed units,
commercial, office and industrial development, fringe areas, and future annexations.
Much of the residential growth and location has been predetermined.
I. Services:
a) Water: The plan addresses water resources in the Conservation Element
and water treatment and distribution in the water section of the Infrastructure
Element. The City recognizes that its water supply is fragile and that chloride levels
and other water quality items must be carefully addressed.
The City plans to construct several wells at shallower depths instead of one or two
deep wells in order to avoid salt water intrusion; to locate additional well fields to the
south and west, away from the salt water interface; to construct an elevated storage
tank for servicing the southeastern portion of the City; and to adopt stringent
conservation and well-field protection ordinances.
:,
User fees will be revised to cover operation and maintenance fees and provide
adequate reserves. Capital recovery fees will also be adopted to cover the costs of
growth-related system expansions and improvements.
b) Sewer: The City has taken a first step in providing central sewer service by
contracting with Seminole County for Iron Bridge capacity, but needs additional time
to develop a master plan that will provide collection, treatment, and disposal facilities
for future development.
The City recognizes the importance of controlling this public service and has included
policies that will allow sufficient time to develop a financially feasible plan without
allowing degradation of existing levels of service or proliferation of potential
environmental hazards.
c) Drainage: The City intends to begin correcting existing flooding and water
quality problems by taking over the functional maintenance of stormwater systems
and establishing a stormwater utility. Revenues from this utility would also fund a
detailed study of the Sweetwater Creek drainage basin so that remedial work can
begin in this area.
-9-
I
I
,I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
d) Traffic Circulation: The transportation plan evaluates the operation of the
City system in accordance with FOOT standards and guidelines. Through-traffic will
be directed to by-pass roads and the local street system will be improved with a
network of connecting streets that provide alternative routes for local trips.
Some routes have been designated back-logged and constrained because of
overriding community goals and objectives. With the exception of the by-pass routes,
existing streets will be confined to two lanes with turn lanes and landscape features
to accommodate traffic, but also maintain community character.
Provisions for bike lanes and pedestrian ways are also included. Impact fees will be
revised to provide the necessary funding for specified improvements.
II. Commercial. Office. & Industrial Development
The plan encourages commercial and office development in the geographical center
of the City. Some outlying areas that were once designated for commercial
development, but are currently vacant, have been assigned lower intensity uses in
the Short and Long Range Land Use Plans. Areas that may be appropriate for
commercial development in the future, but not the present, may have a commercial
designation on the Long Range Plan and a lower intensity use on the Short Range
Plan.
These two planning time frames help guard against premature and leap frog
development. The intent of the Comprehensive Plan is to permit commercial, office
and industrial development first in those areas best suited for the uses.
Neighborhood or small-scale office development will also be permitted in areas with
residential land use classifications as special exceptions. This provision will allow
necessary services in appropriate locations without transforming neighborhoods into
commercial centers.
III. Fringe Areas & Future Annexations:
Potential annexation areas are included on the Long-Range Land Use Plan.
Boundaries, land uses and policies for these areas will be addressed in a proposed
inter-local agreement between Oviedo and Seminole County. For the most part, the
-10-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
.1
I
City supports low intensity development in the fringe areas to the north and east.
Most of the area to the west and south is committed to development under other
jurisdictions, and is already considered to be urban in nature.
HIGHLIGHTS:
The Comprehensive Plan endorses the following:
-Water conservation and monitoring of the salt water interface.
-Acquisition and preservation of permanent green space.
-Protection of wetlands, floodplains and unique vegetation.
-Control of central service utilities such as water and sewer as a community service
and a tool for growth management.
-Coordination with neighboring governments and jurisdictional agencies through
information exchange and cooperation.
-Maintenance of community character.
-Relief of tax burden on the current residents with impact fees to cover future capital
improvements related to growth.
-Recreational opportunities and facilities for all citizens.
-Affordable housing for current and future residents, and elimination of substandard
housing units.
- Support of school impact fees and requirement of school impact analysis for
residential development.
(REVIEW)
- i ,
-11-
I
I
,I
I
RESOLUTION MO. 387-89
A RF.sOLlITIOH or TIlF: CITY or OVIWO Al'lOPTIIIG ^
ruOl.IC PARTIC/PATIOH PROGRhM FOR TIlF; ]99]
UPDATE or TilE COHrREI/EH51 VE PI.hH
I
WREREAS, Chapter 16.l.JIRI of Ihl' Plorlda statutes dIrects all
local governments to adopt pror.~durr.~ desIgned to provide effective
puhllc particIpation In the! comprl'he!nslve plannIng procesR and to
provide real property owners wIth nollce of all officIal actions which
regulate the URe of theIr property, and
I
WHEREAS, the CIty Is In thl' process oC UpdatJng Its
ComprehensIve Plan lo compJy with Chilplcr 9J-5 of the FlorIda
AdminIstrative Code,
NOW TIlEREI"ORE, be " re!~olved hy I.he City of OvJedo as
I
folloVR:
'1
Sec.!J..Qn II That. the follolllnq puhllc Part lc1patIon Program hI!
adopled for use during the revJew and approval of the 1991 update to lhe
Comprehensive Plan:
I
,I
.1
A. structure
During t.he develoJ'llllr.nt of the 1991 Comprehensive Plan update,
several commlt.tees and I~~rd~ will t.ake responsJbilJty for the
various aspects of publJc parllclpalJon.
1) Q.Y.A~!J..~ Clly ~o.!l.n~.u.l The CHy Coundl wlIl conduct work
se~Rlons and lIeveraJ rmbllc hr.arlng~ durJng the course of
th~ comprehensJve plannIng process. The Council wJll
consider generaJ publIc Input. technJcal recommendations,
recommendations of the Planning Re,lew Teams,
Jntergovernmental recomml'ndatlons and recommendations of
the I~cal PlannIng Agency br.fore making fInal decisions on
aJI elements of the Comprehr.nnJve Plan.
2) ~n..4 l1..!lmV!19 f\g~!!q; TI,,~ City I.and PlannIng Agency
DerVes as the f~Cill Plilnnlnq Agency, and as ouch 1ft
renponslble for prl'I'OIr Inl/ t.hr. -Comprehensive Plan,
conrfudlng Inll.hl f'llhllr hr.OIrlnqR, and maltlnq
rr.commendallonn for i1cfopl Ion to the City CoundJ. The
I.PA wJJI coordlnale cOlllllf!nt~ from the general public,
lhe Technical Rcvlr.1I CommJu.r.e, the PlannIng ReVIew
TealM, and the CHy Council.
J) flannJnq Review l.~E'!1DJ. The follolllng connJllec~ wI I J II(!
formed t.o meet pcrlodlc~lly throughout the developmenl
and revIew of the 1991 ComprehensJve Plan update:
J) Puture I.and \I~I! ~ncf lIousJng
2) Trafrlc Ctrculallon
J) Infrilstruclure ilnd ConservatJon
4) Recreation
5) Jntergovernment~1 CoordlnilUon
6) Capital Improvements
tilch leam vJ]) have desJgn~led LP^. CIty Coundl, and
stafr representatives. Interested citizens viII also be
encouraged lo join lhe teilm of theJr choice. No learn,
however, wtll have more lhiln five (~) participants in
order to maIntain a funcllonal operiltion.
I
I
'I
I
m
I
I
I,
-12-
I
E~h leam v III pf('pi!re forma I reconrnendations ror lhr. I,PA
and city Council.
I
.1
,I
4) ~l.@l Revi~,-: ~l?.!!'!ll.u!!~ The City stafr vn1 form a
Technkal Revlev COIl11lI tl.ep. 1.0 V.1lld.1te assumptions i!nd
~llstlnq facilitIes i!no conditions. Specifically. lhe
follovlng staff members will form the Technical Review
COIl'lllIl tr.e:
I
1. Clly Hani!qcr
2. Public Works Dlreclor
J. rln~nce Dir~lor
4. Planning Director
S. rlre chIef
6. Police Chief
7. Bulldinq orf ieli!l
8. Recreation Olrr.clor
I
Thr. Technical Revlr.w Commlllr.e vIII reviev all elemenls
i!nd milkr. reconrnr.nrl"llonl1 10 the I.P^ ilnd City Council.
I
B. format
1. 19~b.!!.Jcal. BllYJ~~ ~Q'!!!'Htee.1 Thl! PlilnnJng Department. will
chaIr the Technical R!!vlr.v Committee and coordInal.e dill. a
collection and eVilluatlon~ The r.orrrnlttee llIr.ets regularly
lwice a month and wIll addrc99 comprehensive planning
issues as lhey arJse.
2. ~rrqtng ~e,Jew Tea~9:' ^ stafr member, under the
direction of t.he Plann}ng I>r.rart.ment. vJ11 serve as
chaJr~an and secretary of each Planning RevIew Tea~.
The team memberR viII ilgrre on meetJng dates and times in
accordance with lhe progress of applicable elements and
ne<:esllary data.
The llleetJngs vIII be Informai dlscus!lions of the aSRJgncd
elements. Public corrrnents vill be evaluated, and minutes
viII be kept and filed.
J. ~QIk Sesslon[l The following dat.es have been established
for work sessions:
I;
I
J
I
I
I
September 25. 19R9
November JB, 1999
January 29, )999
Apr 11 J9, 1999
July JO, 1999
January 2., 1991
'I
I
I
(.
The work sessions wl)1 (ocus on varyIng topIcs and
elements and viiI he an opportunity to update the City
Councn, lhe I.rA. and lhe genera I public on the fllalus of
lhe Comprehensive Pliln. These sessions viII be
opportunities for information sharing and receipt of
public conrnents.
Y.ach work ses910n viII Iw taped and mlnules viII Or. lak!!n
and fIled. Questlonnalr!!s and forms for wrltlen comments
vIll be available al. each meeting.
Public Hearl~~ PublIc HearIngs viiI be held by both
the LPA and the City CouncIl prior to transmIttal and
adoptIon of any element of the ComprehensIve Plan. All
elements vIII be consIdered together.
I
I
-13-
I
I
I
,I
I
'1'
I
I
I,
,I
I
I
,I
I,
I
I
I
I
C.
These publ Ie lIearlng:'! vI I 1 be held In accordance wIth
F.S: chapter 163.
"otifIcation and ~dvert~~1n9
,
Two local nevspapers l'll'fVl! thr. dl.lzens of OvIedo. 1M
Q~ Is a weekly papl'r hcadqll.lrlered within the Clly
lImltll. and Ihe orla.!lJi.9 !?~~JJnel. Is .1 d;ll ly paper serving the
entIre orlando metropolJtan area. The OrlandQSentinel also
publJshes a local Inserl. I.n~ ~~mlno~ SenUne!. that focuses on
local Issues.
The Cll.y of ovIedo viII annollnce the starl of l.he
ComprehensIve plan updal.e ;lOd :'!ollcll public particlpation
wllh an article in The outl~o~ and The Seminole SentInel.
Informal notices of all grnr.ral vork sl!:'!:'!ions wIll b<! plaer.1I
In the "bulletin boanr llr.dlons of the seml!lili ~!lel anll
Ib~ ~tlQQ~. reriodlc work sr.snlons will be legaJly
advertJsed In ~ outloo~ al Jeasl seven 171 days prIor to lhe
sessJon.
SpeclflcaJly. Ihl! following work Rr.nnlonR wIll be advcrllnr.d:
II Novr.mhr.r JR, 19n?
21 January 29, 1999
JI July J9, 1999
41 January 24. 1991
The transmittal hearing before the I,Ph, scheduled for Harch 7.
1991 will be advertised In the Ir.gal section of ~ Ouliook on
February 28, and In The ~~.~2J~ Sentinel on February 21.
On Match 11, 1991, a one-quart.er page ad wll1 be placed in
Ib!1. ~l.!!ljl.9~ ~!!lJn.ti. advertIsIng the transmittal public
hearing before lhe CIty Council. ThIs ad will not be placed
in the legal lIection of the paper.
D.
General
The clly will advertise a clo:'!lng date of October I. 1989 for
the fIlIng of map amendmr.nts to the Land Use tlement of the
Comprehensive Plan. No map amendments wJl1 be procellRed after
lhat date in order to allov staff tIme to develop the
comprehensive Plan update. rroperly owners will be encouraged
to f1Je1nformal request:'! for evaluation of specific parcels
throughout the planning pror.p.:,!:,!. so th~t necessary changes In
classifIcations can be evaluated vIth the update adoption.
Copies of all supportlng document!! and draft elf'ments vlll be
avaIlable In the city lIall and at lhe oviedo branch of the
Senlnole County LIbrary Syslem. The Planning Department vlll
also issue ~nthly updates lo all committee ~embers and
interested citizens.
The Comprehensive rlan will Include procedures for publIc
participation In the amendment process and the review and
approval of EvaluatIon and AppraIsal Reports.
~ection 2: That all resolution:'! or parts thereof in conflIct.
with the provIsions herein contaJned are. 1.0 I.he extent of such conftlct,
hereby superceded and repealed.
section 3: That thIs ResoluUon shall become effectJve
Irrmedlalely.
I
I
-14-
I
I
rASSEI> AND Mx>rTf:O thl:1 .2.~_ tl'lY of
A.O., 1989.
September
I
I
The foregoing R~~olul:lon No. JR7 ,89 W<l~ p~~nr.d 'lnd adopted ~y
the City Council of the City of Oviedo, Florlrl'l, on the ~ day of
September , A.D., 1989.
n the CHy counei}
City of OvIedo, Florld<l
I
I
ATTr.ST:
I,
I,
-:JJau4~~
City Clerk (J
The foregoIng Resolution Is 'lpprovr.d hy mil thJs ~ day of
]eptember , A.D., 1989.
I
^n~~ L.f/
~t-Cd K. &~
Cit lerk
t ~ereby certIfy th'lt a true <lnd correct copy of the foregoing
Resolution Woo 387-89 was by me, on the 12th day of
~t:.amb..,. , A.D.. 1989 posted In three (3) pub1Jc places, wHhln
the CIty of Oviedo, Florida, to vIt:
,I
I
.1
I
. cIty lIal1
~hl DuJjQjng.-1.LS. Cel!1I.~
U. S. Post orrlC{!. {jeneva Drive
IN WITHESS WnF.REoF. I havp. herPllnlo 1IP.1: my hand and ofrlca}
Seal of saId CIty of ovIedo, rlorJd'l, thl~ -1~~h- day or Sep~emhex----,
A.O.. 1989.
I'
I
_~:f..a<L~~~ _
CIty CJerk the CIty of OvIedo,
Florldol
I
,I
I
I
-15-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
'I
,I
I
,I
I.
'I
If
I
I
I
I
IMPLEMENTATION
In accordance with Chapter 163.3194 of the Florida State Statutes, and following adoption
of this amendment to the Oviedo Comprehensive Plan, all development undertaken by ,
and all actions taken in regard to development orders by the City of Oviedo shall be
consistent with this Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Map Series. Any
document adopted by reference is that document as it exists on the date of plan adoption.
A) land Development Code
The City revised its Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Regulations into a unified Land
Development Code in 1989. This Code will be revised prior to April 1 , 1992, to include the
regulations, reviews, and permits required to fully implement the Comprehensive Plan and
to comply with s.163.3230 F.S. Any proposed land Development Code revisions
referenced in this document will be included in the 1992 update. Specific inclusions
are included as attachment A. The Land Development Code will also be amended to
include concurrency review and evaluation of all regulation and administrative permits.
The system will assure that no permit is issued that would result in a reduction of adopted
levels of service.
Concurrent with the revision of the Land Development Code, the City shall identify the
following:
1) All parcels with a zoning classification that conflicts with the Short Range Land Use
classification.
2) All parcels with non-conforming uses.
With proper notification and review, the City will then conduct public hearings to
administratively rezone affected parcels. The procedure will also include a "grandfather"
provision to permit existing land uses to continue operating under current conditions.
Substantial changes in use (as defined in the Land Development code) or abandonment
shall require conformance to the Land Development Code and Comprehensive Plan.
B) Comprehensive Plan Amendments
Any proposed amendment to the Short Range Land Use Plan shall require a full evaluation
similar to the Annual Review. The applicant must demonstrate compliance with the goals,
objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and assure that there will be no
reduction in adopted levels of service.
-16-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
I
I
,I,
I
I
I
I
C) Concurrency ManaQement System
The Concurrency Management System is a regulatory mechanism designed to ensure
that the level of service standards adopted in this plan are maintained. The major
components of the system are as follow:
1) Inventory: The Planning and Zoning Department shall maintain the following
inventories for use in assessing existence levels of service. and cumulative
impacts of proposed new development.
A. Traffic Circulation
1) design capacity of roadway types
2) average daily trips and peak hour trips on each roadway link as
measured by Seminole County
3) existing level of service for each roadway link as determined by measured
trips and designated capacity
4) adopted level of service standards for roadways
5) existing capacities or deficiencies of the network
6) projected capacities or deficiencies resulting from committed yet unbuilt
development in both the City and the County
7) scheduled, funded improvements by year of completion for City, County
and FOOT facilities and the impact on capacity
B. Sanitary Sewer (for each central sewer service area)
1) design capacity of the wastewater treatment facilities
2) existing levels of service measured by the average number of gallons per
day per unit based on the average treatment plant flows and the total
equivalent residential connections in the service areas
3) the adopted level of service standard
4) existing deficiencies or capacities
5) projected capacities or deficiencies
-17-
I
I
.1
,I
I
I
I
I
,-
,I
I
-I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
6) scheduled, funded improvements by year of completion and the impact on
existing capacity
C. Potable Water
1) design capacity of the water treatment facilities
2) existing levels of service measured by the average number of
gallons/day/unit based on the average flows and the total equivalent
residential connections in the service area
3) existing storage capabilities
4) existing minimum water pressure
5) the adopted level of service standards
6) the existing capacities or deficiencies of the system
7) projected capacities or deficiencies resulting from committed yet unbuilt
development
8) scheduled, funded improvements by year of completion and the impact
on existing capacity
D. Solid Waste
1) the design capacity of the County disposal facility and transfer station
2) the existing level of service as provided by Seminole County in pounds
per capita
3) the adopted level of service
4) the existing capacities or deficiencies of the facility
5) projected capacities or deficiencies resulting from committed yet unbuilt
development
6) scheduled, funded improvements by year of completion and the impact
on existing capacity
- J,R-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
E. Stormwater (Drainaoe)
1) the existing level of service measured by storm event as determined by
the City and its consulting engineers
2) the adopted level of service standard
F. Recreation and Open Space
1) the existing acreage of park land and existing facilities
2) the existing level of service measured by the number of acres of park
land per 1,000 residents; the number of tennis courts, basketball courts,
racquetball courts, baseball/softball fields, and football/soccer fields per
1,000 residents; and the percentage of open space in developed
acreage
3) the adopted level of service standard
4) the existing capacities or deficiencies of the recreation and open space
systems
5) the projected capacities or deficiencies resulting from committee yet
unbuilt development
6) scheduled, funded improvements by year of completion and the impact
on existing capacity
2. Assessment
Under the City's current unified Land Development Code, all permitted uses
require a Conditional Use Permit. This permit corresponds to preliminary
subdivision approval and site plan approval. The permit expires within one year
if the applicant has not proceeded with the development process. The
assessment portion of the Concurrency Management System will be
incorporated into the review process of all CUP applications.
The Planning and Zoning Department will be responsible for performing a
concurrency assessment on all CUP applications to ensure that public facilities
are available concurrent with the impacts of the proposed development. The
Inventory shall be the basis for establishing existing conditions and the
Assessment shall proceed in accordance with the following:
-19-
I
I
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
1) No development that impacts a facility which is currently deficient may be
approved unless one of the following conditions is met:
- the required improvement is scheduled in the current fiscal year and will be
completed prior to the projected impacts
- the CUP includes the required improvement as a condition of approval
- the facility has been designated as "constrained" and the projected impact
does not exceed the permitted percentage of use increase specified in the plan
element
2) The impacts of new development shall be assessed against the existing
conditions of the Inventory and the projected impacts from unbuilt development
with a valid CUP.
3) Concurrency may be assessed in phases if a specific phasing plan is
included with the CUP approval and each phase can meet the established
concurrency requirements.
4) The Planning and Zoning Department may require additional information from
applicants in order to accurately assess the impact of the proposed
development. Failure to provide adequate and accurate information may be a
basis for denial of the permit.
5) Traffic: The Land Development Code shall establish development
thresholds at which traffic studies will be required. Traffic impacts shall be
determined using the Institute of Traffic Engineering (ITE) Manual trip
generation rates.
6) The Land Development Code shall include standard sewer, water and solid
waste generation rates which shall be used for assessment purposes. Specific
studies signed and sealed by a registered professional may be accepted
by the City in determining the specific impacts of a.proposed development.
7) The Land Development Code includes recreation standards and
requirements for residential uses. Commercial, office and industrial uses shall
not be assessed for impacting recreational facilities, although the open
space standard shall apply to all development. Planned Unit Developments
shall be assessed for recreational impact in accordance with the proposed land
uses.
-20-
I
I
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3. Implementation
The Planning and Zoning Department shall coordinate with applicable City
departments and private utilities to provide a recommendation to the Land
Planning Agency and the City Council on all CUP applications. These
recommendations shall include, but not be limited to the following:
A) The ability of existing facilities to accommodate the proposed development at
the adopted level of service standards.
B) Any existing deficiencies that must be corrected.
C) Any improvements required to accommodate the proposed
development.
D) A recommendation of approval or denial with any applicable conditions.
If a CUP is issued for the project, the following information shall be included on
the permit:
- specified impacts to be created
- specific facility improvements required to ensure the finding of concurrency and
the entity responsible for the design and installation
The provisions of the CUP are reviewed for compliance at the time of building
permit submittal and again prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Any
improvement that need not be completed prior to issuance of a building permit
will be so described on the CUP. All conditions of approval on the CUP shall
be met prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
Projects which have a valid CUP as of April 1, 1992 shall be exempt from the
concurrency requirement. This exemption shall also apply to projects with a
valid DRI development order and all vacant lots in residential subdivisions
which were platted and recorded prior to April 1, 1992.
The Planning and Zoning Department shall prepare an annual report to describe
and analyze the Inventory information maintained by the Department. This
information will be available to the public and will serve as the basis for
preparing and updating the 5 year Capital Improvements Plan, for reviewing and
revising the Comprehensive Plan, and for preparing the City's annual budget.
The first report will be available April 1, 1992 and updated April 1 every year
thereafter.
-2,1-
,I
I
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ATTACHMENT A
LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 1992
- Revision of Zoning Map
- Neighborhood Commercial as a special exception in residential districts.
- Addition of design criteria to protect natural features and maintain compatibility with
adjacent land uses.
- Requirement for needs assessment prior to development review.
- Including lighting, landscaping and planting as part of required public improvements.
- Designation and acquisition of ROW.
- Requirement of vehicular, pedestrian and bikeway connections.
- Town center street standards for aesthetics.
- Standards for aesthetic enhancement and accommodations for non-motorized traffic.
- Typical cross-sections for various roadway-types.
- Implementation and inspection procedures for street enhancement.
- Maximum size limitations for streets and roadways.
Requirement for housing relocation plans.
- Septic tank regulations.
- Package plant regulations.
- Dedication requirements for sewer facilities.
- Requirements for dry line construction.
- Reduction of C & D debris at landfills.
- Protection of natural drainage features.
-"2:2-
"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- Open space requirements.
- Stormwater management criteria for aquifer recharge areas.
- Requirements for xeriscaping and use of native plants.
- Well-field protection.
- Econlockhatchee River Basin Protection.
- Specific Erosion control measures and reclamation requirements.
- Requirement for flora and fauna survey and wetlands evaluation.
- Criteria for designating and protecting environmentally sensitive areas.
- Multi-jurisdictional impact analysis.
SPECIAL ORDINANCES & PROJECTS
- Land Use and development standards for S.R. 426 district(1992).
- Plan for Downtown Development District (1992).
- Revision of impact fees for transportation, recreation, fire, police, water, and sewer
( 1992).
- Inter-local Agreement with Seminole County (1993).
- Plan for improvement and expansion of the local street system.
- Canopy tree and parkway corridors (1993).
- Sidewalk and bikeway plan.
- Plan for extending infrastructure to substandard areas.
- Plan for water reuse and/or reclamation of effluent discharge (1992).
- Industrial Pre-treatment Ordinance (1993).
- Recycling policies and separation or yard waste (1992).
-13-
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- Litter control program (1992).
- Stormwater Utility Ordinance (1992).
- Procedures for street sweeping ditch cleaning and functional Maintenance of
stormwater systems (1992).
- Water quality monitoring program (1993).
- Water Conservation Ordinance (1992).
- Revision of water rates (1992).
- Well-field Protection Ordinance (1992).
- Back-flow Prevention Ordinance (1992).
- Maintenance and leak detection program (1992).
- Resolution supporting CARL Program (1992).
- Intergovernmental Coordination Committee (1992).
- Standards for ranking Capital Improvement proposals.
(ATTACH. A)
>24-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
9i-5.016(5) Monitorina and Evaluation
As discussed in various elements of this Comprehensive Plan, the City will conduct an
annual review of the data, assumptions, and levels of service used to develop the
goals, objectives, and policies of the Plan. The review will include, but not be limited to
the following:
1) A comparison of the existing and projected population.
2) An analysis of the existing capacity and levels or service for:
a) transportation (existing traffic counts and projected levels of service for
the ext 5 year period)
b) water, sewer, drainage, and solid waste
c) recreation
3) A comparison of collected and projected revenues.
4) An analysis of the past year's building activity.
5) Identification of programs, studies, and regulations adopted to implement the
Plan.
6) Update of the 5 Year Capital Improvements Plan.
7) Synopsis of changing conditions and/or unanticipated events.
8) Analysis of the concurrency management system.
If the existing conditions are not consistent with those anticipated by the Short Range
Land Use Plan, then the review will also include recommended amendments to the
Future Land Use Map Series, the Capital Improvements Plan, and/or the goals,
objectives, policies and LOS standards of the Comprehensive Plan.
These amendments shall ensure that development consistent with the Short Range
Land Use Plan can be accomplished without degradation of the adopted level of
service standards.
-'25-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MonitorinQ
In order to validate the concurrency management system and ensure the best available
data for the annual review, the City shall monitor the following on a monthly basis:
1) Number of residential building permits issued.
2) Total number of housing units.
3) Total population.
4) Existing land use acreage.
5) Committed development.
6) Total number of water connections.
7) Total number of sewer connections per utility.
8) Available service capacities.
9) Total collected impact fees and capital recovery fees.
10) Paved road mileage.
11) Status of construction projects.
All development and permit requests will be reviewed for consistency. Approvals will
not be granted if the request is not consistent with the Short Range Land Use Plan or
any other portion of the adopted Comprehensive Plan.
Evaluation and Appraisal
In accordance with Chapter 163.3191 of the Florida Statutes, the City shall at least
once every five years prepare an Evaluation and Appraisal report which includes, but is
not limited to the fOllowing:
1) An assessment and evaluation of the success or failure
of the Comprehensive Plan.
2) Identification of the major problems of development,
physical deterioration, and economic impact.
-26-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3) The condition of each element at the time of adoption
and date of the report.
4) A comparison of plan objectives and actual results.
5) An assessment of the extent to which unanticipated and
unforeseen problems and opportunities occurred between
the date of adoption and date of report.
6) An evaluation and update of the Long Range Land Use
Plan.
7) Analysis of existing capacity and adopted levels of
service.
8) Suggested amendments.
The city will solicit citizen input for development and review of the Evaluation and
Appraisal Report, and Council will formally adopt the report following recommendation
of the Land Planning Agency.
':':'17-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
POPULATION PROJECTIONS
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this study is to provide population projections which will serve as a basis
for determining the future land use, housing, and service needs for the City of Oviedo.
HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE:
The City of Oviedo is following the pattern of many cities in Central Florida as its
population enters into a period of rapid growth. The City's growth rate was stable between
1975 and 1985, but began to increase sharply by 1986. The population grew at an
average rate of 3.3% per year from 1975 to 1985, increasing. from 2,726 to 3,729. By
1989, however, the City's population had soared to 8,844. The average growth rate
increased to 24% per year and the total population more than doubled.
