HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996 02 12 Consent Item D
1
COMMISSION AGENDA
~~~
.
ITEM
D
REGULAR
CONSENT X
INFORMATIONAL
February 12, 1996
Meeting
MGR /~ IDEPT j)-r-
Authorization
REQUEST: Public Works Department Requesting Supplement to Traffic Engineering Study
PURPOSE: The purpose of this Board item is to request authorization to execute Supplement
#1 to Amendment 45 - Consulting Engineering Services for Traffic
EngineeringIPlanning Services with Conklin, Porter & Holmes Engineers, Inc. to
Complete the Traffic Circulation Element of the Comprehensive Plan.
CONSIDERATIONS:
This supplement is needed to assist City staff in compiling traffic zone data that is
required to update the traffic circulation element of the Comprehensive Plan. Amendment
45 - Consulting Engineering Services for Traffic EngineeringIPlanning Services was
entered into between the City and Conklin, Porter & Holmes Engineers, Inc. on December
13, 1995. This was executed after the use ofCPH as the City's Traffic Engineer was
agreed upon at the November 27, 1995 City Commission meeting.
The scope of services in Amendment 45 called for the City to provided updated
traffic zone data to the consultant. Tom Grimms has indicated that this information is not
readily available and that he would not be able to provide this data in the time frame
allocated for this task. Supplement # 1 provides for CPH to assist in compiling this data
utilizing census data, land use maps, approved development plans, tax rolls, building
permits and various other sources as described in Exhibit I of Supplement 1. Considering
Mr. Grimm's time commitments to the ongoing Comp Plan Amendments, we need CPH
assistance to keep this project on track.
.
FUNDING:
The cost for Supplement #1 is $3,450. This is in addition to the $36,759 original cost of
Amendment 45. Funds are available from the Transportation Impact Fee Consulting
Services line code (#53180). Funds for this project will be expended by June 1, 1996.
RECOMMENDATION:
I recommend that authorization be given to execute Supplement #1 to Amendment 45 for
additional Traffic Engineering Services to be paid from the Consulting Services line code
of the Transportation Impact Fee Fund.
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
The scope of services will be incorporated into the original time line of Amendment 45.
The anticipated completion date is July 1, 1996. A workshop to review the preliminary
findings should be scheduled by April 15, 1996.
ATfACHMENTS:
1. Supplement #1 to Amendment 45
2. Amendment 45
3. Original Schedule of Events
4. November 27, 1995 minutes (page 5)
COMMISSION ACTION:
...---
t '-
'- ~ .'!' ~ .~.
t.,;,
.,.
Attachment No ~ 1
AMENDMENT NO. 45
Supplement No. 1
Consulting Engineering Services
This Supplement is made and entered into this _ day of ,
1996 by and between the City of Winter Springs and Conklin, Porter and Holmes-Engineers,
Inc.
WHEREAS, the CITY and ENGINEER have previously entered into an Agreement
for the ENGINEER's professional services (Amendment No. 45); and
WHEREAS, the CITY and the ENGINEER shall refer to Amendment 45 herein, and
desire to have it incorporated by reference; and
WHEREAS, the CITY and the ENGINEER now wish to modify and add specific
items to' Amendment 45;
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants
contained herein and given one to the other, the sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
I. SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of work has been agreed to by the parties, and is attached hereto
and incorporated herein, by reference, as Exhibit 1.
II. FEE
The fee has been agreed to by the parties, and is attached hereto and
incorporated herein, by reference, as EXHIBIT II.
ID. TERM
The term of this Supplement shall coincide with the completion of the Scope of
Services under Amendment No. 45.
.~.:_;
~ ;,;. .. '" ~
,
IV. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This Supplement supersedes all previous authorizations, agreement, or
representations, either verbal or written, heretofore in effect between the CITY
and the ENGINEER that may have concerned the matters covered herein,
except that this Supplement shall in no way supersede or amend Amendment
45 or other authorizations except as specifically provided herein. No
additions, alterations, or variations to the terms of this Supplement shall be
valid, nor can the provisions of this Supplement by waived by either party,
unless such additions, alterations, or waivers are expressly set forth in writing
in a document of import equal to Amendment 45 or the Supplement, and duly
executed.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Supplement No. I on
the day and year first written above.
CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
By:
Date:
ATTEST & SEAL:
City Clerk
CONKLIN, PORTER AND HOLMES-
ENGINEERS, INC.:
\ '
By:J7(,1h1u~
DeVere M. Fo.tworth
Vice President
Date: / Jd.J./ / '1 ~
cJ!: & SEAL:
'1JW}111k.J
Linda M. Gardner, Secretary-Treasurer
----<
,~..;: .~
EXHIBIT I
Supplement No.1
Engineering Scope of Services
Update of Winter Springs Comprehensive Development Plan,
Transportation Element
1. Assist the City in updating data and projecting specific development (socio-economic
data by traffic zone) that may occur between the base year of 1990 or 1992 and the
year 2010.
2. The zonal socio-economic data update will be accomplished by examining what vacant
land (or land that might be redeveloped) exists in each of the traffic zones since the
base year. It will then be determined for each vacant parcel within the traffic zone
what can be developed (single family, multiple family, office, retail, institutional,
etc.) and when. The following will be used to make this determination:
a. Tax rolls of Seminole County to determine the parcel size, nature of
ownership, improvements, etc.
b. Most current aerial of Winter Springs
c. Existing Land Use Map - 1990 as prepared by Engineering and Land Systems,
Inc.
d. Master Planning Map - August, 1995
e. Zoning Map - Update December 20, 1995
f. Future Land Use Map - 2010
g. Parcel Boundary Maps - August, 1994
h. Zoning and Land Development Codes of the City of Winter Springs
1. Comprehensive Plan - 1990 - 2010, Adopted April 27, 1992
J. Oviedo Crossing - Comprehensive Plan Amendment, April, 1995
k. Traffic Zone Map - data as provided by winter Springs
t"-';
.
'. ,
~_...-...~
1. 2010 - OUATS zone data (also 2020 if available)
m. 2010 - Winter Springs zone data from latest update
n. Latest zone data for base condition
o. 1990 census
p. Developments with approval
q. Proposed developments not yet approved
r. Building permits to update base condition
3. Projected development from 1990 or 1992 to the year 2010 will be expressed in terms
of number of dwelling units for each residential type and square footage for each non-
residential type. In turn, these will be converted into population, employment, or
other counts as needed using common multipliers (acceptable to the City). The final
format would be the "Year 2010 Winter Springs Socio-Economic Data" prepared by
Tipton and Associates unless otherwise agreed by the City and consultant. It is
understood that zonal socio-economic data for base year and 2010 must be approved
by the City of Winter Springs for use in the traffic projection.
.:.: -'
., ,
...'
. ......
.' .
EXHIBIT IT
Supplement No. 1
Additonal Not To Exceed Fee for Scope of Services
outlined in Supplement I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3,450.00
Original Authorization
Amendment 45 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $36,759.00
TOTAL AUTHORIZATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. $40,209.00
Attachment No.2
.. ,. ..... .-
T'
~ .~
AMENDMENT 45 TO AGREEMENT
DATED
NOVEMBER 27, 1984
CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES
FOR
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING / PLANNING SERVICES
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS
AND
CONKLIN, PORTER & HOLMES - ENGINEERS, INC.
This Amendment dated November 30. 1995, by and between the City of Winter Springs
(hereinafter called the OWNER) and Conklin, Porter & Holmes - Engineers, Inc. (hereinafter
called the Engineer), is mutually agreed upon and declared an authorized Amendment to an
Agreement dated November 27, 1984, between the parties, herein setting forth the scope,
terms and conditions of the services herein authorized. The appropriate provisions of the
November 27, 1984, Agreement apply as fully as if repeated herein.
SECTION 1
GENERAL
1.1
The purpose of this Amendment is to provide for Traffic Engineering/Planning
Services, more specifically itemized herein, for the updating of the traffic
circulation element of the Comprehensive Plan, appropriate updating of the
transportation impact fee schedule, and certain additional data / analysis needed
for concurrency and assistance with public involvement.
SECTION 2
BASIC SERVICES OF THE ENGINEER
2.1 GENERAL
2.1.1 The ENGINEER agrees to perform professional services in connection with the
project as hereinafter stated.
2.1.2 The ENGINEER will serve as the OWNER's professional engineering
representative in those phases of the project to which this Amendment applies,
and will give consultation and advice to the OWNER during the performance of
his services. The ENGINEER will perform the services for the City Commission
under the general supervision of the City Manager, Community Development
Coordinator, and Utilities Director and will submit interim information to them
for their review, input, decision, etc. as appropriate.
