The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1997 09 22 Regular Item H / ," . COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM H REGULAR X CONSENT INFORMATIONAL -.September 22, 1997 Meeting ~. ~ !DEET j4J--- honzatlOn REQUEST: Public Works Department Requesting Approval of the First Reading of Ordinance #684 Revising the Transportation Impact Fee. PURPOSE: The purpose of this Board item is to authorize the first reading of Ordinance #684 which replaces the Transportation Impact Fee Cost Table identified as Appendix "B" of Division 2, Article VII, Chapter 9 of the City Code of Ordinances. CONSIDERATIONS: The adoption of this ordinance is needed to revise the Transportation Impact Fee Cost Table (Appendix "B") to reflect the new lane mile cost of the Traffic Circulation Element Update Capital Improvements program. The new fee schedule represents an approximate reduction of 40% to the transportation impact fee. . The City Commission has retained the services of Conklin, Porter & Holmes Engineers, Inc. to update the Traffic Circulation Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Based on consultant recommendations, workshops and public input, a significant amount of the roadway projects initially included in the Comp Plan have been deleted particularly as it relates to new roa. This has lowered the estimated construction cost per lane mile from $936,827.00 to $561,879.00. As an example, the transportation impact fee for a single family home will be reduced from $1,478.27 to $890.96. The new impact fee is estimated to provide sufficient revenues to cover the needs of the capital improvements program. A Iransp-ortation Imp-act Fee Update is attached which includes the capital improvements projects list, growth projections, and revenue projections. The Traffic Circulation Update to the Comprehensive Plan will be presented September 22, 1997 Regular Agenda Item H Page 2_ to the City Commission for approval this fall after review by the Local Planning Agency. FUNDING: No funds are needed at this time. It is projected that the revised Transportation Impact Fee will provide sufficient revenues to fund the needs of the capital improvements program. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Commission approve the first reading of Ordinance #684 l~wering the lane mile costs as detailed in the revised Appendix "B" of Division 2, Article VII, Chapter of the City Code of Ordinances. IMPLElVIENTATION SCHEDULE: The new transportation impact fees will be effective upon second reading of the ordinance and execution by the Mayor. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance #684 2. Transportation Impact Fee Update COMMISSION ACTION: Attachment No. 1 ORDINANCE NO. ~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA, AMENDING APPENDIX "B" - TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE \VITH $561,879fLANE MILE, OF DIVISION 2 - TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES, ARTICLE VII -IMPACT FEES, CHAPTER 9 - LAND DEVELOPMENT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, CONFLICTS AND EFFECTIVE DATE. \VHEREAS, the City Commission ofthe City of Winter Springs, Florida, is desirous of amending its Transportation Impact Fee to assure it reflects the general conditions of its ordinances, resolutions, policies and procedures; WHEREAS, it is necessary to update these Codes from time to time. NO\V THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA: SECTION I - That Appendix "B" Winter Springs City Transportation Impact Fee with $936,827/1ane mile is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced the attached Appendix "B" Transportation Impact Fee with $561,879/lane mile. SECTION n - CONFLICTS. