Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997 10 27 Regular Item B COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM B REGULAR X CONSENT INFORMATIONAL October 27. 1997 Meeting MGRnEPr:y.~ Authorization REQUEST: The Community Development Department - Planning Division requests the City Commission to hold a public hearing to approve the first reading for adoption of Ordinance 675 to establish the "New Development Area" Overlay Zoning District Regulations (Design Guidelines) of the State Road 434 Corridor Vision Plan PURPOSE: The purpose of this Board Item is to request the Commission to approve the first reading for adoption of Ordinance 675 establishing the "New Development Area" Overlay Zoning District Regulations (Design Guidelines) that would become a part of Chapter 20 "The Zoning Ordinance" of the code of Ordinances of the City of Winter Springs. NOTE: Shadings and underlining represent additions to the text, while strikethrough represents deletions to the text. APPLICABLE LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY: The provisions of 163.3167(11) which states "Each local government is encouraged to articulate a vision of the future physical appearance and qualities of its community as a component of its local comprehensive plan. The vision should be developed through a collaborative planning process with meaningful public participation and shall be adopted by the governing body of the jurisdiction." In 1995 the City Commission approved the preparation ofa S.R. 434 Corridor Vision Plan that would include a "New Development Area". OCTOBER 27,1997 REGULAR AGENDA ITEM B Page 2 CONSIDERA TIONS: * The S.R. 434 Corridor Vision Plan was presented to the May 20, 1995 Visioning Workshop with representatives of the City Commission, Planning & Zoning Board, other boards, and the public in attendance. At the workshop a graphic depiction of the three subareas of the S.R. 434 Corridor was presented showing the "Redevelopment Area", the "Town Center", and the "New Development Area". There was agreement on the need for division into three (3) areas. * The Planning & Zoning BoardlLocal Planning Agency completed its review of the S.R. 434 Corridor Design Guidelines for the New Development Area on October 2, 1996. * The City Commission held workshops on the draft Design Guidelines for the "New Development Area" of the State Road 434 Corridor Vision Plan on December 9, 1996, January 6 and 20, 1997. Additional workshops were held on February 4th, March 3rd, and April 21st, 1997. * The City Commission approved the first reading of Ordinance 675 to establish the "New Development Area" Overlay Zoning District Regulations (Design Guidelines) on August 25, 1997. * The City Commission at its September 8, 1997 meeting tabled consideration of the second reading and adoption of Ordinance 675 to establish the "New Development Area" Overlay Zoning District Regulations until the September 22, 1997 meeting, in order to allow an opportunity for land owners and staff to attempt to resolve differences in the regulations. The City Commission at its September 22nd meeting tabled consideration of the second reading until its October 13, 1997 meeting. * The Design Guidelines will become the text of the New Development Area Overlay Zoning District to be incorporated into Chapter 20 the "Zoning Ordinance" of the City. * The City Commission adopted Ordinance 670 at its July 28, 1997 meeting creating a "New Development Area" Overlay Zoning District, and to direct staff to develop a comprehensive plan amendment and zoning change that would be in accordance with the New Development Area Design Guidelines for the State Road 434 Corridor Vision Plan. * NOTE: A first reading of Ordinance 690 to exclude Missey Casscells' property from the "New Development" Overlay Zoning District will be considered at the October 27, 1997 City Commission meeting. OCTOBER 27,1997 REGULAR AGENDA ITEM B Page 3 FUNDING: FINDINGS: * The City Commission, at its September 8, 1997 meeting, deferred consideration of the second reading and adoption of Ordinance 675 to establish the "New Development Area" Overlay Zoning District Regulations (Design Guidelines) until its September 22nd meeting. At the September 22nd meeting, the City Commission tabled consideration of the second reading and adoption of Ordinance 675 until the October 13th meeting. * Due to substantial changes suggested by the City Attorney to the "New Development Area" Overlay Zoning District Regulations, the City Commission will hold a first reading of Ordinance 675 on October 27, 1997. No funds are required for creation of the New Development Area Overlay Zoning District Regulations. * The Planning & Zoning Board completed its review of the "New Development Area" Design Guidelines on October 2, 1996, and recommended approval to the City Commission with changes. These changes were incorporated into the draft sent to the City Commission at its first workshop on the Design Guidelines for the New Development Area. * The City Commission completed its review of the "New Development Area" Overlay Zoning District Regulations (Design Guidelines) on April 21, 1997. RECOMMENDA TION: Staff recommends approval of the first reading of Ordinance 675 to establish the "New Development Area" Overlay Zoning District Regulations (Design Guidelines), which will become a part of Chapter 20 of the Code of Ordinance of the City of Winter Springs. IMPLEMENTA TION SCHEDULE: The City Commission would hold a second reading and public hearing on November 10, 1997 and adopt Ordinance 675 to establish the "New Development Area" Overlay Zoning District Regulations of the State Road 434 Corridor Vision Plan. The ordinance would immediately take effect upon adoption per 166.041(4) Florida Statutes and Section 4.15 of the City Charter. OCTOBER 27, 1997 REGULAR AGENDA ITEM B Page 4 ATTACHMENTS: L Ordinance 675. 2. S.R. 434 Corridor New Development Area Overlay Zoning District Regulations (dated October 19, 1997) 3. Memo from Mike Wadley to Tom Grimms on Review of Letters from Schrimsher Properties dated September 5, 1997 and September 15, 1997. 4. Memo to Mayor and Commission from City Manager, dated October 20, 1997, concerning Schrimsher Letters. COMMISSION ACTION: ORDINANCE NO. 675 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA ESTABLISHING THE STATE ROAD 434 CORRIDOR VISION PLAN "NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA" OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS TO BECOME PART OF CHAPTER 20 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, 163.3167 (11), Florida Statutes, encourages local governments to articulated a vision of the future physical appearance and qualities of its community. " . . . , WHEREAS, the City, in accordance with 163.3167(11) F.S. has developed a collaborative planning process with meaningful public participation in the development of the concept and design guidelines of the S.R. 434 Corridor Vision Plan New Development Area Overlay Zoning District; WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Board/Local Planning Agency has reviewed the concept and design guidelines for the New Development Area Overlay Zoning District and has recommended to the City Commission adoption of same; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED that the City Commission of the City of winter Springs, Florida, institutes the State Road 434 "New Development Area" Corridor Overlay Zoning District Regulations to become a part of Chapter 20 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Winter Springs, and that shall apply to the following properties: ALL PROPERTIES (INVOLVING THE ENTIRE PARCEL) LYING WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS ADJACENT TO THE STATE ROAD 434 RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM HAYES ROAD EASTWARD TO STATE ROAD 417 (AKA THE GREENEWAY) WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE TOWN CENTER OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT OF THE STATE ROAD 434 CORRIDOR VISION PLAN, AND THE PROPERTY OWNED BY CASSCELLS AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 2 EAST OF WEST LINE OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 21 SOUTH, RANGE 31 EAST, EXTENDED NORTHERLY TO SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 20 SOUTH, RANGE 31 EAST. WEST 1/3 OF 1 OF 5, PHILIP R. YONGE GRANT, PLAT BOOK 1, PAGES 35 TO 38, SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 21 SOUTH, RANGE 31 EAST. LAST 1/3 OF WEST 2/3 OF LOT 5, PHUILIP R. YONGE GRANT, PLAT BOOK 1, PAGES 35 TO 38, SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 21 SOUTH, RANGE 31 EAST. EAST 1/3 OF LOT 5, PHILIP R. YONGE GRANT, PLAT BOOK 1, PAGES 35 TO 38, SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 21 SOUTH, RANGE 31 EAST. NORTH 3/4 OF LOT 14 LESS WEST 1,000 FEET OF PHILIP R. YONGE GRANT, PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 35 TO 38, SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 21 SOUTH, RANGE 31 EAST, AND ALL OF LOT 21, NORTH OF STATE ROAD 419, LESS THE WEST 1,000 FEET OF SAID PHILIP R. YONGE GRANT. LOTS 13, 15,20, AND LOT 19 NORTH OF OVIEDO STATE ROAD NO. 419, AND OF PHILIP R. YONGE GRANT ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 38 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA. ALL IN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 21 SOUTH, RANGE 31 EAST. LOTS 10 AND 9 OF THE PHILIP R. YONGE GRANT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 35, OF THEPUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, IN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 21 SOUTH, RANGE 31 EAST. LOTS 11 AND 17 OF THE PHILIP R. YONGE GRANT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE35, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, IN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 21 SOUTH, RANGE 31 EAST. LOT 12, PHILIP R. YONGE GRANT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 36, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY ON WEST. LOT 16, LESS ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 21 SOUTH, RANGE 31 EAST, PHILIP R. YONGE GRANT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 36, PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOT 18 AND THAT PART OF LOT 19 LYING NORTH OF SANFORD-OVIEDO PAVED ROAD, SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 21, RANGE 31 EAST OF THE PHILIP R. YONGE GRANT AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGES 35 TO 38 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA. [See accompanying map "(REVISED) STATE ROAD 434 CORRIDOR VISION PLAN - NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA" dated October 20, 1997) SECTION I SEVERABILITY. If any provision or portion of this Ordinance is declared by any court of competent jurisdiction to be void, unconstitutional, or unenforceable, then all remaining provisions and portions of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION II EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall immediately take effect upon adoption, with a quorum present and voting, by the City Commission of the City of Winter Springs, Florida, this 8th day of September, 1997. PAUL P. PARTYKA, MAYOR CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS ATTEST: MARGO HOPKINS, CITY CLERK CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS FIRST READING POSTED SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING C~:"J, . 