Seminole County has been a rapidly growing area for almost twenty years, but the center
of that growth has shifted from Altamonte Springs to Longwood to Lake Mary and now to
Oviedo as the various communities began to saturate available residential property. Most
of the urban vacant land in Seminole County now lies within the City of Oviedo. A
favorable Central Florida economy, Oviedo's proximity to the University of Central
Florida and other major employers, and improved access to the Orlando metropolitan area
have all attributed to this rapid growth. Given Seminole County's projected growth over
the next twenty years (71.1 %) and the various factors previously listed, it is expected that
the sharp increase in Oviedo's population will continue through the year 2010 and then
begin to level off as the vacant land is absorbed.
METHODOLOGY:
Because population projections for the City of Oviedo are not available from approved
sources for the years required by Chapter 9J-5, FAC, the City has chosen to prepare its
own population projections. Two mathematical extrapolation techniques (the method
of least squares and exponential trend curve) were used to generate projections for the
years 1995 and 2010. These techniques were chosen because they are simple to employ,
relatively inexpensive and acquire little data.
.,28-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The method of least squares and the exponential trend curve are forecasting techniques
which utilize the values of the variable being predicted for past periods of time. Such
values or data are called time series. Time series are best described in terms of a
graph like the one shown in Figure 1, in which the population of the City of Oviedo is
plotted against time for the period 1975-1989. The graph shows that Oviedo's population
has grown over the years, but that the growth has varied, being stable in some years
(1975-1984) and increasingly rapidly in others (1985-1989).
Probably the most important step in time series analysis is to find a suitable function to use
in generating forecasts. An appropriate function can be obtained by choosing the
function which best represents or "fits" the general pattern of the time series data points.
While the general pattern of Oviedo's growth (Figure 1) resembles a J shaped or
exponential curve, the trend over the last four years has been virtually linear. To account
for both possible future growth trends, i.e. linear and geometric, two functions or
techniques were chosen to produce the City's population projections. The method of least
squares was chosen to fit the linear trend exhibited in Figure 1 from 1985 to 1989; the
exponential trend curve was chosen to fit the overall pattern of the data graph.
As discussed previously, both of these techniques generate projections by mathematically
manipulating data or times series of a given population. The actual times series used in
computing the City's projections are Oviedo population estimates for 1983-1989. These
years were chosen, versus the full times series shown in Figure 1, because 1983 was the
year that Oviedo's population began to grow markedly. This time series best reflects the
City's recent growth trend and does not include historical estimates which would
weigh down the predictive value of both functions.
POPULATION PROJECTIONS:
1995 Projection:
The projections which were generated for 1995 using the linear trend and exponential
trend curve are 14,322 and 26,220, respectively. The City chose to moderate the range
difference between the two figures by averaging. The resultant 1995 projection is 20,271.
Figure 2 shows the results of the linear trend and exponential trend curve techniques, as
well as the results of averaging.
2010 Projection:
The projections which were generated for 2010 using the linear trend and exponential
trend curve are 29,153 and 407,000, respectively. The 2010 projection is simply the
-29-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
figure (29,153) provided by the linear trend. The result produced by the exponential trend
curve (407,000) is obviously unrealistic and was discarded. Figure 3 shows the results
of the linear trend projection. A computer worksheet for both the 1995 and 2010
projections is provided in the appendix to this study.
Seasonal Population Projection:
Data on seasonal population are not available for the City of Oviedo from either the
Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) in Gainesville or The Center for
Population Studies (TCFPS) in Tallahassee. The City also has no records or evidence of
any migratory housing units existing within the City of Oviedo.
To project the City's seasonal population the current number of vailable hotel units was
multiplied by a persons-per-room value. According to a publication of the East Central
Florida Regional Planning Council Hotel/Motel Inventory 1989, p. 7) there are 26 hotel
units in the City of Oviedo. The only municipal persons-per-room data available in the
Central Florida area is for the City of Orlando. Statistical data compiled by Pannell Kerr
Forster gives an average persons-per-room figure of 1.8 over the period 1976-1986. The
City used a persons-per-room value of two in making its projections.
While similar data on occupancy rates are available, the City assumed an occupancy rate
of 100%. This assumption simplifies the analysis and is in keeping with the goal of
assuring that adequate services are available when demand is maximized. Therefore, if
all of the hotel units were occupied at one time there would be approximately (26 x 2) 52
visitors in the City.
Final Projections:
Adjusting the projections provided earlier to account for the projected seasonal population
yields the final 1995 and 2010 population projections given in Table 1:
~30-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FIGURE 1
Historical Population Estimates
8QCX) ............. ........ ........... ........ ........................... ................................ ...... ............ ............... .......... ..... ..... .....
7roJ .... ....... ............. ......... ............................... ... .... .............. -....... ................ -......... ............. ............ . ................. ......
6QO() .................... ..... .... ........ ....................... .......................... .............. ....... ........... ........ .....................
':3f:XX) .......... ................. .................. ............... ............. .............. ........ .......... ......... .......... ...,. .....................
4(X)J ............. ... ............ .............. ............... ......... ........ ......... ......... .............. ........................ .....................
3CX)() ........... ............... ................................. .............. - -.. .......... ..... ............ ................... ............ ....................
2roJ .... ....... ........... ..................... ........ ....................... ........... ..... ............ ..... ......... ... ...... ......... ....... ...... .......
1 OCX) ....... ..... ......... ....... ..:............. .............................. ........ ............ .......... ...... ....... ... ...... .................
o
1975 19T! 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989
1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988
Yecrs
YEAR POPULATION
1975 2,726
1976 2,644
1977 2,690
1978 2,758
1979 2,796
1980 3,074
1981 3,151
1982 3,201
1983 3,249
1984 3,419
1985 3,729
1986 4,839
1987 6,295
1988 7,586
1989 8,844
SOURCE: Florida Statistical Abstract, Bureau of Economic and
Business Research, The University Presses of Florida,
1976-1990,
-31-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX
Years
Beyond
Base
Year
Oviedo
Population
YEAR
X
Y
LOG y X~LOG Y
X*X
--------------------------
---------
1983 0 3249 3.5117 o .0000 0
19B4 1 3419 3.5339 3.5339 1
1985 2 3729 3.5716 7 . l432 4
1986 3 4839 3.6848 11.0543 9
1987 '" 6295 3.7990 15 . 1 960 16
1988 5 7586 3.8800 19.4001 25
1989 6 8844 3 .9466 23.6799 36
---
21 25.9277 80.0073 91
n=7 x=3
L I NEAR TREND
Regression Output:
Constant
X Coefficient
2456 .75
988.75
1995 = 2456.75 + 988.75(12) = 14322
2010 = 2456.75 + 988.75(27) = 29153
EXPONENTIAL TREND
log b = .079"
log a = 3.4658
1995 = 3.4658 + .0794( 12) = 4.4186
~.
= antilog (4.4186)
= 26220
2010 = 3.4658 -+ .9794(27) = 5.6096
= antilog (5.6096)
= 407000 -32-
.1
I'
I'
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 1
1996 AND 2010 POPULATION PROJECTIONS
CITY OF OVIEDO
Population Seasonal Total
Projection Projection Projection
---------- ----------- ----------
1996 23,396 52 23,448
2010 29,153 52 29,205
-33-
I
I
I
I
I
I
11
o
V)
Il
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FIGURE 2
1995 Population Projections
.30
25 .............................-.......................... ...... ....... ....... ............................................ ............................
20 .......................................-............ ...........................-.................................... ...... ......."............
15 ........ ......... ..-................................................................................-...... '" .........-........................
1 0 ................................................ ........................................................
5 ....-.............. .............................................................. ................._...............................................
o
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
Yecrs
YEAR POPULATION
1975 2,726
1980 3,074
1985 3,729
1995 20,271
1996 23,396
SOURCE: Florida Statistical Abstract, Bureau of Economic and
Business Research, The University Presses of Florida,
1976, 1981, and 1986.
-34-
)K
Gecmetrc
.
A~
.
Lnecr
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FIGURE 3
2010 Population Projection
30
25 ...................................................-.........:........................:................................... ............................
20 ................... .....................................-.........-.......-.................. ... .......... .......................................
.........
(J)
-0
C
o
(J)
a
F
'-"
15 ...................-........................................---.................. .................................. ............................
1 0 -......................-........................................ ..................................... ....... .................................... .........
5 ........-......................................... ......................... .................................................................
o
1975
1985
1995
2005
1980
1990
Yeas
200J
2010
YEAR
POPULATION
1975
1980
1985
2010
2,726
3,074
3,729
29,153
SOURCE: Florida Statistical Abstract, Bureau of Economic
and Business Research, The University Presses of
Florida, 1976, 1981, and 1986.
-35-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/(-;~W{ilr. ..;!,!.:;j;.,."",
. . .~'
/':...,:.:'. .' .'=t':.,
;.'<1 ." . ~ - . '.
:-... . ....:.
i~~!;~~il:~4~~\
..~...........,.~... .,;r.,
~:f., ':,,;T . '. . . ...:
\~~J.~"r:f.'. ~. . :.~/
....~I ~~,;{(!Ild ""'-....
.....~.~l~..~~.~.~ ,"
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
2740 CENTERVIEW DRIVE' TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399
BOB MARTINEZ
C~
THOMAS G. PelHAM
S"c,,,lary
October 31, 1990
Mr. Eric K. wills
City of Oviedo
400 Alexandria Boulevard
Oviedo, Florida 32765
Dear Mr. Wills:
Thank you for your letter of October 22 to John Barker,
which forwarded the latest population projections for the City of
Oviedo. We have reviewed this document, per your request, and
find that it meets the professional acceptability standards of
Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code. The methodologies
used for estimation and projection of resident and seasonal
populations, and the explanations of the statistical methods
employed, are consistent with the requirements of Section
9J-5.005(2) .
It was evident from the analysis that Oviedo has experienced
an explosive growth rate in recent years, but we believe that the
projected population figures are reasonable for your planning
purposes. We would recommend frequent re-eva1uation of the data,
of course, since your high-growth environment will have a signi-
ficant impact on services and facilities and will require the
best possible forecasting of demographic trends. The 1990 pro-
jection of 11,247, for example, should be cross-checked with the
U.S. Census count as soon as it becomes available to verify the
significant increase you show over the 1989 B.E.B.R estimate.
-36-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Mr. Eric K. Wills
October 31, 1990
Page Two
Thank you again for forwarding this a~alysis for our review.
If you have any questions regarding these comments, or if you
require further assistance, please contact Mr. Barker at
(904)922-5438.
RP/jbe
-37-
Sincerely,
N~
Robert Pennock, Chief
Bureau of Local Planning
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
II
I
II
LAND USE
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
.1
J
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
LAND USE
GOALS. OBJECTIVES. AND POLICIES
INTRODUCTION: The Future Land Use Map Series includes a Short Range (1996) Future
Land Use Map, a Long Range (2010) Future Land Use Map, and an Environmental
Evaluation Zone Overlay, a park facility and service area map, a soils map, and a wetlands
map illustrating rivers and lakes.
The Short Range Future Land Use Map has been analyzed in conjunction with established.
levels of service and scheduled capital improvements (CIP) to ensure that necessary public
facilities and services will be available concurrent with development impacts. The Long
Range Future Land Use Map outlines the 20 year development plan for the City, but
current development must comply with the Short Range Future Land Use Map. If
development and improvements proceed at a faster or slower rate than anticipated, the
maps and CIP will be adjusted accordingly.
Land use designations on the Long Range Map will not be shifted to the Short Range Map
without accompanying adjustments to the CIP.
The map of Environmentally Sensitive areas included in the Future Land Use Map Series
identifies wetland and floodplain areas in the City. This map will serve as an "overlay"
zone to identify areas in the City where there is a potential to harm natural resources.
Prior to approval of any rezoning or development request in these areas, the applicant
must fully evaluate the environmental conditions, determine the actual wetland and
floodplain boundaries, and provide for the preservation of viable, functional wetlands,
protection of rare habitat areas and maintenance of flood storage capacity without
destruction of native vegetation.
1-1. GOAL: TO DEVELOP AND MAINTAIN A WELL-BALANCED COMMUNITY WITH
A VARIETY OF LAND USES THAT ARE COMPATIBLE WITH EACH OTHER AND WITH
THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT.
1-1.1 OBJECTIVE: To coordinate future land uses with appropriate topography soil
conditions and availability of facilities and services by ensuring that all development
conforms to the Short Range Land Use Map and other applicable elements of the
Comprehensive Plan; that development plans appropriately maintain the natural features
1 - 1
I
I
I
I
I
I)
I
I
I
I
,I
I.
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
of the site; that they recognize the limitations of certain natural conditions; and that
adequate public facilities and services are available concurrent with the projected impact.
Measure: The City shall review and monitor all development requests for conformance to
the Comprehensive Plan. By 1992 the Official Zoning Map and the Short Range Future
Land Use Map shall be consistent.
Policies:
1-1.1.1
Amended 7-19-93 The Short Range Future Land Use Map Series shall
include the following land use classifications:
a.
Rural (<1 du/ac)
A category for large lot single family residential, agriculture, agriculturally related
industries, recreation and areas that are not yet ready for development because of
inadequate water, sewer, or transportation facilities. Acceptable agricultural
practices within this designation shall be restricted to citrus groves, pasture land,
forestry, and vegetable and feed crops. No commercial feed lots, confined or
exterior, shall be permitted within the City of Oviedo.
b. Low Density Residential (1-3.5 du/ac)
Conventional Development. A category for single family residential development
with a conforming gross residential density not less than one (1) dwelling unit per
acre and not more than 3.5 dwelling units per acre.
Other acceptable (secondary) land use activities allowed in this designation shall
include institution, recreation, conservation, and public. Agriculture is not an
acceptable land use. Secondary activities shall be approved on a conditional basis
as set forth in the Land Development Code, shall function to serve the primary use,
limited to intensities and densities compatible to LOR residential designations,
adequately buffered from adjacent residential areas, and subject to location criteria
that requires direct access to/collector or arterial roads if traffic impacts warrant such
facilities.
Planned Unit Development. Mixed use development in a LOR district shall be
approved as a Planned Unit Development consisting of single family residential as
the primary use and any combination of multi-family residential, neighborhood
commercial, office, conservation, public, institution or recreation uses. Where
commercial, office, multiple family residential, recreation or public land uses are
1 - 2
I
I'
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
.1
,I,
I
.1
I
I
I
I.
I
I
proposed in a LOR PUD, single family residential shall comprise at least sixty-five
percent of the collective total area allocated to these selective land uses.
The minimum land allocation for recreation and conservation for any PUD in a LOR
designation shall be no less than that required by adopted level of service standards
or other policy requirements of the Recreation, Conservation or Public Facilities
Elements.
The minimum and maximum density or intensity of use for each land use type
comprising the PUD shall be limited as follows:
Minimum
I nt/Den
Maximum
I nt/Den
Residential
Single Family
Multi-Family
3.5 du/ac
3.5 du/ac
gross density of residential
area
1 du/ac
1 du/ac
Commercial
Office
.4 FAR
.25 FAR
Public
.4 FAR
Open Space
30% of site area
Density Bonus. Planned unit developments proposed in Low Density Residential
Designations are allowed a residential density bonus up to ten percent above the
maximum density of 3.5 du/ac (i.e., maximum density of 3.85) for utilizing innovative
design to preserve open space and conservation areas or to promote internal traffic
attainment.
Location Criteria. A minimum of five acres is required for a PUD overlay, unless
otherwise approved by the Administrator. Planned unit development is also subject
to location criteria stipulated in Policy 3.7 of this element.
c. Medium Density Residential (3.6 - 8.0 du/ac)
Any new development in areas with this designation will require central sewer and
water service. Interim service may be permitted only in accordance with the goals,
objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
1 - 3
I
I
I
I
I
,I,
I
I
I
.11
I
I
,I
I
I
,I
I
I
I
Conventional Development. A category for higher density single family homes,
duplexes, cluster homes, patio homes, or a mix of such residential types with a
conforming gross residential density not less than 3.6 dwelling units per acre and
not more than eight (8.0) dwelling units per acre.
Other acceptable land use activities (secondary) allowed in this designation shall
include institution, recreation, conservation, and public. Such activities shall be
approved on a conditional basis as set forth in the Land Development Code,
functions to serve the primary use, limited to intensities and densities compatible to
MDR residential designations, adequately buffered from adjacent residential areas,
and subject to location criteria that requires direct access to collector or arterial
roads or intersections of local roads if traffic impacts warrant such facilities and
placement.
Planned Unit Development. Mixed use development in a MDR district sha'lI be
approved as a Planned Unit Development consisting of single family residential or
multi-family residential as the primary use and any combination of residential,
neighborhood commercial, office, conservation, recreation, or public land use
activities. Where commercial, office, recreation or public land uses are proposed
in a PUD, single family residential shall comprise at least fifty-five percent of the
development site.
The minimum land allocation for recreation and conservation for any PUD in a MDR
designation shall be no less than that required by adopted level of service standards
or other policy requirements of the Recreation, Conservation or Public Facilities
Elements.
The minimum and maximum density or intensity of use for each land use type
comprising the PUD shall be limited as follows:
Minimum
I nt/Den
Maximum
Int/Den
Residential
SF or MF
3.6 du/ac
8.0 du/ac gross density of
residential area
Commercial
Office
.45 FAR
.28 FAR
Public
Open Space
.45 FAR
30% of site area
1 - 4
I
I
I,
,I
J
,II
I
I
I
,I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
I
.1
I
Density Bonus. Planned unit developments proposed in Medium Density
Residential Designations are subject to a residential density bonus up to 7.5 percent
above the maximum density of 8.0 du/ac (up to 8.6 du/ac) and an intensity bonus
of one/fifth percentage point (.02) above the maximum acceptable floor area ratio
for commercial and office uses for utilizing innovative design to preserve open
space and conservation areas or to promote internal traffic attainment or pedestrian
and mass transit modes of transportation.
Location Criteria. A minimum of five acres is required for a PUD, unless otherwise
approved by the Administrator. Planned unit development is also subject to location
criteria stipulated in Policy 3.7 of this element.
d. High Density Residential (8.1 - 15 du/ac)
All new development in areas with this classification will require central sewer and
water service. Interim service may be permitted only in accordance with the goals,
objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. HDR designations must be
located along collector or arterial roads.
Conventional Development. A category for multi-family residential
development with a conforming gross residential density not less than 8.1 dwelling
units per acre and not more than fifteen (15) dwelling units per acre.
Other acceptable land use activities (secondary) allowed in this designation shall
include commercial or professional office, institution, recreation, conservation, and
public. Neighborhood commercial and professional office shall be limited to less
than twenty percent of the development site acreage and shall include adequate
buffer areas for adjacent residential areas and adhere location criteria requiring
direct access to a collector or arterial road.
Planned Unit Development. Mixed use development in an HDR district shall be
approved as a PUD consisting of a combination of multi-family residential as the
primary use and the following uses: commercial, office, conservation, recreation or
public. Where commercial or office land uses are proposed in a HDR PUD, multiple
family residential shall comprise at least fifty percent of the collective total area
allocated to the development site.
1 - 5
I
I
I
I,
I
,I)
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
.1
f
I
I
I
The minimum land allocation for recreation and conservation for any PUD in a HDR
designation shall be no less than that required by adopted level of service standards
or other policy requirements of the Recreation, Conservation or Public Facilities
Elements.
Minimum
Int/Den
Maximum
Int/Den
Residential
SF or MF
8.1 du/ac
15.0 du/ac
Commercial
Office
Public
.49 FAR
.29 FAR
.49 FAR
Open Space 30% of site area
Density Bonus. Planned unit developments proposed in High Density Residential
Designations are eligible to receive a residential density bonus up to five percent
above the maximum density of 15.0 du/ac (up to 15.75 du/ac) and an intensity
bonus of two/tenth percentage points (.02) above the maximum acceptable floor
area ratio for commercial and office uses (.51 and .32 FAR, respectively) when
utilizing innovative design to preserve open space and conservation areas or to
promote internal traffic attainment or pedestrian and mass transit modes of
transportation.
Location Criteria. A minimum of five acres is required for a PUD, unless otherwise
approved by the Administrator. Planned unit development is also subject to location
criteria stipulated in Policy 3.7 of this element.
e. Office
All new development in areas with this classification will require central sewer and
water service. Interim service may be permitted only in accordance with the goals,
objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
1 - 6
I
I
I
,I
I
Ii
I
I
I:
I
,I
I
,I
I
,I
I
I
I
I
A category accommodating professional office and low intensity commercial with
a floor area ratio less than .3. Single family residential uses up to 3.5 units per acre
are allowed in existing residential areas located adjacent to the Downtown Mixed
Use (PUD) District experiencing transitions from residential to commercial
development.
Other land use activities allowed within this designation shall include public,
institution, conservation, and recreation. Such activities are acceptable if the
following criteria are met: (1) activity is compatible to the primary use, (2) furthers
the low intensity office/commercial character supported in this designation, (3)
generates traffic consistent with or less than that characteristic of office activities,
and (4) floor area is consistent with the office designation.
Office/residential mixed use structures are allowed in Office Designations located
adjacent to the Downtown Mixed-use District.
f. Commercial
All new development in areas with this classification will require central sewer and
water service. Interim service may be permitted only in accordance with the goals,
objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Development occurring in
Commercial designations must have access to collector roads or arterial roads, or
to service roads that maintain direct access thereto.
Conventional Development. A category for retail/wholesale commercial and
office development with a floor area ratio up to .5 FAR. Other acceptable land use
activities (secondary uses) allowed in this designation shall include public, and
institution. Such activities shall be approved on a conditional basis as set forth in
the Land Development Code and shall be evaluated according to the intent to
maintain the commercial character supported in this designation. The location,
area, number, and character of secondary uses shall not change the predominant
commercial and office character of this land use designation. Intensities and
densities of these secondary acceptable uses are limited to those allowed for
commercial.
Planned Unit Development. Mixed uses within a commercial designation shall be
approved as a planned unit with commercial, office or a combination thereof serving
as primary uses together with any combination of residential, recreation,
1 - 7
,I
I
I
,I
J
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I,
,I
I
,I
I
I
I
I
conservation, light industrial, public or institutional. The primary land uses shall
occupy at least fifty percent of the developable land area.
The following criteria apply to commercial PUDs:
1. Single and multiple family residential development must not exceed a density
of fifteen units per acre;
2. Intensity of all other land uses are limited to the maximum intensity allowed
for commercial uses in this designation;
3. Light industrial land uses acceptable in a commercial mixed use PUD shall
only include enclosed manufacturing uses that require no outdoor storage.
4. Open space shall comprise no less than thirty percent (30%) of total site
area.
Density Bonus. Planned unit developments proposed in Commercial Designations
are eligible to a density bonus up to one/tenth percentage points (.1) above the
maximum acceptable floor area ratio for commercial and office uses (.6 FAR) for
utilizing innovative design to preserve open space and conservation areas, or to
promote internal traffic attainment or pedestrian and mass transit modes of
transportation.
Location Criteria. A minimum of fifteen acres is required for a PUD. Planned unit
development is also subject to location criteria stipulated in Policy 3.7 of this
element.
g. Industrial (CPA 95-01; Ord. No. 936; Amended 5/15/95)
.
Any new development in areas with this designation will require central sewer and
water service. Interim service may be permitted only in accordance with the goals,
objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Development occurring in
Commcrciallndustrial designations must have access to collector roads or arterial
roads, or to service roads that maintain direct access such facilities.
_ Conventional Development. A category for wholesale commercial, manufacturing,
warehousing, and other industrial uses with a floor area ratio less than .6.
Other acceptable land use activities allowed in this designation. shall include public,
institution, and conservation. Such activities shall be approved on a conditional
basis as set forth in the Land Development Code, shall function to serve land uses
within this designation, and shall be evaluated according to the intent to maintain
1 - 8
I
I
:1
.1
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
an industrial character. Intensities and densities of these secondary acceptable
uses are limited to those compatible with the industrial designation.
Planned Unit Development. Mixed uses within an industrial designation shall be
approved as a planned unit with industrial serving as the primary use together with
any combination of office, commercial, conservation, public or institutional.
Industrial uses must occupy a minimum of fifty percent of the developable land.
Intensity of secondary uses shall not be limited to less than the following:
commercial (.5 FAR), office (.3 FAR), public (.5). Open space shall comprise at
least thirty percent (30%) of the site area.
Location Criteria. A minimum of fifteen acres is required for a PUD. Planned unit
development is also subject to location criteria stipulated in Policy 3.7 of this
element.
h. General Planned Unit Development (PUD)
A classification for property approved as a planned unit development prior
to November 4, 1991 or for tracts under single ownership that exceed at
least fifty (50) acres and are located inside 3,500 feet of the City's legal
boundary lines.
Any land use specified and approved on a Master Land Use Plan for a proposed
PUD and not otherwise prohibited by the Comprehensive Plan or the Land
Development Code, are permitted in the planned unit development district. Such
activities shall be approved on a conditional basis as set forth in the Land
Development Code, shall function to serve the needs and character of the PUD,
and shall be limited to intensities and densities established for each respective
activity as set forth under policies of this Comprehensive Plan unless otherwise
specified below.
Maximum densities and intensities are as follows:
Residential: <5.0 du/ac gross density total units/total site acreage
Commercial: <.5 FAR
Office: <.3 FAR
Industrial: <.5 FAR
Land Use Allocation. A PUD shall be classified as either a residential, commercial,
or industrial planned unit development to identify the primary use associated with
the planned unit development. Any single secondary land use can not occupy a
proportional share of the development site greater than that accommodated by the
1 - 9
I
I
I
I
f
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
primary use. The applicant of development of a PUD shall select a primary use
through a Development Agreement established with the City.
Density Bonuses. A residential density bonus up to ten percent above the
maximum density of 5.0 du/ac (up to 5.5 du/ac) and an intensity bonus of
one/twentieth percentage points (.05) above the maximum acceptable floor area
ratio for commercial and office uses (.55 and .35 FAR, respectively) when utilizing
innovative design to preserve open space and conservation areas or to promote
internal traffic attainment or pedestrian and mass transit modes of transportation.
Location Criteria. A minimum of fifteen acres is required to accommodate the
General PUD designation. Planned unit designations must be served by collector
or arterial roadways, or by service roads connected thereto. PUD designations
must be served by central sewer and water services unless a development
agreement consistent with Section 163.32 to 163.3227 to 163.3243, F.S., commit
the. development to use central sewer service prior to reaching a specified
development threshold or by a specified date no later than the expiration date of the
development agreement.
j. Downtown Development Mixed Use District. The purpose of this designation
is to establish specific development standards and regulations to accomplish the
following:
1.) Revitalize the historic town center;
2.) Preserve and strengthen the crossroads/Old Oviedo character of the
historic town center;
3.) Improve traffic circulation and parking conditions in the historic town
center;
4.) Provide gathering places;
5.) Link old and new residential areas of the City;
6.) Include neo-traditional neighborhood design concepts;
a) integrated land uses,
b) on-street-parking,
c) narrow streets,
d) pedestrian orientation/amenities,
e) tree canopy,
1 - 10
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
d) "small town" scale and character.
7. Promote commercial and multifamily development along Division
Street.
Land Use Allocation. Within the Downtown Development District, minimum and maximum
allocation of land uses shall adhere to the following ranges:
Residential
Office
Commercial
Open Space
Minimum
Allocation
Maximum
. Allocation
35%
15%
15%
25%
70%
49%
49%
Maximum densities and intensities are as follows:
Residential:
Single-family
<5.0 du/ac gross density of
single family residential
development site
Multifamily
residential
< 15.0 du/ac gross density of multifamily
development site
Commercial:
- up to 1.0 FAR within 800 feet of
SR 434 / CR 426 intersection
- up to .75 FAR otherwise
Office:
up to .50 FAR within 800 feet of SR
434/CR 426 intersection
- up to .30 FAR otherwise
The geographic area included in the Downtown Mixed Use District is delineated in
Map A-13, Short Range Future Land Use Map.