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith being the same are hereby repealed. SRC:TTON TIT - SEVERABILITY. If any section or portion of a section or subsection of this ordinance proves to be invalid, unlawful or unconstitutional it shall not be held to invalidate or impair the validity, force or effect of any other section or portion of section or subsection or part of this Ordinance. SECTION IV - EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and adoption. CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA PAUL P. PARTYKA, MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK First Reading Posted Second Reading and Public Hearing APPENDIX B ITEM lAND USE TYPE CODE 110 130 150 'SI INDUSTlUAL Gcncr~ Li&Jl1 Industr131 Industrial P.ut Wuc:housing ~fini*w,uehousc: 210 220 2JO NO 2S:! RLSlnENTIAL Single F:lImly I)clxhcd l...ow-risc ApartfT\Cflts low-ri.sc Residtnli:al Condo Mobile: f-Jomc: P:lIrk Congrq;:lilc Cafe LODCING MOld R.ECRLA TIONAL GolfCou.r~ . Movie Thc3tH R.Kquc1 Club Uowling Alley IN~IITlrnON.\L Chuu::h O:.y Cue: Calfef LodSdFr.u~ Orgwution MEDICAL IlospiuJ Nursing Horne Oinic no 4JO 444 4'>2 494 S<.O 566 591 6'0 620 6JO 710 1:!O 750 770 OFFICE Ccn<nI Ollie< D1Jg. MaIiauocnul Ollie< BWS. OffICe' Puk. . Business P:u1.: COMMERCIAL Bldg. M,lIeri~s/ Lumba $(OI"C Sp<ci.Jcy RcUa Ccnl... Discoont Store IbrdwucIP.linl StOfc NuntrylGudrn SIOlc Reuil Q...2S.000 sf 25.000.S0.000 sf SO,OOO.?'J.!J?'J sf '00.000-'99.999 sf 200.000-299.999 ,r Qu:altl)' Rc-suuu.nl High Turnover Sit-down Rest. FUI FooJ 'Wlo Drive chru F.l~ Food _I Orive Ihru AuIO Cue CentCf Savicc StOll. w/Col1vcnicncc Sc!f$CrvlCC Cu W:ash . TucSlorc' Convc:nicnce Score (24 hr) (w/o !;i.solinc pumps) Convenience wI &.;J.s pumps FurNture SlOfC: 812 &14 &1) &16 &17 I~O &J' ;'32 SJJ BJ4 &40 845/&46 &47 &4& &)1 &53 &90 SERVICES 911 W;dl.:-in Bank 912 Drive-in Banl GRUllP MID RANGE ._lIN1TS 50.000 40. COO ;75.000 325.000 12.500 .i7,SOO 7).000 ISO.OOO 250.000 9.000 5.000 2.&00 J.OOO 6.000 1.000 5 5.000 ~.OOO 2.500 &0.000 100.000 300.000 100.000 500 1.000 SF 1.000 . SF 1.000 SF I SI} Joo JOO 200 200 200 12S 145 6 n.ooo N.ooo I AC I SCR 1.000 SF 1.000 SF 10.000 5.000 500 1.000 SF 1.000 SF 1 MEM 300 100 S.OOO 1 BED I' BED 1.000 SF 1.000 SF 1.000 SF 1.000 SF 1.000. SF 20.000 30.000 90.000 27.000 9.000 1.000 Sf 1.000 SF 1.000 Sf 1.000 SF '.000 SF 1.000 SF 1.000 SF 1.000 SF '.000 SF 1.000 Sf '.000 SF 1.000 SF '.000 SF 1.000 SF 1.000 SF 1.000 SF , STL 1.000 SF 1.000 SF . 1.000 SF '.000 SF &.000 1.500 1.000 SF GllA 1.000 SF GllA HJT ,\1. GIIM OAII.Y IJAlI.Y glA TRIP RATL-TRIPS ClI CU ClI ClI ClI N/A N1A N1A . N1A N1A RAt GBA GBA GBA GBA GllA GLA GBA CllA GilA GLJ. GLJ. GLA GlA GlA GllA GBA GilA GilA GlA GLA GLJ. GllA GllA GOA GUA GilA GilA GUA GilA N1A N1A N1A GllA GllA GB^ GilA NtA N/A N1A GBA 6.45 7.50 7.1' 026 645.0 2250,0 711 0 1300 9.46 6;.1 5.87 4,S5 2.15 28:;X.O 19020 1174.0 970.0 HO.O 9.94 124:! 5 5.06 I SJ.lJ 17.14 n.;J 73).7 9200 5656 79<) 9 IU2 7l):!6 0.29 9.1l 3~J(;,J 1~5 0 12,63 261 23.79 3S(l4 0 261.0 119.0 Ib6:! J099 1'.67 1;.8S S31.0 12~9.6 4376.; 45'1.0 JO,55 4067 S9W ~I 19 ;6,01 61'.0 I!