'I.q,~ :.Hn:i ';1 . Nord. ( REVISED) STA TE ROAD 434 CORRIDOR VISION PLAN NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA ..... .- -- ---.... ,\ -.....1 ~::;-)::.:.:.:.::. ..-.........., ::-r.:-.: ::::.:.:,... __e. '_"_ 1:1 j' October 20, 1997 CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS S.R. 434 CORRIDOR VISION PLAN NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA Revised per City Commission meeting October 13, 1997 October 19, 1997 New Development Area S.R. 434 CORRIDOR VISION PLAN: LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ARTICLE VI. S.R. 434 CORRIDOR VISION PLAN DIVISION 1. S.R. 434 CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT Sec. 20-445 Intent. The purpose and intent of this specialized overlay zoning district is to encourage and provide for enhanced property development within the S.R. 434 commercial corridor. Some of the objectives to be attained through the establishment of this district include: enhancement of the commercial status of the corridor; reduction of visual distraction through uniform sign criteria; enhancement of physical appearance through increased landscaping of public and private property; provision of architectural design guidelines to create a unifying theme over time; protection of adjacent residential land uses; and maintenance of property values. Sec. 20-446 Creation. In addition, to and supplemental to, other zoning and land development regulation requirements heretofore and hereafter, the S.R. 434 Corridor Overlay District includes additional regulations to promote the orderly development and redevelopment of the corridor, of which shall be applied through imposition and mapping of an overlay district. The regulations are in addition to and not in substitution of the underlying zoning district regulations which shall also remain applicable to the overlay zone. The overlay district design standards will govern development within the corridor and will control where conflicts between regulations occur. DIVISION 2. GENERAL DESIGN STANDARDS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT AREA Sec. 20-447 i.::P:bH'gij:il!ni:!jtq Deso iption of New Development Overlay Zoning District. mfig:j~9ngl~gg:j:&.~~~gg:::$t.?nfi..~rq$::'$ij~J.t::~PPl.Yj!f!.Q the New Development Overlay Zoning District Wn1PR includes all properties adjacent to the S.R. 434 right-of-way from Hayes Road eastward to S.R. 417 (the GreeneWay) except for the Town Center Overlay Zoning District along S.R. 434. Sec. 20-448 Building Height. No building shall exceed five (5) stolies 01 fifty five (55) feet in height. For the purpose of these design standards, building height shall be measured from ground level to the highest point of the coping of a flat roof or the mean height level between eaves and ridge for gable, hip or gambrel roofs. Sec. 20-449 Setbacks. (1) No improvement shall be located on any property closer to any property line than the minimum setbacks set forth below: October 19, 1997 1 New Development Area S.R. 434 Collector Street Internal Street Side Rear Buildings 50 feet 35 feet 15 feet 1 0 feet 1 0 feet Parking 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 5 feet 5 feet (2) The narrowest dimension of a lot adjoining a road right-of-way shall determine its front for the purpose of establishing yard requirements. (3) On corner lots, the front yard shall be considered as abutting the street upon which the lot has its least dimension. The rear lot, in this case, shall be opposite the front yard. (4) The following structures are specifically excluded from the setback restrictions: a. Steps and walks. b. Landscaping and landscape berms. c. Planters three (3) feet in height or less, or d. Other improvements as may be permitted under applicable regulations of the City. The €1ty Board of Adiustment will consider any request for the placement of such other improvements within a setback, only after a Development Review Committee review and recommendation. In determining whether to recommend City consent, the Development Review Committee may consider, without limiting the scope of their review, the following: (1) the extent to which any hardship exists that would justify a variance from the normal setback requirements; (ii) the aesthetics of the proposed improvements and their visibility from common roads and adjacent properties; (iii) the consent or objections of adjacent property owners; and (iv) the nature and use of the proposed improvements. It is the owner's burden and responsibility to provide such information and documentation as may be requested by the Development Review Committee in order to justify to the Development Review Committee that the intrusion of additional improvements within the normal setbacks is beneficial to the corridor and will not adversely affect adjacent property owners. Sec. 20-450 Land Coverage. No parcel within the S. R. 434 Corridor Overlay District shall have more than 75% of its area impervious. In determining land coverage, a water body shall not be considered an impervious surface. October 19, 1997 2 New Developmen1 Area Sec. 20-451 OfT-Street Parking and Driveway Requirements. (1) Paved Driveway and Parking Spaces: All driveways and parking spaces shall be paved with asphaltic concrete and/or concrete and shall be curbed. (2) On-Site Parking: All parking areas shall be on-site and shall be adequate to serve all employees, visitors and company vehicles. (3) Rights-Of-Way: Parking is prohibited on rights-of-way or along driveways. (4) Parking Space Size: Each off-street parking space shall be a minimum of two hundred (200) square feet, 101 x 20', in addition to space for access drives and aisles. The minimum width of each space shall be ten (10) feet. The two (2) foot area of paving at the end of each parking space may be omitted provided the area is landscaped with sod or another acceptable ground cover. The two (2) foot landscaped area shall not be counted toward any other greenspace requirement or setback. Lines demarcating parking spaces may be drawn at various angles in relation to curbs or aisles, so long as the parking spaces so created contain within them the rectangular area required. (5) Handicapped Spaces: Handicapped spaces shall be provided and sized in accordance with 316.1955, 316.1956, 316.1958, 320.0843, 320.0845, 320.0848 Florida Statutes. (6) Access drive Width: Each access drive shall have a minimum width of twenty-four (24) feet. (7) Number of Access Drives: If a site has less than two hundred (200) feet of frontage on a right-of-way, one (1) access drive shall be permitted unless there is a joint access drive, in which case two (2) may be permitted. If a site has more than two hundred (200) feet of frontage on a right-of-way, F.D.O.T permit guidelines (found in 1496-7 Florida Administrative Code) and restrictions shall apply. (8) Turning Radius: The minimum turning radius shall be thirty (30) feet. (2) Coordinated ioint use of parking areas during off-peak hours shall be encouraged to be incorporated into the design of projects to reduce the total number of required parking spaces. (lQ) Whenever practical. vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems shall be separated. A system of multi-purpose walkways and bicycle patl15 connecting buildings, common open spaces, recreation areas. community facilities and parking areas shall be provided and adequately lighted for nighttime use. The intent is to create a pedestrian oriented system to connect all properties within the New Development Area. October 19, 1997 3 New Developmen1 Area Sec. 20-452 Landscaping. The following landscape standards establish the minimum criteria for the development of the roadways, parking areas, and other features to ensure continuity in aesthetic values throughout the corridor. (1) All areas requiring landscaping shall meet or exceed the following general landscape requirements. Such Landscaping Requirements are required for: a. That part of the site fronting a public or private right-of-way that is within the designated corridor. b. Around and within all off-street parking, loading and other vehicular use areas within each site. c. Along the outside of screening walls and fences. d. Adjacent to buildings on the site to complement the architectural style. (2) All landscaping shall be installed according to accepted commercial planting procedures. Fertile soil, free oflime rock, pebbles or other construction debris shall be used in all planting pits. (3) The owner of a site shall be responsible for all landscaping so as to present a neat, healthy and orderly appearance free of refuse and debris. Any dead or dying plant material, including sod, shall be promptly replaced or shall be treated to restore healthy growth to achieve a uniform appearance. (4) All landscape areas shall be adequately irrigated with reclaimed water based on the following criteria: a. An automatic sprinkler irrigation system shall be provided for all landscaped areas. b. The irrigation system shall be designed to provide full coverage of all landscaped areas and shall be equipped with rain sensors. c. The irrigation system shall be designed and operated to prevent or minimize run-off of irrigation water onto roadways, driveways, and adjacent properties not under the control of the owner of the site. d. The irrigation system shall be maintained so as to be in optimum working order at all times. (5) All plant material shall meet or exceed standards for Florida No.1 plants, as specified in Grades and Standards for Nursery Plants. Parts I and II. 1973 published by the State of October 19, 1997 4 New Development Area Florida, Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. Trees shall be selected from the Recommended Tree Pallet found at the end of these design standards. (6) The preservation and utilization ofa site's natural trees and shrubbery is strongly encouraged. Existing vegetation shall be incorporated into the landscape concept for a site wherever practical. (7) Natural growth may be used to satisfy specific landscape requirements. Relocation of on- site landscaping material is encouraged. (8) When an access way intersects a right-of-way, landscaping may be used to define the intersection provided however that all landscaping within the triangular area described below shall provide unobstr.