SECTION 3
SCOPE OF SERVICES
3.1
GENERAL
The OWNER hereby authorizes the ENGINEER to proceed with the study.
3.2
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING / PLANNING SERVICES DATA COLLECTION
AND ANALYSIS
3.2.1.
Review latest update of Traffic Circulation element and suggest modification, if
appropriate, in the following sections:
o Goals, Objectives and Policies
CI Capital Improvement (Transportation) Funding
" .
o Concurrency Management Testing
· Transportation Impact Fee Calculations
o Land Use Element
Q Level of Service (Transportation)
· Roadway Classifications/Systems Selection
3.2.2 Obtain FSUTMS (Florida Standard Urban Transportation Model Structure)
Networks and TZ Data (existing / 2010) from Tipton Associates, Inc. and verify
accuracy.
3.2.3 Obtain Traffic Studies for developments approved since adoption of the
Comprehensive Plan or alternatively available capacity by link on the circulation
map and determined to be vested traffic.
3.2.4 Make Baseline (1996) Traffic Counts to track concurrency.
3.2.5 Coordinate with the City on update of the TZ data for model input. This would
be accomplished by the City or could be by CPH as a supplemental service. If
CPH develops this data, City approval will be required before input to FSUTMS.
3.2.6 Prepare interim technical report (memo) containing results of data collection and
analysis.
3.3 RE-EVALUATE THE COLLECTOR ROAD SYSTEM
3.3.1 Review the need for specific roads and develop typical cross sections for those
proposed in the current fiscal year. Those collector rods requiring review are:
· Hayes Road north of Bahama Road
· West Panama Road
· Moss Road north of Panama Road
It is understood that Task 3.3.1 will be conducted concurrently with Tasks in 3.2.
3.3.2 Attend City Commission work session to present alternatives. Prepare and make
presentation at one public hearing on current fiscal year projects.
3.3.3 Prepare location and corridor studies for the following road extensions:
· Shore Road / Fisher
· Panama Road from Shore Road to Tuskawilla Road
Functional plans will be prepared without surveyor new aerial photography.
Drainage design and cross-sections are not anticipated.
It is understood that Task 3.3.3 will be conducted following Tasks 3.3.1 and 3.2.
It will be done concurrently with 3.3.4.
"I
3.3.4 Update Traffic Circulation Plan including the following work items:
. Test alternative systems with 2010 traffic projections. Four alternative
tests are anticipated.
· Meet with City Commission to discuss alternative tests.
o Prepare for and attend one public hearing.
Cl Staff assistance in preparing Comprehensive Plan Amendment.
3.4 ' UPDATE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES
3.4.1 Estimate Capital Improvement Costs including bridge/drainage improvements.
3.4.2 Review/modify ability to finance capital improvements, i.e. transportation.
· Make five year revenue projection.
3.4.3 Modify section 9-386 of the Code of Ordinances - Transportation Impact Fees and
develop new impact fee schedule and formula, if appropriate.
SECTION 4
SUPPLEMENTARY SERVICES OF THE ENGINEER
4.1 If authorized in writing by the OWNER prior to the rendering of such services,
the ENGINEER will furnish or obtain under subcontracts, supplementary services
of the following types which will be paid for by the OWNER as described in
SECTION 6, Paragraph 6.1.2.
4.2.1 Additional services due to significant changes in the scope of the project or its
design including, but not limited to, changes in size, complexity, character or due
to time delays in initiating or completion of the work as described herein.
4.2.2 Additional services in connection with the project including services normally
furnished by the OWNER as described in Section 5 herein and services not
otherwise provided for in this Amendment.
4.2.3 Preparing to serve and serving as an expert witness for the OWNER in any
protest, litigation, or other proceeding involving the project.
" J
4.2.4 Additional engineering services required by revisions to the Comprehensive Plan
as applicable to the Florida Department of Community Affairs, or other
regulatory agency requirements.
4.2.5 Provide, through a subconsultant, services if required or' requested by the
OWNER.
SECTION 5
THE OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES
5.1 THE OWNER WILL:
5.1.1 Advise the ENGINEER of his requirements for the project and designate a person
to act as the OWNER's representative with respect to the work to be performed
under this Amendment, and such person shall have complete authority to transmit
instructions, receive information, interpret and define the OWNER's policies and
decisions pertinent to the work covered by this Amendment.