1 - 11
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
k. Public
A category for public lands and institutions. Public lands shall be defined as
activities that serve to provide public services or utilities that shall include but
are not limited to recreation, community and government services, utilities
and public facilities such as water and sewer treatment. Institutions shall be
defined as activities that provide a public service that include but are not
limited to educational, cultural, or religious uses. Maximum intensity of use
allowed in this designation shall be a floor area ratio not more than .5.
Other activities permissible in this designation include conservation. Such activities
shall be approved on a conditional basis as set forth in the Land Development
Code, shall function to serve the primary use, and shall be limited to intensities and
densities compatible with the Public land use designation.
1 . Conservation
A category to protect the natural resources within the City of Oviedo and
provide permanent open space. Development of these areas will be severely
restricted in order to protect wildlife habitat, vegetative species, flood prone areas,
and water quality. Residential density shall not exceed 1 du/10 acres. Acceptable
activities include conservation, passive recreation, low density single family
residential, and limited agriculture. Acceptable land use activities shall be approved
on a conditional basis as set forth in the Land Development Code, shall function to
serve the need to preserve and conserve the natural resource, and shall be limited
to intensities and densities necessary to preserve and conserve the natural
resource but can be no greater than that which is compatible with the character of
the Conservation designation.
Silvaculture and agriculture activities shall not alter the flood water storage capacity
or natural flow regime of flood prone areas. The activity will not create any soil
erosion problems and must employ best management practices approved by the
U.S. Soil Conservation Service and Florida Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services.
Agriculture is not permitted in wetland areas except for grazing on existing
agricultural land. Silvaculture in wetlands is limited to removal of ten percent of the
trees over a five year period only on property designated in property tax records as
an agricultural exemption. Agriculture and silvaculture practices allowed in flood
prone areas and wetlands shall utilize best management practices approved by the
1 - 12
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
U.S. Forest Service, U.S. Soil Conservation Service, and Florida Department of
Agriculture and Consumer Services. Water quality in wetlands and adjacent
streams or water bodies shall not be adversely degraded and shall remain in its
natural ambient quality capable of supporting naturally occurring indigenous aquatic
flora and fauna.
1-1.1.2 Public utilities which provide essential services to existing and future land uses
authorized by this plan shall be permitted in all land use categories as PLI zoning or as
special exceptions in appropriate districts provided that established residential areas are
not disrupted and that any potential incompatibility is mitigated.
(Public facilities are defined as enterprises providing an essential service and regulated by
state or federal utility commissions, or services owned, franchised, or permitted by this
local government. Said facilities may include, but not be limited to, water towers, well
houses, utility poles, transmission towers, substations, sewage, communication equipment,
street lighting, and similar equipment.)
1-1.1.3 All development and rezoning requests shall conform to the Short Range Future
Land Use Map Series and to the Land Development Code of the City of Oviedo.
1-1.1.4 The City shall review all land development proposals for conformance to
stormwater management, open space, traffic circulation, parking, and other applicable
regulations in the Land Development Code.
1-1.1.5 The City shall evaluate at least the following in considering an amendment to the
Short Range Future Land Use Plan:
a. Conformance to the Long Range Future Land Use Designation.
b. Impact on established and projected levels of service.
c. Compatibility with existing and proposed land uses.
d. Current supply of vacant land already designated for the
proposed land use category.
e. Funding commitments for required improvements.
The applicant shall be financially responsible for constructing improvements required to
maintain adopted levels of service.
1-1.1.6 The Long Range Future Land Use Map Series shall be evaluated and updated at
least every 5 years. The Short Range Plan shall be updated and evaluated annually.
1 - 13
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1-1.1.7 (CPA 95-01; Ord. No. 936; Amended 5/15/95) (CPA 94-01; Ord. No. 913;
Amended 3/21/94 The City shall continue to coordinate and work with Seminole County
to jointly adopt an interlocal agreement by 19~5 1996 to define urban service areas, and
to determine mutually acceptable land use designations, and to specify potential
annexation areas. Such planning activity shall also address other intergovernmental
issues which must be incorporated into the Intergovernmental Coordination Element in
1997. as required by Section 163.3177. Florida Statutes.
1-1.1.8 Medium and high density residential, commercial, office, and industrial uses shall
provide or connect to a central sanitary sewer system in accordance with the goals,
objectives and policies of the sanitary sewer subelement of this plan.
1-1.1.9 In areas where central sewer service is not available, medium and high density
residential, office, commercial, and industrial development may be approved with the
interim use of a septic tank or a package plant provided that the standards and conditions
of the Comprehensive Plan and the Land Development Code are met or exceeded.
1-1.1.10 In accordance with F.S. 163.3202, the City shall adopt land development
regulations for the land use categories of the Future Land Use Map. Said regulations shall
also include standards for signage, subdivision of land, and use of areas subject to
seasonal or periodic flooding. Said regulations shall be adopted prior to April 1, 1992.
1-1.1.11 The environmentally sensitive areas depicted in the Future Land Use Map Series
shall constitute an overlay zone to identify potential wetland and floodplain areas of special
concern. No new development may be approved in this area unless the
following can be demonstrated:
a. The property does not actually lie within the 100 year
floodplain or contain viable wetlands OR:
b. There is no disturbance of wildlife habitat.
c. There is no loss of flood storage capacity.
d. There is no disturbance of native vegetation.
e. There is no negative impact on natural resources OR
f. There is an overriding public concern that necessitates disturbance or
alteration. Mitigation will be required if this disturbance or alteration is
approved.
1 - 14
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1-1.2. OBJECTIVE: To provide needed services, local employment opportunities, and an
increased tax base by encouraging more retail and office development.
Measure: The City shall encourage more retail, office, and light industrial development by
designating at least 20 acres per 1000 population for commercial and office use and 10
acres per 1000 population for light industrial.
Policies:
1-1.2.1 (CPA 95-01; Ord. No.936; Amended 5/15/95; Amended 7-19-93. The City shall
permit neighborhood commercial and professional office uses as special exceptions as
small scale land use map amendments in residential areas. Each These commercial and
office site uses is limited to a maximum of two developable acres. The following
conditions and criteria apply to such situations:
a. The site must be located on or at the intersection of a local road with a
collector or arterial roadway, or intersections of collector or arterial roadways;
b. If not located at the intersection of a collector or arterial roadway, there shall
be at least 500 feet between the proposed site and any existing commercial
development;
c. The development shall be designed to serve the immediate residential
neighborhood;
d. The development intensity for commercial uses shall be less than a .5 FAR
and for office uses less than a .3 FAR and hours of operation limited in
accordance with traffic impact, visual compatibility, and natural site
conditions;
e. Convenient and safe pedestrian and non-motorized vehicular access must
be provided;
1-1.2.2 The City shall increase the retail market demand by encouraging multi-family
development adjacent to commercially designated areas.
1 - 15
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"--
I
I
I
,I
I
I
I
I
I
1-1.2.3 Commercial development shall provide a landscape buffer as required by the Land
Development Code to ensure compatibility and ~essen the impact on any adjacent
residential land uses.
1-1.2.4 (CPA 95-01; Ord. No.936; Amended 5/15/95) Commercial development shall be
located in the areas of the City with full urban services such as water, sewer, and fire and
police protection. These facilities and services shall meet locally established level of
service standards concurrent with the impact of any proposed development. Commercial
development may use interim on-site sewer facilities as consistent with policies of the
Comprehensive Plan.
1-1.2.5 Commercial and office areas shall be located near the geographic center of the
City and at major arterial and collector intersections.
1-1.2.6 Commercial site plans shall be evaluated to ensure adequate pedestrian access.
1-1.2.7 The Land Development Code shall be revised to include floor area ratios, flexible
height and setback requirements, and other design criteria to protect on-site natural
features and maintain compatibility with adjacent land uses.
1-1.2.8 (CPA 95-01; Ord. No. 936; Amended 5/15/95) The City shall first extend water
and sewer services to areas currently zoned commercial, offICe and industrial to stimulate
development promote a diversified tax base and provide employment opportunities for
Oviedo residents.
1.1.2.9 (CPA 95-01; Ord. No. 936; Amended 5/15/95) A regional commercial.
business. and industrial center shall be promoted within the general area lying within a
5.000 foot radial distances from the intersection of the Seminole Greeneway and Mitchell
Hammock/Red Bug Lake Road.
1-1.3. OBJECTIVE: (CPA 95-01; Ord. No. 936; Amended 5/15/95; CPA 94-01; Ord. No.
913; Amended 3/21/94) To prevent urban sprawl by encouraging more intense
development in the central core area of the City, by limiting annexation for areas to the
north and east of the City and by not extending central sewer service to fringe areas
adjacent to rural development located to the north and east of the annexation line
established in Map 1-1 unless such service is necessary to protect water quality of Lake
Jessup or the Econlockhatchee f1i'ler.
Measure: Amended 3/21/94 By 4993- 1995 the City shall adopt an inter-local agreement
with Seminole County defining urban service areas and restricting annexation of rural
areas.
Policies:
1 - 16
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1-1.3.1 High density residential developments shall be located in close proximity to
commercial centers, with safe and adequate pedestrian access.
1-1.3.2 High density developments shall provide easily accessible, common amenities and
open space.
1-1.3.3 High density development along and adjacent to the S.R. 434 corridor shall
provide for safe and efficient pedestrian and non-motorized vehicular access to the
University area and adjacent commercial services.
1-1.3.4 High density development shall be permitted only in areas with complete urban
services, including central sewer, water, and fire and police protection.
1-1.3.5 CPA-95-01; Ord. No. 936; Amended 5/15/95; Development along the eastern
and northern boundaries of the City shall be limited to agriculture, and large-lot
single-family uses, and neighborhood retail as already allowed through Policy 1-1.2.1 to
create a transition area between urban and rural areas. Large-lot shall be defined as the
minimum area necessary to accommodate the use of on-site septic tanks systems. given
soil conditions and environmental constraints.
1-1.3.6 The City shall encourage development of vacant parcels near the geographic
center of the City by extending sewer service to these areas.
1-1.3.7 Amended 7-19-93. The following location criteria shall apply to all planned unit
developments located in a PUD designation:
a. access to planned unit developments requires arterial or collector roadway
facilities.
b. PUD development shall locate within a central water and sewer service area,
or, where such systems are not yet available, such facilities must be
available concurrent with impacts generated by the PUD or provided
according to a Development Agreement consistent with provisions of
Sections 163.3227 to 163.3243, F.S. Any interim sewer services provided
for residential land uses shall be consistent with provisions of this
comprehensive plan. No interim water and sewer services shall be allowed
for non-residential land uses unless a Development Agreement specifies a
threshold or time frame when such central services must be available.
c. Centers for commercial, office and industrial land uses within a PUD,
whether as a primary or secondary land use, must locate on an arterial or
collector roadway facility, or local service roads connected thereto.
1 - 17
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Professional office associated with a residential mixed-use structure may
locate on local roads. Commercial and office may locate on local streets in
residential areas if such uses are designed to serve the retail and service
needs of the surrounding neighborhood, maintain the residential character
of the area, require minimal and infrequent access by truck or heavy vehicles
other than public transit, and do not create roadway impacts that resemble
characteristics and traffic volumes of a collector facility.
d. Location of land uses within a PUD shall be oriented and designed with
consideration to existing and proposed adjacent land uses. Appropriate
buffering is mandatory where incompatible land uses occur adjacent to
adjoining properties to the PUD. Incompatible land uses within a PUD shall
be appropriately buffered as well to the extent necessary to preclude the
creation of auditory, visual, or olfactory nuisances.
e. Commercial and office land uses located along arterial and collector
roadways shall be clustered in nodes and integrated with other land uses to
prevent strip development.
f. Commercial and office uses within a residential PUD shall be limited in size
and scape compatible with service needs related to residential demands
generated within the Planned Unit Development. Such commercial and
office activities shall serve a market oriented to retail and service demands
and needs of the surrounding neighborhood. Any allocation above a
minimum demand to serve residential land uses within a residential planed
unit development shall be based on regional market demand. The burden
to demonstrate regional demand is placed on the applicant of the proposed
development, demonstrated by the developer in a study prepared by
professional economists, commercial realtors, or site location planners.
1-1.3.8 The City shall not increase the land use intensity of the active agricultural areas
along W. Mitchell Hammock Road until the interior portions of the City have been
urbanized.
1-1.3.9 (CPA95-01; Ord. No. 936; Amended 5/15/95) In order to prevent the extension
of urban development into rural areas, the City shall recognize Lake Jessup as a natural
northern boundary to further annexation. and also shall not annex any additional property
east of Van Arsdalc Street unless there is an overriding public hcalth, safety, or welfare
concern.
1-1.3.10 CPA 94-01; Ord. No. 913; Amended 3/21/94: The City shall not annex any
additional property to the north or east of the annexation boundary established in Map 1-1
other than designated enclaves until the City and the County have adopted the interlocal
1 - 18
I
:1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
~
I
$
~
I
FLORIDA AVE
,
N
I
I
SCALE. I' '" 1200'
I
I
I
i
I
*
__J
I
I
I
CITY iOF OVIEDO
/MAP 1-1
ANNEX~TION BOUNDARY
NO'JjEMBER 1993
· - - -.. ANNEXATION LINE
I
i
I r--
, I
I _
I
(! 0
- - ~ /"::)
b U
I
SJ FJ: i
o L___+.J
I
)
()
()
re-
I !
I
, I
___.__________Ij
I
1-19
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
agreement (Policy 1.7) addressing land uses and services. Prior to annexing any land, the
City shall demonstrate that public facilities and services shall be available consistent with
adopted level of service standards, or must prepare a financially feasible plan that
demonstrates how any capacity deficiency shall be eliminated through the Capital
Improvement Element.
1-1.4. OBJECTIVE: To redevelop and upgrade substandard development and blighted
areas.
Measure: By 2010, all City streets providing access to more than ten homes and/or
businesses will be paved, and non-conforming situations will be reduced by 50%.
Policies:
1-1.4.1 The City will continue to enforce the Land Development Code provision requiring
"any substantial change in land use" (as defined in the Land Development Code) to meet
current development standards.
1-1.4.2 The City will continue to require that all public facilities adjacent to proposed
development be upgraded to LDC standards concurrent with construction.
1-1.4.3 The City will continue to pursue Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
funding for roadway and drainage improvements in the City's target low-income areas.
(Avenue B and Johnson Hill in the northeastern part of the City).
1-1.4.4 The City will pursue funding mechanisms to provide central sewer service in the
medium density, low-income residential areas.
1-1.4.5 The City will continue its Code Enforcement program to ensure that land uses
continue to operate in conformance with the Land Development Code.
1-1.4.6 The City will incorporate the historical town center into a downtown development
district by 1992 to provide a plan and funding program for redevelopment and
bea utifrcation.
1-1.4.7 By 1993 the City shall identify antiquated plats and develop procedures and
criteria for maintaining compatibility and levels of service in these areas.
1-1.5. OBJECTIVE: To preserve and maintain existing and future residential
neighborhoods.
1 - 20
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Measure: The City shall monitor requests for land use and zoning changes from residential
categories to more intense classifications, and identify potential transition areas.
Policies:
1-1.5.1 (CPA 95-01; Ord. No. 936; Amended 5/15/95) Traffic circulation patterns will be
reviewed to discourage through traffic on local streets within in residential neighborhoods.
1-1.5.2 (CPA 95-01; Ord. No. 936; Amended 5/15/95 Any proposed road improvements
will be evaluated for land use impacts to existing neighborhoods, and vehicular
connections to residential local streets will be designed to accommodate only local traffic.
1-1.5.3 Land development regulations will include buffer, landscape, and site design
standards to ensure land use compatibility and prevent negative impact on residential
development.
1-1.5.4 (CPA 95-01; Ord. No. 936; Amended 5/15/95) Industrial land uses shall not be
located adjacent to single family residential development without appropriate buffers and
compatibility requirements as outlined in the land Development Code. Likewise. residential
land uses shall not be located adiacent to industrial development without appropriate
buffers and compatibility requirements as outlined in the land development code.
1-1.6. OBJECTIVE: Amended 7-19-93. Protection of Historic and Archaeological Sites.
Historic and archaeological sites shall be protected from destruction, removal, or alteration
and from impacts of adjacent incompatible land uses through implementations of the
following policies:
Policies:
1-1.6.1 Historic Identification. Buildings shall be distinguished as historic if one or more
of the following criteria are met:
a. The site is listed on the National Register of Historic Places (National Park
Service, U.S. Dept. of Interior), of the Florida Site File .(Division of Historic
Resources, Florida Dept. of State;
1 - 21
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
b. The structure was built by citizens of Oviedo to honor the City residents who
gave their lives during world War II;
c. The building structure, or object exceeds fifty years in age and represents
the last remaining example of its kind in the neighborhood or town.
d. Documented proof indicates that the site contributed a significant role in the
history of Seminole County or the State of Florida.
1-1.6.2 Protection of Archaeological Sites. An archaeological evaluation of any potentially
significant archaeological site shall be required prior to development approval.
The developer shall notify the City and the Florida Department of State, Division of
Historical Resources, to any archaeological findings discovered during land preparation or
construction. Upon such a discovery, development plans may be altered according to
requirements of the State Division of Historical Resources to preserve, remove, or
conserve the archaeological findings.
1-1.6.3 All identified historic and archaeological resources shall be illustrated on the Future
Land Use Map.
1-1.6.4 Protection from Adjacent Incompatible Land Use. To ensure that land uses
adjacent to historic resources remain compatible and that potential negative impacts are
mitigated to protect a historic sites's character, new development and redevelopment shall
be subject to specific mechanisms, including but not limited to buffers, constraints on
roadway development, screening, design and renovation standards, open space, and
density or intensity above or beyond that required in the Land Development Code, but only
to the extent necessary to preserve the historic character of the adjacent historic land use.
Necessary measures to protect the historic resources shall be determined during the
development review process.
1-1.6.5 The City shall request that the Oviedo Historical Society recommend locally
significant structures and sites to be included on the official listing of historic resources.
1-1.6.6 Protection of Historic Sites. Alteration or modification of a designated historic site
shall conform to guidelines set forth in the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's "Standards for
Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings". In the event a
designated historic site is proposed for demolition, the City shall follow standards contained
in the "Historic Americans Buildings Survey" to evaluate and measure the merits of razing
the structure.
1 - 22
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1-1.7. OBJECTIVE: To create a downtown development district that will provide a
gathering place, revitalize the historic town center, and link the old and new residential
areas of the City.
Measure: By 1992, the City will adopt a specific plan and design standards for a
downtown development district.
Policies:
1-1.7.1 The new development plan will include mixed land uses with an emphasis on
pedestrian orientation and access.
1-1.7.2 On street parking and rear parking lots shall be required in most areas of the town
center.
1-1.7.3 Front and sideyard setbacks may be eliminated in some areas of the new district.
1-1.8. OBJECTIVE: To protect the City's natural resources by establishing an acquisition
program, by requiring conservation easements over wetlands and habitat areas, and by
providing for adequate review and analysis of development proposals.
Measure: By 1992 the City shall adopt an Open Space Impact Fee to provide funding for
acquisition of wetlands, native vegetative communities, and habitats for threatened and
endangered species.
Policies:
1-1.8.1 The City shall declare the Protection Zone of the Econ River (as defined in the
Econ Protection Ordinance No. 854) to be a natural resource of both regional and local
significance and preserve it in accordance with the City and State protection regulations.
1-1.8.2 The City shall coordinate with Seminole County, the SJRWMD, and the
Department of Natural Resources to regulate, protect and acquire natural resources, by
exchanging information and combining financial commitments and resources when
appropriate.
1 - 23
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1-1.8.3 The Future Land Use Map Series shall indicate well field protection zones for each
of the City's potable water wells, and development shall be restricted in accordance with
a well field protection ordinance.
1-1.8.4 Amended 7-19-93. By April, 1992 the Land Development Regulations adopted
pursuant to F.S. 163.32 shall incorporate regulations and control that are consistent with
policies of the Comprehensive Plan governing the preservation and maintenance of natural
resources for the following issues:
a. increased buffers and building setbacks along rivers, lakes and creeks;
b. development and use restrictions in well field protection zones to prevent septic
tanks, underground storage, and hazardous waste storage;
c. evaluation criteria for determining wetland value
d. requirements for upland buffers around wetlands in the
designated conservation areas;
e. requirements that the water flow and hydro period be maintained in wetland
areas;
f. provision for density transfer programs;
g. provision to include preserved, maintained wetlands as required open space;
1-1.8.5 Jurisdictional wetlands and areas below the 100 year flood elevation shall not
constitute land area for the purposes of fulfilling minimum lot sizes.
1-1.8.6 The City shall pursue an inter-local agreement with Seminole County for wetlands
evaluation and regulation of areas outside the jurisdiction of the St. Johns River Water
Management District.
1-1.9. OBJECTIVE: To ensure the availability of suitable land for utility facilities
necessary to support proposed development by identifying future utility land use and
service needs.
Measure: By 1992 the City shall adopt formal agreements with local utilities to provide an
information exchange regarding future land use and service requirements.
1 - 24
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Policies:
1-1.9.1 The City shall require that all development proposals include a needs assessment
of essential services.
1-1.9.2 The City shall submit annual reports to designated utilities and entities providing
essential services to the City to aid in future planning and programming.
1-1.9.3 The City shall continue to evaluate all development requests and secure
easements over areas that could be used for future well fields.
1-1.10. OBJECTIVE: To ensure that adequate public services and facilities are available
concurrent with development impact to maintain established levels of service.
Measure: The Short Range Land Use Plan and the 5-Year Capital Improvements Plan
shall be reviewed annually to ensure that adequate facilities are available or funded to
serve the designated land uses.
Policies:
1-1.10.1 If development needs and services precede the funded improvements of the 5
year CIP, the developer shall be responsible for installing the required improvements as
a condition of plan approval. Committed funds will be reimbursed to the Developer in
accordance with the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan up to, but not exceeding the
actual construction cost of the completed improvement. If a required improvement is not
included in the Five Year Capital Plan, the developer shall not be eligible for
reimbursement, and shall bear the total cost of the required improvement.
1-1.10.2 The City shall require private investment in infrastructure improvements above
and beyond specific Land Development Code criteria whenever and wherever these
improvements are needed to accommodate the development and minimize the public cost
of growth. These improvements may include, but not be limited to ROW donation,
signalization, access roads, etc.
1-1.11. OBJECTIVE: Amended 7-19-93. To encourage the use of innovative land
development regulations by requiring certain areas to adhere to a specific development
plan and providing density and land use bonuses for mixed use developments as allowed
under Objective 1.
1 - 25
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Measure: The Land Development Code shall be amended by April 1, 1992, to provide
density, intensity, and land uses bonuses for Planned Unit Developments with
appropriately mixed land uses as allowed under Objective 1.
Policies:
1-1.11.1 By 1992 the City shall develop a specific plan for the Downtown Development
District that includes a neo-traditional neighborhood design with on-street parking and
integrated land uses.
1-1.11.2 Left intentionally blank.
1-1.11.3 The City shall continue to include flexibility in certain portions of the Land
Development Code to accommodate innovative design.
GOALS-2Y
1 - 26
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES
-- Short Range (1996) land Use Map
-- long Range (2010) land Use Map
-- Environmental Overlay
-- Traffic Circulation
-- Flood Plain Map
-- Soils Map
-- Wetlands
-- Park Facilities
*This map illustrates only those land use designations that differ from the Short Range
Designations.
Interpretation of Land Use District Boundaries
Except as otherwise specifically provided, the Land Use designation shown within
boundaries on the Official Land Use Map indicates that Land Use regulations pertaining
to the Land Use extend through the whole area surrounded by the boundary line. Where
uncertainly exists as to the boundaries of any land use shown on said maps, the following
rules shall apply:
1) Where boundaries are indicated as approximately following street and alley lines,
land lot lines, or military district lines, such line shall be construed to be the
boundary.
2) In un-subdivided property or tracts, where a Land Use boundary divides a tract, the
location of such boundaries shall be determined by use of the scale appearing on
the Official Land Use Map.
3) Where a public road, street, or alley is officially vacated or abandoned the
regulations applicable to the property to which it is reverted shall apply to such
vacated or abandoned road, street, or alley.
1-27
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4) Where boundaries are so indicated that they are approximately parallel to the center
lines or street lines of streets, or to the central lines of alley line or alleys, or the
center lines of right-of-way lines of highways, such boundaries shall be construed
as being parallel thereto and boundaries shall be determined by use of the scale
appearing on the Official Land Use Map.
5) Conservation District boundaries must be field verified on an individual basis
through thorough site analysis.
Interpretation of Environmental Overlay Boundaries
The areas designated on the Environmental Overlay encompass wetland and 100 year
floodplain areas. The boundaries are generalized and must be verified on an individual
basis through thorough site analysis.
PUD DESIGNATIONS
Explanations of the approved and/or anticipated number of housing units and other
acreages are attached to the maps.
1-28
I
I
I
I
I
I
,.......
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
l
I
I
I
I
I
T 2~ S.
MAP 1.3
LOR
"';e:
..~.\jjll''''''~l ".,~r:j I:;.
c
AI.
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/
/
PUO
~T.-
I
1\
I
O~I(OO CI ~:Ulrs
I
LOR Jf
I
I
/
I
I
I
CITY I OF OVIEDO
2010 LONG RANGE LAND USE
I
~
RL
C COHSERVATlON (CAJU... ~_ ___I
Al IUtAL. (d~,
UlR LDN ~ RESIDENTW. (1-3-5 GVlIcI
MDR UEDlJM DEHSITY RESlDENT1AL (3.6-8.0 ~I
,
HOR HGH DENSITY RESIDENJ1AL (8.1.15 cMibel
CM~
IN NlUSTRIAL
p P\.IIUC;
PUD PUD/MIXED USE
_ _ _ NEW AOAOS
I
: .'?
: wtu'iNGH......
'lO.
\
c
c.AJlL .'
'.
PUO
AIrpwt ~
i...:.:
'),
.'
'",
C?
CHN'MNl RD.
.
..
- .
"'1 ~ 0
I-~j .
,
I
I.
e=.
:~..:..'''''j
.~
'\,
f;]\
I . I
---r"---
'I.
'1.<..,
I.::.....
. ;-~.'
.rl
. -'.. .', ..... :......
j; (*) In lie1J :o;f the conneqtor s : ....i.
'from S.R. 426 to Red Bug Lake 0..
bridge connecting from '5.R: 426 ove " the'-
Seminole Greeneway thr6ugh the . \__"
vtfHto-Cnr.rS11rgi)~.f~irar occur.' .
-~
_ .J~
o SOD IDOO 2000
...... . OV'I
~
/,
/ ,~
..~ . 0
~ i 0
. n LOR
01 ~
01 : g
~I ! ~
gr- . ,--, 0
.:1a
(1) Oviedo Crossing Terrace
(2) Westgate Road
Ch~
1-30
I
I
I
I
I
I
p-
I
I
I
I ,
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
MAP 1.4
. ~r;...-"\ ;;::0
CITY OF OVIEDO
ENVIROMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS
YEAR 2010
~e2end
Enviromentally Sensitive Areas
(Shaded)
: :':'-l:...o.......~
d.
~
mm
~
CHAPMAN RD
.JI;~':'1i
',,,,,," "".... ,..
I' ..~:~;:: ~;:;
.............. ....
fJJ lHiiii:":; > ~;~v
~!" Tiii ,ill'"
:_! .."'d' . ~;
8ClUIlCE:
aT. _ _ __----T I8TNCT
~~II~ rr~
-
-
o 500 tDOO
lICOU .. fHT
1--
2000
~~
Prepared: Sept. 1991
1-31
~I
I
I
'I
I
I
, r-
I~
I
I
I
I
I
I
1\
I'
I'
-I
I
I
2 MiC
nnllll)A
.'~'~
2 MiC
CANOPY ROAD
. .1.~.! : :I!: I (;'::r.: I' ~:J
4A
,
..,r"
..4VA
'1 .
!
r--- -'
I ___.:
I
I
CHAf'LlAH RD.
L _'
4 MA
LEGEND
,..-..
//
"-.~. _....,"
4 A
. J L- Functional Classification
ART .. ARTERIAl
MA" MINOR ARTERiAl
MaC .. MAJOR COLLECTOR
Number MlC .. MINOR COLlECTOR
of Lanes C c COLLECTOR
I.I..\ITI'I~
1.4 Ji'~..~
~Ua Ii ..1
,......1.1.....