~~.t.~~.~.r.l:)~.s.~yi.s.i?i.li.ty..~~.~.~.~y~l.~~.t.yv.~~.I1.~~<>...<~>..r.~et and six (6) feet above finished grade. ~m!.~$.ld~R::~{~t~\Wi~k:~::rri'~yli#~Q$~:::tn@::~f!:?9.gplgf:::~r~i::: Landscaping, except grass and ground cover, shall not be located closer than three (3) feet from the edge of any access way pavement. The triangular area shall be defined as: a. The areas of the site on both sides of an access way which lie within a triangle formed by the intersection of each curb of the access way with the street right-of-way with two (2) sides of each triangle being ten (10) feet in length from the point of intersection and the third side being a line connecting the ends of the two (2) other sides. b. The area of the site located at a corner formed by the intersection of two (2) or more streets with two (2) sides of the triangular area being measured thirty (30) feet in length along the right-of-way lines from their point of intersection; and the third being a line connecting the ends of the other two (2) lines. (9) All landscape plans and specifications shall be prepared by a landscape architect licensed to practice in the State of Florida. (10) For office buildings. office parks and mixed-use developments Not not less than twenty-five (25%) percent of the overall site shall be planted with a combination of trees, shrubs and ground covers. For commercial sites and commercial sites within mixed-use developments, not less than fifteen (15) percent of the site shall be planted with a combination of trees, shrubs and ground covers. Land preserved in its natural state may be used to satisfy this requirement. Also, lakes and stormw~ter management systems may be used to satisfy this requirement if designed as an amenity;: (11) All parking areas and vehicular use areas shall be screened from the public right-of-way by a landscape screen. This screen may be composed of a berm not less than three (3) feet in height and not more than five (5) feet in height or a maintenance free wall at least three (3) feet in height, or a screen oflandscaping at least three (3) feet in height twelve months after planting. If a wall or hedge is used, a meandering berm a minimum of one and one-half foot in height, with a maximum slope of 3: 1 shall be required. Berms shall not be used where October 19, 1997 5 New Development Area coverage conflicts with existing vegetation. This screening requirement may be combined with other requirements within the landscape easement. Berm slopes shall vary in order to provide visual interest; however, the maximum slope shall be 3: 1. The berms shall be completely covered with grass or other living landscape materials. A berm shall not be constructed around existing vegetation where the grade will be raised more than six (6) inches. Walls and shrub screens shall be setback a minimum of 10' from the property line. (12) Concrete walkways shall be constructed adjacent to the right-of-way. The walkways shall be a minimum five (5) feet wide and shall meander to create visual interest. The construction of the walkways shall be coordinated with adjacent properties to ensure continuity of design. Where a sidewalk intersects a street or driveway, a curb ramp shall be installed. (13) Landscaping shall be provided between vehicular use areas and the abutting properties as follows: a. A hedge or other durable landscape screen at least thirty (30) inches in overall height above grade when planted, to grow to thirty-six (36) inches within twelve (I 2) months under normal growing conditions, shall be used between the common property lines. When two (2) hedges occur along a common property line, use of the same plant species is required. If a hedge exists on an adjacent property along a common property line, a duplicate hedge is not required; however, in all cases, tree planting requirements for each property shall apply. b. Live screening material shall be planted in areas not less than six (6) feet in width. Planting areas shall be mulched a minimum of two (2) inches thick with cypress mulching or other organic mulch. c. At least one tree shall occur for every seventy-five (75) linear feet, or fraction thereof, along side (non-street side) and rear property lines. These trees shall be any canopy tree selected from the recommended plant pallet found at the end of this section. (14) Landscaping shall be provided for all vehicular use areas so as to provide visual and climatic relief from broad expanses of pavement and to channelize and define logical areas for pedestrian and vehicular circulation. The requirements for landscaping in vehicular use areas are as follows: and shall include at least one (1) canopy tree. (a) Parking areas shall include landscaped curbed islands at the ends of each row of parking. These islands shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet wide and as deep as the combined parking space(s) plus median, if any and shall include at least one (1) canopy tree. (b) Each parking bay shall have no more than ten (10) twenty (20) continuous parking spaces unbroken by a landscape island. October 19, 1997 6 New Development Area (c) Parking 12m tots shall have a maximum of 40 cars roUI l.undl ed (400) cars. Where total parking requirements for a parcel exceed 40 400 cars, parking lots shall be broken into distinct areas separated by continuous landscaped islands at least five ill fifteeh (15) feet wide. Landscaped islands shall contain one (1) tree for every thirty (30) linear feet of island. (d) Each separate required landscaped island shall contain a minimum of one hundred sixty-two (162) square feet with a minimum interior dimension of nine (9) feet and shall include at least one (1) tree. W As an option. a six (6) foot wide landscaped island may be constructed between rows of parking which shall count towards the required open space. If this option is used the parking spaces abutting the island may be shortened to nineteen (19) feet in length and the unbroken rows of parking may be extended to twenty (20) spaces. The landscaped island shall contain one tree for every thirty (30) linear feet of island. (15) A landscaped unpaved area shall surround each building, occurring between the facade of the building and paved areas whether a parking area, drive or sidewalk as described below. Paving may be allowed up to the facade of a continuous storefront building if landscaping is provided intermittently along the facade of the building. (a) Along the front and side ofa an office building a minimum landscaped area often (10) feet for the first floor plus three (3) feet for each additional floor shall be maintained. Sidewalks are not considered part of the landscaped area. (b) Along the rear ofa an office building a minimum offive (5) feet oflandscaped area shall be maintained. Loading areas may be permitted along the rear or side facade of a building. (16) Foundation and accent planting shall be provided around all structures for the purpose of enhancing and complementing the architectural character of the structure. (17) Additional greenspace and landscaping shall be required at access drives. (18) Drainage retention areas required on individual sites shall be sodded and designed to blend with the overall landscaping and landform of the site and may be included in the twenty-five (25%) percent landscaped area. In no case shall designs be permitted which include fencing. (19) All stormwater management areas shall conform to the design criteria promulgated by the City of Winter Springs and the St. Johns River Water Management District. (20) Prior to any site clearing activities all existing trees required to remain by the Design Review Committee shall be tagged in the field for inspection and approval. Barriers shall be erected at the dripline of trees for protection against construction activities. October 19, 1997 7 New Development Area (21) Any existing tree(s) indicated to remain on construction plans approved by the Review Committee that are damaged or removed shall be replaced with new tree(s) of at least foUl (4) two al1d one-llalf(2.5") illc1.es in calipel eadl (Iueasuled tlllee (J) feet above.s.I~~~X.a.I.d ~i.~~ii.~I~~~::~:~:~;~~t~~:~:;~~:~~:fR~~~~t.~~~~.~!B~~~I:~:~B.~~~:~Qi~:i~if~~~h~:~~~s ). ggn~J.~l~n~ (22) All areas not otherwise landscaped, including the right-of-way, shall be sodded with St.Augustine solid sod by parcel owners. Other suitable sod may be permitted in low visibility areas or areas subject to periodic water inundation. au A walkway with a minimum width of 5 feet, shall be constructed to connect the main public entrance door of a building to the public walkway along rights-of-way. Where the walkway crosses parking or an access drive. specialty pavil.~ (ie. bl ick. pavel blocks, stal11ped cOllclete) the walkway shall be delineated. used to delilleate tIle walkway A landscaped area a minimum of nine (9) feet in total width shall separate the walkway from parking spaces. The use of architectural features and landscaping is encouraged to define pedestrian gateways. If shrubs are used in the landscaped area along walks. they shall be setback so as not to form a "wall" along the edge of the walk. (Ed The word "total" was added after the reference to nine (9) feet to clarify that this is the total width of the landscaped walkway, not five (5) plus nine (9) feet on either side.) Sec. 20-453 Buffet.s and Walls. (a) Buffers: A minimum fifteen (15) foot landscape buffer shall be provided by the developer/property owner abutting the designated right-of-way lines at the time of development order or permit approval. The landscape buffer may be contained within a landscape easement. (1) The developer/property owner shall be responsible for the purchase, installation, maintenance and irrigation of all required landscaping. (2) This area shall be planted with live oaks or other deciduous trees with a minimum four t47 two and one-half (2. 