~O.I 5oJ91.0 1J84 & ::;1..t,7 154 08 102,OS 7.72 00.70 50.12 92,67 206,;6 7'>0.00 6.l2.1:! 15.86 846.06 108.00 23.94 7n.?'J 1926.0 382S.0 S'X'" 0 9'050 12530,0 8H.0 10J! 8 2212.0 1$01)64 95,2 S.'6.1 540.0 1197 '4760 f)55"~0 . :;~-I :nS8 0 >07.! '40.61 :79.,1} 11:!4.9 9780 ONE Of TWO TRIP ENDS 0.5 0.5 PER CcNr DAILY OF lllSCRlII NgW TRH'S FACroR O.S O.S O.S O.S O.S 0.5 O.S 0.5 0.5 O.S .O.S OS O.S O.S o.~ O.S 0.5 0.5 OS 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 05 O.S 0.5 O.S 0.5 O.S 0..5 0.5 05 0.5 0.5 05 0.5 0.5 O.S O.S 0.5 50~~ .61-/. 0,5 O.S 100-/. 1 00': ~ 100-/. I~~ I.S2 1.09 1.74 1.09 I~~ I(){.r.~ , 00': ~ 100"/. I~~ I.OJ 0.93 0.94 1.1. 0.79 I~~ 0.51 I~~ I~~ 100':/'. 100"/. 0.78 1.24 1.07 1.06 100'!". 25./. I~~ on 1.7"1 1.0J 100~~ I=~ I~~ 0.5 0.5 I 100'~ 100'~. IOO~... I~~ US 1.25 1.25 1.04 SS~~ 5S~~ 5S'~ ss~~ 55'!". I.OS 0.92 0.57 0.95 10J 3~,~ ;~~ 0.9 0.92 0.9J 0.93 0.9-1 O,&J 0.79 0.54 0.58 I 0.67 0.74 I 0.67 50~~ 61~~ G~". !2~. 52"/. 52~"_ ,...., 7-t-/o. :2'1./. !:~~ :?:::~.. 5j-,. 0.67 084 3~~ ;~~ 1.23 1.56 NEW DAIl Y TRIPS ATI'RflIIJI'AJlI.E TO SITE 560.93 774.7S 27>S.16 2)45.72 176.43 j0869 84S.0.1 361.79 QL9& 260.01 6SI.5. I l7:! 6K 2582.63 J9'U.70 2SJ.!2 :::11.9::; .11056 2&5.97 )S.21 62,J 5 9"J.9O 36.5' 108.78 17600 6S.38 207.S4 :!28.8S AVE rRIf' lENGTH (MILES) 490,20 In6.2S 618.51 70.&5 1461.57 &M.43 5SI.78 5S2.90 169.&S :;5....11 2!6;'4 570.J9 J02.61 413,96 J41)5 a'/6K 74.6& 9S 1.00 65,25 S9.48 4.40 4,40 2.75 Z.:!5 1,75 2.00 2.25 1 SO 2.75 J.OO -I.,W 2.S0 2.50 2.~O 4.40 0.7S 2.25 ).26 0.7S 0.75 4.40 .1.50 1.50 ~~ OF VEIIICLE MILES ON TilE CITY STREET SYSTEM 5.00 5.00 S.OO S.OO S3.47".1. 53.4~~ S3.47". 5).47~.. 4.90 4.90 490 4.90 4.90 5J.';7"/. 5).-47~~ S3.47'1. S3.47~~ 53.47"/. 5.00 5J.4~~ 4;40 4,'0 4.40 ....40 S3.4~~ 53,47""'. 5j.47~~ 5J,47~.. 4,40 1.50 4.40 514~". 5:;.47-/. . 5J.4~~ 5.00 5.00 5.00 53.4~~ S3.47". S3.47'/. 500 5.00 5.00 5.00 5~.41':'. 53.4~~ SJ.4~~ 5J.4~~ 53.47'/. S).4~.. 5".4~;' 53.4~~ 5).47~~ 5.1.4~~ 53.47~~ SJ.4~.. 53."~. 5J.-47~. S3"r']-/_ 53.47". 5J,47~~ 5.l.47~.~ n.47~. 5:;..a7~.. 53.47~~ . SJ.4"r.-.. SJ"'7~4 5:;.47~. S3.47~. S].47~.. 5:i.4~.. NEW I>AII. ,. VEIL MILES ON TilE CHI' S\'STF.M 1310.SS 327&,JK. 1653.75 189.42 3&29.]6 2317,23 1445.68 1448.6' 445.01 1060.33 613.20 1)41.9-. 71'.94 997.44 51 :::J 70.J2 I7S 69 2~4:!',50 174,45 15901 14996J 207'.29 DI244 6271.2& 41S.07 726.24 1:!,n.57 435.26 JJS 2S 278.05 7&3.&:; 1814 93 J797,5'/ 6JZ9.29 667.14 28:;.)0 415..15 362.27 82,S4 25.0' 120.19 6J.64 43.62 70.58 1608S '66.46 18;.55 LOS 0 PER LANE C~ACII.Y. &050 &050 8050 80S0 S050 80S0 SOSO 80S0 &050 S050 8050 80~0 . 8050 8050 8050 S050 &0:\0 tO$O. W50 S050 S050 8050 S050 S050 S050 &050 8050 NEW CITY STREET S\'STE~t JANE MILES CURRENT COST PER TOTAL . LANE ~IILF. !,:OST(SI IF. 8050 80S0 80S0 8050 8050 &OSO SOSO 80S0 8050 &050 8050 80S0 &050 S050 80S0 XOSO S050 8050 SOSO &OSO o.o:.;~s 0.0'174 0.2279 0..171"1 0.7562 0.OS::!9 00:;52 00:\16 o 0-l75 0.0103 0.0031 0.0'49 0..0079 o 0054 0008& O.O~OO 0.0207 0,022& 0162& 0.4073 0.2054 0.02JS 1561.S79 56'.&79 561.&79 56'.&79 0.4757 O,:!X79 0.1796 0.1800 0.05SJ 561.&79 S61.&79 56'.&79 561.879 561.&79 0.1317 561.879 0.OlD6 0.1667 0.OS8.' 0.1!39 561,.879 561 &"19 561.879 561.879 o 010~ 0.000:7 0.0215 561.871) S6I,87tt 56'.879 0.J158 O.O~ 17 0.019S S61.&79 56'.879 561.879 0,1863 0.2573 0.9084 0.7790 561 &79 561.&79 561.879 561.&79 0.0516 0.0902 0.'544 0.OS41 00'6& S61.