5.1.2 Guarantee access to and make all provision for the ENGINEER to enter upon
public and private lands as required for the ENGINEER to perform his work
under this Amendment.
5.1.3 Provide requested data by traffic zone necessary for modeling of traffic
projections.
5.1.4 Examine all studies, reports, sketches, and other documents presented by the
ENGINEER and render decisions pertaining thereto within a reasonable time so
as not to delay the work of the ENGINEER.
5.1.5 Obtain approval of all governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the
project, and such approvals and consents from such other individuals or bodies
as may be necessary for completion of the Project.
5.1.6 Furnish, or direct the ENGINEER in writing to provide at the OWNER's
expense, land use projections and traffic zone data to update the 2010 projections
if not provided by the Owner.
5.1. 7 Furnish, or direct the ENGINEER in writing to provide at the OWNER's
expense, necessary additional services as stipulated in Section 4 of this
Amendment, or other services as required.
5.1.8 Provide such legal, accounting, and insurance counseling services as may be
required for the project, and such auditing services as the OWNER may require.
5.1.9 Give prompt written notice to the ENGINEER whenever the OWNER observes
or otherwise becomes aware of any defect in the Project.
SECTION 6
PAYMENT
6.1 PA YMENT
Payments for services of the ENGINEER to be as set forth below:
6.1.1 Principals and Employees of the Engineer.
6.1.2 Compensation paid ENGINEER for services described herein and rendered by
principals and employees assigned to the Project will be computed by multiplying
Direct Personnel Expense (defmed in Paragraph 6.2.4 herein) times a factor of
2.0 plus all reimbursable expenses. The fee for the services described herein is
itemized below. It is understood that the Owner may authorize each task
separately or by phase:
Data Collection and Review/modify circulation 3.2.1 $1,381.00
Analysis elements
Obtain and verify FSUTMS 3.2.2 $938.00
Accuracy
Review Traffic Studies for vested 3.2.3 $1,807.00
traffic
1996 Traffic Counts 3.2.4
Summary Report 3.2.5
Re-evaluate the collector Current FY Review 3.3.1
system Hearings, meetings 3.3.2
Corridor studies 3.3.3
Update Circulation Plan 3:3.4
Phase Total
Update Transportation Estimate Capital Improvements 3.4.1
Impact Fees costs
Financial Study 3.4.2
New impact fees, Section 9-386 3.4.3
. .. ~ -
6.2
6.2.1
6.2.2
6.2.3
6.2.4
6.2.5
6.2.6
7.1
REIMBURSED EXPENSES
Expenses for items not specifically valued herein are to be reimbursed to the
ENGINEER at the actual cost thereof. Said expenses shall include transportation
and subsistence of principals and employees, when traveling in connection with
the Project, toll telephone calls, telegrams and similar project-related items. .
The OWNER will make prompt monthly payments in response to ENGINEER's
monthly statements without retention for all categories of services rendered under
this Amendment and for reimbursable expenses incurred.
Direct Personnel Expense used as a basis for payment shall mean the salaries and
wages paid to principals and employees of all classifications engaged directly on
the Project, plus the cost of fringe benefits including but not limited to, social
security contributions, worker's compensation, health and retirement benefits,
bonuses, sick leave, vacation and holiday pay applicable thereto. For purposes
of this Amendment, Direct Personnel Expense shall be considered an amount
equal to 1.48 times applicable salaries and wages.
Charges for the services rendered by principals and employees as witnesses in any
litigation, hearing or proceeding in accordance with Paragraph 4.1.4 will be
computed at a rate of $400.00 per day or any portion thereof (but compensation
for time spent in preparing to appear in any such litigation, hearing or proceeding
will be computed in accordance with the funding levels as set forth in Paragraph
6.1.1 and 6.2.1 herein).
If this Amendment is terminated during prosecution of the services prior to
completion of the services of Section 3, payments to be made in accordance with
Paragraph 6.1.1 and 6.2.1 on account of that and all prior work under this
Amendment shall be due and payable, and shall constitute total payment for
services rendered. In addition, upon termination, the ENGINEER shall be paid
for any Additional Services authorized and rendered under Section 4.
The ENGINEER shall promptly begin work on the services authorized by this
Amendment upon receipt of notice to proceed from the OWNER, including the
specific work tasks authorized.