5 ") inch caliper and overall height of16 feet at time of planting no closer than five (5) feet from the back of the right-of-way line. The trees shall be planted every fifty (50) feet. A minimum of four (4) sub-canopy trees and two (2) deciduous trees per one hundred (100) feet of frontage or fraction thereof shall be planted in and about the buffer. Plantings should be naturalistic rather than formal in order to blend with the natural landscape. (3) No existing or dedicated public or private right-of-way shall be included in calculation of the buffer widths. (4) Stormwater retention areas may be permitted in the corridor buffer area subject to the following: October 19, 1997 8 New Development Area (a) No more than 60% of the corridor buffer area can be used for stormwater retention; (b) Stormwater retention areas shall be naturalistic in shape, dry, sodded, and designed to blend with the overall landscape theme and landform; ( c) Stormwater retention areas may be wet if designed to be part of a water feature; (d) Designs which require fencing shall be prohibited; and (e) No slope shall be greater than that indicated in Sec. 9-241 (d)(1) and (2) City Code. (5) Existing vegetation shall be used where possible to meet these requirements. (b) Walls: All freestanding walls, sound barriers, ground sign enclosures, planters, man-made structures fronting along the designated roadway or its major intersections shall be of brick, decorative or split-faced concrete block. When these materials are used for a visual screen, they shall conform to the architectural style, materials, and color of the development. Sec. 20-454 Signs. All signs and sign elements, including shape, form, lighting, materials, size, color and location shall be subject to approval by the Design Review Committee if such signs or sign elements are visible from adjacent properties or a street right-of-way. (a) Ground Mounted Multi-Tenant or Project Identification Sign: For each multi-tenant development under separate ownership, one (1) wide-based monument style 01 pylolI, permanent sign with landscaped base identifying the name of the development and businesses within the development shall be permitted. For developments with five (500) feet of frontage or more on a major road, one (1) additional sign may be permitted. The minimum separation for all signs on an individual ownership parcel shall be 200'. (1) Shall only advertise the name of the commercial development companies, corporation or major enterprises within the commercial development. The primary address of the building shall be incorporated into the sign with numerals/letters a minimum of eight (8) inches in height, but the address shall not be counted against allowable copy area. (2) Shall be located no closer than fifteen (15') feet from front, side, or rear property lines. (3) Shall have a maximum of two (2) faces. (4) Shall be consistent in design, format and materials with the architecture of the proposed building(s). October 19, 1997 9 New Developmen1 Area (5) A wall sign shall not be higher than eight (8) feet above the closest vehicular use area. (6) Signs shall be in an enclosed base a minimum width of two-thirds the width of the sign. Landscaping shall be incorporated around the base to include low growing shrubs and ground cover and/or annuals to promote color. (7) Signs shall be in accordance with the following schedule: Building Size (Gross Floor Area) Under 75,000 square feet 75,000 - 250,000 square feet over 250,000 square feet Maximum Copy Area Maximum Height 32 square feet 12 feet 48 square feet 14 feet 64 square feet 16 feet (8) Multi-tenant centers are permitted additional signs for anchor tenants according to the following schedule: Building Size (Gross Floor Area) Under 75,000 square feet 75,000 - 250,000 square feet over 250,000 square feet Anchor Tenant Additional Signs 2 of 12 square feet 3 of 12 square feet 4 of 12 square feet An anchor tenant is defined as the major retail store(s) in a center that is in excess of 100' front foot and a minimum area of 10,000 square feet. (b) Ground Mounted Single-Tenant Identification Sign: One (1) wide-based monument style or pylon; permanent project identification sign shall be permitted per single-tenant parcel. One additional permanent wide-based monument style 01 pylol1 project identification sign may be permitted for parcels in excess of one (1) acre with more than one (1) ingress/egress serving more than one (1) building. The minimum separation for all signs on an individual ownership parcel shall be 200'. (1) Shall only advertise one (1) person, firm, company, corporation or major enterprise occupying the premises. (2) Shall be located no closer than fifteen (15) feet from the front, side or rear property lines. (3) Shall not exceed two (2) faces. (4) Sign copy area shall not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet per face. For parcels in excess of 4.0 acres, the project identification sign face may be increased to forty-eight (48) square feet. (5) Shall be consistent in design, format and materials with the architecture of the proposed building. October 19, 1997 New Development Area 10 (6) The sign shall not be more than eight (8) twelve (12) feet in height above the closest driveway or vehicular use area. (7) Signs shall be in an enclosed base that is at a minimum the full width of the sign. Landscaping shall be incorporated around the base to include low growing shrubs and ground cover and/or annuals to promote color. (c) Building Mounted Multi-Tenant Identification Sign for Buildings with Separate Exterior Tenant Entrances: In addition to the ground mounted identification sign, tenant signs shall be permitted on the exterior walls of the building at a location near the principal tenant entrance, and be consistent with the following criteria: (1) Shall only advertise one (1) person, firm, company, corporation or major enterprise occupying the premises. (2) The sign(s) shall be clearly integrated with the architecture of the building. Shall be consistent in design, format, and materials with the architecture of the proposed building. (3) The sign(s) shall not project above any roof or canopy elevations. (4) Wall signs shall display only one (1) surface and shall not be mounted more than six (6) inches from any wall. (5) When more than one (1) tenant sign is used on one (1) building, each tenant sign shall be consistent in size, materials, and placement. (6) The maximum size of sign letters and logos, including any sign backgrounds, shall be 24" in height for individual tenants other than anchor tenants. The maximum height of letters and logos for anchor tenants in a retail center shall not exceed 25% of the building height. An anchor tenant is defined as the major retail store(s) in a center that is in excess of 100' front foot and a minimum area of 10,000 square feet. (7) The length of the sign may occupy up to seventy (70%) percent of the linear feet of the storefront the business occupies. The anchor tenant may have the signage permitted for a Building Mounted Single Tenant Identification Sign. (8) For office buildings, one wall sign not exceeding two (2) square feet shall be permitted identifying an individual tenant. The sign shall be located adjacent to the building entrance. (d) Building Mounted Single Tenant Identification Sign: In addition to the ground-mounted identification sign, a building mounted identification sign may be permitted consistent with the following criteria: October 19, 1997 11 New Development Area (1) Shall only advertise one (1) person, firm, company, corporation or major enterprise occupying the premises. (2) The identification sign is located on the exterior wall of a building. (3) The sign shall be clearly integrated with the architecture. (4) The sign shall not project above any roof or canopy elevations, and the top of the sign shall not be higher than fourteen (14) feet above the main entry floor. (5) The sign shall display only one (1) surface and shall not project more than six (6) inches from any wall. (6) Signs shall conform to the following schedule: Building Size (Gross Floor Area) Maximum Copy Area Maximum Letter Height 2 feet 25% Height of Building 25% Height of building Less than 50,000 square feet 50,000 to 100,000 square feet 16 square feet 32 square feet Over 100,000 square feet 48 square feet (e) Additional Signs/Variances: Under special circumstances, such as for parcels on corner lots, additional signs consistent with these design standards may be approved, upon a request granted by the Board of Adjustment purslJ.~.t1t..~~.~.ec. 20-82 and 20-83 or the City Code. The Board of Adjustment shall cOllsidel r~gm:m~hq variances of this sign code in specific cases where such variances will not be contrary to the public interest and where, owning to special conditions, a literal translation of this sign code would result in unnecessary hardship. All requirements, procedures, findings and appeals of sign code variances shall follow those provisions for zoning variances. (f) Commercial Outdoor Advertising (i.e. Billboards) Off-site advertising signs such as billboards are prohibited. (g) Changeable Copy Signs: In order to create continuity throughout the corridor all changeable copy signs shall be as follows: (1) The sign cabinet shall be all aluminum extrusion or better as approved by staff Changeable copy signs may be incorporated into permitted signs and shall be included as part of the permitted sign area as described below: a. Changeable copy signs shall not comprise more than twenty-five (25) of the permitted sign area; October 19,1997 12 New Developmen1 Area b. Movie theaters and other performance/entertainment facilities may utilize up to 80% of the permitted sign area for display of films, plays or other performances currently showing. Such copy area shall be included as part of the permitted sign area. c. Movie theaters may use up to 80% of permitted wall sign area for display of names, films, plays or other performances currently showing. d. One changeable copy sign advertising the price of gasoline is permitted on gasoline station sites provided it shall not exceed 12 square feet per sign face. (2) The sign face shall be acrylic Pan X 15 or Equal. (3) The letters and track shall be Wagner Zip-Change or Equal. (h) Backlit Signs: Backlighting of sighS, illcludillg awning signs, shall be prohibited pellllitted. (i) Window Signs: Window signs may be permitted under special circumstances for retail establishments such as signs inside and on a