&79 561.879 561,S7') SO uny 5(.1.879 561.879 561.879 St.I)!"/'} S61.8"]Q 561,879 561,879 561.871.J ~61.87C) :'$.I,87<J 561.8"/,} 561.879 561.879 561.S79 561.879 Sl..I,S79 561.!79 561 S7Q 561.879 191.475 22S.126 IIS.419 13.121 267.2&4 161.740 '00.906 101.11'. 31.061 46,989 9J.666 49.692 69,620 5,7J'J .1.<)()o) 12.263 In..16J 17,176 11.09S 1O.f.6n 14~.57J SIO.3?! 437.717 ~8,972 50.690 &6..n9 .10,.iSO 9,.1.10 1'),~08 54.711 12&.076 :!l,5,(){,5 4.U,n6 4b,W7 IQ,T/4 28.lJ77 :!6,h!:! .s.7S~ 1.74S &),Xl) 4.-1,12 :;.0-15 4.926 11,:!2Q 11.619 12.812 III' 1M rEr> TOrA!. COST "E~.IJ:-;rr_... 191.t.75 162~ 7~ I.I:\~ 29 ~6 4.1 S".IO,95 5;91J 5$....5) ~OS.S6 15:5.3 I 74.00'1 59107 J~-l.06 15.610 1)2 1,505.82 2:,')()l) S2 )7; 93 98' T!. ~-1 53 591 5-1 1~1.76 2:,219.69 !.()I)) 45 J.614H 1.:;61.()() 1).'6 85 1.4-15.5S 1.68968 963 t)6 1.I::!S.2'O I.O..U~.SS 1.,552.6) 1.-158,95 1,70707 1,7(./.10 1,767..10 5.178.58 3.954.79 IO,J.1883 . 1.894 O~ %3.6.' 1.7-1$.17 1.677.78 SS8.JH 1,522.4J l.'nO,5::? 1..10,';7 '..52.3! I 3,660...n Attachment No. 2 TRANSPORTATION IlVIPACT FEE UPDATE September 1997 Conklin, Porter and Holmes - Engineers, Inc. 1104 East Robinson Street Orlando, Florida 32801 (407) 425-0452 CPH Project No. W0459.00 .' EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The existing Transportation Impact Fee method, established in 1990, will remain unchanged. Appendix B of this fee method will be revised based on the information contained in the "City of Winter Springs Transportation Study" dated August 1997. Revisions were made to the roadway capital improvements program which resulted in a reduced construction cost per lane mile. Based on the required capital improvements outlined and described in the City of Winter Springs Transportation Study, August 1977, the Transportation Impact Fee can be adjusted (decreased). The reduction is based on an approximately 40 percent reduction in the cost per lane mile of roadway construction, which directly results in a 40 percent reduction in the single family, multi- family and commercial/industrial impact fees. As part of our project task, we were asked to evaluate whether the projected revenues would be sufficient to construct the capital improvements projects. Based on our analysis contained herein, the program will be adequately funded. The identified transportation expenditures for 1996 thru 2010 (the plaJIDing period) total approximately $5,678,463. The projected revenues during the planning period plus the impact fee fund balance as of October 1, 1996, total approximately $5,823J70.We believe that the future revenues combined with existing funds will be adequate to fund the required transportation capital improvements. We recommend that the new lane mile cost of $561.879 and the associated revisions to Appendix B of the Transportation Impact Fee of the Code of Ordinances be adopted. W045900.FEE/tmz ,~ CAPIT AL IMPROVEMENTS The proposed capital improvements program is shown in Tables 1 and 2. The program is divided into four phases through the planning period (1996 - 2010) and represents the roadway projects necessary to maintain traffic flow throughout the City of Winter Springs. The proposed capital improvements program is based on the results of the City of Winter Springs Transportation Study. Table 3 illustrates the calculation of the lane miles of proposed construction which was used to re-calculate the cost