MAP 1.5
CfTY OF OVI EDO
TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ELEMENT
,
i
i
YEA:R 2010 TRAFFIC
I
CIRCULATION PLAN
.1
"~rHGHA"
RO.
.r~.
.;,'T I I..
,3 Fe; 'r I
/ ~ '-nLj_
~
:"
I
I
.______.. ..J
.:
I.
rd
I-
I.
I~
I!
I>>
__---'0
~~.-?~1
-.
'"
"
~:
L.n___\
.
1
~
~~.-..,
t.:_
'1...
~ :
-- nn_-1
(*) In lieu: of the connector shown
from S.R. ~26 to Red Bug Lake Road
via Winter :Sprin~s Blvd., an alterhative
bridge con1necting from S.R. 426 6ver the
-. -, '- 1
Seminole Greeneway through the I
Oviedo Crossing D.R.I. may. occur;
I
I
)
, "
" '-.
\ "
~
_ i;
- -
:",';0:,'
',':;l...f. #. rf.f'
1-32
{?
s
,
,
I
'"
.....
'0
FIGURE B-1
_ B-3
I
I
I
I'
I
r
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
L.
I
I'
I
I
I'
SOURCE: FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS
CITY OF OVIEDO 8-28-78. SEMINOLE COUNTY 5-5-81 & SEMINOLE COUNTY SOIL SURVEY 1887 INTERIM REPORT
II
. I,
5
I I"m
18' %
hi:
i' . r-...I
. j I
r' I
i r..J
u t
( I
, I
I
L__-,
I
I
I
I
_J
./
/
./
/
.../ 20
./
/
':HAPMAN ROAD
28
32
~
MAP 1.6
AREAS SUS.JECT TO FLOODING
FLORIDA 2 AVENUE
6
o
~
SOILS SUBJECT TO OCCASIONAL
OR FREQUENT FLOODING
100-YEAR FLOOD BOUNDARY
5
1
N
CITY LIMITS
11
-~~\~UN~~~I 15
(TYPICALl . I
.j
o
x:
::H
0::
U/
./
"... 23
/
~f
-I'
~\.
or
....
or
~21~. !@ ~
o<V
@
. I
a::
en
~
I
~I
I
__J - n
IOO-YEAR t
2 7 FLOCO BOUNDARY
(TnICALl
I .,
o
fP-t'lt.' .' i
..,.....
/
34./
~/
~i
0:
I
I
FIGURE .A-S
CLACE I
RADCLIFFE. lie.
ENGINEERS .P\.ANNERS
SURVEY
35
3
_~(Y
1990
35
~,~
J::;
ORANGE
t -\ ~
1:-33
ill
I
I
I
Iii
MAP 1.7
LEGEND
IIllIIIIII &lW.
AOAM8VILL&-IPA.&R rtNI auOlS
AIlUTS. (I "0 ~ 1'~II:Cu-r SLOPU
UTA1VLA. ,...11 auu, 0 TU ~ pKJtc&Jl1' .lOrU
UTATUl.A-APO'U UNa "AMOS. 0 TO 5 puctHT 8WPU
6A.IllItGD AND O&LaAr rUlE "ANUS
10
11
11
11
BASle=Ga, SARaUs..A AJlO ~ awu.s, DEPW18OIO;&4&.
MSIWGU UO aII...JUlA PINt: BA)riIUS. oa,aullOllAJ..
CAllQVA AltO TEIlM eftA IfUCU
aAUCALLJ' AND lJOlOaAUI r U'I 8A111OS
u
llCltOaAu& ....0
JJ
aalQfTOtl. l!IAJUULA AltO IUaDI.L MUCIUI
11
KALA"'" r1ll1& ......0
30
n'i'AIlAA AIIO EAUCALLIE fUtl: 6AIII~
u
'AOLA-ST. well aUlJa. 0 TO , .&II<.:IMT 8l.UPU
JI
,..IDA 'U'I SAItO
JJ
l"l.JMlu.o nlll IliAIIO. Co! TO ., P&aCaM'I' aUlPt:'
u
fQltPAllO "... 61.110. OCCASJOItAu.r rLDODW
u
ST. JOIIU UO EAlJC.AU-.II fill. .....US
u
TAYU1S-IIIUMO....a:... 'lifE SAIlIDS, 0 TO 5 ..IlJIC&IIT aLDI'U
..
va.,... tAMD
CITY OF OVIEDO
Soils Map
NTS
_'.._~I.>......,":~ ~_...T.-'~.-:-,~.~'<o:i..~':..=<,,, '_O'-;;'_""O"~~"h"~';Z'~""'':;~'''''':''
,.'ol::1~'.I! ;,;ai'!t! ~.~;,..+.;.:.",.
1
N
1-34
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.,
I
,I
I
I
,.... 'I
'.I! ~ II Ii'
,
,
I
CITY OF OVIEDO
WETlAIT\!IDS
~LlP tJo$
,
!1~GE~D
~_:_---
- -- - -
::~{~~
-- WETLANDS
I
',',ill:iin.;/IM.l
8, ~
o '
o i[1\~,/~;5)- ,_':~~: CV,C,
-: :. . :_::; ~-
- "-'. -..
~- .-. - : ." -'::. .
{1 -:="~::"" ',' {=?<
.: --...... --'
. - - -
- -.- -. .
--~ - 0 ~,.-, '0".,
, -
. .
t>O
o
-~
~
SOUllCE: ST, JOt04S RJVal WATElI WIHAIlEJaNT DISTRlCT
Le~
!:. I .J~
o !OO 1000 2000
SCAU IN FEET
r1> GLA~
\.D K~~~~
1-35
~c-
/.v
,/ II --
rfA
==-=--:--1~f+-== /
I ~ /
)1./
~I
lit
REO:"LG' ~!J
..... 'If
1
f
1
1
1
~
I
I
I
:.~..~':.~: - .:fr.C ~o
I
I
I
I,
I
.1
I
I'
-I
I;
I'
I
I
-I
I
I
- ,2' s
..::.:- :
;--,
i :
r-- '
"-1 J
.. L-__
/:
I
'-
J
--:';IEO~:';I~!.-
CHAPMAN RD.
I
I
I
I
1--- I
L-- --L_J
..... ...;
II ." .'
--- "::.. Ci"7l /~ 0
I ~~ ; ~
I to" r-
.___J 7 g
,- 01 ~
,/ ~:' g
I~---- r~ --~ ~
, 0
~-------- ~ .
...d)."l".: ........!f;
'-.
L~E ,:~YES RD
MAP 1.9
CITY OF OVIEDO
RECREATIONAL FACILITIES
I
~I
Al SCHOOlS
e,~AWCS
@
.'
COIoMHTY AWCS
....,'lU.'j'.'[j.H......
OD I
! ,- ~...---,
I i~ \,~/
!~
.:---~-
,~
0'-
~!
. U'
. I
~--_--2__
.---../ ~
'/~J(
J~~
I " "
I '"
,I '\
, "'-,
......"
'\../
:1 I
I
R. 31 E.l"il32-r-------------,-1
i
I
Ch~
l'
I' -
-
10 5......
IICIU II OUT
I
'0..
1-38
;1
'I
il
I
I'
,I
:1,
:1
'I'
I
,1
II'
II
11'
,11
'II'
, ,II
'II
II
TRAFFIC CIRCULATION
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I:
I
I
I
I
TRAFFIC CIRCULATION
GOALS. OBJECTIVES. AND POLICIES
INTRODUCTION: The Traffic Circulation Map is included in the Future Land Use Map
Series. The transportation improvements needed to support the Short Range Plan are
included on the Land Use Map and in the 5 year Capital Improvements Plan (CIP). The
plan will be evaluated annually to verify assumptions and to assess the overall
performance of the system.
The City has chosen to develop a plan that recognizes areas of jurisdiction, control, and
influence. Through-traffic (traffic that neither begins nor ends its trip in Oviedo) is the major
source of transportation problems within the City, but it is a force over which the City has
very little control. The City has therefore provided alternative routes for through-traffic
and developed a local street system that will keep local traffic off of through routes. The
intersection of S.R. 426 and S.R. 434 has already been designated as "constrained", and
the current population figures support including Oviedo within the Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT) urban boundary. For these reasons, the Traffic Circulation Plan
relies on Urban level of service standards. (9J-5.0055(1)(d).
The City has also chosen to expand the role of the traffic circulation element beyond simply
providing capacity for projected vehicular trips. The City recognizes that street
design has a major role in defining community character. The City chooses not to be
bisected by major four-lane facilities and chooses not to let increased daily traffic justify
more intense development.
2-1 GOAL: TO SET FORTH A PLAN FOR THE OVIEDO STREET SYSTEM THAT
MEETS THE FUTURE TRAVEL NEEDS OF OVIEDO, WHILE CONTINUING THE
UNIQUE QUALITY OF LIFE IN THE CITY.
2-1.1. OBJECTIVE: To maintain a traffic level of service that balances traffic safety,
convenience and efficiency with other community objectives.
Measure: The City shall use its concurrency management system to ensure that all
development meets the criteria outlined in the following policies:
2 - 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Policies:
2-1.1.1 The adopted level of service will be consistent, to the maximum extent feasible,
with FOOT guidelines.
2-1.1.2 The adopted level of service definitions shall be the current version of the FDOT
Generaliz.ed Guidelines.
2-1.1.3 CPA-95-01, Ord. No. 936; 5/15/95) The adopted level of service for all roads
other than commuter routes shall be Level-of-service (LOS) "D". The adopted LOS for
commuter routes shall be "E". The LOS for the Seminole Greeneway is LOS "C".
2-1.1.4 S.R. 426, S.R. 434, Mitchell Hammock Road, Lockwood Boulevard, and the
Seminole County Expressway shall be designated as commuter routes.
2-1.1.5 The City shall continue to enforce and update the access management sections
of the Land Development Code to reduce loadings and access points.
2-1.1.6 The access management sections of the City's Land Development Code shall be
consistent with the FDOT access management policy.
2-1.1.7 By 1992 the city shall develop a special land use plan and development standards
for a district surrounding S.R. 426 between Mitchell Hammock Road and S.R. 434 in order
to maintain and/or improve the current level of service for that facility. This district will
include at least the properties fronting on S.R. 426.
2-1.1.7(A) CPA-95-01; Ord. No.936; 5/15/95; To eliminate a future capacity deficiency
on S.R. 426 from Mitchell Hammock Road to Winter Springs Boulevard. a parallel north-
south collector road shall be constructed between S.R. 426 and the Seminole Greeneway
by 1998.
2-1.1.8 The S.R. 434/S.R. 426 intersection and its approaches are identified as
backlogged.
2-1.1.9 Constrained roads are:
* S.R. 434 from Mitchell Hammock Road to North City limit
*S. R. 426 from Mitchell Hammock Road to C.R. 426
* C.R. 426 from C.R. 419 to City limit
*C.R. 419 from C.R. 426 to Lockwood Boulevard
2 - 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2-1 .1.10 Amended 7-19-93. Along constrained facilities the City will allow new
development which will not increase peak-hour traffic volumes by more than 15 percent of
the 1991 traffic counts unless acceptable traffic mitigation measures are provided to ensure
that the LOS is not degraded more than 15 percent. Current traffic volumes are stated in
the support document of this Comprehensive Plan.
2-1.2. OBJECTIVE: To ensure adequate funding for the long-range traffic circulation plan.
Measure: By 1992 the City shall revise the current transportation impact fee ordinance
and adopt adequate fee schedules to cover at least the costs of improvements
identified in the Traffic Circulation Element.
Policies:
2-1.2.1 The City shall identify required right-of-way, and secure it during the development
approval process.
2-1.2.2 The Land Development Code shall be revised to require a full range of lighting,
landscaping and planting as part of development approval.
2-1.2.3 The City shall pursue County and State funding for County and State road
improvements, but shall also include the cost of these facility improvements in the City
impact fee ordinance to ensure a funding source.
2-1.2.4 Donation of ROW to upgrade adjacent substandard facilities, to improve the local
transportation network, or to conform to the Master Transportation Plan shall be required
of all applicable development approvals, including rezoning and annexations.
2-1.3. OBJECTIVE: To develop a traffic circulation plan that is coordinated with FOOT,
Seminole County and Winter Springs transportation plans.
Measure: The City shall annually review the FDOT, Seminole County and the City of
Winter Springs transportation plans, and assess their consistency with the City's Traffic
Circulation Element (TCE). The City will identify inconsistencies, and will notify the relevant
planning agency of these inconsistencies. The City will then negotiate a
resolution of the inconsistency.
2 - 3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Policies:
2-1.3.1 The City shall adopt the measurement of Level of service as set forth in the current
FDOT Generalized Guidelines.
2-1.3.2 CPA-95-01; Ord. No. 936; 5/19/95) The City shall adopt, to the maximum extent
feasible, the FDOT guidelines for minimum level of service. The City's adopted guidelines
are LOS "D" on all non-commuter routes, and LOS "E" on commuter routes. (Commuter
routes are defined in Policy 8.2.) The LOS for the Seminole Greeneway is LOS "C".
2-1.3.3 The City shall adopt Seminole County's future traffic projections for long range
planning and coordination.
2-1.3.4 The City shall coordinate plans with FDOT, Seminole County and the City of
Winter Springs.
2-1.3.5 The City shall recognize and rely on the five-year work programs from FDOT and
Seminole County, endorsing or negotiating change in improvements affecting Oviedo. For
the purpose of concurrency management, the City will assume the three-year
improvements from the FDOT and Seminole County work programs.
2-1.3.6 The City shall pursue coordination with Seminole County and the City of Winter
Springs to develop common policies and complementary land uses at the S.R. 434
interchange of the Seminole County Expressway.
2-1.3.7 The City shall continue to require preliminary permit approval of driveway permits
on state and county roads prior to final site plan and subdivision approval.
2-1.3.8 The City shall continue to require that County and/or State driveway permits be
submitted prior to issuing any building or site development permits.
2-1. 3.9 (CPA-95-01; Ord. No. 936; 5/15/95) The City shall incorporate the Westgate
access management plan into its Land Development Code by November. 1995.
2-1.4. OBJECTIVE: To develop long-range street plan that is consistent with the future
land use plans for Oviedo.
Measure: The transportation plan shall be a part of the future land use map series and
updated and revised accordingly.
2 - 4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Policies:
2-1.4.1 The City shall protect and maintain the small town crossroads character of the
existing town center through the limitation of street size and through the design and
development standards adopted as a part of the Downtown Development Plan.
2-1.4.2 The City shall promote commercial and multi-family development along Division
Street to relieve traffic congestion at the intersection of S.R. 426 and S.R. 434 and unify
the old and new sections of the City with a newly defined geographic center.
2-1.4.3 In accordance with the proposed FDOT improvements, the City shall allow
continued commercial development on SR. 434, south of Mitchell Hammock Road if the
adopted level of service is maintained.
2-1.5. OBJECTIVE: To keep local traffic local in character by diffusing it onto local streets,
by controlling speeds and by maintaining a complete well-connected network of local
streets.
Measure: By 1993 the City shall develop and adopt a local street system improvement
plan, identifying new local streets an connections, with funding mechanisms and
construction schedules.
Policies:
2-1.5.1 The local street system shall provide multiple possible routes for local trips.
2-1.5.2 The local circulation plan shall provide numerous small streets, not a few large
ones.
2-1.5.3 The City shall continue to enforce the access management provisions of the LOC
requiring site connections to local streets as well as collectors or arterials.
2-1.5.4 The City shall require development to provide vehicular, pedestrian, and bikeway
connections between adjacent neighborhoods, and between residential areas and
convenience shopping areas, schools and recreation areas.
2-1.5.5 Inter-connecting streets shall be designed to discourage arterial through-traffic and
neighborhood cut-through traffic.
2-1.5.6 Transportation improvement plans shall mitigate adverse impacts on established
neighborhoods and planned residential areas with various design and operational
techniques.
2 - 5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2-1.5.7 By 1993 the City shall identify canopy tree and parkway corridors and adopt
specific design criteria for transportation improvements and development in these areas.
2-1.5.8 The planned paving extensions of Pine Avenue, Lake Jessup Avenue, Division
Avenue, and Lake Charm Drive shall occur only under the following conditions:
a) The Seminole Expressway is completed through the SR. 434 interchange.
b) The traffic service on S.R. 434 between the Expressway and S.R. 426 is
operating at an unacceptable level of service as defined by the then current Traffic
Circulation Element of the Oviedo Comprehensive Plan.
c) All four improvements are completed in the same fiscal year.
2-1.5.9 By 2010 all City streets providing access to more than 10 homes and/or
businesses shall be paved.
2-1.6. OBJECTIVE: To preserve and strengthen the Old Oviedo character of the current
town center.
Measure: By 1992, the City shall create a Downtown Development District with
accompanying development plan and improvement funding program.
Policies:
2-1.6.1 The City shall constrain road width through the center of town and enhance the
pedestrian access and use.
2-1.6.2 The master plan for the Downtown Development District shall include provisions
to improve parking in the historic town center.
2-1.6.3 The City shall consult with the Downtown Revitalization Task Force and affected
property owners in developing a master plan for the Downtown Development District.
2-1.6.4 In order to preserve the existing character and minimize traffic impacts, the City
shall include in the Land Development Code specific development and design standards
for new construction and redevelopment along the north S.R. 434 approach into the
Downtown District.
These regulations shall include, but not be limited to access control, architectural
standards, rear yard parking, increased landscaping, and low intensity land uses.
2 - 6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2-1.7. OBJECTIVE: To improve and enhance non-motorized transportation alternatives.
Measure: By 1992 the City shall develop and adopt a sidewalk and bikeway plan.
Policies:
2-1.7.1 The Downtown Development District plan shall accommodate vehicular, bike, and
pedestrian traffic; but the emphasis shall be on a "walking" environment.
2-1.7.2 The City shall adopt specific street standards for the town center and other
areas where local and pedestrian traffic should dominate.
2-1.7.3 The City shall coordinate with State and County agencies to provide safe bicycle
access to the University area.
2-1.7.4 The City shall encourage pedestrian and bicycle travel through street design and
signage.
2-1.7.5 The City, whenever possible, shall require bicycle! sidewalk connections between
residential neighborhoods and between residential areas and school, shopping, and
recreation areas.
2-1.8. OBJECTIVE: To provide adequate accessibility from Oviedo residential areas to the
greater Orlando area work trip destinations.
Measure: The City shall maintain a LOS "E" or better on all major commuter routes.
Policies:
2-1.8.1 S.R. 426, S.R. 434, Mitchell Hammock Road, Lockwood Boulevard, and the
Seminole County Expressway shall be designated as commuter routes.
2-1.8.2 LOS "E" is an appropriate capacity standard for major urban area commuting, and
shall be considered an acceptable level of service for commuter routes. A development,
may, however, be required to improve the local street system in order to maintain the
overall system level of service. In other words, LOS "E" is acceptable for commuter traffic,
but a project must also make provisions for local traffic.
2 - 7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2-1.8.3 The City shall minimize the local traffic on commuter routes by developing and
improving the local street network. The improvements shall include acquiring ROW where
necessary and constructing connecting streets to provide alternative routes.
2-1.8.4 The City shall endorse the construction of the Seminole County Expressway.
2-1.8.5 The City shall maintain a position on the Technical Advisory Committee of the
Central Florida Commuter Rail Authority and support transit alternatives for the City.
2-1.8.6 The city shall pursue obtaining a position on the Seminole County Expressway
Authority.
2-1.9. OBJECTIVE: To accommodate through-traffic on well-defined corridors.
Measure: By 1996, the City shall complete construction of the southern and eastern
bypass routes. The total bypass system shall be completed by 2010.
Policies:
2-1.9.1 The City shall identify and monitor routes for all possible through-movements.
2-1.9.2 The City shall minimize local travel that is forced onto arterial streets.
2-1.9.3 The City shall improve signage to direct through-traffic and to provide designated
truck routes.
2-1.10. OBJECTIVE: To establish street design guidelines that balance vehicle, city
engineering and aesthetic needs.
Measure: By 1992 the Land Development Code shall be amended to include the
necessary standards for aesthetic enhancement and accommodations for non-motorized
traffic.
Policies:
2-1.10.1 The Land Development Code shall include typical cross-sections illustrating
appearance standards for various roadway types.
2-1.10.2 By 1995 the City shall adopt a plan for retrofitting the existing street system.
2 - 8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2-1.10.3 The City shall develop vigorous implementation and inspection procedures to
accompany the development approval process.
2-1.10.4 By 1993 the City shall adopt specific design criteria for canopy roads and
parkways.
2-1.11. OBJECTIVE: To recognize the role of transportation in defining community
character and to preserve and maintain community standards by controlling roadway size.
Measure: By 1992 the City shall adopt maximum size limitations for all streets and
roadway types within the City.
Policies:
2-1.11.1 Four-lane cross sections shall be allowed only for bypass routes and designated
commuter corridors.
2-1.11.2 For proposed development along backlogged or constrained facilities, the city
shall pursue the following alternatives to widening the facility:
a. The City shall evaluate the origin and destination of the majority of the
movements and then identify and encourage alternate routes.
b. The City shall reassess permitted land use along the corridor.
c. The City shall evaluate alternative methods of increasing capacity.
d. The City shall identify improvements to the total street network that could
provide relief.
2-1.11.3 The City shall recognize that the aesthetic quality of a facility is crucial to the
"effective" LOS and that a well-designed facility with landscaping and pedestrian
accommodations may exceed the defined LOS without the effective LOS (the LOS
perceived by the driver) becoming unacceptable.
2-1.12. OBJECTIVE: To protect the future right-of-way from encroachment by structures.
Measure: The City shall, in its Land Development Code, specify road-specific building
setbacks to protect future ROW from encroachment by structures.
2 - 9
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Policies:
2-1.12.1 The City shall include, in its Land Development Code, a listing of street
right-of-way widths as needed for future expansion needs determined in the current Traffic
Circulation Element.
2-1.12.2 The City shall maintain the current provisions of its Land Development Code that
prevent the location of buildings in proposed right-of-way.
2-1.12.3 The City shall, through its development approval process, .assure that indicated
street right-of-way is protected from encroachment by buildings.
THE FUTURE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION PLAN
The Traffic Circulation Plan for Oviedo is summarized in Map 2-1. In this plan, roads are
categorized according to their function for travel, as follows:
1. Arterial streets, which carry longer distance trips (mainly through-trips or external
trips).
2. Collector streets, which distribute traffic to or from the arterial streets, and which in
some cases provide access to fronting properties.
3. Local streets, usually the point of access to individual properties, and sometimes
serving as alternate routes to collectors and arterials.
Map 2-1 also summarizes the number of lanes in the collector and arterial street system.
Unless otherwise noted in Map 2-1, local streets are two lanes in width.
Major Features of the Future Traffic Circulation Plan
One of the primary objectives of the traffic circulation plan is to provide alternate routes for
all through-trips (trips neither beginning or ending travel in Oviedo). At present, many of
these through-trips are channeled through the SR 426/434 intersection in the center of
Oviedo.
The Traffic Circulation Plan anticipates the shift of through-trips from the SR 426/434
intersection to several bypass corridors that are more suited to such traffic
(see Map 2-2). These bypass corridors include:
*
New roads that do not have residential development (for example, Lockwood
Boulevard).
2 - 10
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
*
Existing routes (for example, Florida Avenue) that can accommodate small increase
in volume without widening or reconstruction.
*
Existing routes that have already been designed as automobile-dominated corridors
(for example, Mitchell Hammock Road).
Routing of through-trips through the SR 426/434 intersection will continue to be possible
as an alternative, and some users may continue to prefer it. This is particularly likely for
the trips between northern Seminole County and the University of Central Florida (see Map
2-3).
In combination with the dispersion of through-traffic, the Traffic Circulation Plan calls for
limiting roadway size to two or three lanes on roads within the central area of Oviedo,
specifically:
*
West Broadway Street between Mitchell Hammock Road and SR 434.
*
Central Avenue between Mitchell Hammock Road and DeLeon Street.
*
Florida Avenue between SR 434 and Van Arsdale Street.
*
Geneva Road between East Broadway Street and Florida Avenue.
*
East Broadway Street between Central Avenue and Lockwood Boulevard.
These roads are limited to a two-lane or three-lane width because:
1. With the development of the bypass network (see Map 2-2), these roads will no
longer be the sole route for through-trips.
2. The two-lane or three-lane width is adequate to serve the future development in
their vicinity, as projected by the Oviedo lane use plan.
3. A well-connected network of local streets in the central area of Oviedo provides
alternate routes for most local trips.
4. The limitation of these roadways to a two-lane or three-lane width is important in
preserving the traditional small-town character of the central part of Oviedo.
An important feature of the Traffic Circulation Plan is the development of a new center
along Division Street north of Mitchell Hammock Road. This development is intended to
be an "urban village" type of design. Traffic circulation features that are typical of this type
of development include a well-connected network of local streets, generally two lanes in
2 - 11
4 A
J L- Functional Classification
ART = ARTERIAL
MA = MINOR ARTERIAL
MaC = MAJOR COLLECTOR
Number MIC = MINOR COLLECTOR
of Lanes C = COLLECTOR
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
I
.M.i :'!;I !;':I~lt(; t-llJ
I'
\\
\\~\
\ 'i~ \
\
\~ ,
\~\
~
II
, ''ti II
',.11.
Illl
II ..
II:
II
"
II
:-/1
. ~~1'
, "I'
:f/
';:;/1
2 MiC
2 MiC
CANO PY ROAD
n r.r~IO'"
.t;f:
-
"$l~ 4)U 4 MA .".,." "'" j
I
,
MAP 2.1
2A
CITY OF OV I EDO
TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ELEMENT
YEAR 2010 TRAFFIC
CIRCULATION PLAN
4A
WilliNGHAM
RD.
.'/'1
I
.'
I
_ _ ._.___ _._ .. J
,
I
_J
I
1--0' .
I. I !
I~
I~ -. '
I~
I::
_ _ ------J 0
(J
,:
.,~..
,
l --l _n
- ,
__I
.... ';;",:
'," .'
',:
I
n
1'\) \
Ln~_J
~:-
'~.. .
CH.\H.1AN RD.
4 MA
LEGEND
/!
(. ~
"',.-. ....:
. m'r
(*) In lieu:of the connector shown
from S.R. f26 to. Red Bug Lake Road
via Winter !Springs Blvd., an alternative ,
bridge conine~ting from S.R. ~_26 over tht1
Seminole Greeneway through the
Oviedo Crossing D.R.I. may. OCcur.
\.
-"'. :~
'v
I
\,
"
1,1..\'1'11";
1.01'" I.
kua IL..t
\ "of.II'
~
_...J~
;; !>(,O :'.":0 :"i!;1)
".eMf. IU fEEl
2-12
FIGURE B-1
-
I\)
.
.....
w
-
EXPRESSWAY,
RED BUG RD.
IEXPYI
-
-
-
?
-
'0 /
-----~y~~--------
," '" '''.'w""'" L""",,,,,,,
/-- ---------- - ----------------
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
II:
-,'
.,
,.
::1' ,:11' 1\
jl,\t.\'.H)(';..,
......--EXPY-GEN
SC-CHU
UNIV-GEN
"
o
c,
o
"
FUTURE ROUTING OF .THROUGH TRAFFIC
~:::;...--
SC-UNIV
EXPY -UNIV..../
~EXPY-GEN
EXPY-CHU
UNIV -CHU
UNIV -GEN
UNIVERSTY
(UNIV)
-
-
CHULUOTA
(CHUl
MAP 2-2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
width, with on-street parking. Off-street parking is usually located behind commercial
buildings; and most commercial buildings are located close to the curb line. A goal of this
type of urban village is to create a "park-once" pedestrian atmosphere, in which visitors can
accomplish a number of different travel purposes with a single vehicle-trip (for example,
shopping, personal business, eating).