window or in a display of merchandise when incorporated with such a display. The total area of all window signs, shall not exceed twenty (20%) percent of the window glass area to be calculated separately for each separate storefront. Window signs shall count against total allowable copy area if they are permanently attached. (j) Construction Signs: One (1) construction sign, denoting the owner, architect, landscape architect, engineer, financial institution, contractors, or containing any statement pertaining to project for which a building permit has been obtained, will be permitted during construction. The construction sign shall not exceed sixty-four (64) square feet in area and shall not exceed fourteen (14) feet in height or width. The construction sign shall be removed from the site by the owner upon substantial completion of all construction, or upon the issuance of a final Certificate of Occupancy, whichever is sooner. If the sign is not removed when required, it may be removed by the City at the owner's expense. (k) Marketing Signs (e.g. "Space for Rent" sign): (1) Only one (1) marketing sign shall be permitted on each parcel during the building's "leasing period". At the end of the leasing period, marketing signage shall be removed from the site by the owner of the site. (2) All marketing signs shall be submitted to the City for approval and location prior to the sign's installation. (3) Marketing signs shall be set back a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet from the front, side and rear property lines. They shall not create a visibility obstruction to vehicular traffic. October 19, 1997 13 New Development Area (4) For parcels in excess offive (5) acres or with frontage on more than one (1) road, one (1) additional marketing sign may be permitted. Signs must be a minimum of200' apart. (5) Marketing signs may be double faced. Sign faces shall be parallel and mounted on the same poles. The copy area shall not exceed sixty-four (64) square feet and no more than ten (10) feet in height. (6) Marketing signage may be incorporated within the construction signage, but the signage shall not exceed sixty four (64) square feet in area. (7) Marketing signs may be lighted so as to illuminate the lettering on the sign. (I) Political Signs only by permit. (m) Prohibited Signs: The following signs and/or devices are prohibited in the corridor. (1) Any sign or part of a sign which is designed, devised, or constructed so as to rotate, spin, gyrate, turn or move in any animated fashion. Signs shall not inco.~p()~~~~.HHHH.HHH f~M~:W~a.~tii~~~~~;~:jB.~~ili.t.1:~fl~&~1gB.l~ii~~i~~~~i:~tiOn 0 r neon. ~~~gt.fgn!;9.:::g~!~~ (2) Any sign painted directly on any exterior wall. (3) Signs projecting more than six (6) inches in depth. (4) Roof signs. (5) Bench signs. (6) Snipe signs (e.g. signs attached to trees and poles). (7) Freestanding signs unless otherwise provided for herein. (8) Trailer signs. (9) Signs attached to temporary structures. (10) Billboards (11) Any vehicle with a sign or signs attached thereto or placed thereon with three exceptions as follows: (a) any vehicle when parked or stored within the confines of a building, or (b) any vehicle upon which is placed a sign identifying a firm or its principal product if such vehicle is one which is operated during the normal course of October 19, 1997 14 New Development Area business and shall be parked in the least visible spot from the road, or ~ a trailer placed on a job site during construction. (12) Pole signs. (13) Balloon signs. (14) Ribbon signs. (m) Permanent Flags: Only project flags or governmental flags shall be permitted in conformance with the following standards:' (1) One (1) flagpole and one (1) flag may be permitted per parcels of two (2) acres or more. (2) The maximum width from top to bottom of any flag shall be 20% of the total distance of the flag pole. (3) Flagpoles shall maintain the same setback requirements as project identification signs. (4) Flagpole heights shall be between twenty (20) and (35) feet in height above grade. (5) A project flag shall only contain information permitted on the project identification sign. A project flag shall be submitted to the Development Review Committee for approval. (n) Temporary signs for special events. (1) Permits for temporary signs, such as pennant and banner signs, not otherwise prohibited are allowed for such purposes as auctions, special events, notice of opening of new businesses, and going out of business sales. Permits for temporary signs shall authorize the erection of the signs and maintenance thereof for a period not exceeding fourteen (14) days; and permits cannot be renewed on the same sign, nor shall another temporary permit be issued on the same location, within 90 days from the date of expiration of any previously issued temporary permit. (2) Signs for specific events shall be removed within two (2) working days after conclusion of the event. A freestanding temporary sign shall be no larger than a maximum of thirty-two (32) square feet, and may be double sided. Banner signs may be sized to extend across roads. (0) Maintenance: All signs and associated apparatus shall be maintained by the owner of the site. Violations shall be processed through the City's Code Enforcement Division. October 19,1997 15 New Development Area (P) Nonconforming Signs. (1) Any sign, other than billboards, having an original cost in excess of one hundred ($100) dollars and which is nonconforming as to permitted sign area or any other reason which would necessitate the complete removal or total replacement of the sign, may be maintained a period offrom one (1) to five (5) years from the effective date of these design standards. The term of years to be determined by the cost of the sign or of renovation, including installation cost, shall be as follows: Sign cost or Renovation Cost Permitted Years from Effective Date of Design Standards $101 to $1,000 $1,001 to $3,000 $3,001 to $10,000 Over $10,000 $.::g::M~$. ~lQQ:Q $.::J.:;:QQ:lg@::$.::m:Q~gQQ @ 3.: t Z 3- 5 (2) Any owner of a sign who desires to rely upon an amortization period longer than three (3) years shall file with the City within one (I) year from the effective date of these design standards, a statement setting forth the cost and date of the most recent renovation, and a written agreement to remove or bring into conformance the nonconforming sign at or prior to the expiration of the amortization period applicable to that sign. The maximum period to amortize a sign shall be five (5) years. ill Violations shall be subject to Chapter 2. Article 3. Division 2. Code Enforcement. City of Winter Springs Code of Ordinances. Sec. 20-455 Utility Lines. All new or relocated utility lines within the designated corridor shall be constructed and installed beneath the surface of the ground unless it is determined by the City that soil, topographical, or any other compelling conditions, make the underground installation of such utility lines as prescribed herein unreasonable and impracticable. (1) It shall be the developer's responsibility on-site to make the necessary arrangement with each utility in accordance with the utility's established policy. (2) The underground installation of incidental appurtenances, such as transformer boxes, switch boxes, pedestal mounted boxes for the provision of electricity shall not be required. However, such appurtenances where not rendered impractical by the determination of the City shall be installed on the site of any development approved after the adoption of this section. The necessary easements to allow the utility company access and service to such appurtenances shall be dedicated to the service provider by the developer prior to issuance of a building permit. October 19, 1997 16 New Development Area (3) All transformers and switch boxes related to development approved after the adoption of this section shall be set back a minimum offifteen (15) feet from any right-of-way and visually screened using landscape materials or masonry construction in conformance with these land development regulations. Sec. 20-456 Corridor Access Management. (a) A system of joint use curbed driveways and cross access easements shall be established wherever feasible along the S.R. 434 Corridor and the building site shall incorporate the following: (1) A cross access corridor extending the entire length of each block served to provide for driveway separation (consistent with the access classification system and standards). (2) A design speed of 10 mph and sufficient width to accommodate two-way travel aisles designed to accommodate automobiles, service vehicles, and loading vehicles. (3) Stub-outs and other design features to make it visually obvious that the abutting properties may be tied in to provide cross-access via a service drive. (4) A unified access and circulation system plan that includes coordinated or shared parking areas is encouraged wherever feasible. (b) Shared parking areas shall be permitted a reduction in required parking spaces if peak demand periods for proposed land used do not occur at the same time periods. (c) Pursuant to this section, property owners shall: (1) Record an easement in the public records allowing cross access to and from other properties served by the joint use driveways and cross access or service drive; (2) Record an agreement in the public records that remaining access rights along the thoroughfare will be dedicated to the City of Winter Springs and pre-existing driveways will be closed and eliminated after construction of the joint-use driveway. (3) Record a joint maintenance agreement in the public records defining maintenance responsibilities of property owners. (d) The City Engineer may reduce required separation distance of access points, except as provided in (f), where they prove impractical, provided all of the following requirements are met: (1) Joint access driveways and cross access easements are provided where feasible in accordance with this section. October 19, 1997 17 New Development Area (2) The site plan incorporates a unified access and circulation system in accordance with this section. (3) The property owner shall enter a written agreement with the City of Winter Springs, recorded in the public records, that pre-existing connections on the site will be closed and eliminated after construction of each side of the joint use driveway. (e) The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) has established minimum spacing requirements for the Greeneway (S.R. 