per lane mile for the City of Winter Springs transportation capital improvements program. The total cost of the program, $5.678.463, was divided by 10.1062 lane miles which resulted in a cost per lane mile of $561.879. The fee table of the existing ordinance, Appendix B, was revised by inputting the new lane mile cost. The existing Appendix B contained in the City Code of Ordinances was based on $936,827 per lane mile. This represents a decrease in the transportation impact fee of approximately 40 percent. The new Appendix B is attached. W045900.FEE/lmz :..~ TABLE 1 NEEDED CITY TRANSPORT A TION IlVIPROVEiVIENTS \VINTER SPRlNGS TRANSPORTATION STUDY Facilitv From To Improvement Phase Cost Panama Road Moss Road Edgemon Ave. Pave & Drainage S114,827 Hayes Road North of Pavement on Bahama Road Hayes Road Pave & Drainage $214,678 Moss Road Panama Road Pavement on Moss Road Pave & Drainage $169,250 Hayes Road Replace Bridge/ 5408,158 Raise Road Moss Road Replace Bridge/ 5411,550 Raise Road SUBTOTAL PHASE I $1,318,463 Bahama Road Shore Road Hayes Road Paving & Drainage II $350,000 Panama Road Shore Road Moss Road Paving & Drainage Il $840,000 Fisher Road Panama Road City Limits Paving &: Drainage J[ $750,000 Haves Road Intersection w/S.R. 434 Add Turn Lanes J[ S 150,000 SUBTOT AL PHASE II $2,090,000 Moss Road S.R.419 S.R.434 4 Lanes III S 1 ,000,000 SUBTOTAL PHASE III S 1,000,000 Winter Spgs. Blvd. NOl1hem Way Northern Way Add Turn lanes IV S250,000 (east section) SUBTOTAL PHASE IV $250,000 TOTAL (1996-2010) ROADS $4,658,463 W045900.FEE/lmz TABLE 2 NEEDED CITY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS Traffic Signals S.R. 434 & Tuscora Drive S.R. 434 & Vista Willa Drive S.R. 419 & Edgemon Avenue S.R. 419 & Moss Road Moss Road & Dolphin Winter Springs Boulevard &; Northern Way Northern Way & Shetland Avenue Northern Way & Tuscora Drive Northern Way & Vista Willa Drive Trotwood Boulevard & Northern Way Edgemon A venue &; Shepard Road Winter Springs Bou levard & Northern Way (easternmost) SUBTOTAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS Cost S 85,000 $ 85,000 S 85,000 $ 85,000 S 75,000 S 80,000 S 75,000 S 75,000 $ 75,000 S 75,000 S 75,000 S 75,000 S I ,O:W,OOO \\'045900.FEE/tl11Z TABLE 3 LANE MILE CALCULATIONS Phase I Facilitv From J.Q Lane !\'liles Panama Road Moss Road Edgemon Ave. .3277 Hayes Road North of Pavement on Bahama Road Hayes Road .6193 Moss Road Panama Road Pavement on Moss Road .5038 Hayes Road Bridge .3788 Moss Road Bridge .3788 Phase II Bahnma Road Shore Road Hayes Road 0.7576 Panama Road Shore Road 1\'loss Road 1.7803 Fisher Road Panama Road City Limits 1.6288 Haves Road Intersection w/S.R. 434 0.189-1 Phase III r,'!05S Road S.R.419 S.R. 434 2.1212 Phase IV Winter Spgs. Blvd. Northern Way Northern Way 1.4205 (east section) TOT AL LANE MILES 10.1062 .(1996-2010) W045900.FEE/tl11z W045900.FEEltl11z . . PROJECTED REVENUES We prepared, as Table 4, a commercial/industrial development mix over the proposed planning period to approximate the amount of revenue which would be provided by the projected commercial/industrial development. The development mix was used to illustrate how various development types on the vacant land would provide the anticipated grov,rth. The resulting revenue was calculated from the proposed Appendix B. Within the planning period (1996-2010), it was projected that 4,028 employees would be added within the