SECTION 7
GENERAL CONDITIONS
Since the ENGINEER has no control over the cost of labor, materials, or
equipment, or over any construction contractor's method of determining prices,
any opinions of probable construction cost which may be provided in the services
of this Amendment are made on the basis of his experience and qualifications and
represent his best judgement as a design professional familiar with the
construction industry, but the ENGINEER cannot and does not guarantee that bids
or the construction cost will not vary from opinions of probable cost prepared by
him.
7.2
The OWNER and the ENGINEER each binds himself and his partners,
successors, executors, administrators and assigns to the other party of this
Amendment and to partners, successors, executors, administrators, and assigns
of such other party in respect to all covenants of this Amendment. Nothing
herein shall be construed as creating any personal liability on the part of any
officer or agency of any public body which may be a party hereto, nor shall it be
construed as giving any rights or benefits hereunder to anyone other than the
OWNER and the ENGINEER.
SECTION 8
8.1
The ENGINEER agrees to prosecute the work in a timely manner until the
Project is completed.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have made and executed this
Amendment the day and year first above written.
OWNER:
City of Winter Springs, Florida
ATTEST & SEAL
~~.~
Ii1/'
ENGINEER:
Conklin, Porter & Holmes - Engineers, Inc.
By:
eVe . F, xworth, P.E.
Vice PrFsi~nt - Transportation
Date: 1;!3tJ!1')
amend45 . l mg
ATTACHMENT A
DETAILED PLAN OF STUDY
(Man Hours)
.... .
""I~i~R SPRINGS IRAfFIC/PlAHNIIt6
3.2-0ATA COlLfCTIGM A~ ANALYSIS
.
LOCAL HA~:UPDATE Of TRAFFIC CIRCUlAIIO
DAIA COlLECIIOfI AI<<) AfIfllY51S
DATE: 12-1-9~
OKKlIH, PORIER AftO HOlliES
Proj. llaDager Ir anspfll9r 1 civil fngr Traffic lach fOUler ator 1 Toul l\a nhou rs AVerage
ACllVl1Y Planner Secretary_ AClivity By Hou rl y
llaRHrs Rate MallHrs Rate "anHr Rate "alliin Rale lie nHr s Rale fee Activity Rate
( I ASK)
tfVIEll/lIOOlfY (3.2.1) 3 la.85 1~ 21.50 0 19.~5 0 Ii .53 4 9.00 466.55 23 20.28
'ERin fSUl1lS (3.2.2) 2 28.85 8 21 .50 0 19.~5 6 14 .53 0 9.00 316.88 1& 19.81
IESTED TRAffIC (3.2.3) 3 28.85 15 21. ~O 0 19.65 12 14 .53 3 9.00 610.41 33 18.50
!RAfflC CI5/1996(3.2.4) 2 28.85 8 21.50 0 19.65 40 14 .53 120 9.00 1890.90 170 11.12
tEPORT-DATA COl..l(3.2.~r' 2 28.85 10 21.50 0 19.65 12 14 .53 4 9.00 483.06 28 17.2~
0 28:85 0 21.50 0 19.65 0 14.53 0 9.00 0.00 0
0 28.85 0 21.50 0 19.65 0 14 .53 0 9.00 0,00 0
0 28.85 0 21.50 0 19.65 0 14 .53 0 9.00 o .GO 0
0 28.85 0 21.50 0 19.65 0 14 .53 0 9.00 0.00 0
0 28.85 0 21.50 0 19.65 0 14 .53 0 9.00 0.00 0
0 28.85 0 21.50 0 19.65 0 14 .53 0 9.00 0.00 0
lotds 12 57 0 70 131 3767.8 2/0
fIncludes aeetings