417) Interchange Area. (f) In the design of a system of joint use driveways and cross access easements, building sites involving garage doors and bays associated with any use within the district shall be located perpendicular to S.R. 434. Sec. 20-457 Building and Screening Design Guidelines (1) Projects are el1COUI aged to shall use a val iet}! of materials consistent with materials used in the area. Acceptable materials include stucco, concrete block, reinforced concrete with tile, and brick and terra cotta accent material. Inappropriate materials are river rock, unfinished timber (unpainted), shake roofs, reflective/mirror glass, and metal siding. Materials should be high quality and well crafted. (2) Mechanical equipment and appurtenances, including but not limited to air con~.i~ioner units, ventilation equipment, refrigeration systems, heating units, illcinel atol y Ullits ,~tg;' must be screened so that they are not visible from any public right-of-way. The screen shall consist of a solid wall, facade, parapet or other similar screening material which is architecturally compatible and consistent with the associated building. Such screening material shall extend at least one (1) foot above the object to be screened. Iflandscaping is utilized, the plantings must be high enough within one year of planting to provide a screen which will screen the entire unit. witll a IllinilllullI of sevellty-five (75%) pel eel It opacity. In the case of satellite dishes, they shall be screened from view from ground level of adjacent rights-of-way and properties by buildings, dense landscaping or screen walls. The Development Review Board may permit dishes on buildings if no part of the dish is visible from the ground of surrounding properties. Setbacks for antennas and satellite dishes shall be the same as the building setbacks. unless otllerwise 011 tile .MillilllUllI Setback Requirelllents Table # 1. (3) Dumpsters and similar facilities shall be screened on all four (4) sides from public view. Both sides and the rear of such facilities shall be screened by an opaque concrete wall, or similar material. Dumpster shall be placed in an area that is least visible from a public right- of-way. October 19, 1997 18 New Development Area (4) All storage areas shall be screened from view from the right-of-way and from adjacent residential zoning districts. Screening enclosures may consist of any combination of landscaping and opaque building materials. Ifbuilding materials are utilized, such material shall be consistent with the architectural design of the principal structures. (5) Side and rear elevations of buildings visible from a public street or adjacent property shall be designed in the same architectural style as the main facade. (6) All doors for service entrances or bays shall not face a public street unless they are screened to obscure service activities. (7) Outparcels shall conform to the architectural, sign age, and landscape theme of the overall project and must share an internal access with the overall project. (8) Newspaper, magazine and other such vending machines shall be encased in a structure that is architecturally compatible and consistent with the adjacent building and other site details and must meet building setbacks. (9) Exterior lighting shall be a cut-off light source to protect adjacent properties from glare. All exterior lighting shall be consistent and compatible throughout the project. (10) Buildings with multiple storefront entries are encouraged to incorporate overhangs in the design offront facades as appropriate to promote pedestrian activity. (11) Backflow preventers and other above ground valves shall be screened so they are not visible from the street right-of-way using either landscaping or an opaque building material and shall be subiect to buffer setback requirements. (U) Drive-thru pick up windows shall not be permitted on the front or sides of a building fronting on S.R. 434. Sec. 20-458 Development Agreement Any developer may propose to enter into a developer's agreement with the City designed to set fo rth terms an~. .~.().n.~ i ~i.().~~ ,a.,pp f.? p'.r,i a..t~.~ ?.I!1 ~~t., ~~ ~.~i. r~.lI. ~.st.a..~~~~. '?f. .t.~.~., ~p.~~ifi~.. p'.r.(),p,? ~.~d October 19, 1997 19 New Development Area Sec. 20-459 Corridor Design Review Board. Th e Development Re.yi.e.~ ..<::()f!1l!li ~~ e.~. ~.~.~.Il.~e.r.:'~ ..~.s.. ~~~..<::<? r.r.i.~,<? r...J::).e.~.i~~ ..~~vi ew Board fo r developments in the ~:~w:Ji?@y~rQ;pni~rm::A!.r~~::Qi::Y~r!~Y::p'Q.nfQgfmJ~Mi.9.f@1:1D~ S.R. 434 Corridor and shall review such developments for a unifying theme accor.~i~~.t.()..~~e...~~s.i&.l1.~t.~~~~r.ds and i~.~~~iii]~;~~:f.~Kii~ii.~~;I:i:ii~i~~~;~~tt~~::;~:~~~~i.:nli~I~ljiii'I~I~lil~n! igf~:~m~p.!:::PY:ri~nl::!Q::j$.:~9.ngp':::gQf#~$,.$.:;~gf::HX,:~:::QQ~:@;:::j October 19, 1997 20 New Development Area DEFINITIONS: * Place/replace the following definitions in the Sec. 16-51 Definitions (Signs) in the City Code. '" Substitute this definition of "Sign" in place of the current definition found in Sec. 16-51 (page 957) of City Code: Signs - Signs shall mean all names, insignias, trademarks, and descriptive words, back- lit awnings or material of any kind affixed, inscribed, erected or maintained upon an individual site or upon any improvement on individual sites. * Substitute this definition of "Market ing/Rea I Estate Sign" in place of the current definition of "Real estate sign" found in Sec. 16-51 (page 957) of the City Code: MarketinglReal Estate - For the purpose of these design standards, marketing signs shall mean all names, insignias, trademarks, and descriptive words of material of any kind affixed, inscribed, erected or maintained upon an individual site or upon any improvement on individual sites which contain information relating to the marketing of space or building(s) on the subject parcel. * Add this definition of "Ground sign" in Sec. 16-51 (page 957) of the City Code: Wide-based monument or pylon style sign - a sign wholly independent of any building for support, consisting of a solid base with sign on top for monument sign or a base of foliage with sign immediately the level of the base foliage, and where the subject of the sign relates to either the identifying of the business name or the activity(s) carried on in the structure on the same property as the sign. * Add this definition of "multi-tenant development" to Sec. 20-1 of the City Code: Multi-tenant development - Shopping centers and other uses so determined by the City. October 19, 1997 21 New Development Area 10/20/1gg7 10:4g 407SgSg75S M SKILLING+SOLE DES PAGE 02 MEMORANDUM Date: Tom Grimrns Mike WOJlley~ October 20, 1997 To: From: Subject: Review of Letters from Schrimsher Properties dated September 5, 1997 and September 15, 1997. The comments/recommendations re: the New Development Area and Town Center Design Standards contained in the above referenced letters were reviewed. A number of the recommendations by Schrimsher Properties were adopted by the City Commission during the course of their review. The following are responses to the comments/recommendations contained in the letters. September 5, 1997 Letter: 1. It is not recommended that building setbacks from SR 434 be reduced from 50'. 2. It is not recommended that the size of parking spaces be reduced to 9'x18'. 3. Reducing the required green space below 25% was considered, The requirement for office buildings was kept at 25%. For conunercial buildings, the requirement was reduced to 15%. 4. No change is recommended to the height ofbemls. 5. No change is recommended to the width of islands in parking areas. 6. A design option was approved to allow up to 20 contiguous parking spaces without a landscape break. 7. No further changes are recommended for parking areas. 8. Landscaping requirements around buildings were changed to reflect a distinction between office and commercial buildings. 9. The replacement of trees was changed to be consistent with the City's Arbor Ordinance. 10. The width of connecting walkways was clarified and the requirement for speciality pavers for crossings was removed. 11. The caliper of canopy trees was reduced as recommended. 10/20/1997 10:49 4078989768 M SKILLING+SOLE DES PAGE 03 Memorandum Tom Grimms October 20, 1997 12. The wall sign referenced is an entry wall feature and not a building; therefore, the 8' height limit is appropriate. 13. The standards were changed to allow back lighting of signs but not awnings. No further changes to the sign section is recommended. 14. No change is recommended to the access management section. September 15, 1997 Letter: 1. No changes are recommended to be made to the size of parking spaces or parking areas. 2. In landscaped islands, the requirement does not state that canopy trees are required every thirty feet, only trees. Small trees are acceptable. 3 . We agree, and it is understood, that reclaimed water for irrigation is only required where available. 4. Damaged trees are to be replaced per the City's Arbor Ordinance. 5. References to pylon signs have been removed. 6. No further changes to the sign section are recommended. 10/20/1997 10:49 4078989758 M SKILLING+SOLE DES PAGE 04 (20) A tree survey shall be slJbmitted with any application for site plan review ~howini aU trees Q.ver 2" in caliper. Existing trees to be removed and ret~ned shall be shown on the site plan. Prior to any site clearing activities all existing trees required to remain by the Design Review Committee shall be tagged in the field for inspection and approval. Barriers shall be erected _.-..----.-At..th.e-.dJ~pUP~ .?~.!Tees for protection against construction activities. "- \ /,,""'- -".. .-...-.........,.. .,.......,.~. ... .. _...-._.._---_.__...._~........._.....__.,..,.."....,.... ......~.. 1) Any existing tree(s) indicated to remain on construction plans approved by the Review .........J Committee that are damaged or removed shall be replaced with new tree(s) of At least foOT (4) ihche~ in ca:lipel eAch (measured tmee (3) feet above grade) !11~ havi~ a tot41 tree c.tliper equivalent to that of the remov-ed ur dan1ased tree (~) conSistent WIth Chapter 5 ,i Section _~~~~~~~~~~:.~!~:~~,.