commercial/industrial tracts of the City of Winter Springs. This was based on 16 employees per build~ble acre. The planning data received indicated that approximately 252 buildable acres would be developed for commercial/industrial use over the planning period. This is total gross acreage and actual net building square footage for estimating impact fees was obtained by using 20% of this figure as the actual building size available. This figure is based on using 20% of the site for public rights- of-way/easements, 20% for retention requirement, 20% for parking, 20% for open space and 20% for building. This resulted in building square footage of 2,195,000 square feet during the planning period. We used this number as our target value in Table 4 to estimate the approximate value of revenues from the transportation impact fee. Please note that the square footage in Table 4 is slightly higher than the target value. We estimate the revenue to be approximately $2.141,989 over the planning period. The estimated impact fee revenues for single family construction are $1,150,216, based on the construction of 1,291 single family units. During the planing period, 1,667 single family units were projected. Of these, 376 units are covered by existing developer agreements and were paid for by impact fee credits. The estimated impact fee revenues for multi-family construction are $374,976, based on the construction of 744 multi-family units. The estimated balance in the impact fee fund at the beginning of the planning period (October 1, 1996) was $2,156.189. The addition of these figures produces a grand total of $5.823.370 which is roughly equivalent to the capital improvements program:for the planning period. \V045900.FEE/lmz ~ TABLE 4 PROJECTED IMPACT FEE / DEVELOPlYIENT lYIIX (1996 - 2010) : Proj, Average Total Square Fee Total Category Units Qty. Size Units Footage Per Unit Proj. Fee ( I 000) INDUSTRIAL General Light Industrial 1000 SF 4 100000 400 400 914.75 $365,900 Warehousing 1000 SF 2 100000 200 200 ] 154.29 5230,858 Mini-Warehouse SU 3 500 1500 375 26.44 539,660 LODGING Motel R!vl 125 125 37.5 592.07 $74.009 RECREA TIONAL Movie Theater SCR 6 6 120 15610.92 S93,666 INSTITUTIONAL Church 1000 SF 3 10000 30 30 573.93 S17,218 Day Care 1000 SF 4 5000 20 20 981.72 519,634 Lodge/fraternal MEM 2 500 1000 100 24.53 524,530 OFFICE General Office Bldg. 1000 SF 50000 50 50 2093.45 $104.672 COlvli\'lERCIAL Bldg. Mtls.lLumber 1000 SF 80000 80 80 1448.58 S115,886 Specially Retail 1000 SF 30000 30 30 1689.68 $50,690 Discount Store 1000 SF 2 100000 200 200 963.66 S192.732 Nursery/Garden Store 1000 SF I 10000 10 10 1048.88 $ 1 0,489 Retail (25,000 to 50,000 SF) J.OOO SF 4 37500 150 150 1458.95 $218,843 Retail (50,000 to 99,999 SF) 1000 SF 2 75000 150 150 1707.67 $256,151 Quality Restaurant 1000 SF 2 9000 18 18 5178.58 $93,214 High Turnover Sit-down Rest ]000 SF 2 5000 10 10 3954.79 $39,548 Fast w/o Drive thIu 1000 SF ") 2800 5.6 5.6 1 0348.83 557,953 "- Fast w/ Drive thru 1000 SF 2 3000 6 6 8894.02. 553,364 Auto Cnre Center 1000 SF 3 ' 6000 18 18 963.64 S17,346 Tire Store 1000 SF 2 5000 10 10 888.38 S8,884' Convenience Store w/pumps 1000 SF 2 2500 5 5 1970.52 59,853 Furniture Store 1000 SF 2 80000 160 160 140.37 S22,459 Walk-in Bank 1000 SF 8000 8 8 1452.32 $11,619 Drive Thru Bank 1000 SF 3500 3.5 3.5 3660.4 7 512,812 TOTALS 2196.6 $2,141,989 " APPENDIX B NEW AVE ~~ OF VEltlCl.E NEW DAILY NEW CITY TOTAL ONE OF !'ER cen DAIl.Y VAIL Y TIIII'S TRIP MILES ON TilE VEil MIl.ES LOS D STItfET CURRENT lI!'l>.