IOTAl l~P SUIl FEE C~UIAIIOHS
lotal activities fee '3,767.80
Cost [ie.ents & Additives
(a )Luap Sill or 121.0909l for overhead $4,562.46
(b)tulP SUI of 48.000~ for friDge $1,808.54
Subtotal SlO ,138.80
(c)lu~ SUI for operating .argin 10' tl,OI3.88
Total personnne! Cotpensetion (NOT TO EXCEfO) U I, 152 . 68
IfUHr.R'SPRlfiI6S TRAfflClPlIWIIHG ,
. 3.3 REEVALUAlE tHE COlLECtOR ROAD SYSlEft
LOCAl NAftEVPOArE rRAffIC CIRCULATION
VPDATE COllECJORS
DAlE: 12-1-95
COMlllt, POR IER AltO KOlAES
Proj. "ana~er Ir all!pE~T I Civil En9T Traffic Tech EllUteratoT I Iota! "anllours AVerage
Acmi IT Planner Secretary _ ftttivity By Hour! y
/laMlrs Rate "anHrs Rate /lanHr Rate "UHr! Rate "anHrs Rate Fee Activity Rate
(IASk)
CURRENT FY REVIEW(3.3.1 4 28.85 8 21.50 20 19.65 16 14 .53 2 9.00 930.88 50 18.62
KEARIH6S/M.E 1 IPl6S( 3.3.2 6 28.85 8 21.50 0 19.65 10 14.53 3 9.00 517.40 27 19.16
CORRIDOR SIUDIES(3.J.3) 5 28.85 12 21. 50 35 19.65 J() 14.53 6 9.00 1579.90 88 17.95
UPDATE elR PlAH{3.3.41. 12 28.85 72 21.50 0 19.65 59 14.53 8 9.00 2823.47 151 18.70
" O' 28.85 0 21.50 0 19.65 0 14 .53 0 9.00 0.00 0
0 28.85 0 21.50 0 19.65 0 14 .53 0 9.00 0.00 0
0 28.85 0 21.50 0 19.65 0 14.53 0 9.00 0.00 0
0 28.85 0 21. 50 0 19.65 0 14 .53 0 9.00 0.00 0
0 28.85 0 21.50 0 19.65 0 14.53 0 9.00 0.00 0
0 28.85 0 21.50 0 19.65 0 14.53 0 9.00 0.00 0
0 2S.S5 0 21.50 0 19.65 0 14 .53 0 9.00 0.00 0
lotals 27 100 55 115 19 5851.65 316
'Includes Deelings
TorAl lUftP SUIl fEE CO"PUTATIOHS
rotal activiti~ Fee '5,851.65
Cost Eletents & Additives
(a)luap SUI or 121.09091 for Overhfad H,OS5.S2
(b}Lulp Sill of 48.0001 for fringe '2,S08.79
Subtotal us ,746 .26
(c }t.lltp SUI for operating targin 10\ n ,5H .63
lotal Personnnel COlpeDsation (HOllO EXCEED) $17 ,320 .89
WINfER SPRINGS IRAFfIC/PlAHftl~
" < ~ '3.4'UPDATE IRANSPURIAflOH IftPACl FEES
· ConKLIN, PORrER ANO HOtnfS
DAfE: 12-1-95
LOCAL NAnE:VPOAfE Of fRAfFIC CIRCUlAII0
HEll H'PACI fEES
proj. "allager J r anspE ngr I civil Engr fraffic Tech ffluler atOrl rotal lIaahours Aver age
ACI JYIIY Planner Secretary_ Activity By Hourly
"a nH rs Rate /la nHrs Rate !IanHr Rate lIanHrs Rate "a IlHr! Rate fee Activity Rate
( r ASK)
CAPITAL lKP(3.4.1) 6 28.85 0 21.50 36 19.65 4 14.53 2 9.00 956.62 48 19.93
FiNANC!AL SrVOY(3.4.2) 4 28.85 30 Z 1. 50 0 'l'U5 0 14.53 3 9.00 7B7.40 37 21.28
CHAHGE SEe ~-38b(3.4.3) 5 28.85 29 21.50 0 19.65 16 14.53 6 9.00 1054.23 '56 18.83
0 28 .85 0 21.50 0 19.65 0 14 .53 0 9,00 0.00 0
0 28.85 0 21. 50 0 19.65 0 14.53 0 9.00 0.00 0
0 28 .85 0 21.50 0 19.65 0 14.53 0 9.00 0.00 0
0 28.85 0 21.50 0 19.65 0 14.53 0 9.00 0.00 0
0 28.85 0 21.50 0 19.65 0 14.53 0 9.00 0.00 0
0 28.85 0 21.50 0 19.65 0 14.53 0 9.00 0.00 0
0 28 .85 0 21.50 0 19.65 0 14.53 0 9.00 0.00 0
0 28.85 0 21.50 0 19.65 0 14 .53 0 9.00 0.00 0
Iotais 15 S9 36 20 11 2798.ZS 141
tincludes .eeting!