~.p~n8s Code of Ordinanc.es. J.Jik~~~' ~ (22) All areas not otherwise landscaped, including the right-of-way, shall be sodded with b v . v St.Augustine solid sod by parcel owners. Other suitable sod may be permitted in low g ~ visibility areas or areas subject to periodic water inundation. N,J.M) 11t~( t~_ . Sec. 20-344 ButTers and Walls. (a) Buffers: A minimum ten (10) foot landscape buffer shall be provided by the developer/property owner abutting the S.R 434 right-of-way lines at the time of development order or permit approval. The landscape buffer may be contained within a landscape easement. (1) The developer/property owner shall be responsible for the purchase, installation, maintenance and irrigation of all required landscaping. (2) I~~,s..~.~~. s.~a,~~,.~~.'p'l~~~~.. ~t~.I~.v~..9~.s. o.~9,~h.~r. ~~c.i~~~u~..t.r.~~~..iil~~~~~In9.pyrll~ (fpi:[m,:rfjAA_nm;:~.:p.I:.t.;;t9.VAq:;~t::lfii-1Itq:iQ.f:;~Mi:~:;i~~~j with a minimum four (4) inch caliper and overall height of 16 feet at time of planting no closer than five (5) feet from the back of the right-oC-way line, The trees shall be planted every fifty (50) feet. (3) No existing or dedicated public or private right-of-way shall be included in calculation of the buffer widths. (4) Stormwater management areas may not occur in the buffer area. (b) Walls: All freestanding walls, sound baniers, ground sign enclosures, planters, man-made structures fronting along the designated roadway or its major intersections shall be of brick, decorative or split-faced concrete block. When these materials arc used for a visual screen, they shall confonn to the architectural style, materials, and COIOf of the development. Sec. 20.345 Signs. October 17, 1997 14 Rcdn-clopmarn Area CITY OF WINTER ~PRINGS, FLORIDA Ronald W. McLemore City Manager 1126 EAST STATE ROAD 434 WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA 32708-2799 Telephone (407) 327-1800 MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and Commission From: Ron McLemore, City Manager ff /vr-" Date: October 20, 1997 Re: Schrimsher Letters Based upon the issues that developed at the last Commission meeting, I have reviewed again the staffs review of the Schrimsher letters with the following comments: 1) All of Mr. Schrimsher's comments were reviewed prior to final submission of the documents to you for the last Commission meeting of October 13, 1997. 2) Staff has no recommendations for changes to the design guidelines. 3) In my opinion, Mr. Schrimsher will continue to object and debate because he simply does not agree with staff. However, it necessary that we move on. Adequate provisions have been made in the ordinance to negotiate variances to design standards when such variances are truly needed for the success of a development. 4) Again, my frustration is that staff met for months with Frank Schrimsher to work out the design standards that are in front of you, as amended by you own desires. It seems to me that Michael Schrimsher would accept the compromises that were worked out during that process. My recommendation to you is to adopt the ordinance as provided for the new development area with the changes included in my memo of October 10, 1997. RWM/jp '-., C1t~ ~ SCHRIMSHER PROPERTIES Septembcr 5, 1997 Mr. Ron McLcmore, City Managcr City of Winter Springs 1126 East S.R. 434 Winter Springs, FL 32708 RE: S.R. 434 Corridor Vision Plan: New Dcvclopment Arca dated May 21, 1997 Memorandwn from Margaret S. O. Casscells dated August 19, 1997 Dear Ron: Wlule we do not agree with everything in the above memorandum, therc are some issues on which we concur as well as other items to consider in the New Developmcnt Area Design Standards. Section 20-340 (1) - Most commcrcial development along S.R. 434 will want at Icast some parking in front of the building, so that the 50 foot setback \\~ll rarely bc a problem. However, it is possible that some office or retail user will prefer to bring their building forward and put all parking in thc rear and want a smaller front sctback. Pcrhaps provision should be made for a variance. Section 20-342 (4) - We agree that 10' x 20' is outdated and too large for a minimwn standard parking space size. We have suggested 9' x 18' without a provision for smaller compact spaces. The parking spaces at the new Winter Springs Post Office are 9 feet wide. An o\\ner would be free to make his parking spaces larger if it was desired or necded. In our experience, compact car O\\TIcrs park in full-size spaces aIid vice versa, creating wlple.asant situations that can't be prevented. Leaving 2 feet unpaved at the end of each space is a way to avoid paving an area beyond every parking block or curb that tires never touch. There is a cost savings and an increase in pervious area. However, the green space that is created is oflower quality depending on the intensity of use because cars and tmcks overhang the green space. Section 20-343 (l0) - Land preserved in its natural state, lakes and stormwater management systems may be included in the green space. However, 25 % still may be excessive in some situations. This deserves a little more research. (11) - Berms don't need to be over 3 feet high and aren't necded at all when a 3 foot hedge or wall has been providcd. (14)(a) - Landscapcd islands probably need to be at least 6 fcet wide to support a tree along with other plant materials. We have suggested a 9 foot width to match parking space width. The trees in the islands should not have to be canopy trees in all instances. Besides shade, trees provide a perch for birds to bomb vehicles and pede~trians. Also: retail users in commercial retail developments need visibility that certain trees obstmct. There sh9uld be flexibility in tree sclection. (14 )(b) - We think that 15 continuous spaces is a good compromise. However, it may be desirable to let this number vary depending on the width of landscaped islands. For example: 6 foot island with 10 spaces, 9 foot island with 15 spaces, or 12 foot island with 20 spaces. Some variety in design is attractive. 600 EAST COLONiAL DRIVE SUITE 100 ORLANDO. "LORIOA 32803 FAX 1407)648-9230 OFFICE 1407J 423-7600 ;. Mr. Ron McLemore September 5, 1997 Page 2 (14)(c) - We definitely agree that 40 cars per bay is much too low. This would carve larger developments into little quarter acre isolated pockcts and obstruct vehicular movement. Most cities and counties don't have any limit on parking bay size. We think that a fair compromise is in the range of 300 cars per bay with the continuous landscaped island in the 9 foot range. (The only green space that you might not get credit for is the optional 2 foot strip, which would total 800 square feet or less along 40 parking spaces.) (15) - We think a landscaped area surrounding each building is a good requirement, but allowance must be made for building access and signage visibility. Buildings with multiple store front entries are encouraged in Section 20-348 (l0) to incorporate overhangs in front facades to promote pedestrian activity, and it will be difficult to have both covered walkways and extensive landscaping. (21) - We agree that the larger caliper trees are much morc expcnsive and are unnecessary. Also, the larger trccs are more likely to die when transplanted. The City's arbor ordinance specifies 3 inches caliper measured D.B.H. as the minimum standard for trees although points are awarded for smallcr trces also. The City and a developer could agrec that smaller trces be planted in less visible areas and largcr ones be planted up front. (23) - Wc think that a connecting walkway is a good requirement, and stamped concrete is a Icss expensive alternative to bricks or pavers. There may bc other less costly options to highlight a pedestrian crossing such as plain concrete to contrast with asphalt drives. However, we think that 9 fcet is too wide for thc requircd landscape buffer, especially when parking spaccs could be located on both sides of the walkway resulting in a 23 foot wide corridor through the property. Perhaps 6 feet is a better requirement since it's wide enough to accommodate landscaping and the conidor would be eithcr 11 feet or 17 feet wide depending on whether parking was on one side or both sides. Section 20-344 (a)(2) - We agree that the minimum standard should be reduced perhaps to 2112" - 3" caliper and 10' - 12' height. Just as allowance is made for hedge materials to grow within the first year, so the properly planted and watered trees will grow. The cost savings are significant. Also, the Design Standards scem to require a total of 8 trees per 100 feet of frontage, which is excessive, when 3 or 4 is plcnty. Section 20-345 (a) - We think a landscaped base is fine for a growld mounted identification sign. The Design Standards allow for sign age on parcels with smaller frontagc and properly address spacing and the possibility of additional signage for large parcels. The wall sign 8 foot height restriction is much too low and doesn't belong in (a)(5). It should be omitted. (c)(3) says all that needs to be said. We agree that thc maximwn copy areas in (a)(7) and (a)(8) are much too restrictive. The heights are alright. The break point should be 150,000 square feet, not 250,000. Wc would recommcnd that you increase the maximwn copy areas to 64, 80 and 96 square feet respectively and allow each anchor tenant 16 additional square feet. (b)(6) We agree that the maximWJ1 height ofa ground mounted single tenant identification sign is too low and should be 10 or 12 feet for copy areas of 32 and 48 square feet respectively. We also agree the the maximum copy areas in (d)( 6) are extremely small, especially for retail and should be greatlv increased. Maximum letter height should be 30 inches or 25% of building height. (f) Although new billboards are prohibited, exisiting billboards should be dealt ,,~th on an individual basis. (h) Backlighting of signs should be permitted. .. Mr. Ron McLemore September 5, 1997 Page 3 (m)(2) You may want to allow for the possibility of a sign painted directly on an extcrior wall in some instances. (m)(l2) Prohibiting pole signs makes sense because the goal is to utilize moument style ground signs. Section 20-347 (a)(1) - Cross access is desirable bctween adjoining propertics with compatible land uses and good vehicular cOlU1ections should be required, but a "corridor extending the entire length of each block scrved" should not be required. It sounds like a parallel road system being built by private property 0\\'11ers for public benefit. Sen'ice and loading vehicles do need to be able to use the cross access cOlmections. Certain property o\\ners may need their 0\\11 attorney to review how item (c) affects their particular site. The meaning of itcm (f) is unclear to us and may need some work. Section 20-348 (1) - We agree that it is more appropriate for government to encourage rather than require certain building mnterials, with a few