-lTED ITEM l.ANV USE TYPE GROUP GU,V DAILY DAILY TWO TRIP OF D1SCRIU ATIRlUUTAIlLE LENGTlI CITY STREET ON TilE CITY !'EII LANE 5 YSTEM COST PER TOTAL TOT.\1. COS r COOE MID RAl'!f;~ UN.!"!.~ . GI.A TRIP R-"J:L1.'ill:L ENI)~ NE~I~II'S ~OR TO SITE (~.~II.ES)_ SYSTEM SYSTEM CA!'ACITY I~NE MILES .!.A~E MILE != 0 S T IS ITI;_ J:!i~U:'JIT ... INlllJSTRIAI. 110 Gcn~raJ Light Industrial 100.000 1.000 SF GilA 0<5 645.0 05 100':'. I.S2 490:W 500 H4-r/. IJ 10 55 K050 0.162X S%l)rl9 1,1)).475 \'lJ., 7~ 110 Industri;aJ Park lOO.OOO 1.000 SF GIlA 1.50 22500 0.5 I~~ IO'J 1226.25 5.00 53.<~~ 3278 38 8050 0.0107) 561.879 218,826 7r;! 75 ISO Wa.-chousing , 00.000 1.000 SF GIlA 111 711 0 0.5 IO~/. 1.74 618.57 5.00 53,47% 1653.75 8050 o 2051 561.879 115.429 1,151:!") 151 ~fini.w,Jfchous.e 500 I ~U GIlA 026 1100 0.5 IOO~~ 1.09 7085 500 5J.470;'., 189.42 8050 0.0235 561.879 1.1.121 26.1.1 RESIDENTIAL 210 Single F~mily Dcuchcd 300 I CU WA 9.46 1838.0 0.\ I~~ 1.03 1461.57 490 53A7~~ 3829.30 80\0 047;7 561.879 267.2g~ Si)lj.'}5 2:20 l.ow-n.'iC Apaf1mcnlS 300 I CU N/A 634 1902.0 05 I=~ o 9l 884.4l 4.90 S).4-r.~ 2317.23 8050 0.2879 561.879 161.740 =-j'J IJ 2iO Low-.isc RcsiJcnlial (undo 200 I CU N/A 587 111-10 0.5 IO~~ 094 55'.78 490 53 47~~ J.1.15.l;S 8050 o 1796 )61.879 100.906 5u~ 5J 240 MobiJe flome PuL: 200 1 Cll N/A .185 9700 0.5 I~~ L1~ 552.90 < 90 5H7~'. J.l'1861 8050 01800 561.871) 10'.111 "1)550 252 Congregate Care 200 I CU N/A 2,IS 4)0.0 0.5 IOO~~ 0.79 169.85 4.90 53.47~~ 44501 8050 0.0553 561.879 31.00' l:\j J I LODGING )20 Mllld 125 I RM WA I) 1)4 IN::! 5 0.5 'OO~'. 0.57 }54 II \.00 ~.l47':'. 1060:l.1 8050 O.IJ 17 561.87? 7,1.009 Sl1:! 0"1 RECRI:.\ TIONA I. <30 Golf Cours< 1<5 , AC NIA 506 73).7 0.\ I~~ 0.18 :!Kb 14 4.-10 5)..a~~ 613.20 8050 008)6 561.H79 "b.t)S~) ;~~ Ot. "44-.1 Movie Thener 6 I SCR N/A 15) )) 920.0 05 100-/. 1,2-1 510.39 4..10 53.47~. 1J41.9.' K050 0.166~ 561.F? 93.666 15,{.1O'>::!: 4'12 R.lC(IUCI Club 1l.OOO 1.000 SF (iliA 11'.1 56\ 6 0.5 IM~ 1.07 l026' ",.W 5 ..47~~ 711.9.1 8050 0.0884 561.879 49.61)'2 1.5058::! '-94 Huwling Alley !.t,ooo 1.000 SF (;nA J.l..l 7()<),9 05 10<.1':'. 1.06 42396 440 53A7~~ 9974.1 &050 0.1239 561.879 61).620 2,fl{)03? INSTl1'UTIONA L )bO Church 10.000 1.000 SF GilA 9.31 93.2 0.5 IOtr:~ 075 )495 4AO SJ.47'Y. 821J 8050 0.0102 561.879 5,7]9 573'U 566 O..y Care Center 5.000 1.000 SF GilA 7926 3963 05 25':~ 1.77 87.68 1.50 5J.4~~ 7032 8050 0.0087 561.879 4.909 981 72 591 lod~elfr~lt'm31 Org:t.niLuion 500 I MEM N/A 0]9 145.0 05 IOO:~ 103 7468 -.1.40 53.47~~ 17569 8050 00213 561.879 1:!.2bJ 1~ S, MEDICAL 610 Hospit3.1 300 , IlED WA 1268 3804.0 0.\ I~~ 0.5 951.00 5.00 S).47':~ 2542.50 8050 O.J 158 561.879 177.46) 51)1 ~-I 620 Nursing (iorne: 100 I IlED NlA 261 261.0 0\ IU~~ 0.5 65.25 500 5J.47~. 17< 45 8050 0.0~11 561.879 1~.176 121.76 630 Clinic 5.000 1.000 SF GIlA 1379 '19.0 0.5 IOO~/. I 59.48 5.00 53 47~~ 1590' 8050 0.0198 56'.879 1I.O'J8 2,1190<) o Fl'ICE 110 Genenl Offict' Bldg. 50.000 1.000 SF GIlA 16 6~ 8ll.0 0.5 100"/. 1.35 560,93 5.00 S3A~~ 149963 8050 O.186J 561.879 IO-l,672 2.cYJJ 4~ no MedicaVOcnl.J1 Office BIdS. 40.000 1.000 SF GIlA 309') 1139 b 05 I~~ 1.25 714.75 5.00 5H7~'. 