Performance of the Future Traffic Circulation Plan
Under year 2010 conditions with the planned traffic circulation system in place (see Table
2-3), 69 percent of the travel on the major street system (arterial and collector streets) will
be at LOS "C" or better (essentially a free-flow condition). In 2010, twenty percent of all
travel will be at LOS "D", a level generally accepted for suburban areas. In the year 2010,
only 11 percent of all travel on the major street system in Oviedo will be at LOS "E" or "F".
The proportion of travel at LOS "E" or "F" is substantially less than that projected to occur
in 1995 with committed improvement s (28 percent LOS "E"E or "F") and only one-fifth of
that projected to occur in the year 2010 with committed improvements (51 percent at LOS
"E" or "F").
For the year 2010 with the planned improvement in place, LOS "E" or "F" will occur on
three sections of roadway: (1) West Broadway between Mitchell Hammock Road and
Winter Springs Boulevard, (2) Central Avenue south of the SR 434 Bypass and (3)
Lockwood Boulevard between Mitchell Hammock Road and East Broadway.
The traffic on West Broadway between Mitchell Hammock Road and Winter Springs
Boulevard reflects the continued growth of through-traffic between Red Bug Lake
Road/Expressway interchange area and Winter Springs Boulevard. This element of
through-traffic has no other route available. A new north-south connector between Red
Bug L.ake Road and Tuskawilla Road would remove this element of through-traffic from
Oviedo.
The Seminole County Expressway will provide an alternate route for much of the traffic on
Central Avenue south of the 434 By-pass.
For Lockwood Boulevard, the projected LOS "F" condition could be remedied by
intersection improvements (most likely turning lanes) at Broadway and/or Mitchell
Hammock Road.
2 - 14
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The Improvement Program
Map 2-3 summarizes the program of improvement needed to realize the Future Traffic
Circulation Plan. The individual elements of the improvement program are listed in further
detail in Table 2-1.
A major committed element in the proposed improvement program is the extension of
Lockwood Boulevard between CR 419 and CR 426, a distance of 2.5 miles. This
improvement, requiring right-of-way purchase and new construction, will serve as an
important part of the bypass system that will divert traffic from the SR 426/434 intersection
in the center of Oviedo.
CONSISTENCY WITH OTHER LOCAL AND REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANS
The Oviedo Traffic Circulation Element is consistent with the traffic circulations plans of
other nearby or encompassing agencies: for example, Florida Department of
Transportation, Seminole County, the Seminole County Expressway Authority, and the
East Central Florida Regional Planning Council.
In general, this element contains improvement that surpass those in other plans. In no
instance, however, do these improvements conflict with the long-range plans of other
agencies.
Florida Department of Transportation {FOOT) Plan
FOOT has programmed or planned three projects directly affecting circulation in or near
Oviedo:
*
Widening of SR 434 west of the proposed Seminole County Expressway
Interchange.
*
Widening of SR 434 south of Mitchell Hammock Road
*
Construction of the SR 434 Bypass, a section of arterial highway extending between
the vicinity of the SR 426/west Mitchell Hammock Road intersection and SR 434
north of Chapman Road.
All of these proposed improvements are consistent with the Oviedo Traffic Circulation
Element. The SR 434 Bypass removed the major component of through-traffic in Oviedo,
which is a key part of the Future Traffic Circulation Plan, and which is consistent with the
City's efforts to remove all other components of through-traffic. Widening of SR 434 south
of the SR 434 Bypass is a necessary complement to the SR 434 Bypass.
2 - 15
:1
I
I
.1
:1
I
r-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FLORIDA AVENUE
FLORIDA AVENUE
(BRIDGE)
s",..rOHO OVIEI)) RD
CITY OF OVIEDO
TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ELEMENT
I'
I
I
o
o
D /LOCKWOOD
,0 (NORTH)
,0
.; 0
o
o
o
'Q
TRAFFIC CIRCULATION
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
BLVD.
I MAP 2.3
\-VllUiJGH4fJ RD.
.' !
1:
!~
"g
"
,
\
J
,
I---d',',,
l.~ ". ..
,'" ,
"
Of'> ,,: '~
S.R. 434~('U
BYPASS ~~
434 I 426 ~
INTERSECTION
L
,-,
if
,
\.
.,..........~l
-' ;
\'-"0
;;HApty1At'J RD
(1) Oviedo Crossing Terrace
(2) Westgate Road
D'
~i
,""
'-'I
0,
~,
i
,~
f-'< - 0
,/'1' :Y-
"~""",__, .(-*t) In lieu of the connector show~~.L::-~
from S.R. 426 to' Red Bug Lake Road \ """
via Winter Springs Blvd., an alternative \. ""',
bridge connecting from S.R. 426 over the \ .\
Seminole Greeneway through the "
C ' '
Oviedo rossing D.R.I. may occur. '\..../
a
LOCKWOOD BLVD.
(SOUTH)
~
..--J~
. " '1 0'). I ~ I . '., I~.
'.CAU. Il'~ FfET
i, 1.l.y,',I.';";
hJ IU III H
\ '..1 !'
2-16
FIGURE B-3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 2-1
SUMMARY OF IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
Responsible Estimated
Improvement Description Agency Cost Status
1990 - 1996
Lockwood Blvd. (south) Build new arterial highway under construction
1.8 miles Little Creek 272 plan review
Lockwood Blvd. (north) Build new arterial highway Seminole County\ 1560 completed 1994
2.4 miles Oviedo. Estes Trust
Artesia Street Pave and extend (.5 miles)
S.R. 434 to Lake Jesup Ave. City of Oviedo 285 completed 1991
Division St. (south) build 2.3-lane road. from Mitchell City of Oviedol 350 ROW acquired 1993
Hammock Rd. to Doctors Drive Developer
1996 - 2010
Florida Ave. Connect directly to S.R. 434 Joint City of Oviedo\ 500
.3 miles. Replace bridge. Seminole County
S.R. 434 Bypass Build new arterial road FOOT 2000
.8 to 1.2 miles)
S.R. 434 Widen to 4-lanes, from Mitchell FOOT 2500
Hammock Rd. to county line
(3.0 miles)
Lake Jesup Ave.\Shangri-La pave City of Oviedo 900
Lake Charm Drive
Division Ave.
Division Ave. (north) build from Doctors Drive to CR 419 City of Oviedo 700 ROW acquired
in 1994/95
W. Mitchell Hammock Rd. Make SR 426- W. Mitchell FOOT 350
Hammock Rd. into through move-
ment
Pine Avenue Extend local street (Artesia to City\Developer 250
S.R. 434)
W. Mitchell Hammock Rd. Reconstruct to 6-lanes from City\Developer nla
(*) S.R. 434 to S.R. 426
S.R. 426 Reconstruct to 4-lanes from FOOT
(*) Seminole Expressway to Mitchell
Hammock Rd.
Westgate Connector Construct 2-lane road from City\Developer
(*) Winter Sprigns Blvd. to Red Bug
Lake Road
Oveido Crossing Connector Four-lane road from S.R. 426 to Developer
(*) Red Bug Lake Road
(*) Amended May 15, 1995; Amendment 95-1; Ord. 936.
2-17
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Seminole County Plans
The Seminole County Year 2010 Impact Fee Network Plan includes SIX highway
improvements in or near Oviedo:
*
Widening of Mitchell Hammock Road to four lanes.
*
Widening of Lockwood Boulevard from McCullough Road to CR 419.
*
Construction of the ~R 434 Bypass, between the SR 426/Mitchell Hammock Road
intersection and Central Avenue.
*
Widening of SR 434 to four lanes, south of the SR 434 Bypass.
*
Widening of Chapman Road to four lanes, between SR 426 and SR 434.
*
Widening of CR 419 to four lanes.
All of these improvements are consistent with the Oviedo Traffic Circulation Element. Two
of the improvements (widening of Mitchell Hammock Road and extension of Lockwood
Boulevard) are. either in operation or under construction. Two other improvements -- the
SR 434 Bypass and widening of SR 434 south of the SR 434 Bypass -- are identical to
improvements in the Oviedo traffic Circulation Element. The final two improvements --
widening SR 426 and Chapman road - are outside Oviedo, but closely support the goals
and objectives of the City's Traffic Circulation element. the widening of Chapman Road
to four lanes will furnish an attractive alternative to the use of West Mitchell Hammock
Road for some traffic, thereby relieving traffic volumes at the SR 426/West Mitchell
Hammock Road intersection. The widening of SR 426 south of West Mitchell Hammock
Road will also tend to reduce traffic volumes at the SR 426/West Mitchell Hammock Road
area, by making SR 426 more attractive as an alternate route to and from the southwest.
Seminole County Expressway Authority
The Seminole County Expressway, from its present terminus at SR 426 to Lake Mary
Boulevard, is projected to open in 1995. Two interchanges on this section -- at relocated
Red Bug Lake road and at SR 434 north of Oviedo - will have a significant impact on traffic
within the City.
The Seminole County Expressway and its planned interchanges are a key part of the
City's Traffic Circulation Element. The expressway will provide an alternate route for the
largest component of through-traffic projected to pass through the City (the north-south
'movement on SR 434).
2 - 18
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
I
I
I
I
-I
I
I
East Central Florida Regional Planning Council
The Year 2005 Financially Feasible Plan for the East Central Florida Regional Planning
Council (ECFRPC) includes projects that are affordable by the Year 2005, given available
funding sources. The only such project in the vicinity of Oviedo is the Seminole County
Expressway.
The ECFRPC Year 2005 Needs Plan is a statement of improvements that are needed by
the Year 2005, regardless of the availability of funding. Three such projects directly affect
Oviedo:
*
The Seminole County Expressway
*
Widening of SR 434 south of the SR 434 Bypass.
*
The SR 434 Bypass, extending from Central Avenue near Chapman Road to the
SR 434/Seminole County Expressway interchange north of Oviedo.
Two of these improvements -- the Seminole County Expressway and the widening of SR
434 south of the SR 434 Bypass -- are identical to improvements identified in the Oviedo
Traffic Circulation Element. The SR 434 Bypass, as described in the ECFRPC Year 2005
Needs Plan, is more extensive than the SR 434 By pass, as described in the Oviedo traffic
Circulation Element (and as currently planned by FDOT). The City and FDOT plans call
for a bypass that extends only between Central Avenue near Chapman Road to the vicinity
of the SR 426/Mitchell Hammock Road intersection. Under the City/FDOT concept, bypass
traffic would use a combination of the Seminole County Expressway and the new SR 434
Bypass to avoid travel through the center of Oviedo.
(TRAFFIC)
2 - 19
----~--~-~------~~-
TABLE 2.2
SUMMARY OF YEAR 1996 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
N
I
N
o
Road Type Dally 2010 Traffic
Street and Segment length Lanes Capacity 2010 Percent of
(miles) LOS E LOS Total VMT
Jurisdiction functional (vehicles) Average Peak-HourI
Classification Daily Peak-Direction
. .
Central Ave. (SR 434)
Chapman Rd. - SR 434 Bypass 0.2 FOOT Minor Arterial 2 16,100 23,800 1,280 F 2
SR 434 Bypass - Alafaya Woods Blvd. 0.4 FOOT Minor Arterial 2 16,100 23,800 1,280 F 3
Alafaya Woods Blvd. - Mitchell Ham"1ock Rd. 0.4 FOOT Minor Arterial 2 16,100 23,800 1,280 F 3
Mitchell Hammock Rd. - Broadway St. 1.0 FOOT Minor Arterial 2 16,100 16,200 870 E 6
Broadway St. - De Leon St. 1.3 FOOT Minor Arterial 2 16,100 13,200 710 C 6
De Leon St. - City Limit 0.8 FOOT Minor Arterial 2 16,100 12,700 680 B 4
W. Broadway St. (SR 426)
Mitchell Hammock Rd. - Winter Springs Blvd. 0.9 FDOT Minor Arterial 2 16,100 20,500 1,100 F 6
Winter Springs Blvd.. Lake Jesup Dr. 0.6 FDOT Minor Arterial 2 16,100 22,500 1,210 F 6
Lake Jesup Dr. - Central Ave. 0.3 FOOT Minor Arterial 2 16,100 22,500 1,210 F 2
Geneva Rd. (CR 426)
E. Broadway St. . Reed Rd. 1.2 County Major Collector 2 16,100 8,000 430 A 3
Reed Rd. . City Limit 0.2 County Major Collector 2 16,100 8,000 430 A 1
E. Broadway St. (CR 419) Major Collector A'-- -- 1 --
Central Ave. . Division St. 0.2 County 2 16,100 11,700 630
Division St. . Lockwood Blvd. 1.9 County Major Collector 2 16,100 11,200 600 A 7
Lockwood Blvd. . City Limits 2.9 County Major Collector 2 16,100 9,500 510 A 9
Mitchell Hammock Blvd.
W. Broadway St. - Central Ave. 1.1 City Arterial 4 36,700 23,700 1,270 A 9
Central Ave. . Alafaya Woods Blvd. 1.2 City Arterial 4 36,700 32,800 1,760 C 14
Alafaya Woods. Blvd. - Lockwood Blvd. 0.6 City Arterial 4 36,700 17,900 960 A 4
Lockwood Blvd.
City Limit. Mitchell Hammock Rd. 1.6 City Arterial 4 25,900 9,100 490 A 5
Mitcheoll Hammock Rd. - E. Broadway St. 0.2 City Arterial 4 39,600 11,200 600 A 1
"\ Florida Ave.
De Leon St. . Van Arsdale Rd. 2.5 City Minor Collector 2 16,100 2,800 150 C 2
LOS: Level-ol-Service. as de1ined by FOOT "Generalized GUIdelines" TraffiC Volumes Irom 1989 counts. plus growth from approved development.
Source: Glattlng Lopez Kercher Anglin. Inc.
. "".- -
-------'---~--)--,--
Road Type Dally 2010 Traffic
Street and Segment Length Lanes Capacity 2010 Percent of
(miles) LOSE LOS Total VMT
Jurisdiction functional (vehicles) Average Peak-HourI
Classification Dally Peak-Direction
Alafaya Woods Blvd. 34,000
Central Ave. - Mitchell Hammock Rd. 2.4 City Coli ector 4 3,500 190 C 3
Lake Jesup Dr.
Mitchell Hammock Rd. . W. Broadway St. 1.0 City Collector 2 16,100 2,800 150 C 1
W. Broadway 51. . Artesia St. 1.0 City Local 2 12,900 3,500 190 C 1
. .
Artesia St. . Florida Ave. 0.4 City Local 2 12,900 600 30 C 0
Division St.
Alexandria Blvd. . E. Broadway S1. .. City Collector -- 16,100 .. n n n
E, Broadway 51. - Artesia St. 1.0 City Local 2 12,900 2,200 120 C 1
Artesia 51. - Florida Ave. 0.5 City Local 2 12,900 600 30 C 0
Artesia St. . Florida Ave. 0.5 City Local 2 12,900 600 30 C 0
SUMMARY OF YEAR 1996TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
N
I
N
~
LOS: Level-of-Servlce, as defmed by FDOT "Generalized Guidelines" TraffIC Volumes from 1989 counts, plus growth from approved development.
Source: Glatting Lopez Kercher Anglin. Inc.
. ~._\-..-. ...:..-
- .. ... - ... - - ... - _:_ _1". _
N
I
N
N
TABLE 2.3
.
SUMMARY OF YEAR 2010 CONDITIONS WITH PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS
Road Type 2010 Traffic
Length Dally 2010 Percent of
Street and Segment (miles) Lanes Capacity LOS Total VMT
Jurisdiction Functional (LOS "'E" Vehicles) Average Peak-HourI
Classification Daily Peak-Direction
Central Ave. (SR 434)
Chapman Rd. - 5R 434 Bypass 0.2 FOOT Minor Arterial 4 36,700 34,300 1,840 E 1
5R 434 Bypass - Alafaya Woods Blvd. 0.4 FOOT Minor Arterial 4 34,000 15,800 850 A 1
Alafaya Woods Blvd. - Mitchell Hammock Rd. 0.4 FOOT Minor Arterial 4 34,000 15,800 850 A 1
Mitchell Hammock Rd. - Broadway St. 1.0 FOOT Minor Arterial 2 16,100 12,900 690 B 3
Broadway St. - De Leon 5t. 1.3 FOOT Minor Arterial 2 16,100 9,200 490 A 2
De Leon St. - City Limit 0.8 FOOT Minor Arterial 4 34,000 32,200 1,730 0 5
W. Broadway St. (SR 426)
Mitchell Hammock Rd. - Winter Springs Blvd. 0.9 FOOT Minor Arterial 2 16,100 19,200 1,030 F 3
Winter Springs Blvd. - Lake Jesup Dr. 0.8 FOOT Minor Arterial 2 16,100 15,400 830 0 2
Lake Jesup Dr. - Central Ave. 0.3 FDOT Minor Arterial 2 16,100 15,400 830 0 1
Geneva Rd. (CR 426)
E. Broadway St. - Reed Rd. 1.2 County Major Collector 2 16,100 7,200 390 A 2
Reed Rd. - City Limit 0.2 County Major Collector 2 16,100 6,900 370 A --
E. Broadway St. (CR 419)
Central Ave. - Division St. 0.2 County Major Collector 2 16,100 14,000 750 B 1
Division St. - Lockwood Blvd. 1.9 Cou nty Major Collector 2 16,100 8,700 470 A 3
Lockwood Blvd. - City Limits 2.9 Cou nty Major Collector 4 34,000 30,200 1,620 A 16
Mitchell Hammock Blvd.
W. Broadway St. - Central Ave. 1.1 City Arterial 4 36,700 38,500 2,070 A 8
Central Ave. - Alafaya Woods Blvd. 1.2 City Arterial 4 36,700 35,300 1,890 D 8
Alafaya Woods. Blvd. . Lockwood Blvd. 0.6 City Arterial 4 36,700 35,300 1,890 0 4
Lockwood Blvd.
City Limit. Mitchell Hammock Rd. 1.6 City Arterial 4 36,700 25,900 1,390 A 8
Mitchell H~mock Rd. - E. Broadway St. 0.2 City Arterial 4 36,700 39,600 2,130 .. F .. . .. 2
E. BroadwayBlvd. - Geneva Rd. 1.5 County Minor Collector 4 36,700 17,500 940 A 5
..
LOS: Level.of-SerVlce. as def,ned by FOOT -Generalized GUidelines TraffiC Volumes from 1989 counts. plus growth from approved development.
Source: Glatt.ng Lopez Kercher Anglin,lne.
- _. - - -' - - .. - ... .... .,'" -:-, .. ..' .. "..
N
I
N
v.>
Road Type 2010 Traffic
Street and Segment Length Dally 2010 Percent of
(miles) Lanes Ca pa city LOS Total VMT
Jurisdiction Functional (LOS 'T' Vehicles) Average Peak-HourI
Classification Daily peak.Direction
Florida Ave.
De Leon St. . Van Arsdale Rd. 2.5 City Minor Collector 2 16,100 15,400 830 C 7
Alafaya Woods Blvd.
Central Ave. - Mitchell Hammock Rd. 2.4 City Coli ector 4 34,000 8,000 430 A 4
Lake Jesup Dr.
Mitchell Hammock Rd. . W. Broadway St. 1.0 City Coli ector 2 16,100 6,000 320 C 1
W. Broadway St. - Artesia St. 1.0 City Local 2 12,900 7,500 400 C 1
Artesia St. - Florida Ave. 0.4 City Local 2 12,900 7,500 400 C 1
Division St.
Alexandria Blvd. . E. Broadway St. 1.3 City Coli ector 2 16,100 5,000 270 C 1
E. Broadway St. - Artesia St. 1.0 City Local 2 12,900 6,000 320 C 1
Artesia St. - Florida Ave. 0.5 City Local 2 12,000 5,000 270 C 0
SR 434 Bypass Minor Arterial
Broadway St. . Central Ave. 1.4 FOOT 4 34,000 30,500 1,640 B 8
LOS: Level-of-Service, as defined by FOOT "Generalized Guidelines" Traffic Volumes from 1989 counts. plus growth from approved development.
SUMMARY OF YEAR 2010 CONDITIONS WITH PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS
Source: Glatting Lopez Kercher Anglin,lnc.
I
I
I
I
'I
J
I
I
I
I
~I
II
il
II
II
II
II
II
II
HOUSING
I
I
I
.1.
I
I,
I
.1.
I
I,
I
I
I
.1
J
I
,J
I
I
HOUSING
GOALS. OBJECTIVES. AND POLICIES
INTRODUCTION: The Housing Element focuses on providing and maintaining an
adequate, fair, and affordable housing supply for the projected population. The
designation and protection of historically significant housing is also included in this
element.
3-1 GOAL: TO ENSURE THE PROVISION OF ADEQUATE, AFFORDABLE, AND SAFE
HOUSING FOR THE EXISTING AND FUTURE RESIDENTS OF THE CITY OF
OVIEDO.
3-1.1 OBJECTIVE: To ensure that"affordable" housing is available within the City of
Oviedo by maintaining existing housing units and encouraging multi-family development.
Measure:
Owner Units: The median annual household income for the City shall meet or exceed the
"qualifying income" for the median priced single family home within the City.
Rental Units: The median monthly rent shall not exceed 30% of the median monthly
income.
The percentage of multi-family units shall increase from the present 13% to 15% in 1996
and to 25% in 2010.
Policies:
3-1.1.1 "Affordable" shall mean that monthly mortgage payments or rents do not exceed
30 percent of the median annual household income.
3-1.1.2 "Qualifying income" shall be the annual household income needed to qualify for
a mortgage(under prevailing financing terms) assuming that 30% of the annual income
is the housing expenditure.
3-1.1.3 The City shall assess the affordability of its housing stock every five years using
median incomes and prices for Seminole County if City figures are not available.
3 - 1
I
I
),
,I
I
I,
'I'
,I
I
I
I
I'
,I'
I:
I
I
I
I
I
3-1.1.4 The City shall monitor existing residential neighborhoods and continue to pursue
code enforcement measures to ensure that existing housing units remain viable housing
options.
3-1.1.5 The City shall offer a fast-track permit approval process to private and
not-for-profit builders of low and moderate income housing.
3-1.1.6 The City shall designate appropriate sites for multi-family development so that
rental options remain available.
3-1.1.7 The City shall provide a fast-track permitting process (CUP in 60 days;
Construction Level II in 45 days) for low income housing providers and shall approve
certain variances to support the provision of low income housing.
3-1.1.8 The City shall evaluate non-residential projects for their impacts on affordable
housing and shall require mitigation of impacts when necessary.
3-1.2. OBJECTIVE: To improve substandard housing conditions.
Measure: The City shall pursue Code Enforcement procedures to ensure that no more
than 2% of the City's housing units remain or become "substandard", as defined in Policy
2.1.
Policies:
3-1-2.1 A substandard housing unit shall be a dwelling unit that is considered to be either
deteriorated or dilapidated. (A deteriorated unit has one or more intermediate defects, but
is considered repairable. A dilapidated unit has one or more critical defects and is
considered to be beyond repair.)
3-1-2.2 The City shall maintain an inventory of substandard housing units which will be
assessed annually.
3-1.2.3 The City shall strictly enforce existing building codes.
3-1.2.4 The City shall continue to pursue Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
and other funds to rehabilitate deteriorating housing structures.
3-1.2.5 The City shall monitor dilapidated housing structures to pursue condemnation
prior to new occupancy.
3-1-2.6 The City shall continue its policy of condemning and demolishing vacant
dilapidated housing structures.
3 - 2
I:
'I
I,
I.
I'
\1,
I
.1
I
,I
I
I
I.
I
J
'I'
I
I.
I
3-1.2.7 The City shall assist owners and/or residents of occupied residential units in
upgrading the structure by providing technical and funding information.
3-1.3. OBJECTIVE: To ensure the provision of a variety of housing types to meet the
various and special needs of the anticipated population.
Measure: The City shall maintain an inventory of existing housing types, including single
family, multi-family, and mobile homes,
Policies:
3-1.3.1 Group homes and foster care facilities shall be permitted in accordance with the
site location criteria contained in F.S.419.001.
3-1.3.2 The City shall continue to enforce its Fair Housing Code and prohibit
discrimination in housing.
3-1.3.3 In accordance with the adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), the City shall
provide urban services to High Density Residential areas to encourage multi-family
development in appropriate locations.
3-1.3.4 The City shall ensure that existing low and moderate income areas are maintained
through Code Enforcement and zoning.
3-1.3.5 The Future Land Use Map shall include areas designated for high density
development, in accordance with the multi-family land use requirements to ensure the
availability of adequate sites for low and moderate income family housing.
3-1.3.6 Every five years the City shall evaluate the need for a housing implementation
program.
3-1.3.7 Mobile homes shall be permitted in accordance with the site location criteria
contained in F.S. 320.8285(5) and 553.38(2).
3-1.3.8 The City shall support special needs housing by permitting such housing in all
residential zones and approving variances where needed to support the special needs of
the household.
3 - 3
,I
I
J
I
.,
I
I
I
.,
.1
I
I
I
I
.1.
I
I
I
'I
3-1.4. OBJECTIVE: Amended 7-19-93. To ensure the identification, conservation, and
rehabilitation of historically significant housing through implementation of the following
policies.
Measure: By 1992, the City shall adopt an historic preservation ordinance which 1)
provides for the identification, conservation, and rehabilitation of historically significant
housing, and 2) regulates the demolition and alteration of historically significant housing.
Policies:
3-1.4.1 The City shall maintain an inventory of historically significant housing consistent
with criteria established in Policy 6.1 of the Future Land Use Element.
3-1.4.2 The City shall provide technical assistance to private and non-profit groups for the
preservation of historically significant housing.
3-1.4.3 Historically significant housing included in the City's official inventory shall be
illustrated on the FLUM and the official zoning map.
3-1.4.4 The City shall review all proposed housing demolitions for historical significance.
Any demolition of a designated historic site must be consistent with Policy 6.6 of the Future
Land Use Element.
3-1.4.5 Funding Assistance for Historic Preservation. The City shall pursue grant funds
from the Grants and Education Section of the Bureau of Historic Preservation, Florida
Dept. of State, to conduct historic preservation activities and studies.
3-1.4.6 The City shall request that the Oviedo Historical Society recommend locally
significant houses to be included in the official listing of historical resources, utilizing
identification criteria established in Policy 6.1 of the Future Land Use Element.
3-1.4.7 Rehabilitation of Historic Structures. Rehabilitation, alteration or modification of
a designated historic site shall conform to guidelines set forth in the U.S. Secretary of the
Interior's "Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic
Buildings".
3-1.5. OBJECTIVE: To provide adequate infrastructure to existing and future residential
areas.
Measure: By 1992, the City will adopt a specific plan to provide adequate infrastructure
to"substandard residential areas".
3 - 4
I'
I
,I,
I.
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I,
I
\ '
,I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
Policies:
3-1.5.1 "Substandard residential areas" shall be areas that lack one or more of the
following infrastructure components: paved streets, City supplied potable water, sanitary
sewer or properly functioning on-site sanitary sewer disposal systems.
3-1.5.2 The infrastructure improvement plan shall include a variety of funding mechanism
options.
3-1.5.3 Improvements to substandard residential areas shall not cause unreasonable
financial burden to low and moderate income households.
3-1.5.4 The City shall continue to enforce the Land Development Code requiring all new
development to provide infrastructure for public facilities and services.
3-1.5.5 The City shall continue to enforce the Land Development provision requiring any
substantial land use change (as defined in the LDC) to meet current development
standards.
3-1.5.6 The City shall continue to pursue CDBG funding for improvements in the City's
target low income areas (Avenue B and Johnson Hill).
3-1.6. OBJECTIVE: To ensure that enough housing is available for the existing and future
population by designating at least 125% more land area for residential development than
is required to meet the anticipated population acreage demands.
Measure: The City shall assess its housing stock every five years using accepted
population estimates and projections, housing data, and the Short Range Future Land Use
Map to ensure that adequate housing is available.
Policies:
3-1.6.1 The City shall annually assess the' accuracy of its population projections and
evaluate the Short-Range Land Use Plan to ensure that there is enough residentially
designated land to accommodate 125% of the anticipated housing needs.
3-1.6.2 The City shall require that any project involving the displacement of existing
households submit a plan for providing relocation housing. Said plan must be approved
by City Council.