exccptions, because it's difficult to nnticipnte evcry possible application. (4) Screening of dWllpsters seems ncceptnble to us. (7) Outparcels should be able to conforn1 to and integratc with the overall project, within rcason. (11) We think that backf10w preventers and other valves could be screened by landscaping toward the back of the buffer area to avoid being placed in a parking space or driveway. A lot of time and energy has gone into developing these Design Standards and with a little more effort I think we can arrive at a plan that is acceptable to all concerned. Best regards, SCHRIMSHER PROPERTIES ~A~ Michael A. Schrimsher MAS/wlp cc: Charles Carrington Mayor Paul Partyka Commissioners: Michael Blake Larry Conniff Cindy Gennell John LangeIlotti David McLeod -, ~ . ~ \ . ~~I SCHRIMSHER PROPERTIES September 15, 1997 Mr. Ron McLemore, City Manager City of Winter Springs 1126 East S.R. 434 Winter Springs, FL 32708 RE: TO\m Center (TC) and Ncw Development Area (NDA) Design Standards Dear Ron: My previous letter dated September 5th, focused on the NDA Design Standards and Missy Casscells comments about them, but virtually all of my comments could also apply to the TC Design Standards. The new option of creating a six foot continuous landscaped island between rows of parking, which was substituted for dle option of2 foot wlpaved strips along parking spaces, is a good idea when it is combined with other adjustments. Increasing the maximum number of continuous spaces [rom 10 to 20 and shortening the minimum length of spaces from 20 feet to 18 feet is a good start. The minimwn width of spaces should also be reduced from 10 feet to 9 fect and the access drive minimum width should be reduced from 24 feet to 22 feet. The islands at each end of a row of parking spaces should be reduced from 9 or 10 feet to 6 feet with this option. This will still result in additional greenspace and creates thc only 40 car parking bay that would be acceptable to a developer. A developer who instead of the above option, chooses to use 9 foot wide islands for every tcn spaces should be allowcd 320 spaces per parking bay, but should use a 9 foot ,,~de continuous island around it to increase greenspace instead of the current 5 feet. Regardless of the choice, parking spaces should be a minimwn 9' x 18' and driveways should be a minimum 22 feet wide. Canopy trees should not be required at 30 foot intervals in the continuous 6 foot landscaped islands. The City's o\m arbor ordinance states that small trees must be thirty feet apart, mediwn trees forty feet apart, and large trees at least fifty feet apart. This is a good rule and agrees with tree spacing required along right-or-ways and gives the developer some choices in the design of landscaping. The isolated 9 foot islands could each have one large tree or two small trees planted in them. Irrigation with reclaimed water should only be required when available, and that's not specified on page 10 (NDA). Also, trees must be selected from the reconmlended tree palIet according to page 11, but my copies of both TC and NDA do not include any pallet. Both docwnents require walk:ways to "create visual interest", on page 12, and the NDA states that wall.ways must "meander" to do so. But, that must be reconciled with the straight sidewalks already built along S.R. 434 and Tuska\\illa Road. Also, these wall.ways are required to be "adjacent to the right-of-way", which is generally straight, and "adjacent" could mean on or off the right-of-way. Sidewalks along roads are usually in the right-of-way, however, and that should be stated here to avoid interfering with the planting of trees. On page 13 (TC), item (15) needs to allow for access to entrances through the landscaped area and signage visibility along tlle front facade of continuous store front buildings. Also, item (16) should not require a ten foot sidewalk within a plaza/hardscape that may be replacing a 10 or 13 foot wide landscaped area. There won't be any room for trees, furniture or lighting that are also required. On page 13 (NDA) and page 14 (Ie), damaged 600 =AST COLONIAL DRIVE : SUITE. 100 -:. ORLiC.f''':OO. FLOPIOA 32903 = Fl'..X I.cJ07! 6~E+9230 ~ OFFICE IL:D7j .0:23-7600 r" -.., 1 4 Mr. Ron McLemore September 12, 1997 Page 2 trees are required to be rcplaced with 4 inch caliper trees measured 3 feet above grade. To be consistent, these should be 3 inch caliper trees measured D.B.H. The oak trees to be planted in the landscape buffer should be a minimum of 3" caliper and 12 feet high. The holly trees planted at 35 foot intervals will not crcate a formal appearance because the 35 foot and 50 foot intervals ,...ill conflict with each other and trees planted at different times will vmy greatly in size. The city could undertake a tree-planting program in a limited area to achieve the desired result on a smaller scale. At the top of page 15 (TC), storm water retention areas should be allowed to be wet if designed as part of a water feature. References to pylon signs on page 16 and in the definition of Ground Sign on page 26 (NDA), should be eliminated but certain types of temporary signs will function as pole/pylon signs. For example, construction and marketing signs and some political signs will be made of 4" x 4" posts and 4' x 8' shects of plywood or similar materials. The prohibition against pole signs on page 21 should list those types of signs as exceptions. On page 16, item (8) and page 17, item (6), thc wording is awh."ward in the last line: "100' front foot" should be changed to "100 feet offrontagc". On page 18, item (d)(4), should omit the 14 foot height limit and instead merely prohibit the sign projecting abovc any roof or parapet elevation. Likewise, on page 17, item (c)(3). On pages 19-20, marketing signs should havc a minimum setback of 15 feet and a minimum height of 14 feet to make them consistent with all oUler signage. Also, on page 20, item (m)(1), should not completely prohibit neon although its use could be limited. On page 21, item (m)(1l)(c), could be abused if additional signage were attached to a trailer rather than merely identifying a compml)' name or its product. Some limits would be helpful. On page 25 (TC), itcm (10) nceds to be c1arificd. These overhangs could rcally clash with thc landscape/plazalhardscapc area rcquired to surround each building. 1l1crc are various typos, crrors and omissions in the S.R. 434 Corridor Vision Plan that should be corrected with a careful rcading onee all the changes have been agreed upon. Best regards, SCHRlMSHER PROPERTIES ~A~ Michael A. Schrimshcr MAS/wlp cc: Charles Carrington Mayor Paul Partyka Commissioncrs: Michael Blake Larry Conniff Cindy Gennell Jolm Langellotti David McLeod ( LARGE SHRUB \ COMlVlON NAIVIE Cherry Laurel Anise Sweet Viburnum Wax LeafLigustrum* Photinia * Wax Myrtle IVIEDIUNI SHRUB COlV[MON NAIVIE Pittosporum Variegated Pittosporum Sandankwa Viburnum Hetzii Juniper Pfitzer Juniper Shrub Holly Silverthorn Azalea Yew Podocarpus SlVIALL SHRUB COIVI1VION NATHE Dwarf Yaupon Holly Indian Hawthorn Dwarf Pittosporum Evergreen Giant Border Grass Azalea Thyrallis Yew Podocarpus GROUNDCOVER COIVIMON N AIVIE Liriope Border Grass Mondo Border Grass Dwarf Confed. Jasmine Parsonii Juniper Dwarf Shore Juniper African Lily DayLily TABLE I RECOMMENDED SHRUB PALLET BOTANICAL NAME MINThrm-1 HEIGHT REQUIRED Prunus caroliniana Illicium anisatum Viburnum odoratissimum Ligustrum japonicum Photinia spp. Myrica cerifera 30" 30" 30" 30" 30" 30" BOTANICAL NAME IvrINIMU~J HEIGHT REQUIRED Pittosporum tobira 24" Pittosporum tobira "Variegata" 24" Viburnum Suspensum 24" Juniperus crunensis var. crunensis "Hetzii" 24" Juniperus crunensis "Pfitzerana" 24" Ilex spp. 24" Elaeagmus pungens 24" Rhododendron indica 24" Podocarpus macrophyllus 24" BOTANICAL NAIVIE MINThl1.Ji\-l HEIGHT REQUIRED Ilex vomittoria "Nan a" Rapruolepis indica Pittosporum tobira "Wheeleri" Liriope muscari "Evergreen Giant" 18" 18" 18" 18" Rhododendron indica Thyrallis glauca Podocarpus macrophyllus 18" 18" 18" BOTANICAL NAIVfE MINThrm-I HEIGHT REQUIRED Liriope muscari 10 Pips/clump 9" O.c. Opruopogonjaponicus 10 Pips/clump 9" o.c. Trachelospemumjasminoides "Nana" 15" Spread 18" O.C. Juniperus chinensis 15" Spread 18" O.C. Juniperus conferta "Compacta" 12"-15" Spread 18" O.C. Agapanthus africanus 10 Pips/clump 18," O.C. Hemerocallis spp. 10 Pips/clump 18" O.C. Lantana African Iris Holly Fern Lantana montevidensis Dietes vegeta Cyrtomium falcatum 15 "spread 18" O.c. 10 Pips/clump 18" o.c. Gal. can 12"-15" spread 24" O.c. \ 4" pots - 2-3 plants/pot\.12" o.c. English Ivy Hedera helix *Must be used with a row of lower growing shrubs in front. Note: Plant list subject to administrative amendment from time to time. 2 TABLE 2 RECOMMENDED TREE PALLET \ \ CANOPY TREES \.. lVIINThIUM HEIG HT COlVThION NAl\tIE BOTANICAL NAlVIE REQUIRED Live Oak Quercus Virginiana 16' Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia 12' Sycamore Plantanus occidentalis 12' Red Maple Acer rubrum 12' Sweetgum Liquidambar styraciflua 12' OTHER LARGE TREES lV.o::NINfimtI HEIGHT COlVINION NAlVIE BOTANICAL NAlVIE REQUIRED Tulip Poplar Liriodendron tulipifera 12' Bald Cypress Taxodium distichum 12' Pines Pinus spp. 12' Southern Magnolia Magnolia grandiflora 12' River Birch Betula nigra 12' lVIEDIlJ1\'I TREES HEIGHT COMl\tION NAlVIE BOTANICAL NAlVIE REQUIRED American Holly Ilex opaca 10' Dahoon Holly Ilex cas sine 10' East Palatka Holly !lex opaca 'East Palatka' 10' Golden Rain Tree Koelreuteria formosana 10' Sweet Bay Magnolia virginiana 10' Loblolly Bay Gordonia lasianthus 10' Drake Elm Ulmus parvifolia sempervirons 'Drake' 10' Winged Elm Ulmus alata 10' Cherry Laurel Prunus caroliniana 10' Weeping Willow Salix babylonica 10' SlVIALL TREES HEIGHT COMlVION NAlVIE BOTANICAL NAME REQUIRED Wax Myrtle Myrica cerifera 8' Tree Ligustrum Ligustrum japonicum 8' ... J Crape Myrtle Yaupon Holly Chickasaw Plum Flowering Dogwood Redbud Tabebuia ACCENT PALlYIS CONIlYION NAlYIE Canary Island Date Palm Washington Palm Pindo Palm Cabbage Palm (Also L. lucidum) Lagerstoremia indica Ilex vomitoria Prunus anjusaolia Comus florida \ Cercis canadensis Tabebuia spp. 8' 8' 8' 8' 8' 8' BOTANICAL NAlYIE HEIGHT REQUIRED Phoenix canariensis Washingtonia robusta Butia capitata Sabal palm 5' 5' 5' 6' Pruning of trees shall be allowed to maintain appropriate clearance for access and minor pruning shall be allowed to promote healthy growth. The intent is to allow trees to achieve a natural tree canopy. Note: Plant list subject to administrative amendment from time to time. 4