2011.29 8050 0.2573 561.879 IH.573 3.614 H 750 Offict' P:uk 375,000 1.000 SF GilA 1167 4376 :; 0.5 ,~~ 1.25 2735.16 500 5H~~ 7J 1244 8050 0.9084 561.879 510)98 1.3(11.06 770 Business Pm 325.000 1.000 SF GRA 13.88 45'1.0 0.5 I~'~ 1.04 23-15.72 5.00 SJ.4~~ 6271.28 8050 0.7790 561.879 ~37,T!7 ')4685 COMMERCL\L 812 Bldg. f<.blrn:;alsl lumber Slofe 20.000 1.000 SF GOA 30.55 011.0 0.5 55~~ 1.05 176 43 4AO SJ.47~'. 415.07 &050 0.0516 561.879 18.972 1.4.18.5S 814 SpeciJ..!ry Ret3il CC'nlc:1 JO.OOO 1.000 SF GLA 4067 1220.1 0.5 55~~ 0.92 308.69 4.40 5) 47~'. 726 24 8050 O.O90:! 561.879 50.690 1.689 6S 815 Discount 5lOrc 90.000 1.000 SF GIlA \990 j3~)1.0 0.5 55~~ 0.57 8.'5.0.' ~.75 53.47~~ 1242.57 8050 O.IHI 5l~I.S7i) 8h.71t) ru,} 61> 816 Ilardw3relr.1inl Slorc 21.000 1.000 SF GIlA ~J,29 13848 0.5 5W. 0.95 361.79 2.25 S).47~~ 435.26 8050 O.O~.II 561.87" 30)80 1.125.20 817 Nur\Cry/G31 den Store 9.000 1.000 SF GIlA 36,08 324.7 0.5 55':.. 1.03 91.98 2.75 SJ.47~~ 13525 8050 0.016S 561.S7{i 9..1.10 I.D-IS 8K 820 MC1:lil 0.25.1lOO 11" 11.500 1.000 SF GLA 15-1 OK IQ:!{.O 05 3<Y.'. 0.9 :!hO,Or 2.00 5H7~~ 278.05 &050 0.03.IS 561 Jl71) I'J.,Jln~ 1.~S2,6) 25,000.50,000 sf .n.500 1.000 SF GLA 102,011 )82S.0 0,5 J7~~ 0.92 6515; :!.:!5 53 47% 78).83 &050 0.0')]4 Sbl.S71) 5-1.711 1,-158.(j) 50,000--9<),9')<) sf 75.000 '.000 SF GLA 7:s7:!. 5')(~1 0 0.\ 5~~ O.~)J unt,S 2. 50 5H7~~ 18]:'19J 80~O 0.2279 561.879 12li,076 1.707.&7 IOO.OOO-I99.?9? ,r 150.000 '.000 SF GLA bO.7ll 9105.0 0.5 bl~/. 0.9) 2582.bl 2.75 53.47~~ J797.57 8050 O..Hn 56I,S71) 2(,5.065 1.767,10 200.000-299.999 ,r 250.000 1.000 SF GtA ~O 12 125300 0.5 67~~ 09,1 19<~. 70 JOO 53.47~~ 6):?9.2() 8050 O.7St.! 561.871} 4..11.776 1.7(.7.10 811 (lll~liIY Rc~lauunr 9.000 '.00" SF (iH:\ en 1t7 Kl-IO O,~ S1~~ 08] 2&1.82 4 ,10 5 1..17~~ /.6774 li05l) o aS2? 5()I.S'J'} .1t,.{'O"l 5.178 5~ SJ2 JliSh TUnlovc:r Sir.Jown Rnl. 5.000 1.000 SF GilA 206.36 10) I 8 05 5:r/. 0.79 2.11.1).. :!50 SJ,47~'. 283 .10 KO~O () 0;.5:2 ~(.I,K71) If).T1~ '.'15.~ 7') 8)] h..t Food w/o Orive thm 2.500 '.000 SF GBA 7')0 00 2:!llO 0.5 ~2':'. 054 .1l(l.~6 250 5.1.-17~~ .115.15 S050 0051(, ~bl,S7" '!K.IJ'17 10).U1U 8)< f .ls1 1:000 wi Orive Ilu\J J.OOO '.000 SF (jIJA <..J:!I:! IX')(, ,I 05 'Ii...., o ~8 28:5.1)7 2.50 5JA )~~ 382.27 SIl~O 00-175 5(.I.H7t) 16J)&! IUN4 02 8<0 Aulo C:lIC Cc:nlC'f 6.000 1.000 SF GtA 15.86 95.2 O.S 1.1':'. I 35,21 4.40 \3"'~~ 82Ji-I 8050 OOIOJ 561.87'} ~,7S~ %J(..\ &<51ll46 $ef"f1CC 5131. w/Convcnience 1.000 '.000 SF Gl.A 8.16.06 846.1 0.5 22"'. 0.67 62.35 0.75 53.47% 25.0' 8050 0.0031 561.879 1.7.15 1.145 :;7 841 Self SCf\-~ce Car Wa!lh 5 I STL GI..A 10S 00 5400 0.5 50~~ 0.74 99.90 2.25 53..7~~ 12019 8050 0.0149 561.879 S.:iSlJ '.677.78 848 Tire Slore 5.000 1.000 SF GIlA 2J,94 119.1 0.5 61% 1 36.51 3.26 53.47~~ 6J {..l K050 0.0079 561.579 4.4.1! 8S8 Jg &51 Convenience Slore (24 hr) ~.ooo 1.000 SF GilA 7)).99 1476,0 0.5 '1-:0., 0.67 108.78 0.75 5J.47~'. 43.62- S050 00054 561.879 :;.l).lS 1.)~~.4) (wlo gasoline pump~) 853 Con'Vcnit'nce wI Gas pumps ::t~OO 1.000 SF GO,\ lJ5~.:!O 2JSS 0 0.5- 11~~ O.tJ7 176.00 07\ 5JA7~. 70.SIi 805ll o 008S ~(.r .879 '1.9'26 1.1J7t) )~ 890 furniture Slore 80.000 1.000 SF GilA ~ S-1 ;O7.~ 0.5 53':.'. o S4 68.38 4.40 5J.47~~ 1608S &050 00:200 561,87<) II,:!:!') 1-1037 SERVIO:S 911 W",I1::.in lJ",nk 3,000 '.000 SF GilA '.1061 111.1.9 0.5 3()% 1.23 207.54 1.50 S:i.47~~ 166.46 SOSO 0.0207 56 I J'7'} 11.619 1.452,J2- 912 Drive-in B<l.M 3.500 1.000 SF GUA ~79..Lj 97S 0 0.5 J~~ 1.56 2"8.85 1.50 53,4~~ 18).55 8050 0.0"28 561 879 12.811 ..fJol.O..n