HOUSING
3 - 5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PUBLIC UTILITIES
= Wastewater
m Solid Waste
'" Drainage & Natural Groundwater
Recharge
~ Potable Water
I
I
I
I
,
I.
I
I
I'
,a
I
I
I
I
,I
I
I
I
I
WASTEWA TER
GOALS. OBJECTIVES. AND POLICIES
INTRODUCTION: The City is currently evaluating the following options for providing
central sewer service in the City: 1) increasing the Iron Bridge wholesale capacity from
Seminole County and expanding the collection system; 2) acquiring Alafaya Woods
Treatment Facility; 3) constructing a City-owned and operated facility for treatment and
disposal. The City is committed to providing service, but more evaluation is needed in
order to select an option or combination of options. A task force has been selected and
a decision will be made prior to July 1, 1992.
4-1 GOAL: TO PROVIDE COST EFFECTIVE ENVIRONMENTALLY ACCEPTABLE
WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES TO SERVE THE EXISTING AND FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY.
4-1-1 OBJECTIVE: To minimize any adverse environmental impact of wastewater
treatment systems.
Measure: By 1992 the Land Development Code shall be revised to include regulations for
the use, location, density, and maintenance of individual wastewater treatment systems
and for the use, design, construction, ownership, and operation of package treatment
plants.
Policies:
4-1.1.1 The City shall require that all development within 2000' of the Econlockhatchee
R.iver utilize a central sewer collection and treatment system.
4-1.1.2 The City shall continue to monitor occupational licenses, zoning, and subdivision
requests to regulate the use of individual wastewater treatment systems for industrial uses.
4-1.1.3 The City shall educate the public regarding the use and maintenance of septic
tanks.
4-1.1.4 The City shall specify minimum lot sizes consistent with Chapter 10D-6 of the
Florida Administrative Code for the use of septic tanks in residential areas of the City
where centralized sewer service is not yet available, and the soils do not have severe
limitations for septic tank use.
4-1.1.5 Whenever possible, top priority shall be given to providing central sewer service
4-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"
I,
I
I
I
I
,I
I'
I
I
I
to areas where there are serious threats to the public health, safety, and welfare.
4-1.1.6 The City shall require a minimum lot size of one acre for new residential
development in areas where soils have severe limitations for septic tank usage and
centralized sewer is not yet available.
4-1.1.7 All new residential development in areas with severe soil limitations for septic
tanks, and all non-residential development shall be required to provide or to connect to a
central sewer service system. Temporary sanitary sewer service consistent with the other
objectives and policies of this element may be permitted on an interim basis.
4-1.1.8 Individual and package wastewater treatment systems shall be prohibited in
wetlands, floodplains, and buffer areas surrounding surface water bodies.
4-1-1.9 Septic tanks shall be allowed in Conservation land use areas only when necessary
for facilities required to oversee said conservation area.
4-1.1.10 The following soil types shall be considered to have severe limitations for septic
tank usage:
1) Adamsville - Sparr Fine Sands
2) Arents
3) Basinger and Delray Fine Sands
4) Basinger, Samusal & Hontoon Fine Sands
5) Basinger & Smyrna Fine Sands
6) Canova and Terra Ceia Mucks
7) Eaugalie & Immokalee Fine Sands
8) Immokalee Sand
9) Brighton, Samsual & Sanibel Muck
10) Malabar Fine Sand
11) Myakka & Eaugalie Fine Sands
12) Pineda Fine Sand
13) Pomello Fine Sand
14) Pompano Fine Sand
15) St. Johns and Eaugalie Fine Sands
4-1.2 OBJECTIVE: To correct deficiencies, maximize the use of existing facilities, and
minimize the City's cost in providing adequate service for wastewater treatment and
collection.
4-2
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I
I
I
Measure: By 1992 the City shall adopt user fees and capital recovery fees that will
adequately finance system improvements and operation.
Policies:
4-1.2.1 Package treatment plants and collection systems shall be designed for future
connection to a central system and donated free of charge to the City upon request.
4-1.2.2 All new development shall install and dedicate to the city dry sewer lines in
accordance with the approved Master Plan if sewer service is not currently available and
City Council approves a temporary treatment option.
4-1.2.3 (CPA-95-1, Ord. No. 936; 5/15/95) All new wastewater collection, pumping and
transmission, treatment, and disposal facilities shall be dedicated to the City unless an
interlocal agreement or development agreement otherwise establishes a maintenance
authority..
4-1.2.4 New development shall fund the cost of required capacity expansions, and/or
extension of central sewer lines.
4-1.2.5 The City shall pursue Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds and
other available sources to extend central sewer service to low and moderate income areas.
4-1.2.6 The City shall amend its mandatory connection ordinance to address package
treatment plants and insure the conversion of existing land uses from septic tanks and
package plants to central systems as the system in expanded.
4-1.2.7 The City shall extend central sanitary sewer service in the following order of
priority:
a. Service to existing areas that present an immediate threat to public health or safety
or produce serious pollution problems.
b. Maintenance or expansion of existing wastewater systems to correct deficiencies
and/or meet adopted level of service standards.
c. Service to new development areas outside the initial service area.
4-1.2.8 The City shall annually assess the operation of areas serviced by septic tanks and
package plants to determine if there are any new deficiencies.
4-3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4-1.2.9 The City shall monitor all City-owned facilities to ensure the adequacy of effluent
treatment and odor control.
4-1.2.10 The City shall continue to notify the Seminole County Health Department of any
health code violations regarding the use of septic tanks.
4-1.3 OBJECTIVE: To provide and maintain facilities with sufficient capacity to treat and
dispose of the present and projected wastewater volumes.
Measure: The City shall adopt the following level of service for areas with a central
collection system (I, II, & III).
1) 300 gallons/day/Equivalent Residential Connection.
2) Peak facility capacity shall be maintained at a minimum of two times the permitted
capacity.
3) Adherence to all rules and requirements of Florida Department of Environmental
Regulation.
Policies:
4-1.3.1 Whenever possible, top priority shall be given to providing central sewer service
to areas where there are serious threats to the public health, safety, and welfare.
4-1.3.2 The City shall evaluate the purchase of Alafaya Utilities to augment system
capacity, upgrade service and increase cost effectiveness.
4-1.3.3 System improvements and expansions shall be constructed in accordance with the
Master Plan.
4-1.3.4 Land use intensities on the Short and Long-Range Land Use Plans shall reflect
the availability of central sewer service. Only low density residential uses shall be
permitted in areas without central wastewater service or an environmentally acceptable
temporary alternative.
4-1.3.5 The City shall annually evaluate available capacity to ensure that development
consistent with the Short Range Land Use Plan can maintain the adopted level of service.
Any potential deficiencies will be corrected by revising the Land Use Plan or the Capital
Improvements Plan (CIP).
4-1.3.6 Development orders shall not be issued and rezoning shall not be approved
without certification that adequate sewer service is available. In service areas with pre-
4-4
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ii
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
purchase capacity requirements, only proof of purchase shall constitute certification.
4-1.3.7 The City shall ensure that sufficient capacity is maintained by requiring an
evaluation of the need to increase capacity once the average daily flow (ADF) equals or
exceeds 60% of the permitted capacity or the sum of the current ADF plus future
committed ADF equals or exceeds 80% of permitted capacity.
4-1.3.8 By 1992 the City shall adopt a plan for providing and encouraging water reuse
and/or reclamation of effluent discharge for irrigation, industrial, and other non-potable
water use applications.
4-1.3.9 By 1993 the City shall adopt an industrial pretreatment ordinance as required by
the EPA, Title 40, CFR, Part 403. The ordinance shall require that pretreatment
requirements and solutions be identified as part of the site plan approval process; shall
require routine sampling and report of results; shall identify and require corrective
measures for existing operations; and shall provide for the use of sanctions such as
surcharges, issuance of citations or disconnection if standards are not met.
4-1.4 OBJECTIVE: To maximize the use of existing facilities and discourage urban
sprawl.
Measure: By July, 1992, the City shall adopt a Master Wastewater Plan identifying an
expandable service area, adequate treatment and disposal capacity to address the 2010
planning period and accompanying construction phases consistent with the 5 year Capital
Improvements Plan.
4-1.4.1 Central sewer service shall first be provided to the interior areas of the City.
4-1.4.2 The City shall not expand the central sewer service area without first evaluating the
impact on service delivery within the established service area. No expansion shall be
permitted if the adopted level of service cannot be maintained and the percent of existing
capacity currently being used is less than 25%.
4-1.4.3 Installation of package plants or septic tanks to serve development outside the
established service area shall be permitted only under the following conditions:
a. Mandatory connections to the central system within one year after central sewer
service becomes available within one mile.
b. Prior to issuance of any building permits, the developer shall demonstrate financial
responsibility through the use of cash bonds, performance bonds or letters of credit
for each of the following:
4-5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1. Full cost of installing, operating, repairing, and maintaining the package plant
system until it is tied into the central system.
2. Physical improvements for connection to the central system including but not
limited to the cost of extending the sewer lines one mile.
3. Dismantling of the plant and reclamation.
4. All hook-up and/or capacity reservation fees.
4-1.4.4 The City shall permit a developer to extend the central sewer service area only if
the proposal meets the requirements of Policy 4.2 and only if the developer bears the
entire cost of the requested extension.
4-1.4.5 The City's central sewer service area shall not extend beyond municipal
boundaries.
(WASTEWTR)
4-6
~-~--~----~~~~-~--~
~
I
-..J
"..
MAP 4.1
""'"'"
.."'rwooOroo.ao"o
CITY OF OVIEDO
SEWER SERVICE AREA
November 1991
~
~~
Ch'~l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
\\
SOLID WASTE
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SOLID WASTE
GOALS. OBJECTIVES. AND POLICIES
INTRODUCTION: The City of Oviedo is not responsible for solid waste disposal, but
cooperates fully with Seminole County in complying with the 1988 Solid Waste
Management Act. All goals, objectives, policies and levels of service contained herein are
consistent with the adopted and proposed plans for Seminole County.
4-2 GOAL: TO PROVIDE SOLID WASTE SERVICES FOR EXISTING AND FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT NEEDS, TO INCREASE RECYCLING AND TO REDUCE LANDFILL
DISPOSAL VOLUMES WITHIN THE CITY OF OVIEDO IN A COST-EFFECTIVE
ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND MANNER.
4-2.1 OBJECTIVE: To reduce the City's solid waste stream from the Class I areas of the
Osceola Landfill and meet state mandated goals for recycling and separation.
Measure: By 1995 the City shall reduce the Class I solid waste stream by 30%, in
accordance with the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER) formula.
Policies:
4-2.1.1 The City shall.continue to implement and promote the mandatory residential
recycling program.
4-2.1.2 The City shall support the County's program for handling, sorting, and marketing
recyclables.
4-2.1.3 By 1992 the City shall develop policies for internal recycling of paper goods and
aluminum cans and for the purchase of recycled products where feasible, appropriate, and
safe.
4-2.1.4 By 1992 the City shall revise its waste hauling contract to require the collection,
separation, and delivery of residential yard waste to the County composting program at the
Osceola Landfill.
4-2.1.5 The Land Development Code shall be amended to include provisions to reduce
the amount of construction and demolition debris disposed of at landfills.
4 - 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4-2.1.6 The City shall work with the Seminole County Solid Waste Task Force, schools,
and businesses, to continue local programs for recycling telephone books and Christmas
trees.
4-2.1.7 The City shall continue its public education program to foster understanding,
acceptance and participation with solid waste and recycling programs.
4-2.1.8 The City shall support Seminole County's 5 year feasibility review of a
waste-to-energy resource recovery system.
4-2.2 OBJECTIVE: To protect City residents from diseases and nuisances caused by
improper disposal of waste materials.
Measure: By 1992 the City shall adopt a litter control program.
Policies:
4-2.2.1 The litter control program shall promote anti-litter practices through public
education.
4-2.2.2 The City shall provide incentives for enforcing litter control ordinances.
4-2-2.3 The City shall work with the Solid Waste Task Force to promote a Household
Hazardous Waste Program including education, temporary storage, and licensed pick-up
and disposal.
4-2.2.4 The City shall monitor the Oviedo Materials landfill operation and coordinate with
the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation to ensure proper closure in
accordance with the plans dated August, 1986.
4-2.2.5 The City shall annually evaluate the use of a private contractor for solid waste and
recycling collection, separation, and delivery.
4-2.3. OBJECTIVE: To maintain a level of service consistent with the projected capacities
of the County facilities.
Measure: The City shall maintain 5.14 pounds per capita per day (PCD) at the Osceola
Landfill and 4.94 PCD at the Central Transfer site as an adopted level of service.
4 - 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Policies:
4-2.3.1 By 1996 the City shall revise the adopted LOS to 3.77 PCD at the Osceola Landfill
and 3.43 PCD at the Central Transfer Station.
4-2.3.2 The City shall continue to adopt levels of service consistent with those adopted
by Seminole County.
4-2.3.3 The City shall support the continued operation of the solid waste program as an
enterprise program supported by user fees, grants, etc. instead of ad valorem taxes.
4-2.3.4 The City shall continue to support an intergovernmental approach to waste
management through the Solid Waste Task Force, the ECFRPC and any future interlocal
agreements.
4 - 3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DRAINAGE
&
NATURAL GROUNDWATER
AQUIFER RECHARGE
o
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DRAINAGE AND NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE
GOALS. OBJECTIVES. AND POLICIES
INTRODUCTION: This element addresses both drainage and natural groundwater
recharge. The City adopted a Master Stormwater Master Plan in 1990 that evaluated and
addressed existing flooding problems. Current deficiencies will be corrected in
accordance with this plan. Although the City is not located in an area of prime recharge
for the Floridan Aquifer, it will adopt policies and regulations to provide for recharge where
appropriate.
4-3. GOAL: TO PROTECT THE CITIZENS OF OVIEDO FROM DEGRADATION OF
SURFACE WATER QUALITY; AND TO PROVIDE FOR ADEQUATE GROUNDWATER
RECHARGE.
4-3.1. OBJECTIVE: To upgrade the stormwater management of existing substandard
areas by correcting flooding problems and pollution problems.
Measure: Drainage facility improvements shall be consistent with the Stormwater Master
Plan adopted July, 1990 and shall be specifically identified in the 5 Year Capital
Improvement Plan.
Policies:
4-3.1.1 The City shall begin correcting deficiencies in the City drainage facilities by first
correcting existing flooding problems in the Bear Creek watershed and then proceeding
to correct and further study the Sweetwater Creek basin in accordance with the 5
- Year Capital Improvement Plan and any additional improvements recommended by the
Sweetwater Creek study.
4-3.1.2 The City shall require that all new development and redevelopment meet adopted
stormwater management level of service standards.
4-3.1.3 By 1993 the city shall complete and adopt a specific study of the Sweetwater
Creek basin which shall include recommendations for providing retention/detention
facilities eliminating direct discharge of st6rmwater.
4 - 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4-3.1.4 The City shall coordinate with FDOT and Seminole County to upgrade the
stormwater deficiencies of State and County Roads.
4-3.2. OBJECTIVE: To minimize the City's cost in upgrading existing deficiencies.
Measure: By 1992 the City shall adopt a stormwater utility ordinance.
Policies:
4-3.2.1 The City shall use stormwater utility revenues to finance improvements identified
in the Stormwater Master Plan.
4-3.2.2 The City shall identify the jurisdiction responsible or identified needed
improvements and seek appropriate funding.
4-3.3. OBJECTIVE: To protect the overall water quality of receiving waters by identifying
and regulating point and non-point pollution sources.
Measure: By April 1, 1992 the City shall adopt active and passive pollution abatement
programs to improve the quality of stormwater being discharged into receiving waters.
Policies:
4-3.3.1 By April 1, 1992 the City shall adopt procedures and schedules for street
sweeping, ditch cleaning, and functional maintenance of stormwater systems.
4-3.3.2 Upon adoption of the stormwater utility ordinance, the City shall assume functional
maintenance of all stormwater facilities in the City.
4-3.3.3 By 1993 the City shall adopt a water quality monitoring program to identify
pollution problems and sources. .
4-3.3.4 The Stormwater Master Plan shall be amended to include correction of identified
water quality deficiencies of the drainage facilities.
4-3.3.5 Runoff from parking lots shall be treated to remove oil, grease, and sediment
before it enters receiving waters.
4-3.3.6 Detention and retention areas shall be designed so that shorelines are sinuous
rather than straight and so that the length of shoreline is maximized for growth of littoral
vegetation and pollution attenuation.
4 - 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4-3.3.7 The City shall continue to require that all development provide pollution abatement
consistent with SJRWMD criteria; with no threshold exemptions.
4-3.3.8 Where soil, subsurface and water table conditions are appropriate, the first one
inch of runoff from impervious surfaces shall be routed to on-site retention basins and
discharged through percolation and evapotranspiration.
4-3.3.9 The City shall protect the functions of natural drainage features by acquiring and
preserving conservation areas and by revising the Land Development Code to protect
natural wetlands by not overloading their capacity and by providing vegetated buffer
strips to prevent erosion, trap sediment and allow for periodic flooding without structural
damage.
4-3.4. OBJECTIVE: To continue providing stormwater management facilities that can
accommodate runoff from frequently occurring and seldom occurring storm events and
provide for pollution abatement.
Measure: The City shall maintain the following level of service standards:
a. All stormwater treatment and disposal facilities shall meet the design and performance
standards established in Chapter 17-25, Section 17, 25.025 and 17.25.035 FAC.
b. The treatment of the first inch of run-off on-site shall meet the water quality standards
required by Chapter 17-032, Section 17-302.500 FAC.
c. Stormwater discharge facilities shall be designed so as not to degrade the receiving
water body below the minimum conditions for the designated use of it classification as
established in Chapter 17-302 FAC.
d. The design storm standard shall be the 25 year/24 hour storm event for systems with
positive discharge and the 25 year/4 day event for systems without a positive discharge.
Policies:
4-3.4.1 The City shall require that all new development and redevelopment meet the
adopted level of service standards for stormwater management.
4-3.4.2 Stormwater management systems shall be designed to function properly for a
minimum 20 year life.
4 - 3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4-3.5. OBJECTIVE: To protect and maintain the function of natural groundwater aquifer
recharge areas.
Measure: By 1992 the City shall amend the Land Development Code to include special
open space requirements and stormwater management criteria for aquifer recharge areas.
Policies:
4-3.5.1 Areas of prime or moderate natural groundwater recharge shall be specifically
regulated to protect the recharge function.
4-3.5.2 Stormwater management systems in areas of aquifer recharge shall be designed
to ensure recharge rather than discharge of stormwater.
4-3.5.3 In areas of prime or moderate recharge impervious surface shall not exceed 50%
of the total site area.
4-3.5.4 By 1992 the City shall adopt a plan for providing and encouraging water reuse
and/or reclamation for irrigation, industrial, or other non-potable water use applications.
4-3.6. OBJECTIVE: To ensure that adequate drainage facilities exist to meet the
demands of the anticipated problems.
Measure: Drainage facility improvements consistent with the Stormwater Master Plan shall
be included in the 5-Year Capital Improvements Plan, and the Land Development Code
shall include development standards consistent with the adopted LOS standards.
Policies:
4-3.6.1 The City shall continue to require development to fulfill the current stormwater
management standards of the Oviedo Land Development Code and the St. Johns River
Water Management District.
4-3.6.2 The City shall continue to require that all proposed subdivisions (both residential
and non-residential) design and construct a master stormwater management system.
4-3.6.3 The City shall revise and update its Stormwater Master Plan as more information
becomes available and design criteria are updated.
4 - 4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4-3.7. OBJECTIVE: To discourage urban sprawl by maximizing existing drainage
facilities.
Measure: No new major conveyance systems shall be crated and the capacity of existing
facilities shall not be increased until excess capacity has been absorbed.
(DRAINAGE)
4 - 5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 4.1
5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
FY 91-92 FY 92-93 FY 93-94 FY 94-95 FY 95-96
-----------------------------------------------------
Drainage
1) Clark St. (8-12) 16 I
2) l1aple St.
(8-14 & 8-15) 43 I
3) Pirie & 8roadway
(8-23) 26 I
. 4) Clark St. & 5. R.
426 -5-8) 65 I
5) Broadway &
Central
(5-9 & 5-13) 286 I
6) St. Johanna Drive
(5-22) 60 83
7) Sweetwater Cl"k. @
l1agnolia (5-25) 195 I
8) Stephen St. (E-2E) 117 I
9) Franklin St. &
Ave. 8 (5-17) 13 I
10) M:isc. System Impvt. 2.5 I
11) l1iac. Equipment 22.5 I
Sub-Total 41 208 134 177
4-6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
POTABLE WATER
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
'I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
POTABLE WATER
GOALS. OBJECTIVES. AND POLICIES
INTRODUCTION: On July 2, 1990, the City adopted a Potable Water Master Plan that
included the major system improvements needed to accommodate the projected new
development through 2010. This plan is included and adopted herein. Although this
element addresses treatment capacity and distribution, the City recognizes the fragility
of its water source and may amend this element as needed to respond to additional
research and'evaluation,
4-4 GOAL: TO PROVIDE A COST EFFECTIVE, ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND
POTABLE WATER SYSTEM THAT WILL SERVE EXISTING AND FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT.
4-4.1 OBJECTIVE: To conserve the potable water resources by lowering the per capita
consumption rate.
Measure: By 1996, the per capita consumption rate shall be reduced from 163 GPCD to
100 GPCD.
Policies:
4-4.1.1 To provide an incentive for conservation, by April 1, 1992 water user fees shall
be revised to include a sliding scale of rates with higher rates being charged for higher
volumes.
4-4.1.2 The Land Development Code shall be revised to include requirements for
xeriscaping and use of native plant species.
4-4.1.3 By 1992 the City shall adopt a plan for providing and encouraging water re-use
and/or reclamation for irrigation, industrial or other non-potable water use applications.
4-4.1.4 The City shall educate the public on the need for habitual conservation and
methods of protecting the City's water supply.
4-4.1.5 By April 1, 1992 the City shall revise, strengthen and update its Water
Conservation Ordinance to include educational programs, leak detection programs,
mandatory low water consumption plumbing devices and permanent water use restrictions
for irrigation and other non-essential water uses.
4 - 1
,I
I'
I
,I
I
I
I'
,I
I
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
4-4.1.6 The City shall support the efforts of the St. John's River Water Management
District in determining aquifer boundaries and in establishing safe withdrawal depths and
rates.
4-4.1.7 The City shall continue to require the use of water conserving plumbing fixtures
as required by Chapter 553 F.S.
4-4.2. OBJECTIVE: To minimize the City's cost In completing water system
improvements.
Measure: By 1992 the City will adopt revised user fees and capital recovery charges to
cover the plant expansions and improvements in the Master Water Plan.
Policies:
4-4.2.1 All water system improvements, including distribution piping, storage, and wells
shall be constructed in accordance with the Potable Water Master Plan.
4-4.2.2 All water system improvements required for new development shall be donated
free of charge to the City of Oviedo.
4-4.2.3 Future development shall pay for the system improvements it requires.
4-4.2.4 The City may recover the cost of extending water service to existing developed
areas by assessing benefitted properties.
4-4.2.5 The City shall continue to require that new development extend distribution lines
along the entire property boundary.
4-4.2.6 By 1992 the City shall revise the rate structures for commercial establishments so
that rates are based on flows rather than square footage.
4-4.3. OBJECTIVE: To establish and maintain a potable water system with sufficient
capacity to meet existing and future service demands.
Measure: The City shall adopt and maintain a level of service of 350 gallons/day/
Equivalent Residential Connection. Peak facility capacity shall be maintained at a
minimum of twice the permitted capacity. Fire flows shall meet or exceed 750 GPM at a
20 PSI residual pressure in single family residential areas and 1250 GPM in other
developed areas. Storage capacity shall meet or exceed 15% of permitted capacity.
4 - 2
I
I'
I
.1
I
.1,
I
,I
f
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
Policies:
4-4.3.1 Normal flow demands for design shall be calculated on the basis of full ultimate
development.
4-4.3.2 Water distribution systems shall at least provide for the peak hourly flow or the
peak daily flow plus fire flow, whichever is greater.
4-4'.3.3 Water distribution systems shall maintain a minimum pressure of 20 PSI
throughout the system.
4-4.3.4 The City shall continue to comply with Florida Department of Environmental
Regulation (FDER) rules and requirements.
4-4.3.5 The City shall annually evaluate available capacity and. if necessary, adjust the
5 year CIP and/or the Short Range Land Use Plan to ensure that water service is available
to maintain the adopted level of service for existing and committed development.
4-4.3.6 The City shall require system looping wherever possible to increase overall
capacity and service.
4-4.3.7 The City shall maintain its current interlocal agreement with Seminole County to
mutually cooperate in the provision of water service capacity by each reserving 175,000
GPD for the others use.
4-4.3.8 The City shall ensure that sufficient capacity is maintained by requiring an
evaluation of the need to increase capacity once the average daily flow (ADF) equals or
exceeds 60% of the permitted capacity or the sum of the current ADF plus future
committed ADF exceeds 80% of permitted capacity.
4-4.4. OBJECTIVE: To protect the quality of the available water supply through
groundwater protection regulations, intergovernmental coordination and well-field location
requirements.
Measure: By April 1, 1992, the City shall adopt a wellfield protection ordinance
designating prohibited land uses and restrictions for overlay districts covering the
protection zone cones of influence illustrated on the FLUM and the Zoning Map.
These restrictions shall govern the use and placement of stormwater management
facilities, sewage effluent disposal and storage of hazardous materials in order to prevent
potential contamination of the groundwater.
4 - 3
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1,
I
,I,
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
Policies:
4-4.4.1 By 1992 the City shall adopt a back flow prevention ordinance requiring
inspection, testing, and maintenance of backflow devices as well as retrofitting of existing
facilities.
4-4.4.2 The backflow prevention ordinance shall include provisions for enforcement,
including but not limited to fines, surcharges, and disconnection.
4-4.4.3 The City shall continually monitor revisions to the Safe Drinking Water Act of
1974, as amended, to ensure compliance.
4-4.4.4 The City shall coordinate with the SJRWMD to monitor new well sites that may
affect the quality and/or quantity of the City of Oviedo water supply.
4-4.4.5 The City shall continue to monitor and evaluate the use of low production wells
at shallow depths to prevent salt water intrusion of the water supply.
4-4.4.6 The City shall pursue acquisition of additional well sites south and west of the City
limits.
4-4.4.7 The top priority of all system improvements shall be any improvement necessary
to correct an immediate threat to public health or safety.
4-4.4.8 Amended 7-19-93. Wellfield Protection Area. To protect the quality and quantity
of Oviedo's potable water supply, a wellfield protection zone shall be established within
a radius of two hundred and 1,000 feet from each potable water well with a permitted
capacity of equal to or exceeding 100,000 gallons per day. The following activities are
prohibited within these zones:
a. Zone of Exclusion. within a one hundred twenty-five (125) foot radius of an
existing or designated protected wellfield, no development activities shall occur.
Within a two-hundred foot radius, septic tanks, sanitary sewer facilities or solid
waste disposal facilities shall be prohibited.
b. Wellfield Protection Zone. within 1,000 feet of a protected wellfield, the
following uses are prohibited:
1. Landfills.
2. Facilities for the bulk storage (including underground storage,) handling or
processing of materials on the Florida Substance List (Ch. 442, F.S.
4 - 4
I
I
I
,I
I
,I
I
I,
f
,II
,I
I.
II
I
,I
,I
I
I
I
3. Activities that require the storage, use, handling, production or transportation of
restricted substances; agricultural chemicals, petroleum products, hazardous/toxic
wastes, industrial chemicals, medical wastes, etc.
4. Feedlots or other concentrated animal facilities.
5. Wastewater treatment plants, percolation ponds, septic tanks and similar
facilities.
6. Mines.
7. Excavation of waterways or drainage facilities which intersect the water table.
Special Restrictions on Development Allowed Within the Wellhead Protection Zone
are listed as follows:
a. Stormwater management practices shall not include drainage wells and
sinkholes for stormwater disposal where recharge is into potable water aquifers.
b. Where development is proposed in areas with existing wells, the City shall
establish a schedule to abandon these wells as potable water sources, and when
abandoning to seal and plug according to Chapter Rule 17.28, Florida
Administrative Code.