IOTAL LUftP SUII FEE CO~UIATIO~
rotal activities fee '2,798.25
Cost EJeaeflts & Additives
(a)lulP SUI or 121.0909\ for OVerhead $3,388.43
(b}Lulp Sill of ~B.OOOt for Fringe $I ,343.11>
Subtotal 17,529.84
(c )Luep SUI for opfTllti It9 largi n lOt '752 .'~B
lolal Personnnel Cotpen!lItioe (HOT TO EXCEEO) '8,282.82
'!>
,
W'NTER SPRINGS TRAFF1C CIRCULATION PLAN
1996 UPDATE
TASK/MONTH TOTAL COM- START MONTH
FINAL DESIGN % PillE DATE
rro DATE 1 2 3 4 5 6
RrnEW / MODIFY '/2/96
VERIFY F.S.UIM.S. 1/15/96
Vi:STEO TRAme 1/5/96
'96 TRAFfC COUNTS 1/15/96
DATA REPORT 3/1/96
CURREKT LY. i~\s:u 1/10/96
/.0\.1a,......
HEARING CURRENT 2/15/9E
CORRIDOR STUDIES 2/1/96
UPDATE p~ 3/1/96
CAPlT N. COST 4/1/96
FlNANCW. STUDY 5/1/96
IMPACT FEES 5/1/96
T.Z. DATA (CflY) 1/2/96
SCHEDULE OF EVENTS
Conklin Korter and Holmes
~ r(] ENGINnRS. INC.
~ IF DATE: JANUARY 1. 1 996
o
....
b
())
I
....
~
....
Ul
el
l>
o
~
J ~
~ lH
lD
r:
j
~
~
2
u
~
:.) ~
)::>'
c-r
M-
Ol
(')
~
3
(0
::l
M-
,2
o
.
w
"
(-'
Attachment No. ~
(-\
Regular Meeting City Commission
November 27, 1995
95-96-04
Page 5
comfortable and feel that we have a handle on the situation and don't need to continue in litigation,
if we get the assurances we want. The assurances are as follows: there will be no commercial or any
other activity in violation of the City Codes and there will be no violation of any State Laws,
Discussion. '
Attorney Kruppenbacher mentioned that on the City Manager background checks, we are down to
three, we now have signed authorizations from the three applicants. From the two that I have read,
there are no criminal background negative reports that have come up. In the process of doing the
credit check, which we should have at the end of the week or beginning of next week. The
preliminary inquiries in the three areas that they come from are coming back without negatives; my
recommendation to you is once you' have interviewed them, I would like you to ask them during their
interviews what negatives should we expect when we go and do an on site inspection, Discussion.
<
Attorney Kruppenbacher stated that he has review the material regarding Conklin Porter & Holmes >
and we are going to move forward and use them as the traffic engineer for the project we have been
looking at.
Attorney Kruppenbacher also mentioned that he will set up a closed meeting for the Mayor and
Commission in the weeks to come for you to review and discuss with our outside lawyers on the
Sullivan vs. the City of Winter Springs lawsuit.
City Manager - John Govoruhk (1) Reports (2) Proposed HealthlLife Ins, Committee Selection of
Final Three (3) East Central Florida Regional Planning Council FY 96 Assessment (4) Discussion on
Code of Ordinances on the Internet:
Manager Govoruhk stated that the Commission has a package on the proposed Health/Life Insurance
and asked the Commission if they would like to have the three companies to give a presentation at
the next meeting or set up a special meeting, Discussion. It was determined that there will be a
special meeting on December 4, 1995 at 7:00 p,m. to hear the presentations of the three final
compames.
Manager Govoruhk said that the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council's sent us a bill and
does the Commission want to pay it or not. Discussion.
Motion was made by Commissioner Langellotti to pay the fee of $6,193.00 to the E.C.F.R.P.C.
yearly fees to stay in the council. Seconded by Commissioner Ferring. Discussion, Vote:
Commissioner McLeod: aye; Commissioner Gennell:' aye; Commissioner Langellotti: aye;
Commissioner Ferring: aye; Commissioner Conniff: aye. Motion passes.
Manager Govoruhk said the City has received a letter from the Florida League of Cities requesting
to put our ordinances on the internet at no cost to the City, It was unanimous consensus of the
Commission to go ahead with that.
Manager Govoruhk mentioned that the City finally has the inter-agency agreement with the court