4-4.4.9 The City shall use the following programs to protect the groundwater supply:
a. Public Education: The City shall promote voluntary protection efforts by
identifying problems and presenting solutions and preventive measures through
pamphlets and newsletters.
b. Conservation: The City will enforce its water conservation ordinance and adopt
a variable rate charge to lower consumption and slow salt water intrusion.
c. The City shall establish a program by 1994 to provide incentives to encourage
or to require new developments to use low volume plumbing fixtures.
4-4.4.10 Prior to each annual review and update of the 5 Year Capital Plan, the City shall
evaluate the need for additional water treatment methods to comply with the Safe Drinking
Water Standards.
4 - 5
,.
I
I
.1
I
,I
"
I
I
I
I,
I
I
.,
I
I
I
I
I
4-4.5. OBJECTIVE: To correct existing potable water facility deficiencies.
Measure: The City shall annually adopt a financially feasible Capital Improvements Plan
which includes the potable water facility improvements necessary to correct existing
deficiencies as well as those improvements needed to service future and committed
development.
Policies:
4-4.5.1 The City shall annually evaluate its 5 Year Capital Improvements Plan to ensure
that deficiencies identified in the Potable Water Master Plan have been addressed.
4-4.5.2 The Capital Improvements Plan shall include any necessary improvements to the
storage, distribution or treatment portions of the entire potable water system.
4-4.6. OBJECTIVE: To discourage urban sprawl by maximizing the use of existing
facilities:
Measure: The potable water distribution system shall not be extended beyond the
established service area unless the adopted level of service standards can be met and the
percent of current capacity being used is more than 50%.
Policies:
4-4.6.1 The water service area shall first be extended to the interior portions of the City
and along the S.R. 434 corridor.
4-4.6.2 The City shall permit a developer to extend the distribution system and expand the
service area only under the following conditions:
a. The proposal must meet the conditions of the objective measure and other
applicable elements of the Comprehensive Plan.
b. The developer shall bear the entire cost of the requested extension and any
associated system improvements.
4-4.6.3 All new development shall be required to connect to the City water system unless
the applicant can demonstrate an overriding health, safety, or welfare concern.
4 - 6
I
I
I
I,
I
I
"
I,
I
:1
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
A map of the proposed system improvements is included as Figure G-1 and a tabulation
of proposed Potable Water System Improvements and the related costs are shown in
Table G-2.
(WATER)
4 - 7
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
,I
I
,I,
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
,I
'I
WATER SYSTEM MAP AVAILABLE FROM THE CITY OF OVIEDO
UPON REQUEST.
IT WAS NOT REPRODUCED FOR THIS DOCUMENT DUE TO COST.
ADDITIONAL CHARGE MAY BE REQUIRED FOR MAP.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CONSERVATION
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CONSERVATION
GOALS. OBJECTIVES. AND POLICIES
INTRODUCTION: The Conservation Element addresses the preservation and protection
of both local and regional resources. All environmentally sensitive areas are delineated
on the Environmental Overlay of the Future Land Use map series. Areas of local and
regional significance will be designated as Conservation land uses on the Short Range
and Long Range Land Use Plans. Areas of local significance will be designated for
acquisition as permanent open space, and areas of regional significance will be preserved
and regulated in accordance with regional policies and standards. The City may also
assist in the acquisition of regionally significant areas, but will not carry the full financial
obligation.
5.1 GOAL: TO APPROPRIATELY USE, MANAGE, PROTECT, RESTORE, AND
CONSERVE THE VALUABLE NATURAL RESOURCES WITHIN THE CITY OF OVIEDO.
5-1.1. OBJECTIVE: To conserve, appropriately use, and protect the quality and quantity
of potable water resources within the City.
Measure: By 1992, the City shall adopt a revised and updated Water Conservation
ordinance.
Policies:
5-1.1.1 By 1992 the City shall adopt a plan for providing and encouraging water reuse
and/or reclamation for irrigation, industrial, or other non-potable water use applications.
5-1.1.2 The Land Development Code shall be revised to include requirements for
protection of native vegetation, xeriscaping and use of drought-resistant species.
5-1.1.3 By April 1, 1992, the City shall adopt an emergency water shortage ordinance
consistent with the SJRWMD water shortage plan.
5-1 .1.4 The City shall continue to document and accurately record the existing and
reported locations of:
5 - 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I'
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
'I
potential commercial and industrial hazardous wastes
sites where petroleum or hazardous chemicals are stored
landfills and waste disposal sites
in order to enforce regulatory controls and to prevent storage or spillage of hazardous
wastes in wetlands, floodplains, waterwell cones of influence and other environmentally
sensitive areas.
5-1.1.5 The City shall designate specific cones of influence for each City well site based
on the best available data. These protection zones shall be illustrated on the official
zoning and land use maps in order to designate the areas where "overlay" restrictions will
apply.
5-1.1.6 Amended 7-19-1993. By April, 1992 the City shall incorporate a well-field
protection ordinance into the Land Development Codes which is consistent with the
wellfield protection program established in Policy 4.8 of the Conservation Element.
5-1.1.7 By 1992 the City shall adopt a maintenance and leak detection program for the
urban potable water supply system in order to limit waste of the resource.
5-1.2. OBJECTIVE: Amended 7-19-93. Protect Quality and Quantity of Surface and
Groundwater.
To conserve, appropriately use, and protect the quantity and quality of surface waters and
floodplain areas within the City through stormwater management regulations, buffers,
wetland protection programs, and development regulations implemented through the
following policies:
FLOODPLAINS:
Policies:
5-1.2.1 Protection and Maintenance of the 10 Year Floodplain. No development shall be
allowed within the 10 Year Flood Zone with exception to the following conditions:
a. surface water management structures protecting the natural flow regime and
flood water storage capacity;
5 - 2
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
I
I
I
b. water-related and passive recreation facilities, and conservation facilities not
affected by periodic flooding;
c. roads, causeways and bridges necessary to provide access to confined
areas or further the health and safety of the public. Such facilities shall be
designed to maintain the natural flow regime of surface water and run-off,
including the provision of compensatory storage.
5-1.2.2 Protection and Maintenance of the 100 Year Floodplain. Applicants of
development and redevelopment shall position structures and impervious surfaces to
areas outside the 100 Year Flood Zone according to qualifying circumstances and
provisions stipulated below. Where development must occur within the Flood Zone to
maintain reasonable use and value of property, compensatory mitigation shall maintain no
loss of its natural flow regime and flow water storage capacity. The 100 Year Flood Zone
shall be delineated within the Future Land Use Map Series, and its demarcations shall be
determined by the most recent Flood Insurance Maps prepared by the Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
a. Prohibited Land Use Activity. Storing or processing material that would, in
the event of the 100 year storm, be buoyant, flammable, explosive, or
potentially injurious to human, animal or plant life is prohibited. Material or
equipment immune to substantial damage by flooding may be stored if
securely anchored to prevent flotation or if readily removable from the area
upon receipt of a flood warning. Wastewater treatment plants and septic
tanks shall not be placed within the Flood Zone.
b. Clustering Development Outside the Flood Zone. Applicants of new
residential development shall cluster homes outside the 100 Year Flood
Zone unless geographical restrictions and floodplain configuration prohibit
its application. Residential development otherwise allowed in the area of the
100 Year Floodplain are eligible to transfer density to adjacent upland areas
up to a density equal to twenty (20) percent above that allowed for the
upland site outside the 100 Year Flood Zone. .
c. Limitations and Restrictions on New Residential Development with the Flood
Zone. The following limitations and restrictions shall apply to new residential
development proposed within the Flood Zone Area:
1. Compensatory Mitigation. Where development design can not
accommodate clustering due to the configuration of the 100 Year
Flood Plain, or where the extent of the Flood Zone limits the practical
use of clustering, compensatory storage shall be provided through
excavation of a volume of uplands equivalent to the loss of storage
within the 100 Year Flood Zone resulting from placement of fill or
5 - 3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
6.
7.
construction of impervious surface. Only adjacent uplands outside
the Flood Zone are eligible to be excavated.
2.
Residential Subdivision Site Plan Design. Plans and designs for
development proposing to alter uplands of the flood zone through
compensatory storage shall first minimize potential flood damage by
positioning recreation, conservation, and common conservation open
space to those areas within the Flood Zone, reserving land outside
the Flood Zone for development. The Flood Zone shall be delineated
on all final development plans submitted to the City.
3.
Sanitary Sewer Systems. All development locating in the 100 Year
Flood Plain shall connect to a central sanitary sewer system.
4.
Stormwater Facilities. Drainage facilities shall be in place and
functional concurrent with deadlines established in the Concurrency
Management System. Such drainage facilities shall be designed to:
a. Comply with the city's established level of service standards;
b. Maintain natural flow regime an function of the floodplain;
c. Efficiently function with connected drainage facilities under
jurisdictional authority of the St. Johns River Water
Management District.
d. Support and further regional stormwater master plans
prepared by Seminole County and the SJRWMD.
5.
First Floor Elevation. All new construction must have the first floor
elevation for all enclosed areas at least twelve (12) inches above the
100 Year flood elevation.
Construction Material and Methods. All new development shall be
constructed with material and utility equipment resistant to flood
damage, and using methods and practices that will minimize flood
damage and prevent the pollution of surface waters during a 100 year
storm event.
Service Facilities and Utilities. Electrical, heating, ventilation,
plumbing, air conditioning, and other service facilities shall be
designed or located to prevent water from entering or accumulating
within the components during a 1 DO-year storm event. All water
supply and sanitary sewage systems shall be designed to minimize
5 - 4
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
or eliminate both infiltration of flood water into the systems and
discharges from the systems into the flood waters.
5-1.2.3 Existing Development in Floodplains. All redevelopment plans for previously
impacted floodplains shall thoroughly analyze the potential for restoration of the floodplain
areas, and provide that restoration as required by the City.
5-1.2.4 Development With the Econlockhatchee River Protection Area. Development
within this Protection Area shall be governed by standards and regulations incorporated
into the Econlockhatchee River Protection Ordinance (No. 852), incorporated into the
City's Land Development Code on April 20, 1992. Boundaries of the Econlockhatchee
Protection Area are delineated in Map C-1. (Map attached.)
5-1.2.5 Sweetwater Creek. By 1993 the City shall complete a study of Sweetwater Creek
drainage basin and adopt applicable regulations and corrective measures to address the
stormwater quantity and surface water quality of this system.
WETLANDS
5-1.2.6 Protection and Conservation of Wetlands. Wetlands shall be defined as areas
which are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water with a frequency or duration
sufficient to support, and that under normal conditions do support, a prevalence of
vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. wetlands within the
jurisdictional boundaries of State agencies shall be protected under the rules and
regulations established by such agencies. Wetlands indigenous to the Oviedo area
include deep marsh, mixed hardwood swamp, cypress wetlands, bayhead, hydric
hammock, shallow marsh, and wet prairie.
a. Determination of Wetland Classification. All wetland areas on a proposed
development site shall be identified and analyzed for purposes of determining
wetland significance. Determination of wetland boundaries shall be based on
existing hydrology, soils, vegetative characteristics and the procedures and
information as defined in the document "Seminole County Planing Guidelines for
Natural Resources".
b. Protection Based on Significance. No development shall be allowed within
wetlands unless activities are deemed compatible subject to compliance with
performance standards set forth in the document "Planning Guidelines for Natural
Resources". where site conditions preclude the use of performance standards and
where opportunities exist to enhance wetland or environmental benefits, the City
shall require mitigation/compensation on a site-specific basis. Mitigation and
compensation shall equal or exceed the volume of wetland area removed from the
5 - 5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
site. Those activities for which compatibility rankings and performance standards
have been developed include:
1 . boardwalks, docks, gazebos;
2. bulkheading (impounding, interrupting or diverting surface water);
3. clearing of vegetation in conjunction with construction of permitted
structures, but limited to that necessary to allow reasonable use of
such structures;
4. cultivating naturally occurring agricultural and horticultural products;
5. discharge of domestic, agricultural or industrial wastes (pursuant to
DER permit or the discharge of stormwater runoff from adjacent
lands);
6. drainage ditches;
7. dredging (other than mosquito control or drainage ditches);
8. filling;
9. harvesting of timber and wood products;
10. hazardous material (storage, use, or disposal of any hazardous
material);
11. landscaping and establishing planting;
12. restoration or expansion or modification of existing structures and
improved areas;
13. septic tanks (installation of septic tanks);
14. solid waste disposal;
15. stormwater retention/detention basins;
16. structure (construction of permitted structure);
17. utility installation.
5 - 6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
c.
Permit Requirements. Where dredge or fill activities are proposed for a
wetland, appropriate permits must be obtained from the SJRWMD and
Department of Environmental Regulations, and where necessary, applicable
to the United States Army Corps of Engineers. If an Isolated wetland is
involved or proposed to be filled or dredged, an appropriate Management
and Surface Water Permit must be obtained from the St. Johns River Water
Management District as it relates to the Isolated Wetland Rules in Chapter
40C-1, F.A.C. Where no permit from at State or Federal agency is
necessary, development shall be limited to compatible activities listed in
"Seminole County Planning Guidelines for Natural Resources". If the City
determines that such activities will not adequately protect the wetland, then
only passive recreation facilities shall be allowed.
(Passive recreation facilities include low-activity based recreation facilities
including picnic facilities (less than .125 FAR), hiking trails and boardwalks
(not to exceed a width of four feet) fishing piers, and observation towers.
d.
Residential Density in Wetlands. where wetland characteristics allow
residential development as demonstrated in "Planning Guidelines for Natural
Resources", density shall not exceed on unit per ten acres.
e.
Density Bonus. Proposed residential development sites designed to
preserve on-site wetlands are eligible to transfer development to upland
areas at a rate of one unit per five acres up to the extent that density of the
upland area does not exceed twenty (20) percent more than that allowed for
the site.
f.
Wetland Buffers. Development shall be limited in the transition zone
between wetland and upland communities to the extent necessary to
preserve the type of wetland classification. Performance standards
stipulated in the "Planning Guidelines for Natural Resources" shall regulate
bulkheading, drainage ditches, dredging, filling, hazardous materials, solid
waste disposal, and stormwater retention/detention basins within the
transition area.
Performance standards set forth in "Planning Guidelines for Natural
Resources" are used in determining an appropriate buffer between the
boundary of the wetland and the point where development can occur. the
applicant of development must demonstrate that the buffer is sufficient to
protect the wetland and its hydrological connection within the transition
zone. Determination of the wetland buffer shall be approved by the City
during the development review process.
5 - 7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Wetlands located in the Econlockhatchee River Protection Area (Map C-1)
shall be subject to development controls governed by those contained in the
Econlockhatchee River Basin Protection Regulations established within
Article XX of the City's Land Development Code adopted April 20, 1992
(previously Ordinance No. 852.).
LAKES
5-1.2.7 Shoreline Protection. Lake front single family lots shall maintain a minimum 50
foot building setback from the normal high water elevation and construct a swale and berm
system to prevent lot drainage from flowing directly into the lake.
Multiple family and non-residential development located along a lake front shall maintain
a building setback of at least 100 feet from the normal high water elevation. Additional
setback may be required based on the elevation of stormwater management practices
used to control storm run-off with proposed density and intensity of use.
Development activities allowed with this buffer zone shall include boardwalks and docks,
gazebos, picnic areas and similar passive recreation facilities. Prior to construction of a
dock or fishing pier into a Class III state water, appropriate permits must be obtained from
the SJRWMD and FDNR.
(Passive recreation facilities include low-activity based recreation facilities including picnic
facilities (less than .125 FAR), hiking trails and boardwalks (not to exceed a width of four
feet), fishing piers, and observation towers.
5-1.2.8 By 1993 the City shall adopt a water quality monitoring program and pursue
corrective and preventive measures to ensure that the surface waters meet state
standards.
5-1.2.9 Stormwater management structures shall be sufficiently separated from
conservation areas in order to insure that no adverse impact occurs to the hydrologic
regime of the conservation area. .
5-1.2.10 By 1993 the City shall complete a study of the Sweetwater Creek drainage basin
and adopt applicable regulations and corrective measures to address the stormwater
quantity and surface water quality of this system.
5-1.3. OBJECTIVE: Amended 7-19-93. Protection and Conservation of Soils: To
appropriately use, protect, and conserve soils by restricting land clearing and requiring
erosion and sediment controls that prevent on and off-site damage through implementation
of the following policies:
5 - 8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Policies:
5-1.3.1 Prior to clearing or grading of land, approval must be obtained from the City. An
applicant submitting a request to clear or grade land must demonstrate all that such
activity utilizes best management practices to control soil erosion.
5-1.3.2 Any surface mining area shall be reclaimed as required by the Department of
Natural Resources.
5-1.3.3 The City shall pursue County, State, and/or Federal aid in the clean-up of any
identified hazardous waste contamination areas.
5-1.3.4 The City shall monitor construction sites and enforce soil erosion prevention
requirements in accordance with the policies established under this objective. the Land
Development Codes shall include soil erosion prevention requirements which further
policies set forth under this objective.
5-1.3.5 The City shall continue to require construction sites to follow the "best
management practices" found in "Nonpoint Source Assessment and Nonpoint Source
Control Needs for Urban and Construction Activities" (FDER 1979) and "Water Quality and
Construction" (FDER 1979).
5-1.3.6 The City shall continue to require that an erosion and sediment control plan be
submitted for all construction projects. This plan shall insure the following:
a. The development is planned to fit the natural conditions of the site.
b. The smallest practical area of land is exposed for the shortest possible time.
c. Perimeter protection IS provided to prevent off-site sediment and erosion
damage.
5-1.3.7 Sediment shall be retained on the site of the development. Where necessary,
sedimentation basins must be provided to reduce suspended solids.
5-1.3.8 No site alteration shall cause sedimentation of wetlands, pollution of downstream
wetlands, or reduce the natural retention or filtering capabilities of wetlands.
5-1.3.9 Intermittent watercourses, such as swales, must be vegetated.
5-1.3.10 Artificial watercourses and water bodies must be designed so that the velocity of
flow is low enough to prevent erosion and so that aeration and circulation are optimized.
5 - 9
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5-1.4. OBJECTIVE: Amended 7-19-93
To conserve, appropriately use and protect native vegetative communities by regulating
development of wetland areas, limiting removal of trees and vegetation, requiring minimum
open space areas for development, and thoroughly analyzing the natural conditions of
proposed development sites.
Policies:
5-1.4.1 Preservation of Wetland Habitats. Wetland protection shall occur consistent with
the provisions under Objective 2 of the Conservation Element.
5-1.4.2 Tree and Vegetation Protection. The City shall implement a tree and vegetation
protection program to reduce the removal of significant native trees and vegetation and to
require equitable replacement of trees and vegetation requiring removal to allow fair use
of property. Significant trees shall be classified as those with a diameter at breast height
of eight inches or more and are not listed by the Florida Department of Agriculture as
exotic plants recommended for removal. Diameter at Breast Height is defined as the
average diameter of the trunk of a tree measured at four and one-half (4 1/2) vertical feet
above natural grade. The tree and vegetation program shall comprise the following
activities:
a. Applications for development shall include a plan that indicates which significant
trees will be removed and how the remaining trees will be protected from
detrimental effects of construction. Removed trees shall be equitably replaced with
trees possessing the natural ability to achieve similar canopy characteristics. The
number and type of replacement trees must be approved by the City.
b. Vegetative landscaping must be provided with all developments and shall be
approved by the City. A minimum of twenty-five percent of the vegetated
landscaped area must contain native vegetation.
c. The City shall continue to participate in the Tree City USA Program.
5-1.4.3 All development shall maintain a minimum of 25% of a site as open space with
native vegetation. The open space impact fee ordinance will include provisions for transfer
of this requirement from areas without native vegetation to those areas of excessive
vegetation, rare upland areas, and high quality wetland systems.
5-1.4.4 Open Space Impact Fee. By 1994 the City shall evaluate the merits of
implementing an open space impact fee.
5-1.4.5 The City shall require that proposals for development identify and locate any on-
site plant species listed by the Florida Department of Agriculture. These species shall be
5 - 10
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
preserved as native open space or conserved through relocation of plants according to
procedures approved by the Florida Department of Natural resources. the Tree
Conservation Plan required by all new development shall identify such species and
describe methods of conservation or preservation.
5-1.4.6 The City shall coordinate with Seminole County and adopt consistent ordinances
by 1993 to protect the unique vegetative communities located in the Black Hammock area.
These ordinances shall identify specific species of concern, prohibit destruction of those
identified species and regulate development of adjacent areas.
5-1.4.7 The environmentally sensitive areas depicted in the Future Land Use Map Series
shall constitute an overlay zone to identify potential wetland and floodplain areas of
special concern. No new development may be approved in this area until a site survey is
conducted by a professional hydrologist, engineer ecologist, or biologist, as the case may
warrant, and approved by City staff.
Wetland boundaries shall be flagged utilizing the definitions and standards established in
the "Seminole County Wetlands Guide".
The following must be demonstrated through such site survey:
a. The proposed development not lie within the 100 year floodplain, nor encroach
wetlands if deemed an unacceptable use; or
b. There is no disturbance of wildlife habitat for endangered and threatened, or
species of special concern;
c. The development will not encroach into wetland transitional areas unless deemed
a compatible activity within the "Wetlands Field Guide".
d. Natural flow regime and flood water storage capacity shall be preserved;
e. Mitigation shall be required if this disturbance or alteration is approved:
f. On-site drainage facilities shall be provided to maintain quality of surface waters:
Road, stormwater management or similar public facilities are allowed within
environmentally sensitive areas only under the following situations:
1. To maintain natural flow regime and flood water storage capacity of the
basin drainage system;
2. Road access to isolated developable land is not economically feasible
unless through en environmentally sensitive area;
5 - 11
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3. Emergency roadway access is necessary to protect life and property,
including protection and conservation efforts for wildlife and natural
vegetation (e.g., fire breaks).
Under such circumstances, compensatory mitigation shall maintain natural
flow regime and flood water storage capacity for flood plain protection, and
wetland mitigation to replace lost habitat will be include as a cost to provide
such public improvements.
5-1.4.8 Isolated vegetated wetlands shall be maintained and incorporated into stormwater
management facilities to the maximum extent possible.
5-1.4.9 The City shall coordinate with Seminole County and adopt consistent ordinances
by 1993 to protect the unique vegetative communities located in the Black Hammock
areas. These ordinances shall identify specific species of concern, prohibit destruction of
those identified species and regulate development of adjacent areas.
5-1.4.10 The environmentally sensitive areas depicted in the Future Land Use Map
Series shall constitute an overlay zone to identify potential wetland and floodplain areas
of special concern. No new development may be approved in this area unless the
following can be demonstrated:
a. The property does not actually lie within the 100 year floodplain or contain
viable wetlands OR:
b. There is no disturbance of wildlife habitat.
c. There is no loss of flood storage capacity.
d. There is no disturbance of native vegetation.
e. There is no negative impact on natural resources OR
f. There is an overriding public concern that necessitates disturbance or
alteration. Mitigation will be required if this disturbance or alteration is
approved.
(The Map of Environmentally Sensitive Areas has been revised to include a legend and
date. )
5 - 12
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5-1.5. OBJECTIVE: To protect air quality within the City of Oviedo.
Measure: The air quality will meet or exceed EPA standards.
Policies:
5-1.5.1 The City will continue to coordinate with regional agencies to establish an air
quality monitoring system.
5-1.5.2 The City will monitor the EPA air quality reports and requirements on industries
within the City, and pursue Code Enforcement when appropriate.
5-1.5.3 The City will continue to enforce environmental preservation and landscaping
requirements of the Land Development Code to ensure adequate vegetation and green
space.
5-1.6. OBJECTIVE: To conserve, appropriately use, and protect fisheries, wildlife habitat,
and marine habitat by designating conservation areas and requiring identification and
protection.
Measure: The Land Development Code shall be revised to include habitat protection
measures and requirements for wildlife identification and analysis.
Policies:
5-1.6.1 Proposals for development shall identify the presence and location of anyon-site
species of Special Concern, Threatened or Endangered as listed by the Florida Game and
Freshwater Fish commission or the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. This information shall
then be forwarded to the Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission for review.
5-1.6.2 Developments with on-site species of Special Concern, Threatened or
Endangered status shall submit a management plan to the Florida Game and Freshwater
Fish Commission for approval. The City shall then include the plan as a condition of
approval.
5-1.6.3 The City shall require that development be clustered away from the habitats of
endangered and threatened wildlife and species of special concern.
5-1.6.4 To the maximum extent possible, the City shall maintain wildlife corridors and
prevent the fragmentation of large ecological community associations.
5 - 13
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5-1.6.5 The Land Development Code shall be revised to require buffering of wetlands and
the preserved habitats of endangered and threatened wildlife and species of special
concern. Said buffers shall be consistent with ECFRPC and SJRWMD district
requirements.
5-1.6.6 The City shall pursue acquisition of conservation areas to insure continued
protection and to provide adequate open space and habitat areas.
(CON-GOAL)
5 - 14
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
LAKE JESUP
\J1
..
....
""
-
-
-
-
-
-
LEGEND
[ill]
mw
~
8
~
ECONlOCKHATCHEE RIVER CORRIDOR
PROTECTION lONE. CITY OF OVIEDO
ECONlOCKHATCHEE RIVER CORRIDOR
PROTECTION lONE. SEMINOLE COUNTY
ECONlOCKHATCHEE RIVER
DRAINAGE BASIN
I:
~
"
(II
.
..
CORPORATE LIMITS
NOlO: Thla mop la Inlondod 10
serve .. . general guide.
Ro'e, 10 ordlnonee 10' apeellle
requirements.
Mil..
Jr;ii;\
1 \1V
li2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
RECREATION
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
RECREATION & OPEN SPACE
GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the Recreation and Open Space Element is two-fold.
First, the element addresses the active recreation needs of the City's population by
establishing levels of service for park acreage and recreational facilities. Secondly, the
element provides a mechanism for protecting natural resources and maintaining various
environments for future generations.
The park acreage level of service standard will insure that public lands are reserved for
the development of recreational facilities - that there will always be a certain amount of
land available to the general population for active and passive recreation. The facility
standards help to balance the types of recreational opportunities available to the citizens.
Both private and public facilities are included in measuring the facility level of service.
This inventory can then be used to determine facilities for future community and
neighborhood parks.
6-1 GOAL: TO PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN A RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE
SYSTEM THAT WILL MEET THE PRESENT AND FUTURE NEEDS OF THE CITIZENS
OF THE CITY OF OVIEDO AND PROTECT, ENHANCE AND IMPROVE THE NATURAL
ENVIRONMENT WITHIN THE CITY.
6-1.1. OBJECTIVE: To ensure that all future development provides adequate recreation
and open space to maintain or exceed the City's adopted level of service.
Measure: By 1992, the City will update the Recreation and Open Space Impact Fees to
fund open space acquisition and park development.
Policies:
6-1.1.1 Because neighborhood parks have a limited service area (1/2 mile), the
development, operation, and maintenance of these parks shall be a neighborhood
responsibility. General city funds and impact fees shall be directed to community parks
serving the entire City population.
6 - 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
6-1.1.2 The City will continue to enforce the Land Development Code requirement that all
residential development provide recreation and open space equal to the neighborhood
.park acreage level of service.
6-1.1.3 The City will continue to enforce and utilize the following definition of open space:
."Open space means an area that
- is not encumbered with any substantial structure.
- is not devoted to use as a roadway, parking area, or sidewalk.
- is left in its natural or undisturbed state (as of the date development
began) if wooded (except for the cutting of trails for walking or jogging), or
if not wooded at the time of development, is landscaped for ballfields, picnic
areas, or similar facilities, or is properly vegetated and landscaped with the
objective of creating a wooded area or other area that is consistent with the
objective set forth below.
- is capable of being used and enjoyed for purposes of informal and
unstructured recreation and relaxation, and
- is legally and practically accessible to the residents of the development
out of which the required open space is taken, or to the public if the area is
dedicated to the City.
- is not an area used to fulfill landscape or buffer requirements.
6-1.1.4 The City will provide development incentives to preserve significant vegetative
communities and other natural resources through impact fee credits and innovative design.
6-1.1.5 Homeowners' associations shall have the maintenance responsibility for
neighborhood parks.
6-1.1.6 Because population growth results in the degradation and reduction of natural
systems, all new development shall share in the acquisition and preservation of common
open space areas.
6-1.1.7 The City will continue to develop effective partnerships between the private and
public sectors to fund additional recreation facilities and programs.
6-1.1.8 The City shall require that environmentally sensitive open space areas be
designated as conservation easements with all development rights dedicated to the City.
6 - 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
6-1.1.9 Open space impact fees shall be used to ensure that 25% of the developed area
is designated as permanent open space, and that significant natural resources are
acquired and properly preserved.
6-1.2. OBJECTIVE: To determine the specific recreation facility and program needs of all
citizens of Oviedo.
Measure: By 1995 the City will survey the population to determine specific recreation
facility and program needs, and adjust the plans accordingly.
Policies:
6-1.2.1 The City will continue to require that recreational programs (not facilities) be
self-supportive through user fees, so that programs without demand are not continued.
Aid to low income groups, however, will continue, so that citizens who cannot afford the
programs are not denied service.
6-1.2.2 The City will monitor programs to ensure that the majority of users are City
residents, and that apparent needs are indeed needs of the citizens, instead of the area
in general.
6-1.2.3 The City will annually evaluate the facilities and programs in light of changing
population, lifestyle, and recreational needs.
6-1.2.4 The City will continue to work with private businesses and organizations to
subsidize programs for low-income residents.
6-1.3. OBJECTIVE: To develop and maintain a recreation and open space system that
will meet or exceed the following acreage and facility levels of service:
Park Acreage:
Neighborhood:
Community:
2 acres/1000 population
2 acres/1000 population
Minimum Facilities:
Tennis:
1 court /1000 population
or 1 lighted court per 5000
population
6 - 3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Basketball:
1 court /5000 population
Baseball!
Softball Fields:
1 field /2000 population
or 1 lighted field per 5000
population
Open Space:
25% of developed acreage
Measure: Existing park facilities and designated open space will be inventoried and
evaluated annually to insure that the adopted levels of service are maintained.
Policies:
6-1.3.1 The City shall use available funds to acquire recreation land in accordance with
the Comprehensive Plan whenever feasible so that surplus land is available for facility
development before future development limits availability and inflates prices.
6-1.3.2 If the annual review determines that there are existing or anticipated facility or
acreage deficiencies, the City will take one or more of the following actions:
a) Revise the 5 year Capital Improvement Program accordingly.
b) Re-evaluate the adopted levels of service.
c) Revise the Land Development Code to address the problem areas.
6-1.3.3 Recreation and Open Space Impact Fees will be evaluated and updated at least
every 5 years to ensure a funding mechanism for maintaining the established level of
service.
6-1.3.4 All development within the City of Oviedo shall conform to the established levels
of service. Residential development shall bear the responsibility of maintaining the
recreation level of service, but all development shall share in the responsibility of
maintaining the open space standard.
6-1.3.5 The City shall acquire at least 5 additional acres of park land by the year 2000.
6-1.3.6 The City shall continue to enforce the Land Development Code requirement that
all residential development provide recreation and open space area and facilities equal
to the neighborhood park acreage level of service.
6 - 4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
6-1.3.7 In designing new parks and upgrading existing parks, the City shall first consider
the minimum facility requirements and ensure that the level of service is met or exceeded
for the next five (5) year period.
6-1.3.8 The City shall provide technical assistance to Homeowners' Associations in
acquiring and developing additional park land and facilities.
6-1.4. OBJECTIVE: To coordinate public and private resources to meet recreation
demands is not included.
Measure: Private development shall provide and maintain the neighborhood park acreage
level of service standards and the City shall provide and maintain the community park
acreage level of service standard.
Policies:
6-1.4.1 The City will prepare a 5-Year Personnel, Maintenance, and Supply Program to
accompany the 5-Year Capital Improvements Program so that ancillary costs can be
evaluated when capital commitments are made.
6-1.4.2 The City's annual budget will cover the operation and maintenance costs
associated with the facilities required to meet the adopted level of service.
6-1.4.3 The City will continue to pursue state, federal, and other available funds to improve
the recreation and open space facilities.
6-1.4.4 The City will continue to collect user fees for funding recreational programs and
facilities, and charge higher fees for non-residents who are not supporting the
development, operation, and maintenance of the facilities through impact fees and
property taxes.
6-1.4.5 The City will continue to pursue and implement joint-use agreements with
the Seminole County School Board for public school facilities.
6-1.4.6 The City will continue to seek financial support for various programs from
private businesses and service organizations.
6-1.4.7 The City and the private sector shall share in the responsibility of meeting
the facility LOS standard through the continued development of neighborhood and
community parks.
6-1.4.8 School recreational facilities shall be included in the City's facility inventory
if a formal use agreement has been executed.
6 - 5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
6-1.5. OBJECTIVE: To ensure public access to fresh water beaches and shores.
Measure: By 1995, the City will complete the development of Round Lake Park.
Policies:
6-1.5.1 The City will continue to pursue acquisition of additional property along
Round Lake to protect this natural resource and provide public access to one of the few
water bodies within the City.
6-1.5.2 The City shall require that lakefront developments provide common lake
access available to at least the neighborhood residents.
6-1.5.3 The City may adopt restrictive boating regulations so that public use does
not adversely affect the water quality of the resource,
REC-GOAL
6 - 6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
o
INTERGOVERNMENTAL
COORDINATION
I
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION
GOALS. OBJECTIVES. AND POLICIES
7.1 GOAL: TO ENSURE THE SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THROUGH COORDINATION WITH NEIGHBORING
JURISDICTIONS AND AGENCIES PROVIDING SERVICES WITHIN THE CITY OF
OVIEDO.
7 -1.1. OBJECTIVE: To resolve potential conflicts with Seminole County regarding
annexation, land use, and service issues.
Measure: By 1993 the City will execute a joint plannin'g agreement with Seminole County.
Policies:
7-1.1.1 The City and the County shall evaluate land uses for potential annexation areas,
and agree on future designations. The agreed-upon designations for the future land uses
shall be incorporated into the City's Long Range Future Land Use Plan.
7 -1.1.2 The City shall renegotiate the agreement with the County prior to approving any
annexation outside of the area covered by the joint planning agreement.
7-1.1.3 The City and County shall designate specific water and sewer service areas.
7 -1.1.4 The City shall include comparable levels of service in any "first response"
agreement for emergency services.
7-1.1.5 The City shall continue to implement its inter-local agreement with Seminole
County to provide development approval information, and shall supplement that agreement
by providing the county copies of the concurrency Management Annual Report.
7-1.2. OBJECTIVE: To assist the Seminole County School Board in properly planning
for future educational needs of the City by evaluating potential impacts of proposed
projects on the local school system and exchanging information on a regular basis.
Measure: The City shall adopt consistent development review criteria for determining
school system impacts and level of service standards consistent with those of the School
Board within six months of adoption by the School Board.
7 - 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I,
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
7 -1.2.1 The population trends resulting in increasing K-12 public school enrollment should
be recognized as a critical factor in planning for current and future school system needs.
7 -1.2.2 The City shall request that each municipality have a representative on the Capital
Outlay and Housing Committee of the School Board.
7-1.2.3 The City shall work with the School Board, the County, and the other
municipalities to form a Planning Technical Committee to assist in planning future facilities
and locations.
7 -1.2.4 The City shall endorse the formation of a planning task force to address funding
and planning alternatives.
7-1.2.5 The City shall encourage and support the adoption of impact fees for school land
acquisition and facility construction.
7-1.2.6 The City shall encourage the Seminole County School Board to adopt a 5-year
capital improvement plan that is financially feasible and consistent with the population and
land use projections of Seminole County and its municipalities.
7-1.2.7 The City of Oviedo shall amend its Land Development Code to coordinate the
efficient provision of public educational facilities concurrent with the development
impacting such facilities by requiring proposed development requests to analyze the
existing capacities and levels of service, to project future impacts, and to submit proposed
construction schedules for future dwelling units.
This information shall then be forwarded to the School Board in accordance with Policy
2.10.2.8 The City of Oviedo shall work with the Seminole County School Board to develop
standards for the acquisition of potential school sites and to adopt specific levels of service
for elementary, middle, and high schools.
7 -1.2.8 The level of service standard for schools shall not be part of the concurrency
management system until a county wide assessment and implementation process has
been developed to compensate for variable attendance zones and capacities.
7 -1.2.9 The City shall provide the School Board with a monthly report on housing and
development activity within the City beginning January, 1992.
7-1.3. OBJECTIVE: To avoid litigation and resolve conflicts with local governments and
regulatory agencies through mediation and prevention.
7 - 2
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
'J
I,
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
Measure:
a) The City shall use the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council's informal
mediation process prior to litigation with other local governments or state and federal
agencies. I
b) By 1992 the City shall form a permanent citizen and staff advisory committee to
recommend policies and procedures for maintaining coordination between agencies and
local governments.
7-1.3.1 The City shall review the Comprehensive Plans of Seminole County and the City
of Winter Springs prior to the adoption hearings in order to identify potential impacts and
conflicts.
7-1.3.2 The City shall address impacts and conflicts in the following manner:
a) The City Staff shall first meet with the staff of the affecting government agency.
b) If the issue is not resolved, the City Council will file a formal, written objection.
c) If no compromise is reached, the City will either drop the objection or seek
mediation.
7-1.3.3 The City agrees to participate in a mediation process if other governments or
jurisdictions object to Oviedo's actions.
7-1.3.4 The City shall continue to notify affected governments and agencies of
development proposals under review.
7-1.3.5 The City shall continue to require that other jurisdictional permits be submitted prior
to permitting any construction within the City.
7-1.4. OBJECTIVE: To minimize multi-jurisdictional impacts.
Measure: By 1992 the City shall amend the land Development Code to require a
multi-jurisdictional impact analysis for major projects.
7 - 3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
a) Land Use
Policies:
7 -1.4.1 The City shall evaluate existing and future land uses of adjacent jurisdictions prior
to approving development plans to ensure compatibility and maintenance of adopted level
of service standards.
b) Transportation
7 -1.4.2 By 1993 the City of Oviedo shall adopt an interlocal agreement with Seminole
county to mutually agree on future land uses, urban services, and development standards
for the Seminole County Expressway interchange areas.
7-1.4.3 By February 1,1992, the City shall adopt criteria for determining vested rights of
previously issued development orders. Said criteria shall be consistent with FS Chapter
163-3167(8).
7-1.4.4 The City shall continue to serve on the Seminole County Concurrency
Management Task Force to ensure a comprehensive review of transportation issues.
7-1.4.5 The City shall continue to require that County and/or State driveway permits be
acquired and submitted to the City prior to issuing any building or site development
permits.
c) Housing
7 -1.4.6 The City shall continue to participate with Seminole County in the administration
of Community Development Block Grant funds and programs.
7 -1.4.7 The City shall continue to support Seminole Self-reliant Housing with technical
assistance and fee reductions and waivers when necessary.
d) Wastewater
7 -1.4.8 The Joint Planning Agreement with Seminole County will include designated
service areas for wastewater service.
7 -1.4.9 The City shall coordinate with the City of Winter Springs to ensure that adequate
wastewater service capacity is available for the franchise area, and that the utility is aware
of approved development plans within that franchise area.
7 - 4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
7-1.4.10 Areas outside of the City limits shall not be prevented from participating in a
water reuse program if there is a surplus supply of non-potable water.
e) Solid Waste
7-1.4.11 The City shall continue to be responsible for the collection, separation, and
delivery of solid waste to the Osceola Landfill and shall coordinate with Seminole County
to ensure proper disposal.
7-1.4.12 The City shall continue to provide and improve recycling programs to conform
to State mandates.
f) Drainage and Natural Groundwater Aquifer
7 -1.4.13 The City shall continue to require that SJRWMD permits be acquired and
submitted to the City prior to the issuance
of building or construction permits.
7-1.4.14 The City shall continue to serve on the Seminole County Stormwater Utility Task
Force to recommend implementation strategies for a County stormwater utility.
g) Potable Water
7-1.4.15 The City shall request notification from SJRWMD of any Consumptive Use Permit
applications that could affect the City's water supply.
7 -1.4.16 The City shall maintain its current interlocal agreement with Seminole County to
mutually cooperate in the provision of water service capacity by each reserving 175,000
GPD for the others use.
7 -1.4.17 The City shall coordinate with Seminole County, Orange County, Osceola County
and the St. John's River Water Management District (SJRWMD) to protect the
Econlockhatchee River basin by adopting an ordinance regulating development within that
basin. Said ordinance shall be adopted by 1992.
7 -1.4.18 The City shall establish a water quality monitoring program for the Econ River
by 1993, but shall also seek assistance and participation from SJRWMD, FDER, and
Seminole County to avoid duplication of efforts and to ensure consistent, coordinated data
collection and analysis throughout the system.
7 - 5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
7 -1.4.19 The City shall continue to require wetlands evaluation from SJRWMD prior to
development approval.
h) Conservation
7 -1.4.20 The City shall coordinate with Seminole County, Orange County, Osceola County
and the St. John's River Water Management District (SJRWMD) to protect the
Econlockhatchee River basin by adopting an ordinance regulating development within that
basin. Said ordinance shall be adopted by 1992.
i) Recreation and Open Space
7 -1.4.21 The City will continue to pursue and implement joint-use agreements with the
Seminole County School Board for public school facilities.
j) General
7-1.4.22 The City shall encourage the Planner's Committee of the ECFRPC to consider
using common data, providing a technological interface among jurisdictions, and
exchanging planning, development, and regulatory information on a regular basis.
7-1.4.23 The City of Oviedo shall provide potable water, transportation, recreation,
wastewater, drainage, and solid waste services within the City as delineated within the
Comprehensive Plan and provide information on these services in a Concurrency
Management Report to be issued annually.
7-1.5. OBJECTIVE: To coordinate the City Comprehensive Plan and the impacts of
proposed development with other units of local government providing services and with
the Comprehensive Plan of adjacent cities, the County, and adjacent counties.
Measure: The City shall review the comprehensive plans for Winter Springs and Seminole
County, monitor proposed revisions, and propose any modifications necessary to
accommodate anticipated impacts.
7-1-6. OBJECTIVE: To ensure coordination in establishing LOS standards for public
facilities with any state, regional, or local entity having operational and maintenance
responsibilities for such facilities.
7 - 6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Measure: The City level of service standards shall be the same as those established by
the state, regional, or local entity having operational and maintenance responsibility for
said facility unless there is an overriding public health, safety, or welfare concern to do
otherwise.
Policies:
7-1.6.1 The City's annual report provided through the Concurrency Management System
shall also indicate the level of service standards adopted by any state, regional, or local
entity having operational and maintenance responsibilities for facilities within the City.
7 -1.6.2 The City shall document the reasoning or overriding public health, safety, or
welfare concern that justifies any deviation from level of service standards set by the
responsible entity.
(INTERGOV)
7 - 7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
GOALS. OBJECTIVES. AND POLICIES
INTRODUCTION: The Capita/Improvements Element outlines a fiscal plan for the City
to finance the capital improvements recommended in the Parks and Recreation Element,
the Potable water Element, the Wastewater Element, the Drainage Element, and the Traffic
Circulation Element. All elements that required an adopted level of service are included
in the Capital Improvements Element, except for Solid Waste. Solid Waste is not included
because the City bears no fiscal responsibility in maintaining this level of service.
Seminole County must fund all capital improvements related to Solid Waste. The Five
Year Plan does not include any capital improvements for Parks and Recreation because
there are no improvements required through 1996 to meet the adopted level of service
standards.
The five-year plan included in this element is the adopted 5 Year Capital Improvement Plan
for the City and any designated bond issues shall be initiated in accordance with this plan.
8-1 GOAL: TO MAINTAIN A FINANCIALLY FEASIBLE PLAN FOR PROVIDING THE
INFRASTRUCTURE REQUIRED TO MEET THE ADOPTED LEVELS OF SERVICE FOR
EXISTING AND FUTURE POPULATIONS.
8-1.1. OBJECTIVE: To accurately assess the capital facility needs and related costs.
Measure: Projected capita/ facility needs shall be derived using the population and land
use data from the Short Range Land Use Plan.
Policies:
8-1.1.1 The City shall annually update and revise projected needs and costs as part of the
annual budget process.
8-1.1.2 The City shall annually evaluate the Comprehensive Plan to ensure that the
adopted levels of service can be maintained. If deficiencies are discovered, adjustments
will be made to the land use plan, the five year CIP and/or the definition of acceptable
service.
8-1.1.3 The City shall annually evaluate development and growth rate assumptions to
odetermine if more or less capital improvement is required.
8 - 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
8-1.1.4 The Capital Improvements schedule shall comply with the locational and other
applicable requirements of the Future Land Use Element and with the goals, objectives,
and policies of all elements of the Comprehensive Plan.
8-1.2. OBJECTIVE: To manage the Land Development and capital improvement planning
process so that new capital facilities and expansions necessary to meet and/or maintain
adopted levels of service are adequately funded in an financially feasible 5-Year Capital
Improvements Plan.
Measure: The City shall annually evaluate and update its 5-Year Capital Improvements
Plan to ensure the following: .
a. That all included capital improvements are consistent with the following
ranking standards:
first priority to items which threaten the public health or safety;
second priority to correction of existing deficienci~s;
third priority to replacement or updating of obsolete or worn-out
facilities;
fourth priority to prevention of deficiencies expected from previously
issued development orders;
fifth priority to items needed for LOS maintenance related to future
growth;
AND
b. That dedicated funding sources are available for all new capital
improvements related to LOS maintenance.
Policies:
8-1.2.1 A 5 Year Capital Improvement Plan, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan shall
be adopted as part of each annual budget.
8 - 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
8-1.2.2 The City shall maintain adequate reserves to fund replacement of worn-out
facilities by incorporating the effects of depreciation in the determination of user fees and
charges.
8-1.2.3 By April 1, 1992, the City shall implement a concurrency management system
consistent with the requirements of 9J-5.0055 FAC to ensure that development orders and
permits are issued in a manner that will assure that the necessary public facilities and
services will be available to accommodate the impact of that development.
8-1.2.4 Future development shall bear its full fair share of the cost of facility improvements
and expansions directly attributable to its impact through impact fees, user fees, capacity
fees, special benefit assessment/taxing district and other legally available means.
8-1.2.5 Public facility needs shall not exceed the City's ability to fund and provide public
facilities.
8-1.2.6 The City shall pursue grants or private sources for additional funding of Capital
Improvements.
8-1.2.7 The City shall limit the maximum ratio of outstanding general obligation
indebtedness to no greater than 15% of the property tax base.
8-1.2.8 By 1992 the City shall adopt a stormwater utility ordinance to provide a funding
mechanism for drainage improvements.
8-1.2.9 The City shall consistently revise all user fees to maintain adequate reserves and
cover operation and maintenance costs.
8-1.2.10 If additional funds are available and no scheduled improvements are eliminated,
or delayed, projects may be moved forward or added to the current fiscal year without an
amendment to the Comprehensive Plan.
8-1.2.11 The Annual Report of the concurrency management system shall be used to
prepare and update the 5-Year Capital Plan in order to evaluate the capacity needs and
availability.
8-1.2.12 the City shall ensure the availability of public facilities to serve developments for
which development orders were issued prior to the adoption of the comprehensive plan by
analyzing committed and vested development and accounting for those capacity needs in
the Annual Report of the Concurrency Management System.
8 - 3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
8-1.3. OBJECTIVE: To maximize efficiency and effectiveness in providing public facilities.
Policies:
8-1.3.1 The City will coordinate with Seminole County and with the School Board to ensure
that adequate infrastructure is efficiently provided for public health care and educational
facilities.
8-1.3.2 The City shall assess the impacts of individual facility improvements/expansions
on all types of infrastructure.
8-1.3.3 The City will coordinate with other jurisdictional agencies to ensure that all share
in providing infrastructure in proportionate share to benefit.
8-1.3.4 The City shall continue to expend funds to maintain existing facilities and services
at their existing capacity and level of service.
8-1.3.5 The City shall not expend funds to extend public facilities into high hazard areas
or any other areas when such extension will encourage development in conflict with the
goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
8-1.4. OBJECTIVE: To coordinate land use decisions and fiscal resources with a
schedule of capital improvements which maintains adopted level of service standards and
meets existing and future facility needs.
Measure: By April, 1992, the City shall implement a concurrency management system that
reviews all land use decisions and determines consistency with the Comprehensive Plan
in accordance with 9J-5-5055(2) FAC.
Policies:
8-1.4.1. No final development order will be issued unless there is available capacity to
maintain the following LOS standards concurrent with the impact of the development:
a. Water:
350 gaJlons/day/ERC for all development (equivalent service may be
provided with individual wells only with City Council approval.
8 - 4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
750 GPM at 20 PSI residual pressure fire flow for single family residential
areas.
1250 GPM at 20 PSI residual pressure fire flow in all other developed areas.
b.
Wastewater:
300 gallons/day/ERC in central sewer service areas.
c.
Roads: (CPA-95-1: Ord No. 936; 5/15/95; Amended 7-19-93)
Commuter routes:: LOS E as defined by the current version of the FDOT
Generalized Guidelines.
All other roads: LOS D as defined by the current version of the FDOT
Generalized Guidelines.
Constrained and backlogged facilities: additional peak hour volume due to
new development along constrained facilities shall not exceed 15 percent of
1991 traffic counts unless acceptable mitigation measures are provided to
ensure that the LOS is not degraded more than 15 percent. Current traffic
volumes are stated in the support document for this Comprehensive
Development Plan.
Seminole Greeneway: LOS "C" as defined by the current version
of the FOOT Generalized Guidelines.
d.
Drainage:
Treatment and disposal shall meet design and performance standards in
Section 17-25-025 and 17-25-033 of Chapter 17-25 FAC.
Treatment of the first inch of run-off on site shall meet water quality
standards of Chapter 17-302, Sec. 17-302.500 FAC.
Discharge of facilities shall not degrade receiving waters below the minimum
conditions for the designated use of its classification as established in
Chapter 17-302 FAC.
The design storm standard shall be the 25 year/24 hour storm event for
systems with positive discharge and the 25 year/4 day event for systems
without positive discharge.
8 - 5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
e. Solid waste:
5.14 PCD at the Osceola landfill.
4.49 PCD at the Central Transfer site.
f. Recreation and open Space:
Park Acreage:
Neighborhood:
Community:
2 acres/1000 population
2 acres/1000 population
Facilities:
Tennis:
1 court per 1000 population
or 1 lighted court per 5000 population
Basketball:
1 court per 5000 population
Baseball/Softball:
1 field per 2000 population or 1
lighted field per 5000 population
Open Space:
25% of developed acreage.
8-1.4.2 Available capacity concurrent with the impacts of development shall be determined
in accordance with the following:
a. For potable water, sewer, solid waste and drainage:
the necessary facilities and services are in place at the time the permit is
issued, or
the permit includes a condition of approval that the necessary facilities and
services will be in place when the impacts occur, or
the necessary facilities are under construction at the time the permit is
issued, or
the necessary facilities are guaranteed to be in place when the impact occur
in an enforceable agreement that includes provisions of Rules 9J-5-
0055(2)(a)1-3, FAC.
b. Parks & Recreation
any of the provisions included under Policy 4.2(a) or
8 - 6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
the necessary facilities are the subject of a binding, executed contract which
provides for the commencement of actual construction of the required
facilities within one year of the issuance of the permit, or
the necessary facilities are guaranteed in an enforceable development
agreement that requires commencement of the actual construction of the
facilities within one year of the issuance of the permit.
c. Roads.
any of the provisions of Policy 4.2 (a), or (b) or
the City has committed to provide the necessary public facilities in
accordance with a financially feasible 5-Year Capital Improvement Program
consistent with the .requirements of 9J-5.0055(2)(c).
8-1.4.3 By February 1, 1992, the City shall adopt criteria for determining vested rights of
previously issued development orders. Said criteria shall be consistent with FS Chapter
163-3167(8).
8-1.4.4 Beginning April 1, 1991, the City shall annually review the Short Range Land Use
Plan, the 5-Year Capital Plan and maintenance of adopted levels of service.
8-1.4.5 The Long Range Land Use Plan and all capital recovery or impact fees shall be
evaluated at least every 5 years.
8-1.4.6 No amendment to the Short Range Land Use Plan shall be approved without an
evaluation of the 5-Year Capital Plan and adherence to all adopted levels of service.
8-1.4.7 A review and analysis of its fiscal policy compliance with the Comprehensive Plan
shall be included with the City's Annual Budget.
8-1.5. OBJECTIVE: To ensure that development bears an equitable, proportionate share
of the cost of providing new or expanded facilities.
Measure: By April 1, 1992, the City shall update its transportation and parks and
recreation impact fees to be consistent with the adopted LOS standards, and adopt capital
recovery fees to finance the future water and sewer improvements required to maintain
adopted LOS standards for future development.
8 - 7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
8-1.5.1 The City shall annually evaluate whether anticipated revenues are covering the
costs associated with new development.
8-1.5.2 The City shall continue to require developer dedications and contributions for site-
specific required improvements.
8-1.5.3 The City shall investigate the use of special benefit assessment/taxing districts and
other mechanisms to allow development to pay its "fair share" of improvements.
CAP.IMP
8 - 8
-
-
00
I
\0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
..
-
-
-
-
-
TABLE K.1
FIVE YEAR SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
(in I,OOO's)
;}~~~~~;~~~;~Tili~:~gj, r~I,j"~~~~1~~~:~~;~r3:t)~:~dt~1~;~~:;~~~Fj; [I~~~i;';~;~~1~~tB}1:'I~~1~:~:i;~1t~t~J:),,;:j~~h~~~11:f~[~~f~~it~2:~2~,~
,.,91-92:"',1<,/,.,';5,92,93;,; ',;,', ".., 93;94di\'ojd
Transportation 0 0 0 0 700 2400 1100 0 0
Lockwood Blvd. South 200 Developer
Commitment
Division Avenue 700 2000 Impact Fees
State Grant
Local Connections 200 Imoact Fees
Kingsbridge Connection 200 Developer
Commnment
Westgate Collector 900 Imoact Fees
Water
1548 929.5 407 949,6 0 0 0 0 0
CR 419 Loop: Stephens SI. to 355 New Revenue Bonds
Lockwood Blvd.
Clonts Street 15 Develooer Contribution
W, Mnchell Hammock Loop 70 New Revenue Bonds
CR 419 Loop: Lockwood Blvd, to Live 419 Developer Contribution
Oak Plantation
SR 434 Extension: Alafaya Woods Blvd. 107 Developer Contribution
to Chapman Road
New Wells, Raw Water Main & Plant 600 494 UliIny Reserves
Imorovements
Ground Storage Tank 350 New Revenue Bonds
1 Million Gallon Elev, Water Tank 300 931 New Revenue Bonds
Doctors Drive 30 Utilnv Fees
Maple Avenue 8 UliInv Fees
Sodium Hydroxide System 120 New Revenue Bonds
Misc. Eauloment 16.5 18.6 Utility Fees
Wastewater 841 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 0
Lift Station 1 & Servie FM 841 I I I I I Impact or Capnal Recovery Fee
Svstem Uoorades I I 501 I I I UliInv Fees
Dralnalle 41 208 134 177 369 0 0 0 0
Clark Street 16 Utilnv Fees
Maple Street (B-14 & B-15) 43 Utilnv Fees
Pine Avenue & Broadway Street (B-23) 26 Utility Fees
Clark Street & S.R. 426 IS.8) 65 Utilitv Fees
Broadwav & Central (S-9 & S-13) 286 UliInv Fees
SI. Johanna Drive (S-22) 60 83 UliInv Fees
Sweetwater Creek & Magnolia (S-25) 195 Utilitv Fees
Stephen SI. (E-2E) 117 UliInv Fees
Franklin Street & Ave. B (S-17) 13 Utilitv Fees
Misc. System Impvt. 2.5 Utilitv Fees
Mise, Equipment 22.5 UliInv Fees
Amended 5-15-95; CPA 95-1; Ord, 936
-
-